Pathophysiology of protracted acute renal
failure in man.
S M Moran, B D Myers
J Clin Invest.
1985;76(4):1440-1448. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI112122.
Postischemic acute renal failure (ARF) induced by cardiac surgery is commonly prolonged
and may be irreversible. To examine whether persistence of postischemic, tubular cell injury
accounts for delayed recovery from ARF, we studied 10 patients developing protracted (36
+/- 4 d) ARF after cardiac surgery. The differential clearance and excretion dynamics of
probe solutes of graded size were determined. Inulin clearance was depressed (5.0 +/- 1.7
ml/min), while the fractional urinary clearance of dextrans (radii 17-30 A) were elevated
above unity. Employing a model of conservation of mass, we calculated that 44% of filtered
inulin was lost via transtubular backleak. The clearance and fractional backleak of
technetium-labeled DTPA ([99mTc]DTPA, radius = 4 A) were identical to those of inulin
(radius 15 A). The time at which inulin or DTPA excretion reached a maximum after an
intravenous bolus injection was markedly delayed when compared with control subjects
with ARF of brief duration, 102 vs. 11 min. Applying a three-compartment model of
inulin/DTPA kinetics (which takes backleak into account) revealed the residence time of
intravenously administered inulin/DTPA in the compartment occupied by tubular fluid and
urine to be markedly prolonged, 20 vs. 6 min in controls, suggesting reduced velocity of
tubular fluid flow. We conclude that protracted human ARF is characterized by transtubular
backleak of glomerular ultrafiltrate, such that inulin clearance underestimates […]
Research Article
Find the latest version:
Pathophysiology of Protracted Acute Renal Failure in Man
S. Mark Moranand Bryan D. Myers
Division ofNephrology, Stanford University School ofMedicine, Stanford, California94305
Abstract
Postischemic acute renal failure (ARF) induced by cardiac sur-gery is commonly prolonged and may be irreversible. To examine whether persistenceof postischemic, tubular cell injury accounts for delayed recoveryfrom ARF, we studied 10 patientsdeveloping protracted (36±4 d) ARF after cardiac surgery. The differential clearance andexcretiondynamics of probe solutes of graded size were determined. Inulin clearance was depressed (5.0±1.7
ml/
min), while the fractional urinary clearance of dextrans (radii 17-30A)were elevated above unity. Employing a model of con-servation ofmass, we calculated that 44%of filteredinulinwas lost via transtubular backleak. The clearance and fractional backleak oftechnetium-labeled DTPA(Ir"TcIDTPA,
radius=4
A)
wereidenticalto thoseof inulin (radius 15A).
The time atwhich inulinor DTPAexcretionreached amaximum after an intravenous bolusinjectionwas markedly delayed when compared with control subjects with ARFof briefduration, 102 vs. 11 min. Applyinga three-compartment modelof inulin/DTPA kinetics (which takes backleak into account) revealed the residence time ofintravenously administeredinulin/DTPAin the compartment occupied by tubular fluidand urine to be markedly prolonged, 20vs.6min in controls, suggestingreduced velocity oftubular fluid flow.We concludethatprotractedhuman ARFis charac-terizedby transtubular backleakof glomerularultrafiltrate,such that inulin clearance underestimates true glomerular filtration rate by -50%,and bysluggishtubularfluidflow,whichstrongly suggests the existence ofsevere and generalized intraluminal tubularobstruction.Because allpatientsalsoexhibitedextreme hyperreninemia (16±2 ng/mlperh)that wasinverselyrelated toinulin clearance (rvalue = -0.83) and urine flow (rvalue= -0.70), wepropose thatpersistent, angiotensin II-mediated renalvasoconstriction may havedelayedhealing oftheinjured tubularepithelium.
Introduction
Areversible form ofacute renalexcretoryfailurehaslongbeen known to occur in maninthe wake ofan
episode
of transient circulatory failure. Formerly, thispostischemic
renalinjury
wascharacterized byaninitial
period
ofoliguria
whichpersisted
in thetypicalcasefor7-10 d.Thereafter,
adiureticphase
ensued that heralded the onset ofa gradual recovery from azotemia overthesubsequent 7-10 d(1,2). Thisacuterenalinjury
has beenaccuratelysimulated inexperimental animals by transiently interrupting renal blood flow for 40-60 min.Micropuncture
Addressreprint requests to Dr. Myers, Division of Nephrology, S2 15. Receivedfor publication7December 1984 and inrevisedform3 June 1985.
