• No results found

DISTRICT CENSUS HANDBOOK

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "DISTRICT CENSUS HANDBOOK"

Copied!
130
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

Census of India 2011

CHANDIGARH

SERIES-05

PART XII-B

DISTRICT CENSUS HANDBOOK

CHANDIGARH

VILLAGE AND TOWN WISE

PRIMARY CENSUS ABSTRACT (PCA)

DIRECTORATE OF CENSUS OPERATIONS

(2)
(3)
(4)

Khuda Alisher (C.T.) KAIMBWALA WARD 1 WARD 2 WARD 3 WARD 4 WARD 5 WARD 6 WARD 7 WARD 8 WARD 9 WARD 10 WARD 11 WARD 12 WARD 13 WARD 14 WARD 15 WARD 16 WARD 17 WARD 18 WARD 19 WARD 20 WARD 21 WARD 22 WARD 23 WARD 24 WARD 25 WARD 26 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 25 24 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56

^

26 EAST NH 21 Su khna Cho e

IndustriPhase Ial AreaI

WARD 23 WEST OF SECT OR 38 WEST OF SECT OR 25 DHANAS Patia li Ra o Indust rial A rea Phase I R e s e r v e d A r e a Behlana (C.T.) Mauli Jagran(C.T.) RAIPUR KHURD Daria (C.T.) 61 63 Sukh na Nadi Sukhna Lake From S .A.S. Na gar ( Moha li) To S.A .S. Nagar (Moha li) To Rupn agar From Ambala To A mbala To Kalka From Mullanp ur

P

U

N

J

A

B

P

U

N

I N D I A

WARD-5 Mani Majra (R), Basti Kishangarh, Basti Bhagwanpura (C.T.) To Chandi Mandir ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! NH 21 NH 21 040089 040091 040092 040094 040095 040097 040096 040098 From Rupnag ar ! 800286 # Chandigarh (M. Corp. + OG) #

DISTRICT CHANDIGARH

2011

Note:

Figures shown inside the map in black colour indicate Sector Numbers.

J

A

B

BOUNDARY : STATE/ UNION TERRITORY... ... ... ... ... ... .... " WARD WITH NO. ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... HEADQUARTERS : UNION TERRITORY / DISTRICT... ... .. VILLAGES HAVING 5000 AND ABOVE POPULATION WITH NAME... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... URBAN AREA WITH POPULATION SIZE: I, IV & V ... ... ... ... . NATIONAL HIGHWAY ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... .. IMPORTANT METALLED ROADS... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... .... RAILWAY LINE WITH STATION, BROAD GAUGE ... ... ... ... . RIVER / CHOE ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... .... WATER FEATURES: POND / LAKE... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ...

^

NH 21 #

P

U

N

J A

B

RS

H

A

R

Y

A

N

A

RS Ka ns al N adi

1

0.5

Kilometers

0

1

2

Patia li Rao # DA KSHIN M ARG SH AN TI PAT H VIDYA PATH JAN MA RG HIMAL AYA M ARG SARO VAR P ATH CHAN DI PA TH SUKH NA PA TH UTTA R MAR G UDYA N PATH UTTA R MAR G UD YO G PAT H ! ! ! !

!

P

WARD 23 DHANAS

!

P

TOTAL AREA OF DISTRICT (In Sq. Km.)...114.00 TOTAL POPULATION OF DISTRICT...10,55,450 TOTAL NUMBER OF TOWNS IN DISTRICT... 6 TOTAL NUMBER OF VILLAGES IN DISTRICT...5 ,

(5)

CENSUS OF INDIA 2011

CHANDIGARH

SERIES-05

PART XII - B

DISTRICT CENSUS HANDBOOK

CHANDIGARH

VILLAGE AND TOWN WISE

PRIMARY CENSUS ABSTRACT (PCA)

Directorate of Census Operations

Chandigarh

(6)

© Government of India, Copyright 2014

Published by:

Directorate of Census Operations, Chandigarh

(7)

M O T I F

C H A N D I G A R H

Chandigarh is the most modern and well planned city of India.

Formation of various creations like Rock Garden, Sukhna Lake, IT

Park, War Memorial, ‘Secretariat’ a master piece of architecture,

Museums, and Green Gardens have given charming look to a bouquet

of the “City Beautiful”.

(8)

Pages

1

Foreword

1

2

Preface

3

3

Acknowledgement

4

4

History and Scope of the District Census Handbook

5

5

Brief History of the State and District

7

6

Administrative Setup

10

7

Districts Highlights - 2011 Census

12

8

Important Statistics

13

9

Section - I Primary Census Abstract (PCA)

(i)

Brief note on Primary Census Abstract

17

21

(ii)

District Primary Census Abstract

(iii) Appendix to District Primary Census Abstract Total, Scheduled

Castes and Scheduled Tribes Population-Urban Block wise

29

(iv) Primary Census Abstract for Scheduled Castes (SC)

77

(v)

Primary Census Abstract for Scheduled Tribes (ST)

85

(vi) Rural PCA-C.D. blocks wise Village Primary Census Abstract

87

(vii) Urban PCA-Town wise Primary Census Abstract

95

10

Section –II Tables based on Households Amenities and Assets

(Rural /Urban) at District and Sub-District level

(i)

Table -1:

Households by Ownership status and by Number of

Dwelling rooms occupied in the District, 2011

(9)

(ii)

Table -2:

Percentage distribution of Households living in

Permanent, Semi permanent and Temporary houses,

2011

106

(iii) Table -3:

Number and Percentage of Households by main

source of Drinking water, 2011

108

(iv) Table -4:

Number and Percentage of Households by main

source of Lighting, 2011

110

(v)

Table -5:

Number and Percentage of Households by type of

Latrine facility, 2011

112

(vi) Table -6:

Number and Percentage of Households by type of

Drainage connectivity for waste water outlet, 2011

114

(vii) Table -7:

Number and Percentage of Households by availability

of Kitchen facility, 2011

115

(viii) Table -8:

Number and Percentage of Households by type of fuel

used for Cooking, 2011

116

(ix) Table -9:

Number and Percentage of Households availing

Banking services and number of Households having

each of the specified Assets in, 2011

(10)

1

The District Census Handbook (DCHB) is an important publication of the

Census Organization since 1951. It contains both Census and non Census data

of urban and rural areas for each District. The Census data provide information

on demographic and socio-economic characteristics of population at the lowest

administrative unit i.e. of each Village, Town and Ward of the District. The

Primary Census Abstract (PCA) part of this publication contains Census data

including data on household amenities collected during 1

st

phase of the Census

i.e. House Listing and Housing Census. The non Census data presented in the

DCHB is in the form of Village Directory and Town Directory contain information

on various infrastructure facilities available in the village and town viz;

education, medical, drinking water, communication and transport, post and

telegraph, electricity, banking, and other miscellaneous facilities. Later on, the

Telegraph Services were closed by the Government of India on 15

th

July, 2013.

