metal-organic papers
Acta Cryst.(2005). E61, m1117–m1119 doi:10.1107/S1600536805014625 Gaoet al. [Mg(C
11H14O6)(CH4O)2]
m1117
Acta Crystallographica Section EStructure Reports Online
ISSN 1600-5368
Poly[[dimethanolmagnesium(II)]-
l
-
p
-phenylenedioxy-diacetato]: a three-dimensional magnesium(II)
coordination polymer
Shan Gao,a* Ji-Wei Liu,a,bLi-Hua Huoaand Hui Zhaoa
a
Laboratory of Functional Materials, School of Chemistry and Materials Science, Heilongjiang University, Harbin 150080, People’s Republic of China, andbCollege of Chemistry and
Chemical Technology, Da Qing Petroleum Institute, Da Qing 163318, People’s Republic of China
Correspondence e-mail: shangao67@yahoo.com
Key indicators
Single-crystal X-ray study
T= 295 K
Mean(C–C) = 0.005 A˚
Rfactor = 0.063
wRfactor = 0.166
Data-to-parameter ratio = 13.0
For details of how these key indicators were automatically derived from the article, see http://journals.iucr.org/e.
#2005 International Union of Crystallography
Printed in Great Britain – all rights reserved
The MgII ion and the 1,4-BDOA2 ligand in the title coordination polymer, [Mg(1,4-BDOA)(CH3OH)2]n (where 1,4-BDOA2 is the p-phenylenedioxydiacetate dianion, C10H8O6
2
), lie on inversion centers. The MgIIcenter has an octahedral coordination geometry defined by four carboxyl O atoms from four different 1,4-BDOA2 ligands and two hydroxy O atoms from two methanol molecules. The MgII atoms are bridged by 1,4-BDOA2ligands, leading to a three-dimensional infinite network structure.
Comment
The coordination chemistry of the alkaline earth metals has, until recently, remained a largely underdeveloped area (Senet al., 2003). Although transition metal carboxylates have been widely investigated (Reyeset al., 2003), reports on magnesium coordination polymers with carboxylate ligands are very rare (Wang et al., 1994). The flexible benzene-1,4-dioxydiacetic acid (1,4-BDOAH2) exhibits high symmetry and versatile
binding modes, and hence it could generate various supra-molecular architectures. Previously, our group has reported some one- and two-dimensional transition metal coordination polymers incorporating this ligand, in which the 1,4-BDOA2 group shows the capability of acting as a bridging ligand in various coordination modes, including bidentate (Gao et al., 2004a), tridentate (Gaoet al., 2004b), tetradentate (Gao, Liu, Huo, Xu & Zhao, 2005) and hexadentate (Gao, Liu, Huo, Zhao & Zhao, 2005). As part of our continuing investigations into the coordination behavior of this ligand, we report here the crystal structure of a new three-dimensional coordination polymer, [Mg(1,4-BDOA)(CH3OH)2]n, (I).
As shown in Fig. 1, the MgIIatom and 1,4-BDOA2ligand
lie on inversion centers, and the fully deprotonated
carboxylate groups are bonded to the MgIIions in a mono-dentate fashion. Each MgIIatom is covalently bonded to four carboxyl O atoms from four different 1,4-BDOA2 ligands and two hydroxy O atoms from two coordinated methanol molecules, displaying an approximate octahedral coordination
configuration. Methanol atom O4 not only engages in coor-dination but also forms an intramolecular hydrogen bond with the coordinated carboxyl atom O2, consolidating the structure (Table 2).
Two adjacent MgII atoms are linked through one bis-(monodentate) carboxyl group, with an Mg1 Mg1Adistance of 5.320 (3) A˚ [symmetry code: (A)x+ 1,y12,z+12]. Pairs
of MgIIatoms are further connectedviafour carboxyl O atoms
of one 1,4-BDOA2
ligand, with Mg1 Mg1B [symmetry code: (B)x,y+1
2,z+ 1
2] and Mg1 Mg1C[symmetry code:
(C)x1,y,z+ 1] distances of 13.273 (3) and 14.278 (3) A˚ , respectively. It can be seen from a perspective view of the title complex along thecaxis (Fig. 2) that each 1,4-BDOA2group acts as a tetrakis(monodentate) ligand to link four MgIIions, resulting in the formation of a regular three-dimensional open framework with a triangular channel, which holds the coor-dinated methanol.
