STATE OF QATAR
NEW PORT PROJECT STEERING Committee
CONTAINER TERMINAL, INFRASTRUCTURE AND
UTILITY BUILDINGS
NPP/0026
DOCUMENT TITLE:
CONTAINER TERMINAL 1- BUILDINGS (D&B)
PHASE: DETAILED DESIGN
LIGHTNING PROTECTION RISK ASSESSMENT
CALCULATIONS
Document No.: NPP0026-TCC-CAL-EL-00001
TEYSEER CONTRACTING COMPANY WLL/ CONSOLIDATED CONTRACTORS GROUP S.A.L.
(OFFSHORE) (CCC) JV TCC/CCC JV
A ISSUED FOR REVIEW Renjith.P E.Koyess S.Sayegh
Rev Prepared by Reviewed by Approved by
Signature:
TEYSEER CONTRACTING COMPANY WLL / CONSOLIDATED CONTRACTORS GROUP S.A.L
(OFFSHORE) (CCC) JV
LIGHTNING PROTECTION RISK ASSESSMENT CALCULATIONS
DOC No. NPP0026-TCC-CAL-EL-00001 Page 2 of 97
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1. SCOPE: ... 3
2. REFERENCES: ... 3
3. EXPLANATION OF TERMS AS PER CLAUSE 4 OF 62305-2:... 3
3.1 Damage and Loss ... 3
3.1.1 Source of Damage ... 3
3.2 Type of damage ... 4
3.2.1 Type of loss ... 4
3.3 Risk and Risk Components ... 4
3.3.1 Risk ... 4
3.3.2 Composition of Risk Components Related to a Structure as Per Clause 4.3 of IEC 62305-2 . 5 3.3.3 Risk Components For A Structure Due To Flashes To The Struture... 5
3.3.4 Risk Components For A Structure Due To Flashes Near The Structure ... 6
4. Risk management: ... 6
4.1 Basic Procedure:... 6
4.2 Tolerable Risk (RT)... 7
4.3 Specific Procedure to Evaluate the Need of Protection... 7
5. The Results Summary... 8
5.1 Administration Building: For Detail Refer Attachment 3 ... 8
5.2 Administration Substation Building (CTAS): For Detail Refer Attachment 4 ... 8
5.3 Mosque: For Detail Refer Attachment 5 ... 9
5.4 Workshop Building: For Detail Refer Attachment 6 ... 10
5.5 Washdown Area : For Detail Refer Attachment 7 ... 10
5.6 Driver Reception Building: For Detail Refer Attachment 8 ... 11
5.7 Gate Complex Building: For Detail Refer Attachment 9 ... 12
5.8 Quayside Amenities Building: For Detail Refer Attachment 10 ... 13
TEYSEER CONTRACTING COMPANY WLL / CONSOLIDATED CONTRACTORS GROUP S.A.L
(OFFSHORE) (CCC) JV
LIGHTNING PROTECTION RISK ASSESSMENT CALCULATIONS
DOC No. NP0026-TCC-CAL-EL-00001 Page 3 of 97
1. SCOPE:
This document explores the necessity of lightning protection system for the Container Terminal -1 buildings under the Design & Build package of the New Port Project as per contract NPP/0026. The software “FURSE STRIKE RISK version 5.0” will be used in this project to calculate all types of risk and compare it with the tolerable values based on IEC 62305.
2. REFERENCES:
DPCT-TCC-RPT-GEN-00004 Basis of Design
NPP0026-TCC-SPC-EL-00001 Electrical Specification
IEC 62305-1 Protection Against lightning – General Principles IEC 62305-2 Protection Against lightning – Risk Management IEC 62305-3 Protection Against lightning – Physical Damage to
Structures and life hazard
3. EXPLANATION OF TERMS AS PER CLAUSE 4 OF IEC 62305-2: 3.1 Damage and Loss
3.1.1 Source of Damage
The lightning current is the primary source of damage. The following sources are distinguished by the strike attachment point as per table-1 of IEC 62305-2.
S1: Flash to a Structure S2: Flash near a structure S3: Flashes to a service S4: Flashes near a service
TEYSEER CONTRACTING COMPANY WLL / CONSOLIDATED CONTRACTORS GROUP S.A.L
(OFFSHORE) (CCC) JV
LIGHTNING PROTECTION RISK ASSESSMENT CALCULATIONS
DOC No. NPP0026-TCC-CAL-EL-00001 Page 4 of 97
3.2 Type of damage
A lightning flash may cause damage depending on the characteristics of the object to be protected. Some of the most important characteristics are: type of construction, contents and application, type of service and protection measures provided.
For practical application of this risk assessment, it is useful to distinguish between three basic types of damage which can appear as the consequence of lightning flashes. They
D1: Injury to living beings D2: Physical damage
D3: Failure of electrical and electronic systems
3.2.1 Type of loss
Each type of damage, alone or in combination with others, may produce a different consequential loss in the object to be protected. The type of loss that may occur depends on the characteristics of the objects itself and its content. The following types of loss will be taken into account;
L1: Loss of human life
L2: Loss of service to the public L3: Loss of cultural heritage
L4: Loss of economic value (Structure and its content)
3.3 Risk and Risk Components 3.3.1 Risk
The Risk R is the value of a probable average annual loss. For each type of loss which may appear in a structure or in a service, the relevant risk will be evaluated.
The risks to be evaluated in a structure may be as follows: R1: Risk of loss of human life
R2: Risk of loss of service to the public
R3: Risk of loss of cultural heritage
TEYSEER CONTRACTING COMPANY WLL / CONSOLIDATED CONTRACTORS GROUP S.A.L
(OFFSHORE) (CCC) JV
LIGHTNING PROTECTION RISK ASSESSMENT CALCULATIONS
DOC No. NPP0026-TCC-CAL-EL-00001 Page 5 of 97
The evaluate risks, R, the relevant risk components will be defined and calculated. For the D & B buildings, in general the risk component R1, R2 & R4 is considered for all the buildings. Risk
R3 (cultural heritage) is to be considered only for the Mosque.
Each risk, R, is the sum of risk components. When calculating a risk, the risk components may be grouped according to the source of damage and type of damage.
3.3.2 Composition of Risk Components Related to a Structure as Per Clause 4.3 of IEC 62305-2
Risk components to be considered for each type of loss in a structure are listed below:
R1: Risk of loss of human life:
R1 = RA + RB + RC + RM + RU + RV + RW + RZ
RC, RM, RW and RZ are not applicable as they are applicable only for structures with risk of
explosion and for hospitals with life-saving electrical equipment or other structures when failure of internal systems immediately endangers human life.
RU, RV and RW are the risk components to be considered due to the flashes to a line connected
to the structure. In this case, all D & B buildings are is not connected to overhead line and only connected through cables, thus the risk components are not applicable.
Therefore, R1 = RA + RB
R2: Risk of loss of service to the public:
R2 = RB + RC + RM + RV + RW + RZ
= RB + RC + RM
R3: Risk of loss of cultural heritage:
R3 = RB + RV
R4: Risk of loss of economic value:
R4 = RB + RC + RM + RV + RW + RZ
= RB + RC + RM
The above risk components equations corresponding to each type of loss are based on Page-51, Table-3 of IEC 62305-2
TEYSEER CONTRACTING COMPANY WLL / CONSOLIDATED CONTRACTORS GROUP S.A.L
(OFFSHORE) (CCC) JV
LIGHTNING PROTECTION RISK ASSESSMENT CALCULATIONS
DOC No. NPP0026-TCC-CAL-EL-00001 Page 6 of 97
RA: Component related to injury to living beings caused by touch and step voltages in the zones up to 3 m outside the structure. Loss of type L1 and, in the case of Loss of type L1 and, in the case of structures holding livestock, loss of type L4 with possible loss of animals may also arise.
RB: Component related to Physical damage caused by dangerous sparking inside the structure triggering fire or explosion, which may also endanger the environment. All type of loss (L1, L2, L3 and L4) may arise.
RC: Component related to failure of internal systems caused by LEMP (Lightning Electromagnetic Impulse). Loss of type L2 and L4 could occur in all cases along with type L1 in the case of structures with risk of explosion and hospitals or other structures where failure of internal system immediately endangers human life.
3.3.4 Risk Components For A Structure Due To Flashes Near The Structure
RM: Component related to failure of internal systems caused by LEMP (Lightning Electromagnetic impulse). Loss of type L2 and L4 could occur in all cases along with type L1 in case of structures with risk of explosion and hospitals or other structures where failure of internal system immediately endangers human life.
