• No results found

CATEGORY 8: UNDERSTANDING THE NEW CATEGORY OF PERFORMANCE FOR BALANCED TWISTED PAIR CABLE

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "CATEGORY 8: UNDERSTANDING THE NEW CATEGORY OF PERFORMANCE FOR BALANCED TWISTED PAIR CABLE"

Copied!
6
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

designed to be better.

ORTRONICS

®

Cindy Montstream, RCDD/NTS, EE, CPLP

Director of eLearning and Standards

DATA COMMUNICATIONS

Legrand, North America

CATEGORY 8:

UNDERSTANDING THE

NEW CATEGORY OF

PERFORMANCE FOR

BALANCED TWISTED

PAIR CABLE

(2)

INTRODUCTION

Ethernet has become widely deployed as a preferred networking solution for many types of applications ranging from small business to large enterprise. Increased network traffic, driven by server virtualization and converged networking, is driving the need for higher bandwidth server connections.

Ethernet BASE-T interfaces, utilizing balanced twisted pair cabling, are prevalent. They have been well-matched for network environments with a mixed set of applications, equipment and networking port speeds. The ability to auto-negotiate between application speeds allows easy migration to higher speeds of operation on an as-needed basis, while maintaining compatibility with existing equipment. This, along with its cost effectiveness, makes balanced twisted pair cabling still a very popular media for supporting Ethernet applications.

The highest category of performance for balanced twisted pair cabling, in the TIA−568−C.2 standard, is category 6A. This category of performance was defined to support 10 Gigabit Ethernet (GbE) over balanced twisted-pair cabling in a channel, up to 100 meters in length, with up to 4 connectors.

In 2010, the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) ratified the 802.3ab standard defining 40 Gbps and 100 Gbps Ethernet transmission. There are many options for the physical medium dependent (PMD) sublayer that defines transmission and reception details about the physical layer. The majority of the options are listed below. As you can see, most PMDs listed are for 40/100 Gbps transmission over fiber. There is a shielded copper cable option for both 40 and 100 GbE for up to 7 m, but the supported media is twinax cable. There is no option for balanced twisted pair cable.

Table 1: Summary of Physical Layer Options for Supporting 40 and 100 GbE PMD/INTERFACE IEEE STANDARD SUPPORTED MEDIA

40GBASE-SR4 802.3ab OM3 multimode fiber @ 850 nm (4-lanes) up to 100 m OM4 multimode fiber @ 850 nm (4-lanes) up to 150 m 40GBASE-LR4 802.3ab Single-mode fiber @1310 nm (CWDM) up to 10 km 40GBASE-CR4 802.3ab Twinax cable (4-lanes) up to at least 7 m 40GBASE-KR4 802.3ab Backplane (4-lanes) up to 1 m

100GBASE-SR10 802.3ab OM3 multimode fiber @ 850 nm (10-lanes) up to 100 m OM4 multimode fiber @ 850 nm (10-lanes) up to 150 m 100GBASE-LR4 802.3ab Single-mode fiber @ 1310 nm (CWDM) up to 10 km 100GBASE-ER4 802.3ab Single-mode fiber @ 1310 nm (CWDM) up to 40 km 100GBASE-CR10 802.3ab Twinax cable (10-lanes) up to at least 7 m

IEEE announced a Call-for-Interest (CFI) for a new application, NGBASE-T in July 2012. NGBASE-T stands for Next Generation BASE-T beyond 10 Gbps. “BASE-T” signifies that the media will be balanced twisted pair cabling.

WHAT INITIATED THE

DEVELOPMENT OF CATEGORY 8?

The IEEE 802.3 NGBASE-T Call-for-Interest (CFI) led to the formation of a Study Group to investigate and possibly develop this technology. In March, 2013, IEEE approved the formation of the task group IEEE 802.3bq to develop the 40GBASE-T Ethernet Standard for supporting 40 GbE over cost effective twisted pair cabling.

