Global
and
Regional
Infrastructure,
Logistics
Costs,
and
Third
‐
Party
Logistics
Market
Trends
and
Analysis
January,
2014
Phone:
+1
‐
800
‐
525
‐
3915
Website:
www.3PLogistics.com
Email:
Dick@3PLogistics.com
© Copyright 2014 Armstrong & Associates, Inc. 2 | P a g e
ABOUT ARMSTRONG & ASSOCIATES, INC.
Armstrong
&
Associates,
Inc.
is
a
supply
chain
management
market
research
and
consulting
firm
specializing
in
strategic
planning,
logistics
outsourcing,
competitive
benchmarking,
mergers
and
acquisitions,
3PL
service/cost
benchmarking,
and
supply
chain
systems
evaluation
and
selection.
Armstrong
&
Associates
publishes
Who’s
Who
in
Logistics
and
Supply
Chain
Management
–
The
Americas
and
Who’s
Who
in
Logistics
and
Supply
Chain
Management
–
International
.
Recent
research
papers
include
"Slow
Dance
‐
2012
3PL
Market
Analysis
and
2013
Predictions,"
"3PL
Brand
Recognition,
RFP
Activity
and
Expected
Profit
Margins
for
3PLs
‐
2013,"
"Mexico:
Trucking,
Railroads
and
Third
‐
Party
Logistics
Market
Report,"
"The
Business
of
Warehousing
in
North
America
‐
2012
Market
Size,
Major
3PLs,
Benchmarking
Costs,
Prices
and
Practices"
and
"Trends
in
3PL/Customer
Relationships."
All
Rights
Reserved.
No
part
of
this
publication
may
be
reproduced,
stored
in
a
retrieval
system
or
transmitted
in
any
form
by
any
means,
electronic,
mechanical,
photocopied,
recorded
or
otherwise,
without
the
prior
permission
of
the
publisher,
Armstrong
&
Associates,
Inc.
The
facts
of
this
report
are
believed
to
be
correct
at
the
time
of
publication
but
cannot
be
guaranteed.
Please
note
that
the
findings,
conclusions
and
recommendations
that
Armstrong
&
Associates
delivers
will
be
based
on
information
gathered
in
good
faith
from
both
primary
and
secondary
sources,
whose
accuracy
we
are
not
always
in
a
position
to
guarantee.
As
such,
Armstrong
&
Associates
can
accept
no
liability
whatsoever
for
actions
taken
based
on
any
information
that
may
subsequently
prove
to
be
incorrect.
© Copyright 2014 Armstrong & Associates, Inc. 3 | P a g e
Table of Contents
Global and Regional Infrastructure
...
4
Brazil ... 5 India ... 6 China ... 7
Global Logistics Costs and Third‐Party Logistics Revenues
...
8
Third‐Party Logistics Market
...
12
3PL Revenue and Growth Rates Analysis
...
16
Major Region 3PL Market Growth Trends
...
19
Major Players in Third‐Party Logistics
...
24
Global Logistics Costs by Mode or Function
...
35
Appendix A ‐ Global Logistics Costs and Third‐Party Logistics Revenues 2010‐2014E
...
38
Appendix B ‐ APAC Market Comparisons
...
44
Appendix C ‐ Related 3PL Case Studies
...
47
Menlo Refines its China 3PL Model and Gains Business ... 48
DHL Supply Chain – What I Learned in China ... 55
UPS – What I Learned in China ... 61
UTi India – Emphasis on Growth ... 65
Chinese NVOCCs – Moving From Tactical to Strategic ... 76
Round The World Logistics & Supply Chain Management Ltd. ... 80
© Copyright 2014 Armstrong & Associates, Inc. 4 | P a g e
Global and Regional Infrastructure
Supply
chain
management
capabilities
vary
greatly
between
countries.
Differences
fall
into
two
major
categories:
1.)
information
flow
and
controls
2.)
physical
limitations.
Advanced
economies
generally
have
better
highways,
ports
and
railways
as
well
as
better
communication
systems
and
high
‐
tech.
Political
changes
can
especially
complicate
the
latter
but
normally
are
limited
to
emerging
market/developing
economy
countries.
