A NEW CELLULAR VERSION OF BLACKERS-MASSEY
WOJCIECH CHACH ´ OLSKI AND J ´ ER ˆ OME SCHERER
Abstract. Consider a push-out diagram of spaces C ← A → B, construct the homotopy push- out, and then the homotopy pull-back of the diagram one gets by forgetting the initial object A. Wwe compare the difference between A and this homotopy pull-back. This difference is measured in terms of the homotopy fibers of the original maps. Restricting our attention to the connectivity of these maps, we recover the classical Blakers-Massey Theorem.
Introduction
This is a very preliminary version. It contains complete proofs, but not all the background and applications! We write F ib(f ) for the homotopy fiber of the map f : A → B. When B is not connected, the homotopy type of these fibers might vary, depending on the chosen base point in B. In the following statement F ib(f ) means then the wedge of all homotopy fibers.
We use the notation X > A when the space X is “killed by A”, i.e. the nullification functor P A
kills X in the sense that P A X ' ∗. In other words, the space X belongs to the smallest collection of spaces closed under weak equivalences, homotopy colimits, and extensions by fibrations. The coaugmented functor Id → P A is Bousfield localization with respect to the map A → ∗.
Theorem 5.1. We consider a homotopy push-out square of the form
A f //
g
B
h
C k // D
and set F = F ib(f ) and G = F ib(g). If the total fiber T of the square is connected, then T >
ΩF ∗ ΩG.
If P denotes the homotopy pull-back of the diagram C → D ← B, then the total fiber of the square is by definition the homotopy fiber of the canonical map A → P . It thus truly measures the difference between A and P , hence the failure of the homotopy push-out square to be a homo- topy pull-back square. If we focus only on the connectivity of F and G, we obtain the following consequence, which is Goodwillie’s version of the Blakers-Massey Theorem for squares, [5].
2000 Mathematics Subject Classification. Primary 55S45; Secondary 55R15, 55R70, 55P20, 22F50.
1
Theorem 5.1. We consider a homotopy push-out square of the form
A f //
g
B
h
C k // D
If F = F ib(f ) is m-connected and G = F ib(g) is n-connected, then the total fiber is (m + n)- connected.
We can also prove higher dimensional, cubical, analogues of the above theorem, which generalize Goodwillie’s hypercubical statements (but they are not in this note). Our theorem also improves the cellular Blakers-Massey Theorem obtained by the first author [3, Theorem 1.B]. There, the inequality was obtained for the homotopy fiber of the suspension of the map A → P . It is in general impossible to “desuspend” such an inequality, [2], but always easy to suspend ours.
Acknowledgments.
1. Notation and known results
Given a map f : A → B, the homotopy fiber depends on the choice of a base point in B. If we fix such a base point b ∈ B we write F ib b (f ) for the homotopy fiber over b (and its homotopy type only depends on the connected component in which b lies). However we will be mostly interested in global properties of maps and diagrams. Therefore, when we write simply F ib(f ) we mean the collection of all homotopy fibers. From the point of view of cellular and acyclic classes we can think of F ib(f ) as the wedge of F ib b (f ) where b runs over a set of points b, one in each connected component of B.
Given a commutative square
A //
B
C // D
there is a natural map from A to the homotopy pull-back P of the square of which we removed A, i.e. the diagram B → D ← C. The total fiber, which we often denote by T , is the homotopy fiber of the map A → P . Alternatively it can be constructed as the homotopy fiber of the induced map on horizontal homotopy fibers F ib(A → B) → F ib(C → D).
Remark 1.1. We can always assume that the homotopy push-out is a connected space. If it is
not the case, let us pick a connected component D α ⊂ D and consider the preimages A α ⊂ A,
B α ⊂ B, and C α ⊂ C of D α . The fibers and total fibers of the homotopy push-out diagram A α //
B α
C α // D α
are some of the fibers and total fibers of the original diagram. Therefore, if the inequality we are looking for holds for this diagram, for any α, then it holds also for the original diagram.
We write X > A, or X ∈ C(A) and say that A kills X when the nullification functor P A “kills”
X, i.e. P A X is contractible. The following lemma is in fact the main defining property of the acyclic classes C(A), namely the closure under extensions by fibrations.
Lemma 1.2. Consider a fibration sequence F → E → B. Then E > F ∨ B.
Recall also that a non-connected space kills all spaces because the inequality X > S 0 holds for any space X.
Lemma 1.3. In a homotopy push-out square, F ib(C → D) > F ib(A → B).
Proof. By the previous remark we can suppose that D is connected. Now, if C is not connected, the homotopy fiber F ib(C → D) is not connected either, but since D is connected, there is at least one component in B over which the homotopy fiber is not connected. Therefore the inequality F ib(C → D) > F ib(A → B) holds trivially in this case.
Let us thus assume that C is connected. When B is connected as well, the result has been proven by the first author in [2, Theorem 3.4 (1)]. This allows us to start the (transfinite) induction on the number of components of B. Let us order the components and for any cardinal α call B α ⊂ B the union of the first α components. We can assume that π 0 A ∼ = π 0 B (if not, the claim is obvious) and define D α to be the homotopy push-out of the diagram C ← A α → B α . For a successor β = α + 1 we see that D β is the homotopy push-out of D α ← C → D 0 where D 0 is the homotopy push-out of connected spaces C ← A 0 → B 0 and A β = A α ` A 0 and B β = B α ` B 0 . We have therefore a fibration
F ib(C → D α ) → F ib(C → D β ) → F ib(D α → D β ).
By induction hypothesis F ib(C → D α ) > F ib(A α → B α ) and from the connected case we deduce that F ib(D α → D β ) > F ib(C → D 0 ) > F ib(A 0 → B 0 ). This proves the claim for D β . When β is a limit ordinal, we conclude by a similar argument using a telescope instead of a push-out.
Here is an example which illustrates both the necessity to deal with non-connected spaces and
the importance to consider all homotopy fibers at once.
Example 1.4. Let f : S 1 ` S 1 ,→ D 2 ` S 1 be the disjoint union of the inclusion of the circle as boundary of the disc and the identity. Consider the (homotopy) push-out diagram
S 1 ` S 1 //
D 2 ` S 1
S 1 // D 2
where the left hand-side vertical map is the fold map (the identity on both copies of the circle).
The homotopy pull-back is the disjoint union S 1 × D 2 ` S 1 × S 1 and there are thus two total fibers, a point and ΩS 1 ' Z.
Lemma 1.5. (Chach´ olski, [2, Theorem 7.2]) For any connected space X, the homotopy fiber of the map X → ΩΣX which is adjoint to the identity on ΣX, is killed by ΩX ∗ ΩX.
2. Reduction to a point
Homotopy push-out diagrams in which the terminal object is a point are easier to handle because the homotopy pull-back one needs to form in order to compute the total fiber is simply a product.
The aim of this section is to reduce the Blakers-Massey theorem to this situation. Recall from Remark 1.1 that we can always assume that it is connected.
Given a commutative push-out square
A f //
g
B
h
C k // D
we denote by F the homotopy fiber F ib(f ) and by G the homotopy fiber F ib(g). We will also need the homotopy fibers over D, namely A 0 = F ib(A − hf − → D), B 0 = F ib(h) and C 0 = F ib(k).
Proposition 2.1. For any homotopy push-out square as above the commutative square of homotopy fibers over a connected space D:
A 0 f
0