Some of the main objectives of the 802.3bq group are the following:

■ Support full duplex operation only ■

■ Preserve the 802.3 Ethernet frame format utilizing the 802.3 MAC ■

■ Preserve the minimum and maximum frame size of current 802.3 standard ■

■ Support a Bit Error Rate (BER) better than or equal to 10-12 ■

■ Support auto-negotiation ■

■ Support energy efficient ethernet ■

■ Support local area networks using point-to-point links over structured

cabling topologies, including directly connected link segments

■ Do not preclude meeting FCC and CISPR EMC requirements ■

■ Support a data rate of 40 Gbps ■

■ Define a link segment based upon copper media specified by ISO/IEC

JTC1/SC25/WG3 and TIA TR-42.7 meeting the following characteristics: – 4-pair, balanced twisted-pair copper cabling

– Up to two connectors – Up to at least 30 m

■ Work in TIA 42.7 was initiated in 2013 to support this new PMD

(3)

TIA CATEGORY 8 SPECIFICATION

The TIA 42.7 Working Group has defined most of the parameters for category 8 cabling. The category 8 channel is a 2-connector model using foiled twisted pair (FTP) cable with a maximum permanent link length of 24 meters (79 feet), as shown in Figure 1 below. Category 8 transmission performance is specified from 1 MHz to 2000 MHz.

Figure 1: Category 8 Channel

CATEGORY 8 CABLE PERMANENT LINK – 24m MAX

CATEGORY 8

RJ-45 CORD CATEGORY 8 RJ-45 CORD

CATEGORY 8 RJ-45 OUTLET CATEGORY 8

RJ-45 OUTLET

Horizontal and backbone cable will consist of four balanced twisted pairs with conductors that can range from 22 AWG to 24 AWG. Cord cable consists of four balanced twisted pairs with conductors that range from 22 AWG to 26 AWG. Category 8 is a shielded solution with no specifications for bundled or hybrid cables.

Category 8 will use the RJ-45, an eight-position modular jack common to BASE-T applications, supported over structured cabling systems, defined within TIA. It will also support auto-negotiation for backwards compatibility since it still uses 4-pair balanced twisted-pair cable used by other

cable categories.

The length of the channel can vary from 28 meters to 32 meters, depending on the length of cordage (patch/equipment cords) allowed. This is because the patch cord length allowed is dependent on a de-rating factor. The de-rating factor is based on the wire gauge size (AWG) of the conductor used in the cordage. See Table 2 for the length of cordage allowed based on the de-rating factor.

Table 2: Patch Cord De-Rating Factor Based on a 24 Meter Permanent Link

EQUIPMENT CORD DE-RATING FACTOR LENGTH OF CORDAGE ALLOWED (M)

0% (22/23 AWG) 8

20% (24 AWG) 6

50% (26 AWG) 4

Although this is a great departure from the traditional 100 meter (328 feet), 4-connector channel, category 8 will be backwards compatible with existing cabling and equipment to allow auto-negotiation between 100 Mbps, 1 Gbps, 10 Gbps and 40 Gbps over balanced twisted-pair cabling. The category 8 specifications will be listed in Addendum 1 of TIA-568-C.2 (to be published as ANSI/TIA-568-C.2-1).

ISO/IEC CATEGORY 8 SPECIFICATION

ISO is the International Organization for Standardization. It creates standards for structured cabling similar to TIA, with participation from international organizations; the US has a delegation that participates also. The ISO/IEC 11801 standard is similar to the ANSI/TIA-568 standard.

Both organizations try to harmonize the standards but there are some

differences. For example, ISO specifies the channel performance specification as a “Class” and component performance specifications as a “Category”. TIA has traditionally used “Category” to reference the component, link and channel performance specifications.

Currently, ISO has the following category and class specifications:

■ Category 5 components provide

Class D balanced cabling

performance (specified to 100 MHz)

■ Category 6 components provide

Class E balanced cabling

performance (specified to 250 MHz)

■ Category 6A components provide

Class EA balanced cabling performance (specified to 500 MHz)

■ Category 7 (shielded) components

provide Class F balanced cabling performance (specified to 600 MHz)

■ Category 7A (shielded)

components provide Class FA balanced cabling performance (specified to 1000 MHz)

TIA performance specifications only recognize up to category 6A; not category 7 or 7A (shielded

solutions). ISO has also been working on category 8.1 and 8.2 component specifications to support a new Class I and II channel specification, respectively. The existence of these ISO performance specifications is the reason TIA chose category 8 as the next performance specification. The Class I specification is similar to the current TIA category 8 specification. Originally, the ISO Class I channel and 8.1 component performance was specified only to 1.6 GHz. ISO is working on extending the performance specification to 2 GHz, like the TIA category 8 specifications, to comply with IEEE. TIA has a task group investigating a performance specification similar to ISO’s Class II and category 8.2 specifications. The naming conventions for channel and

component performance specifications and whether it will align with ISO’s naming conventions has not yet been determined. Work within TIA has been focused on completing category 8 defined as a twisted-pair,

30-meter channel, using up to (2) RJ45 connections.