4. RISK MANAGEMENT: 4.1 Basic Procedure:
The decision to protect a structure or a service against lightning, as well as the protection of selection of protection measures, will be performed according to IEC 62305-2. The following procedure will be applied:
Identification of the object to be protected and its characteristics
Identification of all the types of loss in the object and the relevant corresponding risk R (R1 to R4)
Evaluation of risk R for each type of loss (R1 to R4)
Evaluation of need of protection, by comparison of risk R1, R2 and R3 for a structure with the tolerable risk RT
Evaluation of cost effectiveness of protection by comparison of the costs of total loss with and without protection measures. In this case, the assessment of components of risk R4 for a structure will be performed in order to evaluate such costs.
TEYSEER CONTRACTING COMPANY WLL / CONSOLIDATED CONTRACTORS GROUP S.A.L
(OFFSHORE) (CCC) JV
LIGHTNING PROTECTION RISK ASSESSMENT CALCULATIONS
DOC No. NPP0026-TCC-CAL-EL-00001 Page 7 of 97
4.2 Tolerable Risk (RT)
As per Clause 5.4 of IEC 62305-2 Table-7 Page-59,
Tolerable risk for Loss of human life or permanent injuries is 10-5. Tolerable risk for Loss of service to the public is 10-3
Tolerable risk for Loss of cultural heritage is 10-3
Tolerable risk for Loss of economic value is 10-3
4.3 Specific Procedure to Evaluate the Need of Protection
As per IEC 62305-1, the following risks will be considered in the evaluation of the need of protection against lightning for a structure:
Risks R1, R2 and R3
Besides the need for lightning protection for the object to be protected, it may be useful to evaluate the economic benefits of providing protection measures in order to reduce the economic loss L4.
In this case, the risk R4 of loss of economic values will be assessed. The assessment risk R4
allows the evaluation of the cost of the economic loss with and without the adopted protection measures.
For each risk to be considered, the following steps will be taken: Identification of the components RX which make up the risk,
Calculation of the identified risk components RX, Calculation of the total risk R,
Comparison of the risk R with tolerable value RT. If R ≤ RT, lightning protection is not necessary.
If R > RT protection measures will be adopted in order to reduce R ≤ RT for all risks to which the
object is subjected.
In D & B buildings, protection level shall be level four, therefore level four protection will be considered and all risks will be calculated based on that consideration and it will be proved that all the calculated risks are less than the tolerable risks values.
TEYSEER CONTRACTING COMPANY WLL / CONSOLIDATED CONTRACTORS GROUP S.A.L
(OFFSHORE) (CCC) JV
LIGHTNING PROTECTION RISK ASSESSMENT CALCULATIONS
DOC No. NPP0026-TCC-CAL-EL-00001 Page 8 of 97
5. THE RESULTS SUMMARY
5.1 Administration Building: For Detail Refer Attachment 3
Type of Risk Risk Calculated Value
Tolerable Value
Result
Loss of human life in the structure R1 8.9429E-06 1.0E-05 Safe
Loss of service to the public in the structure
R2 4.2585E-07 1.0E-03 Safe
Loss of cultural heritage in the structure
R3 2.1293E-08 1.0E-03 Safe
Loss of economic value in the structure
R4 2.3679E-03 1.0E-03 Safe
Conclusion: - As per the calculation R1, R2 and R4 is less than tolerable risk RT (As per table-7,
clause 5.4, Page 59 of IEC 62305-2). Hence the Lightning protection for the building is not
required.
However as an additional precautionary measure LPS Class IV will be provided for Administration & Amenities Building. Lightning protection will be provided through a system of meshed conductors spaced 20m x 20m (Refer page 31, table-2 of IEC 62305-3), and down conductors spaced at 20m (Refer page 39, table-4 of IEC 62305-3).Down conductor will be provided on the wall of the building and will be connected to the earth ring and dedicated earth electrodes. The lightning protection layout (DPCT-DD-EL-CT-GLP-00004) will be developed accordingly.
5.2 Administration Substation Building (CTAS): For Detail Refer Attachment 4
Type of Risk Risk Calculated Value
Tolerable Value
Result
Loss of human life in the structure R1 8.5252E-06 1.0E-05 Safe
Loss of service to the public in the structure
R2 8.8749E-07 1.0E-03 Safe
Loss of cultural heritage in the structure
TEYSEER CONTRACTING COMPANY WLL / CONSOLIDATED CONTRACTORS GROUP S.A.L
(OFFSHORE) (CCC) JV
LIGHTNING PROTECTION RISK ASSESSMENT CALCULATIONS
DOC No. NPP0026-TCC-CAL-EL-00001 Page 9 of 97
Loss of economic value in the structure
R4 4.8979E-06 1.0E-03 Safe
Conclusion: - As per the calculation R1, R2 and R4 is less than tolerable risk RT (As per table-7,
clause 5.4, Page 59 of IEC 62305-2). Hence the Lightning protection for the building is not
required.
However as an additional precautionary measure LPS Class IV will be provided for Administration Substation Building. Lightning protection will be provided through a system of meshed conductors spaced 20m x 20m (Refer page 31, table-2 of IEC 62305-3), and down conductors spaced at 20m (Refer page 39, table-4 of IEC 62305-3).Down conductor will be provided on the wall of the building and will be connected to the earth ring and dedicated earth electrodes. The lightning protection layout (DPCT-DD-EL-CT-GLP-00050) will be developed accordingly.
5.3 Mosque: For Detail Refer Attachment 5
Type of Risk Risk Calculated Value
Tolerable Value
Result
Loss of human life in the structure R1 1.9645E-07 1.0E-05 Safe
Loss of service to the public in the structure
R2 1.298E-05 1.0E-03 Safe
Loss of cultural heritage in the structure
R3 6.1391E-09 1.0E-03 Safe
Loss of economic value in the structure
R4 1.5313E-06 1.0E-03 Safe
Conclusion: - As per the calculation R1, R2 and R4 is less than tolerable risk RT (As per
table-7, clause 5.4, Page 59 of IEC 62305-2). Hence the Lightning protection for the building is
not required.
However as an additional precautionary measure LPS Class IV will be provided for Mosque. Lightning protection will be provided through a system of meshed conductors spaced 20m x 20m (Refer page 31, table-2 of IEC 62305-3), and down conductors spaced at 20m (Refer page 39, table-4 of IEC 62305-3).Down conductor will be provided on the wall of the building and will be connected to the earth ring and dedicated earth electrodes. The lightning protection layout (DPCT-DD-EL-CT-GLP-00044) will be developed accordingly.
TEYSEER CONTRACTING COMPANY WLL / CONSOLIDATED CONTRACTORS GROUP S.A.L
(OFFSHORE) (CCC) JV
LIGHTNING PROTECTION RISK ASSESSMENT CALCULATIONS
DOC No. NPP0026-TCC-CAL-EL-00001 Page 10 of 97
5.4 Workshop Building: For Detail Refer Attachment 6
Type of Risk Risk Calculated Value
Tolerable Value
Result
Loss of human life in the structure R1 8.442E-06 1.0E-05 Safe
Loss of service to the public in the structure
R2 1.5906E-05 1.0E-03 Safe
Loss of cultural heritage in the structure
R3 3.15E-09 1.0E-03 Safe
Loss of economic value in the structure
R4 2.2143E-05 1.0E-03 Safe
Conclusion: - As per the calculation R1, R2 and R4 is less than tolerable risk RT (As per
table-7, clause 5.4, Page 59 of IEC 62305-2). Hence the Lightning protection for the building is
not required.
However as an additional precautionary measure LPS Class IV will be provided for Workshop Building. Lightning protection will be provided by bonding the roof metallic structures (metallic structures as air-termination component – Refer page-35,caluse 5.2.5, & table-3 of IEC 62305-3) and provide bonding to the meshed conductors spaced 20m x 20m (Refer page 31, table-2 of IEC 62305-3), at the concrete roof area and down conductors spaced at 20m (Refer page 39, table-4 of IEC 62305-3).Down conductor will be provided on the wall of the structure / building and will be connected to the earth ring and dedicated earth electrodes. The lightning protection layout (DPCT-DD-EL-CT-GLP-00024) will be developed accordingly.
