Introduction and
Introduction and
Methodology
About ISACA
About ISACA
Nearing its 50th year
Nearing its 50th year, ISACA, ISACA®®(isaca.org) is a global association helping individuals and (isaca.org) is a global association helping individuals and enterprises achieve theenterprises achieve the
positive potentia
positive potential of technologyl of technology. T. Technology powers toechnology powers today’day’s world and ISACA s world and ISACA equips professionals wiequips professionals with theth the knowledge, credentials, education and community to advance their careers and transform their
knowledge, credentials, education and community to advance their careers and transform their organizatorganizations. ISACAions. ISACA leverages the expertise of its
leverages the expertise of its half-million engaged professionahalf-million engaged professionals in ls in information and cyber securityinformation and cyber security, governance,, governance, assurance, risk and innovation, as
assurance, risk and innovation, as well as its well as its enterprise performance subsidiaryenterprise performance subsidiary, CMMI, CMMI®®Institute, to help advanceInstitute, to help advance
innovation through technology
innovation through technology. ISACA has a . ISACA has a presence in more than 188 presence in more than 188 countries, including more than 217 countries, including more than 217 chapterschapters and offices in both the United States and China.
and offices in both the United States and China.
Disclaimer
Disclaimer
ISACA has designed and created
ISACA has designed and createdCOBIT COBIT ®®2019 Framework: Introduction and Methodology2019 Framework: Introduction and Methodology (the “Work”) primarily(the “Work”) primarily
as an
as an educational resource for enterprise governance of information and technology (EGIT), assurance, risk educational resource for enterprise governance of information and technology (EGIT), assurance, risk andand security professionals. ISACA makes no claim that use of any of the Work will assure a successful outcome. The security professionals. ISACA makes no claim that use of any of the Work will assure a successful outcome. The W
Work should not ork should not be considered inclusive of all be considered inclusive of all proper information, procedures and tests or proper information, procedures and tests or exclusive of other exclusive of other information, procedures and tests that are
information, procedures and tests that are reasonably directed to obtaining the same results. reasonably directed to obtaining the same results. In determining theIn determining the propriety of any speci
propriety of any specific informationfic information, procedure or test, enter, procedure or test, enterprise governance of iprise governance of information and tenformation and technologychnology (EGIT), assurance, risk and security professionals should apply their own professional judgment to the specific (EGIT), assurance, risk and security professionals should apply their own professional judgment to the specific circumstances presented by the
circumstances presented by the particular systems or particular systems or information technology environment.information technology environment.
Copyright
Copyright
© 2018 ISACA. All rights reserved. For usage guidelines, see
© 2018 ISACA. All rights reserved. For usage guidelines, seewww.isaca.org/COBITusewww.isaca.org/COBITuse..
ISACA
ISACA
1700 E. Golf Road, Suite 400 1700 E. Golf Road, Suite 400 Schaumburg, IL 60173, USA Schaumburg, IL 60173, USA Phone: +1.847.660.5505 Phone: +1.847.660.5505 Fax: +1.847.253.1755 Fax: +1.847.253.1755 Contact us:
Contact us: https://support.isahttps://support.isaca.orgca.org Website: www.isaca.org
Website: www.isaca.org
Participate in the ISACA Online Forums:
Participate in the ISACA Online Forums: https://engage.isaca.org/onlineforumshttps://engage.isaca.org/onlineforums Twitter:
Twitter:http://twitter.com/ISACANewshttp://twitter.com/ISACANews LinkedIn:
LinkedIn:http://linkd.in/ISACAOfficialhttp://linkd.in/ISACAOfficial Facebook:
Facebook:www.facebook.com/ISACAHQwww.facebook.com/ISACAHQ Instagram:
Instagram:www.instagram.com/isacanews/www.instagram.com/isacanews/
COBIT
COBIT ®®2019 Framework: Introduction and 2019 Framework: Introduction and MethodologyMethodology
ISBN
In Memoriam: John Lainhart (1946-2018)
In Memoriam: John Lainhart (1946-2018)
Dedicated to John Lainhart, ISACA Board chair 1984-1985. John was instrumental in the creation of the COBIT
Dedicated to John Lainhart, ISACA Board chair 1984-1985. John was instrumental in the creation of the COBIT®® framework and most recently served as chair of the working group for
framework and most recently served as chair of the working group for COBITCOBIT®®2019, which culminated in the2019, which culminated in the creation of this work. Over his
creation of this work. Over his four decades with ISACA, John was four decades with ISACA, John was involved in numerous aspects of the associationinvolved in numerous aspects of the association
as well as holding ISACA’s CISA, CRISC, CISM and CGEIT certifications. John leaves behind a remarkable
as well as holding ISACA’s CISA, CRISC, CISM and CGEIT certifications. John leaves behind a remarkable
personal and professi
Page intentionally left blank
Acknowledgments
Acknowledgments
ISACA wishes to recognize:
ISACA wishes to recognize:
COBIT Working Group
COBIT Working Group
(2017-
(2017-
2018)
2018)
John Lainhart, Chair, CISA, CRISC,
John Lainhart, Chair, CISA, CRISC, CISM, CGEIT, CIPP/G, CIPP/US, Grant Thornton, USACISM, CGEIT, CIPP/G, CIPP/US, Grant Thornton, USA
Matt Conboy, Cigna, USA
Matt Conboy, Cigna, USA
Ron Saull, CGEIT, CSP, Great-West Lifeco & IGM Financial (retired), Canada
Ron Saull, CGEIT, CSP, Great-West Lifeco & IGM Financial (retired), Canada
Development
Development
T
T
eam
eam
Steven De Haes, Ph.