As
a
general
rule,
logistics
costs
as
a
percent
of
gross
domestic
product
(GDP)
are
lower
in
advanced
economies
and
higher
in
emerging
market/developing
countries.
Table
1
presents
basic
infrastructure
results
for
15
countries.
Table 1. Global Transporta on ̶ Infrastructure (US$ Billions)
Country Rank by 2012 GDP¹ Size Roadways Rank Roadways km Railways Rank Railways km Waterways Rank Waterways km Pipelines Gas km 2012 3PL Revenue United States 15,650.0 1 6,506,204 1 224,792 4 41,009 1,984,321 141.8 China 8,227.0 3 4,106,387 3 86,000 1 110,000 48,502 118.4 Japan 5,964.0 6 1,210,251 11 27,182 45 1,770 4,456 53.2 Germany 3,401.0 11 645,000 6 41,981 19 7,467 26,985 31.5 France 2,609.0 8 1,028,446 9 29,640 16 8,501 15,322 26.0 United Kingdom 2,441.0 16 394,428 17 16,454 32 3,200 28,603 22.5 Brazil 2,396.0 4 1,580,964 10 28,538 3 50,000 17,312 25.0 Italy 2,014.0 14 487,700 13 20,255 37 2,400 20,223 20.8 India 1,825.0 2 4,689,842 4 63,974 9 14,500 13,581 16.6 Canada 1,819.0 7 1,042,300 5 46,552 78 636 100,000 16.6 Australia 1,542.0 9 823,217 7 38,445 43 2,000 30,054 16.5 Spain 1,352.0 10 683,175 19 15,293 65 1,000 10,481 13.0 Mexico 1,177.0 17 377,660 16 17,166 34 2,900 18,074 12.8 South Korea 1,156.0 44 104,983 52 3,381 51 1,600 2,216 11.5 Indonesia 878.2 13 496,607 35 5,042 6 21,579 11,702 6.8 ¹CIA official exchange rate GDPs (www.CIA.gov) ‐ The World Factbook ‐ 12/5/2013 Source: www.CIA.gov
Not
surprisingly,
the
countries
with
the
largest
economies
dominate
infrastructure
statistics.
The
United
States
has
the
most
kilometers
of
highways,
railways
and
pipelines.
China,
with
the
second
largest
economy,
has
the
third
largest
amounts
of
highways
and
railways.
India
is
second
in
the
total
kilometers
of
roadways.
However,
only
2
‐
3%
of
India's
roadways
are
modern
highways.
Even
some
of
these,
like
Highway
9
from
Mumbai
to
Pune,
have
uneven
surfaces
and
transportation
obstacles.
India
and
Brazil
both
have
railway
systems
with
different
gauges
making
railcar
and
locomotive
interchanges
impossible.
As
a
result,
the
rail
and
intermodal
abilities
are
compromised.
© Copyright 2014 Armstrong & Associates, Inc. 5 | P a g e
Pipelines
are
the
most
inexpensive
and
environmentally
friendly
methods
of
transportation.
The
U.S.
and
Canada
have
the
largest
amounts.
Some
small
countries/regions
like
Singapore,
Hong
Kong
and
the
Netherlands
have
high
‐
quality
infrastructure
for
all
transportation
modes.
They
are
also
key
crossroad
locations
for
global
trade,
transportation
and
storage.
In
addition
to
physical
infrastructure
limitations,
most
emerging
market/developing
economy
countries
have
various
forms
of
information
controls
which
seriously
disrupt
freight
flows
and
the
ability
to
do
business.
Most
of
the
disruptions
increase
cost
and
lower
efficiencies
within
their
host
countries.
Here
are
some
examples:
Brazil
In
Brazil,
the
governmental
challenges
to
managing
transportation
are
substantial.
A
third
‐
party
logistics
provider
(3PL)
can
manage
carriers,
handle
proof
of
delivery
(POD)
management
and
settlement,
plan
routings,
handle
rates
and
develop
solutions.
Sounds
like
routine
transportation
management
except
for
the
consequences
of
governmental
activity.
First
among
these
is
the
impact
of
Agência
Nacional
de
Vigilância
Sanitária
(ANVISA)
or
The
National
Health
Surveillance
Agency.
