• No results found

e-tb Manager: A Comprehensive Web-Based Tool for Programmatic Management

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "e-tb Manager: A Comprehensive Web-Based Tool for Programmatic Management"

Copied!
62
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

e-TB Manager: g

A Comprehensive Web-Based Tool for Programmatic Management

of TB and Drug Resistant TB of TB and Drug-Resistant TB

Management Sciences for Health Management Sciences for Health

(2)

Facts about TB*

ƒ TB is contagious and airborne; each untreated person

with active TB can infect ~ 10 to 15 people a year

ƒ One third of world population infected with TB (most

vulnerable – people with HIV)

1 8 million died in 2007 (TB is leading killer of people

ƒ 1.8 million died in 2007 (TB is leading killer of people with HIV ~500,000 in 2007)

ƒ 9.27 million new TB cases registered in 2007g

ƒ TB is a worldwide pandemic: among the 15 countries

with the highest estimated TB incidence rates, 13 are in

Af i hil h lf f ll i i A i

Africa, while half of all new cases are in six Asian

countries (Bangladesh, China, India, Indonesia, Pakistan and the Philippines)

(3)

Facts about TB

cont

Facts about TB,

cont.

ƒ Multidrug-resistant TB (MDR-TB) is a form of TB that

does not respond to the standard treatments using first does not respond to the standard treatments using first-line drugs – 511,000 new MDR-TB cases in 2007

ƒ Extensively drug-resistant TB (XDR-TB) occurs when y g ( ) resistance to second-line drugs develops

ƒ WHO’s Stop TB Strategy aims to reach all patients and

achieve the target under the Millennium Development achieve the target under the Millennium Development Goals (MDG): to reduce by 2015 the prevalence of and deaths due to TB by 50% relative to 1990 and reverse the trend in incidence

ƒ Required investment to achieve the MDG target is

estimated at US$ 67 billion (there’s a 40 billion gap) estimated at US$ 67 billion (there s a 40 billion gap)

(4)

International Response

International Response

ƒ Guidance: WHO, StopTB, UNIONGuidance: WHO, StopTB, UNION

ƒ TB control is well standardized (consensus on forms, guidelines,

recommendations)

ƒ Funding mechanisms: The Global Fund, UNITAID, Bill

Gates, governments (USAID, DfID, etc)

ƒ Sources of TB medicines: GDF, GLC

ƒ Technical resources: UNION, KNCV, MSF, PIH, ICRC,

MSH t

(5)

Information management for TB:

Information management for TB:

•Information tools are required by Global Initiatives (GLC/GDF, Stop TB…)

ƒWHO ERR working group revised formsWHO ERR working group revised forms

ƒ Catalogue (existing software)

http://www.who.int/tb/err/catalogue/

ƒBut to date there was no tool integrating consistently all programmatic dimensions for management purposes

(6)

NTP Challenges

g

Most countries will not reach MDG by 2015

ƒ Lack of actual support from governmentspp g

ƒ Low detection rate (poor diagnosis, advocacy, education)

ƒ Poor compliance with treatment (by providers and patients)

ƒ High default rate

ƒ Co-infection with HIV

I t ti i d l ( th GDF t i )

ƒ Interruptions in drug supply (even the GDF countries)

ƒ Spread of MDR/XDR TB (increased length of treatment and

costs = X 1000) costs X 1000)

ƒ Lack of proper supervision, recording and reporting

Many of the challenges can be addressed through strengthening MIS

(7)

e-TB Manager: Web based system

g

y

ƒ Aligned with WHO recommendations for DOTS and DOTS

Plus programs (standard data collection recording and Plus programs (standard data collection, recording and reporting)

ƒ Easy online information sharing / consolidation between

different levels and data extraction tool to other interfaces

ƒ Rapid response to case and drug management issues

ƒ Database protected by a validation process from upper

level

ƒ Internal security features and unique patient identification

ƒ Developed with open sources technical solutions, no

additional licenses needed

ƒ Can be used with a mixed system of online reporting and

paper system at periphery levels

(8)

