• No results found

United States, 1986

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Share "United States, 1986 "

Copied!
183
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

Current Estimates From the National Health Interview Survey

United States, 1986

Includes estimates on incidence of acute conditions, episodes of persons injured, disability days, physician contacts,

prevalence of chronic conditions, limitation of activity, hospitalizations, and assessed health status. Estimates are based on data collected in the National Health Interview Survey of 1986.

Data From the National Health Survey

Series 10, No. 164

(2)

Copyright information

All material appearing in this report is in the public domain and may

(3)

National Center for Health Statistics Manning Feinleib, M.D., Dr.P.H., Director Robert A. Israel, Deputy Director

JacobJ. Feldman,Ph.D., Associate DirectorforAnalysis and Epidemiology

Gail F. Fisher, Ph.D., Associate Directorfor Planning and Extramural Programs

Peter L. Hurley, Associate Directorfor Vital and Health Statistics Systems

StephenE. Nieberding, Associate Director for Management GeorgeA. Schnack, Associate Directorfor Data Processing and Services

Monroe G. Sirken, Ph.D., Associate Directorfor Research and Methodology

SandraS. Smith, Information Oficer

Division of Health Interview Statistics

Owen T. Thornberry,Jr., Ph.D., Director

Gerry E. Hendershot,Ph.D., ChieJ Illness and Disability Statistics Branch

Nehna B. Keen, ChieJ Systems and Programming Branch Stewart C. Rice, Jr., Chiefl Survey Planning and

Development Branch

Robert A. Wright, ChieJ Utilization and Expenditure Statistics Branch

Coopemtionof the US. Bureau of the Census

(4)

I I

1 I Contents

Introduction ... 1

Sourceandlimitationsofdata ... 2

Highlights for 1986 ... 3

Acute conditions:Incidence,medical attention, and associatedrestriction in activity ... 3

Episodesofpersonsinjured ... 4

Restrictedactivity associatedwith injury and impairmentdue to injury. ... : ... 5

Prevalenceofreportedchronicconditions ... 5

Limitation of activity due to chronic conditions ... 5

Restrictedactivity due to acuteand chronic conditions ... 6

Respondent-assessedhealthstatus ... 6

Physiciancontacts:Rate and interval sincelast contact... 6

Hospitalization: Episodesand days for persons;dischargesand averagelengthof stay. ... 7

Selectedtopics... 9

Impact of selectedreportedchronic conditions ... 9

Differentialsindentalcare ... 10

References... 12

List of detailedtables ... 13

Appendixes I. Technicalnotesonmethods... 134

II. Definitions of certain terms usedin this report. ... 141

III. Questionnairesandflashcards... 146

List of text tables A. Acute conditionsmeasures:United States, 1984-86 ... 4

B. Episodesof personsinjured and associatedrestrictionsin activity: United States, 1984-86 ... 5

C. Health statusmeasures:United States,1984-86 ... 6

D. Health care utilization: United States, 1984-86 ... 7

E. Impact of selectedchronic conditions:United States,1986. ... 9

F. Selectedmeasuresof dental care: United States,1986. ... 10

(5)

Symbols -.. Data not available . . . Category not applicable

Quantity zero

0.0 Quantity more than zero but less than 0.05

Z Quantity more than zero but less than 500 where numbers are rounded to thousands

* Figure does not meet standard of reliability or precision (more than 30-percent relative standard error in numerator of percent or rate)

# Figure suppressed to comply with

confidentiality requirements

(6)

Current Estimates From the National Health

Interview Survey

by Deborah A. Dawson, Ph.D., and Patricia F. Adams, Division of Health Interview Statistics

Introduction

This report on the 1986civilian noninstitutionalizedpopu­

lation residingin the United Statespresentsestimatesof acute conditions,episodesof personsinjured, restriction in activity, limitation of activity due to chronic conditions, prevalenceof chronic conditions,respondent-assessed health status,and the useof medicalservices-includingphysiciancontactsandshort­

stay hospitalization.

Estimates of thesehealth characteristicsare presentedin detailed tables for various groupsin the population, including thosedefinedby age,sex,race, andfamily income(eachshown for specific agegroups),andby geographicregion and place of residence.Estimates for other characteristicsof special rele­

vanceto particular health measuresare also included. For in­

stance,estimatesof physiciancontactsare shownby the place wherethe contact occurred.

The text includes a brief definition of each of the health characteristicsincluded in the detailed tables and reports the 1986 estimatefor each characteristic.Text tables include the corresponding1984 and 1985 estimatesfor eachof the major health characteristics.The remainderof the report deals with various technical matters associatedwith the National Health Interview Survey(NHIS) data collection proceduresandpres­

entationof the results.

This year’s report contains severalnew features.For the first time, text tables contain age-standardizedestimates,to facilitate comparisonsover time, as well as unstandardized estimates.Two new sectionshavebeenaddedto the text: (a) a sectionpresentingadditionaldetail aboutoneof the majorhealth characteristics,and (b) a discussionof selectedfindings con­

cerningone of the specialtopics includedin the current year’s NHIS. For 1986, thesetwo sectionsdiscuss(a) impact of se­

lected reported chronic conditions, and (b) differentials in dental care.

In 1985 a new samplefor NHIS and a differentmethodof presenting sampling errors were introduced. Therefore, the technicalmaterial is of unusualimportanceto readerswho are accustomedto using data from the NHIS prior to 1985.

Although publishedreportsarethe primary vehiclefor dis­

seminatingestimatesfrom the NHIS, data are also availablein the form of standardizedmicrodatatapesthat includethe regular characteristicsof eachyear’s survey from 1969 through 1986.

Questionspertainingto the cost and availability of thesetapes shouldbe directedto theNational TechnicalInformationService, 5285 Port Royal Road, Springfield, Va. 22161. Public use tapesare also availablefor specialtopics includedin the NHIS from 1973 through 1986. The special topics studied in 1986 coveredfour areas:(a) longest job worked, including occupa­

tion, industry, and number of years worked in that job; (b) dental health, including dental visits, water sources, dental productsused,fluoride rinsesandpills, anddental sealants;(c) functional limitations, including problemsand sourcesof help with activitiesof daily living @IX’s) andinstrumentalactivities of daily living (IADL’s); and (d) vitamin and mineral intake, includingtype and quantity taken.Informationon tapesrelating to specialtopicsis availablefrom the National Centerfor Health

Statistics,Division of Health Interview Statistics,Systemsand

ProgrammingBranch, 3700 East-West Highway, Hyattsville,

Md. 20782.

(7)

Source and limitations of data

The information from the National Health Interview Sur­

vey (NHIS) presentedin this report is basedon data collected in a continuingnationwidesurveyby householdinterview.Each week a probability sampleof the civilian noninstitutionalized populationof the United Statesis interviewedby personnelof the U.S. Bureau of the Census.Information is obtainedabout the health and other characteristicsof each member of the household.

Becauseof funding limitations, the 1986 NHIS was con­

ducted with a sample approximately half the size of the full sampledesign.The interviewedsamplefor 1986was composed of 23,838 householdscontaining 62,052 persons. The total noninterviewrate was 3.5 percent: 2.3 percent was due to re­

spondentrefusal,andthe remainderwas dueprimarily to failure to locate an eligible respondentat home after repeatedcalls.

