The Industry Skills Council for
Government and Community Safety
Operators within Drinking Water
Treatment Systems
PROPOSED
NATIONAL CERTIFICATION
This work has been undertaken by Government Skills Australia on behalf of the National Water Commission.
2
Proposed National Certification Framework 2012Contents
Introduction ... 3
Structure ... 8
Part One –Scope of Certification ... 11
Part Two –System Complexity Rating ... 13
Part Three – Operators in Scope ... 15
Part Four - Competency Requirement ... 17
Part Five – Attaining Certification ... 21
Part Six – Maintaining Certification ... 23
Rationale ... 23
Summary of Competency, Capability and PD Requirements ... 26
Part Seven – Certification Status ... 27
Part Eight – Certification Management ... 29
Appendix A – Approved Professional Development ... 31
Appendix B – Water Treatment Units of Competency ... 33
3
Proposed National Certification Framework 2012Introduction
The Proposed National Certification Framework 2012: Operators within Drinking Water Treatment Systems (the Certification Framework) is underpinned by the need to ensure consumers are provided with safe drinking water.
It provides an assurance to regulators, communities and consumers that operators are competent to manage drinking water quality, as well as being capable of identifying and responding to water quality risks and incidents. The framework introduces a minimum level of competency for Certified Operators across all states and territories by aligning skills, knowledge and competency requirements to national
Vocational Education and Training (VET) standards. Further, the Certification Framework ensures there is a requirement for on-going maintenance/development of skills and knowledge.
Extensive research and consultation has informed the development of this framework including national, international and industry-wide strategies involving workshops in each state and territory. These workshops were attended by public health and water quality regulators, private and public sector water enterprises, peak industry bodies, as well as a range of associated industries.
Purpose
The Certification Framework provides a set of nationally consistent criteria that defines and recognises the minimum level of competency and capability required of operators who treat and/or sample drinking water for human consumption to ensure that it is safe.
Scope
The Certification Framework is intended for use by all Australian owners and/or operators of systems that provide drinking water for human consumption. Variables considered in the certification framework design include:
• Industry structures (major urban utilities, corporations, local government authorities, public and private entities, small, regional and remote, wholesale, retail and contractors);
• Employment structures (from full time treatment operators to part-time/multi-disciplined workers);
• Differing and changing legislative conditions across states and territories; and
• Local risks to drinking water quality (physical, microbial, chemical and radiological). The actions of operators that
treat drinking water have a direct impact on water quality and consequently may impact on the public health risk to communities and consumers.
4
Proposed National Certification Framework 2012 The Certification Framework applies only to the operators of treatment processes; or where no treatment process exists, to those that monitor, sample and/or test drinking water in compliance with public health/water quality regulatory requirements. It does not apply to professionals or para-professionals (such as engineers or chemists), non-operational supervisors, administrative workers, managers or senior executives.It is not intended for use by the bottled water industry or where water of a higher quality is required for
applications in medical or industrial industries. Similarly, it is not applicable to private residences where water is sourced and/or treated onsite for domestic consumption.
The competency and capability of operators is just one component that ultimately ensures that drinking water is safe. Other issues that affect the safety of drinking water include:
• The condition and management of a raw water source
• Investment in infrastructure such as treatment facilities, secondary points of disinfection and the reticulation network.
• The actions of other workers in the water sector.
This framework is not intended to drive investment in infrastructure (e.g. treatment facilities or distribution networks) or the planning and construction of raw water sources, but to recognise the important role that competent and capable operators play in the provision of safe drinking water.
The Australian Drinking Water Guidelines
The Australian Drinking Water Guidelines (ADWG) provides an interrelated set of standards to assure safe drinking water through a preventive risk management approach. It is designed as ‘a robust system [that] must include mechanisms or fail-safes to accommodate inevitable human errors without allowing major failures to occur’. Further, the ADWG recognises that safe drinking water will only be assured by managing all risks from ‘catchment to tap’. (Australian Government, 2011)
Please refer to the National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) website for the latest version of the Australian Drinking Water Guidelines.
An operator will perform any or all of the following: • Control • Optimise • Sample • Monitor • Report
5
Proposed National Certification Framework 2012The Certification Framework does not seek to replicate any component of the ADWG. Instead, it draws key aspects from it to assist Drinking Water Suppliers to define the competency and capability requirements of operators. Figure 1 below provides advice as to the alignment of this certification framework and the ADWG.
Regulatory Conditions
Any statement or condition made in this framework does not over-ride the local regulatory requirements placed upon a Drinking Water Supplier.
Applying the Certification Framework
The criteria identified in this Certification Framework are a minimum only. The criteria provides for specific competency and capability requirements that align directly to the tasks performed. Drinking Water Suppliers are strongly encouraged to exceed the minimum standards identified in the Certification Framework wherever possible.
Mandatory Application
Jurisdictional regulatory arrangements will require regulated Drinking Water Suppliers to participate in this framework as a component of any obligation to manage risk to public health.
Figure 1- Alignment of the Certification Framework to the ADWG 12 Elements of the Australian Drinking Water Guidelines
Element Title Certification Linkage
1 Commitment to drinking water quality management Parts 2, 4, 5 & 6 2 Assessment of the drinking water supply system Part 2
3 Preventive measures for drinking water quality management Parts 4, 5 & 6 4 Operational procedures and process control Parts 2 & 4 5 Verification of drinking water quality Part 4 6 Management of Incidents and emergencies Part 5
7 Employee awareness and training Parts 4, 5, 6 & 8 8 Community involvement and awareness
9 Research and development Part 6
10 Documentation and reporting Part 8 11 Evaluation and audit
6
Proposed National Certification Framework 2012Features of the Framework
Certification is based on the requirement of a drinking water treatment operator to:
• Achieve the necessary competencies specified in the National Water Training Package (NWP07 and future revised versions) for operating, controlling or optimising water treatment processes and/or monitoring, sampling and reporting water quality;
• Demonstrate capability within the workplace through industry experience; and • Continue to develop knowledge and skills, as well as maintain currency of industry
experience.