In
addition
to
controlling
production
and
marking
of
drugs,
devices
and
services,
the
agency
has
authority
over
transportation
infrastructure
used
for
the
movement
of
drugs,
devices,
etc.
As
a
result,
the
carriers,
trucks
and
warehouses
used
by
a
3PL
have
to
be
approved
by
ANVISA.
To
comply,
a
3PL
can
keep
track
of
truck
licensing,
inspection
and
insurance
and
has
ultimate
responsibility
for
compliance.
In
addition
to
the
ANVISA
requirements,
states
require
individual
facility
licenses
under
the
Visa
program.
Much
more
problematic
for
transportation
management,
however,
is
the
value
‐
added
tax,
ICMS.
ICMS
is
the
tax
on
the
circulation
of
goods,
interstate
and
intercity
transportation,
and
communication
services,
even
when
the
operation
is
initiated
abroad.
The
ICMS
rates
vary
on
average
from
7
‐
19%
by
state
in
Brazil.
Certain
states
create
initiatives
for
particular
industries
by
reducing
ICMS
rates
on
products.
For
example,
Goias
has
a
special
incentive
for
manufacturing
drugs
and
devices.
In
Manaus,
in
the
Amazon
region,
there
is
a
free
trade
zone
filled
with
brand
name
manufacturers
of
electronic
gear
and
motorcycles/scooters.
The
tax
free
merchandise
is
shipped
down
the
river
in
road
containers
on
barges
(about
700
miles
over
three
to
four
days).
Payloads,
especially
for
healthcare
products,
are
often
limited
by
insurance
limits
on
the
value
of
© Copyright 2014 Armstrong & Associates, Inc. 6 | P a g e
The
value
of
goods
and
tax
requirements
are
important
considerations
for
managing
transportation.
The
main
freight
bill
document,
the
CTRC,
includes
extensive
information
on
the
value
of
merchandise,
financial
negotiation,
the
tax
on
freight
charges
and,
yes,
information
on
the
shipper,
consignee,
weight,
pieces,
etc.
The
transportation
manager
juggles
it
all
to
find
the
best
solution.
Along
the
way
he
must
get
government
approval
for
the
shipment
and
two
PODs
‐
one
on
the
CTRC
and
one
for
the
accompanying
invoice.
India
1
The
major
challenges
in
India
include
lack
of
highways
between
and
within
cities,
over
capacity
ports
and
India's
famously
cumbersome
and
large
governmental
bureaucracy.
Traditional
corruption
complicates
business
and
everyday
life.
However,
GDP
growth
will
be
respectable
again
this
year
and
India's
establishment
is
changing.
During
our
visit,
Anna
Hazare
was
leading
an
effort
to
force
governmental
reform
of
corruption.
Hazare
was
on
an
extended
Gandhi
style
fest.
In
India,
most
large
retailers
have
many
(20
‐
24)
smaller
distribution
centers
to
avoid
heavy
goods
services
taxes
incurred
in
moving
product
across
states
lines.
There
are
30
states.
Currently,
there
is
a
movement
to
make
the
goods
and
services
tax
(GST)
uniform
across
the
states
which
would
allow
most
companies
to
reduce
their
number
of
distribution
centers.
In
addition,
major
highways
are
being
built
for
the
"golden
quadrangle"
that
will
connect
the
major
cities
and
regions.
The
major
areas
are
the
North
Central
based
on
New
Delhi
(population
22
million),
the
Western
region
with
Mumbai
(population
20
million),
the
nation's
economic
center
and
major
port
as
its
hub,
the
Northeast
around
Kolkata
(population
15
million)
and
the
South
including
the
key
city
of
Bangalore
(population
7
million)
and
the
second
largest
port
of
Chennai
(population
7
million).
Traditionally,
Colombo
at
the
north
tip
of
Sri
Lanka
has
been
a
key
port
of
call
for
major
shipping
lines.
Much
of
the
Indian
East
Coast
container
movement
is
reloaded
to
larger
vessels
there.
In
addition,
Kolkata
is
a
shallow
water
port
and
Chennai
is
over
capacity.
A
fourth
port
is
being
built
in
Mumbai
to
handle
its
current
over
capacity
situation.
