• No results found

BUDGET PRESENTATION. The Finance Department is proud to publish and disseminate budget information to the Board of Trustees and to our community.

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "BUDGET PRESENTATION. The Finance Department is proud to publish and disseminate budget information to the Board of Trustees and to our community."

Copied!
8
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

New Deal Independent School District

401 South Auburn Avenue

Post Office Box 280 New Deal, Texas 79350-0280 Steven L. Jerden, CPA, CGMA

Chief Financial Officer

August 11, 2015

The Honorable Board of Trustees New Deal Independent School District P O Box 280

401 South Auburn Avenue New Deal TX 79350-0280

Members of the Board of Trustees:

The proposed budget for the fiscal year ending August 31, 2016 for the New Deal Independent School District is attached. The proposed budget is composed of five sections: executive summary, fact sheet, conflict of interest, proposed revenues, and proposed expenditures. The District’s Chief Financial Officer assumes full responsibility for data accuracy and completeness. This budget presents the District’s finance and operations plan, and all necessary disclosures. Administration is confident that the proposed budget will continue to provide funding in a dynamic and progressive manner to allow the District’s schools to maintain their high level of performance as in previous years.

BUDGET PRESENTATION

The development, review and consideration of the proposed General Fund and Special Revenue Fund Budgets were completed with a detailed review of every revenue and expenditure item within the context of the District’s mission and goals and the budget and operating policies. Information on each of the fund budgets is provided in this budget document.

The Finance Department is proud to publish and disseminate budget information to the Board of Trustees and to our community.

The proposed budget, the year-end Comprehensive Annual Financial Report, and the Financial Integrity Rating System of Texas are the primary vehicles to present the financial plan and the results of operations of the District. Additionally, the Texas Education Agency (TEA) maintains students, staffs and financial results pertaining to New Deal and the other approximately 1,010 School Districts within the State of Texas in the Public Education Information Management System database for inquiry.

(2)

CURRICULUM AND INSTRUCTION GOALS

Based on the mission and design principles of the District, the Board of Trustees adopts curriculum and instruction goals to promote efforts to improve the quality of learning and teaching in the schools. The human and financial resources are subsequently allocated in the budget to achieve the mission and goals of the District. Therefore, the budget reflects the allocation of revenues and expenditures to support educational programs and services defined by the District’s mission and goals articulated through financial and operating policies. It is a delicate balance of policy choices. Additionally, it also represents a delicate balance between the educational needs of students and the ability of the community to provide the necessary financial support.

BUDGET PROCESS AND SIGNIFICANT CHANGES

The budget process is comprised of five phases that include planning, preparation, adoption, implementation and evaluation. The preparation of the budget commenced in March, with the development of the forecast of student enrollment for the 2015-16 school year. The forecast of student enrollment provides the assumption on which allocations for building the budgets are formulated and staff resources are determined. Based on student enrollment of approximately 775 students, the development of employee salaries and benefits has been projected at approximately 64.7% of the total proposed budget.

Budget and staffing allocations are based on Board of Trustee policy that has not been changed from prior years. Additionally, the Board of Trustees has not instituted changes in the delivery of the educational programs and services that have materially affected the financial or operating policies of the District.

The following schedule presents comparisons of proposed expenditures for the General Fund and Special Revenue Funds with the original budgets for the current year:

Budget

Initial 2015-16 %

Fund 2014-15 Proposed Change General Fund $7,128,674 $7,147,925 0.25%

Special Revenue Funds 631,326 612,075 -0.25%

Internal Service Fund 40,000 40,000 0.00%

(3)

ANALYSIS OF PROPOSED BUDGETS

Dissemination of information to students is labor intensive. This fact is reflected in the allocation of the financial resources of the District. As noted above, payroll costs (salaries and benefits) are projected to consume approximately 64.7% of total expenditures in the General Fund and Special Revenue Funds.

Counselor, nurse, librarian, and teacher salaries are based on experience and state minimum salary schedules published annually by TEA. All other salaries have been computed based on staffing decisions of the Board.