The complexity of each Drinking Water Treatment System forms the basis for determining the competency and capability required of the certified operator. The complexity of each Drinking Water Treatment System will be measured through an approved process endorsed by the relevant state and territory regulator. This allows for regulators to use established reporting in alignment with the ADWG risk management guidelines (such as Drinking Water Quality Risk Management Plans) and the flexibility to negotiate with Drinking Water Suppliers on a needs basis.
National Competency Standards
By adopting national competency standards under the Vocational Education and Training (VET) framework the skills and knowledge of a Certified Operator will be portable. This also provides rigorous training and assessment through the regulation and auditing of Registered Training Organisations (RTOs).
Qualifications or Statements of Attainment will identify competencies issued through an RTO and are recognised as achievement of competency in the Certification Framework. Drinking Water Suppliers will notice that competency standards change over time. Where there are any concerns about the currency of a Certified Operator’s competency, the Drinking Water Supplier is advised to liaise directly with the Certifying Body or their preferred RTO.
Management and Maintenance of the Framework
The Framework is designed to be managed and maintained by an independent third party entity in accordance with the direction set from consultation with industry stakeholders, including regulators. The Certification Body will be responsible for the development of software and supporting systems to record and report details as listed in Part Nine – Management of the Framework.
Note: Due to the potential conflict of interest that may arise, RTOs or affiliates*, Drinking Water Suppliers and state/territory regulators are precluded from taking on the role as a certifying body.
*An RTO affiliate is an organisation that has entered into a partnership arrangement to delivery nationally recognised training or is a member of an RTO Board of Governance.
7
Proposed National Certification Framework 2012Review and Continuous Improvement
The water industry is being subjected to increasing levels of change as a result of: • Changing local legislative requirements,
• Reform in the sector nationally and at local levels; and • Increasing development and adoption of new technologies.
• Changing workforce demographics, creating the need to manage attraction, retention and knowledge management issues.
The owner of this Certification Framework will initiate and facilitate periodic review of the Framework to ensure competency, capability and development standards defined in this document remain valid and appropriate to the industry and align to the elements of the ADWG.
8
Proposed National Certification Framework 2012Structure
The Certification Framework fits into the highly complex, multi-faceted water industry. In isolation, it provides minimum standards that Certified Operators will need to attain to ensure they can competently carry out drinking water treatment tasks.
In a larger context, the framework forms just one driver in an industry underpinned by a commitment to training, research, innovation and regulation. Table 1 below depicts the complex layers of state/territory and commonwealth water quality management:
Commonwealth State/Territory Local Industry
Policy • National Water Commission • National Health and Medical Research Council • Standing Council on Environment and Water (SCEW) Guidelines/Standards • Australian Drinking Water Guidelines (ADWG) • National Water Industry Training Package NWP07 Regulatory • Water Licensing (extraction) • Approvals • Public Health • Drinking Water Quality Management • Best Practice Guidelines • Fluoridation • OH&S • Environmental • Reporting • Office of Water (or equivalent) • Economic Regulator Regulatory • Local approvals • Inspections Guidelines/Standards • Customer contracts • Defined levels of service • Local Standards Guidelines/Standards • Best Practice Guidelines • AS/NZS quality standards Peak Bodies/ Associations • Water Services Association of Australian (WSAA) • Australian Water Association (AWA) • Government Skills Australia (GSA) • Industry Training Advisory Bodies (ITABs) • NSW Water Directorate • QLD Water Directorate • VicWater • Water Industry Operators Association of Australia (WIOA) • National Centre of Excellence in Desalination Employee Associations • ASU Table 1 - Drivers and Guidance for Water Quality Management in Australia
9
Proposed National Certification Framework 2012Functionally, this framework applies to one component of the total water sector, as represented in Figure 1 below:
Figure 2 - Components of the Water Sector
The Certification Framework may be expanded to other sectors within the Water Industry upon successful implementation of this framework within the drinking water treatment sector.
Certification Process
Figure 3 following provides an overview of the processes that underpins this framework:
•Reservoirs, rivers, dams, aquifers, oceans •Hydrography Catchment •Disinfection & treatment •Conditioning & aesthetics •Upstream & Downstream chemical dosing Water Treatment •Distribution of drinking water •Collection of waste water Reticulation •Treatment •Re-use •Dewatering •Tradewaste Wastewater Treatment •Discharge •Oceans •Land •Rivers/ Streams Environment
10
Proposed National Certification Framework 2012 Yes No Yes Yes No No Yes INITIAL CERTIFICATION RE-CERTIFICATION Conduct System Complexity Risk RatingOperator has attained competenci Certification Status: Active Breaches in performance Moved from Operational Role in excess of 2 years Certification Status: Revoked PD or audit requirem ent met? Extension Granted for 3 months Certification Status: Inactive Minimum Timeframe met + Sign-Off Training Program ID fit for purpose units
of competency
Previously Extended After 3 years
Figure 3 - Process for Certification and Re-Certification
No
11
Proposed National Certification Framework 2012Part One – Scope of Certification
Part One identifies the physical system components and stakeholders that are the focus of this Framework. It identifies the organisations that will likely employ water treatment operators to perform tasks associated with creating and maintaining safe drinking water.
