• No results found

WHEN DOES OBESITY CONSTITUTE MEDICAL NEGLECT?

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "WHEN DOES OBESITY CONSTITUTE MEDICAL NEGLECT?"

Copied!
27
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

WHEN DOES OBESITY

CONSTITUTE

MEDICAL NEGLECT?

Graham Vimpani, Senior Clinical Advisor, Child Protection and Wellbeing, NSW Kids + Families, North Sydney

Jenny Marshall, Acting Director, Violence Prevention and Care, NSW Kids + Families, North Sydney

Wendy Thompson, Manager, Northern Child Wellbeing Unit, Newcastle

(2)

OVERVIEW

• AA was 8 year old boy who died in hospital from

complications of morbid obesity in 2010

• Case reviewed by NSW Ombudsman 2011-2012 to

identify and respond to systemic issues within and

between agencies

• NSW Health review in February, 2012

• Interagency review in Newcastle, 2012

• Coroner’s inquest and recommendations 2013-2015

• Lessons for child protection services, hospital child

protection teams and paediatric services more

generally

• How could the

Keep them Safe

reforms improve the

outcome?

(3)

CASE STUDY - 1

• AA was a morbidly obese boy who initially presented aged 7y 10m (May 2008) with sleep apnoea – managed in ICU (35Kg) • Despite risks of adding to weight gain, parents demonstrated

non-compliant and odd behaviour in hospital and subsequently • Referred to ICU dietician (low priority -> JHCH dietician) and

SW

• No other strategy identified to deal with signs of odd parental behaviour during the admission despite a past Hx of maternal drug abuse (including IV) being recorded in admission Hx

(4)

CASE STUDY - 2

• Referred to child protection team meeting (poorly staffed – annual RACP conference) and seen by paediatric SW

afterwards who decided Helpline referral unwarranted unless non-compliance with dietetic intervention posed a threat to health. Unclear who had responsibility for monitoring

implementation of recommendations relevant to Child Protection.

• Numerous episodes of non-attendance as OP with respiratory paediatricians, dietician, endocrine team. Parents heavy

smokers and equipment contaminated. SW referral by nursing to follow up on need for Community Services report but this didn’t occur (August 2008)

(5)

CASE STUDY - 3

• Reviewed by respiratory team Nov 2008 and major concerns about continuing weight gain and non-compliance were

documented but not labelled as medical neglect. Non follow-up of recommended ENT referral

• No dietician had made contact with AA since admission – numerous failed appointments

– adequacy of protocol of sending letters asking parents to contact for appointment for families who are resistant to engage

(6)

CASE STUDY - 4

• March 2009 CP review meeting  referral to Helpline following day. No documentation in health record of information

provided. Case referred to Charlestown Community Services Centre (medium risk) and after enquiries to school confirmed immobility, noisy breathing and poor attendance, case was closed because of competing priorities on 7 May 2009

• 7 May 2009 allegedly playing soccer for school – attended dietician (1st), respiratory team, given diet. Failed to attend

(7)

CASE STUDY - 5

• Readmitted June 2009 ?inter-current URTI, continuing non-compliance with diet and case conference held but attendance and outcomes not specifically documented although FU with dietetics, physio, respiratory, endocrine (still had not had

Glucose Tolerance Test - diabetes) and ENT organised.

• Morbid obesity now regarded as being at medical emergency stage. No mention of contact with school or CS.

(8)

CASE STUDY - 6

• Numerous failed appointments from the end of July 2009. After two visits in September 2009 to physio and dietician failed to attend respiratory clinic that month and was not seen by anyone of the treating team until September 2010.

• Risk Of Significant Harm report for non-attendance for OGTT made and concerns about “medical neglect” raised. No further report made when failed to attend again.

• Brought by parents to hospital in gross respiratory distress. Had a cardio-respiratory arrest outside the JHH Emergency

(9)

CASE STUDY - 7

Mother’s health

• Mother had extensive involvement with D&A services at Mater Hospital – on methadone but known to be intermittently using IV speed - during the 2008-2010 period

• An admission to JHH (15 May – June 29 2009) - (overlapped with AA’s second admission) for endocarditis related to drug use none of which was known to paediatric staff.

• ROSH report made on 17 May 2009 by D&A. Escalating IV use noted throughout July-August 2009 and Jan-March 2010

including heroin leading to a second ROSH report on

September 21 2009, which was closed unallocated because of competing priorities a week later.

(10)

CASE STUDY - 8

School

• AA’s Public School reported chronically poor school attendance and behaviour that was inconsistent with that being reported by the parents (E.g. ability to play soccer). No documented

contact with the school was made by paediatric staff.

• School said AA frequently fell asleep in class and was either sent home in care of parents or other children were asked to try to keep him awake in class

(11)

ISSUES FOR HEALTH STAFF

• Belief that parents were doing their best despite difficult circumstances and (in retrospect) unwarranted credulity in their story.

• Lack of understanding of parents’ perception of his weight (family belief that AA was same as other children in extended family who had been overweight but lost weight when teenagers)

• Non consideration of the family and social issues contributing to the

parent’s non-compliance. How might have these parents health problems be contributing to their non-compliance?

