• No results found

Vol 6, No 11 (2015)

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2020

Share "Vol 6, No 11 (2015)"

Copied!
6
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

Available online throug

ISSN 2229 – 5046

HARARY EQUIENERGETIC GRAPHS

HARISHCHANDRA S. RAMANE

1

, VINAYAK V. MANJALAPUR*

2

1,2

Department of Mathematics, Karnatak University - Dharwad – 580000, India.

(Received On: 15-10-15; Revised & Accepted On: 05-11-15)

ABSTRACT

T

he Harary matrix or reciprocal distance matrix of a graph 𝐺𝐺 is defined as𝑅𝑅𝑅𝑅(𝐺𝐺) = [𝑟𝑟𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖] , in which 𝑟𝑟𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖 = 1

𝑑𝑑𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖 if 𝑖𝑖 ≠ 𝑖𝑖 and 𝑟𝑟𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖 = 0 if 𝑖𝑖=𝑖𝑖, where 𝑑𝑑𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖 is the distance between the 𝑖𝑖𝑡𝑡ℎ and 𝑖𝑖𝑡𝑡ℎ vertex of 𝐺𝐺. The Harary energy 𝐻𝐻𝐻𝐻(𝐺𝐺) of 𝐺𝐺 is defined as the sum of the absolute values of the eigenvalue of the Harary matrix of graph 𝐺𝐺. Two graphs 𝐺𝐺1 and 𝐺𝐺2 are said to be Harary equienergetic if𝐻𝐻𝐻𝐻(𝐺𝐺1) =𝐻𝐻𝐻𝐻(𝐺𝐺2). In this paper we obtain the Harary eigenvalues and Harary energy of the join of regular graphs of diameter less than or equal to two and thus construct the Harary equienergetic graphs on 𝑛𝑛 vertices, for all 𝑛𝑛 ≥6 having different Harary eigenvalues.

Mathematics Subject Classification: 05C50, 05C12.

Keywords: Harary eigenvalues, Harary energy, Harary equienergetic graphs, join of graphs.

1. INTRODUCTION

Let 𝐺𝐺 be a simple, connected graph with n vertices 𝑣𝑣1,𝑣𝑣2, … ,𝑣𝑣𝑛𝑛. The distance between the vertices 𝑣𝑣𝑖𝑖 and 𝑣𝑣𝑖𝑖, denoted by 𝑑𝑑𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖 =𝑑𝑑(𝑣𝑣𝑖𝑖,𝑣𝑣𝑖𝑖) is the length of shortest path joining them. The diameter of a graph 𝐺𝐺, denoted by 𝑑𝑑𝑖𝑖𝑑𝑑𝑑𝑑(𝐺𝐺), is the maximum distance between any pair of vertices of 𝐺𝐺 [1].

The Harary matrix (also called as reciprocal distance matrix [10]) of a graph 𝐺𝐺 is an 𝑛𝑛×𝑛𝑛 matrix (𝐺𝐺) = [𝑟𝑟𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖] , in which

𝑟𝑟𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖 =�

1

𝑑𝑑𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖, 𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖 ≠ 𝑖𝑖

0, 𝑜𝑜𝑡𝑡ℎ𝑒𝑒𝑟𝑟𝑒𝑒𝑖𝑖𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒

where 𝑑𝑑𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖 is the distance between 𝑣𝑣𝑖𝑖 and 𝑣𝑣𝑖𝑖. The Harary matrix of a graph was introduced by Ivanciuc et al. [9] which has importance in the study of molecules in QSPR (Quantitative Structure Property Relationship) models [9]. The characteristic polynomial of 𝑅𝑅𝑅𝑅(𝐺𝐺)is defined as 𝜓𝜓(𝐺𝐺 ∶ 𝜇𝜇) = det�𝜇𝜇𝜇𝜇 − 𝑅𝑅𝑅𝑅(𝐺𝐺)�, where 𝜇𝜇 is the identity matrix of order 𝑛𝑛. The eigenvalues of the Harary matrix 𝑅𝑅𝑅𝑅(𝐺𝐺), denoted by 𝜇𝜇1,𝜇𝜇2, … ,𝜇𝜇𝑛𝑛 are said to be the Harary eigenvalues or 𝐻𝐻-eigenvalues of 𝐺𝐺 and their collection is called the Harary spectrum or 𝐻𝐻-spectrum of 𝐺𝐺.