5.5 Washdown Area : For Detail Refer Attachment 7
a) REEFER WASH DOWN AREA
Type of Risk Risk Calculated Value
Tolerable Value
Result
Loss of human life in the structure R1 2.2491E-06 1.0E-05 Safe
Loss of service to the public in the structure
R2 3.9656E-05 1.0E-03 Safe
TEYSEER CONTRACTING COMPANY WLL / CONSOLIDATED CONTRACTORS GROUP S.A.L
(OFFSHORE) (CCC) JV
LIGHTNING PROTECTION RISK ASSESSMENT CALCULATIONS
DOC No. NPP0026-TCC-CAL-EL-00001 Page 11 of 97
structure
Loss of economic value in the structure
R4 8.1449E-05 1.0E-03 Safe
b) RTG WASH DOWN AREA
Type of Risk Risk Calculated Value
Tolerable Value
Result
Loss of human life in the structure R1 6.0522E-06 1.0E-05 Safe
Loss of service to the public in the structure
R2 9.1465E-05 1.0E-03 Safe
Loss of cultural heritage in the structure
R3 9.0331E-08 1.0E-03 Safe
Loss of economic value in the structure
R4 3.1639E-04 1.0E-03 Safe
Conclusion: - As per the calculation R1, R2 and R4 is less than tolerable risk RT (As per table-7,
clause 5.4, Page 59 of IEC 62305-2). Hence the Lightning protection for the building is not
required.
However as an additional precautionary measure LPS Class IV will be provided for Reefer & RTG Wash-down Area Buildings. Lightning protection will be provided by bonding the roof metallic structures (metallic structures as air-termination component – Refer
page-35,caluse 5.2.5, & table-3 of IEC 62305-3) and provide bonding to the meshed conductors spaced 20m x 20m (Refer page 31, table-2 of IEC 62305-3), at the concrete roof area and down conductors spaced at 20m (Refer page 39, table-4 of IEC 62305-3).Down conductor will be provided on the wall of the structure / building and will be connected to the earth ring and dedicated earth electrodes. The lightning protection layout (DPCT-DD-EL-CT-GLP-00029) will be developed accordingly.
5.6 Driver Reception Building: For Detail Refer Attachment 8
Type of Risk Risk Calculated Value
Tolerable Value
Result
Loss of human life in the structure R1 3.9309E-06 1.0E-05 Safe
TEYSEER CONTRACTING COMPANY WLL / CONSOLIDATED CONTRACTORS GROUP S.A.L
(OFFSHORE) (CCC) JV
LIGHTNING PROTECTION RISK ASSESSMENT CALCULATIONS
DOC No. NPP0026-TCC-CAL-EL-00001 Page 12 of 97
structure
Loss of cultural heritage in the structure
R3 2.3398E-08 1.0E-03 Safe
Loss of economic value in the structure
R4 1.4251E-05 1.0E-03 Safe
Conclusion: - As per the calculation R1, R2 and R4 is less than tolerable risk RT (As per
table-7, clause 5.4, Page 59 of IEC 62305-2). Hence the Lightning protection for the building is
not required.
However as an additional precautionary measure LPS Class IV will be provided for Driver Reception Building. Lightning protection will be provided through a system of meshed conductors spaced 20m x 20m (Refer page 31, table-2 of IEC 62305-3), and down conductors spaced at 20m (Refer page 39, table-4 of IEC 62305-3).Down conductor will be provided on the wall of the building and will be connected to the earth ring and dedicated earth electrodes. The lightning protection layout (DPCT-DD-EL-CT-GLP-00035) will be developed accordingly.
5.7 Gate Complex Building: For Detail Refer Attachment 9
a) GATE COMPLEX – CANOPY AREA
Type of Risk Risk Calculated Value
Tolerable Value
Result
Loss of human life in the structure R1 1.3092E-06 1.0E-05 Safe
Loss of service to the public in the structure
R2 1.7168E-05 1.0E-03 Safe
Loss of cultural heritage in the structure
R3 1.5585E-07 1.0E-03 Safe
Loss of economic value in the structure
R4 1.7324E-05 1.0E-03 Safe
b) GATE MANAGER AND FACILITIES BUILDING
Type of Risk Risk Calculated Value
Tolerable Value
TEYSEER CONTRACTING COMPANY WLL / CONSOLIDATED CONTRACTORS GROUP S.A.L
(OFFSHORE) (CCC) JV
LIGHTNING PROTECTION RISK ASSESSMENT CALCULATIONS
DOC No. NPP0026-TCC-CAL-EL-00001 Page 13 of 97
Loss of human life in the structure R1 6.2225E-07 1.0E-05 Safe
Loss of service to the public in the structure
R2 8.768E-06 1.0E-03 Safe
Loss of cultural heritage in the structure
R3 3.7039E-09 1.0E-03 Safe
Loss of economic value in the structure
R4 8.8421E-06 1.0E-03 Safe
Conclusion: - As per the calculation R1, R2 and R4 is less than tolerable risk RT (As per
table-7, clause 5.4, Page 59 of IEC 62305-2). Hence the Lightning protection for the building is
not required.
However as an additional precautionary measure LPS Class IV will be provided for Gate complex structures and Gate Manager Facilities Buildings. Lightning protection will be provided by bonding the roof metallic structures (metallic structures as air-termination component – Refer page-35,caluse 5.2.5, & table-3 of IEC 62305-3) and provide bonding to the meshed conductors spaced 20m x 20m (Refer page 31, table-2 of IEC 62305-3), at the concrete roof area and down conductors spaced at 20m (Refer page 39, table-4 of IEC 62305-3).Down conductor will be provided on the wall of the structure / building and will be connected to the earth ring and dedicated earth electrodes. The lightning protection layout (DD-EL-CT-GLP-00009 & DPCT-DD-EL-CT-GLP-00056) will be developed accordingly.
5.8 Quayside Amenities Building: For Detail Refer Attachment 10
Type of Risk Risk Calculated Value
Tolerable Value
Result
Loss of human life in the structure R1 1.6572E-06 1.0E-05 Safe
Loss of service to the public in the structure
R2 3.943E-05 1.0E-03 Safe
Loss of cultural heritage in the structure
R3 9.8643E-08 1.0E-03 Safe
Loss of economic value in the structure
TEYSEER CONTRACTING COMPANY WLL / CONSOLIDATED CONTRACTORS GROUP S.A.L
(OFFSHORE) (CCC) JV
LIGHTNING PROTECTION RISK ASSESSMENT CALCULATIONS
DOC No. NPP0026-TCC-CAL-EL-00001 Page 14 of 97
Conclusion: - As per the calculation R1, R2 and R4 is less than tolerable risk RT (As per
table-7, clause 5.4, Page 59 of IEC 62305-2). Hence the Lightning protection for the building is
not required.
However as an additional precautionary measure LPS Class IV will be provided for Quayside & Amenities Building – North & South. Lightning protection will be provided through a system of meshed conductors spaced 20m x 20m (Refer page 31, table-2 of IEC 62305-3), and down conductors spaced at 20m (Refer page 39, table-4 of IEC 62305-3).Down conductor will be provided on the wall of the building and will be connected to the earth ring and dedicated earth electrodes. The lightning protection layout (EL-CT-GLP-00014 & DPCT-DD-EL-CT-GLP-00018) will be developed accordingly
6. ATTACHMENTS
Attachment 1:- Isokeraunic Map (Map showing thunderstorm days per year throughout the world)
Attachment 2:- Mesh type air termination system on flat roof structure. (Extract from IEC 62305-3)
Attachment 3:- LIGHTNING RISK CALCULATION for Administration & Amenities Building. Attachment 4:- LIGHTNING RISK CALCULATION for Administration Substation Building. Attachment 5:- LIGHTNING RISK CALCULATION for Mosque Building.
Attachment 6:- LIGHTNING RISK CALCULATION for Workshop Building.
Attachment 7:- LIGHTNING RISK CALCULATION for Wash-down Area Buildings. Attachment 8:- LIGHTNING RISK CALCULATION for Driver Reception Building. Attachment 9:- LIGHTNING RISK CALCULATION for Gate area Buildings.
29
www.furse.com World thunderstorm days map | BS EN 62305-2
Figure 3.6: World Thunderstorm days map (BS EN 62305-2 Figure NK.2)
NPP0026-TCC-CAL-EL-00001 REV. A Page 15 of 97
62305-3 © IEC:2006 – 187 –
w
IEC 2142/05
Figure E.22a – LPS air-termination on a flat-roof structure
w
IEC 2143/05
Key
w Mesh size
NOTE The mesh size should comply with Table 2.
