• No results found

Assessment Plan for the Master of Music Education Degree Program Goal--Graduate Program Objectives--Music Education

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Assessment Plan for the Master of Music Education Degree Program Goal--Graduate Program Objectives--Music Education"

Copied!
6
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

Assessment Plan for the Master of Music Education Degree

3-10-06

Program Goal--Graduate

Students graduating with a Master’s degree will develop advanced skills and knowledge in their area of specialization in the field of music.

Program Objectives--Music Education

Students graduating with a Master’s degree will develop

• Individual talents, interests and philosophies which can be used creatively both to preserve and extend our cultural heritage; • Professional competence in such disciplines as composition and performance interpretation, and evaluation of knowledge; • Scholarly competence in the organization , interpretation , and evaluation of knowledge

• Professional competence in the communication and dissemination of knowledge

• Potential to solve contemporary problems in various aspects of music. (source: National Association of Schools of Music Handbook. p. 100).

Student Learning Outcome Evidence Methods of Assessment Data Collection and Use

1. Students will demonstrate the advanced musical and pedagogical knowledge and research/writing skills necessary to enhance their teaching abilities in a P-16 Vocal and/or Instrumental teaching position.

Written Comprehensive Exam,

Following the completion of all required course work, the student will sit for a written exam, which consists of one question each in the areas of Music Theory, Music History, and Music Education. The exam is proctored by the chair of the student’s graduate committee.

The result is a P/F grade for each question. Students may not move on to their paper defense (oral exam) without passing the written comprehensives (direct evidence).

The exam is graded by the individual faculty members submitting the questions. Grades are given to the chair of the student’s graduate committee, who, in turn, informs the student and the Graduate Coordinator.

Schedule for data collection. • Written Comprehensive Exams

are normally taken during the last semester in residence

Who is responsible?

• Chair of the student’s graduate committee, supported by faculty who submit and grade the exam questions.

Use of Data

• Exam scores are revealed to the graduate student and the Graduate Coordinator, who validates (or nullifies) the student’s progress toward graduation. Results are used in future decision on class offerings, course content and staffing.

(2)

Student Learning Outcome Evidence Methods of Assessment Data Collection and Use

2. Students will demonstrate the advanced musical and pedagogical knowledge and research/writing/ and

communication skills necessary to solve a contemporary music education problem

Thesis/Plan B Paper/Oral Defense

Students select a graduate committee in consultation with the Graduate Coordinator. The chair of that committee assists the student in selecting and submitting a paper subject proposal to the departmental Graduate Committee, who approves or rejects the subject proposal. The final document is submitted to the student’s graduate committee, who reads the paper, makes their

suggestions, then administers a final, oral exam (defense). This is the final requirement for the Master of Music Education degree.

The result is a P/F grade (Optional Thesis: A/F). Students may not graduate without passing their written paper and oral defense.

Schedule for data collection. • Normally, final semester in

residence. (Some students return to their regular teaching jobs and complete requirements by registering as “off-campus” status)

Who is responsible?

• Chair of the student’s graduate committee, the graduate committee who reads the paper and administers the oral exam Use of Data

• Information is revealed to the graduate student and the Graduate Coordinator, who validates (or nullifies) the student’s progress toward graduation. Results are used in future decision on class offerings, course content and staffing.

(3)

Assessment Plan for the Master of Music in Performance Degree

3-10-06

Program Goal--Graduate

Students graduating with a Master’s degree will develop advanced skills and knowledge in their area of specialization in the field of music.

Program Objectives--Performance

Students graduating with a Master’s degree will develop

• Individual talents, interests and philosophies which can be used creatively both to preserve and extend our cultural heritage; • Professional competence in such disciplines as composition and performance interpretation, and evaluation of knowledge; • Scholarly competence in the organization , interpretation , and evaluation of knowledge

• Professional competence in the communication and dissemination of knowledge

• Potential to solve contemporary problems in various aspects of music. (source: National Association of Schools of Music Handbook. p. 100).

Student Learning Outcome Evidence Methods of Assessment Data Collection and Use

1. Graduate students will be excellent performers on voice or instrument.

Applied Music Juries

Students perform a “jury” at the end of each semester. This is the final exam for vocal or instrumental applied study. The jury is heard by the applied teacher and 2-4 other faculty members.

A rubric is used to assign a grade and give comments to the students. Students also provide a repertoire sheet that lists all music studied during the semester.

This is an ongoing assessment that provides continues feedback for the student, the professor, and the department.

Schedule for data collection.

• Jury performed at the end of each semester

Who is responsible?

• Studio Teacher, assisted by faculty committee.

