• No results found

6. Referências bibliográficas:

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Share "6. Referências bibliográficas:"

Copied!
11
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

ADORNO, Theodor W. Hegel: three studies. Cambridge Massachusetts, MIT Press,1994.

___________________ & HORKHEIMER, Max. Dialética do Esclarecimento. Rio de Janeiro, Zahar 1985.

ALMEIDA, João Marques de. Challenging Realism by Returning to History:

The British Committee’s Contribution to IR Forty Years On. In Conferência anual da British International Studies Association (BISA), 1999.

ANDERSON, Perry. O fim da história: de Hegel a Fukuyama. Rio de Janeiro, Zahar 1992.

ARENDT, Hannah. A vida do espírito: o pensar, o querer, o julgar. Rio de Janeiro, Relume Dumará, 2002.

AVINERI, Shlomo. Hegel’s Theory of the Modern State. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1972

BARNARD, F.M. Herder on Social and Political Culture. Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1969

BEISER, Frederick C. Hegel’s historicism In BEISER, F. (ed.). The Cambridge Companion to Hegel. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press 1993.

BENHABIB, Seyla. Autonomy, Modernity and Community: communitarianism and critical social theory In: HONNETH, Axel et allii. Cultural-political interventions in the unfinished project of Enlightenment. MIT, 1992.

BERLIN, Isaiah. Herder e o Iluminismo In Vico e Herder. Brasília, Ed. da UnB, 1979.

BINOCHE, Bertrand. Les trois sources de la philosophie de l’histoire (1764-1798). Paris, PUF, 1994.

BOBBIO, Norberto & BOVERO, Michelangelo. Sociedade e Estado na filosofia política moderna. São Paulo, Brasiliense, 1991.

BOUCHER, David. Political Theories of International Relations: From Thucydides to the Present. New York: Oxford UP, 1998.

PUC-Rio - Certificação Digital Nº 0210264/CA

(2)

BROWN, Chris. International Relations Theory: new normative approaches. New York, Columbia University Press, 1992.

____________. International Political Theory and the Idea of World Society In Booth & Smith. International Relations Theory Today. Cambridge, Polity Press, 1995.

____________. Universal Human Rights: a critique In Wheeler & Dunne.

Human Rights in Global Politics. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1999.

BULL, Hedley. Teoria das Relações Internacionais – defesa da abordagem clássica In BRAILLARD, Philippe. Teoria das Relações Internacionais.

Lisboa, Fundação Calouste Gulbenkian, 1990.

____________. A sociedade anárquica. Brasília, Ed. da UnB/ IPRI, 2002 ____________. Society and Anarchy in International Relations. In BUTTERFIELD, H.; WIGHT, M. (eds.). Diplomatic Investigations: Essays in the Theory of International Politics. London: G. Allen, 1966.

____________. (1979) Natural Law and International Relations In HURRELL

& ALDERSON. Hedley Bull on International Society. New York, St. Martin, 2000.

____________. The Grotian Conception of International Society. In BUTTERFIELD, H.; WIGHT, M. (eds.). Diplomatic Investigations: Essays in the Theory of International Politics. London: G. Allen, 1966.

BULL, Hedley & WATSON, Adam. The Expansion of International Society.

Oxford, Oxford University Press 1984.

BURBIDGE, John. Hegel’s conception of Logic In BEISER, F. (ed.). The Cambridge Companion to Hegel. Cambridge, University Press, 1993.

BUTTERFIELD, H. The Balance of Power. In: BUTTERFIELD, H.; WIGHT, M.

(eds.). Diplomatic Investigations: Essays in the Theory of International Politics. London: G. Allen, 1966.

________________ & WIGHT, M. Diplomatic Investigations: Essays in the Theory of International Politics. Londres, G. Allen, 1966.

BUZAN, Barry. The English School as a research program: an overview and a proposal for recovering. Paper apresentado à reunião da BISA, dezembro. 1999.

PUC-Rio - Certificação Digital Nº 0210264/CA

(3)

__________. Rethinking the Solidarist – Pluralist Debate in English School Theory. Paper apresentado à reunião da BISA, 2002.

__________. From International System to International Society: structural realism and regime theory meet the English School. In: International Organization. n.º 47, 1993a.