Steven De Haes, Ph.D., Antwerp Management School, University of Antwerp, BelgiumD., Antwerp Management School, University of Antwerp, Belgium
Matthias Goorden, PwC, Belgium
Matthias Goorden, PwC, Belgium
Stefanie Grijp, PwC, Belgium
Stefanie Grijp, PwC, Belgium
Bart Peeters, PwC, Belgium
Bart Peeters, PwC, Belgium
Geert Poels, Ph.D.,
Geert Poels, Ph.D., Ghent UniversityGhent University, Belgium, Belgium
Dirk Steuperaert, CISA, CRISC, CGEIT, IT In Balance, Belgium
Dirk Steuperaert, CISA, CRISC, CGEIT, IT In Balance, Belgium
Expert Reviewers
Expert Reviewers
Sarah Ahmad Abedin, CISA, CRISC, CGEIT, Grant Thornton LLP, USA
Sarah Ahmad Abedin, CISA, CRISC, CGEIT, Grant Thornton LLP, USA
Floris Ampe, CISA, CRISC, CGEIT, CIA, ISO27000, PRINCE2, TOGAF, PwC, Belgium
Floris Ampe, CISA, CRISC, CGEIT, CIA, ISO27000, PRINCE2, TOGAF, PwC, Belgium
Elisabeth Anto
Elisabeth Antonssen, Nordea nssen, Nordea Bank, SwedenBank, Sweden
Krzystof Baczkiewicz, CHAMP, CITAM, CSAM, Transpectit, Poland
Krzystof Baczkiewicz, CHAMP, CITAM, CSAM, Transpectit, Poland
Christopher M. Ballister, CRISC, CISM, CGEIT, Grant Thornton, USA
Christopher M. Ballister, CRISC, CISM, CGEIT, Grant Thornton, USA
Gary Bannister, CGEIT
Gary Bannister, CGEIT, CGMA, , CGMA, FCMA, AustriaFCMA, Austria
Graciela Braga, CGEIT, Auditor and Advisor, Argentina
Graciela Braga, CGEIT, Auditor and Advisor, Argentina
Ricardo Bria, CISA, CRISC, CGEIT, COTO CICSA, Argentina
Ricardo Bria, CISA, CRISC, CGEIT, COTO CICSA, Argentina
Sushil Chatterji, CGEIT, Edutech Enterprises,
Sushil Chatterji, CGEIT, Edutech Enterprises, SingaporeSingapore
Peter T. Davis, CISA, CISM, CGEIT, COBIT 5 Assessor, CISSP, CMA, CPA, PMI-RMP, PMP,
Peter T. Davis, CISA, CISM, CGEIT, COBIT 5 Assessor, CISSP, CMA, CPA, PMI-RMP, PMP,
Peter Davis+Associates, Canada
Peter Davis+Associates, Canada
James Doss, CISM,
James Doss, CISM, CGEITCGEIT, EMCCA, , EMCCA, PMPPMP, SSGB, , SSGB, TOGAF 9, ITvalueQuickStart.com, USATOGAF 9, ITvalueQuickStart.com, USA
Yalcin Gerek, CISA, CRISC, CGEIT, ITIL Expert, Prince2, ISO 20000LI, ISO27001LA, TAC AS., Turkey
Yalcin Gerek, CISA, CRISC, CGEIT, ITIL Expert, Prince2, ISO 20000LI, ISO27001LA, TAC AS., Turkey
James L. Golden, Golden
James L. Golden, Golden Consulting AssocConsulting Associates, USAiates, USA
J. Winston Hayden, CISA, CISM,
J. Winston Hayden, CISA, CISM, CRISC, CGEITCRISC, CGEIT, South Africa, South Africa
Jimmy Heschl, CISA, CISM,
Jimmy Heschl, CISA, CISM, CGEITCGEIT, Red , Red Bull, AustriaBull, Austria
Jorge Hidalgo, CISA, CISM,
Jorge Hidalgo, CISA, CISM, CGEITCGEIT, Chile, Chile
John Jasinski, CISA, CRISC, CISM, CGEIT, COBIT 5 Assessor, CSM, CSPO, IT4IT-F, ITIL Expert, Lean IT-F,
John Jasinski, CISA, CRISC, CISM, CGEIT, COBIT 5 Assessor, CSM, CSPO, IT4IT-F, ITIL Expert, Lean IT-F,
MOF,
MOF, SSBB, TOGAF-F, SSBB, TOGAF-F, USAUSA
Joanna Karczewska, CISA, Poland
Joanna Karczewska, CISA, Poland
Glenn Keaveny, CEH, CISSP, Grant Thornton, USA
Glenn Keaveny, CEH, CISSP, Grant Thornton, USA
Eddy Khoo S.
Eddy Khoo S. K., CGEIT, Kuala Lumpur, MalaysiaK., CGEIT, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
Joao Souza Neto, CRISC,
Joao Souza Neto, CRISC, CGEITCGEIT, Universidade Católica de Brasília, Brazil, Universidade Católica de Brasília, Brazil
Trace
Tracey O’Brien, CISA, y O’Brien, CISA, CISM, CGEIT, IBM Corp (retired), USACISM, CGEIT, IBM Corp (retired), USA
Zachy Olorunojowon, CISA, CGEIT, PMP, BC Ministry of Health, Victoria, BC Canada
Zachy Olorunojowon, CISA, CGEIT, PMP, BC Ministry of Health, Victoria, BC Canada
Opeyemi Onifade, CISA, CISM, CGEIT, BRMP, CISSP, ISO 27001LA, M.IoD, Afenoid Enterprise Limited, Nigeria
Opeyemi Onifade, CISA, CISM, CGEIT, BRMP, CISSP, ISO 27001LA, M.IoD, Afenoid Enterprise Limited, Nigeria
Andre Pitkowski, CRISC, CGEIT, CRMA-IIA, OCTAVE, SM, APIT Consultoria de Informatica Ltd., Brazil
Andre Pitkowski, CRISC, CGEIT, CRMA-IIA, OCTAVE, SM, APIT Consultoria de Informatica Ltd., Brazil
Dirk Reimers, Entco Deutschland GmbH, A Micro Focus Company
Dirk Reimers, Entco Deutschland GmbH, A Micro Focus Company
Steve Reznik, CISA, CRISC, ADP, LLC., USA
Steve Reznik, CISA, CRISC, ADP, LLC., USA
Bruno Horta Soares, CISA, CRISC, CGEIT, PMP, GOVaaS - Governance Advisors, as-a-Service, Portugal
Bruno Horta Soares, CISA, CRISC, CGEIT, PMP, GOVaaS - Governance Advisors, as-a-Service, Portugal
Dr. Katalin Szenes, Ph.D., CISA,
Dr. Katalin Szenes, Ph.D., CISA, CISM, CGEIT, CISSPCISM, CGEIT, CISSP, John , John von Neumann Faculty of von Neumann Faculty of Informatics,Informatics,
Obuda University, Hungary
Acknowledgments
Acknowledgments
(cont.)
(cont.)