The data of DCHB are of considerable importance in the context of planning and

development at the grass-root level.

2. In the 1961 Census, DCHB provided a descriptive account of the District,

administrative statistics, Census tables and Village and Town Directory including

Primary Census Abstract. This pattern was changed in 1971 Census and the

DCHB was published in three parts: Part-A related to Village and Town

Directory, Part-B to Village and Town PCA and Part-C comprised analytical

report, administrative statistics, District Census tables and certain analytical

tables based on PCA and amenity data in respect of Villages. The 1981 Census

DCHB was published in two parts: Part-A contained Village and Town Directory

and Part-B the PCA of Village and Town including the SCs and STs PCA up to

Tahsil/Town levels. New features along with restructuring of the formats of

Village and Town Directory were added. In Village Directory, all amenities except

electricity were brought together and if any amenity was not available in the

referent Village, the distance in broad ranges from the nearest place having such

an amenity, was given.

3. The pattern of 1981 Census was followed by and large for the DCHB of

1991 Census except the format of PCA. It was restructured. Nine-fold industrial

classification of main workers was given against the four-fold industrial

classification presented in the 1981 Census. In addition, sex wise population in

0-6 age group was included in the PCA for the first time with a view to enable the

data users to compile more realistic literacy rate as all children below 7 years of

age had been treated as illiterate at the time of 1991 Census. One of the

important innovations in the 1991 Census was the Community Development

Block (CD Block) level presentation of Village Directory and PCA data instead of

the traditional Tahsil/Taluk/PS level presentation.

4. As regards DCHB of 2001 Census, the scope of Village Directory was

improved by including some other amenities like banking, recreational and

cultural facilities, newspapers & magazines and `most important commodity’

manufactured in a Village in addition to prescribed facilities of earlier Censuses.

In Town Directory, the statement on Slums was modified and its coverage was

enlarged by including details on all slums instead of ‘notified slums’.

5. The scope and coverage of Village Directory of 2011 DCHB has been widened

by including a number of new amenities in addition to those of 2001. These

newly added amenities are: Pre-Primary School, Engineering College, Medical

(11)

2

College, Management Institute, Polytechnic, Non-formal Training Centre,

Special School for Disabled, Community Health Centre, Veterinary Hospital,

Mobile Health Clinic, Medical Practitioner with MBBS Degree, Medical

Practitioner with no degree, Traditional Practitioner and faith Healer, Medicine

Shop, Community Toilet, Rural Sanitary Mart or Sanitary Hardware Outlet in

the Village, Community Bio- gas, Sub Post Office, Village Pin Code, Public Call

Office, Mobile Phone Coverage, Internet Cafes/ Common Service Centre, Private

Courier Facility, Auto/Modified Autos, Taxis and Vans, Tractors, Cycle-pulled

Rickshaws, Carts driven by Animals, Village connected to National Highway,

State Highway, Major District Road, and Other District Road, Availability of

Water Bounded Macadam Roads in Village, ATM, Self-Help Group, Public

Distribution System(PDS) Shop, Mandis/Regular Market, Weekly Haat,

Agricultural Marketing Society, Nutritional Centers (ICDS), Anganwadi Centre,

ASHA (Accredited Social Health Activist), Sports Field, Public Library, Public

Reading Room, Assembly Polling station, Birth & Death Registration Office. In the

Town Directory, seven Statements containing the details and the data of each

Town have been presented viz.; (i) Status and Growth History of Towns, (ii)

Physical Aspects and Location of Towns, (iii) Civic and other Amenities (iv)

Medical Facilities, (v) Educational, Recreational & Cultural Facilities, (vi)

Industry & Banking, and (vii) Civic & other amenities in Slums respectively. CD

Block wise data of Village Directory and Village PCA have been presented in

DCHB of 2011 Census as presented in earlier Census.

6. The data of DCHB 2011 Census have been presented in two parts, Part-A

contains Village and Town Directory and Part-B contains Village and Town wise

Primary Census Abstract. Both the Parts have been published in separate

volumes in 2011 Census.

7. The Village and Town level amenities data have been collected, compiled

and computerized under the supervision of Ms T.N.Bindhyeshwari, IAS, Director

of Census Operation Chandigarh. The task of Planning, Designing and

Co-ordination of this publication was carried out by Dr. Pratibha Kumari, Assistant

Registrar General (SS) under the guidance & supervision of Dr. R.C.Sethi,

Ex-Addl. RGI and Shri Deepak Rastogi present Ex-Addl.RGI. Shri A.P. Singh, Deputy

Registrar General, (Map) provided the technical guidance in the preparation of

maps. Shri A.K. Arora, Joint Director of Data Processing Division under the

overall supervision of Shri M.S.Thapa, Addl. Director (EDP) provided full

cooperation in preparation of record structure for digitization and validity

checking of Village and Town Directory data and the programme for the

generation of Village Directory and Town Directory including various analytical

inset tables as well as Primary Census Abstract (PCA). The work of preparation of

DCHB, 2011 Census has been monitored in the Social Studies Division. I am

thankful to all of them and others who have contributed to bring out this

publication in time.

(C. Chandramouli)

Registrar General &

Census Commissioner, India

New Delhi

(12)

3

The complete profile in all the fields of a city is quite visible from the

indicators, which presents detailed information on a particular area in the form of

literature or data to know the facts and figures. This necessitates District highlights

to be explored at broad level in the form of Village and Town wise Primary Census

Abstract. Publication of the District Census Handbooks (DCHBs) was initiated after

the 1951 Census and is continuing since then with innovations/modifications after

each decennial census. This is the most valuable district level publication brought

out by the census organization on behalf of each State government/Union Territory

administration. Details of Primary Census Abstract category wise and basic units of

the District have been shown in Section I of this publication. Inter-alia Section II of

this

publication

provides

data/information

on

certain

important

civic

amenities/facilities existing in Rural and Urban areas.

The District Census Handbook has two segments: Part A and Part B. Part A

primarily deals with village and town Directory and Part B contains Primary Census

Abstract of each village and town of the District. Since 2001, the District Census

Handbooks are being made available in electronic format. The District Census

Handbook is the collaborative effort of the Census Directorate and the Chandigarh

Administration. On behalf of the Chandigarh Administration, this Directorate has

prepared the manuscript of this book. This part of District Census Handbook of

2011 have some additional information on availability of amenities, which is based

on the 2011 Census as compared to the previous censuses like broad categories

indicating source of drinking water, lighting, and drainage. Information on basic

amenities with expanded indicators and availability of assets like computer/laptop

with and without internet, bifurcation of telephone to landline and mobile has been

new additions in this book. Another aspect in marking development of

telecommunication and technological advancement, information on mobile and

computer has been included.

