• No results found

Changes in human behavior for a future mobility: Are they necessary, possible, and feasible?

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Changes in human behavior for a future mobility: Are they necessary, possible, and feasible?"

Copied!
21
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

Dr Peter de Haan, Ernst Basler + Partner, Zollikon, Switzerland

Dr Anja Peters, ISI Fraunhofer, Karlsruhe, Germany

Changes in human behavior for a

future mobility: Are they necessary,

possible, and feasible?

(2)

Table of contents

1. The 130 g CO

2

/km target for average new passenger car

registrations in 2015

2. Autonomous Technical Potential for annual fuel

reductions in new cars

3. To which extent are changes in human behavior, notably

new car purchase behavior, necessary?

4. Are they possible? Which levers exist to change car

purchase behavior?

(3)

Changes in human (car purchase) behavior – are they necessary, possible, and feasible?

3

(4)

1. 130 g CO

2

/km target for new cars in 2015

6 g CO

2

/km = 1 t

CO

2

, over 160‘000 km

EU‘s 130 g CO

2

/km regulation:

>2019 € 95 / g

570 EUR/t CO2!

Mobility is fundamentally different from other sectors;

consumers still pay more for higher fuel consumption;

mobility is

time- and space-constrained,

(5)

Changes in human (car purchase) behavior – are they necessary, possible, and feasible?

1. 130 g CO

2

/km target for new cars in 2015

95 g target:

assumed for

2023

(otherwise, annual

eff. increases

2016-2022 above those

for 2010-2015)

5

(6)

2. Autonomous Technical Potential (ATP)

Autonomous Technical Potential

= observed CO

2

reduction

+ „wasted“ CO

2

reduction potential due to weight

increase

and

due to higher power-to-mass

“wasted” CO

2

reduction due to weight increase =

0.75*relative weight increase

“wasted” CO

2

reduction due to power-to-mass increase =

(7)

Changes in human (car purchase) behavior – are they necessary, possible, and feasible?

2. Autonomous Technical Potential (ATP)

2001-2010 averaging period:

ATP = 2.20% + 0.75*0.60% + 0.5% *0.5% = 2.89%/a

7

1

g CO2/km empty weight

rated power power-to-mass displacement

unit

g/km

kg

kW

kW/kg

ccm

Average 1991-2010

-2.00%

1.00%

1.40%

0.40%

-0.20%

Average 2001-2010

-2.20%

0.60%

1.10%

0.50%

-0.60%

Average 2008-2010

-3.60%

-1.00%

-0.30%

0.70%

-2.60%

(8)

2. Autonomous Technical Potential (ATP)

New car registrations can reduce CO

2

emissions by

– 2.89%/a, if weight and power-to-mass ratio constant

If CO

2

emissions are to be decreased faster

reduce weight and/or power-to-mass ratio

(9)

Changes in human (car purchase) behavior – are they necessary, possible, and feasible?

3. Are changes in car purchase behavior

necessary?

Switzerland, 2010 to 2015:

annual changes of –3.72% in fuel consumption needed

this exceeds the ATP of –2.89%

–0.83% have to come from behavioral changes

7:2 split (technological:behavioral reduction)

(10)

3. Are changes in car purchase behavior

necessary?

EU:

130 g target can be reached solely through ATP

95 g for ca. 2023: annual reductions of –3.83% over the

full time span from 2015 to 2023.

–0.95% annually from behavioral changes

3:1 ratio (technological:behavioral changes)

(assuming that Switzerland meets the 130 g target in 2015, the latter also

applies to Switzerland)

(11)

Changes in human (car purchase) behavior – are they necessary, possible, and feasible?

