• No results found

Hard Candy HACCP

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Hard Candy HACCP"

Copied!
5
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

HACCP for Hard Candy

HACCP for Hard Candy

Finished Product Profile

Finished Product Profile

Common Name:

Common Name:

(e.g.

(e.g. name, type,

name, type, size)

size)

Hard Candy

Hard Candy

Process:

Process:

(e.g. heat tr

(e.g. heat treated, shelf stable,

eated, shelf stable, low moistur

low moisture)

e)

How is it to be used:

How is it to be used:

(e.g. ready

(e.g. ready to consume, heat

to consume, heat and consume)

and consume)

Ready to eat as purchased

Ready to eat as purchased

Type of packaging:

Type of packaging:

(e.g. plastic, glass, modified atmosphere)

(e.g. plastic, glass, modified atmosphere)

Packaged in cardboard sealends or fleible film pouch

Packaged in cardboard sealends or fleible film pouch

packaging

packaging

Length of shelf life:

Length of shelf life:

(e.g. length

(e.g. length of time and temperat

of time and temperature conditions)

ure conditions)

Facility specific 

Facility specific 

!helf stable candies+

(2)

#ngredient Ha$ard Analysis

Pre"enti"ePrere$uisite programs

-ikely Risk

in effect or correcti"e

ngredient in order

High, /edium, or -ow

action to assure

of $uantity

0nown hazards

Probability

!e"erity

finished product safety

1ranulated

sugar

23

4one

low

low

C3

4one

low

low

P3 oreign matter

low

low

C5#+ 2ulk ngred Recei"ing policy

Corn

syrup

23

4one

low

low

C3

4one

low

low

P3 oreign matter

low

low

C5#+ 2ulk ngred Recei"ing policy

6ater

23

7.

Coli

low

low

#nnual

$uality

report

C3

4one

low

low

P3 oreign matter

low

low

n8line filtration

la"ors

23

4one

low

low

C3

4one

low

low

(3)

HACCP for Hard Candy

Ha$ard Analysis and CCP %ustifications

Processing !tep <ustification of decision and pre"entati"e measures

CCP

 1/Ps, !anitation !5Ps and employee training to pre"ent cross contamination 4o

C3 Pkg has unappro"ed !upplier Certificate of #nalysis (C5#) and -etter of guarantee 4o inkssol"entsleadetc

P3oreignmaterial -ettersofguarantee 4o

Plant history with supplier indicates compliance

1/Ps, !anitation !5Ps and employee training to pre"ent cross contamination 4o

C3 4one

P3 oreign material -etters of guarantee+ in8line strainers+ plant history 4o with supplier indicates compliance+ !ee prere$uisite programs 8 2ulk

ngredient Recei"ing policy and nspection=esting !5P>s

1/Ps, !anitation !5Ps and employee training to pre"ent cross contamination 4o

C3 4one

P3 oreign material !ee prere$uisite programs 8 Recei"ing procedures and nspection=esting !5 P> s 4o 1/Ps, !anitation !5Ps and employee training to pre"ent cross contamination 4o

C34one

P3 oreign material !ee prere$uisite programs 8 Pest Control policy and !anitation !5P>s 4o !torage 23 ?eastmold 6eekly monitoring of li$uid sugar and corn syrup pH to pre"ent growth+ finished 4o of bulk product water acti"ity growth of yeast or mold+ ;@ light protection

ingredients !ee prere$usite program 8 ;@ -ight policy C34one

!ee prere$uisite programs 8 Pest Control policy and !anitation !5P>s 4o 1/Ps, !anitation !5Ps and employee training to pre"ent cross contamination 4o

C34one Hazard #nalysis (introduced, controlled, or enhanced here) Recei"e packaging supplies 23 Cross contamination of AcleanA areas by dust, personnel

