• No results found

Bis(3 formyl 4 hydr­­oxy 5 meth­oxy­phen­yl)methane

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2020

Share "Bis(3 formyl 4 hydr­­oxy 5 meth­oxy­phen­yl)methane"

Copied!
8
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

organic papers

Acta Cryst.(2006). E62, o239–o240 doi:10.1107/S1600536805041334 Odabas¸og˘luet al. C

17H16O6

o239

Acta Crystallographica Section E Structure Reports

Online

ISSN 1600-5368

Bis(3-formyl-4-hydroxy-5-methoxyphenyl)-methane

Mustafa Odabas¸og˘lu,a* C¸ig˘dem Albayrakaand Orhan Bu¨yu¨kgu¨ngo¨rb

aDepartment of Chemistry, Faculty of Arts and

Science, Ondokuz Mayıs University, TR-55139 Kurupelit Samsun, Turkey, andbDepartment of

Physics, Ondokuz Mayıs University, TR-55139 Kurupelit Samsun, Turkey

Correspondence e-mail: muodabas@omu.edu.tr

Key indicators

Single-crystal X-ray study T= 296 K

Mean(C–C) = 0.003 A˚ Rfactor = 0.046 wRfactor = 0.109

Data-to-parameter ratio = 13.4

For details of how these key indicators were automatically derived from the article, see http://journals.iucr.org/e.

#2006 International Union of Crystallography Printed in Great Britain – all rights reserved

In the title compound, C17H16O3, the asymmetric unit contains

one half-molecule; a twofold rotation axis bisects the

molecule. The structure is stabilized by O—H N

intra-molecular hydrogen bonds and C—H and –

inter-molecular interactions.

Comment

Hydroxy-substituted benzaldehyde reagents used for

condensation with primary amines, hydrazines, hydroxylamine and other primary amine derivatives afford imine derivatives which can function as ligands towards a number of metal cations (Loudon, 2002; Khandar & Nejati, 2000; Khandar & Rezvani, 1999).

The asymmetric unit of the title compound, (I), contains one half-molecule; a twofold rotation axis passes through C9 (Fig. 1). The bond lengths and angles (Table 1) are in normal ranges (Allenet al., 1987).

In (I), molecules have strong intramolecular O—H O

hydrogen bonds (Table 2) and they are linked through C8—

H8a Cg1 (Cg1 is the centroid of the C1–C6 ring) and

Cg1 Cg1 intermolecular interactions (Fig. 2). For the C8—

[image:1.610.219.436.536.707.2]

Received 25 November 2005 Accepted 9 December 2005 Online 14 December 2005

Figure 1

The molecular structure of (I), with the atomic numbering scheme. Displacement ellipsoids are drawn at the 50% probalitity level. The intramolecular hydrogen bonds are shown as dashed lines. [Symmetry code: (i) 1x,y,1

(2)

H8a Cg1 contact, the distance between atom H8aand the aromatic ring centroid is 3.01 (3) A˚ (symmetry code: 1 x,

1 y, z). There is also – stacking between adjacent

molecules at (x, y, z) and (x, y, 1

2 z), with distances of

3.608 (16) A˚ between the rings centroids and perpendicular distances of 2.481 (16) A˚ between the rings.

Experimental

A mixture of o-vanillin (0.1 mol) and formaldehyde (0.1 mol) was stirred at 393 K for 2 h. The solution was added to boiling ethyl alcohol and stirred at 393 K for 20 min and cooled to room temperature. The precipitate was filtered off and recrystallized from ethyl alcohol by slow evaporation (yield 1.58 g, 10%, m.p. 424– 426 K).

Crystal data

C17H16O6

Mr= 316.30

Monoclinic,C2=c a= 14.960 (3) A˚ b= 8.2889 (11) A˚ c= 13.249 (3) A˚

= 115.015 (15)

V= 1488.8 (5) A˚3

Z= 4

Dx= 1.411 Mg m

3

MoKradiation Cell parameters from 3016

reflections

= 2.9–27.5

= 0.11 mm1

T= 296 (2) K Plate, yellow

0.400.240.07 mm

Data collection

Stoe IPDS-II diffractometer

!scans

Absorption correction: integration (X-RED32; Stoe & Cie, 2002) Tmin= 0.963,Tmax= 0.993