Most
inland
linehaul
between
major
ports
and
markets
is
performed
by
container
or
trailer
on
flat
car
(COFC/TOFC).
For
truckers,
operations
are
complicated
nearly
everywhere
by
lack
and
quality
of
the
road
network.
Restrictions,
such
as
the
limitation
on
truck
traffic
in
Mumbai
between
6
a.m.
and
6
p.m.
make
for
additional
operating
challenges.
1 Based on 2011 visit.
© Copyright 2014 Armstrong & Associates, Inc. 7 | P a g e
China
China's
provinces
exercise
extensive
authority
over
border
crossings.
Disruptions
are
normally
based
on
licenses
to
operate.
Having
the
right
national
and
local
governmental
licenses
is
imperative.
While
you
can
have
national
authority
to
operate
in
China
for
warehousing
and
road
transportation,
you
must
have
local
licenses
to
bill
and
collect
for
services.
DHL
Supply
Chain
is
a
wholly
‐
owned,
national
operation
with
local
business
licenses
in
19
major
cities.
Specific
hygiene
licenses
for
food
warehousing,
co
‐
packing
and
transport
are
held
in
Shanghai,
Beijing
and
Guangzhou.
Regional
road
transportation
licenses
are
held
for
Beijing,
Tianjin,
Shanghai,
Hefei
and
Suzhou.
Obtaining
the
necessary
licenses
in
China
is
doable,
but
requires
working
through
tedious,
bureaucratic
challenges.
Often
you
need
to
obtain
a
local
business
license
and
then
a
second
local
license
for
transport
or
special
warehousing
operations.
Once
issued,
licenses
are
not
transferrable.
Infrastructure
challenges
create
opportunities
for
modern,
sophisticated
3PLs.
Most
major,
international
companies
find
it
expedient
to
let
DB
Schenker
Logistics,
UPS
Supply
Chain
Solutions
or
a
similar
3PL
address
the
problems
and
offer
uniform
solutions
around
the
globe.
© Copyright 2014 Armstrong & Associates, Inc. 8 | P a g e
Global Logistics Costs and Third‐Party Logistics Revenues
Armstrong
and
Associates,
Inc.
(A&A)
has
developed
logistics
cost
and
third
‐
party
logistics
revenue
estimates
for
the
period,
2010
‐
2014.
The
tables
include
the
major
regions
of
North
America,
Europe,
Asia
Pacific
and
South
America
as
well
as
breakdowns
for
28
countries.
The
complete
tables
are
in
Appendix
A.
Global
logistics
costs
have
increased
from
$6.1
trillion
in
2006
to
$8.4
trillion
in
2012.
We
have
projected
global
logistics
costs
and
third
‐
party
logistics
revenues
through
fiscal
year
2015.
Figure 1. Global Logistics Costs and Third‐Party Logistics Revenues (US$ Billions)
Globally,
modern
industrially
developed
and
post
industrial
countries
have
the
lowest
relative
logistics
costs
as
a
percent
of
GDP.
For
example,
for
2012,
North
America's
logistics
cost
as
a
percent
of
GDP
was
8.8%
and
Europe's
was
9.2%.
Asia
Pacific's
estimate
was
12.8%
and
South
America's
was
12.3%.
This
is
a
function
of
logistics
(road/rail/port)
infrastructure,
the
lifecycle
deployment
of
leading
logistics
practices,
and
influence
of
ongoing
process
improvements
including
eliminating
unnecessary
governmental,
bureaucratic
obstacles.
$‐ $1,000 $2,000 $3,000 $4,000 $5,000 $6,000 $7,000 $8,000 $9,000 $10,000 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013E 2014E 2015E Year
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013E 2014E 2015E 3PL Revenue $471 $489 $507 $507 $631 $662 $685 $704 $727 $753
© Copyright 2014 Armstrong & Associates, Inc. 9 | P a g e
Figure 2. 2012 Logistics Costs by Region and Key Countries (US$ Billions)
For
a
single
country,
China’s
logistics
cost
is
the
highest
in
the
world
at
$1.5
trillion
per
year
(in
comparison,
U.S.
logistics
cost
is
$1.3
trillion)
and
equivalent
to
more
than
half
the
Asia
Pacific
region.