In 1985, the NHIS adopted several new sample design features although, conceptually, the sampling plan remained the sameas the previous design.The major changesincluded (a) reducing the number of primary sampling locations from 376 to 198 for samplingefliciency, (b) oversamplingthe black populationto improve the precisionof the statistics, (c) subdi­

vidingthe NHIS sampleinto four separaterepresentativepanels to facilitate linkage to other National Center for Health Sta­

tistics (NCHS) surveys, and (d) using an all-area frame not basedon the decennialcensusto facilitate NCHS survey link­

ageandto conductNHIS followback surveys.A descriptionof the surveydesign,the methodsusedin estimation,and general qualificationsof the dataobtainedfrom the surveyarepresented in appendixI.

Becausethe estimatespresentedin this report arebasedon a sampleof the population,they are subjectto samplingerrors.

Samplingerrors for the 1986 estimatesare larger than in pre­

cedingyearsbecauseof the reducedsample.Therefore,readers should pay particular attention to the section of appendix I entitled“Reliability of the estimates,”which presentsformulas for calculatingstandarderrors and instructionsfor their use.

All information collectedin the surveyresultsfrom reports by responsiblefamily membersresidingin the household.When possible,all adult family membersparticipatein the interview.

However, proxy responsesare acceptedfor family members who are not at home and are requiredfor all children and for family memberswho do not meetthe NHIS criteria requiredof a respondent.Although a considerableeffort is madeto ensure accuratereporting, the information from both proxy and self­

respondentsmay be inaccuratebecausethe respondentis un­

awareof relevantinformation,hasforgottenit, doesnot wish to reveal it to an interviewer,or becausethe respondentdoesnot understandthe intendedmeaningof a question.

The major conceptsfor which estimatesare shown in this report aredefinedin appendixII. Appendix III includesa copy of the questionnaireand flashcardsused in the interview. Ill­

nessesand injuries are codedusing a slight modification of the ninth revision of the International Classification of Diseases.’

The Division of Health Interview Statistics of NCHS should

be contactedfor informationaboutcodingandeditingprocedures

used to produce the final data file from which the estimates

shownin this report are derived.

(8)

Highlights for 1986

In the following sections,each of the health-relatedchar­

acteristicsincludedin this report is defined,and the 1986 esti­

mate is comparedwith the 1984 and 1985 estimates213 for the same characteristic.The comparisonsare highlighted in text tables, which also include the standard error for each of the 1986 estimates. The correspondingstandard errors for the 1984 and 1985 estimates are not shown becausethey are similar to the 1986 standard errors. The reader who wants some idea of how much difference there must be be­

tweenthe 1984, 1985, and 1986 estimatesto constitutea sta­

tistically significant difference may use the standard errors to calculate a confidenceinterval or a critical value for the f-test. Of these two methods, the t-test (with a 95-percent level of significance)has been used in the following discus­

sion as a basis for making statementsabout the difference or lack of differencebetweenthe 1984, 1985, and 1986 esti­

mates.

Becausethe text comparesonly the overall rates or per­

centsof health-relatedcharacteristicsbetween1984 and 1986, and the age distribution of the civilian noninstitutionalized population does not changegreatly over a 3-year period, the possibleeffect of differing agedistributions is not discussedin the text. Tables A-D include age-standardizedas well as un­

standardizedfigures, and the 3-year trends are similar for the two.

Readersusingthe detailedtables who wish to make com­

parisons of subgroupsof the population may want to take into account the possible effect of age in comparing sub groups. For those sociodemographic characteristics for which the age distributions of the subgroups differ to a significant degree(such as for sex, age, and family income), the results are shown for specific age groups. However, in the case of geographic region and place of residence, there is little difference in the age distributions of the sub

Acute conditions: Incidence, medical attention, and associated restriction in activity

An acute condition is defined for the National Health Interview Survey (NHIS) as a type of illness or injury that ordinarily lasts lessthan 3 months,was first noticed lessthan 3 months before the referencedate of the interview, and was seriousenoughto have had an impact on behavior. Only two types of impact are considered:First, whether the illness or injury causedthe personto cut down for at least a half a day on the things he or she usually does and, second,whether a phy­

sician was contactedregardingthe illness or injury.

incidence

Tables l-5 show the incidencerate and tables 6-10 the incidenceof acute conditions by type of condition and socio­

demographiccharacteristics.The 1986 rate of 189.8 acute conditions per 100 personsper year was significantly higher than the comparableestimatesfor 1984 and 1985 (176.9 and 175.3, respectively)(table A).

For broad types of acute conditions, the 1986 incidence rates per 100 personsper year ranked as follows: Respiratory conditions(96.8), injuries(27.2), infectiveandparasiticdiseases (23.0), and digestive system conditions (6.3). The rates for infective and parasitic diseases,digestive system conditions, and injurieswere similar to thosefor 1984 and 1985.The 1986 estimate for respiratory conditions (96.8) was considerably higher than in either 1984 (88.7) or 1985 (87.1), primarily becauseof an increasein the incidencerate of influenza(from 44.7 and40.4, respectively,in 1984 and 1985to 55.2 in 1986).

Medical attention

Tables 1l- 15 show estimatesof the percentof acutecon­

(9)

Table A. Acute conditions measures: United States, 1984-88

Unstsnderdized Age stenderdized

1986 Standard

Acute condition measure 1984 1985 Estimate error 1984 1985 1986

Annual incidence of acute conditions Number per 100 persons per year

All acute conditions . . . , , . . . , . . . . . . . . . 176.9 175.3 189.8 6.6 177.8 176.4 191.5 Infective and parasitic diseases. . . . . . . . . . * . . . . . . . . . . . . . , 20.1 20.5 23.0 1.3 20.3 20.8 23.3 Respiratory conditions’ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Common cold . . . , . . . . . * . . . . . . . . . . . * . . . . .

* . . . . . 88.7 28.6

87.1 96.8 3.3 89.3 87.6

30.5 26.8 1.4 28.7 30.7

98.0 27.1 Influenza . , . . . , . . . , , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . * . 44.7 40.4 55.2 2.2 45.1 40.4 55.9 Digestive system conditions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7.6 7.0 6.3 0.6 7.7 7.1 6.4 Injuries. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27.1 27.4 27.2 1.5 27.3 27.6 27.4 Other acute conditions. . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33.5 33.4 36.4 1.8 33.3 33.3 36.4

Acute conditions medically attended Percent

Allacute conditions... . . . . 57.7 60.8 58.2 0.8 57.4 59.8 58.2

Restricted activity associated with acute conditions Number of days per 100 persons per year

All restricted-activity days , . . . , . . . , . . . . . 741 .o 687.4 763.8 27.9 739.3 685.2 763.7 Beddays ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Work-loss days2 ... . . . . . . . . . * . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . 325.2 306.6

302.5 345.0 15.1 325.4 302.2

309.6 330.5 16.9 296.3 300.3

345.5 333.3 School-loss days3. ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 414.1 386.9 422.5 27.2 414.1 386.9 422.5

Quarterly incidence of acute conditions Number per 100 persons per quarter

January 1 -March 31 ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

April 1 -June 30 ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . * . . . . .

July 1 -September 30. ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

October 1 -December 31 ... . . . . . * . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. .

60.9 36.8 33.0 46.2

58.0 64.6 2.5 _ _ _ _ _ _

35.9 34.3 1.6 _ _ _ _ _ _

34.3 34.9 1.6 - - _ - - _

47.1 56.0 2.2 - - _ - - -

‘Includes other acute respiratory conditions.