BUZAN, B.; JONES, C. & LITTLE, R. The Logic of Anarchy. New York, Columbia University Press, 1993b.

BUZAN, Barry & LITTLE, Richard. International Systems in World History.

Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2001

___________. Why International Relations has failed as an intellectual project? In: Millennium, Londres, London School of Economics, 2001; v. 30, n. º 1.

BUZAN, WAEVER & DE WILDE. Security – A new framework of analysis.

Londres, Lynne Pienner Publishers, 1998

CARDOSO, C. & VAINFAS, R. Domínios da História: ensaios de metodologia. Rio de Janeiro, Campus, 1997.

CARR, E. H. Vinte Anos de Crise. Brasília, Ed. da UnB/IPRI, 2001.

__________. O que é História? Rio de Janeiro, Paz e Terra, 1978.

CASSIRER, Ernst. O mito do Estado. Rio de Janeiro, Zahar, 1976.

CLARK, Ian; NEUMANN, Iver. B. (org.). Classical Theories of International Relations. New York: St. Martin, 1996.

COLLINGWOOD, R. G. A idéia de História. Lisboa, ed. Presença, 1981.

COPELAND, David C. A Realist Critique of the English School. In: Review of International Studies, v. 29, 2003.

COX, Robert. Social Forces, States and World Orders: Beyond International Relations Theory. In KEOHANE, R. O. (org.). Neorealism and its critics.

New York, Columbia University Press, 1986.

DOSSE, François. A história em migalhas. Campinas, Editora da Unicamp, 1994.

DOSTAL, Robert (ed.). The Cambridge Companion to Gadamer.

Cambridge, University Press, 2002.

PUC-Rio - Certificação Digital Nº 0210264/CA

(4)

DUNNE, Tim. Inventing International Society: A History of the English School. New York: St. Martin, 1998.

ELIAS, Norbert. O Processo civilizador. Rio de Janeiro, Zahar, 1990. 2 v.

FINNEMORE, Martha. Exporting the English School? Review of International Studies, v.27, 2001.

FONTES, Virgínia. História e Modelos. In: CARDOSO, C. & VAINFAS, R.

Domínios da história: ensaios de teoria e metodologia. Rio de Janeiro, Campus, 1997.

FORSTER, Michael. Hegel’s dialectical method. In BEISER, F. (ed.). The Cambridge Companion to Hegel. Cambridge, University Press, 1993.

FORSYTH, M.G. & SAVIGEAR, P. The Theory of International Relations:

selected texts from Gentili to Treitschke. Londres: G. Allen. 1970

FROST, Mervin. Towards a Normative Theory of International Relations.

Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1986.

FUKUYAMA, Francis. O fim da História e o último homem. Rio de Janeiro, Rocco, 1992.

GADAMER, Hans-Georg. Hegel’s Dialectic: five hermeneutical studies.

New Haven, Yale University Press, 1971.

______________________. Historicidade. In: História e Historicidade.

Lisboa, Gradiva, 1988.

GILPIN, Robert. War and Change in world politics. Cambridge, University Press, 1983.

GRAMSCI, Antonio. A concepção dialética da História. Rio de Janeiro, Civilização Brasileira, 1966.

GROTIUS, Hugo. De Jure Belli ac Pacis. Prolegomena. In : FORSYTH, M.G.

& SAVIGEAR, P. The Theory of International Relations: selected texts from Gentili to Treitschke. Londres: G. Allen. 1970

HABERMAS, Jürgen. Discurso filosófico da modernidade. São Paulo, Martins Fontes, 2002.

HALL, Martin. International Relations and World History. In: European Journal of International Relations. v. 8; n. º 4, 2002.

PUC-Rio - Certificação Digital Nº 0210264/CA

(5)

HALL, Rodney B. National Collective Identity – Social Constructs and International Systems. New York, Columbia University Press. 1999.

HEGEL, G. W. F. La Phénoménologie de l’Esprit. Paris, Editions Montaigne, 1941.

______________. System of Ethical Life. New York, State University Press, 1979.

______________. Elements of a Philosophy of Right. Cambridge, University Press, 1991

______________. On the Scientific Ways of Treating Natural Law, on its Place in Practical Philosophy, and its Relation to the Positive Sciences of Right. In: NISBET & DICKEY (org.) Political Writings. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1999.