Since the Harary matrix of 𝐺𝐺 is symmetric, its eigenvalues are real and can be ordered as 𝜇𝜇1≥ 𝜇𝜇2≥ …≥ 𝜇𝜇𝑛𝑛. Two non-isomorphic graphs are said to be Harary cospectral or 𝐻𝐻-cospectral if they have same 𝐻𝐻-eigenvalues. The results on 𝐻𝐻-eigenvalues of a graph are obtained in [2, 4, 5, 8, 13].

The Harary energy or 𝐻𝐻-energy of a graph 𝐺𝐺, denoted by 𝐻𝐻𝐻𝐻(𝐺𝐺), is defined as [6] 𝐻𝐻𝐻𝐻(𝐺𝐺) =∑𝑛𝑛 |𝜇𝜇𝑖𝑖|

𝑖𝑖=1 . (1)

The Eq. (1) is defined in full analogy to the ordinary graph energy [7] defined as the sum of the absolute values of the eigenvalues of the adjacency matrix of 𝐺𝐺. Details about the graph energy can be found in [11].

The graphs 𝐺𝐺1 and 𝐺𝐺2are said to be Harary equienergetic or 𝐻𝐻-equienergetic if 𝐻𝐻𝐻𝐻(𝐺𝐺1) =𝐻𝐻𝐻𝐻(𝐺𝐺2). For obvious reason, 𝐻𝐻-cospectral graphs are 𝐻𝐻-equienergetic. Therefore it is interesting to obtain non 𝐻𝐻-cospectral graphs on same number of vertices having equal 𝐻𝐻-energy. In [12] the 𝐻𝐻-energy of line graphs of certain regular graphs was obtained and thus obtained the pairs of 𝐻𝐻-equienergetic graphs.

Corresponding Author: Vinayak V. Manjalapur*

2

(2)

In this paper we obtain the characteristic polynomial of the Harary matrix of the join of two regular graphs whose diameter is less than or equal to two and thereby construct pairs of non 𝐻𝐻-cospectral, 𝐻𝐻-equienergetic graphs on 𝑛𝑛 vertices for all 𝑛𝑛 ≥6.

2. H-SPECTRA AND H-ENERGY OF JOIN OF GRAPHS

Definition: The join of two graphs 𝐺𝐺1 and 𝐺𝐺2, denoted by 𝐺𝐺1∇𝐺𝐺2, is a graph obtained from 𝐺𝐺1 and 𝐺𝐺2 by joining each

vertex of 𝐺𝐺1 to all vertices of 𝐺𝐺2.

𝐺𝐺1 𝐺𝐺2 𝐺𝐺1∇𝐺𝐺2

Theorem 2.1: Let 𝐺𝐺𝑖𝑖 be an 𝑟𝑟𝑖𝑖- regular graph on 𝑛𝑛𝑖𝑖 vertices and diam(𝐺𝐺𝑖𝑖) ≤ 2, 𝑖𝑖 = 1, 2. Then the characteristic

polynomial of the Harary matrix of 𝐺𝐺1∇𝐺𝐺2is

𝜓𝜓(𝐺𝐺1∇𝐺𝐺2∶ 𝜇𝜇) =[(𝜇𝜇 − 𝑋𝑋(𝜇𝜇 − 𝑋𝑋)(𝜇𝜇 − 𝑌𝑌)(𝜇𝜇 − 𝑌𝑌)− 𝑛𝑛)1𝑛𝑛2] 𝜓𝜓(𝐺𝐺1∶ 𝜇𝜇)𝜓𝜓(𝐺𝐺2∶ 𝜇𝜇), (2)

where 𝑋𝑋=𝑛𝑛1+𝑟𝑟1−1

2 𝑑𝑑𝑛𝑛𝑑𝑑 𝑌𝑌=

𝑛𝑛2+𝑟𝑟2−1

2 .

Proof: 𝜓𝜓(𝐺𝐺1∇𝐺𝐺2∶ 𝜇𝜇) = det�𝜇𝜇𝜇𝜇 − 𝑅𝑅𝑅𝑅(𝐺𝐺1∇𝐺𝐺2)�

= �𝜇𝜇𝜇𝜇𝑛𝑛1− 𝑅𝑅𝑅𝑅(𝐺𝐺1) −𝐽𝐽𝑛𝑛1×𝑛𝑛2 −𝐽𝐽𝑛𝑛2×𝑛𝑛1 𝜇𝜇𝜇𝜇𝑛𝑛2− 𝑅𝑅𝑅𝑅(𝐺𝐺2)�

(3)

where 𝐽𝐽 is the matrix whose all entries are equal to unity. The determinant (3) can be written as