2For currently employed persons 1% years of age and over.

3For youths 5-l 7 years of age.

NOTE: Detailed tables show the 1986 estimates by age, sex, race, family income, geographic region, and place of residence.

does.Estimatesof “cut-down”daysarenot presentedseparately but are included in the genericconcept of “restricted-activity days.”The other threetypes of restrictedactivity also included in the genericconcept “restricted activity” are usually shown separatelyin reportsfrom NHIS.

A personmay restrict his or her activity on a given day as a result of more than one condition, and theseconditionsmay be acuteor chronic. “Restricted activity associatedwith acute conditions”includesdays on which only one or more than one acute condition causedthe activity restriction; it also includes days on which one or more acute conditions and one or more chronic conditionscausedthe activity restriction. In the latter case,becausethe restriction in activity was due to both acute

persons18 yearsof ageand over were similar for 1984, 1985, and 1986.

Tables 26-49 show the detailedrates and frequenciesfor bed days (tables 26-35), work-loss days (tables 36-45), and school-lossdays (tables46-49).

Incidence by quarter

The 1986 incidencerate and incidenceof acuteconditions

by quarter are shownin table 50. .4s may be noted in table A,

the estimatedrates for the first and fourth quarters of 1986

(64.6 and 56.0) are higherthan the comparableratesfor 1985

(58.0 and 47.1), primarily becauseof the excessincidenceof

influenza during those two quartersof 1986.4For the second

(10)

during 1986 that involved one or more injuries. Becauseof the short referenceperiod used to collect injury data in NHIS (2 weeks),the data cannotbe usedto estimatethe numberof per­

sonsinvolved in oneor more episodesof personsinjuredduring any given year.

Table 51 showsthe incidencerate of episodesof persons injured and table 52 the incidenceof such episodesby socio­

demographiccharacteristics;whether a moving motor vehicle was involved (and if so, whetherthis occurredin traffic); where the episodeoccurred; and, for persons 18 years of age and over, whetherthey wereworking at ajob or businessat the time the episodeoccurred. The 1986 rate of episodesof persons injured per 100 personsper year (26.4) is almost identical to the 1984 rate of 26.4 and the 1985 rate of 26.8 (table B).

Restricted activity associated with injury and impairment due to injury

An injury may have health-relatedeffects for many years after it occurs, or, for that matter, even for a lifetime. (This might be the case,for instance,for a personwho suffereda dis­

locatedback due to an accident.)The estimatesof activity re­

striction in tables 53 and 54 and of bed days in tables 55 and 56 are basedon the presenteffects of injuries no matter when they occurred.Thus, theseestimatesincludethe days shownin earliertablesfor acuteinjuriesandalsoincludedaysof restricted activity during 1986 that are attributable to the effects of in- juries sufferedprior to 1986. In many casestheseold injuries have becomeimpairments,and any restricted activity during 1986 that was causedby an injury-relatedimpairment is also included.

The 1986 rate for restricted-activitydays associatedwith episodesof personsinjured (241.4 per 100 personsper year) appearslower than the 1984 and 1985 rates;however,the dif­

ferencesare not statistically significant (table B). The 1986 rate for bed days associatedwith episodesof personsinjured (79.0) is similar to the ratesfor the other two years.

Prevalence of reported chronic conditions

Chronic conditions are defined as conditions that either (a) were first noticed 3 months or more before the reference

date of the interview or (b) belong to a group of conditions (including heart disease,diabetes,and others)that are consid­

eredchronic regardlessof whenthey began.For the purposeof estimatingthe prevalenceof reported chronic conditions, the total NHIS sampleis dividedinto six representativesubsamples;

eachsubsampleis administeredoneof six checklistsof typesof chronic conditions. Respondentsare asked to indicate the presenceor absenceof eachconditionspecifiedon the particular list administeredto them. Becausethe presenceor absenceof many types of chronic conditionsis often difficult to ascertain, several“impact” questionsare askedabout eachconditionre­

ported. Information is elicited on whetherthe personhas been hospitalizedfor the condition andthe numberof days he or she stayedin bed becauseof the condition during the 12 months prior to the interview.

Totals for all chronic conditions are not shown because NHIS doesnot measurethe total numberof chronic conditions for eachperson.It shouldalsobe notedthat a personmay have more than one chronic condition; therefore,the sum of condi­

tions that are countedmay exceedthe sum of personshaving thoseconditions.

Tables 57-61 showthe prevalencerate and tables62-66 the prevalenceof selectedchronic conditions.As may be noted in table 57, the reportedconditionswith the highestprevalence rates are sinusitis, arthritis, and hypertension(with rates per 1,000personsof 145.5, 130.8, and 122.6, respectively).

Limitation of activity due to chronic conditions

The concept of limitation of activity used in this report refersto long-termreductionin activity resultingfrom chronic diseaseor impairment. The measurementof this concept in NHIS permits one to distinguishamong(a) personsunableto carry on their usual activity, (b) personslimited in the amount or kind of their usual activity, (c) personslimited but not in their usual activity, and (d) personsnot limited. The category of personslimited in their major activity includesthose in the first two groups, that is, those unable to carry on the usual activity for their age-sexgroup,whetherit is working, keeping house,goingto school,or capacity for independentliving, and thoserestrictedin the amountor kind of usual activity for their

Table 6. Episodes of persons injured and associated restrictions in activity: United States 1984-86

Unstandardized Age standardized

(11)

age-sexgroup.Personslimited, but not in their major activity, include persons restricted in other activities such as civic, church,or recreationalactivities.

The 1986 estimate of the percent of personslimited in activity due to chronic conditions(14.0 percent)is not signifi­

cantly different from the 1984 or 1985 estimates(table C).

Likewise,the estimatesof personslimited in their major activity (categories(a) and (b) discussedpreviously) are similar for 1984, 1985, and 1986 (9.7,9.5, and 9.4, respectively).

The detailedpercentdistributionsandfrequenciesfor limi­

tation in activity are shownby sociodemographic characteristics in tables67-68.

Restricted activity due to acute and chronic conditions

Earlier in this report estimatesof restricted-activity days associatedwith acute conditions were shown (tables 16-49) and the relationship betweenthe types of restricted-activity daysdiscussed.The estimatesshownin table 69 arefor person daysof restrictedactivity causedby acuteor chronicconditions, or both.

As may be noted in table C, the 1986 rate per personper year of restricted-activity days (15.2) is similar to the cor­

respondingrates for the two previous years. The differences observedbetweenthe 1986 ratesfor bed days(6.5) and school lossdaysfor youths5- 17 yearsof age(5.O)andthosefor 1984 and 1985 are within samplingvariation.

The estimatesof work-loss days per personper year for currently employedpersons18 yearsof ageandover appearto have increasedsteadily since 1984 (from 4.9 to 5.3 in 1985

Table C. Health status measures: United States, 1984-86

Health status measure

Restricted activity due to acute and chronic conditions All restricted-activity days ...

Beddays ...

Work-loss days’ ...

School-lossdays ...

and5.5 in 1986);however,thesedifferencesarenot statistically significant.

The detailed estimatesfor each type of restricted activ­

ity day are shown by sociodemographiccharacteristics in table 69.