Figure E.22b – LPS air-termination on a sloped-roof structure
Copyright International Electrotechnical Commission
Provided by IHS under license with IEC Licensee=Oman/5940240038, User=Matuszewski, Leszek Not for Resale, 01/19/2010 03:47:44 MST
No reproduction or networking permitted without license from IHS
--``,`,`,`,,`````,``,,`,`,,`,```-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---NPP0026-TCC-CAL-EL-00001 REV. A Page 16 of 97
File: Administration and Amenities Building.src
Project details
BS EN 62305-2:2006 Risk Management Calculations
CONTAINER TERMINAL - 1 (D&B) Project name:
ADMINISTRATION & AMENITIES BUILDING Project title: Project address: Project ref: Calculation ref: Calculation notes: Project author: 15 February 2014 Created: 15 February 2014 Modified:
Case details
Administration and Amenities Building Case name: Case title: 05 February 2014 Created: 10 February 2014 Modified: Case notes:
Primary risk totals
R
1_T 8.9429E-06 Risk of loss of human life in the structureThe tolerable risk is not exceeded, no additional protection required
R
2_T 4.2585E-07 Risk of loss of service to the public in the structureThe tolerable risk is not exceeded, no additional protection required
R
3_T 2.1293E-08 Risk of loss of cultural heritage in the structureThe tolerable risk is not exceeded, no additional protection required
R
4_T 2.3679E-03 Risk of loss of economic value in the structureStrikeRisk Version 5.0 Run identification 2/15/2014 1:27:50PM Page 1 of 11
NPP0026-TCC-CAL-EL-00001 REV. A Page 17 of 97
File: Administration and Amenities Building.src
Protection system design parameters
LPL IVLPS Protect the structure with a Class LPL IV Lightning Protection System in accordance with BS EN 62305-3
Imax 100.00kA Maximum peak current
97.00% Probability that lightning current parameters are smaller than the maximum value defined above
Imin 16.00kA Minimum peak current
84.00% Probability that lightning current parameters are greater than the minimum value defined above
60.00m Radius of rolling sphere
ISPD 16.67kA Maximum peak current of equipotential bonding SPD's for each of 'n' lines defined (based upon simple current division concept)
NOTE: The worst case surge that could be expected on a two-wire telephone or data line is 2.5kA (10/350 µs) per line (Category D test to BS EN 61643-21) to earth or 5 kA (10/350 µs) per pair.
Line 1 Protect Line 1 at its entrance to the structure with a standard equipotential bonding SPD (rated to ISPD above) in accordance with
BS EN 62305-3
NOTE: Where SPDs are required but an LPS is not (ISPD = 0), protect overhead lines with Type 1 SPDs (mains 12.5kA 10/350µs, data/telecom 2.5kA 10/350µs), protect underground lines with overvoltage or Type 2 SPDs (tested with an 8/20 µs waveform)
Line 2 Protect Line 2 at its entrance to the structure with a standard equipotential bonding SPD (rated to ISPD above) in accordance with
BS EN 62305-3
NOTE: Where SPDs are required but an LPS is not (ISPD = 0), protect overhead lines with Type 1 SPDs (mains 12.5kA 10/350µs, data/telecom 2.5kA 10/350µs), protect underground lines with overvoltage or Type 2 SPDs (tested with an 8/20 µs waveform)
Line 3 Protect Line 3 at its entrance to the structure with a standard equipotential bonding SPD (rated to ISPD above) in accordance with
BS EN 62305-3
NOTE: Where SPDs are required but an LPS is not (ISPD = 0), protect overhead lines with Type 1 SPDs (mains 12.5kA 10/350µs, data/telecom 2.5kA 10/350µs), protect underground lines with overvoltage or Type 2 SPDs (tested with an 8/20 µs waveform)
Environment
N
g 1.00 Lightning flash density (Flashes/km²/year)C
d 0.50 Location factorC
e 0.10 Environmental factorRho 3.00 W m Soil resistivity (Ohm metres)
StrikeRisk Version 5.0 Run identification 2/15/2014 1:27:50PM Page 2 of 11
File: Administration and Amenities Building.src
Assessment of A
x- Collection areas (BS EN 62305-2 Annex A.2)
A
d/b 21,287.71 m² Collection area of primary structureA
m 236,679.06 m² Collection area of surrounding groundA
l (L1) 10.74 m² Collection area of flashes striking line 1A
l (L2) 19.40 m² Collection area of flashes striking line 2A
l (L3) 36.72 m² Collection area of flashes striking line 3A
l 66.86 m² Total collection area of flashes striking linesA
i (L1) 2,814.58 m² Collection area of flashes near line 1A
i (L2) 3,031.09 m² Collection area of flashes near line 2A
i (L3) 3,464.10 m² Collection area of flashes near line 3A
i 9,309.77 m² Total collection area of flashes near linesStructures
Primary structure
Structure ID: - Rectangular with a flat roof
L
b 56.40 m Length of primary structureW
b 21.80 m Width of primary structureH
b 19.60 m Height of primary structureSecondary structures
StrikeRisk Version 5.0 Run identification 2/15/2014 1:27:50PM Page 3 of 11
File: Administration and Amenities Building.src
Lines
Line 1 LV Cables Incomer 1
K
S3 (L1) 0.02 Factor relevant to the characteristics of internal wiring for line 1P
SPD (L1) Probability of failure of internal systems or a service when SPDs areprovided for equipotential bonding (in accordance with BS EN 62305-3) for line 1
0.03
P
SPDc (L1) Probability of failure of internal systems or a service when coordinated SPDsare provided (in accordance with BS EN 62305-4) for line 1 1.00
C
t (L1) 1.00 Correction factor for a hv/lv transformer on line 1C
dc (L1) 0.25 Location factor for line 1U
w (L1) 2.50 kV Rated impulse withstand voltage of a system connected to line 1L
c (L1) 65.00 m Length of line 1H
c (L1) 0.00 m Height of the conductors above ground for line 1Line 2 LV Cable Incomer 2
K
S3 (L2) 1.00 Factor relevant to the characteristics of internal wiring for line 2P
SPD (L2) Probability of failure of internal systems or a service when SPDs areprovided for equipotential bonding (in accordance with BS EN 62305-3) for line 2
0.03
P
SPDc (L2) Probability of failure of internal systems or a service when coordinated SPDsare provided (in accordance with BS EN 62305-4) for line 2 1.00
C
t (L2) 1.00 Correction factor for a hv/lv transformer on line 2C
dc (L2) 0.25 Location factor for line 2U
w (L2) 2.50 kV Rated impulse withstand voltage of a system connected to line 2L
c (L2) 70.00 m Length of line 2H
c (L2) 0.00 m Height of the conductors above ground for line 2Line 3 LV Cable Incomer 3
K
S3 (L3) 1.00 Factor relevant to the characteristics of internal wiring for line 3P
SPD (L3) Probability of failure of internal systems or a service when SPDs areprovided for equipotential bonding (in accordance with BS EN 62305-3) for line 3
0.03
P
SPDc (L3) Probability of failure of internal systems or a service when coordinated SPDsare provided (in accordance with BS EN 62305-4) for line 3 1.00
C
t (L3) 1.00 Correction factor for a hv/lv transformer on line 3C
dc (L3) 0.25 Location factor for line 3U
w (L3) 2.50 kV Rated impulse withstand voltage of a system connected to line 3L