For the preparation of manuscript of this book, I received wholehearted

cooperation from all the Heads of Departments, Heads of Offices of the Chandigarh

Administration, Estate Office, and Deputy Commissioner, Chandigarh. I am grateful

to a large number of dedicated field staff of Chandigarh Administration and

experienced Census staff for their valuable contribution in the accomplishment of

this task of national importance. I must place on record the extended co-operation

extended by the Tahsildar (Revenue) and Block Development & Panchayat Office,

Chandigarh in timely providing the information to digitize data for Village and Town

Directory of Union Territory, Chandigarh.

I am deeply grateful to Dr. C. Chandramouli, IAS the Registrar General and

Census Commissioner, India, New Delhi for the valuable guidance and advice at

every step till the finalization of this handbook. Collection, compilation of data, and

drafting of DCHB Part B has been initiated under the supervision of Ms. T. N.

Bindhyeshwari, IAS, Director of Census Operations, Chandigarh.

All the corrections suggested by DP Division, New Delhi have been

incorporated and tables/annexures made as per corrected final data of 2011 Census.

My gratitude to all those who worked on completing the project.

K. S. Bhatnagar

Joint Director

Chandigarh

(13)

4

Acknowledgements

Editing and Supervision

Sh. K. S. Bhatnagar, Joint Director, Controlling Officer

Sh. Suresh Kumar Sharma, Assistant Director (DC)

Sh. Anadi Kumar, S. I. Grade I

Smt. Manjit Kaur, S. I. Grade I

Smt. Promila Mathur, S. I. Grade I

Drafting / Write up

Sh. B. M. K. Shorey, S. I. Grade II

Scrutiny of Data

Sh. Rajesh Kumar Chawla, Senior Supervisor

Smt. Supriya, S. I. Grade II

Sh. B. M. K. Shorey, S. I. Grade II

Mapping

Smt. Varinder Kaur, Senior Geographer

Sh. Gurdeep Dhiman, Clerk

ORGI- Data Processing Division

Shri Jaspal Singh Lamba, DD(EDP)

Ms. Usha, AD (EDP)

Shri Anurag Gupta, DPA Grade ‘A’

Shri Mukesh Kumar Mahawar, DPA Grade ‘A’

Ms. Shagufta Nasreen Bhat, DPA Grade ‘A’

Shri Khem Verma Jadon, Sr. Consultant

Shri Yashwant Singh, Jr. Consultant

(14)

5

The need of data at the grass root level for the administrative and

planning purposes at sub micro level as well as academic studies prompted the

innovation of District Census Handbook. District Census Handbook is a

unique publication from the Census organization which provides most

authentic details of census and non-census information from village and town

level to district level. The District Census Handbook was firstly introduced

during the 1951 Census. It contains both census and non census data of urban

as well as rural areas for each district. The census data contain several

demographic and socio-economic characteristics of the lowest administrative

unit i.e. of each village and town and ward of the district. The non census data

comprise of data on availability of various civic amenities and infrastructural

facilities etc. at the town and village level which constitute Village Directory and

Town Directory part of the DCHB. The data of DCHB are of considerable

importance in the context of planning and development at grass-root level.

In 1961 census DCHB provided a descriptive account of the district,

administrative statistics, census tables and village and town directory including

Primary Census Abstract. This pattern was changed in 1971 Census and the

DCHB was published in three parts: Part-A related to village and town

directory, Part-B to village and town PCA and Part-C comprised analytical

report, administrative statistics, district census tables and certain analytical

tables based on PCA and amenity data in respect of villages. The 1981 census

DCHB was published in two parts: Part-A contained village and town directory

and Part-B the PCA of village and town including the SCs and STs PCA up to

tahsil/town levels. New features along with restructuring of the formats of

village and town directory were added into it. In Village Directory, all amenities

except electricity were brought together and if any amenity was not available in

the referent village, the distance in broad ranges from the nearest place having

such an amenity, was given.

The pattern of 1981 census was followed by and large for the DCHB of

1991 Census except the format of PCA. It was restructured. Nine-fold

industrial classification of main workers was given against the four-fold

industrial classification presented in the 1981 census. In addition, sex wise

population in 0-6 age group was included in the PCA for the first time with a

view to enable the data users to compile more realistic literacy rate as all

children below 7 years of age had been treated as illiterate at the time of 1991

census. One of the important innovations in the 1991 census was the

Community Development Block (CD Block) level presentation of village directory

and PCA data instead of the traditional tahsil/taluk/PS level presentation.

As regards DCHB of 2001 Census, the scope of Village Directory was

improved by including some other amenities like banking, recreational and

cultural facilities, newspapers & magazines and `most important commodity’

manufactured in a village in addition to prescribed facilities of earlier censuses.

In Town Directory, the statement on Slums was modified and its coverage was

enlarged by including details on all slums instead of ‘notified slums’.

(15)

6

The scope and coverage of Village Directory of 2011 DCHB has been

widened by including a number of new amenities in addition to those of 2001.

In the Town Directory, seven Statements containing the details and the data

of each town have been presented viz.; (i) Status and Growth History of towns,

(ii) Physical Aspects and Location of Towns, (iii) Civic and other Amenities, (iv)

Medical Facilities, (v) Educational, Recreational & Cultural Facilities, (vi)

Industry & Banking, and (vii) Civic & other amenities in Slums respectively.

CD Block wise data of Village Directory and Village PCA have been presented in

DCHB of 2011 census as presented in earlier census. The data of DCHB 2011

Census have been presented in two parts, Part-A contains Village and Town

Directory and Part-B contains Village and Town wise Primary Census Abstract.

Both the Parts have been published in separate volumes in 2011 Census.

(16)

7

The history begins with the partition of the Indian sub-continent; Lahore,

the historic capital of undivided Punjab, having gone to west Punjab (now in

Pakistan). The revolution for reorganization of the Punjab State started in 1950.

Thereafter need for a new capital for East Punjab arose. The First President of

India Dr. Rajendra Prasad formally declared the city open on October 7, 1953.

Hurriedly for a while the headquarters of Government of new State of East

Punjab functioned at Jalandhar. Thereafter, as make shift arrangement, Shimla

became the seat of the Government. However, that place was not suitable for a

permanent seat of Government. Its severe winter and none to comfortable

approach from the plains stood in the way of making Shimla permanent seat of

the State Government. Several claims were put and finally the present site was

chosen for the capital city due to its natural surroundings, viz. Patiali Rao on

the west, Sukhna Choe on the east, the Monsoon Rivers and Shivalik Hills on

the north-east which make for a check on the haphazard growth of the city.