______________. Filosofia da História. Brasília, ed. da UnB, 2002.

HOBSON & HOBDEN. Historical Sociology of International Relations.

Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2002

HONNETH, Axel. Moral Development and Social Struggle: Hegel’s Early Social-philosophical Doctrines. In Honneth et allii, Cultural-political Interventions in the Unfinished Project of Enlightenment. Cambridge (Massachusset), MIT Press 1992.

_______________. The Struggle for Recognition: a Moral Grammar of Social Conflicts. Cambridge (Massachusetts), MIT Press, 1996.

HONNETH, A. & JOAS, H. Social Action and Human Nature. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1989.

HORKHEIMER, Max. Les débuts de la philosophie burgeoise de l’histoire. Paris, Editions Payot, 1974.

HUCHTINGS, K. International Political Theory: Rethinking Ethics in a Global Era. Londres, Sage, 1999.

HURRELL, Andrew. Keeping history, law and political philosophy firmly within the English School. Review of International Studies, v. 27, 2001.

HURRELL, A. & ALDERSON, K. (org.). Hedley Bull on International Society. New York: St. Martin, 2000.

PUC-Rio - Certificação Digital Nº 0210264/CA

(6)

______________________________. Bull’s Conception of International Society. In HURRELL & ALDERSON (org.). Hedley Bull on International Society. New York: St. Martin, 2000.

______________________________. International Society and the Academic Study of International Relations. In HURRELL & ALDERSON (org.). Hedley Bull on International Society. New York: St. Martin, 2000.

______________________________. The Continuing Relevance of International Society. In HURRELL & ALDERSON (org.). Hedley Bull on International Society. New York: St. Martin, 2000.

HYPPOLITE, Jean. Genese et Structure de la Phénoménologie de l’Esprit de Hegel. Paris, Aubier-Montaigne, 1974

_______________. Etudes sur Hegel et Marx. Paris, Librairie Marcel Rivière et cie., 1955.

_______________. Logique et Existence. Paris, Presses Universitaires de France, 1961.

_______________. Introduction à la philosophie de l’histoire de Hegel.

Paris, Editions Marcel Rivière et cie., 1968.

INWOOD, Michael. Dicionário Hegel. Rio de Janeiro, Jorge Zahar, 1997.

IGGERS, Georg. G. The German Conception of History: the national tradition of historical thought from Herder to the present. Hanover, Wesleyan University, 1988.

JACKSON, Robert. The Global Covenant: Human Conduct in a World of States. New York, Oxford University Press, 2000.

JONES, R. J. Barry. The English School and the Political Construction of International Society. In ROBERSON, B. A. (org.). International Society and the Development of International Relations Theory. London, Continuum, 2001.

JONES, Roy. The English School of International Relations: A Case for Closure. Review of International Studies, v.7, nº1, 1981.

JURIST, Elliot L. Beyond Hegel and Nietzsche: philosophy, culture and agency. Cambridge (Massachusetts), MIT Press, 2000.

KAPLAN, Morton. Tradicionalismo contra ciência em Relações Internacionais. In BRAILLARD, Philippe. Teoria das Relações Internacionais. Lisboa, Fundação Calouste Gulbenkian, 1990.

PUC-Rio - Certificação Digital Nº 0210264/CA

(7)

KEENE, E. Beyond the Anarchical Society. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2002.

_________. The dualistic Grotian Conception of International Society.

Paper apresentado à reunião da BISA, 2001

KEOHANE, Robert. International Institutions: two approaches. In International Studies Quartely. 1988, v. 32, n.º 4

________________ (ed.) Neorealism and its critics. New York, Columbia University Press, 1986.

KYMLICKA, Will. Communitarianism. In: Contemporary political philosophy. Oxford, University Press,1990.

KINGSBURY, Benedict. Grotius, Law and Moral Scepticism: Theory and Practice in the Thought of Hedley Bull. In CLARK, I. & NEUMANN I. B.

(orgs.). Classical Theories of International Relations. New York, St.

Martin, 1996.

KOJÈVE, Alexandre. Introdução à leitura de Hegel. Rio de Janeiro, Ed. Uerj e Contraponto, 2002.