ISACA Board of Directors
ISACA Board of Directors
Rob Clyde, CISM, Clyde Consulting LLC, USA,
Rob Clyde, CISM, Clyde Consulting LLC, USA, Chair Chair
Brennan Baybeck, CISA,
Brennan Baybeck, CISA, CRISC, CISM, CRISC, CISM, CISSPCISSP, Oracle , Oracle Corporation, USA, Vice-Chair Corporation, USA, Vice-Chair
Trace
Tracey Dedrick, Former Chief y Dedrick, Former Chief Risk Officer with Hudson Risk Officer with Hudson City Bancorp, USACity Bancorp, USA
Leonard Ong, CISA, CRISC, CISM, CGEIT, COBIT 5 Implementer and Assessor, CFE, CIPM, CIPT, CISSP,
Leonard Ong, CISA, CRISC, CISM, CGEIT, COBIT 5 Implementer and Assessor, CFE, CIPM, CIPT, CISSP,
CITBCM, CPP, CSSLP, GCFA, GCIA, GCIH, GSNA, ISSMP-ISSAP, PMP, Merck & Co., Inc., Singapore
CITBCM, CPP, CSSLP, GCFA, GCIA, GCIH, GSNA, ISSMP-ISSAP, PMP, Merck & Co., Inc., Singapore
R.V. Raghu, CISA, CRISC, Versatilist Consulting India Pvt. Ltd., India
R.V. Raghu, CISA, CRISC, Versatilist Consulting India Pvt. Ltd., India
Gabriela Reynaga, CISA, CRISC, COBIT 5
Gabriela Reynaga, CISA, CRISC, COBIT 5 Foundation, GRCPFoundation, GRCP, Holistics GRC, , Holistics GRC, MexicoMexico
Gregory Touhill, CISM, CISSP, Cyxtera Federal Group, USA
Gregory Touhill, CISM, CISSP, Cyxtera Federal Group, USA
Ted Wolff, CISA, Vanguard, Inc., USA
Ted Wolff, CISA, Vanguard, Inc., USA
Ticha
Tichaona Zororo, CISA, ona Zororo, CISA, CRISC, CISM, CGEIT, COBIT 5 Assessor, CIA, CRMA, EGIT | CRISC, CISM, CGEIT, COBIT 5 Assessor, CIA, CRMA, EGIT | Enterprise GovernanceEnterprise Governance
of IT, South Africa
of IT, South Africa
Theresa Grafenstine, CISA, CRISC, CGEIT, CGAP, CGMA, CIA, CISSP, CPA, Deloitte & Touche LLP, USA,
Theresa Grafenstine, CISA, CRISC, CGEIT, CGAP, CGMA, CIA, CISSP, CPA, Deloitte & Touche LLP, USA,
ISACA Board Chair, 2017-2018
ISACA Board Chair, 2017-2018
Chris K. Dimitriadis, Ph.D.,
Chris K. Dimitriadis, Ph.D., CISA, CRISC, CISA, CRISC, CISM, INTRALOTCISM, INTRALOT, Greece, ISACA Board Chair, 2015-2017, Greece, ISACA Board Chair, 2015-2017
Matt Loeb, CGEIT, CAE, FASAE, Chief Executive Officer, ISACA, USA
Matt Loeb, CGEIT, CAE, FASAE, Chief Executive Officer, ISACA, USA
Robert E Stroud (1965-2018), CRISC,
Robert E Stroud (1965-2018), CRISC, CGEITCGEIT, XebiaLabs, Inc., , XebiaLabs, Inc., USA, ISACA Board Chair, 2014-2015USA, ISACA Board Chair, 2014-2015
ISACA is deepl
ISACA is deeply saddened by the passing oy saddened by the passing of Robert E Strf Robert E Stroud in September 2018.oud in September 2018.
Expert Reviewers
Expert Reviewers
Peter Tessin, CISA, CRISC, CISM, CGEIT, Discover, USA
Peter Tessin, CISA, CRISC, CISM, CGEIT, Discover, USA
Mark Thomas, CRISC, CGEIT, Escoute, USA
Mark Thomas, CRISC, CGEIT, Escoute, USA
John Thorp, CMC, ISP, ITCP, The Thorp Network, Canada
John Thorp, CMC, ISP, ITCP, The Thorp Network, Canada
Greet Volders, CGEIT, COBIT Assessor, Voquals N.V., Belgium
Greet Volders, CGEIT, COBIT Assessor, Voquals N.V., Belgium
Markus Walter, CISA, CISM, CISSP, ITIL, PMP, TOGAF, PwC Singapore/Switzerland
Markus Walter, CISA, CISM, CISSP, ITIL, PMP, TOGAF, PwC Singapore/Switzerland
David M. Williams, CISA, CAMS, Westpac, New Zealand
David M. Williams, CISA, CAMS, Westpac, New Zealand
Greg Wit
TABLE OF CONTENTS
TABLE OF CONTENTS
List of Figures
List of Figures
...9...9Chapter 1. Introduction
Chapter 1. Introduction
...11...11 1.11.1 Enterprise GovernanEnterprise Governance of Information and Technce of Information and Technology ...1ology ...111 1.2
1.2 Benefits of Information and TeBenefits of Information and Technology Governachnology Governance ...1nce ...111 1.3
1.3 COBIT as aCOBIT as an I&T Gon I&T Governance vernance Framework...12Framework...12 1.3.1
1.3.1 What Is COBIT What Is COBIT and What Is It and What Is It Not?Not? ...13 ...13 1.4
1.4 Structure Structure of of This This Publication....Publication...14...14
Chapter 2. Intended Audience
Chapter 2. Intended Audience
...15...152.1
2.1 Governance Governance Stakeholders Stakeholders ...15...15
Chapter 3. COBIT Principles
Chapter 3. COBIT Principles
...17...173.1
3.1 Introduction Introduction ...17...17 3.2
3.2 Six Principles Six Principles for a Govfor a Governance Sysernance System...17tem...17 3.3
3.3 Three Principles Three Principles for a Governafor a Governance Framework...18nce Framework...18 3.4 COBIT
3.4 COBIT®®2019...182019...18
Chapter 4. Basic Concepts: Governance System and Components
Chapter 4. Basic Concepts: Governance System and Components
...19...194.1
4.1 COBIT OveCOBIT Overview rview ...19...19 4.2
4.2 Governance Governance and Manaand Management Ogement Objectives...bjectives...20...20 4.3
4.3 Components of the GoComponents of the Governance System vernance System ...21...21 4.4
4.4 Focus Focus Areas Areas ...22...22 4.5
4.5 Design FacDesign Factors tors ...23...23 4.6
4.6 Goals Goals Cascade...28Cascade...28 4.6.1 Enterprise Goals
4.6.1 Enterprise Goals ...29 ...29 4.6.2
4.6.2 Alignment Alignment GoalsGoals ...30 ...30
Chapter 5. COBIT Governance and Management Objectives
Chapter 5. COBIT Governance and Management Objectives
...33...335.1 Purpose...33 5.1 Purpose...33
Chapter 6. Performance Management in COBIT
Chapter 6. Performance Management in COBIT
...37...376.1
6.1 Definition Definition ...37...37 6.2
6.2 COBIT PerformancCOBIT Performance Management Principe Management Principles les ...37...37 6.3
6.3 COBIT PerformCOBIT Performance Managance Management Overement Overview...37view...37 6.4
6.4 Managing Managing Performance Performance of Procof Processes...esses...38...38 6.4.1
6.4.1 Process Process Capability Capability LevelsLevels...38...38 6.4.2
6.4.2 Rating Rating Process Process ActivitiesActivities ...39 ...39 6.4.3
6.4.3 Focus Focus Area Maturity Area Maturity LevelsLevels ...39 ...39 6.5
6.5 Managing PerformanManaging Performance of Other Governance System Componce of Other Governance System Components ents ...40...40 6.5.1
6.5.1 Performance Management Performance Management of of Organizational StructuresOrganizational Structures...40...40 6.5.2
6.5.2 Performance Management Performance Management of of InformatioInformation n ItemsItems...41...41 6.5.3
6.5.3 Performance Management of Performance Management of Culture and Culture and Behavior Behavior ...43...43
Chapter 7. Desig
Chapter 7. Desig
ning a
ning a
T
T
ailored Governance System
ailored Governance System
...45...457.1
7.1 Impact Impact of Desigof Design Facton Factors...45rs...45 7.2
7.2 Stages and Stages and Steps in thSteps in the Design Proe Design Process...47cess...47
Chapter 8. Implementing Enterprise Governance of IT
Chapter 8. Implementing Enterprise Governance of IT
...49...498.1
8.1 COBIT ICOBIT Implementation mplementation Guide PuGuide Purposerpose...49...49 8.2
8.2.1
8.2.1 Phase 1—What Phase 1—What Are the Are the Drivers?Drivers? ...50...50 8.2.2
8.2.2 Phase 2—Where Phase 2—Where Are WAre We Now?e Now?...50...50 8.2.3
8.2.3 Phase 3—Where Do We Phase 3—Where Do We Want Want to Be?to Be?...51...51 8.2.4
8.2.4 Phase 4—What Needs Phase 4—What Needs to Be to Be Done?Done?...51...51 8.2.5
8.2.5 Phase 5—How Do Phase 5—How Do We We Get There?Get There?...51...51 8.2.6
8.2.6 Phase 6—Did WPhase 6—Did We Get e Get There?There?...51...51 8.2.7