6042 measured reflections 1470 independent reflections

828 reflections withI> 2(I) Rint= 0.065

max= 26.0

h=18!18 k=10!10 l=16!16

Refinement onF2 R[F2> 2(F2)] = 0.046

wR(F2) = 0.109 S= 1.00 1470 reflections 110 parameters

H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement

w= 1/[2(F

o2) + (0.049P)2]

whereP= (Fo2+ 2Fc2)/3

(/)max< 0.001

max= 0.12 e A˚

3

min=0.11 e A˚

3

Table 1

Selected geometric parameters (A˚ ,). C1—C2 1.388 (3) C1—C6 1.399 (3) C2—O2 1.360 (2) C2—C3 1.395 (3)

C3—C4 1.381 (3) C4—C5 1.400 (3) C5—C6 1.368 (3) C7—O1 1.219 (3)

C2—C1—C7 120.9 (2) O2—C2—C3 118.0 (2)

O3—C3—C4 124.8 (2) C5—C9—C5i

113.6 (3)

C6—C1—C7—O1 176.1 (2) C6—C5—C9—C5i

72.25 (18)

C4—C5—C9—C5i

108.23 (19) C4—C3—O3—C8 1.6 (3) Symmetry code: (i)xþ1;y;zþ1

2.

Table 2

Hydrogen-bond geometry (A˚ ,).

D—H A D—H H A D A D—H A

O2—H2 O1 0.82 1.94 2.648 (3) 145

Atom H9, attached to C9, was located in a difference map and refined isotropically [C—H = 0.98 (2) A˚ ]. The remaining H atoms were positioned geometrically [0.82 (OH), 0.93 (CH) and 0.96 A˚ (CH3)] and constrained to ride on their parent atoms withUiso(H) values of 1.5 (1.2 for methine) timesUeq(C,O).

Data collection: X-AREA (Stoe & Cie, 2002); cell refinement:

X-AREA; data reduction: X-RED32; program(s) used to solve structure:SHELXS97(Sheldrick, 1997); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 1997); molecular graphics:

ORTEP3 for Windows (Farrugia, 1997); software used to prepare material for publication:WinGX(Farrugia, 1999).

References

Allen, F. H., Kennard, O., Watson, D. G., Brammer, L., Orpen, A. G., & Taylor, R. (1987).J. Chem. Soc. Perkin Trans. 2, pp S1–19.

Farrugia, L. J. (1997).J. Appl. Cryst.30, 565. Farrugia, L. J. (1999).J. Appl. Cryst.32, 837–838.

Khandar, A. A. & Nejati, K. (2000).Polyhedron,19, 607–613. Khandar, A. A. & Rezvani, Z. (1999).Polyhedron,18, 129–133.

Loudon, M. G. (2002).Organic Chemistry, , 4th ed., p. 837. Oxford University Press.

Sheldrick, G. M. (1997). SHELXS97 and SHELXL97. University of Go¨ttingen, Germany.

[image:2.610.74.271.71.294.2]

Stoe & Cie (2002).X-AREA(Version 1.18) andX-RED32(Version 1.04). Stoe & Cie, Darmstadt, Germany.

Figure 2

(3)

supporting information

sup-1

Acta Cryst. (2006). E62, o239–o240

supporting information

Acta Cryst. (2006). E62, o239–o240 [doi:10.1107/S1600536805041334]

Bis(3-formyl-4-hydroxy-5-methoxyphenyl)methane

Mustafa Odabaşoğlu, Çiğdem Albayrak and Orhan Büyükgüngör

S1. Comment

Hydroxy-substituted benzaldehyde reagents used for condensation with primary amines, hydrazines, hydroxylamine and

other primary amine derivatives afford imine derivatives which can function as ligands towards a number of metal cations

(Khandar & Nejati, 2000; Khandar & Rezvani, 1999).

The asymmetric unit of the title compound, (I), contains one-half molecule (Fig. 1). The bond lengths and angles (Table

1) are in normal ranges (Allen et al.,1987).

In (I), molecules have strong intramolecular O—H···O hydrogen bonds (Table 2) and they are linked through C8—

H8a···Cg1 (Cg1 is the centroid of the C1–C6 ring) and Cg1···Cg1 intermolecular interactions (Fig. 2). For the C8—

H8a···Cg1 contact, the distance between atom H8a and the aromatic ring centroid is 3.01 (3) Å (symmetry code: 1 − x, 1

y, −z). There is also ππ stacking between adjacent molecules at (−x, y, 1/2 − z), with distances of 3.608 (16) between

the rings centroids and a and perpendicular distance of 2.481 (16) Å between the rings.