Fiscal year 2015-16 proposed budget supports a total of 93.5 full-time equivalent (FTE) positions, as detailed below:

 Full-Time 92

 Part-Time 3

The District is fully staffed and no open positions have been budgeted for fiscal year 2015-16.

Budgeted full-time and part-time positions can be classified as follows:

 Teacher/Counselor/Nurse/Librarian - 64 Full - 1 Part  Classroom Support - 12 Full - 1 Part

 Campus Administration - 2 Full

 Campus Support - 3 Full

 Foodservice - 5 Full

 General Administration - 4 Full - 1 Part

 Maintenance - 2 Full

Combined years of experience for the 64.5 full-time employees classified as a teacher, counselor, nurse, and librarian totals 818 years. This results in an average of approximately 12.7 years experience.

Budgeted changes for new hire and absorbed positions for fiscal year 2015-16 are as follows:

 Two Teaching Assistants (Full-Time) - New for FY 2015-16  One Teacher/Coach Staff (Part-Time) - New for FY 2015-16 Proposed payroll costs for fiscal year 2014-15 total $5,051,227, which is a increase of 0.34% or $25,435 from last year’s total of $5,025,792. As stated above, payroll costs represent 64.7% of the total $7,800,000 proposed budget. Salaries are projected to consume 87.4% of total payroll costs or $4,417,144.

(4)

Projected benefits and their associated costs are detailed below:

 Texas Teacher Retirement System $ 368,217

 Group Health $ 194,403

 Medicare/FIMM $ 58,967

 Social Security/FICA $ 6,262

 Unemployment Compensation $ 6,234

Presented below is a summary schedule of operating expenditures by object: Budget

Initial 2015-16 %

Fund 2014-15 Proposed Change

Payroll Costs $5,025,792 $5,051,227 0.33%

Professional Services 1,236,574 1,221,666 -0.19%

Supplies and Materials 780,755 757,248 -0.30%

Other Operating Costs 486,275 499,267 0.16%

Debt Service 190,604 190,592 0.00%

Capital Outlay 80,000 80,000 0.00%

Total $7,800,000 $7,800,000 0.00%

Overall, payroll costs increased $25,435 or .33%. The .33% increase in payroll costs is primarily due to:

 Net salary turnover decreased payroll costs by $59,580; however,  This decrease was partially offset by the following:

o State mandated step increases increased payroll costs by $65,216; o merit pay raises increased payroll costs by $20,897; and,

o New Hire positions that increased payroll costs by $47,000.

Professional services, supplies and materials, and other operating costs are in-line with last year’s budget.

Debt service expenditures remained the same at $190,592 as last year due to principal and interest on the $1,625,000 series 2014A and 2014B notes payable to finance the artificial turf field and all-weather track at Noland Stadium. The notes require semi-annual payments for ten years at 3.199% interest.

Capital outlay expenditures remained the same as last year due to a budgeted new school bus.

(5)

The following graphs provide a comparison of expenditures by object for the fiscal year 2015-16 proposed budget as compared to the initial budget approved for fiscal year 2014-15 as a percentage of the total budgets:

Included in the general fund and special revenue funds are allocations for transfer to the group health internal service fund (ISF). The allocations to the group health ISF are based on premium quotes provided by Teacher Retirement System of Texas.

The transfer of funds is provided to support the group health plan of the employees of the District. Budgeted fund transfers from the general and special revenue funds to the group health internal service funds total $194,403.

(6)

Approximately 95% of the budgeted fund transfers to group health ISF are paid as premium (fixed cost) to the Teacher Retirement System of Texas. The remaining 5% or $9,720 is used to:

 Build the fund balance of the group health plan; and,

 Act as a “Rainy Day” fund for the District’s self-funded dental program. In addition, the group health fund includes the District’s dental plan. This plan is set-up as an employee “break-even” plan. This type of “break-even” plan provides reasonable coverage at a low cost premium to employees. Therefore, no provision has been made to fund this program.