c (L3) 80.00 m Length of line 3H
c (L3) 0.00 m Height of the conductors above ground for line 3StrikeRisk Version 5.0 Run identification 2/15/2014 1:27:50PM Page 4 of 11
File: Administration and Amenities Building.src
Zones
Zone 10 Zone 9 Zone 8 Zone 7 Zone 6 Zone 5 Zone 4 Zone 3 Zone 2 Zone 1 Factorr
p 2.0E-01 5.0E-01r
f 1.0E-02 1.0E-02r
a/ r
u 1.0E-02 1.0E-02h
z1 5 2h
z4 1 1L
t1 1.0E-04 0.0E00L
f1 4.2E-01 4.2E-01L
o1 0.0E00 0.0E00L
f2 1.0E-01 1.0E-01L
o2 0.0E00 1.0E-02L
f3 1.0E-02 1.0E-02L
t4 0.0E00 0.0E00L
f4 2.0E-01 2.0E-01L
o4 1.0E-02 0.0E00Assessment of N
x- Annual number of dangerous events (BS EN 62305-2 Annex A)
N
d/b 0.010644 Average number of flashes to main structureN
m 0.226035 Average number of flashes to surrounding groundN
l (L1) 0.000003 Average number of flashes to line 1N
l (L2) 0.000005 Average number of flashes to line 2N
l (L3) 0.000009 Average number of flashes to line 3N
i (L1) 0.000281 Average number of flashes near line 1N
i (L2) 0.000303 Average number of flashes near line 2N
i (L3) 0.000346 Average number of flashes near line 3StrikeRisk Version 5.0 Run identification 2/15/2014 1:27:50PM Page 5 of 11
File: Administration and Amenities Building.src
Assessment of P
x- Probability of damage for a structure (BS EN 62305-2 Annex NB)
Factor Zone 1 Zone 2 Zone 3 Zone 4 Zone 5 Zone 6 Zone 7 Zone 8 Zone 9 Zone 10
0 0
P
A 0.2P
B 1P
C (L1) 1P
C (L2) 1P
C (L3) 1P
C 1K
S1 1 NAK
S2 0.6K
S4 (L1) 0.6K
S4 (L2) 0.6K
S4 (L3) 1.2E-02 NAK
MS (L1) 6.0E-01 NAK
MS (L2) 6.0E-01 NAK
MS (L3) 1.0E-04 NAP
MS (L1) 1.08E00 NAP
MS (L2) 1.08E00 NAP
MS (L3) 1.0E-04 NAP
M (L1) 1.0E00 NAP
M (L2) 1.0E00 NAP
M (L3) 1.0E00 NAP
M 6.0E-01P
LD (L1) 6.0E-01P
LD (L2) 6.0E-01P
LD (L3) 2.0E-02P
LI (L1) 2.0E-02P
LI (L2) 2.0E-02P
LI (L3) 3.0E-02P
U (L1) 3.0E-02P
U (L2) 3.0E-02P
U (L3) 3.0E-02P
V (L1) 3.0E-02P
V (L2) 3.0E-02P
V (L3) 6.0E-01P
W (L1)StrikeRisk Version 5.0 Run identification 2/15/2014 1:27:50PM Page 6 of 11
File: Administration and Amenities Building.src 6.0E-01
P
W (L2) 6.0E-01P
W (L3) 2.0E-02P
Z (L1) 2.0E-02P
Z (L2) 2.0E-02P
Z (L3)Assessment of L
x- Amount of loss for a structure (BS EN 62305-2 Annex NC)
Zone 10 Zone 9 Zone 8 Zone 7 Zone 6 Zone 5 Zone 4 Zone 3 Zone 2 Zone 1 Factor
Loss factors relevant to R
11.0E-06 0.0E00
L
A 4.2E-03 4.2E-03L
B 0.0E00 0.0E00L
C 0.0E00 0.0E00L
M 1.0E-06 0.0E00L
U 4.2E-03 4.2E-03L
V 0.0E00 0.0E00L
W 0.0E00 0.0E00L
Z Zone 10 Zone 9 Zone 8 Zone 7 Zone 6 Zone 5 Zone 4 Zone 3 Zone 2 Zone 1 FactorLoss factors relevant to R
22.0E-04 5.0E-04
L
B 0.0E00 1.0E-02L
C 0.0E00 1.0E-02L
M 2.0E-04 5.0E-04L
V 0.0E00 1.0E-02L
W 0.0E00 1.0E-02L
Z Zone 10 Zone 9 Zone 8 Zone 7 Zone 6 Zone 5 Zone 4 Zone 3 Zone 2 Zone 1 FactorLoss factors relevant to R
31.0E-05 2.5E-05
L
B1.0E-05 2.5E-05
L
VStrikeRisk Version 5.0 Run identification 2/15/2014 1:27:50PM Page 7 of 11
File: Administration and Amenities Building.src Zone 10 Zone 9 Zone 8 Zone 7 Zone 6 Zone 5 Zone 4 Zone 3 Zone 2 Zone 1 Factor
Loss factors relevant to R
40.0E00 0.0E00
L
A 4.0E-04 1.0E-03L
B 1.0E-02 0.0E00L
C 1.0E-02 0.0E00L
M 0.0E00 0.0E00L
U 4.0E-04 1.0E-03L
V 1.0E-02 0.0E00L
W 1.0E-02 0.0E00L
ZAssessment of R
x- Risk components
Zone 10 Zone 9 Zone 8 Zone 7 Zone 6 Zone 5 Zone 4 Zone 3 Zone 2 Zone 1 Factor
Risk components relevant to R
10.0E00 0.0E00
R
A 8.9408E-06 0.0E00R
B 0.0E00 0.0E00R
C 0.0E00 0.0E00R
M 0.0E00 0.0E00R
U (L1) 0.0E00 0.0E00R
U (L2) 0.0E00 0.0E00R
U (L3) 3.3827E-10 0.0E00R
V (L1) 6.1107E-10 0.0E00R
V (L2) 1.1567E-09 0.0E00R
V (L3) 0.0E00 0.0E00R
W (L1) 0.0E00 0.0E00R
W (L2) 0.0E00 0.0E00R
W (L3) 0.0E00 0.0E00R
Z (L1) 0.0E00 0.0E00R
Z (L2) 0.0E00 0.0E00R
Z (L3)StrikeRisk Version 5.0 Run identification 2/15/2014 1:27:50PM Page 8 of 11
File: Administration and Amenities Building.src Zone 10 Zone 9 Zone 8 Zone 7 Zone 6 Zone 5 Zone 4 Zone 3 Zone 2 Zone 1 Factor
Risk components relevant to R
24.2575E-07 0.0E00
R
B 0.0E00 0.0E00R
C 0.0E00 0.0E00R
M 1.6108E-11 0.0E00R
V (L1) 2.9098E-11 0.0E00R
V (L2) 5.5079E-11 0.0E00R
V (L3) 0.0E00 0.0E00R
W (L1) 0.0E00 0.0E00R
W (L2) 0.0E00 0.0E00R
W (L3) 0.0E00 0.0E00R
Z (L1) 0.0E00 0.0E00R
Z (L2) 0.0E00 0.0E00R
Z (L3) Zone 10 Zone 9 Zone 8 Zone 7 Zone 6 Zone 5 Zone 4 Zone 3 Zone 2 Zone 1 FactorRisk components relevant to R
32.1288E-08 0.0E00
R
B 8.054E-13 0.0E00R
V (L1) 1.4549E-12 0.0E00R
V (L2) 2.754E-12 0.0E00R
V (L3)StrikeRisk Version 5.0 Run identification 2/15/2014 1:27:50PM Page 9 of 11
File: Administration and Amenities Building.src Zone 10 Zone 9 Zone 8 Zone 7 Zone 6 Zone 5 Zone 4 Zone 3 Zone 2 Zone 1 Factor
Risk components relevant to R
40.0E00 0.0E00
R
A 8.5151E-07 0.0E00R
B 1.0644E-04 0.0E00R
C 2.2604E-03 0.0E00R
M 0.0E00 0.0E00R
U (L1) 0.0E00 0.0E00R
U (L2) 0.0E00 0.0E00R
U (L3) 3.2216E-11 0.0E00R
V (L1) 5.8197E-11 0.0E00R
V (L2) 1.1016E-10 0.0E00R
V (L3) 1.6108E-08 0.0E00R
W (L1) 2.9098E-08 0.0E00R
W (L2) 5.5079E-08 0.0E00R
W (L3) 5.5755E-08 0.0E00R
Z (L1) 5.9652E-08 0.0E00R
Z (L2) 6.7446E-08 0.0E00R
Z (L3)Primary risk totals
R
1_T 8.9429E-06 Risk of loss of human life in the structureR
2_T 4.2585E-07 Risk of loss of service to the public in the structureR
3_T 2.1293E-08 Risk of loss of cultural heritage in the structureR
4_T 2.3679E-03 Risk of loss of economic value in the structurePrimary risk with respect to source of damage
R
1_D 8.9408E-06 Risk of loss of human life in the structure due to flashes to the structure (S1)R
2_D 4.2575E-07 Risk of loss of service to the public in the structure due to flashes to the structure (S1)R
3_D 2.1288E-08 Risk of loss of cultural heritage in the structure due to flashes to the structure (S1)R
4_D 1.0729E-04 Risk of loss of economic value in the structure due to flashes to the structure (S1)R
1_I Risk of loss of human life in the structure due to flashes influencing, but notstriking the structure (S2, S3, S4) 2.106E-09
R
2_I Risk of loss of service to the public in the structure due to flashes influencing, but notstriking the structure (S2, S3, S4) 1.0029E-10
R
3_I Risk of loss of cultural heritage in the structure due to flashes influencing, but notstriking the structure (S2, S3, S4) 5.0143E-12
R
4_I Risk of loss of economic value in the structure due to flashes influencing, but notstriking the structure (S2, S3, S4) 2.2606E-03
StrikeRisk Version 5.0 Run identification 2/15/2014 1:27:50PM Page 10 of 11
File: Administration and Amenities Building.src
Primary risk with respect to type of damage
R
1_S 0.E00 Risk of loss of human life in the structure due to injury to living beings (D1)R
2_S 0.E00 Risk of loss of service to the public in the structure due to injury to living beings (D1)R
3_S 0.E00 Risk of loss of cultural heritage in the structure due to injury to living beings (D1)R
4_S 0.E00 Risk of loss of economic value in the structure due to injury to living beings (D1)R
1_F 8.9429E-06 Risk of loss of human life in the structure due to physical damage (D2)R