S2. Experimental

A mixture of o-vanilline (0.1 mol) and formaldehyde (0.1 mol) was stirred at 393 K for 2 h. The solution was added to the

boiling ethyl alcohol and stirred at 393 K for 20 min and cooled to room temperature. The precipitate was filtered off and

recrystallized from ethyl alcohol by slow evaporation (yield 1.58 g, 10%, m.p. 424–426 K).

S3. Refinement

Atom H9 was located in a difference map and refined isotropically [C—H = 0.98 (2) Å]. The remaining H atoms were

positioned geometrically [0.82 (OH), 0.93 (CH) and 0.96 Å (CH3)] and constrained to ride on their parent atoms with

(4)
[image:4.610.123.487.77.376.2]

Figure 1

The molecular structure of (I), with the atomic numbering scheme. Displacement ellipsoids are drawn at the 50%

(5)

supporting information

sup-3

[image:5.610.126.481.72.474.2]

Acta Cryst. (2006). E62, o239–o240 Figure 2

A packing diagram of (I) with the C—H···π and ππ intermolecular interactions shown as dashed lines.

Bis(3-formyl-4-hydroxy-5-methoxyphenyl)methane

Crystal data

C17H16O6 Mr = 316.30

Monoclinic, C2/c Hall symbol: -C 2yc a = 14.960 (3) Å b = 8.2889 (11) Å c = 13.249 (3) Å β = 115.015 (15)° V = 1488.8 (5) Å3 Z = 4

F(000) = 664 Dx = 1.411 Mg m−3

Mo radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å Cell parameters from 3016 reflections θ = 2.9–27.5°

µ = 0.11 mm−1 T = 296 K Plate, yellow

(6)

Stoe IPDS-II diffractometer

Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube Plane graphite monochromator

Detector resolution: 6.67 pixels mm-1 ω scans

Absorption correction: integration (X-RED; Stoe & Cie, 2002) Tmin = 0.963, Tmax = 0.993

6042 measured reflections 1470 independent reflections 828 reflections with I > 2σ(I) Rint = 0.065

θmax = 26.0°, θmin = 2.9° h = −18→18

k = −10→10 l = −16→16

Refinement

Refinement on F2 Least-squares matrix: full R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.046 wR(F2) = 0.109 S = 1.00 1470 reflections 110 parameters 0 restraints

Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods

Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map

Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites

H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement

w = 1/[σ2(F

o2) + (0.049P)2] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3 (Δ/σ)max < 0.001

Δρmax = 0.12 e Å−3 Δρmin = −0.11 e Å−3

Special details

Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full

covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.

Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2,

conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2)

x y z Uiso*/Ueq

(7)

supporting information

sup-5

Acta Cryst. (2006). E62, o239–o240

O1 0.85964 (13) 0.6153 (2) 0.47781 (18) 0.0999 (7) O2 0.77382 (12) 0.5455 (2) 0.61102 (14) 0.0774 (6) H2 0.8151 0.5887 0.5944 0.116* O3 0.63516 (12) 0.3852 (2) 0.63842 (13) 0.0755 (5) H9 0.5368 (17) 0.111 (3) 0.221 (2) 0.081 (8)*

Atomic displacement parameters (Å2)

U11 U22 U33 U12 U13 U23

C1 0.0436 (11) 0.0583 (14) 0.0675 (15) 0.0026 (10) 0.0168 (10) 0.0136 (12) C2 0.0383 (10) 0.0496 (12) 0.0657 (15) 0.0016 (9) 0.0052 (10) −0.0012 (11) C3 0.0463 (11) 0.0598 (13) 0.0477 (12) 0.0058 (10) 0.0140 (9) 0.0005 (10) C4 0.0390 (10) 0.0568 (13) 0.0565 (13) −0.0011 (9) 0.0147 (10) 0.0047 (11) C5 0.0427 (10) 0.0498 (12) 0.0502 (13) 0.0056 (9) 0.0119 (9) 0.0070 (10) C6 0.0516 (12) 0.0657 (15) 0.0553 (13) 0.0051 (11) 0.0199 (10) 0.0092 (11) C7 0.0499 (14) 0.0795 (18) 0.098 (2) −0.0012 (12) 0.0242 (14) 0.0246 (16) C8 0.0811 (16) 0.0969 (19) 0.0712 (17) −0.0058 (15) 0.0389 (14) 0.0012 (15) C9 0.0597 (19) 0.053 (2) 0.0543 (19) 0.000 0.0114 (16) 0.000 O1 0.0593 (10) 0.0937 (14) 0.1302 (17) −0.0221 (10) 0.0239 (11) 0.0181 (13) O2 0.0574 (9) 0.0699 (11) 0.0835 (11) −0.0114 (8) 0.0090 (8) −0.0117 (9) O3 0.0685 (10) 0.0971 (13) 0.0632 (11) −0.0187 (9) 0.0299 (8) −0.0153 (9)