studies have revealed that the oliguric phase of postischemic, acuterenalfailure
(ARF)'
iscaused in large part by intraluminal tubularobstruction accompaniedby backleakofa large fraction of glomerular filtrateacross anecrotic tubular wall (3-7). As in thehuman injury,recoveryfrompostischemicARF in the rat typically begins duringthe second weekaftertheischemic insult. Itis characterizedby anincrement inrenalperfusionrate, relief of intraluminal obstruction of tubules, and restoration of im-permeability ofthe tubular wall to the smallfiltrationmarker, inulin(7,8).Overthe past decadeit has become routine practice to ad-minister to susceptible patients protective substances such as mannitol, furosemide, and dopamine before or during an isch-emicrenalinsult. Withtheadoption of this practice, an isolated single episode ofrenalischemiano longer appearssufficientto induceovert renal excretory failure in most instances (9). Rather, moreprolonged and often repeated episodes of renal ischemia appear to berequired beforetheclinicalsyndromeofARF be-comes manifest. A typical example ofthe latteristhat which follows prolongedanddifficult cardiacsurgery,notwithstanding the use ofprotectiveagents (10-12). It occursin the wake of prolonged cardio-pulmonary bypass
(.180
min [13]), during which the kidneys are perfused at a low rate (-250 ml/min) and at ahydraulicpressure low enough(-50mmHg) tobring glomerular filtrationto ahalt (14).Usuallythis initiating ischemic insult isprolonged and compounded byimpaired,postoperative cardiac function (10, 13).Wehaveshownpreviouslythatonly a minority of patients with this form ofARF(21/44) exhibit recoverywithin 2 wk postinjury. Aswith theaforementioned experimentalanalogueofpostischemicARFinthe rat, recovery followed circulatory improvement,asmanifested by restoration tonormalof cardiacperformance (10).Because thephenomenonofpostischemicARFprotracted beyond2 wkhas becomeprevalent and carriesagrave
prognosis
(1
3, 15, 16),and because thereisnoanimalmodelofARFafter prolongedandpartial renalischemia,wehave attemptedto elu-cidatedirectly
thefunctionalcorrelatesof thiscommonvariant ofARF in man. To do thiswe studied 10patients
inwhom ARFafter cardiacsurgery wasprotracted beyond 14 d. We used the excretorydynamics
ofsmallfiltration markerstoexamine the roleof intraluminal tubular obstruction,and thedifferential1.Abbreviations usedinthis paper: ARF,acuterenalfailure; CRF,chronic renalfailure;
GQD,
inulin clearance;FEN.,fractional excretion ofsodium;GFR,glomerularfiltration rate;
kDi,
fractional dextranbackleak;ki,fractional backleak ofinulin;0,sievingcoefficient of theglomerular cap-illary wall for dextran; ,p,apparentsievingcoefficient for the i'th dextran basedsolelyonplasma and urine concentration measurements;OD, frac-tional clearances ofnarrowdextranfractions; PRA, plasmareninactivity; rD, radius ofthedextran;rDi,any dextranspeciesof the ith molecular radius; rn,molecularradiusofinulin;T.,time after bolusinjection
whenurinary inulin (or DTPA) excretionrateismaximal; T*, mean
residence time ofinulin/DTPAin plasma;T.,urinarydead spacemean
residencetime;UDS, urinarydead spacevolume; U/P,urine-to-plasma; V, urine flow rate; V,rateof urineflow in milliliters per minute.
J.Clin.Invest.
©The AmericanSocietyforClinical
Investigation,
Inc.0021-9738/85/10/1440/09 $1.00
clearance of filtrationprobesofgradedsize to evaluate
transtu-bular backleak of
glomerular
filtrate. Ourfindingsreveal arenal injurythat isquantitatively more severethanandqualitativelydifferent from human
postischemic
ARF of shorterduration.Methods
Patient
population
and clinicalbackground.
Usingaprotocoland consentprocedure approved bythe Stanford
University
Committeeonthe Use of HumanSubjects
inResearch, Stanford,
CA,westudied 10patients withsatisfactory premorbid
renal function whodevelopedprotracted ARFsubsequent
tosurgery of the heart andgreat vessels. There wereeight
menandtwo womenwhoranged
in age from 34to77,with amean
(±SE)
of64±4 yr. Thedevelopment
ofARF, initially
nonoliguricinall
subjects,
wasmanifestedbythe presence ofprogressive
azotemiaaccompanied
byisosthenuria,
andby
the increased fractional excretion of sodium(>1%)
andwater(urine-to-plasma
inulin concentration ratio<
20) (17).
