• No results found

Case Doc 4301 Filed 07/15/13 Entered 07/15/13 13:43:53 Main Document Pg 1 of 5

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Case Doc 4301 Filed 07/15/13 Entered 07/15/13 13:43:53 Main Document Pg 1 of 5"

Copied!
20
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

1 Bristol: 381911-1

IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR TH EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI

EASTERN DIVISION

In re: ) Chapter 11

) Case No. 12-51502-659 PATRIOT COAL CORPORATION, et al., ) (Jointly Administered)

)

Debtors. )

RESPONSE OF ELECTRO-MECHANICAL CORPORATION TO CLAIM OBJECTION FILED BY DEBTOR

Now comes Electro-Mechanical Corporation (“EMC”), through its undersigned counsel, and for its response to the Debtors’ Fifth Omnibus Objection to Claims (Docket # 4181) and Notice of Claim Objection issued by Patriot (collectively the “Objection”) respectfully states as follows:

1. EMC timely filed its Proof of Claim, being designated as EDMO/DCG Claim # 3675-1/1987 asserting an unsecured claim in the amount of $19,831.66 (the “Claim”). A true copy of the Claim is attached hereto as Exhibit A.

2. By filing the Claim, EMC introduced prima facie evidence that the claim is both valid and accurate. The Debtor cannot shift the burden to prove the validity of the Claim without providing evidence showing that the Claim is not accurate. Unless the Debtor successfully shifts the burden to EMC and EMC fails to satisfy the burden, the EMC Claim must prevail. In re

Nejedlo, 324 B.R. 697, 699 (Bankr. E.D. Wis. 2005).

3. The sole grounds cited in the Objection are that the priorities asserted in the Claim are inconsistent, in whole or in part, with the nature of the parties’ obligations and requirements for secured or priority status and that the amount claimed by EMC exceeds the Debtors’ Case 12-51502 Doc 4301 Filed 07/15/13 Entered 07/15/13 13:43:53 Main Document

(2)

2 Bristol: 381911-1

obligation to EMC as of July 9, 2012. The Objection seeks to reduce the amount of the Claim to $9,980.99.

4. The Objection misconstrues the nature of the Claim as the Claim asserts a general unsecured claim for amounts due to EMC by the Debtor as of July 9, 2012.

5. It is the understanding of EMC that the Debtor objects to the sum of $3,400.00 representing amounts due pursuant to Invoice # 164188 (the “Invoice”). The Invoice represents agreed upon amounts due for work performed as identified in the Field Service Report dated March 27, 2012 attached hereto as Exhibit B. EMC is advised that the Debtor does not dispute receiving the benefit of the work described in the Field Service Report and the Invoice, but asserts that it is not indebted for said sums because it has not been presented with a signed delivery form. This does not constitute a legal defense or basis to reduce the Debtor’s liability for amounts due under the Invoice as asserted in the Claim.

6. It is the further understanding of EMC that Debtor seeks a reduction in the Claim in the amount of $6,300 predicated upon said Credit Memo in said amount. However, EMC was advised by the Debtor prior to the filing of the Objection that it had corrected its records and no longer claimed a credit predicated upon the Credit Memo against amounts asserted in the Claim. In any event, the Debtor is not entitled to claim a credit of $6,300.00 against amounts asserted in the Claim.

7. EMC agrees that the Claim can be reduced by the sum of $150.67 as this amount has been previously established as a valid administrative expense claim against the Debtor pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 503(b)(9). See Claim # 142 filed on August 25, 2012. The Objection should be otherwise overruled and dismissed as the Debtor is indebted to EMC in the amount of $19,680.99 representing sums owed under the remaining invoices recited in the Claim.

Case 12-51502 Doc 4301 Filed 07/15/13 Entered 07/15/13 13:43:53 Main Document Pg 2 of 5

(3)

3 Bristol: 381911-1

8. The person authorized to reconcile, settle or otherwise resolve the claim on behalf of EMC is: Mark L. Esposito, Penn, Stuart & Eskridge, PC, PO Box 2009, Bristol, VA 24203; 423/793-4812 ([email protected]).

WHEREFORE, Electro-Mechanical Corporation respectfully requests that the Court overrule the Objection, that the Claim be amended to reduce the amount of the Claim by $150.67 to $19,680.99 and deemed allowed as a general unsecured claim together with such other and further relief as is proper and just.

Respectfully submitted, JENKINS & KLING, P.C.

By: /s/ Peter D. Kerth Peter D. Kerth # 31682 MO

150 North Meramee Avenue, Suite 400 St. Louis, MO 63105

(314) 721-2525

(314) 721-5525 (facsimile) [email protected]

Attorneys for Electro-Mechanical Corporation

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned certifies that a true and correct copy of the above and foregoing was served via electronic filing in the CM/ECF system of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court, Eastern District of Missouri upon all parties to this case requesting service by electronic filing and via facsimile transmission and United States Mail, postage prepaid, on the following parties on the 15th day of July, 2013.

Case 12-51502 Doc 4301 Filed 07/15/13 Entered 07/15/13 13:43:53 Main Document Pg 3 of 5

(4)

4 Bristol: 381911-1

Debtors:

Patriot Coal Corporation

12312 Olive Boulevard, Suite 400 St. Louis, Missouri 63141

Facsimile: (314) 275-3626

Debtor’s Notice and Claims Agent: Patriot Coal Corporation

c/o GCG, Inc. PO Box 9898

Dublin, Ohio 43017 Facsimile: (855) 687-2627 Counsel to the Debtors:

Attn: Michelle M. McGreal, Esq. Brian M. Resnick, Esq. Davis Polk & Wardwell, LLP 450 Lexington Avenue New York, New York 10017 Facsimile: (212) 607-7983 Attn: Lloyd A. Palans, Esq.

