• No results found

In the end you should always do the right thing even if it's hard.

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "In the end you should always do the right thing even if it's hard."

Copied!
17
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

“In the end you should always do the right

thing even if it's hard.”

(2)

Overview

Problems Solved;

Stay in compliance with the World Handicap System guidelines (7.1) to monitor and have

available for peer review fellow members handicap index, scores and tournament

performance

Minimize confrontations and bad feelings with members by using data to back up

adjustments to members handicaps

Treats all players the same by electronically monitoring every handicap index per World

Handicap System recommendation

Creates level playing field for all members in tournaments

By harnessing the data, we provide the golf staff and committee members objective

information to more effectively fulfill their roles and remove many delicate issues that can

lead to member and golfer disenfranchisement.

Some of the Benefits;

Additional revenue (3x ROI - 6% increase in tournament revenue)

Ensures more diverse group of high finishers in all your tournaments

Shows all other clubs that you are monitoring all your handicap indexes to ensure fair play

(3)
(4)

Cap Patrol - Handicap Monitering & Adjustment System

Big Burch Country Club

Player

Turned In

Index

Cap

New

Member

Current

Score

Index

+ / -

High

Low

vs Now

Home Away

Diff

Rounds

Index

Ability

%

Events

Points

Adjust

1

Golfer, Joe

2.8

16

1.0

(1.8)

4.1

1.0

12%

1.2

3.4

17%

22

1.1

13%

62%

11

14.0

4

2

Golfer, Joe

17.8

36

13.7

(4.1)

19.1

13.7

14%

19.1

20.4

4%

27

14.3

13%

96%

14

10.0

2

3

Golfer, Joe

17.2

43

14.7

(2.5)

17.2

14.7

9%

15.5

20.6

19%

7

15.4

7%

93%

4

10.0

2

4

Golfer, Joe

8.4

49

7.6

(0.7)

9.3

7.6

4%

8.4

9.2

4%

14

7.7

4%

85%

7

11.0

2

5

Golfer, Joe

13.2

49

10.6

(2.6)

13.2

9.1

16%

14.2

9.4

-18%

3

8.0

26%

92%

2

0.0

0

6

Golfer, Joe

5.1

50

3.4

(0.9)

5.1

1.6

20%

2.1

5.5

24%

13

3.4

11%

94%

7

0.0

0

7

Golfer, Joe

1.5

52

0.4

(1.1)

1.5

(0.2)

13%

0.6

1.8

10%

14

(0.8)

20%

65%

7

0.0

0

8

Golfer, Joe

10.8

52

9.0

(1.8)

10.8

7.7

14%

9.1

10.5

7%

6

7.2

19%

27%

3

0.0

0

9

Golfer, Joe

8.9

53

6.9

(2.0)

9.2

6.8

10%

8.6

7.2

-7%

24

5.0

23%

14%

12

8.0

0

10

Golfer, Joe

20.6

56

18.1

(1.6)

25.0

15.5

16%

21.5

23.0

4%

6

17.5

11%

85%

3

0.0

0

11

Golfer, Joe

12.4

57

12.4

0.0

15.3

12.4

0%

13.8

13.5

-1%

12

13.5

-4%

96%

6

11.0

2

12

Golfer, Joe

5.1

58

5.1

0.0

5.1

2.3

16%

4.0

4.0

0%

37

3.9

8%

92%

19

3.0

0

13

Golfer, Joe

8.4

58

8.4

0.0

9.3

6.2

11%

7.8

7.7

-1%

22

5.9

14%

75%

11

0.0

0

14

Golfer, Joe

6.8

58

6.8

0.0

6.8

5.3

8%

6.6

7.7

6%

11

4.1

17%

86%

6

8.0

0

15

Golfer, Joe

20.3

59

20.3

0.0

20.3

16.0

13%

19.8

23.4

11%

8

18.1

7%

71%

4

3.0

0

16

Golfer, Joe

1.5

59

1.5

0.0

1.7

0.1

10%

(0.1)

2.6

23%

14

0.4

9%

78%

7

0.0

0

17

Golfer, Joe

10.7

60

10.7

0.0

10.7

7.2

15%

8.7

11.2

12%

12

10.1

3%

65%

6

0.0

0

18

Golfer, Joe

8.2

60

8.2

0.0

8.8

6.9

6%

7.8

8.5

4%

17

5.3

17%

82%

9

7.5

0

19

Golfer, Joe

2.3

60

2.3

0.0

3.3

2.3

0%

4.1

6.6

16%

11

(0.4)