Dawn of City Beautiful came up, as surrounding villages constituted into a

Union Territory on November 1, 1966. The other reasons for selecting this site

were healthy climate, fertile land for growing trees, fruits and vegetables,

plentiful supply of water and availability of building materials like stone, sand

and cement nearby. The city was named after “Chandi” (the violent form of

Goddess Durga) the Goddess of bravery. The holy shrine of Goddess “Chandi” is

located on Chandigarh-Kalka road at a distance of about 12 Kms., now in the

State of Haryana.

Initially the plan of Chandigarh was entrusted to Mr. Albert Mayor and

Whittlesey of New York, Architects and Planners. At a later stage Monsieur Le

Corbusier, a Swiss born French Architect of world fame and the chief

collaborator of U.N. Buildings at New York, was associated in this work along

with Monsieur Pierre Jeanneret, his close associate in many of his great works

of architecture and planning, Mr. Maxwell Fry, the acknowledged leader of

modern architecture in England and Miss Jane B. Drew, the best known

woman Architect in England. The present master plan of Chandigarh in

execution is the outcome of the combined efforts of these experts.

The Chandigarh city is a model of architectural grandeur, which is

displayed, in its beautiful layout and monumental buildings. Le-Corbusier’s

architectural talent is best expressed through designing of buildings for

Secretariat, Vidhan Sabha, High Court and Open Hand Monument. From the

distance the Secretariat looks like a ship, Assembly building like a pilot ship

and High Court as harbour with the Shivaliks in the backdrop. The Open Hand

Monument is a novel idea of Le-Corbusier and Pt. Jawahar Lal Nehru to depict

openness of mind, creativity, its richness and also the instincts to share this

richness with one and all. It also symbolizes blessed hand of the Almighty

bestowing peace and prosperity. The city has a variety of buildings. The houses

are specially designed to suit climatic conditions. A variety of patterns have

been evolved to give a pleasing effect.

The city has received wide acclaim as it represents the first major attempt

at planning of a complete city which will function as a self sufficient

community. The basic planning unit of the city is the Sector. Each Sector is

planned to be self-contained unit providing for residential accommodation, a

shopping center, educational and medical facilities, place of worship, open

(17)

8

space etc. The industrial area is to the east while the capitol complex is to the

north.

During the past fifty years, Independent India saw three new State

capitals built, Chandigarh for Punjab and Haryana, Bhubaneshwar for Odisha

and Gandhinagar for Gujarat. Of the three, Chandigarh is the most visible and

has attracted worldwide attention, not because it happened to be the first one

but because it was built at a delicate juncture: India had won independence but

the partition of the country led to the largest ever migration of people that the

world had ever seen. Given those uncertain days, the idea of developing a brand

new State capital for a battered Punjab was an act of profound courage; its

leaders were facing extraordinarily difficult circumstances, yet they dared to

look forward. The venture of building a new city at that point of time was an act

of faith in the country and its people.

Free India’s first Prime Minister Pt. Jawahar Lal Nehru wished that

Punjab’s new capital, “Chandigarh should be a symbol of the nation’s faith in

the future, unfettered by the traditions of the past.” While it is true that when a

new city howsoever, meticulously planned becomes a living entity, gathering its

own rhythm and momentum, certain changes inevitably occur. The felt needs

change the original design mandate and many new factors emerge that could

never have been foreseen much less provided for.

Historically, Chandigarh was conceived to serve, as the new capital of one

State, namely Punjab. At the time of birth nobody could have dreamt that

Punjab would undergo yet another division barely 20 years after its inception,

and that Chandigarh would be made to serve as the capital of two States, each

claiming exclusive rights over it. The year 1966 saw the creation of two

unilingual States, Punjab and Haryana; carved out from the previously

bilingual State. Actually the Shah Commission appointed by the Central

Government for effectuating the division of the bilingual Punjab awarded the

new city of Chandigarh to Haryana. This created a furore, and “at the epicenter

of this political change was Chandigarh, which found itself caught between

Haryana and Punjab, each State demanding the city as its own capital.” Taking

cognizance of strong sentiments, the Central Government rejected the

commission’s recommendation and, instead, made Chandigarh a “Union

Territory.” The new city was brought under its direct administration and

Chandigarh was made to serve, as the “joint capital” of both Punjab and

Haryana, and the two States “were made to share the city on a 60: 40 ratio.”

As per Memorandum of Settlements of ‘Rajiv-Longowal Punjab Accord’

during the period of Prime Minister Rajiv Gandhi the actual transfer of

Chandigarh to Punjab and areas in-lieu thereof to Haryana was to take place on

26

th

January, 1986. Later Boundary Commission ruled that 70,000 acres

should go to Haryana in-lieu of Chandigarh. The commission could identify only

45,000 acres as Hindi speaking area and was yet to identify the remaining

25,000 acres. Surjit Singh Barnala then Chief Minister of Punjab did not agree

to the Award because the area to be transferred to Haryana was Punjabi

speaking area. Under these circumstances, Chandigarh could not be

transferred to Punjab on January 26, 1986. Since then, Punjab and Haryana

became “tenant States” of the Central Government, though, ironically, neither

Punjab nor Haryana has so far paid any rent on buildings while each has been

utilising Chandigarh and its urban amenities since 1966. In the meantime both

States have also developed adjunct extensions; Punjab developed Mohali (called

(18)

9

Being immediately south of Chandigarh, Mohali could, in a sense, be

considered an extension of the original plan as conceived by Le-corbusier and

his team; it follows the same grid and sector pattern.

Planned and built northeast of Chandigarh, Panchkula is different in its

form and design pattern. Though both Mohali and Panchkula follow almost the

same planning space standards, the quality of urban services in both these

cities as compared to Chandigarh leaves much to be desired. Chandigarh is

now fast emerging as an upcoming metropolis.

As a matter of fact, the planners of Chandigarh did foresee the possibility

of haphazard development all around Chandigarh. Therefore, to protect the

peripheral areas around the new Capital City, the Punjab (new capital)

Periphery Control Act, 1952 was promulgated. This legislation aimed to

safeguard the vulnerable peripheral land around the newly planned city.

Unfortunately, “things did not happen the way they were envisaged.” This

legislation like many other laws of the land was not effectively enforced and the

result has been the emergence of several so-called “planned” townships around

the city, all in defiance of the Act. As a result, all such “development” has laid

pressure on Chandigarh’s limited urban infrastructure, besides creating traffic

congestion, environmental pollution and many other problems.