Respondent-assessed health status

Data on assessedhealth status result from simply asking respondentsto assesstheir own health or that of family mem­

bersliving in the samehouseholdasexcellent,very good,good, fair, or poor. Table 70 showsthe percentdistribution for these categoriesaccordingto sociodemographiccharacteristics.The health of most personsin the civilian noninstitutionalizedpop ulation was assessedas “excellent” (39.4 percent) or “very good”(27.3 percent).Only 2.8 percent‘wereassessed as“poor”

(table C). Overall, the 1986 estimatesfor the health status categoriesshow respondentsassessinghealth the same way they did in 1985.

Physician contacts: Rate and interval since last contact

A contact is definedas a consultationwith a physician,in personor by telephone,for examination,diagnosis,treatment, or advice. The visit is considereda physician contact if the serviceis providedby the physicianor by anotherpersonwork­

ing underthe physician’ssupervision.

Annual rate

Table D showsthe ratesof physiciancontactsreportedfor 1984-86. The 1986 rate of 5.4 doctor visits per personper

Unstandardized Age standardized

1986 Standard

1984 1985 Estimate error 1984 1985 1986

Number of days per person per year

14.8 14.8 15.2 0.5 14.7

6.5 6.1 6.5 0.2 6.5

4.9 5.3 5.5 0.2

5.1 4.8 5.0 0.3 5.1

14.6 15.1

6.1 6.5

4,8 5.0

(12)

Table D. Health care utilization: United States, 1984-88

Unstandardized Age standardized

1986

Standard

Health care utilization 1984 1985 Estimate error 1984 1985 1986

Physician contact Number

Contacts per person per year . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5.1 5.3 5.4 0.1 5.0 5.2 5.3 Percent

Persons with 1 or more contacts in past year.. , . . . . . . 75.2 75.4 76.0 1 .o 75.1 75.3 76.0 Hospitalization

Persons with 1 or more hospital episodes in past year.. . . 9.6 9.2 8.6 0.2 9.5 9.0 8.5

Number

Hospital days per person hospitalized in past year.. . . . . . . . . . 9.2 8.5 8.3 0.4 8.2 7.5 7.5 Discharges per 100 persons per year. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13.4 12.4 11.8 0.3 13.2 12.2 11.6 Average length of stay per discharge in days . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7.2 6.7 6.6 0.6 6.5 6.0 5.9 NOTE: Detailed tables show the 1986 estimates by age, sex, race, family income, geographic region, and place of residence.

year is higher than the rate for 1984 (5.1) and similar to the 1985 rate (5.3).

Aside from the sociodemographiccharacteristics,the rates and frequenciesare also shownby the place of contact in table 7 1. The rate was highestfor doctor’s office (3.0 per personper year), and it was under one contact per person per year for each of the other places mentioned(telephone,hospital, and other).

Interval since last contact

Table 72 shows the percent distribution and number of personsby the interval of time sincethe personlast had a phy­

sician contact. Whereasthe estimatesfor the rate of physician contacts do not include contacts while a personwas an over- night patient in a hospital, such contacts are included in the definitionsof the interval since a personlast saw or talked to a physicianor a physician’sassistant.

Table D indicatesthat during 1986 an estimated76.0 per- cent of the civilian noninstitutionalizedpopulationhad contact with a physicianduringthe year precedinginterview. This esti­

mateis similar to the 1984 and 1985 estimates(75.2 and 75.4, respectively).

O ther estimatesof ambulatory medical care servicesby physiciansareprovidedby data from the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey, a probability samplesurvey conducted

through this series of questionsare the number of times and numberof days spentin short-stayhospitalsin the 12 months prior to interview.Becausepersonswho havedied or havebeen institutionalizedin a givenreferenceperiod are not included in NHIS, the rates and frequenciesshownin this report will vary from thosebasedon all overnightpatientswho entereda short- stay hospital during any given period of time. The difference will be especiallygreatfor older persons.

Estimates on hospitalization are presentedin two forms:

Episodeestimatesand dischargeestimates.Episode estimates focus on the person’shospital experienceduring the 12 months precedinginterview.The tablesshowingtheseestimatesclassify people on the basis of whether they were hospitalizedduring the referenceperiod and, if so, the numberof times they were hospitalized. Discharge estimatesfocus on hospital stays as the unit of analysisrather than on persons.

Hospital episodes and days

Tables 73 [percent distribution) and 74 (frequency)show the distribution of short-stay hospital episodesincluding and excludingdeliveriesby the numberof times a personwas hos­

pitalized during the year precedinginterview and sociodemc­

graphic characteristics.The category “delivery” is based on

the reasonthe woman enteredthe hospital or whethersurgery

related to delivery was performed.The percent of personsin

(13)

hospitaldays by the numberof times peoplewerehospitalized (including and excluding deliveries) and sociodemographic characteristics.

Hospital discharges and average length of stay

Table 77 showsthe rate andnumberof hospitaldischarges, the averagelengthof stay, andthe numberof hospitaldischarge days by so&demographic characteristicsand by whether a delivery was involved in the hospitalization. Based on data collectedduring 1986,therewere 11.8 dischargesper 100 per­

sons,andthe averagelengthof stay per dischargewas 6.6 days.

Both of theserates are similar to the 1984 and 1985 esti­

mates of dischargesper 1.00persons(13.4 and 12.4, respec­

tively) anddaysper discharge(7.2 and6.7). Examining longer term trends, the 1986 hospital dischargerate of 11.8 is 17 percent lower than the rate estimatedby the NHIS in 1981 (14.2), andthe lengthof stay is about 11 percentlower than in 1981.?

This fmdingprobablyreflectsthe followingtwo phenomena:

(a) The Health Care FinancingAdministration(which operates

the medicare program), some States, and some third party payers,now reimbursehospitalsfor inpatient careusinga pre­

establishedpayment schedulebased on patients’diagnosis­

related groups; and (b) some medical procedures,once per­

formedas inpatienthospitalcare,arenow handledin outpatient medicalfacilities.

Information is also collected on hospital dischargesfrom hospital recordsthroughthe National Hospital DischargeSur­

vey conductedby the National Center for Health Statistics.

Estimatesfrom the National Hospital DischargeSurvey,pub­

lished in Series 13 of Vital am! Health Statistics, are some- what higherthan thosepresentedherebecauseof differencesin collectionprocedures,populationsampled,anddefinitionsused.

The National Hospital Discharge Survey has experienceda

recent decline in its hospital dischargerates. The National

Hospital DischargeSurveyestimatesof averagelengthof stay

for older personsare also declining. Thus, the data from the

two surveysare consistent.The most recentnational estimates

of short-stay hospitalization basedon the National Hospital

DischargeSurvey are summarizedin Series13, Number 9 1.8

(14)

Selected topics

Impact of selected reported chronic conditions

Table E shows estimatesof the degreeto which certain conditions causedlimitation of activity or ever had been dis­

cussedwith a physician, and the rates of restricted activity causedby the conditions.Becauseof high samplingvariability, many of the conditions shown in the detailed tables are not includedin this table.

In a few cases,the prevalenceratesshownin this table are slightly lower than those shown in the detailed tables. This is becausetable E includes only the first condition for persons who had morethan oneconditionreportedin the rangeof codes definingthe conditionsshownin the detailedtables.

Table E. Impact of aelectsd chronic conditions: United States, 1986

Condition

Selected circulatory conditions Heartdisease ...

High blood pressure (hypertension). ...

Cerebrovasculardisease ...

Selected respiratory conditions Chronicsinusitis ...

Emphysema ...

Asthma ...

Selected digestive conditions Hernia of abdominal cavity ...