8.2.7 Phase 7—How Do Phase 7—How Do We We Keep the Momentum Keep the Momentum Going?Going?...51...51 8.3
8.3 Relationship Relationship BetweenBetweenCOBIT COBIT ®® 2019 Design Guide2019 Design Guide andand COBIT COBIT ®® 2019 Implementation Guide2019 Implementation Guide ...52...52
Chapter 9. Getting Started With COBIT: Making the Case
Chapter 9. Getting Started With COBIT: Making the Case
...53...539.1 Business
9.1 Business CaseCase...53...53 9.2 Executive
9.2 Executive SummarySummary...53...53 9.3 Background...54 9.3 Background...54 9.4
9.4 Business Business Challenges...55Challenges...55 9.4.1
9.4.1 Gap Gap Analysis aAnalysis and Goalnd Goal...55...55 9.4.2 Alternatives Considered
9.4.2 Alternatives Considered...56...56 9.5
9.5 Proposed Proposed SolutionSolution...56...56 9.5.1
9.5.1 Phase Phase 1. 1. Pre-planningPre-planning...56...56 9.5.2
9.5.2 Phase Phase 2. 2. Program ImplementationProgram Implementation...57...57 9.5.3 Program Scope
9.5.3 Program Scope...57...57 9.5.4
9.5.4 Program MetProgram Methodology and hodology and AlignmentAlignment...57...57 9.5.5 Program Deliverables 9.5.5 Program Deliverables...58...58 9.5.6 Program Risk 9.5.6 Program Risk ...58...58 9.5.7 Stakeholders 9.5.7 Stakeholders...59...59 9.5.8
9.5.8 Cost-Benefit Cost-Benefit AnalysisAnalysis...59...59 9.5.9
9.5.9 Challenges and Challenges and Success Success FactorsFactors...60...60
Chapter 10. COBIT and Other Standards
Chapter 10. COBIT and Other Standards
...63...6310.1
10.1 Guiding Guiding PrinciplePrinciple...63...63 10.2
LIST OF FIGURES
LIST OF FIGURES
Chapter 1. Introduction
Chapter 1. Introduction
Figure 1.1—The Context
Figure 1.1—The Context of Enterprise Governance of of Enterprise Governance of Information and TechnInformation and Technology...11ology...11
Chapter 2. Intended Audience
Chapter 2. Intended Audience
Figure 2.1—COBIT Stakeholders...15Figure 2.1—COBIT Stakeholders...15
Chapter 3. COBIT Principles
Chapter 3. COBIT Principles
Figure 3.1—Governa Figure 3.1—Governance System Principlesnce System Principles...17...17Figure 3.2—Governance Framework Principles...18
Figure 3.2—Governance Framework Principles...18
Chapter 4. Basic Concepts: Governance System and Components
Chapter 4. Basic Concepts: Governance System and Components
Figure Figure 4.1—COBIT 4.1—COBIT OverviewOverview...19...19Figure 4.2—COBI Figure 4.2—COBIT Core ModelT Core Model...21...21
Figure 4.3—COBIT Comp Figure 4.3—COBIT Components of a Governaonents of a Governance Systemnce System...22...22
Figure 4.4—C Figure 4.4—COBIT DesigOBIT Design Factorsn Factors...23...23
Figure 4.5—Enterprise Strategy Design Factor...23
Figure 4.5—Enterprise Strategy Design Factor...23
Figure 4.6—Enterprise Goals Design Factor...24
Figure 4.6—Enterprise Goals Design Factor...24
Figure 4.7—Risk Profile Design Factors (IT Risk Categories Figure 4.7—Risk Profile Design Factors (IT Risk Categories))...24...24
Figure 4.8—I&T Figure 4.8—I&T-Related Issues Design -Related Issues Design Factor...25Factor...25
Figure 4.9—Threat Landsca Figure 4.9—Threat Landscape Design Factorpe Design Factor...25...25
Figure 4.10—Complian Figure 4.10—Compliance Requirements Design Factorce Requirements Design Factor...26...26
Figure 4.1 Figure 4.11—Role of IT De1—Role of IT Design Factorsign Factor...26...26
Figure 4.12—Sourcing Mode Figure 4.12—Sourcing Model for IT Design Factorl for IT Design Factor...26...26
Figure 4.13—IT Implementation Methods Design Factor...27
Figure 4.13—IT Implementation Methods Design Factor...27
Figure 4.14—Tech Figure 4.14—Technology Adoptionology Adoption Strategy n Strategy Design FactorDesign Factor...27...27
Figure 4.15—Enterprise Size Design Facto Figure 4.15—Enterprise Size Design Factorr...27...27
Figure 4.16—COBIT Go Figure 4.16—COBIT Goals Cascadeals Cascade...28...28
Figure 4.17—Goals Cascade: Enterprise Goals and Metrics...29
Figure 4.17—Goals Cascade: Enterprise Goals and Metrics...29
Figure 4.18—Goals Cas Figure 4.18—Goals Cascade: Alicade: Alignment Goals and Metricgnment Goals and Metricss ...30...30
Chapter 5. COBIT Governance and Management Objectives
Chapter 5. COBIT Governance and Management Objectives
Figure 5.1—COBIT Core Model: Governance and Management Objectives and Figure 5.1—COBIT Core Model: Governance and Management Objectives and Purpose...33Purpose...33Chapter 6. Performance Management in COBIT
Chapter 6. Performance Management in COBIT
Figure 6.1 Figure 6.1—Capability —Capability LevelsLevels...38...38Figure 6.2—Capabili Figure 6.2—Capability Levels for Processesty Levels for Processes...39...39
Figure 6.3—Maturity Levels for Focus Figure 6.3—Maturity Levels for Focus AreasAreas...40...40
Figure 6.4—Informa Figure 6.4—Information Reference Modetion Reference Model: l: Quality Criteria for InformQuality Criteria for Information...42ation...42
Chapter 7. Designing a Tailored Governance System
Chapter 7. Designing a Tailored Governance System
Figure 7.1—Impact of Design Factors on a Governance and Management System...45Figure 7.1—Impact of Design Factors on a Governance and Management System...45
Figure 7.2—Governa Figure 7.2—Governance System Design Wnce System Design Workfloworkflow...47...47
Chapter 8. Implementing Enterprise Governance of IT
Chapter 8. Implementing Enterprise Governance of IT
Figure 8.1—COBIT Implementa Figure 8.1—COBIT Implementation Road Maption Road Map...50...50Figure 8.2—Connection Points Between Figure 8.2—Connection Points Between COBIT Design GuideCOBIT Design Guide andand COBIT Implementation GuideCOBIT Implementation Guide...52...52
Chapter 9. Getting Started With COBIT: Making the Case
Chapter 9. Getting Started With COBIT: Making the Case
Figure 9.1—Challenge Figure 9.1—Challenges and Planned Actions for Acme Corporatios and Planned Actions for Acme Corporationn...60...60Page intentionally left blank
INTRODUCTION
INTRODUCTION
Chapter 1
Chapter 1
Introduction
Introduction
1.1
1.1
Enterprise
Enterprise
Governance
Governance
of
of
Information
Information
and
and
T
T
echnolo
echnolo
gy
gy
In the light
In the light of digital transformation, information and technology (I&T) have become crucial in the of digital transformation, information and technology (I&T) have become crucial in the support,support,
sustainability and growth of enterprises. Previously, governing boards (boards of
sustainability and growth of enterprises. Previously, governing boards (boards of directors) and senior managementdirectors) and senior management
could delegate, ignore or avoid
could delegate, ignore or avoid I&TI&T-related decisions. In most sectors -related decisions. In most sectors and industries, such attitudes are and industries, such attitudes are now ill-now
ill-advised. Stakeholder value creation (i.e., realizing benefits at an
advised. Stakeholder value creation (i.e., realizing benefits at an optimal resource cost while optimizing risk) is optimal resource cost while optimizing risk) is oftenoften
driven by a
driven by a high degree of digitization in high degree of digitization in new business models, efficient processes, successful innovation, etc.new business models, efficient processes, successful innovation, etc.