𝜇𝜇 −𝑟𝑟12 … −𝑟𝑟1𝑛𝑛1 −1 1 … −1 −𝑟𝑟21 𝜇𝜇 … −𝑟𝑟2𝑛𝑛1 −1 1 … −1

⋮ ⋮ ⋮

−𝑟𝑟𝑛𝑛11 −𝑟𝑟𝑛𝑛12 … 𝜇𝜇 −1 1 … −1

−1 1 … −1 𝜇𝜇 −𝑟𝑟′

12 … −𝑟𝑟′1𝑛𝑛2

−1 1 … −1 −𝑟𝑟′

21 𝜇𝜇 … −𝑟𝑟′2𝑛𝑛2

⋮ ⋮ ⋮

−1 1 … −1 −𝑟𝑟′

𝑛𝑛21 −𝑟𝑟′𝑛𝑛22 … 𝜇𝜇

in which 𝑟𝑟𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖 = 1

𝑑𝑑𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖, where 𝑑𝑑𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖 is the distance between the vertices 𝑣𝑣𝑖𝑖 and 𝑣𝑣𝑖𝑖 in 𝐺𝐺1 and 𝑟𝑟 ′

𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖 =𝑑𝑑1′ 𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖, where 𝑑𝑑′𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖 is the distance between the vertices 𝑢𝑢𝑖𝑖 and 𝑢𝑢𝑖𝑖 in 𝐺𝐺2. Since 𝐺𝐺𝑖𝑖 is an 𝑟𝑟𝑖𝑖 -regular graph and 𝑑𝑑𝑖𝑖𝑑𝑑𝑑𝑑(𝐺𝐺𝑖𝑖) ≤ 2, every vertex of 𝐺𝐺𝑖𝑖is at distance one from 𝑟𝑟𝑖𝑖 vertices and at distance 2 from remaining (𝑛𝑛𝑖𝑖 − 1 − 𝑟𝑟𝑖𝑖 ) vertices, 𝑖𝑖 = 1, 2. Therefore

� 𝑟𝑟𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖 =

𝑛𝑛1

𝑖𝑖=1

𝑛𝑛1+𝑟𝑟1−1

2 𝑖𝑖𝑜𝑜𝑟𝑟𝑖𝑖= 1, 2, … . ,𝑛𝑛1 (5)

and

� 𝑟𝑟′ 𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖 = 𝑛𝑛2

𝑖𝑖=1

𝑛𝑛2+𝑟𝑟2−1

2 𝑖𝑖𝑜𝑜𝑟𝑟𝑖𝑖= 1, 2, … . ,𝑛𝑛2 (6)

Performing following operations in the sequence on the determinant (4) we get (7). (i) Subtract the row (𝑛𝑛1 + 1) from the rows (𝑛𝑛1 + 2),(𝑛𝑛1 + 3), . . . , (𝑛𝑛1 +𝑛𝑛2 ).

(ii) Add the columns (𝑛𝑛1 + 2),(𝑛𝑛1 + 3), . . . , (𝑛𝑛1 +𝑛𝑛2 ) to the column (𝑛𝑛1 + 1) and |𝐵𝐵|. apply Eq. (6), where 𝑌𝑌=𝑛𝑛2+𝑟𝑟2−1

(3)

𝜇𝜇 −𝑟𝑟12 … −𝑟𝑟1𝑛𝑛1 −𝑛𝑛2 −𝑟𝑟21 𝜇𝜇 … −𝑟𝑟2𝑛𝑛1 −𝑛𝑛2

⋮ ⋮

−𝑟𝑟𝑛𝑛11 −𝑟𝑟𝑛𝑛12 … 𝜇𝜇 −𝑛𝑛2

−1 −1 … −1 𝜇𝜇 − 𝑌𝑌 where

𝜇𝜇+𝑟𝑟′

12 −𝑟𝑟′23+𝑟𝑟′13 … −𝑟𝑟′2𝑛𝑛2+𝑟𝑟′1𝑛𝑛2

−𝑟𝑟′

32+𝑟𝑟′12 𝜇𝜇+𝑟𝑟′13 −𝑟𝑟′3𝑛𝑛2+𝑟𝑟′1𝑛𝑛2

⋮ ⋮

−𝑟𝑟′

𝑛𝑛22+𝑟𝑟′12 −𝑟𝑟′𝑛𝑛23+𝑟𝑟′13 … 𝜇𝜇+𝑟𝑟′1𝑛𝑛2

The first determinant in (7) is of order (𝑛𝑛1 + 1).

Performing following operations in the sequence on the first determinant of (7) we get (9). (i) Subtract the first row from the rows 2, 3, … ,𝑛𝑛1.