KOLB, David. The Critique of Pure Modernity: Hegel, Heidegger and after. Chicago, Chicago University Press, 1986.

KONDER, Leandro. Hegel: a razão quase enlouquecida. Rio de Janeiro, Campus, 1991.

KOSELLECK, Reinhart. Le future passé: contribution à la sémanthique des temps historiques. Paris, Editions de l’ Ecole des Hautes Etudes en Sciences Sociales, 1990.

____________________. Le concept d’histoire. In L’expérience de l’histoire. Paris, Gallimard, 1997.

KRATOCHWIL, F. Constructivism as an Approach to Interdisciplinary Study.

In FIERKE & JORGENSEN (eds.). Constructing International Relations:

the next generations. Londres, M.E. Sharpe, 2001.

KRATOCHWIL, F. & LAPID, Y. The Return of Culture and Identity in IR Theory. Londres, Lynne Rinner Publishers, 1996.

LAPID, Yosef. The Third Debate: On the Prospects of International Theory in a Post-Positivist Era. In: International Studies Quarterly, v.33, nº3, 1989.

PUC-Rio - Certificação Digital Nº 0210264/CA

(8)

LINKLATER, Andrew. Hegel, the State and International Relations. In CLARK, I. & NEUMANN I. B. (orgs.) Classical Theories of International Relations. Londres, MacMillan, 1996.

___________________. Men and Citizen in the Theory of International Relations. New York, St. Martin’s Press, 1982.

____________________. Beyond Realism and Marxism. Londres, MacMillan, 1990.

____________________. Rationalism. In BURCHILL & LINKLATER, A.

Theories of International Relations. Houndmills, MacMillan, 1996.

____________________. The Transformation of Political Community:

Ethical Foundations of the Post-Westphalian Era. Columbia, University of South Carolina Press, 1998.

LLOYD, Christopher. As estruturas da história. Rio de Janeiro, Zahar, 1995.

MAPEL, David. & NARDIN, Terry. International Society. Diverse ethical perspectives. Princeton, Princeton University Press, 1998.

MARCUSE, Herbert. L’ontologie de Hegel et la théorie de l’historicité.

Paris, Editions Minuit, 1972.

_________________. Reason and Revolution. Boston, Beacon Press, 1978.

MARX, Karl. Introdução à crítica da economia política. In Os Pensadores.

São Paulo, Abril Cultural, 1974.

McSWEENEY, Bill. Security, Identity and Interests: Sociology of International Relations. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1999.

MORGENTHAU, Hans. A Política entre as nações. Brasília, Ed. da UnB/

IPRI, 2003.

ONUF, Nicholas. World of Our Making: Rules and Rule in Social Theory and International Relations. Columbia, University of South Carolina Press, 1989.

______________. Constructivism: A User’s Manual. In KUBÁLKOVÁ, V. et al.

(orgs.). International Relations in a Constructed World. New York, M. E.

Sharpe, 1998.

PUC-Rio - Certificação Digital Nº 0210264/CA

(9)

PACIS, Culturing International Relations Theory: a call for extension. In:

KRATOCHWIL, F. & LAPID, Y. The Return of Culture and Identity in IR Theory. Londres, Lynne Rienner Publishers, 1996.

PIPPIN, Robert. Gadamer’s Hegel. In: DOSTAL, Robert (ed.) The Cambridge Companion to Gadamer. Cambridge, University Press, 2002.

POPPER, Karl. A sociedade aberta e seus inimigos. São Paulo, EDUSP, 1974.

____________. The Poverty of Historicism. Londres, Routledge, 1986.

REIS, José Carlos. História & teoria – historicismo, modernidade, temporalidade e verdade. Rio de Janeiro, Ed. FGV, 2003.

ROBERSON B. A. (org.). International Society and the Development of International Relations Theory. London, Continuum, 2001.

RUGGIE, J. G. Continuity and Transformations in World Politics: towards a neorealist synthesis. In KEOHANE, R. (ed.) Neorealism and its critics. New York, Columbia University Press, 1986.

____________. Territoriality and Beyond: Problematizing Modernity in International Relations In International Organization, 1993 v. 47, n. º 1.