Gastritis, duodenitis, or frequent indigestion. ...

Impairments

It may be noted that those conditions with the highest prevalencedo not necessarilyhave the highest measuresof impact. Of the conditions shown, persons with complete or partial paralysis of extremitiesreportedthe highestfrequency of condition-relatedlimitation of activity, 56.8 percent,followed by intervertebraldisc disorderswith 48.5 percent,and emphy­

semawith 41.0 percent.In comparison,5.8 percentof persons with hearingimpairmentsand 3.4 percentof thosewith migraine headachesreportedlimitation of activity causedby those con­

ditions.

Over 65 percentof all personswith eachof the conditions shown in table E ever had seen a physician regardingtheir condition. One hundredpercent of all personswith diabetes, 99.9 percentof those with heart disease,and 99.0 percent of

Percent of persons Number of

with condition- days of

Number of restricted

persons Causing For which activity

per 1,000 limitation a physician per person

with condition of activity was ever seen with condition

. . . 65.6 29.2 99.9 19.2

. . . 122.6 11.5 99.0 4.3

. . 11.9 39.8 97.6 36.1

. . . 145.5 *0.4 65.7 *1.5

. . 6.5 47.0 97.1 ‘25.1

41 .o 20.6 95.5 10.6

. . . 19.4 10.3 98.4 *6.3

. . . 33.0 *0.6 72.1 ‘2.3

(15)

thosewith high blood pressureeverhad seena physician,com­

paredwith 76.1 percentof personswith a hearingimpairment;

72.1 percentof thosewith gastritis, duodenitis,or frequentin­

digestion;and 65.7 percentof thosewith chronic sinusitis.

Statistically reliable estimatesof restricted activity days were availablefor only one-halfof the conditions shown.Per­

sonswith cerebrovasculardiseasereportedthe highestrate of restrictedactivity days, 36.1 days per personper year, followed by personswith intervertebral disc disorders, 32.6 days per personper year. In comparison,personswith asthmaand high blood pressurereportedthe lowest rates, 10.6 and 4.3 days, respectively.

In general,the less prevalentchronic conditions were as­

sociatedwith higherreportedpercentsof personswith limitation of activity and physician care than those with higher rates of prevalence.Thus, it is not necessarilytrue that a diseasethat affectsa largersegmentof the populationhas a greateraverage impact on the ability of individuals to function normally. For instance,sinusitis is the most prevalentcondition listed, but it causesless limitation of activity, less physician care, and less restricted activity, on average,than any of the less prevalent conditions.On the otherhand,becausesinusitisis so prevalent, it has a greatercumulativeimpact on the populationthan some of the more seriousbut lessprevalentconditions.

Differentials in dental care

The 1986 NHIS contained a special series of questions concerningdental care, many of which were included in the

Table F. Selected measures of dental care: United States, 1986

1983 NHISg Information concerninguse of fluoride, other dental products, and dental sealantswas obtainedfor persons of all ages.Children under 2 years of agewere excludedfrom questionson numberof dentalvisits in the year precedinginter­

view, interval since last dental visit, and reasonfor last visit.

The householdrespondentprovidedinformation for all eligible family members.

The total sampleof individualsinterviewedfor this section was 6 1,522. The differencebetweenthis and the overall inter- viewed samplesize of 62,052 represents530 nonrespondents, a nonresponserate of about 1 percent. Standarderrors for the dentalitemsshownin table F can be calculatedusingparameter set X from appendixI.

Interval since last dental visit

The interval sincelast dentalvisit is a valuableindicator of the regularity of dental care. Dentists generallyrecommendat least one visit per year for routine cleaningand examination.

According to the 1986 NHIS, 58.5 percent of all Americans age 2 years and over went to the dentist at least once in the year precedingthe NHIS interview (table F). For 12.6percent of the population,the interval sincelast dentalvisit was 5 years or more, and 5.2 percentof all Americansneverhad beento a dentist.

There was a strongdifferential by agein the interval since last dentalvisit. The proportionof personswith a dentalvisit in the year precedinginterview was lowest, 33.5 percent,for chil­

dren age2-4 years and highest,7 1.5 percent, for youths age 5-17 years. After ages25-44 years, the percent of persons

Interval since lest dental visit Number of dental visits in past year

Under 1-2 2-5 5 years 5 or

Characteristic Total’ 1 year years years or more Never Total2 0 1 2 3-4 more

Percent distribution Pelocent distribution

All persons 2 years of age and eve?. . , . 100.0 58.5 8.9 14.9 Age

2-4 years.. . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . 100.0 33.5 2.7 0.9

5-17years ,,,,.,,...,..,....,... 100.0 71.5 8.5 10.1

18-24 years . . , . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . , . . . 100.0 58.0 12.5 19.2 25-44

years . . . , . . . , . . .

100.0 61.6 10.3 17.4 45-64 years . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 100.0 55.9 8.0 16.5 65 years and over.. . . . . 100.0 42.6 5.8 14.8

12.6 5.2 100.0 42.2 23.2 19.4 8.7 6.4

62.9 100.0 67.8 20.9 8.2 2.2 0.9

2; 7.7 100.0 29.1 29.4 24.5 7.9 9.0

7.8 2.5 100.0 42.8 25.8 18.3 7.4 5.7

9.7 1 .o 100.0 38.9 24.3 20.4 9.9 8.5

19.0 0.6 100.0 44.6 19.4 19.0 10.3 6.7

36.3 0.5 100.0 58.2 14.9 14.7 7.7 4.5

(16)

with a dental visit in the year precedinginterview decreased steadily with ageto 42.6 percentfor personsage65 years and over.

The majority (62.9 percent)of childrenage2-4 yearsnever had beento a dentist. In contrast, 7.7 percent of youths age 5-17 years,2.5 percentof persons18-24 years,andlessthan 1.0 percentof personsage25 years and over neverhad had a dentalvisit.

Femalesweremore likely than malesto havehad a dental visit in the year precedinginterview (60.5 percent compared with 56.2 percent),while malesweremorelikely neverto have had a dental visit (5.7 percentcomparedwith 4.7 percentfor females). The proportion of white individuals with a dental visit in the year precedinginterview was considerablyhigher thanthe comparableproportionfor black individuals,60.4 versus 45.4 percent,respectively.Conversely,the proportion of per­

sonswho never had visited a dentist was higher for the black population (8.6 percent) than for the white population (4.6 percent).

The proportion of personswith a dental visit in the year precedinginterviewincreasedwith family incomein 1986.Less than half (41.5 percent)of the individuals with family income of lessthan $10,000had beento a dentistin the year preceding interview, comparedwith almost three-fourths(74.4 percent) of thosewith family incomeof $35,000or more.The proportion of personswho neverhadbeento a dentistwas inverselyrelated to family income, decreasingfrom 7.3 percent of those with family incomeof lessthan $10,000to 2.8 percentof thosewith family incomeof $35,000 or more.

Number of dental visits in past year

In the pastyear, 42.7 percentof all Americanshadthe one or two dental visits recommendedby dentists.Not all of these visits werefor routinecleaningand examination.They included emergencies,treatmentof problemsdiscoveredin earliervisits, orthodonture,and other types of nonroutinecare. An almost identical proportion, 42.2 percent,had no dental visits in the pastyear.The remainderof personsweredividedbetweenthose with three or four visits (8.7 percent)and thosewith five visits or more(6.4 percent).Threedentalvisits or moreper year may be an indicator of poor dentalhealth.