Experimental
The 1,4-BDOAH2ligand was prepared by the reaction of chloro-acetic acid with hydroquinol (Mirci, 1990). The title complex was prepared by the addition of magnesium perchlorate hexahydrate (5.13 g, 20 mmol) to a methanol solution (20 ml) containing 1,4-BDOAH2(4.52 g, 20 mmol), and the pH value was adjusted to 7 with 0.1MNaOH solution. The resulting solution was stirred for 30 min at room temperature and then filtered. Colorless prismatic single crys-tals were isolated from the solution at room temperature over a period of several days. Analysis calculated for C12H16O8Mg: C 46.11, H 5.16%; found: C 46.13, H 5.12%.
Crystal data
[Mg(C11H14O6)(CH4O)2] Mr= 312.56
Monoclinic, P21=c a= 12.070 (2) A˚
b= 7.7088 (15) A˚
c= 7.3332 (15) A˚
= 91.42 (3)
V= 682.1 (2) A˚3
Z= 2
Dx= 1.522 Mg m 3
MoKradiation Cell parameters from 4419
reflections
= 3.1–25.9
= 0.17 mm1
T= 295 (2) K Prism, colorless 0.230.180.08 mm
Data collection
Rigaku R-AXIS RAPID diffractometer
!scans
Absorption correction: multi-scan (ABSCOR; Higashi, 1995)
Tmin= 0.962,Tmax= 0.987
4471 measured reflections
1328 independent reflections 1082 reflections withI> 2(I)
Rint= 0.069 max= 26.0
h=14!14
k=9!9
l=9!8
Refinement
Refinement onF2 R[F2> 2(F2)] = 0.063 wR(F2) = 0.166 S= 1.08 1328 reflections 102 parameters
H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
w= 1/[2(F
o2) + (0.104P)2
+ 0.0721P]
whereP= (Fo2+ 2Fc2)/3
(/)max< 0.001
max= 0.38 e A˚
3
min=0.24 e A˚
3
Table 1
Selected geometric parameters (A˚ ,).
Mg1—O1 2.033 (2)
Mg1—O2i
2.111 (2)
Mg1—O4 2.080 (3)
O1—C1 1.246 (4)
O2—C1 1.259 (4)
O1ii
—Mg1—O1 180
O1—Mg1—O4 88.22 (10)
O1ii
—Mg1—O4 91.78 (10)
O1ii
—Mg1—O2i
93.03 (10)
O1—Mg1—O2i 86.97 (10)
O2i
—Mg1—O2iii
180
O4—Mg1—O2i 90.92 (11)
O4ii
—Mg1—O2i
89.08 (11) O4—Mg1—O4ii
180
Symmetry codes: (i) 1x;yþ1 2;
1
2z; (ii) 1x;1y;z; (iii)x; 1 2y;z
1 2.
Table 2
Hydrogen-bond geometry (A˚ ,).
D—H A D—H H A D A D—H A
O4—H7 O2 0.84 (3) 2.02 (2) 2.798 (3) 153 (4)
metal-organic papers
m1118
Gaoet al. [Mg(C11H14O6)(CH4O)2] Acta Cryst.(2005). E61, m1117–m1119
Figure 2
[image:2.610.311.564.67.289.2] [image:2.610.44.292.74.207.2]Packing diagram of the title complex, viewed along the c axis. The coordinated methanol molecules have been omitted for clarity; they occupy the apparent triangular channels.
Figure 1
ORTEPIIplot (Johnson, 1976) of the title complex, with displacement ellipsoids drawn at the 30% probability level. Hydrogen bonds are indicated by dotted lines. [Symmetry codes: (i) 1x, 1y,z; (ii) 1x, 1
2+y, 1
2z; (iii)x, 1 2y,z
1
2; (A) 1x,y 1 2,
1
2z; (B) 1 +x, 3 2y,
C-bound H atoms were placed in calculated positions, with C—H = 0.93 (aromatic), 0.96 (CH3) or 0.97 A˚ (CH2) andUiso(H) = 1.2Ueq(C) or 1.5Ueq(Cmethyl), and were refined in the riding-model approxima-tion. The hydroxy H atom of the methanol molecule was located in a difference Fourier map and refined with O—H and H H distance restraints of 0.85 (1) and 1.39 (1) A˚ , respectively, and Uiso(H) = 1.5Ueq(O).