(ii) Add columns 2, 3, … ,𝑛𝑛1 to the first column of and apply Eq. (5), where 𝑋𝑋=𝑛𝑛1+𝑟𝑟1−1

2 :

𝜇𝜇 − 𝑋𝑋 −𝑟𝑟12 … −𝑟𝑟1𝑛𝑛1 −𝑛𝑛2

0 𝜇𝜇+𝑟𝑟12 … −𝑟𝑟2𝑛𝑛1+𝑟𝑟1𝑛𝑛1 0

⋮ ⋮

0 −𝑟𝑟𝑛𝑛12+𝑟𝑟12 … 𝜇𝜇+𝑟𝑟1𝑛𝑛1 0

−𝑛𝑛1 −1 … −1 𝜇𝜇 − 𝑌𝑌

Expand it along the first column to obtain(10):

{(𝜇𝜇 − 𝑋𝑋)∆1−(−1)𝑛𝑛1𝑛𝑛1∆2} |𝐵𝐵| (10)

where

𝜇𝜇+𝑟𝑟12 −𝑟𝑟23+𝑟𝑟13 … −𝑟𝑟2𝑛𝑛1+𝑟𝑟1𝑛𝑛1 0 −𝑟𝑟32+𝑟𝑟12 𝜇𝜇+𝑟𝑟

13 −𝑟𝑟3𝑛𝑛1+𝑟𝑟1𝑛𝑛1 0

⋮ ⋮

−𝑟𝑟𝑛𝑛12+𝑟𝑟12 −𝑟𝑟𝑛𝑛13+𝑟𝑟13 … 𝜇𝜇+𝑟𝑟1𝑛𝑛1 0

-1 -1 -1 𝜇𝜇 − 𝑌𝑌

and

−𝑟𝑟12 −𝑟𝑟13 … −𝑟𝑟1𝑛𝑛1 −𝑛𝑛2 𝜇𝜇+𝑟𝑟12 −𝑟𝑟23+𝑟𝑟13 … −𝑟𝑟2𝑛𝑛1+𝑟𝑟1𝑛𝑛1 0 −𝑟𝑟32+𝑟𝑟12 𝜇𝜇+𝑟𝑟13 −𝑟𝑟3𝑛𝑛1+𝑟𝑟1𝑛𝑛1 0

⋮ ⋮

−𝑟𝑟𝑛𝑛12+𝑟𝑟12 −𝑟𝑟𝑛𝑛13+𝑟𝑟13 … 𝜇𝜇+𝑟𝑟1𝑛𝑛1 0

The expression (10) can be written as

{(𝜇𝜇 − 𝑋𝑋)(𝜇𝜇 − 𝑌𝑌)|𝐴𝐴|−(−1)𝑛𝑛1𝑛𝑛

1(−1)𝑛𝑛1+1(−𝑛𝑛2)|𝐴𝐴|} |𝐵𝐵| = {(𝜇𝜇 − 𝑋𝑋)(𝜇𝜇 − 𝑌𝑌)− 𝑛𝑛1𝑛𝑛2}|𝐴𝐴||𝐵𝐵| (11)

(8)

|𝐵𝐵|. (9)

1

=

2

=

(4)

Where,

𝜇𝜇+𝑟𝑟12 −𝑟𝑟23+𝑟𝑟13 … −𝑟𝑟2𝑛𝑛1+𝑟𝑟1𝑛𝑛1 −𝑟𝑟32+𝑟𝑟12 𝜇𝜇+𝑟𝑟13 −𝑟𝑟3𝑛𝑛1+𝑟𝑟1𝑛𝑛1

⋮ ⋮

−𝑟𝑟𝑛𝑛12+𝑟𝑟12 −𝑟𝑟𝑛𝑛13+𝑟𝑟13 … 𝜇𝜇+𝑟𝑟1𝑛𝑛1

The determinant (12) can be written as

𝜇𝜇 − 𝑋𝑋 −𝑟𝑟12 −𝑟𝑟13 … −𝑟𝑟1𝑛𝑛1 0 𝜇𝜇+𝑟𝑟12 −𝑟𝑟23+𝑟𝑟13 … −𝑟𝑟2𝑛𝑛1+𝑟𝑟1𝑛𝑛1

0 −𝑟𝑟32+𝑟𝑟12 𝜇𝜇+𝑟𝑟13 −𝑟𝑟3𝑛𝑛1+𝑟𝑟1𝑛𝑛1

⋮ ⋮ ⋮

0 −𝑟𝑟𝑛𝑛12+𝑟𝑟12 −𝑟𝑟𝑛𝑛13+𝑟𝑟13 𝜇𝜇+𝑟𝑟1𝑛𝑛1

From Eq. (5) the sum of the 𝑖𝑖-th row in (13) is 𝜇𝜇+𝑟𝑟𝑖𝑖1 for 𝑖𝑖= 2,3, … ,𝑛𝑛1.