Youths age5-l 7 years were more likely than personsof any other agesto havehad one or two dental visits in the past year (53.9 percent) and were also the most likely to have had five dentalvisits or more(9.0 percent).The largeproportionof youths with multiple dental visits may have been associated with appointmentsfor orthodonture.

Femaleswere more likely than males to have made five dental visits or more in the past year (7.3 versus5.5 percent), as were white personsmore likely than black personsto have doneso (6.8 comparedwith 4.1 percent).The numberof dental visits in the past year variedwith income,as well. The propor­

tion of individuals with five visits or more in the past year was overtwice ashigh (8.9 percent)for thosewith family incomeof

$35,000 or more as for those with family income of less than

$10,000 (4.1 percent).

Resultsof the 1986NHIS dental surveywill be presented

in detail in an upcomingSeries10 report.

(17)

References

‘World Health Organization: Manual of the International Statistical Classification of Diseases, Injuries, and Causes of Death, basedon the Recommendationsof the Ninth Revision Conference,1975. Ge­

neva.World Health Organization, 1977.

2National Center for Health Statistics, P. Ries: Current estimates from the National Health Interview Survey, United States, 1984. Vital and Health Statistics. Series 10, No. 156. DHHS Pub. No. (PHS) 86-1584. Public Health Service. Washington. U.S. Government Printing Office, Aug. 1986.

3National Center for Health Statistics,A. J. Moss and V. L. Parsons:

Current estimatesfrom the National Health Interview Survey, United States, 1985. VitulandHeulth Stututics. Series10, No. 160. DHHS Pub. No. (PHS) 86-1588. Public Health Service.Washington. U.S.

GovernmentPrinting Office, Sept. 1986.

4National Centerfor Health Statistics,P. F. Adams: Acute conditions and restricted activity during the 1985-1986 influenza season. Ad­

vance Data From Vital and Health Statistics. No. 132. DHHS Pub.

No. (PHS) 87-1250. Public Health Service. Hyattsville, Md., Mar.

27, 1987.

SNationalCenterfor Health Statistics,T. McLemore and J. DeLozier.

1985 summary,National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey. Advance Data From Vital and Health Statistics. No. 128. DHHS Pub. No.

(PHS) 87-1250. Public Health Service, Hyattsville, Md., Jan. 23, 1987.

‘jNationa1 Center for Health Statistics: Current estimates from the National Health Interview Survey, United States, 1982. Vital and Health Statistics. Series 10, No. 150. DHHS Pub. No. (PHS) 85-

1578. Public Health Service.Washington.U.S. GovernmentPrinting Oflice, Sept. 1985.

7National Center for Health Statistics, B. Bloom: Current estimates from the National Health Interview Survey,United States, 1981. Vital and Health Statistics. Series 10, No. 141. DHHS Pub. No. (PHS) 83-1569. Public Health Service. Washington. U.S. Government Printing Oftice, Oct. 1982.

Statistics. No. 122. DHHS Pub. No. (PHS) 86-1250. Public Health Service.Hyattsville, Md., Aug. 8, 1986.

r”T. F. Moore: Redesign of the National Health Interview Survqv.

Statistical Methods Division Methodological Memorandum Series.

Report Number CB/SMD/MM/85/02. Unpublishedtechnical paper.

U.S. Bureau of the Census,Aug. 1, 1985.

“National Center for Health Statistics,M. G. Kovar and G. S. Poe:

The National Health Interview Survey design, 1973-84, and pro­

cedures, 1975-83. Vital and Health Statistics. Series 1, No. 18.

DHHS Pub. No. (PHS) 85-1320. Public Health Service.Washington.

U.S. GovernmentPrinting OfIke, Aug. 1985.

r2National Center for Health Statistics,D. A. Koons: Quality control and measurementof nonsamplingerror in the Health Interview Survey.

Vital and Health Statistics. Series2, No. 54. DHEW Pub.No. (HSM) 73-1328. Health Servicesand Mental Health Administration. Wash­

ington. U.S. GovernmentPrinting Office, Mar. 1973.

r3National Center for Health Statistics, E. Balamuth and S. Shapiro:

Health interview responsescompared,withmedical records. Vital and Health Statistics. Series2, No. 7. PHS Pub. No. 1000. Public Health Service.Washington.U.S. GovernmentPrinting Office, July 1965.

14NationalCenterfor Health Statistics,W. G. Madow: Interview data on chronic conditionscomparedwith informationderivedfrom medical records. Vital and Health Statistics. Series2, No. 23. PHS Pub. No.

1000. Public Health Service.Washington.U.S. GovernmentPrinting Ofice, May 1967.

r5National Center for Health Statistics, C. F. Cannell, F. J. Fowler, Jr., and K. H. Marquis: The influence of interviewer and respondent psychologicaland behaviorial variables on the reporting in household interviews. Vital and Health Statistics. Series2, No. 26. PHS Pub.

No. 1000. Public Health Service. Washington. U.S. Government Printing Ofice, Mar. 1,968.

16NationalCenterfor Health Statistics,C. F. Cannel1and F. J. Fowler, Jr.: Comparisonof hospitalizationreportingin threesurveyprocedures.

Vital and Health Statistics. Series 2, No. 8. PHS Pub. No. 1000.

(18)

List of detailed tables

Incidence of acute conditions Rates

1. Number of acute conditions per 100 personsper year, by age and type of condition: United States,1986 . . . 16 2. Number of acute conditions per 100 personsper year, by

sex, age,and type of condition: United States, 1986 . . . 17 3. Number of acute conditions per 100 personsper year, by

race, age,and type of condition: United States, 1986 . . , . . 18 4. Number of acute conditions per 100 personsper year, by

family income, age, and type of condition: United States, 1986 ,....,... . . . 19 5. Number of acute conditions per 100 personsper year, by

geographicregion,placeof residence,and type of condition:

United States,1986 . . . 21

Frequencies

6. Number of acute conditions, by age and type of condition:

United States,1986 . . . 22 7. Number of acuteconditions,by sex, age,and type of condi­

tion: United States,1986.. . . . 23 8. Number of acuteconditions, by race, age,and type of con­

dition: United States,1986 . . . 24 9. Number of acute conditions, by family income, age, and

type of condition: United States,1986.. . . . 25 10. Number of acute conditions,by geographicregion, place of

residence,and type of condition: United States,1986. . . 27

Percent of acute conditions medically attended

Restricted activity associated with acute conditions

Restricted-activity days: Rates

16. Number of restricted-activity days associatedwith acute conditions per 100 personsper year, by age and type of condition: United States,1986 . . . 34 17. Number of restricted-activity days associatedw&h acute

conditions per 100 personsper year, by sex, age,and type of condition: United States,1986. . . , . . . 35 18. Number of restricted-activity days associatedwith acute

conditionsper 100 personsper year, by race, age,and type of condition: United States, 1986.. . . . 36 19. Number of restricted-activity days associatedwith acute

conditionsper 100 personsper year, by famiIy income,age, and type of condition: United States,1986.. . . . 37 20. Number of restricted-activity days associatedwith acute

conditionsper 100 personsper year, by geographicregion, place of residence,and type of condition: 1986 . . . 39 Restricted-activity days: Frequencies

21. Number of restricted-activity days associatedwith acute conditions, by age and type of condition: United States, 1986... 40 22. Number of restricted-activity days associatedwith acute

conditions, by sex, age, and type of condition: United States,1986.. . . . 41 23. Number of restricted-activity days associatedwith acute

conditions, by race, age, and type of condition: United States,1986... 42 24. Number of restricted-activity days associatedwith acute

conditions, by family income, age, and type of condition:

United States,1986 . . . 43 25. Number of restricted-activity days associatedwith acute

conditions, by geographicregion, place of residence,and

(19)

29. Number of bed days associatedwith acute conditions per 100 personsper year, by family income, age, and type of condition: United States,1986 . . . 30. Number of bed days associatedwith acute conditions per 100 personsper year, by geographicregion, place of resi­

dence,and type of condition: United States,1986 . . . Bed days: Frequencies

3 1. Number of bed days associatedwith acute conditions, by age and type of condition: United States,1986 . . . , . . 32. Number of bed days associatedwith acute conditions, by sex, age,and type of condition: United States,1986 . . . 33. Number of bed days associatedwith acute conditions, by race, age,and type of condition: United States,1986 . . . 34. Number of bed days associatedwith acute conditions, by family income, age, and type of condition: United States, 1986...,...