2_F 4.2585E-07 Risk of loss of service to the public in the structure due to physical damage (D2)R
3_F 8.9429E-06 Risk of loss of cultural heritage in the structure due to physical damage (D2)R
4_F 8.5171E-07 Risk of loss of economic value in the structure due to physical damage (D2)R
1_O 0.E00 Risk of loss of human life in the structure due to failure of internal systems (D3)R
2_O 0.E00 Risk of loss of service to the public in the structure due to failure of internal systems (D3)R
3_O 0.E00 Risk of loss of cultural heritage in the structure due to failure of internal systems (D3)R
4_O 2.3671E-03 Risk of loss of economic value in the structure due to failure of internal systems (D3)StrikeRisk Version 5.0 Run identification 2/15/2014 1:27:50PM Page 11 of 11
File: Administration Substation.src
Project details
BS EN 62305-2:2006 Risk Management Calculations
CONTAINER TERMINAL -1 (D&B) Project name:
ADMINISTRATION SUBSTATION (CTAS) Project title: Project address: Project ref: Calculation ref: Calculation notes: Project author: 13 February 2014 Created: 13 February 2014 Modified:
Case details
Administration Substation (CTAS) Case name: Substation (CTAS) Case title: 08 February 2014 Created: 12 February 2014 Modified: Case notes:
Primary risk totals
R
1_T 8.5252E-06 Risk of loss of human life in the structureThe tolerable risk is not exceeded, no additional protection required
R
2_T 8.8749E-07 Risk of loss of service to the public in the structureThe tolerable risk is not exceeded, no additional protection required
R
3_T 1.0283E-08 Risk of loss of cultural heritage in the structureThe tolerable risk is not exceeded, no additional protection required
R
4_T 4.8979E-06 Risk of loss of economic value in the structureStrikeRisk Version 5.0 Run identification 2/13/2014 6:31:54PM Page 1 of 11
NPP0026-TCC-CAL-EL-00001 REV. A Page 28 of 97
File: Administration Substation.src
Protection system design parameters
LPL IVLPS Protect the structure with a Class LPL IV Lightning Protection System in accordance with BS EN 62305-3
Imax 100.00kA Maximum peak current
97.00% Probability that lightning current parameters are smaller than the maximum value defined above
Imin 16.00kA Minimum peak current
84.00% Probability that lightning current parameters are greater than the minimum value defined above
60.00m Radius of rolling sphere
ISPD 16.67kA Maximum peak current of equipotential bonding SPD's for each of 'n' lines defined (based upon simple current division concept)
NOTE: The worst case surge that could be expected on a two-wire telephone or data line is 2.5kA (10/350 µs) per line (Category D test to BS EN 61643-21) to earth or 5 kA (10/350 µs) per pair.
Line 1 Protect Line 1 at its entrance to the structure with a enhanced equipotential bonding SPD (rated to ISPD above) in accordance with
BS EN 62305-3
NOTE: Where SPDs are required but an LPS is not (ISPD = 0), protect overhead lines with Type 1 SPDs (mains 12.5kA 10/350µs, data/telecom 2.5kA 10/350µs), protect underground lines with overvoltage or Type 2 SPDs (tested with an 8/20 µs waveform)
Protect all internal systems connected to Line 1 with a coordinated set of enhancedSPDs in accordance with BS EN 62305-4
Line 2 Protect Line 2 at its entrance to the structure with a enhanced equipotential bonding SPD (rated to ISPD above) in accordance with
BS EN 62305-3
NOTE: Where SPDs are required but an LPS is not (ISPD = 0), protect overhead lines with Type 1 SPDs (mains 12.5kA 10/350µs, data/telecom 2.5kA 10/350µs), protect underground lines with overvoltage or Type 2 SPDs (tested with an 8/20 µs waveform)
Protect all internal systems connected to Line 2 with a coordinated set of enhancedSPDs in accordance with BS EN 62305-4
Line 3 Protect Line 3 at its entrance to the structure with a enhanced equipotential bonding SPD (rated to ISPD above) in accordance with
BS EN 62305-3
NOTE: Where SPDs are required but an LPS is not (ISPD = 0), protect overhead lines with Type 1 SPDs (mains 12.5kA 10/350µs, data/telecom 2.5kA 10/350µs), protect underground lines with overvoltage or Type 2 SPDs (tested with an 8/20 µs waveform)
Protect all internal systems connected to Line 3 with a coordinated set of enhancedSPDs in accordance with BS EN 62305-4
Environment
N
g 1.00 Lightning flash density (Flashes/km²/year)C
d 0.25 Location factorC
e 0.50 Environmental factorRho 3.00 W m Soil resistivity (Ohm metres)
StrikeRisk Version 5.0 Run identification 2/13/2014 6:31:54PM Page 2 of 11
File: Administration Substation.src
Assessment of A
x- Collection areas (BS EN 62305-2 Annex A.2)
A
d/b 4,111.87 m² Collection area of primary structureA
m 212,368.93 m² Collection area of surrounding groundA
l (L1) 127.22 m² Collection area of flashes striking line 1A
l (L2) 127.22 m² Collection area of flashes striking line 2A
l (L3) 40.62 m² Collection area of flashes striking line 3A
l 295.05 m² Total collection area of flashes striking linesA
i (L1) 4,330.13 m² Collection area of flashes near line 1A
i (L2) 4,330.13 m² Collection area of flashes near line 2A
i (L3) 2,165.06 m² Collection area of flashes near line 3A
i 10,825.32 m² Total collection area of flashes near linesStructures
Primary structure
Structure ID: - Rectangular with a flat roof
L
b 21.30 m Length of primary structureW
b 10.30 m Width of primary structureH
b 8.85 m Height of primary structureSecondary structures
StrikeRisk Version 5.0 Run identification 2/13/2014 6:31:54PM Page 3 of 11
File: Administration Substation.src
Lines
Line 1 Main HV Cable entry (Ring circuit 1)
K
S3 (L1) 0.00 Factor relevant to the characteristics of internal wiring for line 1P
SPD (L1) Probability of failure of internal systems or a service when SPDs areprovided for equipotential bonding (in accordance with BS EN 62305-3) for line 1
0.00
P
SPDc (L1) Probability of failure of internal systems or a service when coordinated SPDsare provided (in accordance with BS EN 62305-4) for line 1 0.00
C
t (L1) 0.20 Correction factor for a hv/lv transformer on line 1C
dc (L1) 0.25 Location factor for line 1U
w (L1) 6.00 kV Rated impulse withstand voltage of a system connected to line 1L
c (L1) 100.00 m Length of line 1H
c (L1) 0.00 m Height of the conductors above ground for line 1Line 2 Main HV Cable entry (Ring circuit 2)
K
S3 (L2) 0.00 Factor relevant to the characteristics of internal wiring for line 2P
SPD (L2) Probability of failure of internal systems or a service when SPDs areprovided for equipotential bonding (in accordance with BS EN 62305-3) for line 2
0.00
P
SPDc (L2) Probability of failure of internal systems or a service when coordinated SPDsare provided (in accordance with BS EN 62305-4) for line 2 0.00
C
t (L2) 0.20 Correction factor for a hv/lv transformer on line 2C
dc (L2) 0.25 Location factor for line 2U
w (L2) 6.00 kV Rated impulse withstand voltage of a system connected to line 2L
c (L2) 100.00 m Length of line 2H