4. Levers to change car purchase behavior

For effective measures to change behavior

psychological factors should be considered

Socio-psychological model from Peters et al:

- Explains car purchase by private consumers

- Survey data from 302 Swiss respondents whose

households have bought a new car since 2002

- Structural equation model (SEM)-based analyses

(12)

4. Levers to change car purchase behavior

attitude +

perceived

behavioral

control

= direct

predictors

Problem awareness, symbolic motives, and response

(13)

Changes in human (car purchase) behavior – are they necessary, possible, and feasible?

4. Levers to change car purchase behavior

13

Factor

Examples of measures

Attitude

Information about variety of efficient vehicles

Incentives (also non-financial)

Perceived behaviour control

Point out individual behavioural options

Information and guidance

Personal norm

Illustrate consequences of own behaviour

Response efficacy

Illustrate consequences of own behaviour

Point out individual behavioural options

Symbolic motives

Promote popular image of efficient vehicles

Popular / public role models driving efficient vehicles

Social norm

Popular / public role models driving efficient vehicles

(14)

4. Consumers have several options

no veh. on market

segment exists

A

A-label veh. avail.

Segment

luxury

A

fullsize

A

A

A

A

A

A

SUV

van

A

A

A

small SUV

A

A

large cars

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

compact van

A

A

A

A

A

A

compact/medium

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

small car

A

A

A

A

micro cra

A

A

A

<20

-25

-30

-35

-40

-45

-50

-55

-60

-65

-70

>70

(15)

Changes in human (car purchase) behavior – are they necessary, possible, and feasible?

5. Technical characteristics of cars in the future

15

specific

empty

relative

Year

ATP

CO

2

emission

weight

power

[% p.a.]

[g CO

2

/km]

[kg]

[kW/t]

2009

167.3

1448

73.2

2010-2015

-3.72%

-4.12%

-0.97%

0.66%

2015

130.0

1366

76.2

2016-2020

-3.08%

-3.50%

-1.00%

0.67%

2020

108.8

1299

78.7

2021-2030

-2.48%

-2.90%

-1.00%

0.67%

2030

81.1

1175

84.2

(16)

Swiss new registrations, 130g scenario, 2010

0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 160 170 180 190 200 210 220 230 240 250 >=250

CO

2

[g/km]

0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 2 2. 5 3 3. 5 4 4. 5 5 5. 5 6 6. 5 7 7. 5 8 8. 5 9 9. 5 10 10 .5 11 11 .5 12 >=12

Treibstoffverbrauch [Liter/100 km]

10% 15% 20% 25% 30%

Leistung [kW]

0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800 1900 2000 2100 2200 2300 2400 2500 >=2500

Hubraum [ccm]

0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800 1900 2000 2100 2200 2300 2400 2500 >=2500

Leergewicht [kg]

10% 15% 20% 25% 30%

Gesamtgewicht [kg]

(17)

Changes in human (car purchase) behavior – are they necessary, possible, and feasible?

17

Swiss new registrations, 130g scenario, 2014

0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 160 170 180 190 200 210 220 230 240 250 >=250

CO

2

[g/km]

0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 2 2. 5 3 3. 5 4 4. 5 5 5. 5 6 6. 5 7 7. 5 8 8. 5 9 9. 5 10 10 .5 11 11 .5 12 >=12

Treibstoffverbrauch [Liter/100 km]

15% 20% 25% 30%

Leistung [kW]

0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800 1900 2000 2100 2200 2300 2400 2500 >=2500

Hubraum [ccm]

0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800 1900 2000 2100 2200 2300 2400 2500 >=2500

Leergewicht [kg]

10% 15% 20% 25% 30%

Gesamtgewicht [kg]

(18)

Swiss new registrations, 130g scenario, 2018

0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 160 170 180 190 200 210 220 230 240 250 >=250

CO

2

[g/km]

0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 2 2. 5 3 3. 5 4 4. 5 5 5. 5 6 6. 5 7 7. 5 8 8. 5 9 9. 5 10 10 .5 11 11 .5 12 >=12

Treibstoffverbrauch [Liter/100 km]

10% 15% 20% 25% 30%

Leistung [kW]

0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800 1900 2000 2100 2200 2300 2400 2500 >=2500

Hubraum [ccm]

0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800 1900 2000 2100 2200 2300 2400 2500 >=2500

Leergewicht [kg]

10% 15% 20% 25% 30%

Gesamtgewicht [kg]

(19)

Changes in human (car purchase) behavior – are they necessary, possible, and feasible?