Online notification and follow-up, recording clinical and laboratory results, tracking patient transfers in and out,

providing data on patients regimen schemes, treatment adherence, patient contacts’ evaluation,

consultation agenda

Treatment and case management

First Line medicines management Medicine needs’ forecasting, ordering, distributing, Data extraction Information and surveillance management dispensing, and recording of stock movements + DM indicators at all levels Second Line medicines management tool / Operational and clinical research at all levels

For easy data analysis and export to statistical interfaces

Mapping of TB and MDR/XDR cases,

epidemiological indicators, surveillance reports, previous treatment history, co-morbidities, up-dated information with ready access online

at central and periphery levels at central and periphery levels

(9)

For the system to support

the TB program

appropriately, there must be

clear guidelines and core

clear guidelines and core

staff must be experienced in

MDR-TB management

MDR TB management

ƒ Diagnosis

ƒ Treatment protocols, patient

management management

ƒ Consistent flows for

(10)
(11)
(12)
(13)
(14)
(15)
(16)

Note: Simulation Data for Demo Note: Simulation Data for Demo

(17)
(18)
(19)
(20)
(21)
(22)
(23)
(24)
(25)

Slide 24

lh25 this doesn't show much--you could just use the next slide and talk about administration

(26)
(27)

Name displayed in the system

Address (where to send orders to) Region and locality (also used in user view)

Checked if the unit is a treatment health unit (case management) Checked if the unit stores medicine (medicine management module)

Enables the unit to use the medicine receiving module

Select who is going to deliver medicine orders to this unitg g

Used to calculate the quantity estimated when creating a new order If checked, the user may change the quantity estimate when creating a new Check it if the unit y g

order

If the order has to be authorized before delivering, select the unit that authorizes it

If the unit registers medicine dispensing enter the delivers medicine to

other units (order delivery)

If the unit registers medicine dispensing, enter the dispensing registration frequency (daily, weekly or monthly)

(28)
(29)
(30)
(31)
(32)

Online tools for medicines forecasting,

ordering, distribution, and dispensing

ƒ

Tracks stocks positions at

central and periphery level;

p

p

y

;

ƒ

Calculates upcoming needs

for medicines dispensing at

p

g

treatment centers / sites

ƒ

Controls estimated and real

consumption

ƒ

Provides reports and

indicators

(33)

Distribution flow:

S Central Warehouse Sources: GLC/GDF MoH GF

Regional Regional Regional

Regional Warehouse Regional Warehouse Regional Warehouse District District District District District Treatment Center Treatment Center Treatment Center Treatment Center Treatment Center Treatment Center TS TS TS TS TS TS TS TS TS TS TS TS TS

(34)
(35)
(36)
(37)
(38)
(39)
(40)
(41)
(42)
(43)
(44)
(45)
(46)

Epidemiological Reports

p

g

p

ƒ

Incidence/incidence

ƒ

Co-morbidities

rate

ƒ

Prevalence/prevalence

t

ƒ

Previous treatments/

treatment history

C

t

i

ti

i i

rate

ƒ

Demographic

characteristics

ƒ

Contamination origin

ƒ

Contacts identification

and evaluation

characteristics

ƒ

Resistance patterns

ƒ

Clinical/X-rays patterns

and evaluation

ƒ

Adverse reactions

ƒ

Treatment outcomes/

Clinical/X rays patterns

ƒ

HIV/AIDS(diagnosis/

co-infection rate)

Treatment outcomes/

cohort analysis

(47)

Operational Reports

p

p

ƒ

Suspects or cases search/identification

L b

t

t

l

(

ti

t

h t)

ith

ƒ

Laboratory exams at a glance (patient or cohort) with

conversion rates

ƒ

Treatment history/regimens at a glance (patient or

ƒ

Treatment history/regimens at a glance (patient or

cohort)

ƒ

Case management agenda (dates for exams

ƒ

Case management agenda (dates for exams,

appointments, defaulters list, etc.)