Therefore, by subtracting the columns 2,3, … ,𝑛𝑛1 of (13) from the first column, we obtain (14):

𝜇𝜇 −𝑟𝑟12 −𝑟𝑟13 … −𝑟𝑟1𝑛𝑛1

−𝜇𝜇 − 𝑟𝑟21 𝜇𝜇+𝑟𝑟12 −𝑟𝑟23+𝑟𝑟13 … −𝑟𝑟2𝑛𝑛1+𝑟𝑟1𝑛𝑛1

−𝜇𝜇 − 𝑟𝑟31 −𝑟𝑟32+𝑟𝑟12 𝜇𝜇+𝑟𝑟13 −𝑟𝑟3𝑛𝑛1+𝑟𝑟1𝑛𝑛1

⋮ ⋮ ⋮

−𝜇𝜇 − 𝑟𝑟𝑛𝑛11 −𝑟𝑟𝑛𝑛12+𝑟𝑟12 −𝑟𝑟𝑛𝑛13+𝑟𝑟13 … 𝜇𝜇+𝑟𝑟1𝑛𝑛1

Add the first row of (14) to the rows 2, 3, … .𝑛𝑛1 to obtain (15):

)

(

1

|

|

X

A

=

µ

ψ

(

G

1

: )

µ

. (15)

In a similar manner we can show that from (8),

1

|

|

(

)

B

Y

µ

=

ψ

(

G

2

:

µ

)

(16)

Substituting (15) and (16) back into (11) gives Eq. (2).

Theorem 2.2:Let 𝐺𝐺𝑖𝑖 be an 𝑟𝑟𝑖𝑖- regular graph on 𝑛𝑛𝑖𝑖 vertices and diam(𝐺𝐺𝑖𝑖)≤ 2, 𝑖𝑖 = 1, 2. Then

𝐻𝐻𝐻𝐻(𝐺𝐺1∇𝐺𝐺2) =𝐻𝐻𝐻𝐻(𝐺𝐺1) +𝐻𝐻𝐻𝐻(𝐺𝐺2)−(𝑋𝑋+𝑌𝑌) +�(𝑋𝑋 − 𝑌𝑌)2+ 4𝑛𝑛1𝑛𝑛2 ,

where 𝑋𝑋=𝑛𝑛1+𝑟𝑟1−1

2 𝑑𝑑𝑛𝑛𝑑𝑑 𝑌𝑌=

𝑛𝑛2+𝑟𝑟2−1

2 .

Proof: From Theorem 2.1,

𝜓𝜓(𝐺𝐺1∇𝐺𝐺2∶ 𝜇𝜇) =[(𝜇𝜇 − 𝑋𝑋(𝜇𝜇 − 𝑋𝑋)(𝜇𝜇 − 𝑌𝑌)(𝜇𝜇 − 𝑌𝑌)− 𝑛𝑛)1𝑛𝑛2] 𝜓𝜓(𝐺𝐺1∶ 𝜇𝜇)𝜓𝜓(𝐺𝐺2∶ 𝜇𝜇), which gives that

(𝜇𝜇 − 𝑋𝑋)(𝜇𝜇 − 𝑌𝑌)𝜓𝜓(𝐺𝐺1∇𝐺𝐺2∶ 𝜇𝜇) =[(𝜇𝜇 − 𝑋𝑋)(𝜇𝜇 − 𝑌𝑌)− 𝑛𝑛1𝑛𝑛2]𝜓𝜓(𝐺𝐺1∶ 𝜇𝜇)𝜓𝜓(𝐺𝐺2∶ 𝜇𝜇).