Geometric parameters (Å, º)

C1—C2 1.388 (3) C6—H6 0.9300 C1—C6 1.399 (3) C7—O1 1.219 (3) C1—C7 1.454 (3) C7—H7 0.9300 C2—O2 1.360 (2) C8—O3 1.417 (3) C2—C3 1.395 (3) C8—H8A 0.9600 C3—O3 1.365 (3) C8—H8B 0.9600 C3—C4 1.381 (3) C8—H8C 0.9600 C4—C5 1.400 (3) C9—C5i 1.514 (3) C4—H4 0.9300 C9—H9 0.98 (2) C5—C6 1.368 (3) O2—H2 0.8200 C5—C9 1.514 (3)

(8)

C6—C5—C9 121.26 (19) C5i—C9—H9 109.2 (14) C4—C5—C9 120.44 (17) C2—O2—H2 109.5 C5—C6—C1 121.6 (2) C3—O3—C8 117.75 (18)

C6—C1—C2—O2 178.34 (18) C3—C4—C5—C9 178.3 (2) C7—C1—C2—O2 0.6 (3) C4—C5—C6—C1 0.0 (3) C6—C1—C2—C3 −0.7 (3) C9—C5—C6—C1 −179.6 (2) C7—C1—C2—C3 −178.5 (2) C2—C1—C6—C5 1.0 (3) O2—C2—C3—O3 −1.5 (3) C7—C1—C6—C5 178.8 (2) C1—C2—C3—O3 177.60 (19) C2—C1—C7—O1 1.6 (4) O2—C2—C3—C4 −179.63 (19) C6—C1—C7—O1 −176.1 (2) C1—C2—C3—C4 −0.5 (3) C6—C5—C9—C5i −72.25 (18) O3—C3—C4—C5 −176.39 (19) C4—C5—C9—C5i 108.23 (19) C2—C3—C4—C5 1.5 (3) C4—C3—O3—C8 −1.6 (3) C3—C4—C5—C6 −1.2 (3) C2—C3—O3—C8 −179.6 (2)

Symmetry code: (i) −x+1, y, −z+1/2.

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º)

D—H···A D—H H···A D···A D—H···A

Figure

Figure 1The molecular structure of (I), with the atomic numbering scheme.
Figure 2
Figure 1
Figure 2

References

Related documents

The notable antifungal effect of certain compounds confirms that these are a good basis for the production of a number of new, possibly physiologically 1, 4-

The N-Mannich bases of isatin derivatives were synthesized by condensing the Schiff base of isatin derivative with formaldehyde and various secondary amines (Scheme 1).. The

Research Article SYNTHESIS, CHARACTERISATION AND ANTICANCER ACTIVITY OF SCHIFF BASE DERIVATIVES OF 5-2-PHENOXYPYRIDIN-3-YL-1, 3, 4-THIADIAZOL-2-AMINE Adimule Vinayak1, Medapa

Bis-(4-hydroxycoumarin-3-yl) methane derivatives 3(a-l) were synthesized from 4-hydroxycoumarin and substi- tuted aromatic aldehydes using succinimide-N-sulfonic acid as catalyst

ABSTRACT: A linear strategy was adopted in synthesizing the novel amine derivatives 7(a-h) of 5-[5- (chloromethyl)-1, 3, 4-oxadiazol-2-yl]-2-(4-fluorophenyl)-pyridine (6)

Comparison of the antiplatelet activity of the most interesting derivatives described in this paper with values determined for some reference drugs (milrinone or sulfinpyrazone)