Globally,
the
Asia
Pacific
(APAC)
is
the
largest
logistics
market
accounting
for
34%
of
total
global
logistics
costs
and
35%
of
total
global
3PL
revenues.
Figure 3. 2012 Logistics Cost by Region (as a % of GDP)
$1,640 $1,546 $1,505 $1,335 $757 $509 $507 $‐ $200 $400 $600 $800 $1,000 $1,200 $1,400 $1,600 $1,800
North America Greater China Europe United States Asia Pacific (ex. Greater China
and Japan)
South America Japan
17.2% 12.3% 10.9% 9.2% 8.8% 8.5% 0% 2% 4% 6% 8% 10% 12% 14% 16% 18% 20%
Greater China South America Asia Pacific
(ex. Greater China
and Japan)
© Copyright 2014 Armstrong & Associates, Inc. 10 | P a g e
In
terms
of
logistics
cost
as
a
percent
of
GDP,
developing
economies
normally
run
11
‐
15%,
while
Greater
China
is
at
17%.
The
distribution
of
logistics
cost
percentages
is
similar
to
that
for
logistics
performance
index
(LPI)
numbers
developed
by
The
World
Bank.
Figure 4. Distribution of Logistics (GDP %), 3PL Revenue % and LPI numbers
Figure 5. Logistics Cost Growth (CAGR by Region)
0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 4.5 0.0% 2.0% 4.0% 6.0% 8.0% 10.0% 12.0% 14.0% 16.0% 18.0% 20.0% Me xi co C ana da Un it e d Sta te s It al y Sp ai n Fr an ce Un it e d K ing do m N e th e rl ands Ger m an y In d ia Ch in a Sou th Ko re a Ta iw an A u st ra lia Ja p an Ho n g Ko n g Si n ga p or e Ve n e zu el a C o lo m b ia Pe ru Ar ge n ti n a Bra zi l C h ile North America
Europe Asia Pacific South America
Lo gis tics Pe rf o rm an ce In d e x (L P I)
Logistics (GDP %) 3PL Revenue % LPI
10.8% 6.7% 5.9% 4.6% 3.5% 2.1% 8.2% 5.8% 3.4% 1.6% 2.1% 0.6% 0.0% 2.0% 4.0% 6.0% 8.0% 10.0% 12.0%
Greater China Asia Pacific
(ex. Greater China
and Japan)
South America Japan North America Europe
© Copyright 2014 Armstrong & Associates, Inc. 11 | P a g e
Greater
China
and
Asia
Pacific
(excluding
Japan)
are
expected
to
be
the
fastest
growing
regions
in
terms
of
logistics
cost
during
the
period
from
2012
to
2015.
This
will
primarily
be
driven
by
strong
growth
in
private
domestic
consumption
on
general
merchandise,
including
a
range
of
fast
‐
moving
consumer
goods
for
daily
consumption,
as
well
as
luxury
items.
This
growth
reflects
a
number
of
factors
including
strong
economic
growth,
encouraging
demographics,
sustained
urbanization
and
growth
of
the
middle
class.
Figure 6. GDP Growth (CAGR by Region)
10.6% 6.4% 5.9% 4.6% 2.4% 2.1% 8.0% 5.5% 3.4% 1.6% 2.1% 0.6% 0.0% 2.0% 4.0% 6.0% 8.0% 10.0% 12.0%
Greater China Asia Pacific
(ex. Greater China
and Japan)
South America Japan North America Europe
© Copyright 2014 Armstrong & Associates, Inc. 12 | P a g e
Third‐Party Logistics Market
Logistics
involves
the
movement
and
storage
of
goods
between
different
locations
from
origin
suppliers
to
intermediate
points,
and
eventually
to
end
users.
In
the
logistics
industry,
logistics
service
providers
generally
focus
on
two
primary
service
functions:
1.)
transportation
by
different
modes
(ground,
ocean,
air,
rail)
and
2.)
warehousing
(storage,
consolidation/deconsolidation,
cross
docking).
The
breadth
of
value
‐
added
services
and
capabilities
a
logistics
provider
can
offer
customers
differentiates
3PLs
from
transactional
transportation
companies
and
basic
warehousing
operations.