𝜇𝜇 −𝑟𝑟12 −𝑟𝑟13 … −𝑟𝑟1𝑛𝑛1

−𝑟𝑟21 𝜇𝜇 −𝑟𝑟23 … −𝑟𝑟2𝑛𝑛1

−𝑟𝑟31 −𝑟𝑟32 𝜇𝜇 −𝑟𝑟3𝑛𝑛1

⋮ ⋮ ⋮

−𝑟𝑟𝑛𝑛11 −𝑟𝑟𝑛𝑛12 −𝑟𝑟𝑛𝑛13 … 𝜇𝜇

|𝐴𝐴| =

(12)

|𝐴𝐴| =

(𝜇𝜇 − 𝑋𝑋)

1

(13)

|𝐴𝐴| =

(𝜇𝜇 − 𝑋𝑋)

1

(14)

(5)

Let 𝑃𝑃1(𝜇𝜇) = (𝜇𝜇 − 𝑋𝑋)(𝜇𝜇 − 𝑌𝑌)𝜓𝜓(𝐺𝐺1∇𝐺𝐺2∶ 𝜇𝜇)

and 𝑃𝑃2(𝜇𝜇) =[(𝜇𝜇 − 𝑋𝑋)(𝜇𝜇 − 𝑌𝑌)− 𝑛𝑛1𝑛𝑛2]𝜓𝜓(𝐺𝐺1∶ 𝜇𝜇)𝜓𝜓(𝐺𝐺2∶ 𝜇𝜇).

The roots of 𝑃𝑃1(𝜇𝜇) = 0 are 𝑋𝑋,𝑌𝑌 and the 𝐻𝐻-eigenvalues of 𝐺𝐺1∇𝐺𝐺2.

Therefore the sum of the absolute values of the roots of 𝑃𝑃1(𝜇𝜇) = 0 is

𝑋𝑋+𝑌𝑌+𝐻𝐻𝐻𝐻(𝐺𝐺1∇𝐺𝐺2). (17)

The roots of 𝑃𝑃2(𝜇𝜇) = 0 are 𝐻𝐻-eigenvalues of 𝐺𝐺1 and 𝐺𝐺2 and

1

2�(𝑋𝑋+𝑌𝑌) ±�(𝑋𝑋+𝑌𝑌)2−4(𝑋𝑋𝑌𝑌 − 𝑛𝑛1𝑛𝑛2)�.

Therefore the sum of the absolute values of the roots of 𝑃𝑃2(𝜇𝜇) = 0 is

𝐻𝐻𝐻𝐻(𝐺𝐺1) +𝐻𝐻𝐻𝐻(𝐺𝐺2) +�12�(𝑋𝑋+𝑌𝑌) +�(𝑋𝑋+𝑌𝑌)2−4(𝑋𝑋𝑌𝑌 − 𝑛𝑛1𝑛𝑛2)��+�12�(𝑋𝑋+𝑌𝑌)− �(𝑋𝑋+𝑌𝑌)2−4(𝑋𝑋𝑌𝑌 − 𝑛𝑛1𝑛𝑛2)��. (18) Since𝑃𝑃1(𝜇𝜇) =𝑃𝑃2(𝜇𝜇), equating (17) and (18), we get

𝐻𝐻𝐻𝐻(𝐺𝐺1∇𝐺𝐺2) =𝐻𝐻𝐻𝐻(𝐺𝐺1) +𝐻𝐻𝐻𝐻(𝐺𝐺2)−(𝑋𝑋+𝑌𝑌) + �12�(𝑋𝑋+𝑌𝑌) +�(𝑋𝑋+𝑌𝑌)2−4(𝑋𝑋𝑌𝑌 − 𝑛𝑛1𝑛𝑛2)��

+ �1

2�(𝑋𝑋+𝑌𝑌)− �(𝑋𝑋+𝑌𝑌)2−4(𝑋𝑋𝑌𝑌 − 𝑛𝑛1𝑛𝑛2)��. (19)

Since 𝑟𝑟1≤ 𝑛𝑛1−1 and 𝑟𝑟2≤ 𝑛𝑛2−1,

𝑋𝑋𝑌𝑌=�𝑛𝑛1+2𝑟𝑟1−1� �𝑛𝑛2+2𝑟𝑟2−1� ≤ �2𝑛𝑛12−2� �2𝑛𝑛22−2�<𝑛𝑛1𝑛𝑛2 .

Therefore Eq. (19) reduces to

𝐻𝐻𝐻𝐻(𝐺𝐺1∇𝐺𝐺2) =𝐻𝐻𝐻𝐻(𝐺𝐺1) +𝐻𝐻𝐻𝐻(𝐺𝐺2)−(𝑋𝑋+𝑌𝑌) +�(𝑋𝑋+𝑌𝑌)2−4(𝑋𝑋𝑌𝑌 − 𝑛𝑛1𝑛𝑛2)

=𝐻𝐻𝐻𝐻(𝐺𝐺1) +𝐻𝐻𝐻𝐻(𝐺𝐺2)−(𝑋𝑋+𝑌𝑌) +�(𝑋𝑋 − 𝑌𝑌)2+ 4𝑛𝑛1𝑛𝑛2.

