UC Berkeley Math Prelim Workshop
Real Analysis
James Rowan
August 12, 2020
Roadmap
1. Real analysis
1.1 Intermediate and mean value theorems 1.2 Sequences of real numbers
1.3 Taylor’s formula (with remainder) 1.4 Multivariable generalizations
Functions from R to R
There are two major new properties in real analysis beyond basic metric space topology that can come in handy
I The ordering of the real numbers
I Completeness: every Cauchy sequence converges The ordering gives a couple of useful theorems
1. Intermediate value theorem
2. Mean value theorem (and various other versions such as the integral or Cauchy versions)
Functions from R to R
There are two major new properties in real analysis beyond basic metric space topology that can come in handy
I The ordering of the real numbers
I Completeness: every Cauchy sequence converges
The ordering gives a couple of useful theorems 1. Intermediate value theorem
2. Mean value theorem (and various other versions such as the integral or Cauchy versions)
Functions from R to R
There are two major new properties in real analysis beyond basic metric space topology that can come in handy
I The ordering of the real numbers
I Completeness: every Cauchy sequence converges The ordering gives a couple of useful theorems
1. Intermediate value theorem
2. Mean value theorem (and various other versions such as the integral or Cauchy versions)
Functions from R to R
There are two major new properties in real analysis beyond basic metric space topology that can come in handy
I The ordering of the real numbers
I Completeness: every Cauchy sequence converges The ordering gives a couple of useful theorems
1. Intermediate value theorem
2. Mean value theorem (and various other versions such as the integral or Cauchy versions)
1.1.10 – Fall 1982 11
1. Prove that there is no continuous map from the closed interval [0, 1] onto the open interval (0, 1).
2. Find a continuous surjective map from the open interval (0, 1) onto the closed interval [0, 1].
3. Prove that no map in Part 2 can be bijective.
1.5.3 – Fall 1990 4 Suppose f is a continuous real valued function. Show that
Z 1 0
f (x )x2dx = 1 3f (ξ) for some ξ ∈ [0, 1].
Inequalities
Some key inequalities to know I Cauchy-Schwarz:
If f and g are two continuous, complex-valued functions on [a, b], then
Z b a
f gdx ≤ Z b
a
|f |2dx
!1/2
Z b a
|g|2dx
!1/2
,
with equality if and only if f = λg for some λ.
Note that there is also a version for finite and infinite sums I Jensen’s inequality:
If f is a convex function, then f x1+x2
2
≤ f (x1) +f (x2)
2 .
Inequalities
Some key inequalities to know I Cauchy-Schwarz:
If f and g are two continuous, complex-valued functions on [a, b], then
Z b a
f gdx ≤ Z b
a
|f |2dx
!1/2
Z b a
|g|2dx
!1/2
,
with equality if and only if f = λg for some λ.
Note that there is also a version for finite and infinite sums I Jensen’s inequality:
If f is a convex function, then f x1+x2
2
≤ f (x1) +f (x2)
2 .
Inequalities
Some key inequalities to know I Cauchy-Schwarz:
If f and g are two continuous, complex-valued functions on [a, b], then
Z b a
f gdx ≤ Z b
a
|f |2dx
!1/2
Z b a
|g|2dx
!1/2
,
with equality if and only if f = λg for some λ.
Note that there is also a version for finite and infinite sums
I Jensen’s inequality:
If f is a convex function, then f x1+x2
2
≤ f (x1) +f (x2)
2 .
Inequalities
Some key inequalities to know I Cauchy-Schwarz:
If f and g are two continuous, complex-valued functions on [a, b], then
Z b a
f gdx ≤ Z b
a
|f |2dx
!1/2
Z b a
|g|2dx
!1/2
,
with equality if and only if f = λg for some λ.
Note that there is also a version for finite and infinite sums I Jensen’s inequality:
If f is a convex function, then f x1+x2
2
≤ f (x1) +f (x2)
2 .
Inequalities
Some key inequalities to know I Cauchy-Schwarz:
If f and g are two continuous, complex-valued functions on [a, b], then
Z b a
f gdx ≤ Z b
a
|f |2dx
!1/2
Z b a
|g|2dx
!1/2
,
with equality if and only if f = λg for some λ.
Note that there is also a version for finite and infinite sums I Jensen’s inequality:
If f is a convex function, then f x1+x2
2
≤ f (x1) +f (x2)
2 .
1.5.9 – Fall 1985 15 Let 0 ≤ a ≤ 1 be given. Determine all nonnegative continuous functions f on [0, 1] which satisfy the following three conditions:
Z 1 0
f (x ) dx = 1,
Z 1 0
xf (x ) dx = a,
Z 1 0
x2f (x ) dx = a2.