The words of President K. R. Narayanan while inaugurating the

International Conference on 50 years of Chandigarh is apt: “Chandigarh is not

a castle built in the air. The architecture of Chandigarh could not ignore the

compelling needs of Indian Society and the stubborn cultural values despite all

its freedom from the fetters of past traditions. There is no city planning that

could succeed in the face of our society, habits of our people, lapses of

administration and lack of education and health. All said and done, Chandigarh

is still the best city and is the cynosure of all eyes.”

(19)

10

Administrative Setup

Chandigarh is a uni-district and uni-tahsil territory. Development in

Chandigarh has seen many folds. The area constituted was part of the erstwhile

Punjab State. Before formation, Chandigarh then fell in the Kharar tahsil of

Ambala district. District headquarters were located in Ambala city and the

related tahsil office was at Kharar.

The construction of capital city of joint Punjab started in early 50s. The

city Chandigarh was declared a Union Territory in the year 1966 with joint

capital of both the states of Punjab and Haryana. Urban segment is expanding

ever since its formation in 1966. Since 1971 urbanization had great impact on

the city. In 1981 Census, two more Census Towns i.e. Burail and Attawa were

added to the existing two towns, Chandigarh and Mani Majra NAC. In 1991

Census, one more Census Town was added known as Mani Majra (Rural). Thus

number of towns was five in 1991.

But in 2001 Census all the three Census towns got merged with the core

town of Chandigarh. In 2001 there were 20 Wards as per notification. However

the administrative control of Chandigarh Union Territory lies with the

Chandigarh Administration. The Governor of Punjab State runs the

Administration with the help of Home Secretary, the Finance Secretary and the

Deputy Commissioner, Chandigarh. During 2001 Census rural area comprised

of 24 villages. As per revenue record four villages namely Jhumaroo, Nizampur

Burail, Nizampur Kumbra and Chahar-Tarf-Burail were uninhabited villages.

But practically the only village Chahar-Tarf-Burail was uninhabited as the

population is still living in all these villages. The Tahsildar Revenue is the

incharge of the rural area of the uni-Tahsil of Chandigarh Union Territory who

works under the direct control of Deputy Commissioner. As stated in beginning

of the para, Mani Majra (Rural) which had been declared as the Census Town in

1991 was partly merged with Statutory Town of Chandigarh in 2001 and

remaining was considered as village Mani Majra (Rural). In 2001 Mani Majra

(Rural) comprised of two hamlets of Kishangarh and Bhagwanpura. In 2011

Census Mani Majra Rural was considered as Census Town named as Mani

Majra (R) Basti Kishangarh and Basti Bhagwanpura.

Like District and Tahsil, there is only one C D Block of Chandigarh Union

Territory, which comprises of 5 villages. The Census of India 2011 in

Chandigarh district had covered 1 statutory town (including 2 OGs), 5 census

towns and 5 villages. There was an increase of 5 census towns as compared to

Census 2001. The Administrative set up during 2001 and 2011 of Chandigarh,

which has lead from 1 town (Statutory Town) to 6 towns (1 Statutory Town & 5

Census Towns) with the decline from 24 villages to 5 villages in 2011.

As per Census 2011, an area of 109.53 sq. km. is urban and 4.47 sq. km.

is rural. Chandigarh is very near to be declared entirely urban city. The city has

developed in almost all areas to maintain valuable sign of the city. On the rural

side development is visible from merger of 12 villages inurbanized part. With the

pace of urbanization, along with infrastructure development, availability of basic

(20)

11

2001 2011

Districts Sub-districts

No. of Towns Villages Districts

Sub-districts

No. of Towns Villages

Statutory Towns Census Towns Statutory Towns Census Towns 1 1 1 0 24 1 1 1 5 5

---

(21)

12

District Highlights - 2011 Census

Chandigarh is a uni-district and uni-tahsil territory and came into

existence on 1

st

November, 1966.

It has an area of 114.0 sq. km. Urban area is spread over 109.53 sq. km.

and total rural area in Chandigarh is 4.47 sq. km. as per 2011 Census.

During the second Census of the millennium, total population of

Chandigarh has crossed one million.

Chandigarh is the second densely populated (9,258) which is next to NCT

of Delhi (11,320).

Decadal percentage change in rural is – 68.5 indicating a good sign of

urbanization, which is highest as compared to states where decadal

percentage change in rural has rolled down.

97.3 % of the total population of Chandigarh lives in urban part of the

city. Rural is left with only 2.7 % of the total population.

Sex ratio of Chandigarh in 2011 is 818, a noticeable increase by 41

points as compared to 2001.

Sex ratio of child population in the age group 0-6 years has increased by

35 points from 845 to 880 in 2011 as compared to 2001.

Literacy rate in Chandigarh is 86.0 % and is slightly better as compared

to neighboring States. As per 2011 Census, literacy rate by sex and

gender gap in Chandigarh is 8.8 which have declined at slow pace during

the decade 2001-2011.

Work participation rate for the Chandigarh works out to 38.3 %.

Percentage of Main workers among the total workers (persons) during 2011

Census is 95.5 %.

Percentage of female main workers among the total workers (females) is

during 2011 Census is 90.5 % which is highest among all the States.

(22)

Number of Villages

Total

5 5

Inhabited

5 5

Uninhabited

-

-Number of Towns

Statutory

1 1

Census

5 5

Total

6 6

Number of Households

Normal

239,656 239,656

Institutional

649 649

Houseless

868 868

Population

Total

Persons

1,055,450 1,055,450

Males

580,663 580,663

Females

474,787 474,787

Rural

Persons

28,991 28,991

Males

17,150 17,150

Females

11,841 11,841

Urban Persons

1,026,459 1,026,459

Males

563,513 563,513

Females

462,946 462,946

Percentage Urban Population

97.25 97.25

Number

Percentage

Number Percentage

Persons

154,815 17.19 154,815 17.19

Males

73,725 14.54 73,725 14.54

Females

81,090 20.60 81,090 20.60

Area (in sq Km.)

114.00 114.00

9258 9258

Sex Ratio

Total

818 818

(Number of females per 1000 males)

Rural

690 690

Urban

822 822

District

Decadal Population Growth

2001-2011

Density of Population

(Persons per sq Km.)