The
table
below
includes
some
of
the
primary
3PL
value
‐
added
services
and
capabilities.
The
major
change
since
1995
has
been
an
increase
in
the
complexity
and
clustering
of
these
services.
Several
of
the
largest
3PLs
(DHL
Supply
Chain
&
Global
Forwarding,
DB
Schenker
Logistics,
Kuehne
+
Nagel,
Nippon
Express
and
UPS
Supply
Chain
Solutions)
offer
a
wide
array
of
these
services
to
their
largest
customers.
Table 2. Third‐Party Logistics Value‐Added Services
Both – 3PL/4PL
4PL/Lead Logistics Provider
Call Centers Consolidation/Deconsolidation Consulting/Process Reengineering EDI Handling Exception Handling Financial Services
Food Grade/Temperature Controlled
Hazmat Skills
ISO Certification
Inventory/Vendor Management
Lean Management Skills
Order Management
Pool Distribution/Cross Docking
Radio Frequency/RFID
Security Processes
Sourcing/Procurement Skills
Supply Chain Systems
Domestic & International Trans. Mgmt.
Cargo Insurance
Carrier Contracting/Brokering/Freight Payment
Customs Brokerage
Duty Drawback Processing
Freight Forwarding/NVOCC
lncoterms Management – EXW to DDP
Letters of Credit/Negotiable BOLs
Merge In Transit
Multimodal Transportation
Project Logistics
Transportation Execution
Transportation Network Planning/Optimization
Value‐Added Warehousing & Distribution
Bonded Facilities
Easily Deployable IT & Work Processes
Installation/Removal
JIT/Kanban
Kitting/Pick & Pack
Light Manufacturing/Assembly Order Fulfillment Reverse Logistics Subassembly
© Copyright 2014 Armstrong & Associates, Inc. 13 | P a g e
The
key
competitive
differentiators
between
3PLs
include
supply
chain
management
systems
capabilities,
operations
management
skills,
and
logistics
engineering
expertise.
Most
tier
‐
one
3PLs
have
implemented
integrated
systems
platforms
to
support
global
transportation
and
warehouse
management
operations.
These
platforms
offer
internet
visibility
and
exception
handling
capabilities
combined
with
transportation
management
functionality
for
the
daily
management
of
orders,
customer
inventory,
and
the
optimization
of
thousands
of
shipments
across
large
geographical
areas.
The
same
3PLs
can
run
value
‐
added
warehousing
operations,
perform
supply
chain
network
analysis
and
design,
and
manage
call
center
and
fulfillment
operations.
Several
3PLs
have
expanded
to
have
global
scope
for
all
services.
Most
often,
global
3PL
expansions
have
been
through
acquisitions.
The
following
table
provides
a
list
of
major
deals.
Table 3. Select 3PL Acquisitions (US$ Millions)
Target Company Acquirer Acquisition Date Purchase Price Target Company Yearly Revenue Target Company EBIT or EBITDA EBIT* or EBITDA** Multiplier American Backhaulers C.H. Robinson Worldwide 12/1999 100 cash/36 stock 280 13 10.5* Tibbett & Britten Exel 12/2004 598 2,600 87.9 6.8** Ozburn‐Hessey Logistics Welsch, Carson, Anderson & Stone 6/27/2005 396 302 43 9.2** BAX Global Deutsche Bahn 1/31/2006 1,210 2,734 113 10.7* Barthco International Ozburn‐Hessey Logistics 7/7/2006 90 120 10 9* Jacobson Companies Oak Hill Capital 6/1/2007 500 375 45 11** EGL Apollo Management/CEVA 7/2007 2,200 3,200 152 14.5** Geodis SNCF 7/1/2008 1,735 7,043 181 9.6* Express Logistics Group Toll Holdings 10/23/2009 45 113 5.6 8* Summit Logistics International Toll Holdings 2/2/2010 70.3 261 7.6 9.3** ATC Technology Corporation GENCO Distribution System 7/2010 512.6 476 77.7 6.6** Total Logistic Control Ryder 12/31/2010 200 250 36 7** TDG Norbert Dentressangle 3/2011 320 1,100 55 5.8** Exel Transportation Services/Mode Transportation Hub Group 4/4/2011 83 717 4 20.8* Caterpillar Logistics Services Platinum Equity 5/11/2012 700 660 60 11* Turbo Logistics XPO Logistics 10/24/2012 50 124 6.2 8* Phoenix International C.H. Robinson Worldwide 11/1/2012 635 807 50.8 12.5**Source: Primary, Company Information; Secondary, Armstrong & Associates, Inc. Estimates
© Copyright 2014 Armstrong & Associates, Inc. 14 | P a g e
International
transportation
management
(freight
forwarding
and
non
‐
vessel
operating
common
carrier
(NVOCC))
and
value
‐
added
warehousing
and
distribution
are
the
key
components
of
global
third
‐
party
logistics.