Data collection:RAPID-AUTO(Rigaku Corporation, 1998); cell refinement: RAPID-AUTO; data reduction: CrystalStructure
(Rigaku/MSC, 2002); program(s) used to solve structure:SHELXS97
(Sheldrick, 1997); program(s) used to refine structure:SHELXL97
(Sheldrick, 1997); molecular graphics: ORTEPII (Johnson, 1976); software used to prepare material for publication:SHELXL97.
The authors thank the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 20101003), the Scientific Fund of Remarkable
Teachers of Heilongjiang Province (1054 G036) and
Heilongjiang University for supporting this work.
References
Gao, S., Liu, J. W., Huo, L. H., Xu, Y. M. & Zhao, H. (2005).Inorg. Chem. Commun.8, 361–364.
Gao, S., Liu, J.-W., Huo, L.-H., Zhao, H. & Zhao, J.-G. (2004a).Acta Cryst.E60, m1242–m1244.
Gao, S., Liu, J.-W., Huo, L.-H., Zhao, H. & Zhao, J.-G. (2004b).Acta Cryst.
E60, m1308–m1310.
Gao, S., Liu, J.-W., Huo, L.-H., Zhao, H. & Zhao, J.-G. (2005).Acta Cryst.C61, m25–m29.
Higashi, T. (1995).ABSCOR. Rigaku Corporation, Tokyo, Japan.
Johnson, C. K. (1976).ORTEPII. Report ORNL-5138. Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Tennessee, USA.
Mirci, L. E. (1990). Rom. Patent No. 07 43 205.
Reyes, G. Z., Jesu´s, R. Q. & Herbert, H. (2003).Inorg. Chem.42, 3835–3845. Rigaku Corporation (1998). RAPID-AUTO. Rigaku Corporation, Tokyo,
Japan.
Rigaku/MSC (2002). CrystalStructure. Rigaku/MSC Inc., 9009 New Trails Drive, The Woodlands, TX 77381-5209, USA.
Sen, S., Choudhury, C. R., Karan, N. K., Datta, A., Mitra, S., Singh, R. K. B. & Gramlich, V. (2003).Inorg. Chem. Commun.6, 1311–1314.
Sheldrick, G. M. (1997). SHELXL97 and SHELXS97. University of Go¨ttingen, Germany.
Wang, J. L., Bo, L. & Miao, F. M. (1994).Chin. J. Struct. Chem.13, 304–306.
metal-organic papers
Acta Cryst.(2005). E61, m1117–m1119 Gaoet al. [Mg(C
supporting information
sup-1
Acta Cryst. (2005). E61, m1117–m1119
supporting information
Acta Cryst. (2005). E61, m1117–m1119 [https://doi.org/10.1107/S1600536805014625]
Poly[[dimethanolmagnesium(II)]-
µ
-
p
-phenylenedioxydiacetato]: a
three-dimensional magnesium(II) coordination polymer
Shan Gao, Ji-Wei Liu, Li-Hua Huo and Hui Zhao
Poly[[dimethanolmagnesium(II)]-µ-p-phenylenedioxydiacetato]
Crystal data
[Mg(C11H14O6)(CH4O)2]
Mr = 312.56
Monoclinic, P21/c
Hall symbol: -P 2ybc a = 12.070 (2) Å b = 7.7088 (15) Å c = 7.3332 (15) Å β = 91.42 (3)° V = 682.1 (2) Å3
Z = 2
