• No results found

Thin Client Installation at Gateway Community College, New Haven, CT

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Thin Client Installation at Gateway Community College, New Haven, CT"

Copied!
31
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

Thin Client Installation at

Gateway Community

(2)

Go to:

bit.ly/nercomp_desktop13

(3)

Gateway moved to a new facility in Sept. 2012. Previous facilities were outdated.

New facility projected to have far more

student traffic.

Used repurposed and rebuilt computers in key

public areas- Library and Student Services.

New equipment needed for these areas.

(4)

∗ Infrastructure was built from the ground up due to new campus construction.

∗ VDI server cluster- 4 Dell Power Edge 620’s, each

using RAID 50, with 2-73 GB hard drives and 96 GB of RAM.

∗ N+1 configuration- estimated to support up to 210 clients.

∗ Allows for significant growth in deployed clients.

∗ Associated storage- Dell EqualLogic 6100, provides 13TB of storage, using 2 more PowerEdge 620’s as a front end.

Hardware Selection and

Development

(5)
(6)

Recommendation of VMWare View 5 as

virtualization environment.

Standardization of software platform across

multiple colleges in an affiliated system.

Integrated solution from a single vendor

provided cost savings.

(7)

Samsung NC 190 all in one.

Previous excellent experience with Samsung

hardware.

Sturdy and utilitarian. Clean looking.

A bit heavy for our mounting monitor arms.

(8)
(9)
(10)
(11)
(12)

Server cluster install started in June 2012. Network and switch configuration delays

stalled this segment.

Database corruption and SSL certificate issues

were problematic.

Reinstallation of software in July 2012.

Then installed the Teradici console for thin

client management.

Started to create pools and thin client images.

(13)

Virtual Center installed on a dedicated server-

best practices advise this on installations of 5 or more hosts.

Allows us to grow the installation without

having to rebuild the cluster.

Vcenter allows us to provision a new VM from

our template.

Reduces deployment time from days to just

an hour or two.

Enables extensive proactive monitoring.

(14)
(15)

VM Ware HA (High Availability)

Provides high availability throughout the

cluster.

Set up as fully automated.

Sends alerts on relevant actions.

Works directly with DRS to assist in load

balancing.

(16)
(17)

Vmotion gives us the ability to migrate a VM

from one host to another in real time.

Transparent to the user.

Helps with proactive maintenance.

Can be used to augment automated load

balancing of VM Ware HA.

(18)
(19)

Storage Vmotion works similarly to V Motion,

but with the associated storage.

Clients that are on storage that develops

faults or failures are moved to another part of the cluster.

(20)
(21)

VM Ware DRS (Distributed Resource

Scheduler)

Also automated.

Performs a VM’s initial placement in the

cluster.

Optimizes VM locations in the cluster. Protects against server failure.

When DRS is used in conjunction with HA,

VM’s residing on a failed host will restart automatically on another host.

(22)
(23)

VM Ware Update Manager creates a snapshot

that can be used as a rollback in the event of a failed patch.

Works with Windows and Linux based VM’s Proactively patches some 3rd party

applications- MS, Adobe, Mozilla.

Also patches offline VM’s.

Installations- VM Ware Update

Manager

(24)

Installations- VM Ware Update

Manager

(25)

Installations- VM Ware Update

Manager

(26)

Host server network hardware configuration-

6 physical NIC’s configured for duplex.

Two NIC’s bound together for access to

cluster SAN.

Provides 2 GB of throughput per bound NIC. Enables load balancing and fault tolerance.

Installations- Physical Network

Access

(27)

Client pools are needed to provision custom

images.

Geographic and role based.

We used approximately 10 different pools-

Library classroom, Library Public area, Student Services departments, Student Self-Help area and Internet Café.

(28)

Database corruption caused numerous issues. Printing issues hampered student use.

Integration with new network technologies-

Cisco ISE, Infoblox, 4500 series switches.

Issues with USB ports and devices not being

recognized.

(29)

Tutorial websites don’t function as intended. Students can’t view optical media.

Student expectation of versatility with regard

to software.

Have sporadic problems losing their domain

trust relationship.

Antivirus software was problematic due to

accumulation of DAT’s.

(30)

Training, Training, Training!

Technical team must be hands on to get the

feel of the VDI system.

Network infrastructure must be rock solid. Start small, then grow your deployments. Manage user expectations.

ROI is long term, not short term.

(31)

Go to:

bit.ly/nercomp_desktop13

References

Related documents

First of all we would like to welcome you, glad to meet you again, and welcome to join the annual event PNusantara Heritage SeminarP which is the 6th international

Other topics such as keeping children out of the middle (5.8%), parenting skills and activities (5.4%), positive statements (3.8%), and helping children cope with emotions (3.1%)

225 negative mechanical limb work (W (-ve) ) done by the prosthetic and intact limbs to 226 terminate ramp-descent from slow and customary walking speeds for the MCon and. 227

Our primary aim was to determine whether the CRS was prognostic in women with tubo-ovarian HGSC treated with NACT. Secondary ob- jectives were to investigate whether i) the

The findings that the participants’ positive responses to the use of FBG for interpretative communication were lower than those to interpersonal communication

Randomized phase III study of panitumumab with fluorouracil, leucovorin, and irinotecan (FOLFIRI) compared with FOLFIRI alone as second-line treatment in patients with

RESUMO: Objetivo – Comparar a técnica convencional, a técnica de energias mistas e a técnica field-in-field com energias mistas, verificando a dose recebida nos órgãos de risco e

Mueller (1972) notes that this “separation of ownership and control” in large corporations implies that managers of these firms may have lower incentives to maximize shareholder