Rationale
The Certification Framework provides one preventive measure as described in the ADWG that, when integrated with sound management of the entire system, will provide for safe drinking water.
Definitions
Drinking Water Treatment System –
Are a component of the Drinking Water Supply System as defined at Element 3.2 of the ADWG. Drinking Water Treatment Systems provide water intended for human consumption that;
• Does not pass through any treatment barriers; or
• Is treated by a single barrier or multiple barrier drinking water treatment facility.
Where a water treatment facility exists, the Drinking Water Treatment System is inclusive of downstream chemical dosing and disinfection.
It does not include direct or indirect drinking water recycling/re-use schemes.
Drinking Water Supplier
An organisation/enterprise (public or private) or, individual that provides drinking water for human consumption. The Drinking Water Supplier includes, but is not limited to: • major urban utility,
• corporation
• local government authority, • public or private entity, • small, regional or remote, • wholesaler, retailer or contractor
Any organisation contracted to manage a Drinking Water Treatment System (or part thereof) is considered to be a Drinking Water Supplier.
Note that ‘Independent Contractors’ (individuals) are defined in Part Three – Operators in Scope Drinking Water Treatment Systems Distribution and Collection Wastewater Management Raw Water / Water Re -use
12
Proposed National Certification Framework 2012Treatment Process
Any process within a Drinking Water Treatment System that changes the physical, chemical or biological properties of water derived from any source in order to make it safe for human consumption or to make it comply with a regulatory order relating to human consumption. Treatment processes include, but are not limited to:
• Primary and Secondary Disinfection • Coagulation and Flocculation • Sedimentation and Clarification • Dissolved Air Flotation
• Granular Filtration • Membrane Filtration • Reverse Osmosis • Adsorption • Ion Exchange • Fluoridation • Softening/Hardening • Chemical Dosing
13
Proposed National Certification Framework 2012Part Two – System Complexity Rating
Part Two outlines the requirement for the Drinking Water Supplier to rate every Drinking Water Treatment System in relation to its complexity.
Rationale
The competencies and capabilities required of operators will be defined at different levels dependent upon the complexity of the system.
The System Complexity Rating supports the Certification Framework by categorising systems into the following:
• Low Complexity: Will typically include drinking water systems where no treatment barriers are in place or where disinfection is the only treatment barrier. Fluoridation of water may occur at this level.
Skills required by Certified Operators will typically be sourced at AQF level 2 and involve chemical dosing, sampling and/or reporting.
• Medium Complexity: Will typically include all conventional treatment systems involving small to medium sized treatment facilities where no extraordinary conditions apply (such as high variability in source water quality). Fluoridation may also occur. Skills required by Certified Operators will typically be sourced at AQF levels 2 and 3 and involve chemical dosing, control of conventional treatment processes, monitoring, sampling and/or reporting.
• High Complexity: Will typically include drinking water systems that have a number of conventional and/or advanced treatment barriers in place requiring frequent and/or specialised intervention by the Certified Operator. Fluoridation may also occur.
Skills required by Certified Operators will typically be sourced from AQF levels 2, 3 and 4 and involve monitoring, sampling, reporting, chemical dosing and control/optimisation of multiple conventional and/or advanced treatment processes. Factors that will impact upon the competency and capability requirement of the Certified Operator include, but are not limited to:
• Automation and level of intervention • Technology
• Complexity of individual processes • Interrelatedness of processes • Size of the facility
• Number of connections • Volume of Flow
• Timeliness of response requirements • Raw source water management • Raw water quality and variability • Microbial Risks
• Chemical Risks • Physical Risks • Radiological Risks Table 2 - Factors that may be considered during a risk assessment
14
Proposed National Certification Framework 2012The information required to undertake this rating will be determined through negotiation with the relevant state or territory water quality or health regulator. The rating will utilise the risk management process as described in Element 3 of the ADWG.
The resultant category informs the level of competency required under the Australian Qualifications Framework (AQF).
Criteria
1. The System Complexity Rating shall be performed by the Drinking Water Supplier and reported where required to the relevant state/territory regulator using a risk-based framework agreed with that regulator.
Note: Please refer to Table 2 above for examples of factors that may affect the complexity rating of a facility.
2. The Drinking Water Supplier shall ensure that the rating remains current. Where a change in conditions occurs that would be reasonably expected to affect the resultant score, the System Complexity Rating must be resubmitted using the process agreed with the relevant state or territory regulator. 3. The Drinking Water Supplier shall forward the System Complexity Rating to the
Certifying Body.
4. Where relevant, the Drinking Water Supplier shall inform any Independent
Contractor of the System Complexity Rating.
5. The Certifying Body shall maintain records of the System Complexity Rating and resultant category (Low/Medium/High).
15
Proposed National Certification Framework 2012Part Three – Operators in Scope
Part Three identifies the categories of certification that are the subject of this framework.
Rationale
Communities, employers and regulators must be assured that all operators who work within drinking water systems are identified within the certification framework..
The Certification Framework does not seek to influence the levels of responsibility and accountability inherent in an organisational structure. Drinking Water Suppliers must ensure that Certified Operators are sufficiently supported and that expectations of performance are realistic (i.e. aligned to the level of competency achieved).
Definitions
Operator in Training
An Operator who is gaining experience under the guidance of a Certified Operator performing routine tasks and undertaking relevant competency development which culminates in attainment of relevant competencies (from NWP07), as required by this Certification Framework.
The Operator in Training is not certified under this framework, but the Drinking Water Supplier is to ensure that opportunities are afforded to the person to develop all necessary competencies to achieve certified status.