State

(23)

District

Important Statistics

State

Number

Percentage

Number Percentage

Literates

Persons

805,438 86.05 805,438 86.05

Males

465,346 89.99 465,346 89.99

Females

340,092 81.19 340,092 81.19

Scheduled Castes

Persons

199,086 18.86 199,086 18.86

Males

106,356 18.32 106,356 18.32

Females

92,730 19.53 92,730 19.53

Scheduled Tribes

Persons

- 0.00 - 0.00

Males

- 0.00 - 0.00

Females

- 0.00 - 0.00

Workers and Non-Workers

Persons

404,136 38.29 404,136 38.29

Males

328,159 56.51 328,159 56.51

Females

75,977 16.00 75,977 16.00

(i) Main Workers

Persons

385,929 36.57 385,929 36.57

Males

317,190 54.63 317,190 54.63

Females

68,739 14.48 68,739 14.48

(ii) Marginal Workers

Persons

18,207 1.73 18,207 1.73

Males

10,969 1.89 10,969 1.89

Females

7,238 1.52 7,238 1.52

Non-Workers

Persons

651,314 61.71 651,314 61.71

Males

252,504 43.49 252,504 43.49

Females

398,810 84.00 398,810 84.00

(i) Cultivators

Persons

2,578 0.64 2,578 0.64

Males

2,114 0.64 2,114 0.64

Females

464 0.61 464 0.61

(ii)Agricultural Labourers

Persons

1,687 0.42 1,687 0.42

Males

1,375 0.42 1,375 0.42

Females

312 0.41 312 0.41

Persons

4,799 1.19 4,799 1.19

Males

3,487 1.06 3,487 1.06

Females

1,312 1.73 1,312 1.73

(iv) Other Workers

Persons

395,072 97.76 395,072 97.76

Males

321,183 97.87 321,183 97.87

Females

73,889 97.25 73,889 97.25

Total Workers (Main and

Marginal)

Category of Workers (Main & Marginal)

(iii)Workers in

household industry

(24)

Section - I

(25)
(26)

17

Introduction:

The Indian Census has the reputation of being one of the best in the world

.

The first

Census in India was conducted in the year 1872. This was conducted at different points of

time in different parts of the country. In 1881 a Census was taken for the entire country

simultaneously. Since then, Census has been conducted every ten years, without a break.

Thus, the Census of India 2011 was the fifteenth in this unbroken series since 1872, the

seventh after independence and the second census of the third millennium and twenty

first century. The census has been uninterruptedly continued despite several adversities

like wars, epidemics, natural calamities, political unrest, etc.

The Census of India is conducted under the provisions of the Census Act 1948 and

the Census Rules, 1990. In Censuses until 1931, a synchronous de-facto method was

adopted wherein the Census was conducted throughout the country on a single night.

This being a very costly affair and involved the deployment of very large force at one point

of time was given up in 1941. Since then the same methodology has been followed in all

the Censuses. It is a gigantic operation and considered to be the single largest, complex,

peace time administrative exercise in the world.

The Census Operation in India is carried out in two distinct but inter connected

phases - the House listing and Housing Census followed by the Population Enumeration.

During the first phase of Census 2011 i.e., House listing and Housing Census, the

buildings, census houses and households were identified and systematically listed in the

House Listing and Housing Census Schedule during the period April to September, 2010

in different States/Union Territories. Apart from listing of houses, some useful data on the

amenities available to the households was also collected for assessing condition of human

settlements, housing deficits etc.

Censuses prior to Census 2001 had the system of collecting the information

through Individual Slip which was a key schedule for every individual. The information

collected through slip was then compiled for a household. Some information was also

collected in addition to this for the household. During 2001 Census a comprehensive

Household Schedule was adopted replacing the individual slip concept. In 2011 Census

also similar household schedule was used for canvassing. The scope of demographic,

socio-economic parameters has been widened in every census.

2. Population Enumeration - Census 2011:

The field work of the second phase i.e. Population Enumeration was carried out during

February-March, 2011. One of the essential features of Population Enumeration in the

second phase was that each person was enumerated and her/his individual particulars

were collected at a well-defined point of time.

The Census moment and the reference date for the Census of India 2011 was

00:00 hours of 1st March, 2011. The enumeration was conducted from 9th February to

28

th

February, 2011 along with a revisional round from 1

st

March, 2011 to 5

th

March, 2011

synchronously all over the country except for few specific areas of the Jammu & Kashmir,

Himachal Pradesh and Uttarakhand states that remain snowbound in February. In these

locations the population enumeration was done from 11

th

September, 2010 to 30

th

September, 2010 along with a revisional round from 1

st

October, 2010 to 5

th

October,

2010. The reference date for the census in snow bound non-synchronous areas of these

states was 00.00 hours of the first day of October, 2010. In addition to the coverage during

House listing & Housing Census, the enumeration of the Houseless population was carried

out on the night of 28th February, 2011, as has been the usual practice. For the purpose

of Census, certain areas where the access of the civilian enumerators was not permissible

due to security reasons termed as ‘Special Charges’ such as the Defence and strictly

Military/Para-Military areas, including operational areas were also covered. Such areas

(27)

18

were not covered during the House listing & Housing Census. In addition to the

defence/para-military areas, Special Charges also included certain factory areas, certain

colonies, sensitive areas, scientific establishments, etc. These also formed Special Charges

as these were not accessible by the usual census enumerator.

3. Quality Assurance:

A Task Force for Quality Assurance (TFQA) functioned under the chairmanship of the RG

& CCI. Experienced officers of the different divisions of the organization i.e. Heads and

senior officers of the Census Division, Data Processing Division, Map Division,

Demography Division and Social Studies Division comprised the TFQA. The Directors of

Census Operations were co-opted as members whenever the TFQA discussed the data for

their States/Union territories. The main objective of constituting the TFQA was to subject

the data to stringent validation checks and ensure its quality before release as it was

expedient to be satisfied itself about the quality of data before putting the same in public

domain.

The Directors and their senior officers were involved at all levels with respect to the

quality and the coverage of their States/UTs. The TFQA intensively scrutinized coverage

and content parameters including edit and imputation logic. The most important aspect of

the data quality was to ensure complete coverage of all geographical areas especially for

the population enumeration phase where the data is disseminated right up to the village

level in the rural areas and the ward level in the urban areas. Thus ensuring the complete

coverage and correct geographical linkage of each enumeration block was one of the major

planks of the quality control, especially for small area population statistics. The content

was scrutinized mainly through the process of internal consistency, comparison with

similar data in the past and also through validation with likewise data if available, from

external sources. Quite often the local knowledge and perception was looked at to

understand both the existing and the new emerging trends of population distribution and

characteristics. A very comprehensive check and edit mechanism was put in place to

objectively examine the preliminary Census 2011 Population Enumeration results and

finally clear them for use. The population data was cleared only after the full possible

satisfaction of the TFQA.

The entire work relating to the data validation and scrutiny was completed by all

the States/Union territories under the overall supervision and monitoring of the Census

Division of the Office of the Registrar General, India with active cooperation and support of

the Social Studies Division, Data Processing Division, Data Dissemination Division and

Map Division.