35. Number of bed days associatedwith acute conditions, by geographicregion,placeof residence,and type of condition:

United States,1986 ,...

Work-loss days: Rates

36. Number of work-lossdays associatedwith acuteconditions per 100 currently employed persons 18 years of age and over, by age and type of condition: United States,1986 . . . 37. Number of work-lossdays associatedwith acuteconditions per 100 currently employed persons 18 years of age and over, by sex, age, and type of condition: United States, 1986.. . . . , . . . . , . . . 38. Number of work-lossdays associatedwith acute conditions per 100 currently employed persons 18 years of age and over, by race, age, and type of condition: United States,

1986...

39. Number of work-lossdays associatedwith acuteconditions per 100 currently employed persons 18 years of age and over, by family income, age, and type of condition: United States,1986...

40. Number of work-lossdays associatedwith acuteconditions per 100 currently employed persons 18 years of age and over, by geographicregion, place of residence,and type of condition: United States,1986 . . . , . . . , . Work-loss days: Frequencies

41. Number of work-lossdays associatedwith acuteconditions for currently employed persons 18 years of age and over, by age and type of condition: United States,1986. . .

49

5 1

52 53 54

55

57

58

59

60

61

62

63

School-loss days: Rates

46. Number of school-lossdays associatedwith acute condi­

tions per 100 youths 15-17 years of age, by sex, race, family income, and type of condition: United States,

1986...,... 68 47. Number of school-lossdays associatedwith acute condi­

tions per 100 youths 5-17 years of age, by geographic region, place of residence,and type of condition: United States,1986. . . ..a... 69 School-loss days: Frequencies

48. Number of school-lossdays associatedwith acute condi­

tions for youths 5-17 years of age, by sex, race, family income, and type of condition: United States,1986. . . 70 49. Number of school-lossdays associatedwith acute condi­

tions for youths 5-17 years of age, by geographicregion, place of residence,and type of condition: United States, 1986... 71

Incidence of acute conditions by quarter

50. Number of acute conditions per 100 personsper year and number of acute conditions, by quarter and type of condi­

tion: United States,1986.. . . . , . . . 72

Episodes of persons injured and associated restriction of activity 51.

52.

53.

54.

55.

Number of episodes.of persons injured per 100 persons per year, by whether in moving motor vehicle, whether at work, place of accident, and sociodemographiccharacter­

istics: United States,1986.. . . . 73

Number of episodes of persons injured, by whether in

moving motor vehicle, whether at work, place of accident,

and sociodemographic characteristics: United States,

1986 . . . ..*... 75

Number of restricted-activitydays associatedwith episodes

of persons injured per 100 personsper year, by whether

in moving motor vehicle,whetherat work, place of accident,

and sociodemographic characteristics: United States,

1986... 77

Number of restricted-activitydays associatedwith episodes

of persons injured, by whether in moving motor vehicle,

whether at work, place of accident, and sociodemographic

characteristics:United States,1986.. . . . 79

Number of bed days associatedwith episodesof persons

(20)

58. Number of selectedreported chronic conditions per 1,000 persons,by sex and age:United States,1986. . . 87 59. Number of selectedreported chronic conditions per 1,000

persons,by race and age:United States,1986 . . . , . . . 89 60. Number of selectedreported chronic conditions per 1,000

persons,by family income and age:United States,1986 . . . 91 61. Number of selectedreported chronic conditions per 1,000

persons, by geographic region and place of residence:

United States,1986 .,,...,...*. . . . 95 Frequencies

62. Number of selected reported chronic conditions, by age:

United States, 1986 . . . ..*... 97 63. Number of selectedreportedchronic conditions,by sex and

age:United States, 1986 . . . . ..*... 99 64. Number of selected reported chronic conditions, by race

and age:United States,1986 . . . , . . . 101 65. Number of selectedreported chronic conditions, by family

income and age:United States, 1986.. . . . 103 66. Number of selected reported chronic conditions, by geo­

graphic region and place of residence: United States, 1986 . . . ..*... 107

Limitation of activity due to chronic conditions

67. Percent distribution of persons with limitation of activity due to chronic conditions, by degreeof limitation accord­

ing to sociodemographiccharacteristics: United States, 1986... 109 68. Number of personswith limitation of activity due to chronic

conditions,by degreeof limitation accordingto sociodemo graphiccharacteristics:United States,1986 . . . 111

Restricted activity associated with acute and chronic conditions

69. Number of days per personper year and number of days of activity restriction due to acute and chronic conditions, by type of restriction and sociodemographiccharacteristics:

United States, 1986 . . . ..*... 113

Respondent-assessed health status

70. Number of personsand percentdistribution by respondent­

assessedhealth status,accordingto so&demographic char­

acteristics:United States,1986 . . .

Physician contacts

7 1. Number per personper year and number of physician con­

tacts, by place of contact and sociodemographiccharacter­

istics: United States, 1986.*...

72. Percent distribution and number of persons by interval sincelast physician contact, accordingto sociodemographic characteristics:United States,1986. . . , . . .

Hospitalization

73. Percent distribution of living personsby number of short- stay hospital episodesduring the year precedinginterview for all causesand excluding deliveries, accordingto socio­

demographiccharacteristics:United States,1986 . . . 74. Number of living persons,by number of short-stayhospital episodesduring the year precedinginterview for all causes and excluding deliveries and by sociodemographiccharac­

teristics: United States,1986 . . . 75. Number of short-stayhospital days during the year preced­

ing interview per living person hospitalized for all causes and excluding deliveries,by number of episodesand socio­

demographiccharacteristics:United States, 1986 . . . 76. Number of short-stayhospital days during the year preced­

ing interview for living personshospitalized for all causes and excluding deliveries,by number of episodesand socio­

demographiccharacteristics:United States, 1986 . . . 77. Number per 100 personsper year and annual number of short-stay hospital discharges,averagelength of stay and annual number of hospital days for living personshospital­

ized for all causesand excluding deliveries,by sociodemo­

graphic characteristics:United States,1986 . . .

Population

78. Number of personsand number of currently employedper­

sons 18 years of age and over, by sociodemographicchar­

acteristics:United States,1986 . . . 115

117

119

121

123

125

127

129

131

(21)

TABLE

1.