ƒ

Mapping case transfers

ƒ

Mapping case transfers

ƒ

Treatment adherence/medicines dispensing reports

(48)
(49)
(50)
(51)
(52)
(53)
(54)

Resistance Profile

Jan. 1994 – Mar. 2009 (n= 3,798)

Brazil or States City of Residence Month/Year Begins Month/Year Ends Residence Treatment Health Facility Nº of treatments for DR-TB Generate Report Probably DR-TB Confirmed DR-TB Resistance Profile Probably DR TB Confirmed DR TB Sensitive to R Sensitive to H Sensitive to RH Sensitive to all drugs tested Other combinations of resistance

(55)

Evaluation of Contacts (Pará State)

Jan. 1994 – Mar. 2009 (n= 1,218 identified)( , )

City of Residence Identified Examined with TB

(56)
(57)

e-TB Manager

: Where Are We Today ?

ƒ Currently adopted as national TB surveillance MIS for DR-TB in Brazil

(including all re-treatment cases for better prevention of MDR-XDR (including all re treatment cases for better prevention of MDR XDR emergence)

ƒ Integrated with the national DR-TB MIS in Romania and Moldova

ƒ Active field pilot testing in the Philippines, Dominican Republic and

Uk i ( MOH )

Ukraine (on MOH server)

ƒ Being adapted for: Armenia, Georgia, Azerbaijan, Uzbekistan

ƒ Requests from countries: Namibia

ƒ Collaboration with WHO – a possibility for e-TBM to become a

WHO-recommended MIS tool

(58)

Challenges and Lessons Learned

ƒ

E-TBM cannot just be installed and used:

ƒ Need for extensive TA to streamline the existing MIS for

ƒ Need for extensive TA to streamline the existing MIS for

TB (procedures, SOPs, data forms)

ƒ Need for adaptation to country requirements

ƒ Training of users, TOT

ƒ

Lack of clear national treatment guidelines for TB

and MDR TB, and SOPs for lab and drug

management

ƒ

WHO is constantly changing data forms

ƒ

Lack of infrastructure: must develop PC-based

i

i l d t b

(59)

Challenges and Lessons Learned cont

Challenges and Lessons Learned, cont.

ƒ

Need to sign a MOU:

ƒ NTP may lack authority, bureaucratic procedures

ƒ

Engaging stakeholders – national working groups

ƒ

Competition (most NTPs already have some

electronic tools in place)

V

li it d f

di

f

TBM i

l

t ti

ƒ

Very limited funding for e-TBM implementation

ƒ

Partnering with other projects in the field is crucial

(b t

t l

h

t f

li

l ti

)

(but not clear how to formalize relations)

ƒ

Endorsement from major players is important

(WHO KNCV UNION GDF/GLC UNITAID etc )

(WHO, KNCV, UNION, GDF/GLC, UNITAID, etc.)

(60)

Implementation steps in a new country: May take

from 2-3 months to one year

from 2 3 months to one year

Recon-• Present e-TBM main features

• Understand country’s health system structure, operation, standards for TB

d/ DR TB d d

• On-site pilot on selected TB units to evaluate system

ff ti fit ith

naissance visit

and/or DR-TB, and needs

• Define necessary system customization • Define working group, responsibility

matrix and MoU

On-site pilot

effectiveness, fit with current flows and

procedures and acceptance by end users

System customization

• Customize e-TBM functionalities and interfaces to address country needs

Final system adjustments

• Adjust system based on pilot outcome

Remote testing

• Remotely test initial e-TBM version to identify potential bugs and need for further adjustments

Implementation/ training

• Implement system on country’s proprietary server and train IT personnel

• Train potential trainers or end users (depends on number of

System adjustments

• Adjust system based on remote testing outcome

Maintenance

sites)

• Guarantee remote on-going support to country`s IT team and end users

adjustments

(61)

System cost to USAID/MSH, from customization to implementation

and maintenance, ranges from US$50-70k ESTIMATIVE

Estimates based on a

comprehensive cost model designed for e-TBM

System cost to USAID/MSH

PROJECT SCHEDULE AND CHARACTERISTICS COST (USD)

