• No results found

HANDOUTS FOR LESSON 1: T222 VERSION 1. This appendix contains the items listed in this table-- Title/Synopsis

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "HANDOUTS FOR LESSON 1: T222 VERSION 1. This appendix contains the items listed in this table-- Title/Synopsis"

Copied!
24
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

D-1

HANDOUTS FOR LESSON 1: T222 VERSION 1

This appendix contains the items listed in this table--

Title/Synopsis Pages

SH-1, Advance Sheet SH-1-1 and SH-1-2

SH-2, Extracted Material from A Leader’s Guide to After Action Reviews (AAR)

SH-2-1 thru SH-2-16

SH-3, Extracted Material from ADP 3-0, Unified Land Operations

SH-3-1 thru SH-3-3

(2)

SH-1-1

Student Handout 1

Advance Sheet

Lesson Hours This lesson consists of 30 minutes of small group instruction and 20 minutes of practical exercise.

Overview During this lesson you will learn how to use the after action review process as a way to make sure your Soldiers actually learn during their training activities. As an NCO and a leader, you are responsible for training your subordinates. To do this effectively, you must make sure your Soldiers discover for themselves what happened in the training and why. You must also evaluate the training to be sure it meets the established standards. The after action review will help you do this.

Terminal Learning Objective

NOTE: The instructor should inform the students of the following Terminal Learning Objective requirements.

At the completion of this lesson, you [the student] will: Action: Conduct an after action review.

Conditions: As a leader of a squad/team, in the classroom and during a situational training exercise, given the instruction in this lesson.

Standards: Conduct an after action review by--

 Analyzing the after action review process,  Conducting an after action review of a recent

event, and

 Conducting an after action review after each evaluation or training event.

ELO A Analyze the after action review process.

ELO B Conduct an after action review of a recent event.

ELO C Conduct an informal after action review after each evaluation or training event.

(3)

SH-1-2

Assignments The student assignments for this lesson are the following:  Read Student Handout-1, Advance Sheet;

 Read Student Handout-2, Extracts from A Leader’s Guide to After Action Reviews (AAR);

 Read Student Handout-3, Extracts from ADP 3-0;

 Read Student Handout-4, Comparison of a Critique with an AAR;  Participate in classroom discussions;

 Complete the practical exercise; and  Turn in recoverable reference materials. Additional Subject

Area Resources None

Bring to Class You must bring the following materials to class:  Student Handout-1, Advance Sheet;

 Student Handout-2, Extracts from A Leader’s Guide to After Action Reviews (AAR);

 Student Handout-3, Extract from ADP 3-0;

 Student Handout-4, Comparison of a Critique with an AAR; and  Pen or pencil and writing paper.

(4)

SH-2-1

Student Handout 2

Extracted Material from A Leader’s Guide to After Action Reviews (AAR)

This student handout contains 15 pages of extracted materials from the following publication:

A Leader’s Guide to After Action Reviews (AAR), Sep 2011 pages SH-2-2 thru SH-2-16

NOTE: The training developer downloaded the extracted materials from the US Army Combined Arms Center-Training. The text may contain passive voice, misspellings, grammatical errors, etc., and may not be in compliance with the Army Writing Style Program.

(5)
(6)
(7)
(8)
(9)
(10)
(11)
(12)
(13)
(14)
(15)
(16)
(17)
(18)
(19)
(20)

SH-3-1

Student Handout 3

Extracted Material from ADP 3-0, Unified Land Operations

This student handout contains two pages of extracted materials from the following publication:

ADP 3-0, Unified Land Operations, 10 Oct 2011

pages SH-3-2 and SH-3-3

NOTE: The training developer downloaded the extracted materials from the Army Publishing Directorate. The text may contain passive voice,

misspellings, grammatical errors, etc., and may not be in compliance with the Army Writing Style Program.

(21)
(22)
(23)

SH-4-1

Student Handout 4

Comparison of a Critique with an AAR

(24)

SH-4-2

Comparison of a Critique with an AAR

This student handout consists of information on the comparison of a critique with an AAR. It does not contain any doctrine or regulatory guidance. This is a take home handout. Use this information to take care of your Soldiers.

Critique After Action Review

“Can’t you people move any faster than that? You’ll never be the best section if you can’t get a round ready faster than third section. Jones, you’ve got to get the fuze cut quicker…” “But SGT…”

“I don’t want to hear it. You were too slow. Smith, when you hear the deflection, I want you traversing immediately and not swinging back and forth.”

“Chief, the net was in the way.”

“Then get someone to hold the net. Jones, when you hear the mission, get the net and hold it out of the way. Now let’s get it right this time.”

“Okay we were awfully slow that time. What happened?”

“Well SGT, Jones didn’t get the fuze set fast enough.” “What happened Jones?”

“I couldn’t find the M36 fuze setter, Chief.” “Where was it supposed to be?”

“I don’t know.”

“What tells you where to put the section equipment?” “Uh—the load plan?”

“Right. That’s why we have one now. Smith, what was the problem in getting on the deflection?” “I wasn’t sure which way to go and the net was in the way, Chief.”

“Well, the net we can fix by moving one support. Anybody knows how to help the gunner?” “Hey SGT, doesn’t it go left add, right subtract?’ “Yeah so….” “Well, if the deflection goes up then Smith would have to traverse left wouldn’t he?” “That’s right, so let’s see what we’ve learned and try it again.

References

Related documents

While not seeking to ignore the scale of the problems in Gaza, we were concerned that immediate exposure to the full scale of the challenges facing the country would prove

The Nokia Siemens Networks Monitoring Center can be used for intercepting communications in public fixed and mobile circuit-switched networks, Next Generation Networks (NGN) and the

La resistencia mecĂĄnica a la penetraciĂłn (RP) es un indicador del proceso de compactaciĂłn de un suelo, que representa limitantes en la producciĂłn agrĂ­cola, el estudio

I focus my analysis from the NHIS on six health outcomes likely to display evidence of heuristic decision making at the obesity threshold: diabetes, hypertension, angina,

conveyed or reserved or if you are the owner of a Mineral Servitude (someone other than the owner of the land owns the minerals), and you grant an Oil, Gas and Mineral Lease,

• Mathematical Practices—Practice 3B: Identify an appropriate mathematical definition, theorem, or test to apply.. • Mathematical Practices—Practice 3C: onfirm whether

If you receive this error, please check that the start date entered is within the period of at least one of your professional jobs. If it does, your details may not have been

18 Its mission was to “organize and train Air Transport units for all forms of Air Transport with special emphasis on the conduct of operations involving the air movement