c (L2) 0.00 m Height of the conductors above ground for line 2Line 3 LV Cable - Standby Generator
K
S3 (L3) 0.00 Factor relevant to the characteristics of internal wiring for line 3P
SPD (L3) Probability of failure of internal systems or a service when SPDs areprovided for equipotential bonding (in accordance with BS EN 62305-3) for line 3
0.00
P
SPDc (L3) Probability of failure of internal systems or a service when coordinated SPDsare provided (in accordance with BS EN 62305-4) for line 3 0.00
C
t (L3) 1.00 Correction factor for a hv/lv transformer on line 3C
dc (L3) 0.25 Location factor for line 3U
w (L3) 2.50 kV Rated impulse withstand voltage of a system connected to line 3L
c (L3) 50.00 m Length of line 3H
c (L3) 0.00 m Height of the conductors above ground for line 3StrikeRisk Version 5.0 Run identification 2/13/2014 6:31:54PM Page 4 of 11
File: Administration Substation.src
Zones
Zone 10 Zone 9 Zone 8 Zone 7 Zone 6 Zone 5 Zone 4 Zone 3 Zone 2 Zone 1 Factorr
p 5.0E-01 5.0E-01r
f 1.0E-02 1.0E-02r
a/ r
u 1.0E-02 1.0E-04h
z1 2 2h
z4 20 1L
t1 0.0E00 0.0E00L
f1 3.3E-01 3.3E-01L
o1 1.0E-01 1.0E-01L
f2 1.0E-01 1.0E-01L
o2 1.0E-02 1.0E-02L
f3 1.0E-02 1.0E-01L
t4 0.0E00 0.0E00L
f4 2.0E-01 5.0E-01L
o4 1.0E-02 1.0E-02Assessment of N
x- Annual number of dangerous events (BS EN 62305-2 Annex A)
N
d/b 0.001028 Average number of flashes to main structureN
m 0.211341 Average number of flashes to surrounding groundN
l (L1) 0.000006 Average number of flashes to line 1N
l (L2) 0.000006 Average number of flashes to line 2N
l (L3) 0.000010 Average number of flashes to line 3N
i (L1) 0.000433 Average number of flashes near line 1N
i (L2) 0.000433 Average number of flashes near line 2N
i (L3) 0.001083 Average number of flashes near line 3StrikeRisk Version 5.0 Run identification 2/13/2014 6:31:54PM Page 5 of 11
File: Administration Substation.src
Assessment of P
x- Probability of damage for a structure (BS EN 62305-2 Annex NB)
Factor Zone 1 Zone 2 Zone 3 Zone 4 Zone 5 Zone 6 Zone 7 Zone 8 Zone 9 Zone 10
0 0
P
A 0.2P
B 0.003P
C (L1) 0.003P
C (L2) 0.003P
C (L3) 8.97302700000002E-03P
C 1K
S1 1 NAK
S2 0.25K
S4 (L1) 0.25K
S4 (L2) 0.6K
S4 (L3) 5.0E-05 NAK
MS (L1) 5.0E-05 NAK
MS (L2) 1.2E-04 NAK
MS (L3) 1.0E-04 NAP
MS (L1) 1.0E-04 NAP
MS (L2) 1.0E-04 NAP
MS (L3) 1.0E-04 NAP
M (L1) 1.0E-04 NAP
M (L2) 1.0E-04 NAP
M (L3) 2.9997E-04 NAP
M 1.0E-01P
LD (L1) 1.0E-01P
LD (L2) 6.0E-01P
LD (L3) 4.0E-03P
LI (L1) 4.0E-03P
LI (L2) 2.0E-02P
LI (L3) 3.0E-03P
U (L1) 3.0E-03P
U (L2) 3.0E-03P
U (L3) 3.0E-03P
V (L1) 3.0E-03P
V (L2) 3.0E-03P
V (L3) 3.0E-03P
W (L1)StrikeRisk Version 5.0 Run identification 2/13/2014 6:31:54PM Page 6 of 11
File: Administration Substation.src 3.0E-03
P
W (L2) 3.0E-03P
W (L3) 3.0E-03P
Z (L1) 3.0E-03P
Z (L2) 3.0E-03P
Z (L3)Assessment of L
x- Amount of loss for a structure (BS EN 62305-2 Annex NC)
Zone 10 Zone 9 Zone 8 Zone 7 Zone 6 Zone 5 Zone 4 Zone 3 Zone 2 Zone 1 Factor
Loss factors relevant to R
10.0E00 0.0E00
L
A 3.3E-03 3.3E-03L
B 1.0E-01 1.0E-01L
C 1.0E-01 1.0E-01L
M 0.0E00 0.0E00L
U 3.3E-03 3.3E-03L
V 1.0E-01 1.0E-01L
W 1.0E-01 1.0E-01L
Z Zone 10 Zone 9 Zone 8 Zone 7 Zone 6 Zone 5 Zone 4 Zone 3 Zone 2 Zone 1 FactorLoss factors relevant to R
25.0E-04 5.0E-04
L
B 1.0E-02 1.0E-02L
C 1.0E-02 1.0E-02L
M 5.0E-04 5.0E-04L
V 1.0E-02 1.0E-02L
W 1.0E-02 1.0E-02L
Z Zone 10 Zone 9 Zone 8 Zone 7 Zone 6 Zone 5 Zone 4 Zone 3 Zone 2 Zone 1 FactorLoss factors relevant to R
35.0E-05 5.0E-04
L
B5.0E-05 5.0E-04
L
VStrikeRisk Version 5.0 Run identification 2/13/2014 6:31:54PM Page 7 of 11
File: Administration Substation.src Zone 10 Zone 9 Zone 8 Zone 7 Zone 6 Zone 5 Zone 4 Zone 3 Zone 2 Zone 1 Factor
Loss factors relevant to R
40.0E00 0.0E00
L
A 2.0E-02 2.5E-03L
B 1.0E-02 1.0E-02L
C 1.0E-02 1.0E-02L
M 0.0E00 0.0E00L
U 2.0E-02 2.5E-03L
V 1.0E-02 1.0E-02L
W 1.0E-02 1.0E-02L
ZAssessment of R
x- Risk components
Zone 10 Zone 9 Zone 8 Zone 7 Zone 6 Zone 5 Zone 4 Zone 3 Zone 2 Zone 1 Factor
Risk components relevant to R
10.0E00 0.0E00
R
A 6.7846E-07 0.0E00R
B 9.224E-07 0.0E00R
C 6.3396E-06 0.0E00R
M 0.0E00 0.0E00R
U (L1) 0.0E00 0.0E00R
U (L2) 0.0E00 0.0E00R
U (L3) 6.2973E-11 0.0E00R
V (L1) 6.2973E-11 0.0E00R
V (L2) 1.0053E-10 0.0E00R
V (L3) 1.9083E-09 0.0E00R
W (L1) 1.9083E-09 0.0E00R
W (L2) 3.0462E-09 0.0E00R
W (L3) 1.28E-07 0.0E00R
Z (L1) 1.28E-07 0.0E00R
Z (L2) 3.2171E-07 0.0E00R
Z (L3)StrikeRisk Version 5.0 Run identification 2/13/2014 6:31:54PM Page 8 of 11
File: Administration Substation.src Zone 10 Zone 9 Zone 8 Zone 7 Zone 6 Zone 5 Zone 4 Zone 3 Zone 2 Zone 1 Factor
Risk components relevant to R
21.028E-07 0.0E00
R
B 9.224E-08 0.0E00R
C 6.3396E-07 0.0E00R
M 9.5414E-12 0.0E00R
V (L1) 9.5414E-12 0.0E00R
V (L2) 1.5231E-11 0.0E00R
V (L3) 1.9083E-10 0.0E00R
W (L1) 1.9083E-10 0.0E00R
W (L2) 3.0462E-10 0.0E00R
W (L3) 1.28E-08 0.0E00R
Z (L1) 1.28E-08 0.0E00R
Z (L2) 3.2171E-08 0.0E00R
Z (L3) Zone 10 Zone 9 Zone 8 Zone 7 Zone 6 Zone 5 Zone 4 Zone 3 Zone 2 Zone 1 FactorRisk components relevant to R
31.028E-08 0.0E00
R
B 9.5414E-13 0.0E00R
V (L1) 9.5414E-13 0.0E00R
V (L2) 1.5231E-12 0.0E00R
V (L3)StrikeRisk Version 5.0 Run identification 2/13/2014 6:31:54PM Page 9 of 11
File: Administration Substation.src Zone 10 Zone 9 Zone 8 Zone 7 Zone 6 Zone 5 Zone 4 Zone 3 Zone 2 Zone 1 Factor
Risk components relevant to R
40.0E00 0.0E00
R
A 4.1119E-06 0.0E00R
B 9.224E-08 0.0E00R
C 6.3396E-07 0.0E00R
M 0.0E00 0.0E00R
U (L1) 0.0E00 0.0E00R
U (L2) 0.0E00 0.0E00R
U (L3) 3.8166E-10 0.0E00R
V (L1) 3.8166E-10 0.0E00R
V (L2) 6.0925E-10 0.0E00R
V (L3) 1.9083E-10 0.0E00R
W (L1) 1.9083E-10 0.0E00R
W (L2) 3.0462E-10 0.0E00R
W (L3) 1.28E-08 0.0E00R
Z (L1) 1.28E-08 0.0E00R
Z (L2) 3.2171E-08 0.0E00R
Z (L3)Primary risk totals
R
1_T 8.5252E-06 Risk of loss of human life in the structureR
2_T 8.8749E-07 Risk of loss of service to the public in the structureR
3_T 1.0283E-08 Risk of loss of cultural heritage in the structureR
4_T 4.8979E-06 Risk of loss of economic value in the structurePrimary risk with respect to source of damage
R
1_D 1.6009E-06 Risk of loss of human life in the structure due to flashes to the structure (S1)R
2_D 1.9504E-07 Risk of loss of service to the public in the structure due to flashes to the structure (S1)R
3_D 1.028E-08 Risk of loss of cultural heritage in the structure due to flashes to the structure (S1)R
4_D 4.2041E-06 Risk of loss of economic value in the structure due to flashes to the structure (S1)R
1_I Risk of loss of human life in the structure due to flashes influencing, but notstriking the structure (S2, S3, S4) 6.9244E-06
R
2_I Risk of loss of service to the public in the structure due to flashes influencing, but notstriking the structure (S2, S3, S4) 6.9245E-07
R
3_I Risk of loss of cultural heritage in the structure due to flashes influencing, but notstriking the structure (S2, S3, S4) 3.4314E-12
R
4_I Risk of loss of economic value in the structure due to flashes influencing, but notstriking the structure (S2, S3, S4) 6.9379E-07