23%

95%

6

0.0

0

20

Golfer, Joe

7.1

61

7.1

0.0

6.6

4.7

13%

5.8

7.0

7%

11

6.1

6%

97%

6

0.0

0

21

Golfer, Joe

14.5

61

14.5

0.0

14.7

10.6

15%

15.5

13.8

-6%

2

13.4

4%

84%

1

0.0

0

22

Golfer, Joe

12.5

61

12.5

0.0

12.8

9.3

13%

11.8

12.3

2%

11

11.3

5%

96%

6

0.0

0

23

Golfer, Joe

4.5

61

4.5

0.0

4.9

2.4

13%

2.6

4.6

14%

9

3.9

4%

81%

5

0.0

0

24

Golfer, Joe

12.9

61

12.9

0.0

13.1

11.8

4%

13.1

13.1

0%

1

9.4

16%

39%

1

0.0

0

25

Golfer, Joe

12.0

62

12.0

0.0

12.0

9.1

12%

11.7

11.2

-2%

6

10.8

5%

65%

3

0.0

0

26

Golfer, Joe

11.3

62

11.3

0.0

12.2

9.4

8%

11.8

11.7

0%

23

9.1

11%

71%

12

8.5

0

27

Golfer, Joe

6.3

63

6.3

0.0

6.6

4.6

9%

6.6

4.7

-10%

9

4.6

10%

96%

5

4.0

0

28

Golfer, Joe

6.3

64

6.3

0.0

9.2

4.7

9%

5.2

7.5

13%

18

5.4

5%

94%

9

3.0

0

29

Golfer, Joe

13.4

64

13.4

0.0

13.4

12.3

4%

14.0

10.9

-12%

7

10.1

15%

92%

4

3.5

0

30

Golfer, Joe

7.2

64

7.2

0.0

8.7

6.1

6%

8.6

7.7

-4%

7

5.2

12%

65%

4

0.0

0

Page 1

Last 12 Months

4/5/2019

Suggested

Data Points

(5)

Oak Tree Country Club

Sep 23 2019 CAP PATROL, LLC

Turned In

Current Cap New

No Member Member # Gender Index Score Index + / - High Low vs Now Home Away Diff Rounds Index Ability % Events Points Adj

1 JONES, ROBERT 5694856 MENS 10.7 34 5.9 (4.8) 11.7 5.9 21% 17.3 16.0 -5% 14 6.1 25% 100% 12 8.5 2

0.8 72 77 74 2018 Member-Member Runner-Up

0.8 76 84 71 2017 Wilson Trophy Winner

0.8 76 83 70 2017 Member-Guest Runner-Up

0.8 79 76 73 2017 Father Son Fifth

0.8 82 82 73 2017 Better Ball Fifth

0.8 75 0.8 75 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 1.1 1.1 1.4 1.6 1.6 1.9 1.9 2.6 2.6 3.1 1.8 1.8 1.2 1/15/2019 1/1/2019 12/15/2018 12/1/2018 11/15/2018 11/1/2018 10/15/2018 10/1/2018 9/15/2018 9/1/2018 4/1/2018 8/15/2018 8/1/2018 7/15/2018 7/1/2018 6/15/2018 6/1/2018 5/15/2018 5/1/2018 4/15/2018 3/15/2019 3/1/2019 2/15/2019 2/1/2019

Player

Suggested

Cap Patrol

Index

Data Points

TPS

Home vs Away

Potential

Last 12 Months

(6)

Cap Patrol, LLC

Score Posting Report

Oak Tree Country Club

10/2/2019

Member Search

GHIN Search

No

Member

#

Gender Cap Score

Played

Posted

Practice

Other

+/-

%

TPS

1

Smith, Greg

123456

M

17

39

36

3

2

(2)

106%

17.0

2

Jones, Wendy

358941

F

25

7

5

0

2

0

100%

0.0

3

Stone, George

234568

M

38

48

46

0

0

2

96%

12.0

4

Sweeney, Jimmy

145698

M

39

26

21

0

0

5

81%

7.5

5

Frey, Paige

198756

F

41

12

6

0

0

6

50%

8.5

6

Granger, Doug

425836

M

45

65

38

0

1

26

60%

0.0

7

Russ, Bob

24987

M

57

58

38

4

9

7

87%

2.5

8

Ripple, Al

268754

M

64

14

12

0

0

2

86%

0.0

9

Franklin, Ken

26579

M

69

125

119

6

0

0

100%

9.0

10

Dowd, Robbie

25879

M

78

35

19

0

0

16

54%

14.0

11

Klepper, Jim

1458745

M

85

51

25

0

0

26

49%

0.0

12

Friedly, John

154896

M

96

18

5

0

0

13

28%

0.0

Rounds

Export to Excel

(7)