Certified Operator
A Certified Operator has operational responsibility for water treatment processes or facilities. Duties performed will range from basic monitoring, sampling, testing and reporting, through to chemical dosing, control and optimisation of Treatment Processes. The Certified Operator may have responsibility for more than one Drinking Water Treatment System at any one time, so long as it is reasonable to expect that drinking water quality and safety will be assured across all systems and the Certified Operator’s current competencies cover all treatment processes for which they are responsible.
16
Proposed National Certification Framework 2012Independent Contractors
For the purposes of this framework, an independent contractor may provide expertise and services to other Drinking Water Suppliers;
Independent Contractors are not considered to be Drinking Water Suppliers. They are individuals (Certified Operators) who work within a Drinking Water System and must meet the minimum conditions stated in this Certification Framework.
Exclusions
Where workers who would not normally perform treatment tasks are called upon to assist in an unusual and unforeseen circumstance, the worker is not required to be certified under this framework but would be expected to have access to advice and guidance from a Certified Operator.
It is expected that the Drinking Water Supplier will be able to respond to emergencies, call-outs and unforeseen events and manage any immediate risk to drinking water safety.
17
Proposed National Certification Framework 2012Part Four - Competency Requirement
Part Four of this framework details the requirement for Certified Operators to undertake competency assessment.
Rationale
The actions of operators that treat drinking water have a direct impact on water quality and consequently may impact on the public health risk to communities.
Competency is attained through the completion of fit for purpose units of competency contained within the National Water Industry Training Package (currently NWP07). Fit for purpose units of competency are those that align with the treatment processes and/or associated monitoring, sampling and recording tasks. Part Two of this framework provides the basis for alignment of competency standards.
Although this Framework specifies the minimum competency requirement, Drinking Water Suppliers are strongly encouraged to support operators to achieve a formal qualification under the National Water Industry Training Package. The full qualification includes core units that also cover environmental and occupational health and safety issues which are relevant to water treatment but are not mandatory under this framework. There are many benefits to organisations to have staff undertake these core units.
Additionally, due to the complexity of many modern Drinking Water Treatment Systems it is likely that the additional training required to achieve a qualification will be minimal. There are a wide range of relevant units which help develop a competent operator. A decision to offer full qualifications may be influenced by:
• The level of investment in training by the employer;
• The availability of public funding for qualifications or part thereof; and • The level of prior knowledge and skills of the worker.
Full details of qualifications are contained within the Water Industry Training Package.
Access and Opportunity to undertake Competency Development
Identification of an Operator in Training by the Drinking Water Supplier enables new entrants to the industry to work within a Drinking Water Treatment System whilst obtaining the relevant competencies necessary for certification. The guidance provided in this part also applies to existing workers who may need up-skilling through the attainment of formal units of competency.
Drinking Water Suppliers are to provide adequate opportunities to allow new workers or existing workers who require up-skilling to develop their competencies and provide evidence for assessment in order to achieve the competencies required for certification. The following timeframes outline the maximum period an operator should take to complete all competency requirements, noting the need to balance training and workload:
18
Proposed National Certification Framework 2012 System ComplexityRating Timeframe for Training
Low 12 months
Medium 24 months
High 36 months
Table 3 - Maximum timeframes to achieve required competencies
Note: The Drinking Water Supplier should keep accurate records of Operators in Training to ensure that all operators are provided with adequate opportunity to develop the competencies and capabilities within the required timeframe.
Fit for Purpose Units of Competency
Fit for purpose mean that units align with the treatment processes and testing/monitoring processes specific to the Drinking Water Treatment System that have a water quality outcome.
Units of competency from the current Water Industry Training Package (NWP07) applicable to a Drinking Water Treatment System are provided at Appendix B. The units are presented in common clusters specific to the following process types:
• Disinfection only
• Sedimentation/Clarification • Dissolved Air Flotation • Direct Filtration • Membrane Filtration • Reverse Osmosis Table 4 following identifies:
• Expected outcomes for operators within Drinking Water Treatment Systems that align to the System Complexity Rating.
• Mandatory units aligned to the System Complexity Rating.
Please note that the competencies stipulated are correct at time of printing. Please check for the most current version by referring to www.training.gov.au, Government Skills Australia or your preferred training provider.
19
Proposed National Certification Framework 2012Complexity
Rating Fit For Purpose competency requirements
Mandatory Units
Low Complexity Fit for purpose units from
AQF level 2 from the NWP07. #
Units selected may or may not result in a qualification at Certificate level II.
• NWP279A Demonstrate knowledge of the risk management principles of the Australian Drinking Water Guidelines.
• NWP218B Perform and record sampling
Medium
Complexity Fit for purpose unis from AQF level 3 from NWP07 Disinfection units at AQF level 2 may also be required.
Units selected are likely to result in the award of a Certificate III
qualification.
• NWP279A Demonstrate knowledge of the risk management principles of the Australian Drinking Water Guidelines.
• NWP210B Perform Basic water quality tests
• NWP218B Perform and record sampling
High Complexity Fit for purpose units from
AQF level 4 where relevant from NWP07. Process control and disinfection units from AQF levels 2 and 3 may also be required
Units selected will likely result in award of
qualification at either Certificate level III or IV.
• NWP279A Demonstrate knowledge of the risk management principles of the Australian Drinking Water Guidelines.
• NWP210B Perform Basic water quality tests
• NWP218B Perform and record sampling
• NWP364B Perform laboratory testing
Table 4 - Competency requirements for Certified Operators
Notes:
• The minimum requirements stated in this part of the framework do not exclude an operator from undertaking units of competency or attaining a qualification that spans other water disciplines (e.g. wastewater, distribution, etc.). Please refer to packaging rules in NWP07.