StrikeRisk Version 5.0 Run identification 2/13/2014 6:31:54PM Page 10 of 11
File: Administration Substation.src
Primary risk with respect to type of damage
R
1_S 0.E00 Risk of loss of human life in the structure due to injury to living beings (D1)R
2_S 0.E00 Risk of loss of service to the public in the structure due to injury to living beings (D1)R
3_S 0.E00 Risk of loss of cultural heritage in the structure due to injury to living beings (D1)R
4_S 0.E00 Risk of loss of economic value in the structure due to injury to living beings (D1)R
1_F 6.7868E-07 Risk of loss of human life in the structure due to physical damage (D2)R
2_F 1.0283E-07 Risk of loss of service to the public in the structure due to physical damage (D2)R
3_F 6.7868E-07 Risk of loss of cultural heritage in the structure due to physical damage (D2)R
4_F 4.1132E-06 Risk of loss of economic value in the structure due to physical damage (D2)R
1_O 7.8466E-06 Risk of loss of human life in the structure due to failure of internal systems (D3)R
2_O 7.8466E-07 Risk of loss of service to the public in the structure due to failure of internal systems (D3)R
3_O 0.E00 Risk of loss of cultural heritage in the structure due to failure of internal systems (D3)R
4_O 7.8466E-07 Risk of loss of economic value in the structure due to failure of internal systems (D3)StrikeRisk Version 5.0 Run identification 2/13/2014 6:31:54PM Page 11 of 11
File: Mosque.src
Project details
BS EN 62305-2:2006 Risk Management Calculations
CONTAINER TERMINAL - 1(D&B) Project name: MOSQUE Project title: Project address: Project ref: Calculation ref: Calculation notes: Project author: 15 February 2014 Created: 15 February 2014 Modified:
Case details
Mosque Case name: Mosque Case title: 08 February 2014 Created: 15 February 2014 Modified: Case notes:Primary risk totals
R
1_T 1.9645E-07 Risk of loss of human life in the structureThe tolerable risk is not exceeded, no additional protection required
R
2_T 1.298E-05 Risk of loss of service to the public in the structureThe tolerable risk is not exceeded, no additional protection required
R
3_T 6.1391E-09 Risk of loss of cultural heritage in the structureThe tolerable risk is not exceeded, no additional protection required
R
4_T 1.5313E-06 Risk of loss of economic value in the structureStrikeRisk Version 5.0 Run identification 2/15/2014 1:46:55PM Page 1 of 10
NPP0026-TCC-CAL-EL-00001 REV. A Page 39 of 97
File: Mosque.src
Protection system design parameters
LPL IVLPS Protect the structure with a Class LPL IV Lightning Protection System in accordance with BS EN 62305-3
Imax 100.00kA Maximum peak current
97.00% Probability that lightning current parameters are smaller than the maximum value defined above
Imin 16.00kA Minimum peak current
84.00% Probability that lightning current parameters are greater than the minimum value defined above
60.00m Radius of rolling sphere
ISPD 25.00kA Maximum peak current of equipotential bonding SPD's for each of 'n' lines defined (based upon simple current division concept)
NOTE: The worst case surge that could be expected on a two-wire telephone or data line is 2.5kA (10/350 µs) per line (Category D test to BS EN 61643-21) to earth or 5 kA (10/350 µs) per pair.
Line 1 Protect Line 1 at its entrance to the structure with a standard equipotential bonding SPD (rated to ISPD above) in accordance with
BS EN 62305-3
NOTE: Where SPDs are required but an LPS is not (ISPD = 0), protect overhead lines with Type 1 SPDs (mains 12.5kA 10/350µs, data/telecom 2.5kA 10/350µs), protect underground lines with overvoltage or Type 2 SPDs (tested with an 8/20 µs waveform)
Line 2 Protect Line 2 at its entrance to the structure with a standard equipotential bonding SPD (rated to ISPD above) in accordance with
BS EN 62305-3
NOTE: Where SPDs are required but an LPS is not (ISPD = 0), protect overhead lines with Type 1 SPDs (mains 12.5kA 10/350µs, data/telecom 2.5kA 10/350µs), protect underground lines with overvoltage or Type 2 SPDs (tested with an 8/20 µs waveform)
Environment
N
g 1.00 Lightning flash density (Flashes/km²/year)C
d 0.25 Location factorC
e 0.00 Environmental factorRho 3.00 W m Soil resistivity (Ohm metres)
StrikeRisk Version 5.0 Run identification 2/15/2014 1:46:55PM Page 2 of 10
File: Mosque.src
Assessment of A
x- Collection areas (BS EN 62305-2 Annex A.2)
A
d/b 4,897.27 m² Collection area of primary structureA
d/a (2) 14,144.74 m² Collection area of structure 2 (adjacent)A
m 215,191.79 m² Collection area of surrounding groundA
l (L1) 55.29 m² Collection area of flashes striking line 1A
l (L2) 37.97 m² Collection area of flashes striking line 2A
l 93.25 m² Total collection area of flashes striking linesA
i (L1) 2,598.08 m² Collection area of flashes near line 1A
i (L2) 2,165.06 m² Collection area of flashes near line 2A
i 4,763.14 m² Total collection area of flashes near linesStructures
Primary structure
Structure ID: Mosque - Rectangular with a flat roof
L
b 18.50 m Length of primary structureW
b 18.50 m Width of primary structureH
b 9.36 m Height of primary structureSecondary structures
Structure No Minaret - Cylindrical
C
da 0.25 Location factor for structure 2 (adjacent)Diameter of secondary structure 2.20 m
D
aHeight of secondary structure 22.00 m
H
aStrikeRisk Version 5.0 Run identification 2/15/2014 1:46:55PM Page 3 of 10
File: Mosque.src
Lines
Line 1 Main LV Incomer
K
S3 (L1) 0.00 Factor relevant to the characteristics of internal wiring for line 1P
SPD (L1) Probability of failure of internal systems or a service when SPDs areprovided for equipotential bonding (in accordance with BS EN 62305-3) for line 1
0.03
P
SPDc (L1) Probability of failure of internal systems or a service when coordinated SPDsare provided (in accordance with BS EN 62305-4) for line 1 1.00
C
t (L1) 1.00 Correction factor for a hv/lv transformer on line 1C
dc (L1) 0.25 Location factor for line 1U
w (L1) 1.50 kV Rated impulse withstand voltage of a system connected to line 1L
c (L1) 60.00 m Length of line 1H
c (L1) 0.00 m Height of the conductors above ground for line 1Line 2 UPS DB Incomer
K
S3 (L2) 0.00 Factor relevant to the characteristics of internal wiring for line 2P
SPD (L2) Probability of failure of internal systems or a service when SPDs areprovided for equipotential bonding (in accordance with BS EN 62305-3) for line 2
0.03
P
SPDc (L2) Probability of failure of internal systems or a service when coordinated SPDsare provided (in accordance with BS EN 62305-4) for line 2 1.00
C
t (L2) 1.00 Correction factor for a hv/lv transformer on line 2C
dc (L2) 0.25 Location factor for line 2U
w (L2) 1.50 kV Rated impulse withstand voltage of a system connected to line 2L
c (L2) 50.00 m Length of line 2H
c (L2) 0.00 m Height of the conductors above ground for line 2StrikeRisk Version 5.0 Run identification 2/15/2014 1:46:55PM Page 4 of 10