Corollary 2.3: If 𝐹𝐹1and 𝐹𝐹2are non 𝐻𝐻-cospectral, 𝐻𝐻-equienergetic regular graphs on n vertices and of same degree

and 𝑑𝑑𝑖𝑖𝑑𝑑𝑑𝑑(𝐹𝐹𝑖𝑖 ) ≤ 2, 𝑖𝑖 = 1, 2, then for any regular graph 𝐺𝐺 with 𝑑𝑑𝑖𝑖𝑑𝑑𝑑𝑑(𝐺𝐺)≤2, 𝐻𝐻𝐻𝐻(𝐹𝐹1∇𝐺𝐺) = 𝐻𝐻𝐻𝐻(𝐹𝐹2∇𝐺𝐺).

3. CONSTRUCTION OF 𝑯𝑯- EQUIENERGETIC GRAPHS

Theorem 3.1: There exist a pair of non 𝐻𝐻-cospectral, 𝐻𝐻-equienergetic graphs on 𝑛𝑛 vertices for all 𝑛𝑛 ≥6.

Proof: Consider the graphs𝐹𝐹𝑑𝑑and𝐹𝐹𝑏𝑏 as shown in Fig. 2.

𝐹𝐹𝑑𝑑 𝐹𝐹𝑏𝑏

Fig. 2

By direct computation,

𝜓𝜓(𝐹𝐹𝑑𝑑∶ 𝜇𝜇) =�(𝜇𝜇 −4)(𝜇𝜇+ 2)�𝜇𝜇+12

4

� (20) And

𝜓𝜓(𝐹𝐹𝑏𝑏∶ 𝜇𝜇) =�𝜇𝜇(𝜇𝜇 −4)�𝜇𝜇+21�2�𝜇𝜇+32�2� (21)

Both 𝐹𝐹𝑑𝑑 and 𝐹𝐹𝑏𝑏 are regular graphs on 6 vertices and of degree 3. Also 𝑑𝑑𝑖𝑖𝑑𝑑𝑑𝑑(𝐹𝐹𝑖𝑖)≤2, 𝑖𝑖=𝑑𝑑,𝑏𝑏, and 𝐻𝐻𝐻𝐻(𝐹𝐹𝑑𝑑) =𝐻𝐻𝐻𝐻( 𝐹𝐹𝑏𝑏) = 8.

Let 𝐹𝐹 be any 𝑟𝑟-regular graph on𝑝𝑝 ≥ 1 vertices and 𝑑𝑑𝑖𝑖𝑑𝑑𝑑𝑑(𝐹𝐹)≤2. Then by Theorem 2.2,

𝐻𝐻𝐻𝐻(𝐹𝐹𝑑𝑑∇𝐹𝐹) =𝐻𝐻𝐻𝐻(𝐹𝐹𝑏𝑏∇𝐹𝐹) =𝐻𝐻𝐻𝐻(𝐹𝐹) +�9− 𝑝𝑝 − 𝑟𝑟2 �+��9− 𝑝𝑝 − 𝑟𝑟2

2

(6)

Thus, 𝐹𝐹𝑑𝑑∇𝐹𝐹 and 𝐹𝐹𝑏𝑏∇𝐹𝐹 are 𝐻𝐻-equienergetic graphs. By Eqs. (20) and (21), 𝐹𝐹𝑑𝑑 and 𝐹𝐹𝑏𝑏 are non 𝐻𝐻-cospectral, so from Theorem 2.1, 𝐹𝐹𝑑𝑑∇𝐹𝐹 and 𝐹𝐹𝑏𝑏∇𝐹𝐹 are also non 𝐻𝐻-cospectral. Further 𝐹𝐹𝑑𝑑∇𝐹𝐹 and 𝐹𝐹𝑏𝑏∇𝐹𝐹 possesses equal number of vertices n = 6 + p, p = 1, 2, ….

That the theorem holds also for 𝑛𝑛= 6 is directly verified from Eqs. (20) and (21).

Let 𝐾𝐾𝑝𝑝 be the complete graph on 𝑝𝑝 vertices. It is regular graph of degree 𝑝𝑝 −1. The reciprocal distance matrix of 𝐾𝐾𝑝𝑝 is same as its adjacency matrix. Therefore 𝐻𝐻𝐻𝐻(𝐾𝐾𝑝𝑝) = (𝑝𝑝 −1) [3]. Using this in Theorem 2.2 we have following result.

