• No results found

Solar Activity, Solar Wind and Geomagnetic Signatures

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2020

Share "Solar Activity, Solar Wind and Geomagnetic Signatures"

Copied!
8
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

Loading

Figure

Figure 1f the aa indices. The top panel illustrates the year 1974,
Figure 2 extends the Legrand and Simon [1]’s work to include 32 more years of data. It shows the yearly per- centage of occurrence of each class of geomagnetic ac- tivity from 1868 through 2009.long time variations of QA, RA, SA, FA, and SSN re- spectively
Figure 3(b)important in 1976, 1981 and 1986 (~37%) and makes its
Figure 5. The range of solar wind speeds for recurrent activity: (a) Solar cycle 20; (b) Solar cycle 21; (c) Solar cycle 22 and (d) Solar cycle 23
+2

References

Related documents

In the current case, a novel 15-bp deletion in the FLNC gene showed an autosomal dominant inheritance pattern and caused muscle weakness in all limbs, a mildly ele- vated serum level

DIF: Differential item functioning; GRM: Graded response model; IRT: Item response theory; IRTLRDIF: Item response theory likelihood-ratio tests for differential item

Advantage of Vogel’s approximation method and Minimum-cost method yields the best starting basic solution because gives initial solution very near to optimal solution but

This paper presents the underlying concepts of managing Quality of Service in a computer network. It shows that techniques used, namely 1) over-provisioning; 2) buffering; 3)

Assuming that luxury vehicle manufacturers can inherit existing problems within the communication strategies and challenges regarding setting up of customer’s requirements from

Objective Strategy Microrganism Results Reference Growth, sporulation and δ-endotoxin production in oxygen limited and non-limited cultures Production of crystals and

Comparative iTRAQ™ protein expression analysis between TOV-81D and TOV-112D epithelial ovarian cancer model cell lines.. The Gene Ontology classification of differentially

Street network geocoding also had a signifi- cantly higher median positional error than parcel geocoding when stratified by study area, with the ex- ception of the South