Thesesubjects
wereselected forstudy
because ofunremitting ARFdespite
several weeksof intensive medicalandsurgical
care.Ac-cordingly,
studies of renalphysiology
wereperformed
23±4 d after theonsetof renalexcretoryfailure
(Table
I).For
comparison,
twoother groups ofsubjects
wereevaluated. Thesewere:
(1)
BriefARF group. This group included 32age-matchedpatients(63±2 yr),
21 males and 1 Ifemales,
in whomARFresolved within 2 wk. In thesesubjects,
ARFalsodevelopedaftermajor
cardiacsurgery. Studies ofrenalphysiology
wereperformed during
aperiod
ofincreasingazotemia,
on average 6±1 daftertheonset of renalinsufficiency.
(2) Stablechronicrenalfailure(CRF)
group.Thisgroup included 30patients whohad stable CRF ofdiverseetiology
(43±3yr,15males, 15females).Hemodynamic findings
weresimilarinprotracted
and brief ARF(control
group1)
populations,
asshown in Table II. Meanarterialpressureaveraged
74±3 vs.80±3 mmHg,respectively.
Mean increase inbodyweights
(comparedwith admissionweights)wereidentical,5±3vs.5±1%.Large
butsimilarpercentages ofpatientsin each groupwerereceiving vasoactivedrugsatthe time of the studies of renalphysiology.Inaddition,thecolloid osmoticpressureofplasmawas not
significantly
differentin thetwogroups, 22.1±1.0 vs. 23.3±0.5 mmHg. Measurementsof he-matocrits alsodidnotsignificantly differ,33±3vs.35±1%. Thecardiac index tendedtobe lowin controlsubjects with briefARF(2.47±0.12liters/min
perM2).
Becauseappropriatevascular catheterswere nolonger inplace
insubjects
withprotractedARF, cardiac indexcould notbe determined.Thetendencytowardalowarterialpressuredespiteavolume-expanded
stateand theadministration ofdopamine (n = 10),and inTableI.ClinicalFeaturesof10 Patientswith ProtractedARF
Day
Day dialysis Dayof Day
Patient Age/Sex ofstudy initiated recovery of death
1 65/M 15 41
2
34/M
25 1 493
64/M
16 14 294 60/M 21 26
5 77/M 35 33 46
6
49/F
46 44 477
77/F
25 8 308
68/M
47 17 539 75/M 15 12 23
10 73/M 14 14
Mean 64 23 18
±SE ±4 ±4 ±5
Table II.
Hemodynamic
Findings
inBrief
and Protracted ARF Prtracted BriefARF ARFNo.
patients
32 10 Meanarterialpressure(mmHg)
80±3 74±3Colloid osmotic pressure
(mmHg) 23.3±0.5 22.1±1.0
Increment in
body
weight (%)
5±1 5±3Hematocrit(%) 35±1 33±3
Inotropicagents (%) 87 100
After
load-reducing
agents(%) 50 20
some casesepinephrine(n = 5), suggested that they too manifesteda
low cardiac output state.
Study protocol. Patientswereexaminedduringanepisode of ARF thatwasprotracted,asjudged byfailure of recovery of renalexcretory functiondespitetwo or more weeks ofintensive medical care. All studies
werebegun24 hor moreafter the most recenthemodialysistreatment whenpatientswerehemodynamicallystable and nothypovolemic.Fluid balancewasmaintainedduringthestudy.Clearance studies were per-formedby giving asingle primingdose of inulin(60 mg/kg ofbody weight) and technetium-labeled diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid
([9'Tc]DTPA,
ImCi).Apolydispersesolution of neutral dextran 40 (Rheomacrodex,Pharmacia FineChemicals, Uppsala,Sweden, 140mg/ kg)wasthereaftergivenbyinfusionovera20-min period.Anin-dwelling Foleycatheterwasusedtocollect urinespecimens.To evaluate the ki-netics of filtration marker clearance and distribution within thebody, blood and urinespecimenswerecollectedduringthe immediate post-prime periodat 1, 3, 5, 10, 15, 30, and 60min.Thereafter, clearance studieswerecommenced with blood and urine collected each half hour for2 h and thenhourlyfor an additional 2-4 h. From these plasma and urinesamples,theurinaryclearances(C)of inulin andDTPA,the frac-tional excretion of sodium(FEN.)
and theurine-to-plasma(U/P)os-molality ratiowere determined. Clearanceswerecalculated from the ratio (UV)/(PT), where U = urinaryconcentration of the clearance
marker,V=urine flow rate, T=time ofcollection,andP = logmean
of clearance marker concentration in plasma samples bracketingthe urine collection.