International
transportation
management
(ITM)
3PLs
have
a
core
competency
in
freight
forwarding
and
often
offer
a
host
of
additional
value
‐
added
services.
They
traditionally
act
as
intermediaries
arranging
for
international
and
related
domestic
transportation
between
their
customers
and
transportation
providers.
ITM
3PLs
arrange
and
oversee
all
aspects
of
the
transportation
of
products
and
materials,
from
origin
to
destination,
by
ground,
ocean,
air
and
rail.
An
ITM
3PL
will
typically
arrange
to
pick
up
goods
from
a
shipper,
consolidate
shipments,
procure
transportation,
and
provide
ancillary
value
‐
added
services
including
preparation
and
submission
of
documentation,
customs
and
other
clearance
processes,
and
warehousing
and
auditing
of
shipments.
In
addition,
they
will
have
systems
for
tracking
and
tracing
shipments
and
automating
processes
with
customs
officials.
Typically,
ITM
operations
are
non
‐
asset.
Value
‐
added
warehousing
and
distribution
(VAWD)
3PLs
manage
customers
warehousing
and
related
transportation
management
needs.
These
services
are
typically
performed
under
multi
‐
year
contracts
in
which
the
3PLs
systems
and
staff
take
over
responsibility
of
critical
logistics
functions.
Responsibilities
often
include
managing
and
optimizing
warehousing
operations,
transport
routes
and
providers–whether
inbound,
outbound
or
dealing
with
aftermarket
returns–kitting
and
sequencing
unassembled
parts,
providing
support
during
manufacturing,
picking
and
packing
finished
goods,
and
providing
quality
control
and
other
value
‐
added
services.
Europeans
tend
to
lump
VAWD
and
the
related
outbound
transportation
into
“contract
logistics.”
Traditionally,
this
3PL
segment
is
asset
‐
based.
© Copyright 2014 Armstrong & Associates, Inc. 15 | P a g e
Figure 7. Key Drivers of 3PL Market Growth
Traditionally
companies
outsourced
functions
to
3PLs
in
order
to
reduce
costs,
gain
operational
efficiencies,
and
focus
on
core
competencies
in
manufacturing.
Starting
in
the
early
1990s,
there
was
a
significant
increase
in
offshoring
of
manufacturing
operations
and
a
shift
from
domestic
supply
chains
with
domestic
logistics
management
needs
to
global
supply
chains
with
international
logistics
needs.
Doing
business
globally
is
more
complex
and
requires
increased
regional
and
local
market
expertise
in
managing
transportation
and
warehousing,
and
adhering
to
governmental
regulations.
These
increases
in
supply
chain
complexity
have
driven
many
companies
to
engage
the
help
of
3PLs
as
logistics
and
regulatory
specialists.
In
turn,
3PLs
with
expertise
in
international
transportation
management
and
warehousing
and
distribution
are
providing
economies
with
the
operational
“backbone”
for
global
trade.
Off‐Shoring &
Outsourced Mfg. Regulatory Compliance Focus on Core Competencies Expanding IT Requirements
Need Regional & Local
Market Expertise
Low‐Cost Country
Sourcing Cost Reductions Regulatory Compliance Increasing Supply Chain Complexity
© Copyright 2014 Armstrong & Associates, Inc. 16 | P a g e
3PL Revenue and Growth Rates Analysis
Figure 8. 2012 3PL Revenue by Region (US$ Billions)
Europe
continues
to
fluctuate
in
and
out
of
recession
with
ongoing
economic
austerity
which
is
negatively
impacting
its
output.