Digitized enterprises are increasingly dependent on I&T for survival and
Digitized enterprises are increasingly dependent on I&T for survival and growth.growth.
Given the centrality of I&T for
Given the centrality of I&T for enterprise risk management and value generation, a specific focus enterprise risk management and value generation, a specific focus on enterpriseon enterprise
governance of information and technolog
governance of information and technology (EGIT) has arisen over the y (EGIT) has arisen over the last three decades. EGIT is an integral part of last three decades. EGIT is an integral part of
corporate governance. It is exercised by
corporate governance. It is exercised by the board that oversees the board that oversees the definition and implementation of processes,the definition and implementation of processes,
structures and relational mechanisms in the organization that enable both business
structures and relational mechanisms in the organization that enable both business and IT people to and IT people to execute their execute their
responsibilitie
responsibilities in s in support of business/IT alignment and the support of business/IT alignment and the creation of business value from creation of business value from I&TI&T-enabled business-enabled business
investments (
investments (figure 1.1figure 1.1).).
Enterprise governance of information and technology is complex and
Enterprise governance of information and technology is complex and multifacetmultifaceted. There is no ed. There is no silver bullet (or idealsilver bullet (or ideal
way) to design,
way) to design, implement and maintain effectivimplement and maintain effective EGIT within an e EGIT within an organizatorganization. As such, members of ion. As such, members of the governingthe governing
boards and senior ma
boards and senior management typicnagement typically need to tailally need to tailor their EGIT meor their EGIT measures and implemasures and implementation to theientation to their own specificr own specific
context and needs. They must
context and needs. They must also be willing to also be willing to accept more accountability for I&T and drive a accept more accountability for I&T and drive a different mindset anddifferent mindset and
culture for delivering value from I&T.
culture for delivering value from I&T.
1.2
1.2
Benefits
Benefits
of
of
Information
Information
and
and
T
T
echnology
echnology
Governance
Governance
Fundamentall
Fundamentally, EGIT is concerned with value delivery from digital transformation and the y, EGIT is concerned with value delivery from digital transformation and the mitigation of businessmitigation of business
risk that results from
risk that results from digital transformatiodigital transformation. More n. More specificallyspecifically, three main , three main outcomes can be expected after successfuloutcomes can be expected after successful
adoption of EGIT:
adoption of EGIT:
Benefits
Benefits realizatirealizationon —This consists of crea —This consists of creating value for the enting value for the enterprise through I&Tterprise through I&T, maintaining and i, maintaining and increasingncreasing
value derived from existing I&T
value derived from existing I&T11
1
1investments, and eliminating IT initiatives and assets that are not investments, and eliminating IT initiatives and assets that are not creatingcreating
sufficient value. The basic principle of I&T value are
sufficient value. The basic principle of I&T value are delivery of fit-for-purpose services and solutions, on delivery of fit-for-purpose services and solutions, on timetime
1
1 1
1 Throughout this text, IT is used tThroughout this text, IT is used to refer to the organizational department o refer to the organizational department with main responsibility for technology. I&T as used in this with main responsibility for technology. I&T as used in this text refers to altext refers to alll
the information the enterprise generates, processes and uses to achieve its goals, as well as the technology to support that throughout the enterprise.
the information the enterprise generates, processes and uses to achieve its goals, as well as the technology to support that throughout the enterprise.
Figure 1.1—The Context
Figure 1.1—The Context of Enterprise Governance of of Enterprise Governance of Information and TechnoInformation and Technologylogy
Enterprise
Enterprise
Governance of IT
Governance of IT
Business/IT
Business/IT
Alignment
Alignment
Creation
Creation
Value
Value
Source: De Haes, Steven; W. Van Grembergen;
Source: De Haes, Steven; W. Van Grembergen;Enterprise Governance of Information Technology: Achieving Alignment and ValueEnterprise Governance of Information Technology: Achieving Alignment and Value,,
Featuring COBIT 5
and within budget, that
and within budget, that generate the intended financial and nonfinancial benefits. The value that I&T deliversgenerate the intended financial and nonfinancial benefits. The value that I&T delivers
should be aligned directly with the values on which the business is
should be aligned directly with the values on which the business is focused. IT value should also be measured in afocused. IT value should also be measured in a
way that shows
way that shows the impact and contributions of IT-enablthe impact and contributions of IT-enabled investments in the ed investments in the value creation process of thevalue creation process of the
enterprise.
enterprise.
Risk optimization
Risk optimization —This entails add —This entails addressing the business risk assocressing the business risk associated with the use, owneiated with the use, ownership, operation,rship, operation,
involvement, influence and adoption of I&T within an enterprise. I&T-related business risk consists of I&T-related
involvement, influence and adoption of I&T within an enterprise. I&T-related business risk consists of I&T-related
events that could potentially impact the business. While value
events that could potentially impact the business. While value delivery focuses on thedelivery focuses on the creationcreationof value, risk of value, risk
management focuses on the
management focuses on the preservat preservationionof value. The management of I&T-related risk should be integrated withinof value. The management of I&T-related risk should be integrated within
the enterprise risk management approac
the enterprise risk management approach to ensure a h to ensure a focus on IT by the enterprise. It sfocus on IT by the enterprise. It should also be measured in ahould also be measured in a
way that shows
way that shows the impact and contributions of optimizing I&T-the impact and contributions of optimizing I&T-related business risk on related business risk on preserving value.preserving value.