(4)

ISO also recognizes several connector types for category 8. These interfaces are shown in Table 3 below. Category 8.1/Class I uses an RJ45 interface. This is the same interface used in all TIA category specifications (TIA-568-C.2 standard), including the in-progress category 8 specification. ISO recognizes three interfaces for category 8.2/Class II; the TERA, GG45, and ARJ45. These are also recognized category 7A interfaces in ISO. It remains uncertain whether TIA will adopt any of these connector interfaces if they create a Class II specification similar to ISO.

Table 3: Connection Interfaces for Category 8 in ISO Standards

PMD/INTERFACE SUPPORTED MEDIA TYPE DWG DESCRIPTION

Category 8.1/Class I ISO/IEC 11801TIA 568-C.2 RJ45

Category 8.2/Class II

IEC 61076-3-104

(C7A Interface) TERA1 IEC 60603-7-71

(C7A Interface) GG452 IEC 61076-3-110

(C7A Interface) ARJ453

Notes: 1. TERA® is a registered trademark of The Siemon Company.

2. GG45® is a registered trademark of Nexans (France).

3. ARJ45® is a registered trademark of Bel Fuse Ltd (Hong Kong).

WHAT IS THE APPLICATION

Development of a category 8 performance standard was driven by the need to support the next generation of NGBASE-T. The need for the next generation BASE-T standard was substantiated by a need to support Ethernet beyond 10GbE for server-to-switch connections. The existing 40 GbE over copper standard (ratified in 2010), 40GBASE-CR4, defines 40 Gbs over twinax cable for up to 7 meters. This is sufficient for use within a rack or a neighboring rack but not sufficient for supporting other architectures within a data center. Therefore, the initial application driving the development of NGBASE-T and category 8 was support for server-to-switch connections within a row, such as end-of-row or middle-of-row architectures as shown in Figure 2.

Figure 2: Applications for 40GBASE-T

Category 8 will allow support of 40 Gbps over balanced twisted-pair cable for 28 to 32 meters depending on the patch cordage wire gage (AWG) used. This distance works well for use within racks, neighboring racks, and end-of-row racks. Switch fabrics, like leaf and spine, are growing in popularity in the data center and may also provide an application for category 8. Category 8 will use an RJ45 interface, which is backwards compatible with previous TIA category standards, and will support auto- negotiation making transitions to faster data applications easy. At the November 2014 IEEE 802.3 Plenary Meeting, there was call for interest to add 25GBASE-T to the portfolio of Ethernet PMDs over twisted-pair copper cabling. The technical feasibility was based on the fact that 25GBASE-T would build on the technology of existing10GBASE-T and 40GBASE-T being developed. 25GBASE-T could use the category 8, 2-connector channel being developed in TIA. This technology would

provide an Ethernet upgrade path from 1G to 10G to 25G to 40G. Work on 25GBASE-T will be done within IEEE802.3bq, the group currently developing the 40GBASE-T standard. A document has also been produced in TIA that identifies opportunities for high-performance structured cabling (i.e. category 8). The

TIA TR-42.7 subcommittee approved a new Technical Service Bulletin, TIA TSB-5019, “High Performance Structured Cabling Use Cases for Data Centers and Other Premises” for publication at the February, 2015, plenary meeting. This document is intended to provide details for deploying future category 8 structured cabling in data centers and other premises to support 25GBASE-T and 40GBASE-T

applications. The document identifies, analyzes and recommends

architectures like switch fabric, end-of-row, middle-of-row and top-of-rack for high performance structured cabling utilizing next generation BASE-T standards with Next Gen BASE-T well suited to

cover server to switch connections within the row

Distance served by NGBASE-T

■ Within the rack ■

■ Neighboring racks, stranded ports ■

■ End of row

Distance served by CR4

■ Within the rack ■

(5)

25GBASE-T and 40GBASE-T. These examples can be used in data center or premise designs like test labs or equipment rooms requiring high bandwidth solutions.

WHAT ARE THE

CHALLENGES?

One of the biggest challenges has been defining the measurement technology required to assess and verify category 8 component, link and channel performance. The frequency range has drastically increased from 500MHz for CAT 6A to 2,000MHz for CAT 8. There are several tasks groups working on this.

One task group is working on updating the ANSI/TIA-1183: Measurement Methods and Test Fixtures for Balun-Less Measurements of Balanced Components and Systems standard. This standard is intended to be used as an independent testing reference and describes methods and fixtures that support laboratory measurement of all differential mode, mixed mode, and common mode transmission parameters up to 1 GHz. Category 8 requires extending the frequency range to 2 GHz.