• Operators are not required to attain a stated Mandatory Unit where an equivalent higher level unit of competency has already been achieved.
20
Proposed National Certification Framework 2012Units of Competency not suitable for Certification:
Drinking Water Suppliers and Registered Training Organisations (RTOs) may consider the following units of competency appropriate for workers in the water sector, however the units are not appropriate for certification:
• NWP260A Monitor and report water treatment processes is not appropriate to certify operators where conventional or highly complex processes are utilised unless accompanied by the appropriate AQF level 3 unit(s) specific to each process to which certification is to be applied.
• NWP345B Monitor, operate and control water treatment processes is not appropriate for certification of an operator who has regular drinking water treatment duties. The unit is intended to provide limited competency to workers who are not usually engaged in water treatment activities.
Criteria
1. Drinking Water Suppliers shall provide training and/or assessment opportunities to complete the requirements of Part Four of this framework in accordance with Table 3.
2. Operators shall complete all units of competency that are: • ‘Fit for purpose’; and
21
Proposed National Certification Framework 2012Part Five – Attaining Certification
Part Five details the capability requirement for entry into the Certification Framework.
Rationale
Skills and knowledge (i.e. competency) will be developed further through on the job experience and peer group engagement that is only achieved by working within a Drinking Water Treatment System.
By attaining certification, the operator will have been required to meet the competency requirements as outlined in Part Four of this Framework. However, certification aims to provide additional assurance to consumers, regulators and employers that the operator is able to perform under changing and sometimes challenging conditions.
In other words this part of the framework extends ‘demonstrated competency’ to include an indication of the capability of an operator to reliably perform under conditions that are difficult, challenging or non-routine.
Required Timeframes
The additional capability is attained through direct exposure to workplace conditions and by application of relevant skills and knowledge to the satisfaction of the Drinking Water Supplier. It can only be attained through participating in the operational setting unique to the Drinking Water Treatment System for a period not recommended to be less than:
System Complexity Rating Timeframe for Experience
Low 6 months inclusive of training
Medium 18 months inclusive of
training
High 24 months inclusive of
training
Table 5 - Minimum period for experience in a Drinking Water System
Where competencies are achieved in a lesser period, the recommended minimum period for experience still applies.
Awarding Certification
Certification shall be awarded on completion of all requirements detailed in Parts Four and Five of this Framework and is represented below:
22
Proposed National Certification Framework 2012Period of Certification
Certification is valid for a five (5) year period.
Credential
Certification shall result in the credential being issued that specifies: • Name of the Certified Operator
• Current date of issue and expiry
• Treatment Processes for which the person is certified
• Status (i.e. Active/Inactive)
Criteria
The operator shall:
• Be currently employed in an operational role.
• Have undertaken the minimum period for experience within a drinking water system as defined in Table 5.
The Drinking Water Supplier or Independent Contractor:
• Shall make an application to the Certifying Body supporting the suitability of experience of the operator to be certified. Table 5 shall be a guide as to an appropriate timeframe. The application will be made using the approved process supplied by the Certifying Body.
The Certifying Body shall:
• Upon assessment, and after ensuring that the minimum competency requirements have been met, issue a credential to the Certified Operator and a copy to the Drinking Water Supplier.
23
Proposed National Certification Framework 2012Part Six – Maintaining Certification
Part Six outlines the two pathways available to re-certify under this framework.
Rationale
Certified Operators must attain and maintain competencies to ensure their skills remain relevant and keep pace with changes to treatment processes, technology and consumer/regulatory expectations.
Maintenance of Certification is achieved by ensuring that the competencies and capabilities identified during initial certification remain current. This is achieved through on-going engagement within the water industry, participation in refresher and professional development activities and by responding to changes in conditions, responsibilities, technology or treatment processes.
Importantly, this framework recognises that each workplace is unique and will influence the method by which Drinking Water Suppliers will use the framework to ensure the competence of Certified Operators is maintained. These factors include the size of the workforce, the nature of the work being performed by the certified person, the geographic location and access to technology.
Relevancy of Competencies to the Drinking Water System
Certification recognises operators for their ability to perform drinking water treatment tasks related to specific processes only. In other words, it does not certify operators to work at a specific facility.
If a Certified Operator moves to another Drinking Water System or if an upgrade of a system occurs, the alignment of competencies held by the Certified Operator will need to be checked against the new Treatment Processes. Where a gap is identified, the Certified Operator retains their certified status, however the gap will be addressed and records of certification will be amended to identify new Treatment Processes.
Pathways for Re-certification
Pathway #1 – Participation in the Professional Development Program
Pathway 1 provides the opportunity for Certified Operators to re-certify by participation in professional development activities. Professional development does not just include training programs or conferences. Please refer to Appendix A for the list of approved professional development activities.
24
Proposed National Certification Framework 2012Records of professional development undertaken shall be maintained by the Drinking Water Supplier or Independent Contractor and shall be provided to the Certifying Body to support an application for continued certification. The points required for each period of certification are specified in Table 6.
Pathway #2 - Audit / Demonstration of current competence
The Drinking Water Supplier or the Certified Operator may elect to undertake a certification audit within three (3) months of the expiry of their certification.
The certification audit shall be performed by an operationally competent person, who is independent and approved or nominated by the certifying body using an appropriate audit methodology/tool.
The certification audit will provide evidence that the competence of the Certified Operator is current and relevant to the tasks performed at a particular treatment facility.