Resource optimization
Resource optimization —This ensures that th —This ensures that the appropriate cae appropriate capabilities are in ppabilities are in place to execute lace to execute the strategic plathe strategic plann
and sufficient, appropriate and effective resources are provided. Resource optimization ensures that an integrated,
and sufficient, appropriate and effective resources are provided. Resource optimization ensures that an integrated,
economical IT infrastructur
economical IT infrastructure is e is provided, new technology is introduced as provided, new technology is introduced as required by the business, required by the business, and obsoleteand obsolete
systems are updated or replaced. Because it recognizes the importance of people, in addition to hardware and
systems are updated or replaced. Because it recognizes the importance of people, in addition to hardware and
software, it focuses on
software, it focuses on providing training, promoting retention and ensuring competence of key IT providing training, promoting retention and ensuring competence of key IT personnel. Anpersonnel. An
important resource is data and
important resource is data and information, and exploiting data and information to gain information, and exploiting data and information to gain optimal value is another optimal value is another
key element of
key element of resource optimization.resource optimization.
Strategic alignment and performance measureme
Strategic alignment and performance measurement are of nt are of paramount importance and apply overall to all paramount importance and apply overall to all activities toactivities to
ensure that I&T-related objectives are aligned with the enterprise goals.
ensure that I&T-related objectives are aligned with the enterprise goals.
In a large case study of an international airline company, EGIT’s benefits were demonstrated to include: lower
In a large case study of an international airline company, EGIT’s benefits were demonstrated to include: lower
IT-related continuity costs, increased IT-enabled innovation capacity, increased alignment between digital investments
related continuity costs, increased IT-enabled innovation capacity, increased alignment between digital investments
and business goals
and business goals and strategyand strategy, increased trust between business , increased trust between business and IT, and a shift toward and IT, and a shift toward a “value mindset” arounda “value mindset” around
digital assets.
digital assets.22
2
2
Research has shown that enterprises with poorly designed or adopted approaches to EGIT perform worse in aligning
Research has shown that enterprises with poorly designed or adopted approaches to EGIT perform worse in aligning
business and I&T stra
business and I&T strategies and processetegies and processes. As a result, such es. As a result, such enterprises are mucnterprises are much less likely to achieh less likely to achieve ve their their
intended business strategies and realize the business
intended business strategies and realize the business value they expect from digital transformation.value they expect from digital transformation.33
3
3
From this, it is
From this, it is clear that governance has to be understood and implemented much beyond the often encountered (i.e.,clear that governance has to be understood and implemented much beyond the often encountered (i.e.,
narrow) interpretation suggested by the governance, risk
narrow) interpretation suggested by the governance, risk and compliance (GRC) acronym. The GRC acronym itself and compliance (GRC) acronym. The GRC acronym itself
implicitly suggests that compliance and related risk represent the
implicitly suggests that compliance and related risk represent the spectrum of governance.spectrum of governance.
1.3
1.3
COBIT
COBIT
as
as
an
an
I&T
I&T
Governance
Governance
Framework
Framework
Over the years, best-practice frameworks have been developed and promoted to assist in the process of
Over the years, best-practice frameworks have been developed and promoted to assist in the process of
understanding, designing and implementing EGIT. COBIT
understanding, designing and implementing EGIT. COBIT®®2019 builds on and integrates more than 25 years 2019 builds on and integrates more than 25 years of of development in this field, not
development in this field, not only incorporating new insights from science, but only incorporating new insights from science, but also operationalizing these insightsalso operationalizing these insights
as practices.
as practices.
From its foundation in the IT audit community, COBIT
From its foundation in the IT audit community, COBIT®®has developed into a has developed into a broader and more comprehensive I&Tbroader and more comprehensive I&T governance and management framework and continues to establish itself as
governance and management framework and continues to establish itself as a generally accepted framework for I&Ta generally accepted framework for I&T
governance.
governance.
2
222 De Haes, S.; De Haes, S.; W. van Grembergen;W. van Grembergen; Enterprise Governance of IT Enterprise Governance of IT: Achieving Alignment and : Achieving Alignment and VValue, Featuring COBIT 5alue, Featuring COBIT 5, Springer International, Springer International Publishing, Switzerland, 2nd ed. 2015,
Publishing, Switzerland, 2nd ed. 2015,https://wwwhttps://www.springer.springer.com/us/book/97833191.com/us/book/978331914546445464 3
3 3
3 De Haes, Steven; A. Joshi; W. van Grembergen; “State and Impact of Governance of Enterprise IT iDe Haes, Steven; A. Joshi; W. van Grembergen; “State and Impact of Governance of Enterprise IT in Organizations: Key Findings of an Internationaln Organizations: Key Findings of an International
Study,”
f-governance-of-enterprise-it-INTRODUCTION
INTRODUCTION
1.3.1
1.3.1 What What Is Is COBIT COBIT and and What What Is Is It It Not?Not?
Before describing the updated COBIT framewor
Before describing the updated COBIT framework, it is k, it is important to explain what COBIT is and is not:important to explain what COBIT is and is not:
COBIT is a framework for the governance and management of enterprise information and technology,
COBIT is a framework for the governance and management of enterprise information and technology,44
4
4aimed at theaimed at the
whole enterprise. Enterprise I&T means all the technology and
whole enterprise. Enterprise I&T means all the technology and information processing the enterprise puts in place information processing the enterprise puts in place toto
achieve its goals, regardless of where this happens in the
achieve its goals, regardless of where this happens in the enterprise. In other words, enterprise I&T is not limited toenterprise. In other words, enterprise I&T is not limited to
the IT department of an
the IT department of an organizatiorganization, but certainly includes it.on, but certainly includes it.
The COBIT framework makes a clear
The COBIT framework makes a clear distinction between governance and managementdistinction between governance and management. These two . These two disciplinesdisciplines
encompass different activities, require different organizatio
encompass different activities, require different organizational structures and nal structures and serve different purposes.serve different purposes.
Governance
Governance ensures that:ensures that:
Stakeholder needs, conditions and options are
Stakeholder needs, conditions and options are evaluated to determine balanced, agreed-on enterprise objectiveevaluated to determine balanced, agreed-on enterprise objectives.s.
Direction is set through
Direction is set through prioritizatioprioritization and decision n and decision making.making.
Performance and compliance are monitored against
Performance and compliance are monitored against agreed-on direction and objectives.agreed-on direction and objectives.
In most enterprises, overall governance is the responsibility of the board of directors, under the leadership of the
In most enterprises, overall governance is the responsibility of the board of directors, under the leadership of the
chairperson. Specific governance responsibilities may be
chairperson. Specific governance responsibilities may be delegated to special organizational structures at andelegated to special organizational structures at an
appropriate level, particularly in
appropriate level, particularly in largerlarger, , complex enterprises.complex enterprises.
Management
Management plans, builds, runs and monit plans, builds, runs and monitors activities, in alors activities, in alignment with the diignment with the direction set by the govrection set by the governanceernance
body
body, to achieve the ent, to achieve the enterprise objectiveerprise objectives.s.
In most enterprises, management is the
In most enterprises, management is the responsibility of the executive management, under the leadership of the responsibility of the executive management, under the leadership of the chief chief
executive officer (CEO).
executive officer (CEO).
COBIT defines the components to build
COBIT defines the components to build and sustain a and sustain a governance system: processes, organizatiogovernance system: processes, organizational structures,nal structures,
policies and proc
policies and procedures, information fedures, information flows, culture and behavlows, culture and behaviors, skills, and infrastructiors, skills, and infrastructure.ure.55
5
5
COBIT defines the design factors that should be considered by the enterprise to build a best-fit governance system.