[p'Tc]DTPA
wascounted in urine andplasma witha Packard gamma scintillation spectrometer(model 3002, Packard In-strumentCo., Inc.,DownersGrove, IL).The assay oftheremainingtestsolutesemployedin the presentstudyhas been described in detail
pre-viously (9, 10).Inaddition, plasmareninactivity(PRA) was determined
asthe rate ofimmunoassayableangiotensinI generated in plasma in-cubatedatpH7.4 andat370C(18).
Aftergelchromatographicseparationof plasma and urine on pre-calibratedSephacryl S-300 columns(Pharmacia FineChemicals), the fractional clearances ofnarrowdextranfractions(0D) were computed
usingtheequation
OD=
(U/P)D/(U/P)IN,
(1)where
(U/P)D
and(U/P)N
refertourine-to-midpoint
plasmaconcentra-tion ratios of dextran and
inulin,
respectively.
In thetwocontrolgroups,clearancestudieswereperformedby
ad-ministering
thepriming
dosefollowedby
aconstantinfusionof inulinresulting
inasteady
stateplasma
concentration. Afteranequilibration periodlasting
60 min, four30-mintimed urine collectionsweremade and bloodwasobtainedatthebeginning
and endof eachperiod.Clear-ances werecalculatedasreported
previously
(9-12).(inulin anddextran) from damaged tubules have been reported in detail previously(I1).In brief, we have assumed that glomerular permeability toinulin and dextran was not different between patients with protracted ARF and those with CRF in whom inulin clearance was depressed to similarlylowlevels (< 15ml/minper 1.73m2).It followsthat any elevation of6D inARFwhen compared with 0Din CRF might be due to the backleakofinulin through damaged tubules at a greater rate than backleak ofthe largerfiltered dextran molecules. The use of a population with CRF as a control group is novel. It has the advantage that even the smallestcomponent molecules in dextran 40 are retained in serum be-cause of thelow glomerular filtration rate (GFR), thus permitting for thefirst timeacomparison between the experimental and control group ofthefractionalclearanceof dextran molecules of radius below 20A.
When thepermeability properties ofthe tubule are normal, all inulin and dextrancleared by the glomerulus and appearing in the glomerular filtrate isassumed to reach thefinal urine. It is thisassumption that permits estimation ofthe dextran ultrafiltration characteristics of the glomerularcapillarywall(19). For the kidney in ARF, however, we pro-posethattubule backleak of inulin(and alsodextrans) occurs; if we furtherassumethat suchleakageis"passive"(thatis,occurs solely by ultrafiltration and/or diffusionthrough the damaged tubulewall), then the rateof leakage ofany such solute should benearlyproportionalto theconcentration ofthatsolute in theglomerularfiltrate. Under such circumstances,thefractionalbackleakof inulin(definedasthe rateof backleakdivided bytheGFR)will be constant(kjn).Preciselythe same criteriaapply to any dextranspecies oftheith molecular radius
(rDi),
leadingto afractionaldextran backleakofkDi.
However, thepermeability ofthedamagedtubule wall to dextrans would be expected to be adeclining function ofthesize ofthe dextranmolecule,kDi
=f(rDi),
(2)where
kDi
-k,.
asrD.
-r..; kD
-*0as r> -* 00.Simplemass-balance computations of inulinanddextran clearedbytheglomerulusleadtothefollowingrelationship(I1):
Oam
=O[I -kDJ/(l
-kj)= [I -f(rD)]/(l
-k1), (3) whereO.,,
is the apparentsieving coefficientforthei'th dextran based solelyonplasmaand urine concentration measurements, and ( isthe sieving coefficient oftheglomerularcapillarywallfor that dextran. Qual-itatively, we can deducefrom Eq. 3 that, for largedextran molecules wherekD;
= 0,Oapp
> e(since [I -k,,]
>0), while forsmall dextranmoleculeswhere
kDi
= ki,,O1 -p 0.Assumingthat the dextransieving characteristicsof theglomerular capillarywall inprotractedARFarethesame asthose insevereCRF,
Eq. 3 can be reduced to:
Oam/0
=(I -k)/(l -kjn)
=[1/(1-kjn)]
- [kD/l-kin)], (4) where 0 nowequalsthefractionaldextran clearance in CRF.Further,
kinis a constantforagivensubject,whereas
kD;
isafunction of ri. AsrD1-
r3,k,,- kj,andasrDi-oo,kDi
- 0.Hence,the ratio(O.pp/O)
should increase withrDifromavalueof
unity (for
smallrDi)
to alimitingvalueof1/(1-
k1.)
as rincreases.Since,as r-00,
0-*0,aplot
of(O../
0)vs.rshouldpermitareasonablyaccurateextrapolationtothelimiting
valueof
(O,./O)
-1/(1-ki,).
