IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN AND FOR KENT COUNTY
Full text
Related documents
The employer next contends that the Board committed legal error by not engaging in a successive carrier analysis to decide whether the 2002 injury was simply a recurrence of the
Metzger, 6 which also denied a plaintiff’s request to have medical records of other patients in a medical malpractice case, by arguing that the discovery of other patients’
It appears to this Court, with the exception of some of the massage therapy visits, that the treatment sought by Mrs. Smith was reasonable and necessary. Throughout her treatment,
When establishing his right to payment under section 2118, a plaintiff must prove that the expenses he incurred were causally related to the accident involving the insured vehicle 11
On April 6, 2015, GEICO filed its second motion for summary judgment to dismiss claims brought by Plaintiff. GEICO asserts that this Court need not interpret any choice of law
Further, Warren-Wolfe alleges that the Plaintiffs did not see the report prior to purchasing the home, nor did they rely on its contents, and thus there is no legal basis
Framed under Superior Court Civil Rule 12(b)(6), Defendant claims Plaintiff has failed to state a claim for which relief can be granted. Support for Defendant’s argument, however,
State said, “I think you should stay.” Defendant says that after the officer showed him the officer’s police credentials, the officer asked for and received Defendant’s