COBIT defines the design factors that should be considered by the enterprise to build a best-fit governance system.
COBIT addresses governance issues by grouping relevant governance components into governance and
COBIT addresses governance issues by grouping relevant governance components into governance and managementmanagement
objectives that can be managed to
objectives that can be managed to the required capability levels.the required capability levels.
Several misconception
Several misconceptions about COBIT should s about COBIT should be dispelled:be dispelled:
COBIT is not a full description of the
COBIT is not a full description of the whole IT environment of an enterprise.whole IT environment of an enterprise.
COBIT is not a framework to organize business processes.
COBIT is not a framework to organize business processes.
COBIT is not an (IT-)technical framework to manage all technology.
COBIT is not an (IT-)technical framework to manage all technology.
COBIT does not make or prescribe any IT-re
COBIT does not make or prescribe any IT-related decisions. It will not decide what the best IT strategy is, lated decisions. It will not decide what the best IT strategy is, what thewhat the
best architectu
best architecture is, or how much IT can ore is, or how much IT can or should cost. Ratherr should cost. Rather, COBIT defines a, COBIT defines all the componentll the components that describes that describe
which decisions should be taken, and how and
which decisions should be taken, and how and by whom they should be taken.by whom they should be taken.
4
4 4
4 Throughout this publication, references to the “framework for tThroughout this publication, references to the “framework for the governance of IT” imply the he governance of IT” imply the entirety of this description.entirety of this description.
5
1.4
1.4
Structure
Structure
of
of
This
This
Publication
Publication
The remainder of this
The remainder of this publication contains the following chapters:publication contains the following chapters:
Chapter 2 discusses the target audience for COBIT.
Chapter 2 discusses the target audience for COBIT.
Chapter 3 explains the
Chapter 3 explains the principles for governance systems for I&T, and the principles for principles for governance systems for I&T, and the principles for good governancegood governance
frameworks.
frameworks.
Chapter 4 explains the basic concepts and terminology of COBIT
Chapter 4 explains the basic concepts and terminology of COBIT®®2019, including the updated core 2019, including the updated core COBIT modelCOBIT model
with its 40
with its 40 governance and management objectivegovernance and management objectives.s.
Chapter 5 elaborates on the
Chapter 5 elaborates on the 40 governance and management objectives.40 governance and management objectives.
Chapter 6 explains how
Chapter 6 explains how performance monitoring in COBITperformance monitoring in COBIT®®2019 is conceived and, 2019 is conceived and, in particular, how Capabilityin particular, how Capability
Maturity Model Integration (CMMI
Maturity Model Integration (CMMI®®)-inspired capability levels are )-inspired capability levels are introduced.introduced. Chapter 7 contains a brief introduction and overview of the workflow of the
Chapter 7 contains a brief introduction and overview of the workflow of the COBIT COBIT ®®2019 Design Guide2019 Design Guide..
Chapter 8 contains a brief introduction and overview of the
Chapter 8 contains a brief introduction and overview of the COBIT COBIT ®®2019 Implementation Guide2019 Implementation Guide..
Chapter 9 contains a
Chapter 9 contains a detailed example to illustrate making the case for detailed example to illustrate making the case for the adoption and implementation of COBITthe adoption and implementation of COBIT
in an enterprise.
in an enterprise.
Chapter 10 lists the standards, frameworks and regulations that have been used during the development of COBIT
Chapter 10 lists the standards, frameworks and regulations that have been used during the development of COBIT®®
2019.
INTENDED
INTENDED
A
A
UDIENCE
UDIENCE
Chapter 2
Chapter 2
Intended Audience
Intended Audience
2.1
2.1
Governance
Governance
Stakeholders
Stakeholders
The target audience for COBIT is the
The target audience for COBIT is the stakeholders for EGIT and, by stakeholders for EGIT and, by extension, stakeholders for corporateextension, stakeholders for corporate
governance. These stakeholder
governance. These stakeholders and s and the benefits they can gain the benefits they can gain from COBIT are shown from COBIT are shown inin figure 2.1figure 2.1..
A certain level of experience and a thorough
A certain level of experience and a thorough understanding of the enterprise are required to understanding of the enterprise are required to benefit from the COBITbenefit from the COBIT
framework. Such experience and understanding allow users to
framework. Such experience and understanding allow users to customize core COBIT guidance—which is generic incustomize core COBIT guidance—which is generic in
nature—into tailored and focused guidance for the enterprise, taking into
nature—into tailored and focused guidance for the enterprise, taking into account the enterprise’account the enterprise’s context.s context.
The target audience includes those responsible during the whole
The target audience includes those responsible during the whole life cycle of the life cycle of the governance solution, from design togovernance solution, from design to
execution to assurance. Indeed, assurance providers may apply
execution to assurance. Indeed, assurance providers may apply the logic and workflow the logic and workflow developed in this publicationdeveloped in this publication
to create a
to create a well substantiated assurance program for the enterprise.well substantiated assurance program for the enterprise.
Figure 2.1—COBIT
Figure 2.1—COBIT StakeholdersStakeholders
S
Sttaakkeehhoollddeerr BBeenneefifit t oof f CCOOBBIITT
Internal Stakeholders
Internal Stakeholders
Boards
Boards Provides insights on how to get value from the use of I&T and explainsProvides insights on how to get value from the use of I&T and explains
relevant board responsibilities
relevant board responsibilities
Executive Management
Executive Management Provides guidance on how to organize and monitor performance of Provides guidance on how to organize and monitor performance of I&TI&T
across the enterprise
across the enterprise
Business Managers
Business Managers Helps to understand how to obtain the I&T solutions enterprises requireHelps to understand how to obtain the I&T solutions enterprises require
and how best to
and how best to exploit new technology for new exploit new technology for new strategstrategic opportunitiesic opportunities
IT Managers
IT Managers Provides guidance on how best to build and structure the IT department,Provides guidance on how best to build and structure the IT department,
manage performance of IT, run an efficient and effective IT operation,
manage performance of IT, run an efficient and effective IT operation,
control IT costs, align IT strategy to business priorities, etc.
control IT costs, align IT strategy to business priorities, etc.