Criteria
• Regardless of the pathway chosen, Certified Operators must:
• Be currently undertaking treatment tasks aligned to their certification status in an operational role.
Note: Where a Certified Operator is participating in an activity for professional development at the time of -recertification, the Certifying Body will consider the operator to be in their substantive position.
• Meet the requirements of either Pathway 1 or 2 as follows:
o Pathway #1: Attain the minimum number of points aligned to the System
Complexity Rating as detailed in Table 6 below.
o Pathway #2: Demonstrate current competency through successfully
undertaking a certification audit of operational and developmental activities using the process administered by the Certifying Body.
• Ensure that the competencies held (as required in Part Four) remain directly relevant to the water treatment processes that are used within the system.
25
Proposed National Certification Framework 2012Extensions to Certification
Falling Short of Required Points in Pathway #1
• Where a Certified Operator has elected Pathway #1 but falls short of the required points during the period of certification:
• A three (3) month extension will be provided to achieve the remaining required points; or
• The Drinking Water Supplier may elect to meet the requirements of Pathway #2 within three (3) months of the expiry of certification.
Unsuccessfully completing the Audit in Pathway #2
• Where the audit is unable to confirm the competence of the Certified Operator: • A three (3) month extension will be provided.
• The Drinking Water Supplier shall plan and assist the certified person to address any shortfall or gap identified during the audit. Actions and outcomes shall be reported to the Certifying Body.
Continued shortfall after an extension
• Where the three month extension expires, the Certifying Body shall receive advice on a case-by-case basis. The certification status of a Certified Operator may be amended to ‘Inactive’ unless there are reasonable circumstances to extend the certification period further. Please refer to Part Seven for details of Active and Inactive Certification.
System Upgrades/Moving to a new water treatment system
• The Certification Body shall keep a record of the gap and all correspondence; however the status of the Certified Operator shall remain unchanged.
• The Certification Body shall monitor the progress of a Certified Operator to up-skill. Where the Certified Operator has not up-skilled within a reasonable period of time, the Certification Body shall review the status of certification on a case-by-case basis.
26
Proposed National Certification Framework 2012Summary of Competency, Capability and PD Requirements
Operator inTraining Certified Operator Initial Certification
Re-Certification
Complexity
Rating Competency Requirement Competency Requirement Capability Requirement Pathway #1 Required Points LOW Undertaking a training program aligned to fit-for-purpose units of competency
Units required within
12 months 6 months experience plus employer application.
5
MEDIUM Units completed
within 24 months 18 months experience plus employer application.
10
HIGH Units completed
within 36months 24 months experience plus employer application.
15
27
Proposed National Certification Framework 2012Part Seven – Certification Status
Part Seven of the framework allows for those that have let their status lapse or become inactive for a variety of reasons to re-apply for certification through a fair and simple process.
Rationale
Certified Operators experience periods of inactivity during their career which must not be discouraged or result in disadvantage through this framework.
The Certifying Body will assign a status to each Certified Operator to identify operators who are active or inactive. An operator may become inactive for a variety of reasons that are valid and reasonable. Examples include extended leave (such as parental leave), career progression and career breaks. Where a Certified Operator is identified as inactive, Drinking Water Suppliers should not make judgements about employment opportunities based only on the status of certification.
Active Certification
This category of certification shall be used to identify Certified Operators who currently meet all requirements as stated in this Framework.
Inactive Certification
• The Certifying Body may revise the status to ‘Inactive’ where the Certified Operator: • Is absent from an operational role for a period in excess of twenty four (24) months;
or
• Has been unable to meet the criteria as described in Pathway #1 or #2 as detailed in Part Five within a three (3) month extension period.
• Notification will be provided to the Drinking Water Supplier and Certified Operator where the certified status changes.
Revoked Status
• The Drinking Water Supplier must inform the Certifying Body where employment of a Certified Operator has been terminated for a serious breach. The Certifying Body will examine the specific circumstances and may amend the certification status to ‘Revoked’ as a result of the notification.
Please note that Part 8 requires the Certifying Body to allow for a formal appeals process.
28
Proposed National Certification Framework 2012Criteria for Re-entry
• Certified Operators who currently meet all requirements as stated in this Framework shall be identified as Active by the Certifying Body.
• Where an ‘Inactive’ operator seeks to return to ‘Active’ status, the Drinking Water Supplier shall:
• Cause an audit of current competency to occur as outlined in Pathway #2 of Part Six.
• Upon successfully completing the audit or addressing any gaps identified, shall apply to the Certifying Body to have the status of the Certified Operator revised to ‘Active’. Evidence of the audit and any gap training shall accompany the application.
29
Proposed National Certification Framework 2012Part Eight – Certification Management
Rationale
The administration functions performed by the Certifying Body must be performed in a manner that ensures the integrity of this framework and provides national portability for certified operators.
Administration
The Certifying Body shall ensure that sufficient resources are allocated to effectively manage, administer and participate in the review of the Certification Framework.
Governance activities and administrative processes shall be documented through formal policies.
The Certifying Body shall ensure that it has national coverage and maintain independence from:
• A Registered Training Organisation (RTO) or affiliate* • A Drinking Water Supplier
• A state or territory regulator
* An RTO affiliate is an organisation that has entered into a partnership arrangement to delivery nationally recognised training or is a member of an RTO Board of Governance.
Records Management
Type of Record
• To ensure that the Certification Framework remains an effective strategy to meet its stated objective, a database shall be maintained by the Certifying Body and shall include the following details:
ORGANISATIONAL INFORMATION
• The details of the Drinking Water Treatment System including:
o Name of the Drinking Water Supplier;
o Name of an Independent Contractor’s Business where relevant; o Location and business name (where relevant) of each Drinking Water
Treatment System;
o The treatment processes present within each Drinking Water Treatment
System; and
o The System Complexity Rating for each Drinking Water Treatment System.