Another task group is working on updating the ANSI/TIA-1152: Requirements for Field Test

Instruments and Measurements for Balanced Twisted-Pair Cabling. This standard provides requirements for field test instruments, as well as measurement methods to compare field instrument measurements against measurements obtained using laboratory equipment. The challenge is that the frequency range to be tested was 500 MHz for CAT 6A but will be 2,000 MHz for CAT 8. The proposal is to increase the accuracy level from 1G to 2G. Table 4 below lists the field tester accuracy levels that exist today, the proposed CAT 8 required level, and some accuracy levels specific to ISO.

Table 4: Field Tester Accuracy Levels

Field Tester Accuracy Levels

CABLING STANDARD FREQUENCY RANGE (MHz) ACCURACY LEVEL

CAT 5e 100 Level II

CAT 6 250 Level III

CAT 6A 500 Level IIIe

CAT 8 2,000 Level 2G (proposed)

ISO-Only Accuracy Levels (ISO 61935-1)

CABLING STANDARD FREQUENCY RANGE (MHz) ACCURACY LEVEL

CLASS F 600 Level IV

CLASS FA 1000 Level V (draft)

Much of the work on the ANSI/TIA-1183 standard has been completed and is in the ballot process as of early 2015. Defining the field test requirements for ANSI/TIA-1152 has been challenging but work is progressing and this standard is also in the ballot process.

SUMMATION AND CONCLUSIONS

Will category 8 be widely adopted? That is the question being asked by many. A twisted-pair Ethernet (BASE-T) solution has advantages such as being one of the most widely adopted structured cabling technologies, low cost, using a common connector interface and auto-negotiation capabilities. Although the category 8 standard is not complete as of early 2015, the TIA category 8 interface is the RJ45. The category 8 channel length has been reduced from the historical 100 meter channel length and is a shielded solution, with the channel being limited to 2 connectors. Both the 30 meter channel length (can vary from 28-32 meters depending on cordage) and 2-connector channel limitations must be included in designs intended to support future BASE-T applications.

There is a task group investigating whether TIA should define a Class II category 8 specification with better component specs, similar to ISO’s category 8.2 components. If there is enough support to add this to the TIA-568.2 standard, it will most likely be after the current category 8 standard is completed. For Class II category 8, TIA might have to adopt one or more of the other connector types currently listed in the ISO Category 8.2/Class II specification (see Table 3). There is much discussion in TIA since the three interfaces (shown in Table 3) are not compatible with the existing RJ45. There are questions about whether the RJ45 will be able to achieve the component performance being considered for Class II.

How widely will category 8 be adopted? Will fiber be less expensive? Time will tell, however, keep an eye on the active equipment manufacturers because they greatly impact what gets adopted.

TIA hopes to complete the category 8 standard by the end of 2015 but will more likely be completed in 2016.

(6)

Data Communications

125 Eugene O’Neill Drive New London, CT 06320 800.934.5432 www.legrand.us

designed to be better.™

©2015 Legr

and All Rights Reserv

ed r

ev

.07|15

References

Related documents

IEEE 802.3 shorthand term for 100 Mbps Fast Ethernet based on PAM5x5 signal encoding and using two pairs of category 3 twisted pair cable.

Graphs showing the Recognition rank vs Hit rate for SURF based face recognition algorithm for FB probe set.. Graphs showing the Recognition rank vs Hit rate for SURF based

To meet these increasing demands for bandwidth in the data center, 10 Gb/s applications over balanced twisted-pair cabling, twinax cabling and optical fiber cabling are growing..

Standard. Commercial Building Telecommunications Cabling Standard – Part 2: Balanced Twisted Pair Components. Transmission Performance Specifications for 4-Pair 100 Ohm Category

■ Category 5 cabling with connections up to at least 100 meters The IEEE 802.3z Gigabit Ethernet standard, approved in June 1998, specified three transceivers to cover three

• 568-B.2-10: Addendum10 of 568-B.2 specifies the development of cabling, component specifications, and test procedures to support the operation of IEEE 802.3an – 10 Gigabit

Following the same logic that suggests that leader displays of positive affect may be part of follower conceptions of charismatic leadership (cf. Meindl, 1995) and therefore

DeCarlo (2010) “The Impact of Corporate Social and Environmental Stewardship on Consumer Perceptions of Agricultural Products.” American Society of Business