Cap Patrol, LLC Score Posting Report Oak Tree Country Club 10/2/2019

Member Search GHIN Search

No Member # Gender Cap Score Played Posted Practice Other +/- % TPS

1 Smith, Greg 123456 M 17 39 36 3 2 (2) 106% 17.0

No Round Played Posted Practice Score Slope

1 Hyde Park Country Club 04/01/20 04/01/20 78 131

2 Hyde Park Country Club 04/07/20 04/07/20 74 129

3 Hyde Park Country Club 04/11/20 04/11/20 81 134

4 Hyde Park Country Club 04/19/20 04/19/20 84 128

5 Hyde Park Country Club 04/23/20 04/23/20 86 129

6 Hyde Park Country Club 05/06/20 05/06/20 79 131

7 Hyde Park Country Club 05/07/20 05/07/20 78 131

8 Hyde Park Country Club 05/09/20 74 129

9 Hyde Park Country Club 05/11/20 05/11/20 81 134

10 Hyde Park Country Club 05/19/20 05/19/20 84 128

11 Hyde Park Country Club 05/21/20 05/21/20 86 129

12 Hyde Park Country Club 06/01/20 06/01/20 79 131

13 Hyde Park Country Club 06/10/20 06/10/20 78 131

14 Hyde Park Country Club 06/14/20 06/14/20 74 129

15 Hyde Park Country Club 06/19/20 06/19/20 81 134

16 Hyde Park Country Club 06/21/20 06/21/20 84 128

17 Hyde Park Country Club 07/04/20 07/04/20 86 129

18 Hyde Park Country Club 07/06/20 07/06/20 79 131

19 Hyde Park Country Club 07/12/20 07/12/20 78 131

20 Hyde Park Country Club 07/14/20 07/14/20 74 129

21 Hyde Park Country Club 07/19/20 81 134

22 Hyde Park Country Club 07/20/20 07/20/20 84 128

23 Hyde Park Country Club 07/21/20 07/21/20 86 129

24 Hyde Park Country Club 07/25/20 79 131

25 Hyde Park Country Club 07/31/20 07/31/20 78 131

26 Hyde Park Country Club 08/03/20 08/03/20 74 129

27 Hyde Park Country Club 08/04/20 08/04/20 81 134

28 Hyde Park Country Club 08/07/20 08/07/20 84 128

29 Hyde Park Country Club 08/10/20 86 129

30 Hyde Park Country Club 08/11/20 08/11/20 79 131

31 Hyde Park Country Club 08/14/20 08/14/20 78 131

32 Hyde Park Country Club 08/22/20 08/22/20 74 129

33 Hyde Park Country Club 09/06/20 09/06/20 81 134

34 Hyde Park Country Club 09/10/20 09/10/20 84 128

35 Hyde Park Country Club 09/11/20 86 129

36 Hyde Park Country Club 09/14/20 09/14/20 79 131

37 Hyde Park Country Club 09/15/20 09/15/20 78 131

38 Hyde Park Country Club 10/10/20 10/10/20 74 129

39 Hyde Park Country Club 10/12/20 10/12/20 81 134

40 Hyde Park Country Club 10/13/20 10/13/20 84 128

41 Hyde Park Country Club 11/06/20 11/06/20 86 129

08/10/20

Export to Excel

05/09/20 Other

(8)
(9)
(10)
(11)
(12)
(13)
(14)
(15)
(16)
(17)

George Thurner

President/CEO

(513) 226-1281

References

Related documents

Inverse modeling of soil water content to estimate the hydraulic properties of a shallow soil and the associated weathered bedrock.. Ayral

For fifteen years, the Coronary Health Improvement Project (CHIP) has been help- ing people markedly reduce coronary risk factor levels by promoting healthier food choices

Changes in group membership (i.e., attrition) were evaluated at the group level and showed the highest rates with the heterogeneous groups and the lowest with the homogeneous

“Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright  2002, American Society for Engineering Education”..

[r]

NOTE : NO PASS OVER SHALL BE GRANTED IN THE FIRST FIVE MATTERS OF THE SUPPLEMENTARY LIST AND SHORT MATTER LIST.. NOTE : HON'BLE JUDGE SHALL HEAR FRESH INTERIM APPLICATIONS ON

The meta-data elements are grouped into five categories: 1) entity and attribute definitions, 2) pedigree, 3) spatial reference, 4) inventory procedures, and 5) data integrity.

According to Li (2007) the ones who realize traditional bullying are more inclined to torturing by using electronic communication devices when compared to the ones who do