Sequences of real numbers
I Any monotonic, bounded sequence converges
I Any Cauchy sequence converges (the converse is true in any metric space)
I We can also look at the lim sup and lim inf of a sequence of real numbers; if these are equal, then the sequence
converges.
Sequences of real numbers
I Any monotonic, bounded sequence converges
I Any Cauchy sequence converges (the converse is true in any metric space)
I We can also look at the lim sup and lim inf of a sequence of real numbers; if these are equal, then the sequence
converges.
Sequences of real numbers
I Any monotonic, bounded sequence converges
I Any Cauchy sequence converges (the converse is true in any metric space)
I We can also look at the lim sup and lim inf of a sequence of real numbers; if these are equal, then the sequence
converges.
1.3.8 – Spring 2003 6A Let xnbe a sequence of real numbers so that limn→∞2xn+1− xn=x . Show that limn→∞xn=x .
1.3.9 – Spring 2000 5 Let a and x0be positive numbers, and define the sequence (xn)∞n=1 recursively by
xn= 1 2
xn−1+ a xn−1
.
Prove that this sequence converges, and find its limit.
Taylor’s Theorem with Remainder
I How well a Taylor series approximates a smooth function can be understood quantitatively (useful for e.g. proving error bounds on approximations for integrals)
Taylor’s theorem with remainder: Let f be k times differentiable. The difference between f (x ) and its k th Taylor polynomial
f (a) + f0(a)(x − a) +1
2f00(a)(x − a)2+ · · · + 1
k !f(k )(a)(x − a)k is given by
Rk(x ) = 1
(k + 1)!f(k +1)(ξ)(x − a)k +1 for some ξ between a and x .
Taylor’s Theorem with Remainder
I How well a Taylor series approximates a smooth function can be understood quantitatively (useful for e.g. proving error bounds on approximations for integrals)
Taylor’s theorem with remainder: Let f be k times differentiable. The difference between f (x ) and its k th Taylor polynomial
f (a) + f0(a)(x − a) +1
2f00(a)(x − a)2+ · · · + 1
k !f(k )(a)(x − a)k is given by
Rk(x ) = 1
(k + 1)!f(k +1)(ξ)(x − a)k +1 for some ξ between a and x .
1.1.17 – Fall 1997 11 Let f be a C2function on the real line.
Assume f is bounded with bounded second derivative. Let A = sup
x ∈R
|f (x)|, B = sup
x ∈|R
|f00(x )|.
Prove that
sup
x ∈R
|f0(x )| ≤ 2
√ AB.
Multivariable Extensions
1. “The derivative the Jacobian” (e.g. in the inverse function theorem, dydx 6= 0 becomes det J(x) 6= 0)
2. “The second derivative the Hessian” (e.g. for convexity)
Multivariable Extensions
1. “The derivative the Jacobian” (e.g. in the inverse function theorem, dydx 6= 0 becomes det J(x) 6= 0)
2. “The second derivative the Hessian” (e.g. for convexity)
2.2.43 – Spring 1996 12 Let M2×2be the space of 2 × 2 matrices over R, identified in the usual way with R4. Let the function F from M2×2into M2×2be defined by
F (X ) = X + X2.
Prove that the range of F contains a neighborhood of the origin.
Key takeaways
I If you know that a function is a function from R to R, you might be able to exploit ordering-related properties like the IVT
I Similarly, there is additional structure to sequences of real numbers coming from the ordering properties
I Using Taylor’s theorem with remainder can give you quantitative control of how good your approximations are I Many one-variable results generalize to several variables
with appropriate modifications
Key takeaways
I If you know that a function is a function from R to R, you might be able to exploit ordering-related properties like the IVT
I Similarly, there is additional structure to sequences of real numbers coming from the ordering properties
I Using Taylor’s theorem with remainder can give you quantitative control of how good your approximations are I Many one-variable results generalize to several variables
with appropriate modifications
Key takeaways
I If you know that a function is a function from R to R, you might be able to exploit ordering-related properties like the IVT
I Similarly, there is additional structure to sequences of real numbers coming from the ordering properties
I Using Taylor’s theorem with remainder can give you quantitative control of how good your approximations are
I Many one-variable results generalize to several variables with appropriate modifications
Key takeaways
I If you know that a function is a function from R to R, you might be able to exploit ordering-related properties like the IVT
I Similarly, there is additional structure to sequences of real numbers coming from the ordering properties
I Using Taylor’s theorem with remainder can give you quantitative control of how good your approximations are I Many one-variable results generalize to several variables
with appropriate modifications