PERSONNEL INFORMATION
• Details of each Certified Operator including:
o Name;
o Business Address/Contact details; o Certification Number;
30
Proposed National Certification Framework 2012o Entry and Expiry date for current certification. o Employer Details;
o Status – Active / Inactive / Revoked;
o List of treatment processes for which the certified member is currently
competent; and
o List of units of competency achieved including the issuing RTO(s)
Note: The Drinking Water Supplier must advise the Certifying Body of any changes that impact upon certification as described in Part Six.
Currency of Records
• The Drinking Water Supplier must advise the certifying body of any change to the Certified Operator’s records in relation to any change to treatment processes including any change in the complexity rating of the system.
Access to personal records
Certified Operators, the Drinking Water Supplier and the regulatory body responsible for public health in the relevant state or territory can apply to the Certifying Body to access the relevant personal records for the purpose of validating current competency.
• Documented authority from the Certified Operator will be received prior to the release of any information to any other third party.
• Where information is released to any party, a full record of the information that was supplied shall be maintained by the nominate Certifying Body.
• Relevant state and territory privacy and confidentiality statutory requirements will apply to all applications.
Records Retention
• The Certifying Body shall maintain records for all persons with an Active, Inactive or Revoked certification status.
• Records shall be disposed of in accordance with the Records Retention Policy of the Certifying Body. The policy shall require that details of certification shall be retained for 30 years. This does not include retention of any supporting materials.
• In the event that the Certifying Body discontinues business, all records shall be safeguarded and provided to the relevant authority as directed.
Appeals
• Where a Drinking Water Supplier or Certified Operator is dissatisfied with a judgement or process used by the Certifying Body an appeal may be lodged in accordance with the Appeals Policy.
The policy shall ensure that the appeals process is confidential, equitable and transparent. The policy shall ensure that no stakeholder is vilified, victimised or subject to discrimination.
31
Proposed National Certification Framework 2012Appendix A – Approved Professional Development
Activity
Details
Points
Attend a training session approved or conducted by a state/territory regulator or mandated as refresher training
Examples include the NSW Office of Water Update Seminar and the Victorian Dept of Health Water Industry Issues course.
3 points
Complete additional units of competency applicable to drinking water treatment at AQF level 2
Units from a training package other than NWP07 must relate specifically to drinking water treatment.
3 points for each unit Complete additional units of
competency applicable to potable water treatment at AQF level 3
Units from a training package other than NWP07 must relate specifically to drinking water treatment.
4 points for each unit Complete additional units of
competency applicable to potable water treatment at AQF level 4
Units from a training package other than NWP07 must relate specifically to drinking water treatment.
5 points for each unit Complete additional
non-accredited relevant, process based, refresher training.
The training course will be relevant to drinking water treatment systems. The course must include some form of assessment.
4 points
Attend a peak water
industry annual conference Peak industry associations include: • Australian Water Association • Water Industry Operators Association • Water Services Association of Australia
1 point per day attended Attend a water industry
conference, trade show, field day, specialty event or meeting with published agenda
These events are typically facilitated by professional associations, education or training providers (e.g. universities or RTOs), manufacturers or distributors.
1 point per day attended to a
maximum of 3 points
Attend a specialist seminar or workshop relevant to drinking water treatment
Examples include:
• CRC Road shows and workshops • IWES short courses
• Water Treatment Alliance Filter Optimisation workshop
• WIOA workshops
2 points per day attended
32
Proposed National Certification Framework 2012 Attend an in-house trainingcourse specific to drinking water treatment
The course must be a formal training program with documented learning outcomes. 1 point per day attended to a maximum of 3 points
Mentoring of a junior staff
member Mentoring must be through a formal arrangement with scheduled meetings/activities over an extended period of time.
4 points
Present a technical paper at a water industry conference or seminar
A 20 minute presentation is the minimum standard as an indicator of the level of research/technical expertise.
5 points Write and submit a poster
presentation at an event 2 points
Write, submit and present a poster presentation at a drinking water industry event
3 points
Submit an article that is published in a water industry or relevant technical journal
Examples include: • AWA Water Magazine • WIOA WaterWorks Magazine
• Any other industry recognised journal
5 points
Complete a significant
workplace project Examples include: • Analysis of performance membranes in an RO plant
• Research and recommend process for eradication of mosquitoes in a WWTP • Investigation and implementation of
plant process improvements
Points to be allocated on a case by case basis. A maximum of 10 points will apply. Participate in a rotation
program or perform higher duties for professional development
The program must be formalised with
stated objectives/outcomes 2 points
Provide public presentation in relation to the drinking water treatment system
Examples include the provision of a tour to an external industry, community or school group
2 Subscribe to an industry
periodical Operators should demonstrate that their knowledge of drinking water system issues is current.