System cost $70.112

Duration

PHASES weeks Programmer MSH Other

1. Reconnaissance visit 1 2 2 1 $10.928

2. System customization 4 6 2 0 $14.400

3. Remote testing 1 0 $0

4. System adjustments 1 2 1 0 $5.200

5. On-site pilot 1 1 1 1 $7.728

6. Final system adjustments 1 2 1 0 $5.200

7. Implementation/training 1 1 1 2 $12.256

Total to implement 10 14 8 0 $55.712

Time required (weeks FTE per phase) Number of intl. trips

Intl.*

Weeks FTE* Weeks FTE* Intl.*

p

8. Maintenance/support 52 6 2 0 $14.400

Monthly

Infrastructure MONTHLY cost $6.194

IT infrastructure Number required

Server 1 $283 Computers 40 $1.111 Internet access 40 $1.600 Helpdesk FTE required 1 $3.200 1. Reconnaissance visit 2. System customization 1 -1 4 1 1 trips Prog. MSH 1 -2 6 2 2 trips Prog. MSH 3. Remote testing 4. System adjustments 5. On-site pilot

6. Final system adjustments 7 I l t ti /t i i -1 -1 -1 1 1 1 -½ 1 ½ 1 -1 -2 2 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 7. Implementation/training 8. Maintenance/support 1 -1 4** 1 1** 2 -1 6** 1 2** 60

* FTE: Full Time Equivalent; Intl.: International ** Within the total phase duration (52 weeks)

(62)

Ongoing operational and maintenance costs for host country

depend on number of sites and infrastruture required ESTIMATIVE

Monthly maintenance/operational cost to host country

Estimates based on a comprehensive cost

model designed for e-TBM

PROJECT SCHEDULE AND CHARACTERISTICS COST (USD)

System cost $70.112

Duration

PHASES weeks Programmer MSH Other

1. Reconnaissance visit 1 2 2 1 $10.928

2. System customization 4 6 2 0 $14.400

3. Remote testing 1 0 $0

4. System adjustments 1 2 1 0 $5.200

5. On-site pilot 1 1 1 1 $7.728

6. Final system adjustments 1 2 1 0 $5.200 $

Time required (weeks FTE per phase) Number of intl. trips 7. Implementation/training 1 1 1 2 $12.256

Total to implement 10 14 8 0 $55.712

8. Maintenance/support 52 6 2 0 $14.400

Monthly

Infrastructure MONTHLY cost $6.194

IT infrastructure Number required

Server 1 $283 Computers 40 $1.111 Internet access 40 $1.600

Helpdesk

FTE required 1 $3.200

Number of total sites*

Number of servers required

Number of IT** infrastructure

required (computer + internet)

20 1 20 60 1 20 10 0 1 50

required (computer internet) 50

61

* Influences number of support staff required. Model assumes 1 helpdesk FTE can support up to 50 sites ** Information technology

References

Related documents

As you may recall, last year Evanston voters approved a referendum question for electric aggregation and authorized the city to negotiate electricity supply rates for its residents

All students are required to have internet access to check elearn for course updates and materials. Internet access is available in the RC Lab and the HSC Resource room,

By using our website you consent to all cookies in accordance with our Cookie Policy.. Download as Pdf Hormigón I; Carlos Ricardo

Renesas Electronics does not assume any liability for infringement of patents, copyrights, or other intellectual property rights of third parties by or arising from the use of

Description: In the age of big data, scientific data analytics work increasingly needs to involve with a huge volume of observation data, which should be manipulated,

Three themes also emerged as motivators for the participants that enabled them to overcome the barriers they faced and experience resilience, these were perceiving the profession as

S urgery remains the cornerstone in the early-stage non– small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treatment, but a lot of efforts have been focused on the use of systemic therapy in

The aim of this study is to appraise various financial instruments like equity/stocks, term deposits in banks, Kisan Vikas Patra, national savings certificate, insurance