Assurance Providers
Assurance Providers Helps to manage dependency on external service providers, getHelps to manage dependency on external service providers, get
assurance over IT, and ensure the existence of an effective and efficient
assurance over IT, and ensure the existence of an effective and efficient
system of internal controls
system of internal controls
Risk Management
Risk Management Helps to ensure the identification and management of all IT-related riskHelps to ensure the identification and management of all IT-related risk
External Stakeholders
External Stakeholders
Regulators
Regulators Helps to ensure the enterprise is compliant with applicable rules andHelps to ensure the enterprise is compliant with applicable rules and
regulations and has the right governance system in place to manage and
regulations and has the right governance system in place to manage and
sustain compliance
sustain compliance
Business Partners
Business Partners Helps to ensure that a business partner’s operations are secure, reliableHelps to ensure that a business partner’s operations are secure, reliable
and compliant with
and compliant with applicable rules and regulationsapplicable rules and regulations
IT Vendors
IT Vendors Helps to ensure that an IT vendor’s operations are secure, reliable andHelps to ensure that an IT vendor’s operations are secure, reliable and
compliant with applicable rules and
Page intentionally left blank
COBIT PRINCIPLES
COBIT PRINCIPLES
Chapter 3
Chapter 3
COBIT Principles
COBIT Principles
3.1 Introduction
3.1 Introduction
COBITCOBIT®®2019 was developed based on two sets 2019 was developed based on two sets of principles:of principles: Principles that describe the core requirements of
Principles that describe the core requirements of aa governance systemgovernance systemfor enterprise information and for enterprise information and technologytechnology
Principles for a
Principles for agovernance framework governance framework that can be used to build that can be used to build a governance system for the enterprisea governance system for the enterprise
3.2
3.2
Six
Six
Principle
Principle
s
s
for
for
a
a
Governance
Governance
System
System
The six principles for a governance system are (
The six principles for a governance system are (figure 3.1figure 3.1):):
Each enterprise needs a governance system to satisfy stakeholder needs and to generate value from the use of
Each enterprise needs a governance system to satisfy stakeholder needs and to generate value from the use of
1.
1.
I&T. Value reflects a balance among benefits, risk and resources, and enterprises need an actionable strategy and
I&T. Value reflects a balance among benefits, risk and resources, and enterprises need an actionable strategy and
governance system to realize this value.
governance system to realize this value.
A governance system for enterprise I&T is built from a number of components that can be of different types and
A governance system for enterprise I&T is built from a number of components that can be of different types and
2.
2.
that work together in a holistic way.
that work together in a holistic way.
A governance system should be dynamic. This means that each time one or more of the design factors are
A governance system should be dynamic. This means that each time one or more of the design factors are
3.
3.
changed (e.g., a change in strategy or
changed (e.g., a change in strategy or technology), the impact of these changes on the EGIT system must betechnology), the impact of these changes on the EGIT system must be
considered. A dy
considered. A dynamic view of EGIT will namic view of EGIT will lead toward a viable lead toward a viable and future-proof EGIT system.and future-proof EGIT system.
A governance system should clearly
A governance system should clearly distinguish between governance and management activities and distinguish between governance and management activities and structures.structures.
4.
4.
A governance system should be tailored to the enterprise’
A governance system should be tailored to the enterprise’s needs, using a s needs, using a set of design factors as set of design factors as parameters toparameters to
5.
5.
customize and prioritize the
customize and prioritize the governance system components.governance system components.
A governance system should cover the enterprise end to end, focusing not only on the IT function but
A governance system should cover the enterprise end to end, focusing not only on the IT function but on allon all
6.
6.
technology and information processing the enterpri
technology and information processing the enterprise puts in place to se puts in place to achieve its goals, regardless where theachieve its goals, regardless where the
processing is locate
processing is located in the enterprise.d in the enterprise.66
1
1
1
1 6
6 Huygh, THuygh, T.; S. De Haes; .; S. De Haes; “Using the Viable System Model to Study IT Governance Dynamics: Evidence “Using the Viable System Model to Study IT Governance Dynamics: Evidence from a Single Case Study,”from a Single Case Study,” Proceedings of the Proceedings of the
51
51 st st Hawaii International Con Hawaii International Conference on System Sciencesference on System Sciences, 2018,, 2018,https://scholarspace.manoa.hahttps://scholarspace.manoa.hawaii.edu/bitstream/10125waii.edu/bitstream/10125/50501/1/paper0614./50501/1/paper0614.pdf pdf Figure 3.1—Governance System
Figure 3.1—Governance System PrinciplesPrinciples
1. Provide
1. Provide
Stakeholder
Stakeholder
Value
Value
2. Holistic
2. Holistic
Approach
Approach
3. Dynamic
3. Dynamic
Governance
Governance
System
System
4. Governance
4. Governance
Distinct From
Distinct From
Management
Management
5. Tailored to
5. Tailored to
Enterprise
Enterprise
Needs
Needs
6. End-to-End
6. End-to-End
Governance
Governance
System
System
3.3
3.3
Three
Three
Principle
Principle
s
s
for
for
a
a
Governance
Governance
Framework
Framework
The three principles for a governance framework are (
The three principles for a governance framework are (figure 3.2figure 3.2):):
A governance framework should be based on
A governance framework should be based on a conceptual model, identifying the key components anda conceptual model, identifying the key components and
1.
1.
relationships among components, to
relationships among components, to maximize consistency and allow automation.maximize consistency and allow automation.
A governanc
A governance framework should be open and flexible. It should e framework should be open and flexible. It should allow the addition of new content and the abilityallow the addition of new content and the ability
2.
2.
to address new
to address new issues in the issues in the most flexible way, while maintaining integrity and consistencymost flexible way, while maintaining integrity and consistency..
A governance framework should align to relevant major related standards, frameworks and
A governance framework should align to relevant major related standards, frameworks and regulations.regulations.
3.
3.
3.4 COBIT
3.4 COBIT
®®2019
2019
COBIT
COBIT®®2019 improves on prior versions of COBIT in 2019 improves on prior versions of COBIT in the following areas:the following areas: Flexibility and openness
Flexibility and openness —The definiti —The definition and use of design facton and use of design factors allow COBIT to be tors allow COBIT to be tailored for betteailored for better r
alignment with a user’s particular context. The COBIT open architecture enables adding new
alignment with a user’s particular context. The COBIT open architecture enables adding new focus areas (seefocus areas (see
section 4.4) or modifying existing ones, without direct implications for the structure and content of the COBIT
section 4.4) or modifying existing ones, without direct implications for the structure and content of the COBIT
core model.
core model.
Currency and relevance
Currency and relevance —The COBIT m —The COBIT model supports referencodel supports referencing and alignmeing and alignment to concepts originnt to concepts originating in other ating in other
sources (e.g., the
sources (e.g., the latest IT standards and compliance regulations).latest IT standards and compliance regulations).
Prescriptive application
Prescriptive application —Models such as COBIT —Models such as COBIT can be descriptivcan be descriptive and prescriptivee and prescriptive. The COBIT co. The COBIT conceptualnceptual
model is constructed and presented such
model is constructed and presented such that its instantiation (i.e., the that its instantiation (i.e., the application of tailored COBIT governanceapplication of tailored COBIT governance
components) is perceived as a
components) is perceived as a prescription for a tailored IT governance system.prescription for a tailored IT governance system.
Performanc
Performance management of e management of ITIT —The structure of th —The structure of the COBIT performe COBIT performance managemance management model is integent model is integrated intorated into
the conceptual model. The maturity and capability concepts are introduced for better
the conceptual model. The maturity and capability concepts are introduced for better alignment with CMMI.alignment with CMMI.
COBIT guidance uses the terms
COBIT guidance uses the terms governance of enterprise information and technologygovernance of enterprise information and technology, enterprise governance of , enterprise governance of
information and technology, governance of IT and IT governance interchangeably.
information and technology, governance of IT and IT governance interchangeably.
Figure 3.2—Governance Framework
Figure 3.2—Governance Framework PrinciplesPrinciples
1. Based on 1. Based on Conceptual Conceptual Model Model 2. Open and 2. Open and Flexible Flexible 3. Aligned to 3. Aligned to Major Standards Major Standards