1 Recognition of achievement
through an industry
development award or prize
Examples include: • Churchill Fellowships • IWA (Vic) Award • WIOA Kwatye prize
33
Proposed National Certification Framework 2012Appendix B – Water Treatment Units of Competency
Unit
Code
Unit Title
D is in fe ct io n O nl y Se di me nt at io n Cl ar if ic at io Dissol ved Ai r Flo ta ti on D irec t Fi ltr at io n M em bra ne Fi ltr at io n Rev er se Os mo si s
Units generally applicable to Low, Medium and High Complexity Systems
NWP210B Perform basic water quality tests NWP218B Perform and record sampling
NWP268B Monitor, operate and report chlorine disinfection systems NWP273A Monitor, operate and report UV disinfection systems NWP274A Monitor, operate and report ozone treatment systems NWP275A Monitor, operate and report chlorine dioxide systems
NWP366A Monitor, operate and control chloramination disinfection systems NWP276A Monitor, operate and report fluoridation systems
Units generally applicable to Medium and High Complexity Systems (in addition to any of the relevant units described above)
NWP347B Monitor, operate and control coagulation and flocculation processes NWP348B Monitor, operate and control sedimentation and clarification processes NWP352B Monitor, operate and control dissolved air flotation processes
NWP354B Monitor, operate and control granular media processes NWP355B Monitor, operate and control membrane filtration processes NWP356B Monitor, operate and control ion exchange processes
NWP357B Monitor, operate and control reverse osmosis and non filtration processes NWP360B Monitor, operate and control dewatering processes
NWP364B Perform laboratory testing
NWP367A Monitor, operate and control activated carbon adsorption processes
Units generally applicable to High Complexity systems (in addition to any of the relevant units described above)
NWP406A Investigate and report on optimisation of granular media filtration processes NWP407A Investigate and report on optimisation of dissolved air filtration processes
NWP408A Investigate and report on optimisation of sedimentation and clarification processes NWP409A Investigate and report on optimisation of chemical addition, coagulation and
flocculation processes
NWP404A Apply knowledge of chemistry to water industry
NWP411A Select the treatment requirements for waterborne micro-organisms
Generally Applicable Unit
Possible Unit dependent on process Generally Not Applicable
34
Proposed National Certification Framework 2012Glossary
Australian Qualification Framework (AQF)
The AQF is the national policy for regulated qualifications in Australian education and training. AQF Qualifications certify the knowledge and skills that a person has achieved through study, training, work and life experience. Units of competency in the National Water Industry Training Package identify to a particular AQF level based on the complexity, specialisation and breadth of the unit.
Certification
A national program of recognition afforded to workers who have met industry defined minimum entry standards. This Certification Framework is underpinned by a need to ensure the provision of safe drinking water through minimum standards of certification for water treatment operators.
Certified Operator
A Certified Operator has operational responsibility for water treatment processes or facilities. Duties performed will range from basic sampling, testing and reporting, through to chemical dosing, control and optimisation of treatment processes.
The Certified Operator may have responsibility for more than one treatment systems at any one time, so long as it is reasonable to expect that drinking water quality and safety will be assured at all plants and the Certified Operator’s current competencies cover all treatment processes under the responsibility of that person.
Consumer
A recipient of drinking water who is:
• An individual, community, city, town or state (public) • A guest, customer or employee (private)
Drinking Water Supplier
An organisation/enterprise (public or private) or, individual that provides drinking water for human consumption. The Drinking Water Supplier includes, but is not limited to: • major urban utility,
• corporation
• local government authority, • public or private entity, • small, regional or remote, • wholesaler, retailer or contractor
Any organisation contracted to manage a Drinking Water System (or part thereof) is considered to be a Drinking Water Supplier.
35
Proposed National Certification Framework 2012Drinking Water Treatment System
–
Are a component of the Drinking Water Supply System as defined at Element 3.2 of the ADWG. Drinking Water Treatment Systems provide water intended for human consumption that;
• Does not pass through any treatment barriers; or
• Is treated by a single barrier or multiple barrier drinking water treatment facility. Where a water treatment facility exists, the Drinking Water Treatment System is inclusive of downstream chemical dosing and disinfection.
It does not include direct or indirect drinking water recycling/re-use schemes.
Independent Contractors
For the purposes of this framework, an independent contractor may provide expertise and services to other Drinking Water Suppliers;
Independent Contractors are not considered to be Drinking Water Suppliers. They are individuals (Certified Operators) who work within a Drinking Water System and must meet the minimum conditions stated in this Certification Framework.
Operator in Training
An Operator who is gaining experience under the guidance of a Certified Operator performing routine tasks and undertaking relevant competency development which culminates in attainment of relevant competencies (from NWP07), as required by this Certification Framework.
The Operator in Training is not certified under this framework, but the Drinking Water Supplier is to ensure that opportunities are afforded to the person to develop all necessary competencies to achieve certified status.
Registered Training Organisation
Training providers that are registered by a national or state regulator to deliver Nationally Recognised Training in the Australian Vocational Education and Training Sector.
Qualification
Issued under the Australian Qualification Framework (AQF) by a Registered Training Organisation (RTO) as a result of completing a formal training and/or assessment pathway. Qualifications are defined in Industry Training Packages or accredited through the national, state or territory accrediting body for Vocational Education and Training (VET).
Treatment Process
Any process within a Water Treatment System that changes the physical, chemical or biological properties of water derived from any source in order to make it safe for human consumption or to make it comply with a regulatory order relating to human consumption. Treatment processes include, but are not limited to:
• Primary and Secondary Disinfection • Coagulation and Flocculation
• Reverse Osmosis • Adsorption
36
Proposed National Certification Framework 2012 • Sedimentation and Clarification• Dissolved Air Flotation • Granular Filtration Membrane Filtration
• Ion Exchange Fluoridation • Softening/Hardening • Chemical Dosing
Unit of Competency
A single component of a qualification or a stand-alone unit that has been accredited through the same process as a Qualification.
Vocational Education and Training (VET)
Post-compulsory education and training, excluding degree and higher level programs delivered by higher education institutions (Registered Training Organisations), which provides people with occupational or work-related knowledge and skills. VET also includes programs which provide the basis for subsequent vocational programs or higher education programs.