Provisions related to the Workers’ Compensation Fund have been established from funding over the past 15 years. Accumulated reserves at July 31, total approximately $358,054, which well exceeds the fixed cost premium and the loss fund maximum that total $17,085 and $47,285, respectively. Therefore, based on the excessive reserves, no funding provision has been established for FY 2015-16.

RESOURCES TO SUPPORT OPERATIONS

Programs and services included in the general fund and special revenue funds are primarily supported by local and state sources of revenue. A comparison of revenue sources to support operations for the current and proposed general fund and special revenue funds are presented below:

Budget

Initial 2015-16 %

Revenue Sources 2014-15 Proposed Change

Local $2,969,890 $2,735,732 -3.00%

State 4,318,599 4,568,751 3.21%

Federal 511,511 495,517 -0.21%

Total $7,800,000 $7,800,000 0.00%

The following graphs provide a comparison of revenues for the fiscal year 2015-16 and the initial budget approved for fiscal year 2014-15 as a percentage of the total budgets:

(7)

Local sources of revenue supporting the proposed budget represent approximately 35% of the total available sources of funds. Of this amount, the largest source of local revenues available to the District is property tax that is derived from current and delinquent ad valorem tax payments.

The proposed budget requires a tax rate of $1.1700 per $100 valuation. As a result, the total tax burden for the average homeowner will total $586.05 at an average taxable value of residence at $50,090 versus the prior year of

$593.17. This represents a $7.12 decrease, due to a decrease in the

average taxable value of residences of $608 or 1.2%, as compared to last year.

(8)

The District’s total taxable value of all property decreased 8.7% or $19,225,678 to $202,469,489. The decrease is primarily due to reduced property valuations in the oil and gas sector.

Projected property tax revenues are expected to generate approximately $2,319,532 at a tax rate of $1.1700 per $100 valuation for fiscal year 2015-16. This represents a decrease in tax revenues from last year of $233,853 or -9.16% due to reductions in the oil and gas sector.

State revenue sources that support the proposed budget represent approximately 59% of the total available sources of funds. State funding is projected to increase $250,152 to $4,568,751 primarily due to the increased enrollment. Proposed enrollment is approximately 775 students, at 98.5 percent attendance. This projected enrollment will generate sufficient revenue to support the proposed budget.

Federal revenues are projected to decrease $15,994 to $495,517. Federal revenues have very strict requirements that require the District to spend this funding in specific ways in order to be reimbursed by the United States Department of Education.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The District strives to provide an effective mix of quality programs while constantly striving to maintain costs.

We appreciate the support of the Board of Trustees, the citizens of the District, and the business community, all who work cooperatively to ensure the best education for our students and the prudent development of the District. Additionally, we would like to express our gratitude to all employees of the District’s schools for their interest and support in planning and conducting the financial affairs of the District in a responsible and progressive manner.

________________________________ Steven L. Jerden, CPA, CGMA

References

Related documents

UPnP Control Point (DLNA) Device Discovery HTTP Server (DLNA, Chormecast, AirPlay Photo/Video) RTSP Server (AirPlay Audio) Streaming Server.. Figure 11: Simplified

Keywords: Crack tip position, digital image correlation, finite element model updating, stress intensity factors, virtual test, crack propagation8. ∗

Online community: A group of people using social media tools and sites on the Internet OpenID: Is a single sign-on system that allows Internet users to log on to many different.

Planning for the 1999 Iowa Oral Health Survey began in the spring of 1999 and included personnel from the Dental Health Bureau of the Iowa Department of Public Health,

damage howsoever arising (including with prejudice to the generality of the foregoing loss or damage arising.. damage howsoever arising (including with prejudice

The low ticket (paper) status information, acquired through the printer’s auxiliary port, is available to host system, over the printer’s data interface reverse channel (unless

If the roll is equal to or higher then the model's shooting skill then it hits and wounds as described in close combat.. If the roll was lower then the model's shooting skill then

Mackey brings the center a laparoscopic approach to liver and pancreas surgery not available at most area hospitals.. JOSHUA FORMAN, MD