• Failure to name the parents non-compliant behaviour as medical neglect • Failure to recognise mother’s suspicious behaviour as a possible marker

(12)

ISSUES FOR HEALTH STAFF

• Absence of any contact with mother’s treating D&A and ID team when enquiries would have been legitimate and now facilitated by Chapter 16A

• Lack of interagency contact (school/education, CS) to check out story being given by parents

• No identifiable case manager

• Non-recognition of what the child protection team could offer – not invited to case conference prior to discharge on second admission

(13)

• Risk of Harm issues identified:

– Medical neglect – obesity, respiratory issues,

sleep apnoea (limited compliance with treatment

recommendations)

– Neglect – poor nutrition, failure to see dietician

– Carer concern – Drug use by mother and father;

mental health issues for mother

– Educational neglect – Habitual non-attendance

(14)

ISSUES FOR HEALTH STAFF

• No case conference with CS and school ever organised

• Under what circumstances does non-compliance with treatment in children with chronic and complex care needs become a child protection concern?

• Importance of consultation between treating clinical team and child protection team

(15)

INTERAGENCY

REVIEW

(16)

Case Study - Communication

Contact between agencies

– Health to CS - 7 (ROH and ROSH reports only)

– CS to Health – 1 (follow up on ROSH report by Health)

– CS to School – 2 (follow up on 2 ROSH reports by

Health)

– School to CS – Nil

– Health School – Nil

Some contact between some of the health services

involved, but no contact between Drug and Alcohol /

Hospital Services treating mother and Health Services

involved with Child

(17)

What went well? - Health

• Reports made to Community Services Helpline

• Some case meetings held with some members

(18)

What went well? – Community Services

• Significance of the need for the child to be

presented for medical treatment in March 2009

report was understood by the Intake

Caseworker who recommended CS monitoring

of appointment attendance & compliance

(19)

What went well? – Education

• School Learning Support team/Student Welfare Team

meeting regarding concerns about absenteeism in 2008;

• Parents advised of legislative requirements for school

attendance and the consequences for continued non

attendance in writing in October 2008;

• Referral to Home School Liaison Program by school in

November 2008;

• Timely follow up (3 home visits) by Home School Liaison

Officer (HSLO) following referral (during

November/December 2008).

• Child continued to be identified with poor school

attendance by HSLO in 2009/10.

(20)

Opportunities lost - Health

• Communication with other health services

• Communication with School

• Communication with Community Services

• Collaborative interagency practice

• Failure to engage fully with child protection

team

• Knowledge and recognition of child protection

concerns – especially in relation to medical

neglect

• Reporting of child protection concerns

• Active follow up of non-attendance

(21)

Opportunities lost – Community Services

• Reports could have been the catalyst for:

• Detailed information gathering &

understanding of

AA’s health condition & its

potential fatal consequences

• Engagement with parents re their ability to

understand & respond to AA’s medical needs

& treatment regime

• Formation of a partnership between CS &

Health re risk management

(22)

Opportunities lost – Education

• Early intervention when absences first became an issue;

• Early engagement of parents regarding medical needs of the child and how they could be accommodated by the school;

• Need for re-referral for HSLO intervention when file was

closed at the end of 2008;

• Collaboration with other agencies and within the Department; • Lack of understanding of how Departmental policies and

guidelines applied in unique cases; and

• Lack of understanding of new reporting requirements under

(23)

KEEP THEM

(24)

Potential Benefits of Keep them Safe for similar

cases (progressively rolled out from early 2009)

• Mandatory Reporter’s Guide

• Child Wellbeing Units – assist with advocacy at

Helpline and CSCs; opportunity for appraisal of

cumulative harm; information exchange

• Chapter 16a legislation

• Training of all staff – child protection is everyone’s

business – your job doesn’t stop with a call to the

Helpline

– Awareness of the 70%:30% phenomenon and its

implications

(25)

CORONER’S

(26)

Coroner’s recommendations

• Weight Management Unit

• Child Protection Unit staff to monitor reports to

Helpline

• Child Protection Service to become a Unit

(27)

Broader Implications

• Child protection issues often arise in the management of children with chronic and complex health needs

– Eating disorders, diabetes, cystic fibrosis, cancer, school refusal due to chronic low-grade illness. Challenge for

clinicians to address child obesity if parents are also obese. • These groups of children are becoming more common in

paediatric practice

• Lead clinicians not always aware of how to negotiate the statutory child protection system

– Important supportive role of hospital child protection teams and interagency case review meetings

• Management protocols helpful tool

• Good documentation essential – SCAN protocol

References

Related documents

Earth has the letter of encouragement teenage girl diet to communicate the end up view the way to come for these letters i also know. Car you there, letter encouragement

[High-mix industries] lag in the adoption of Lean practices across the board primarily because the Lean techniques popularized by the Toyota Production System (TPS) can be

The responses to all questions regarding the impact of using a rubric as a student were generally positive, and students indicated that rubrics are important to their process

When variation in Coppice winter resident species composition was examined in relation to variation in habitat structure, Vireo griseus (White-eyed Vireo), Worm-eating

Quickly, a council of seven took control of the colony (by Company order) and the settlers divided into three groups: one to build a fort and housing within it; another to clear

Jessica must determine whether hedge funds are a suitable investment for Henry, and if not, is under no obligation to recommend specific funds to

The flow of data within each node is directed by an instance of a content broker, directing the flow of data from ingest into the archive, on the one hand, and that of derived copies

will lessen the click from the shaft of the drumstick and at the same time strengthen the sound of the jingles (see Marche du Soldat). ln Ragtime, when the