Use of Data

• Assessment directly affects the future teaching of that studio teacher in the next semester. Overall progress of students is monitored by the faculty. • We will also compile the results

of the juries to provide qualitative and quantitative data for

evaluating the overall

effectiveness of this part of the our program Results are used in future decision on class offerings, course content and staffing.

(4)

Graduate Recital

Applied study culminates in the Graduate Recital normally during the last year. This is a capstone public concert.

The Graduate Recital requires a preview. one month before the concert. This ensures a prepared, high quality performance. The recital is graded A/F by the student’s studio teacher in consultation with pertinent area faculty (Vocal or Instrumental) in attendance.

Schedule for data collection. • Graduate Recital is normally

performed during the final year in residence.

Who is responsible?

• Studio Teacher, assisted by faculty committee.

Use of Data

• Assessment directly affects the future teaching of that studio teacher in the next semester. • We will also compile the results

of the recital to provide

qualitative and quantitative data for evaluating the overall effectiveness of this part of the our program Results are used in future decision on class offerings, course content and staffing.

(5)

Student Learning Outcome Evidence Methods of Assessment Data Collection and Use

2. Graduate students will demonstrate the advanced musical and pedagogical knowledge and research/writing skills necessary to begin their professional performing career and/or demonstrate their readiness to teach at the college and/or university level.

Written Comprehensive Exam,

Following the completion of all required course work, the student will sit for a written exam, which consists of one question each in the areas of Music Theory, Music History, and Music Education. The exam is proctored by the chair of the student’s graduate committee.

The result is a P/F grade. Students may not move on to their paper defense (oral exam) without passing the written comprehensives (direct evidence).

The exam is graded by the individual faculty members submitting the questions. Grades are given to the chair of the student’s graduate

committee, who, in turn, informs the student and the Graduate Coordinator.

Schedule for data collection. • Written Comprehensive Exams

are normally taken during the last semester in residence

Who is responsible?

• Chair of the student’s graduate committee, supported by faculty who submit and grade the exam questions.

Use of Data

• Exam scores are revealed to the graduate student and the Graduate Coordinator, who validates (or nullifies) the student’s progress toward graduation. Results are used in future decision on class offerings, course content and staffing.

Student Learning Outcome Evidence Methods of Assessment Data Collection and Use

3. Graduate students will demonstrate the advanced musical and pedagogical knowledge and research/writing skills necessary to begin their professional performing career and/or demonstrate their readiness to teach at the college and/or university level.

Thesis/Plan B Paper/Oral Defense

Students select a graduate committee in consultation with the Graduate Coordinator. The chair of that committee assists the student in selecting and submitting a paper subject proposal to the departmental Graduate Committee, who approves or rejects the subject proposal. The final document is submitted to the student’s graduate committee, who reads the paper, makes their

suggestions, then administers a final, oral exam (defense). This is the final requirement for the Master of Music in Performance degree.

The result is a P/F grade (Thesis: A/F). Students may not graduate without passing their written paper or oral defense.

Schedule for data collection. • Normally, final semester in

residence. (Some students complete requirements by registering as “off-campus” status)

Who is responsible?

• Chair of the student’s graduate committee, the graduate committee who reads the paper and administers the oral exam Use of Data

• Information is revealed to the graduate student and the Graduate Coordinator, who validates (or nullifies) the student’s progress toward graduation. Results are used in future decision on class offerings, course content and staffing.

(6)

References

Related documents

An ad hoc Evaluation Committee for Graduate Programs in Music ·Education and Music History/Literature has suggested that the coordinator of Music Education,

Subgroup analyses taking into account patient characteristics and ethnicity failed to identify any association between the 55L allele and stroke susceptibility, but

The soap for which the time taken for the disappearance of foam is highest has maximum foaming capacity and is the best quality soap among the soaps tested.. We can

students should have a Thesis Advisor and a Graduate Committee, and must turn in the Graduate Student Supervisory Committee Appointment Form to the Graduate Program Coordinator

Every student, regardless of tenure in the graduate program, who makes a “C” in a graduate-level course will be required to appear before the Graduate Faculty Committee during

• NSF: $3 billion, including $2.5 for research, $400 million for infrastructure, $100 million for education.. • NASA: Unclear (probably $1 billion for science; including $400

Conclusion of the Program Graduate Music Education Committee Graduate Music Program Advisor Music Oral Examination Committee comprised of Music Graduate Faculty

• In a typical year, we receive over 200 applications for a maximum of 45 spots in the SLP program. For Audiology we receive over 45 applications for a maximum of 12 spots to