Comprehensiveness of
Workplace Violence Prevention Programs
in Home Health and Hospice Care
2011 Joint Meeting Safe States Alliance, SAVIR, CDC Core I & II
Collaborators
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
(Carri Casteel and Maryalice Nocera)
University of Iowa
(Corinne Peek-Asa)
California Department of Public Health
(Robert Harrison)
University of California, San Francisco
Background
Home health care projected to be fourth
fastest growing industry in U.S. (2008-2018)
Nonfatal assault rate for home health workers
exceeds workforce by nearly 50%
Violence hazards include aggressive patients
and provision of care in uncontrolled settings
Cal/OSHA Guidelines
Provide recommendations for developing a
comprehensive security program to protect
health care workers from violence
Management commitment and employee
involvement
Worksite analysis
Objective
Identify which Cal/OSHA guideline
recommendations exist in home health care
agency workplace violence prevention
programs
Target Population
Six home health and hospice care agencies in
Northern California
Agency control: for-profit (n=2),
nonprofit-private (n=2), nonprofit-public (n=2)
Branches within agencies: n=43
Recruitment
Branch Managers
Recruited by phone with approval from agency
administrators
40 of 43 (93%) branch managers participated
Branches: Home health (n=25), hospice (n=13),
both home health and hospice (n=2)
Data Collection
Self-Administered Survey
Branch-level workplace violence prevention
policies, procedures and training
Phone Interview
Detail about branch-level strategies to protect
workers from violence, with focus on multiple hazard levels: patient, patient’s home, patient’s neighborhood
9
Workplace Violence Prevention (WVP)
Programs
Workplace Violence Prevention Programs
N (%)
Branch has a WVP program
Among branches with a program (n=22):
22 (55.0)
Branch has a written WVP program 20 (90.9) Program is reviewed and updated at
Management Commitment and
Employee Involvement
11
N (%)
Agency has a safety committee that
addresses WVP 33 (82.5)
Among branches with safety committee:
Home health/hospice workers serve
on committee 31 (93.9)
Regularly scheduled meetings to
Assessment of Hazards
Before First Visit N (%) At first Visit N (%) Other Time N (%) Patient•
History of violent behavior•
History of mental illness 22 (59.5) 27 (73.0) 11 (29.7) 10 (27.0) 6 (16.2) 3 (8.1)Assessment of Hazards (cont’d)
Before First Visit N (%) At first Visit N (%) Other Time N (%) Household•
Violence•
Substance use•
Guns•
Pets Neighborhood•
Criminal activity 6 (16.2) 7 (18.9) 15 (40.5) 23 (62.2) 9 (2.3) 20 (54.1) 17 (46.0) 15 (40.5) 18 (48.7) 3 (8.1) 8 (21.6) 5 (13.5) 3 (8.1) 8 (21.6) 0 13WVP Policies and Procedures
N (%)
Policies and procedures to protect workers from:
o Violent or aggressive patients
o Violent or aggressive household
members and visitors
o Violence in the community
31 (77.5) 24 (60.0) 20 (50.0)
15
WVP Policies and Procedures (cont’d)
N (%)
Policies and procedures to protect workers from:
o Violence perpetrated by other
workers in the agency
o Intimate partner violence while on
the job
28 (70.0) 3 (7.5)
Safety and Health Training
New
N (%) Ongoing N (%)
All frontline workers trained 3 (16.7) 3 (13.6) N (%)
Training to new hires
Ongoing training to employees
18 (45.0) 22 (55.0)
17
Training Content N (%)New Ongoing N (%)
Factors predicting violence and aggression
Characteristics of aggressive and violent patients and
families Characteristics of hazardous households Characteristics of hazardous neighborhoods 11 (61.1) 12 (66.7) 10 (55.6) 10 (55.6) 11 (50.0) 13 (59.1) 13 (59.1) 12 (54.6)
Training Content (cont’d) N (%)New Ongoing N (%)
Verbal methods to diffuse aggressive behavior
Physical maneuvers to diffuse or avoid aggressive behavior
Self-defense if preventive action does not work
Policies and methods for reporting a violent event
11 (61.1) 8 (44.4) 10 (55.6) 15 (83.3) 14 (66.7) 12 (54.6) 9 (42.9) 16 (72.7)
19
Recordkeeping and Program Evaluation
N (%)
Branch maintains system for reporting violent events
Strategies evaluated following a violent event
o Identify factors that may have
contributed to event
o Monitor trends in violent incidents o Evaluate effectiveness of existing
measures in reducing or eliminating violent events
35 (87.5)
21 (8.3) 17 (6.7) 16 (6.3)
Conclusions
Home health and hospice care branches have
gaps in their workplace violence prevention
programs
About half did not have programs
About half did not train all workers who see
patients in the home