F(000) = 328 Dx = 1.522 Mg m−3
Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å Cell parameters from 4419 reflections θ = 3.1–25.9°
µ = 0.17 mm−1
T = 295 K Prism, colorless 0.23 × 0.18 × 0.08 mm
Data collection
Rigaku R-AXIS RAPID diffractometer
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube Graphite monochromator
Detector resolution: 10 pixels mm-1
ω scans
Absorption correction: multi-scan (ABSCOR; Higashi, 1995) Tmin = 0.962, Tmax = 0.987
4471 measured reflections 1328 independent reflections 1082 reflections with I > 2σ(I) Rint = 0.069
θmax = 26.0°, θmin = 3.1°
h = −14→14 k = −9→9 l = −9→8
Refinement Refinement on F2
Least-squares matrix: full R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.063
wR(F2) = 0.166
S = 1.08 1328 reflections 102 parameters 1 restraint
Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
w = 1/[σ2(F
o2) + (0.104P)2 + 0.0721P]
where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
(Δ/σ)max < 0.001
Δρmax = 0.38 e Å−3
supporting information
sup-2
Acta Cryst. (2005). E61, m1117–m1119
Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2)
x y z Uiso*/Ueq
Mg1 0.5000 0.5000 0.0000 0.0427 (5) O1 0.39720 (19) 0.4564 (3) 0.2107 (3) 0.0488 (7) O2 0.46913 (18) 0.2463 (3) 0.3838 (3) 0.0526 (7) O3 0.19968 (19) 0.4225 (4) 0.3396 (3) 0.0525 (7) O4 0.6278 (2) 0.3916 (3) 0.1577 (4) 0.0547 (7) C1 0.3919 (3) 0.3474 (4) 0.3356 (5) 0.0429 (8) C2 0.2849 (3) 0.3374 (5) 0.4409 (5) 0.0481 (9) C3 0.1010 (3) 0.4576 (5) 0.4257 (5) 0.0477 (9) C4 0.0726 (3) 0.3898 (5) 0.5930 (5) 0.0539 (9) C5 0.0284 (3) 0.5654 (5) 0.3338 (6) 0.0567 (10) C6 0.7304 (3) 0.3264 (6) 0.0986 (7) 0.0720 (12) H2A 0.2951 0.3926 0.5590 0.058* H2B 0.2649 0.2171 0.4604 0.058* H4 0.1207 0.3152 0.6556 0.065* H5 0.0472 0.6093 0.2206 0.068* H6A 0.7198 0.2123 0.0487 0.108* H6B 0.7820 0.3209 0.2002 0.108* H6C 0.7590 0.4017 0.0068 0.108* H7 0.596 (3) 0.321 (4) 0.227 (5) 0.066 (13)*
Atomic displacement parameters (Å2)
U11 U22 U33 U12 U13 U23
Mg1 0.0378 (9) 0.0473 (10) 0.0433 (9) −0.0019 (6) 0.0056 (7) −0.0012 (6) O1 0.0413 (13) 0.0542 (15) 0.0513 (15) 0.0033 (10) 0.0093 (11) 0.0086 (11) O2 0.0423 (14) 0.0537 (14) 0.0623 (16) 0.0087 (11) 0.0091 (12) 0.0099 (11) O3 0.0391 (13) 0.0685 (17) 0.0502 (15) 0.0091 (11) 0.0076 (10) 0.0080 (12) O4 0.0399 (13) 0.0686 (18) 0.0559 (15) 0.0009 (12) 0.0065 (11) 0.0106 (13) C1 0.0396 (18) 0.0417 (18) 0.0477 (18) −0.0008 (14) 0.0067 (14) −0.0004 (14) C2 0.0379 (18) 0.056 (2) 0.0505 (19) 0.0059 (15) 0.0066 (15) 0.0048 (15) C3 0.0380 (18) 0.055 (2) 0.050 (2) 0.0026 (15) 0.0031 (15) 0.0033 (15) C4 0.0406 (19) 0.064 (2) 0.058 (2) 0.0102 (16) 0.0053 (16) 0.0130 (17) C5 0.045 (2) 0.074 (3) 0.052 (2) 0.0050 (18) 0.0073 (16) 0.0135 (18) C6 0.064 (3) 0.073 (3) 0.080 (3) 0.016 (2) 0.008 (2) 0.005 (2)
Geometric parameters (Å, º)
Mg1—O1 2.033 (2) C1—C2 1.523 (4)
Mg1—O2i 2.111 (2) C2—H2A 0.970
Mg1—O4 2.080 (3) C2—H2B 0.970
O1—C1 1.246 (4) C3—C4 1.384 (5)
O2—C1 1.259 (4) C3—C5 1.373 (6)
Mg1—O1ii 2.033 (2) C4—C5v 1.387 (5)
Mg1—O2iii 2.111 (2) C4—H4 0.930
supporting information
sup-3
Acta Cryst. (2005). E61, m1117–m1119
O2—Mg1iv 2.111 (2) C5—H5 0.930
O3—C2 1.415 (4) C6—H6A 0.960
O3—C3 1.389 (4) C6—H6B 0.960
O4—C6 1.415 (5) C6—H6C 0.960
O4—H7 0.84 (3)
O1ii—Mg1—O1 180 O4—C6—H6B 109.5
O1—Mg1—O4 88.22 (10) O4—C6—H6C 109.5 O1ii—Mg1—O4 91.78 (10) C1—O1—Mg1 135.5 (2)
O1ii—Mg1—O2i 93.03 (10) C1—O2—Mg1iv 142.4 (2)
O1—Mg1—O2i 86.97 (10) C1—C2—H2A 109.9
O2i—Mg1—O2iii 180 C1—C2—H2B 109.9
O4—Mg1—O2i 90.92 (11) C3—O3—C2 118.2 (3)
O4ii—Mg1—O2i 89.08 (11) C3—C4—C5v 119.2 (4)
O4—Mg1—O4ii 180 C3—C4—H4 120.4
Mg1—O4—H7 105 (3) C3—C5—C4v 121.1 (4)
O1ii—Mg1—O2iii 86.97 (10) C3—C5—H5 119.4
O1—Mg1—O2iii 93.03 (10) C4—C3—O3 124.3 (3)
O1ii—Mg1—O4ii 88.22 (10) C4v—C5—H5 119.4
O1—Mg1—O4ii 91.78 (10) C5—C3—O3 116.0 (3)
O1—C1—O2 124.9 (3) C5—C3—C4 119.7 (3) O1—C1—C2 117.8 (3) C5v—C4—H4 120.4
O2—C1—C2 117.2 (3) C6—O4—Mg1 127.9 (3) O3—C2—C1 108.9 (3) C6—O4—H7 112 (3)
O3—C2—H2B 109.9 H2B—C2—H2A 108.3
O3—C2—H2A 109.9 H6A—C6—H6B 109.5
O4—Mg1—O2iii 89.08 (11) H6A—C6—H6C 109.5
O4ii—Mg1—O2iii 90.92 (11) H6B—C6—H6C 109.5
O4—C6—H6A 109.5
Mg1—O1—C1—O2 15.0 (6) O2iii—Mg1—O4—C6 68.7 (3)
Mg1—O1—C1—C2 −166.2 (2) O3—C3—C5—C4v −179.7 (4)
Mg1iv—O2—C1—O1 −151.1 (3) O3—C3—C4—C5v 179.8 (4)
Mg1iv—O2—C1—C2 30.1 (5) O4—Mg1—O1—C1 −29.9 (3)
O1ii—Mg1—O4—C6 −18.2 (3) O4ii—Mg1—O1—C1 150.1 (3)
O1—Mg1—O4—C6 161.8 (3) C2—O3—C3—C4 −11.5 (5) O1—C1—C2—O3 16.9 (5) C2—O3—C3—C5 169.3 (3) O2i—Mg1—O1—C1 −120.9 (3) C3—O3—C2—C1 −167.9 (3)
O2iii—Mg1—O1—C1 59.1 (3) C4—C3—C5—C4v 1.0 (7)
O2i—Mg1—O4—C6 −111.3 (3) C5—C3—C4—C5v −1.0 (7)
O2—C1—C2—O3 −164.2 (3)
Symmetry codes: (i) −x+1, y+1/2, −z+1/2; (ii) −x+1, −y+1, −z; (iii) x, −y+1/2, z−1/2; (iv) −x+1, y−1/2, −z+1/2; (v) −x, −y+1, −z+1.
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º)
D—H···A D—H H···A D···A D—H···A