4. Primary Census Abstract:

The Primary Census Abstract which is an important publication of 2011 Census

gives basic information on Area, Total Number of Households, Total Population, Scheduled

Castes, Scheduled Tribes Population, Population in the age group 0-6, Literates, Main

Workers and Marginal Workers classified by the four broad industrial categories, namely,

(i) Cultivators, (ii) Agricultural Labourers, (iii) Household Industry Workers, and (iv) Other

Workers and also Non-Workers. The characteristics of the Total Population include

Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes, Institutional and Houseless Population and are

presented by sex and rural-urban residence.

In 1981 census main workers were presented into four categories. As regards 1991

Census, the nine-fold industrial classification of main workers has been given in the

Primary Census Abstract. One of the important features of the Primary Census Abstract of

1991 Census was the presentation of population of the age group 0-6 which is continued

in 2001 and 2011 Census. All the children of age 6 years or less have been treated as

illiterate even if the child is going to a school and may have picked up reading and writing.

This will help the data users in better analysis and understanding of the literacy data as

(28)

19

given in the Primary Census Abstract.

5. Level of Presentation of PCA data in District Census Handbooks:

The format of Primary Census Abstract (PCA) adopted in the DCHB of 2001 Census

has been continued for 2011 Census as the data on four categories of works have been

presented similar to 2001 census. The Primary Census Abstract data in different PCAs are

presented at different levels. The level of presentation of Primary Census Abstracts in

DCHB is as under:

1. District Primary Census Abstract -District/C.D. Block/Town.

2. Primary Census Abstract for Scheduled Castes- District/C.D. Block/Town.

3. Primary Census Abstract for Scheduled Tribes -District/C.D. Block/Town.

4. Village Primary Census Abstract -C.D. Block/Village wise.

5. Urban Primary Census Abstract- Town/Ward level.

The PCA Data for villages was presented C.D. Block wise for the first time in 1991

Census. This practice is continued in 2001 and 2011 Census. The term ‘Total Population’

includes the Scheduled Castes, the Scheduled Tribes, the Institutional and the Houseless

populations. An appendix to District Primary Census Abstract has also been furnished

showing urban enumeration block-wise particulars on Total Population, the Scheduled

Castes Population and the Scheduled Tribes Population for each town.

6. Area Figures:

The area figures supplied by local revenue authorities of the district in respect of

tahsils, Police Stations and by the local bodies in respect of towns are given in square

kilometers. The area figures of the villages supplied by the Tahsildars in acres have been

converted and shown in hectares. The area figures of the C.D. Block are the total of the

village areas coming under each C.D. Block. The area figures for the district are the same

as adopted by the Surveyor General of India to maintain uniformity at the national level.

(29)
(30)

District Primary Census

(31)

DISTRICT CENSUS HANDBOOK : CHANDIGARH

DISTRICT PRIMARY

Persons Males Females Persons Males Females

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11

055 Chandigarh - District Total 114.00 2,41,173 10,55,450 5,80,663 4,74,787 1,19,434 63,536 55,898 Rural 4.47 7,140 28,991 17,150 11,841 4,270 2,282 1,988 Urban 109.53 2,34,033 10,26,459 5,63,513 4,62,946 1,15,164 61,254 53,910 0001 Chandigarh Total 8.32 23,086 93,863 55,034 38,829 13,914 7,249 6,665 Rural 4.47 7,140 28,991 17,150 11,841 4,270 2,282 1,988 Urban 3.85 15,946 64,872 37,884 26,988 9,644 4,967 4,677 800286

Lahora (OG) WARD NO.-0027 (Rural MDDS CODE:040099)

Urban NA 1,652 6,096 3,644 2,452 766 394 372

800286

Khuda Jassu (OG) WARD NO.-0028 (Rural MDDS CODE:040100)

Urban NA 781 2,919 1,778 1,141 347 188 159

040094 Khuda Alisher (CT) Urban 1.60 1,562 6,831 3,740 3,091 919 478 441

040095

Mani Majra (R), Basti Kishangarh, Basti

Bhagwanpura (CT) Urban 0.62 3,716 15,489 9,202 6,287 2,332 1,192 1,140 040096 Daria (CT) Urban 0.54 3,475 14,470 8,497 5,973 2,236 1,127 1,109 040097 Mauli Jagran (CT) Urban 0.75 2,560 10,786 6,312 4,474 1,810 959 851 040098 Behlana (CT) Urban 0.34 2,200 8,281 4,711 3,570 1,234 629 605

URBAN

800286

Chandigarh (M Corp. +

OG) Urban 105.68 2,20,520 9,70,602 5,31,051 4,39,551 1,06,633 56,869 49,764 040094 Khuda Alisher (CT) Urban 1.60 1,562 6,831 3,740 3,091 919 478 441

040095

Mani Majra (R), Basti Kishangarh, Basti

Bhagwanpura (CT) Urban 0.62 3,716 15,489 9,202 6,287 2,332 1,192 1,140 040096 Daria (CT) Urban 0.54 3,475 14,470 8,497 5,973 2,236 1,127 1,109 040097 Mauli Jagran (CT) Urban 0.75 2,560 10,786 6,312 4,474 1,810 959 851 040098 Behlana (CT) Urban 0.34 2,200 8,281 4,711 3,570 1,234 629 605 Location code number District/ CD Block/ Town Total/ Rural/ Urban Area in Square Kilometre Number of households

Total population (including institutional

and houseless population) Population in the age-group 0-6

(32)

Persons Males Females Persons Males Females Persons Males Females

12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 3 2

1,99,086

1,06,356 92,730 - - - 8,05,438 4,65,346 3,40,092 Total Chandigarh - District 4,974 2,776 2,198 - - - 19,961 12,752 7,209 Rural 1,94,112 1,03,580 90,532 - - - 7,85,477 4,52,594 3,32,883 Urban 14,664 8,103 6,561 - - - 65,654 41,702 23,952 Total Chandigarh 4,974 2,776 2,198 - - - 19,961 12,752 7,209 Rural 9,690 5,327 4,363 - - - 45,693 28,950 16,743 Urban 830 459 371 - - - 4,879 3,094 1,785 Urban

Lahora (OG) WARD NO.-0027 (Rural MDDS CODE:040099)

436

255 181 - - - 2,158 1,396 762 Urban

Khuda Jassu (OG) WARD NO.-0028 (Rural MDDS CODE:040100) 1,765

926 839 - - - 5,176 3,013 2,163 Urban Khuda Alisher (CT)

2,057

1,141 916 - - - 9,919 6,582 3,337 Urban

Mani Majra (R), Basti Kishangarh, Basti Bhagwanpura (CT) 1,590

897 693 - - - 10,183 6,474 3,709 Urban Daria (CT) 1,953

1,079 874 - - - 6,978 4,535 2,443 Urban Mauli Jagran (CT) 1,059 570 489 - - - 6,400 3,856 2,544 Urban Behlana (CT) URBAN 1,85,688 98,967 86,721 - - - 7,46,821 4,28,134 3,18,687 Urban Chandigarh (M Corp. + OG) 1,765