19

Swiss new registrations, 130g scenario, 2022

0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 160 170 180 190 200 210 220 230 240 250 >=250

CO

2

[g/km]

0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 2 2. 5 3 3. 5 4 4. 5 5 5. 5 6 6. 5 7 7. 5 8 8. 5 9 9. 5 10 10 .5 11 11 .5 12 >=12

Treibstoffverbrauch [Liter/100 km]

15% 20% 25% 30%

Leistung [kW]

0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800 1900 2000 2100 2200 2300 2400 2500 >=2500

Hubraum [ccm]

0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800 1900 2000 2100 2200 2300 2400 2500 >=2500

Leergewicht [kg]

10% 15% 20% 25% 30%

Gesamtgewicht [kg]

(20)

Swiss new registrations, 130g scenario, 2026

0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 160 170 180 190 200 210 220 230 240 250 >=250

CO

2

[g/km]

0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 2 2. 5 3 3. 5 4 4. 5 5 5. 5 6 6. 5 7 7. 5 8 8. 5 9 9. 5 10 10 .5 11 11 .5 12 >=12

Treibstoffverbrauch [Liter/100 km]

10% 15% 20% 25% 30%

Leistung [kW]

0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800 1900 2000 2100 2200 2300 2400 2500 >=2500

Hubraum [ccm]

0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800 1900 2000 2100 2200 2300 2400 2500 >=2500

Leergewicht [kg]

10% 15% 20% 25% 30%

Gesamtgewicht [kg]

(21)

Changes in human (car purchase) behavior – are they necessary, possible, and feasible?

21

Swiss new registrations, 130g scenario, 2030

0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 160 170 180 190 200 210 220 230 240 250 >=250

CO

2

[g/km]

0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 2 2. 5 3 3. 5 4 4. 5 5 5. 5 6 6. 5 7 7. 5 8 8. 5 9 9. 5 10 10 .5 11 11 .5 12 >=12

Treibstoffverbrauch [Liter/100 km]

15% 20% 25% 30%

Leistung [kW]

0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800 1900 2000 2100 2200 2300 2400 2500 >=2500

Hubraum [ccm]

0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800 1900 2000 2100 2200 2300 2400 2500 >=2500

Leergewicht [kg]

10% 15% 20% 25% 30%

Gesamtgewicht [kg]

References

Related documents

Management Research: Applying the Principles © 2015 Susan Rose, Nigel Spinks &amp; Ana Isabel Canhoto 2 the context of qualitative research but we will use the term QCA to

The social accounting literature has informed the secondary research questions emerging from this chapter, which include attention to ways in which CSR has

We have had good comments from our membership on the agency reports by Jack Huber (Youth Challenge Academy) and Jack Hart (Park Place Outreach) and we will continue having these

Valery Simeon and the CARE staff referred to knowledge capacity as the first essential component in the CMDRR process, where the participants learned about risk, natural hazards

3 NuSTAR and Suzaku X-ray Spectroscopy of NGC 4151: Evidence for Reflection from the Inner Accretion Disk 26 3.1 Observations and Data

Soil properties and its classification, system: Definition of soil, soil as a three phase system, weight – volume relationship Density of Soil, relative density,

untuk pengujian PLC dibuatkan aplikasi PLCmikro yaitu Getaran Sensor menggunakan piezoelectric dan Pengendalian Lampu lalu lintas, aplikasi komunikasi serial Human

Our experiments show the promising potential of our new approach: Although each node starts with a random cluster number, may communicate only with its direct neighbors within