Corollary 3.2: If 𝐹𝐹𝑑𝑑 and 𝐹𝐹𝑏𝑏 are the graphs as shown in Fig. 2, then

𝐻𝐻𝐻𝐻�𝐹𝐹𝑑𝑑∇𝐾𝐾𝑝𝑝�=𝐻𝐻𝐻𝐻�𝐹𝐹𝑏𝑏∇𝐾𝐾𝑝𝑝�=𝑝𝑝+ 3 +�𝑝𝑝2+ 14𝑝𝑝+ 25.

4. CONCLUSION

From Corollary 2.3 it is easy to construct a pair of non 𝐻𝐻-cospectral, 𝐻𝐻-equienergetic graphs. In particular from Theorem 3.1 and Corollary 3.2, it is easy to construct a pair of non 𝐻𝐻-cospectral, 𝐻𝐻-equienergetic 𝑛𝑛-vertex graphs for all 𝑛𝑛 ≥6.

ACKNOWLEDGMENT

This work is supported by the University Grants Commission (UGC), Govt. of India through research grant under UPE FAR-II grant No. F 14-3/2012 (NS/PE).

REFERENCES

1. F. Buckley, F. Harary, Distance in Graphs, Addison–Wesley, Redwood, 1990.

2. Z. Cui, B. Liu, On Harary matrix, Harary index and Harary energy, MATCH Commun. Math. Comput. Chem., 68 (2012), 815 – 823.

3. D. M. Cvetkovi, M. Doob, H. Sachs, Spectra of Graphs – Theory and Application Academic Press, New York, 1980.

4. K. C. Das, Maximum eigenvalues of the reciprocal distance matrix, J. Math. Chem., 47 (2010), 21 – 28. 5. M. V. Diudea, O. Ivanciuc, S. Nikolic, N. Trinajstic, Matrices of reciprocal distance, polynomials and derived

numbers, MATCH Commun. Math. Comput. Chem., 35 (1997), 41 – 64.

6. A. D. Gungor, A. S. Cevik, Onthe Harary energy and Harary Estrada index of a graph, MATCH Commun. Math. Comput. Chem., 64 (2010), 280 – 296.

7. I. Gutman, The energy of a graph, Ber. Math. Stat. Sekt. Forschungsz. Graz, 103 (1978), 1 – 22.

8. F. Huang, X. Li, S. Wang, On graphs with maximum Harary spectral radius, arXiv: 1411.6832v1 [math.CO] 25 Nov 2014.

9. O. Ivanciuc, T. S. Balaban, A. T. Balaban, Design of topological indices. Part 4. Reciprocal distance matrix, related local vertex invariants and topological indices, J. Math. Chem., 12 (1993), 309 - 318.

10. D. Jenezic, A. Milicevic, S. Nikolic, N. Trinajstic, Graph Theoretical Matrices in Chemistry, Uni. Kragujevac, Kragujevac, 2007.

11. X. Li, Y. Shi, I. Gutman, Graph Energy, Springer, New York, 2012.

12. H. S. Ramane, R. B. Jummannaver, Harary spectra and Harary energy of line graphs of regular graphs, Gulf J. Math. (in press).

13. B. Zhou, N. Trinajstic, Maximum eigenvalues of the reciprocal distance matrix and the reverse Wiener matrix, Int. J. Quantum Chem., 108 (2008), 858 – 864.

Source of support: Grants Commission (UGC), Govt. of India, Conflict of interest: None Declared

References

Related documents

The National School of Government will be an important enabler to the implementation of human resource development/training policy in the Public Service through the provision

Keywords and phrases Randomized query complexity, decision tree complexity, composition theorem, partition bound, lifting theorem.. Digital Object

Wang, “A dual-polarized pattern reconfigurable yagi patch antenna for microbase stations,” IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, vol. Ka- marudin,

In OF1.0, packet forwarding within an OpenFlow logical switch is controlled by a single flow table that contains a set of flow entries installed by the controller.. The flow

same method used in the proof of Theorem 3.1 and the second face of the Hausdorff–Young inequality, we obtain (for a different range) the following upper estimate of the measure

Comparison of inequality across cities and over time Table 2 compares inequalities in child mortality rates across cities and over time using four measures of in- equality:

Latent class analysis aims to fit a probabilistic model to data containing observable variables such as asthma symptoms (e.g. wheeze and/or cough) or atopic sensitization (e.g.

Biological control is the use of living organisms, such as predators, parasitoids, and pathogens, to control pest insects, weeds, or diseases.. Other items addressed