SHAPCOTT, Richard. Conversation and Coexistence: Gadamer and the Interpretation of International Society. Millennium: Journal of International Studies, v.23, nº4, 1994.

SKINNER, Quentin. As fundações do pensamento político moderno. São Paulo, Companhia das Letras, 1996.

SMITH, Steve. Positivism and beyond. In SMITH, S.; BOOTH, K. &

ZALEWSKI, M. (orgs.). International Theory: Positivism & beyond.

Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1996.

TAYLOR, Charles. Hegel. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press 1975.

_______________. Hegel and Modern Society. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1979.

_______________. Philosophical Arguments. Harvard University Press, 1995.

TUCK, Richard. Natural rights theories: their origin and development.

Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1993.

PUC-Rio - Certificação Digital Nº 0210264/CA

(10)

WAEVER, Ole. Four Meanings of International Society: A Trans-Atlantic Dialogue. In ROBERSON B. A. (org.). International Society and the Development of International Relations Theory. London, Continuum, 2001.

WALKER, Rob. Inside/Outside. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1993.

WALTZ, Kenneth. Theory of International Politics. Reading, Addison- Wesley, 1983.

__________. Structural Realism after the Cold War. International Security, v.25, nº1, 2000.

WARTENBERG, Thomas. Hegel’s idealism: the logic of conceptuality. In BEISER, F. (ed.). The Cambridge Companion to Hegel. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1993.

WATSON, Adam. The Evolution of International Society. Londres, Routledge, 1992

WENDT, Alexander. The Agent-structure Problem in International Relations Theory. In International Organization, v. 41; n. º 3, 1987.

________________. Anarchy is What States Make of it: The Social Construction of Power Politics. In International Organization, v. 46, nº2, 1992.

________________. Social Theory of International Politics. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1999.

WHEELER, Nicholas. Pluralist or Solidarist Conceptions of International Society: Bull and Vincent on Humanitarian Intervention. Millennium: Journal of International Studies, v. 21, n. º3, 1992.

WIGHT, Martin. Why is there no International Theory. In Diplomatic Investigations: Essays in the Theory of International Politics. Londres, G.

Allen 1966.

_____________. Western Values in International Relations. In:

BUTTERFIELD, H.; WIGHT, M. (org.). Diplomatic Investigations: Essays in the Theory of International Politics. London: G. Allen, 1966.

_____________. International Theory and the Three Traditions. London, Leicester University Press, 1991.

PUC-Rio - Certificação Digital Nº 0210264/CA

(11)

WILLIAMS, Robert R. Hegel’s Ethics of Recognition. Los Angeles, University of California Press, 1997.

____________________. Hegel e Nietzsche: reconhecimento e relação senhor/escravo In: ROSENFIELD, Denis (ed.) Estado e política na filosofia política de Hegel. Rio de Janeiro, Zahar, 2003.

WOOD, Allen. Hegel’s Ethical Thought. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1990.

_____________.Hegel’s ethics. In: The Cambridge Companion to Hegel.

Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1993.

PUC-Rio - Certificação Digital Nº 0210264/CA

References

Related documents

Tras la guerra contra la Triple Alianza, Corrientes nunca más pudo acercarse al Para- guay en busca de alguna alianza regional en el Alto Plata y, de allí en adelante, Buenos Aires y

In a population-based cohort of 350 homeless- experienced adults aged 50 years and older, we examined the prevalence of mobile phone (smartphones and feature phones), computer

Vice-President, Treasurer, Secretary: Any person who has successfully served as an officer or executive board member of a Section or has served on the IVS presidency, or has served

The fact that the forest fire detection can be developed in close collaboration with the observation of meteorological parameters and cloud properties, using the same satellite

right to claim maintenance under Section 125 of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973... Magistrate was erroneous in passing the order dismissing the application of 129/2015. Magistrate

 which didn didn ’ ’ t t really really matter matter, , seeing seeing as as it it had had stopped stopped raining raining by by the the time the first patrol

Bu alõştõrmalarda genel modelleme teknikleri, statik yüklemeler, çelik çerçeve boyutlandõrma, nonlineer zaman alanõ analizi ve statik itme analizleri tartõşõlacaktõr..

Farm: water supply including crop water demand at paddy field level and 30% water loss in field application; System: total water supply at system level, including crop water demand,