Brian C. Walsh, Esq. Bryan Cave LLP

211 North Broadway, Suite 3600 St. Louis, Missouri 63102 Facsimile: (314) 259-2020

Counsel to the Committee: Attn: Thomas Moers Mayer Adam C. Rogoff, Esq.

Gregory G. Plotko, Esq. Kramer Levin Naftalis & Fankel LLP 1177 Avenue of the Americas

New York, New York 10036 Facsimile: (212) 715-8000 Attn: Gregory D. Willard, Esq.

Angela L. Schisler, Esq.

Case 12-51502 Doc 4301 Filed 07/15/13 Entered 07/15/13 13:43:53 Main Document Pg 4 of 5

(5)

5 Bristol: 381911-1

Carmody MacDonald PC 120 South Central Avenue St. Louis, Missouri 63105-1705 Facsimile: (314) 854-8660

United States Trustee:

Office of the United States Trustee 111 South Tenth Street

Suite 6353

St. Louis, Missouri 63102 Facsimile: (314) 539-2990

/s/ Peter D. Kerth Peter D. Kerth

150 N. Meramec Avenue, Suite 400 St. Louis. MO 63105

Case 12-51502 Doc 4301 Filed 07/15/13 Entered 07/15/13 13:43:53 Main Document Pg 5 of 5

(6)

Case 1251502 Doc 43011 Filed 07/15/13 Entered 07/15/13 13:43:53 Exhibit A Proof of Claim (EDMO/DCG Claim # 3675-1/1987 Pg 1 of 14

(7)

Case 1251502 Doc 43011 Filed 07/15/13 Entered 07/15/13 13:43:53 Exhibit A Proof of Claim (EDMO/DCG Claim # 3675-1/1987 Pg 2 of 14

(8)

Case 1251502 Doc 43011 Filed 07/15/13 Entered 07/15/13 13:43:53 Exhibit A Proof of Claim (EDMO/DCG Claim # 3675-1/1987 Pg 3 of 14

(9)

Case 1251502 Doc 43011 Filed 07/15/13 Entered 07/15/13 13:43:53 Exhibit A Proof of Claim (EDMO/DCG Claim # 3675-1/1987 Pg 4 of 14

(10)

Case 1251502 Doc 43011 Filed 07/15/13 Entered 07/15/13 13:43:53 Exhibit A Proof of Claim (EDMO/DCG Claim # 3675-1/1987 Pg 5 of 14

(11)

Case 1251502 Doc 43011 Filed 07/15/13 Entered 07/15/13 13:43:53 Exhibit A Proof of Claim (EDMO/DCG Claim # 3675-1/1987 Pg 6 of 14

(12)

Case 1251502 Doc 43011 Filed 07/15/13 Entered 07/15/13 13:43:53 Exhibit A Proof of Claim (EDMO/DCG Claim # 3675-1/1987 Pg 7 of 14

(13)

Case 1251502 Doc 43011 Filed 07/15/13 Entered 07/15/13 13:43:53 Exhibit A Proof of Claim (EDMO/DCG Claim # 3675-1/1987 Pg 8 of 14

(14)

Case 1251502 Doc 43011 Filed 07/15/13 Entered 07/15/13 13:43:53 Exhibit A Proof of Claim (EDMO/DCG Claim # 3675-1/1987 Pg 9 of 14

(15)

Case 1251502 Doc 43011 Filed 07/15/13 Entered 07/15/13 13:43:53 Exhibit A Proof of Claim (EDMO/DCG Claim # 3675-1/1987 Pg 10 of 14

(16)

Case 1251502 Doc 43011 Filed 07/15/13 Entered 07/15/13 13:43:53 Exhibit A Proof of Claim (EDMO/DCG Claim # 3675-1/1987 Pg 11 of 14

(17)

Case 1251502 Doc 43011 Filed 07/15/13 Entered 07/15/13 13:43:53 Exhibit A Proof of Claim (EDMO/DCG Claim # 3675-1/1987 Pg 12 of 14

(18)

Case 1251502 Doc 43011 Filed 07/15/13 Entered 07/15/13 13:43:53 Exhibit A Proof of Claim (EDMO/DCG Claim # 3675-1/1987 Pg 13 of 14

(19)

Case 1251502 Doc 43011 Filed 07/15/13 Entered 07/15/13 13:43:53 Exhibit A Proof of Claim (EDMO/DCG Claim # 3675-1/1987 Pg 14 of 14

(20)

Case 1251502 Doc 43012 Filed 07/15/13 Entered 07/15/13 13:43:53 Exhibit B Field Service Report dated March 27 2012 Pg 1 of 1

References

Related documents

Beginning on the date of this Order and continuing through the date the Court enters a final ruling on Petitioner’s Verified Petition, all rights and remedies of any individual,

NOTE: You must attend meetings in your certification category and sign the attendance roster in order to earn points toward your Tennessee Pesticide Applicator

Pursuant to DGS’s Second Claim for Relief alleging breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing, for judgment against Lululemon in the amount of no less

(To be completed if debtor is an individual whose debts are primarily consumer debts.) I, the attorney for the petitioner named in the foregoing petition, declare that I have

Within the 180 days before the filing of my bankruptcy case, I received a briefing from a credit counseling agency approved by the United States trustee or bankruptcy administrator

briefing and then a hearing on the issue of class certification. If ultimately permitted, class members would need to be noticed and then given an opportunity to “opt out” under

In sum and as set forth in more detail below, a Verdict already entered in the State Court Action, and the only matter left to resolve in the State Court is whether there are

9 The same day, June 4, 2015, the debtor sought an 10 interim stay in the proceedings pending an appeal of the 11 State Court’s denial of his motion to dismiss for failure to 12 state