N U W S E R OF ACUTE CONDITIONS PER

100

PERSONS PER YEAR, LtY AGE AND TYPE OF CONDITION: UNITeD STATES, 1966

(DATA ARE BASED O N HOUSEHOLD INTERVIEWS OF THE CIVILIAN NONINSTITUTIONALIZED POPULATION. THE SURVEY cE:iIGh, GENERAL OUALIFICATIUNS, AND INFORMATION O N THE RELIABILITY OF THE ESTIMATES ARE GIVEN IN APPENDIX

I.

OEFINITIONS OF TERMS ARE GIVEN IN APPENOIX II1

45 YEARS AND O V E R

ALL U N D E R 5-17 18-24 25-44 45-64 b5 YEARS

TYPE OF ACUTE CONDITION AGES 5 YEARS YEARS YEARS YEARS TOTAL YEARS AND O V E R

N U M B E R OF ACUTE CONDITIONS PER

100

PERSONS PER YEAR

ALL ACUTE CONDITIONS ... 189.8 360.4 260.0 195.1 168.6 122.9 125.1 119.5

INFECTIVE AND PARASITIC

DISEASES ...

23.0 55.5 39.9 19.6 19.5 9.2 9.5 a.8

C O W O N CHILDHOOD DISEASES ... 1.9

10.0

5.2 5- CO.4 *- a- *-

INTESTINAL VIRUS, UNSPECIFIED ...

VIRAL INFECTIONS, UNSPECIFIED ...

4.0

10.1 9.1

21.7

6.1 17.9

“4.4 6.0

3.6 8.9

tl.8 5.1

41.6 5.8

*2.2 r3.s

OTHER ... 7.0 14.8 10.6 9.2 6.6 2.3 $2.1 92.8

RESPIRATORY CONDITIONS... 96.8 177.9 139.5 98.5 86.8 59.6 66.7 48.2

C O H H O N COLD ... 26.8 77.3 36.3 26.7 20.2 15.1 14.3 lb.3

OTHER ACUTE UPPER RESPIRATORY INFECTIONS ... 9.2 19.3 14.9

11.1

6.8 5.0 6.0 “3.2

INFLUENZA ... 55.2 63.9 82.3 57.0 55.7 35.0 42.7 22.5

ACUTE BRONCHITIS ... 2.7 $6.3 3.2 *1.6 1.9 2.6 $1.8 43.9

PNEUMONIA ...

1.1

04.2 CO.6 *-

01.1 Cl.1

$0.8

01.5

OTHER RESPIRATORY

CONDITIONS ... 1.8

06.8 “2.1 92.1

S1.O

90.9

01.0

110.7

OIGESTIVE SYSTEM CONDITIONS ... 6.3 8.2 8.3 7.2 5.1 5.6 4.5 7.3

DENTAL CONDITIONS ... 1.3 *3.4 e1.2 t1.7 *1.5 00.4 to.3 $0.5

INOIGESTIONt

NAUSEA, AN0 VOMITING ... 3.4 03.2 6.6 33.5 2.4 2.4 02.2 32.b

OTHER DIGESTIVE CONDITIONS ... 1.7 01.6 itQ.6 “1.9 *1.2 2.8 S2.0 $4.2

INJURIES ... 27.2 23.4 34.5 32.9 27.9 20.8 20.4 21.3

FRACTURES AND DISLOCATIONS ... 3.5 31.5 5.9 *2.0 3.8 2.8 3.8 “1.3

SPRAINS AND STRAINS ... 5.2 *- 5.0 8.3 6.0 4.7 5.5 83.4

O P E N W O U N D S AND LACERATIONS ... 6.9 10.4 11.9 7.3 5.7 3.9 4.0 43.7

CONTUSIONS AND SUPERFICIAL INJURIES ... 6.4 06.7 9.2 6.9 4.2 ea.1 6.0

OTHER CURRENT INJURIES ... 5.2 “4.9 2: 6.2 5.4 5.2 4.1 6.9

SELECTED OTHER ACUTE CONDITIONS ... 26.0 82.1 2a.9 26.8 21.5 14.5 12.7 17.6

EYE CONDITIONS ...

ACUTE EAR INFECTIONS ...

1.3 8.0

*3.7 =Q.7

31.1

53.0

10.1 91.9

00.5 4.4

2.1 Cl.2

01.5

Dl.0

*3 .o 01.4

OTHER EAR CONDITIONS ... 1.7 *7.2 02.6

11.1

30.6 *1.2 30.7 *2.1

ACUTE URINARY CONDITIONS ... 2.3

"1.1

91.4

=5.1

91.8 2.6 e2.9 *2*1

DISORDERS OF MENSTRUATION ... 1.0

. . . "1.0 $3.1

Cl.2 =o. 1 *o-2 *-

OTHER DISORDERS OF FEMALE GENITAL TRACT ... 0.9

3-

CO.8 =2.6 Cl.5 *- a- o-

OELIVERY AND OTHER

CONDITIONS

OF PREGNANCY AND

PUERPERIUH ... 1.9 00.2 5.7 3.8 +- *- . . .

SKIN CONDITIONS ... 2.4 G6.8 iC2.0 91.7 =1.7 2.5 ll.6 “4.1

ACUTE HUSCULOSKELETAL CONDITIONS ... 3.0 eo.5 41.8 32.7 3.7 3.7 3.5 *4.0

HEADACHE, EXCLUDING MIGRAINE ...

FEVER, UNSPECIFIED ...

1.6 2.1

30.6 32.3 .I.1

9.3 6.2 30.7

2.0

=Q.3

91.1

5-

31.3 *-

01.0

4-

ALL OTHER ACUTE CONDITIONS... 10.4 13.1 9.0 10.2 7.8

13.2

11.3

16.3

NOTES: EXCLUDED FROH THESE ESTIMATES ARE CONDITIONS INVOLVING NEITHER HEDICAL ATTENTION N O R ACTIVITY RESTRICTION.

THE STANDARD E R R O R S AND RELATIVE STANDARD E R R O R S (RSE’S) CAN BE C O M P U T E D BY USING PARAMETER SET

I

OF TASLE

1,

THE FREQUENCIES OF TABLE 6 AND THE FORMULA PRESENTED IN RULE 2 OF APPENDIX

I.

ESTIMATES FOR WHICH THE N U M E R A T O R HAS AN RSE OF M O R E THAN 30 PeRCENT ARE INDICATED WITH AN ASTERISK.

References

Related documents

Number of restricted-activity days associatedwith acute race, age,and type of condition: United States, 1984.. Number of acute conditions per 100 personsper year, by

Average annual number of days ofrestricted activity, bed disability, and work loss, and number of days of restricted activity, bed disability, and work loss per 100 persons per

1. Incidence of acute conditions, percent distribution, and number of acute conditions per 100 persons per year by condition group, according to sex: United States, July 1976-June

Days lost from school associated with acute conditions and days lost from school per 100 children (6-16 Years) per year, by sex and condition group: United States, July 1975-June

Days of bed disability associated with acute conditions per quarter and days of bed disability per 1 (X) persons perquatier, bysexand age: United States, July l97&Junel974. Days

United States, July 1972-June l973--- Days of bed disability associated with acute conditions and days of bed disabil- ity per 100 persons per year, by geographic region, se::,and

13 Days lost from school associated with acute conditions and days lost from school per 100 children (6-16 years) per year, by sex and condition gToup: United States, 1973. 14 Days

United States, July 1971-June l972--- Days ofbed disability associated with acute conditions and days of bed disability per 100 persons per year, by geographic region, sex,and