926 839 - - - 5,176 3,013 2,163 Urban Khuda Alisher (CT)

2,057

1,141 916 - - - 9,919 6,582 3,337 Urban

Mani Majra (R), Basti Kishangarh, Basti Bhagwanpura (CT) 1,590

897 693 - - - 10,183 6,474 3,709 Urban Daria (CT) 1,953

1,079 874 - - - 6,978 4,535 2,443 Urban Mauli Jagran (CT) 1,059

570 489 - - - 6,400 3,856 2,544 Urban Behlana (CT)

Scheduled Castes population Scheduled Tribes population Literates

Total/ Rural/ Urban District/ CD Block/ Town 23

(33)

DISTRICT CENSUS HANDBOOK : CHANDIGARH

DISTRICT PRIMARY

Persons Males Females Persons Males Females Persons Males Females

1 2 3 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29

055 Chandigarh - District Total 4,04,136 3,28,159 75,977 3,85,929 3,17,190 68,739 2,169 1,906 263 Rural 12,350 10,664 1,686 11,683 10,356 1,327 401 378 23 Urban 3,91,786 3,17,495 74,291 3,74,246 3,06,834 67,412 1,768 1,528 240 0001 Chandigarh Total 38,621 33,718 4,903 36,538 32,532 4,006 692 657 35 Rural 12,350 10,664 1,686 11,683 10,356 1,327 401 378 23 Urban 26,271 23,054 3,217 24,855 22,176 2,679 291 279 12 800286

Lahora (OG) WARD NO.-0027 (Rural MDDS CODE:040099)

Urban 2,620 2,261 359 2,292 2,040 252 80 78 2

800286

Khuda Jassu (OG) WARD NO.-0028 (Rural MDDS CODE:040100)

Urban 1,307 1,113 194 1,273 1,088 185 52 52

-040094 Khuda Alisher (CT) Urban 2,373 2,017 356 2,192 1,945 247 85 82 3

040095

Mani Majra (R), Basti Kishangarh, Basti

Bhagwanpura (CT) Urban 6,911 5,872 1,039 6,444 5,552 892 21 20 1 040096 Daria (CT) Urban 5,681 5,238 443 5,584 5,185 399 21 19 2 040097 Mauli Jagran (CT) Urban 4,295 3,801 494 4,104 3,667 437 19 15 4 040098 Behlana (CT) Urban 3,084 2,752 332 2,966 2,699 267 13 13

-URBAN

800286

Chandigarh (M Corp.

+ OG) Urban 3,69,442 2,97,815 71,627 3,52,956 2,87,786 65,170 1,609 1,379 230 040094 Khuda Alisher (CT) Urban 2,373 2,017 356 2,192 1,945 247 85 82 3

040095

Mani Majra (R), Basti Kishangarh, Basti

Bhagwanpura (CT) Urban 6,911 5,872 1,039 6,444 5,552 892 21 20 1 040096 Daria (CT) Urban 5,681 5,238 443 5,584 5,185 399 21 19 2 040097 Mauli Jagran (CT) Urban 4,295 3,801 494 4,104 3,667 437 19 15 4 040098 Behlana (CT) Urban 3,084 2,752 332 2,966 2,699 267 13 13 -Cultivators District/ CD Block/ Town Total/ Rural/ Urban

Total workers Main workers

Industrial category Location

code number

(34)

Persons Males Females Persons Males Females Persons Males Females

30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 3 2

1,396

1,166 230 4,219 3,278 941 3,78,145 3,10,840 67,305 Total Chandigarh - District 138 113 25 105 74 31 11,039 9,791 1,248 Rural 1,258 1,053 205 4,114 3,204 910 3,67,106 3,01,049 66,057 Urban 320 263 57 336 244 92 35,190 31,368 3,822 Total Chandigarh 138 113 25 105 74 31 11,039 9,791 1,248 Rural 182 150 32 231 170 61 24,151 21,577 2,574 Urban 29 25 4 29 18 11 2,154 1,919 235 Urban

Lahora (OG) WARD NO.-0027 (Rural MDDS CODE:040099)

2

2 - 8 5 3 1,211 1,029 182 Urban

Khuda Jassu (OG) WARD NO.-0028 (Rural MDDS CODE:040100) 12

11 1 16 11 5 2,079 1,841 238 Urban Khuda Alisher (CT)

89

65 24 79 54 25 6,255 5,413 842 Urban

Mani Majra (R), Basti Kishangarh, Basti Bhagwanpura (CT) 21

20 1 24 16 8 5,518 5,130 388 Urban Daria (CT) 8

8 - 56 54 2 4,021 3,590 431 Urban Mauli Jagran (CT) 21 19 2 19 12 7 2,913 2,655 258 Urban Behlana (CT) URBAN 1,107 930 177 3,920 3,057 863 3,46,320 2,82,420 63,900 Urban Chandigarh (M Corp. + OG) 12

11 1 16 11 5 2,079 1,841 238 Urban Khuda Alisher (CT)

89

65 24 79 54 25 6,255 5,413 842 Urban

Mani Majra (R), Basti Kishangarh, Basti Bhagwanpura (CT) 21

20 1 24 16 8 5,518 5,130 388 Urban Daria (CT) 8

8 - 56 54 2 4,021 3,590 431 Urban Mauli Jagran (CT) 21

19 2 19 12 7 2,913 2,655 258 Urban Behlana (CT)

Agricultural labourers Household industry workers Other workers

Total/ Rural/ Urban District/ CD Block/ Town of main workers 25

References

Related documents

Adapting PB Approaches to Object-based Task Model The starting point for our solution to this problem are the observations that the bead is the smallest non-preemptible unit in

In accordance with the terms of the Collective Agreement: Redundancy Payments to Public Servants dated 28 June 2012 as detailed above, it is a specific condition of that VER

Thirdly, that rapid classification of transients is essential in order to distill the incoming event stream down to a manageable number of interesting events worthy of the expenditure

Steer-by-Wire System 19 concept the authors have used a scaled version of an experimental vehicle equipped with electric drive that provide independent torque for each wheel and

ties, their population and the main type of activity of population, the industrial structure, education and income, the workplace structure, the size and structure

 Once you are proficient in fit testing techniques, you will be able to fit test several people at once using multiple fit test enclosures and one set of nebulizers and test

Aeyels [2] stated that delay coordinates are injective for generic flows and a fixed observation function. In the context of applications, stronger theorems would be desirable as

These include residential programs (Ontario Ministry of Community and Social Services, 2012), day services (Manitoba Family Services and Labour, n.d.-a), and home and other as-