Recei"e bulk ingredients

23 Cross contamination of AcleanA areas by dust, personnel

Recei"e non8bulk ingredients

23 Cross contamination of AcleanA areas by dust, personnel

!torage of packaging materials

23 Cross contamination of AcleanA areas by dust, personnel

P3 oreign material or infestation

!torage of non bulk ingredients

23 Cross contamination of AcleanA areas by dust, personnel

(4)

ingredients C3 4one P34one

 #ddition of 23 #ssociate handling !ee prere$uisite program 8 1/P policy and 1lo"e policy 4o

rework C34one

P3oreignmaterial 4o

!trainer policy, Returned 1oods policy

/iing !ee prere$uisite program 8 1/P policy and 1lo"e policy 4o

C34one

P3 oreign material !ee prere$uisite programs 8 !trainer policy and /agnet policy 4o Cooking !ee prere$uisite program 8 1/P policy and 1lo"e policy

C3 4one

!ee prere$uisite programs 8 !trainer policy and /agnet policy 4o orming !ee prere$uisite program 8 1/P policy and 1lo"e policy

C34one P34one

!izing !ee prere$uisite program 8 1/P policy and 1lo"e policy

C34one

P3 4one !ee prere$uisite programs 8 oreign /atter policy 4o Packaging 23 #ssociate handling !ee prere$uisite programs 8 1/P policy and 1lo"e policy 4o

!upplier Certificate of #nalysis (C5#) and -etter of guarantee

P3 oreign material !ee /etal 9etection Policy  &es

CCP ' inished product 23 4one

storage C34one

P3 nfestation !ee prere$uisite programs 8 Pest Control policy and !anitation !5P>s 4o !hipping 234one

C34one

P34one Refrigeratedshipping

!ee prere$uisite programs 8 Rework policy, oreign /atter policy, 23 Potential for cross

contamination due to e$uipmenthandling

23 Potential for cross contamination due to e$uipmenthandling P3 oreign

materialmetals 23 Potential for cross contamination due to e$uipmenthandling

23 Potential for cross contamination due to e$uipmenthandling

C3 ;nappro"ed food additi"es

(5)

HACCP for Hard Candy

Ha$ard Analysis and CCP %ustifications

Critical -imit Correcti"e #ction Records @erification

/etal /agnets Hold notice Critical Control Point !ignificant Hazard <ustify decision 8 what <ustify decision 8 how <ustify decision 8 fre$uency <ustify decision 8 who CCPB 8 Packaging

Packaged goods must pass through a metal detector calibrated with .Dmm ferrous, .& mm non8ferrous and stainless steel test spheres Pass test material through and check metal sensiti"ity with test wand 2efore each run and e"ery B hours during each run Process 5perator 

Re8screen, hold for e"aluation or reEect oreign obEect record 9aily record re"iew ncident report Fuarterly process re"iew

References

Related documents

Specifically, in the case of the Herring River, where these fresh water marsh sediments were collected, we predict restoration of tidal flow would (a) greatly inhibit the

hCD163L-1 pigs showed one half fold less infectivity compared to WT pigs when compared across seven various PRRSV isolates. C) Null PAMs failed to support virus infection.. 45..

The commentary concludes with a model of how educators can apply reflective journaling to assess learning of course objectives and improve individual and organizational

To address these objectives, GAO reviewed relevant provisions in federal, state, and local laws; conducted site visits to various redevelopment projects where eminent domain

TABLE 3 | Adonis analyses of the variance in of whole, core and satellite AMF communities explained by soil properties at each sampling time, and all times combined.. ∗

Security Policy (2.) Interaction Policy (Run-time) (1.) Permission Granting Policy (Install-time) (1.1)Protection-level based Policy (1.2) Signature- based Policy (1.3) Application

Net wealth, as emphasized by traditional models of consumer choice, seems less relevant than liquid wealth for MPCs, as several households are wealthy, yet let their

diaries of Hygienists and Romantic writers, have shown that testimonies of he‘e nalu – including the ones conceived as display of Hawaiian traditions – are critical to reassess