Based
upon
its
2012
regional
revenue,
we
estimate
that
3PLs
operating
in
the
Europe
region
have
penetrated
23%
of
the
total
potential
market,
so
the
trend
to
outsource
logistics
functions
to
3PLs
continues
to
provide
for
growth
over
and
above
the
overall
economy.
The
best
European
‐
based
3PLs
have
made
acquisitions
to
globalize
their
operations
and
participate
in
developing
markets
with
higher
rates
of
growth.
North
America
is
benefiting
from
an
improving
U.S.
economy
with
increasing
manufacturing
levels,
the
nearshoring
of
some
manufacturing
to
Mexico,
and
newly
addressable
oil
and
gas
operations
in
Canada
and
the
U.S.
Consumers
in
the
U.S.
bounced
back
from
the
great
recession
of
2009
and
started
to
spend
more
especially
on
large
ticket
items.
All
of
these
factors
are
driving
an
improved
3PL
market.
$171 $126 $158 $64 $44 $53 $‐ $20 $40 $60 $80 $100 $120 $140 $160 $180 $200
North America Greater China Europe Asia Pacific
(ex. Greater China
and Japan)
© Copyright 2014 Armstrong & Associates, Inc. 17 | P a g e
Figure 9. 3PL Revenue Growth (CAGR by Region)
The
geographic
region
with
the
highest
3PL
revenue
spend
and
the
highest
3PL
growth
rates
is
APAC,
where
growth
has
traditionally
been
driven
by
companies
outsourcing
or
offshoring
manufacturing
to
lower
cost
countries.
While
this
trend
still
continues
in
Myanmar,
Malaysia,
Indonesia,
Vietnam,
Cambodia,
and
to
a
lesser
extent
in
China,
Thailand,
the
Philippines,
and
Singapore,
increasing
domestic
consumption
and
demand
for
products
are
driving
the
need
for
modern
distribution
networks
in
the
Asia
Pacific
region.
The
emphasis
is
shifting
away
from
export
trade
and
ocean
or
air
freight
forwarding
to
intra
‐
regional
ground
distribution.
3PLs
providing
value
‐
added
warehousing
and
distribution
services
in
these
countries
are
experiencing
significant
growth.
10.8% 6.2% 6.0% 5.2% 4.6% 2.1% 8.1% 5.4% 3.4% 5.8% 1.6% 0.6% 0.0% 2.0% 4.0% 6.0% 8.0% 10.0% 12.0%
Greater China Asia Pacific
(ex. Greater China
and Japan)
South America North America Japan Europe
© Copyright 2014 Armstrong & Associates, Inc. 18 | P a g e
Figure 10. 2012 Asia Pacific 3PL Revenue Breakdown (%)
The
graph
above
shows
the
3PL
revenue
by
Asia
Pacific
countries
in
2012.
As
demonstrated,
China
accounts
for
48.8%
of
all
Asia
Pacific
3PL
revenues.
Our
estimate
of
3PL
penetration
of
the
total
potential
U.S.
3PL
market
is
21%,
up
from
10%
in
2002.
This
compares
to
current
3PL
market
penetration
rates
of
23%
in
Europe
and
only
17%
in
China.
As
a
result,
the
underlying
structural
market
dynamics
are
good
and
will
support
the
trend
for
continued
outsourcing
to
3PLs
in
Asia.
In
combination
with
its
above
‐
average
economic
growth,
we
anticipate
Asia
to
continue
to
realize
above
‐
average
growth
rates
for
third
‐
party
logistics.
China, 48.8% Japan, 21.9% India, 6.8% Australia, 6.8% South Korea, 4.7% Indonesia, 2.8% Taiwan, 1.9% Thailand, 1.2% Singapore, 1.1% Hong Kong, 1.0% Malaysia, 0.9% Philippines, 0.8% Others, 0.7% Vietnam, 0.5%
© Copyright 2014 Armstrong & Associates, Inc. 19 | P a g e
Major Region 3PL Market Growth Trends
Figure 11. 3PL Revenues by Major Geographic Region (