Thispermitscalculationofkn,,.
Sincek,
is the fraction of filtered inulin that leaksback,
correctedGFR=[l ]Cil] (5)
whereC,, denotes inulin clearance.
Measurementofthe inulinresidencetimein theurinarydead space. Aftertheintravenousadministrationof inulinorDTPA,the filtration marker distributes inplasma,inanextravascular,extracellular space and in a third volumeextendingfrom Bowman's spacetothe
urinary
bladder (theso-calledurinarydead space[20]).There isadelayin the appearance oftheinjectatein the final bladder urine(10,
20).Inulin excretion risesslowlywithtime,reachesapeak,and thendeclinesparipassuwith the
falling
plasmaconcentrationofinulin.Thetimerequired for inulin totraversethe dead space
(T.)
andthetimerequiredfor peakurinaryinulin excretiontobe observeddependupon severalfactors.Thefirstis the existence ofapoolof tubular fluid and urine knownastheurinarydead space, which consists of partorallof the volume of the renal tubules,pelves,
andureters(10,20). Largerdead space volumes (or lower tubular fluid flowrates)will result inagreaterdelayin inulin appearance andalongertimetopeakexcretion. The secondpotentialfactoraffectingboth
T.
and thetimetopeakurinary
inulin excretion is leakage ofglomerular filtrateacrossthedamagedrenal tubularepithelium.Ifpresent, backleak decreasesnet urinary clearanceofinulin and,therefore,the apparent GFRaswell. A thirdsetoffactorsaffectingT.
is therelationship ofplasma
volumetoapparent GFR and theassociatedrateof clearanceof inulinfromplasmaintothe extravascular space. Asplasmavolumein-creasesortherateof extravascularaccumulation decreases, T,, prolongs. Wehavepreviouslyanalyzedthekinetics of inulinexcretion by
de-vising
a3-compartmentmodel thatpermitsdeterminationof themeanresidence timeof inulin inplasmaandtheurinarydead space(10).In the presentstudywehavemodifiedtheearlier3-compartmentsolution toincludetheeffectsof transtubular backleakofthefilteredsolute. The modification
yields
thefollowing
formulation:(Tm..)-
=((T.)-'
-(T*)-')/(Ln[(T*/T,)]).
(6)T.,,,,,,
time after bolus injection when urinary inulin (or DTPA) excretion rateis maximal. T,,urinary dead space mean residence time whereT.
=
UDS
*V;UDs
isthe volume inmilliliters ofthedead space andVistherateof urine flowin milliliters per minute.
Tp,
meanresidence time of inulin/DTPA in plasma. It is determined by the plasma volume and by theclearances ofinulin or DTPA: (a) from plasma into the urine by glomerularfiltration; (b) from plasma into the extravascular space; and finally(c),from tubularfluid back into the vascular and extravascular spacesbytherateof backleak. During ARF, with low urinary excretion rates, T* iscalculated at longtimes after the bolus injection of inulin/ DTPA, whenplasma and extravascular spaces have equilibrated and the "'clearance" of inulin or DTPA into the extravascular space is nil. The rateofbackleakof a given solute depends upon its molecular size and theextentof increased permeability oftheinjuredtubularepithelium. Thus, T*= plasma volume/[corrected GFR- (I -ka,)].As backleak increases,neturinaryclearancediminishesand the meanplasmaresidence time rises.Therefore, thetime topeak urinary inulin excretion may becomesubstantially prolonged.Statisticalanalysis. Allresultsare expressed as mean±SEM.Data fortheexperimental andtwocontrolpopulationswere analyzed and compared with the Stat Plus General Statistical Package (Human Systems Dynamics, Northridge,CA).Anunpaired two-tailed t test or the Mann-WhitneyUtest wasusedto testthesignificanceofthedifferencesobserved. Linear regressionanalysiswasused toexamine the strength ofassociations betweenvariables.
Results
Clinical andlaboratoryfindings.Theresults of10studiesduring thecourse ofprotractedARFareshown in Table III and
com-pared with those of 32subjects havingARFof brief duration. As noted previously, episodesof ARFwere lengthyin the
ex-perimentalgroup,averaging36±4d until deathsupervenedor
recoveryoffunctionwasobserved.7of 10patientswerereceiving dialytic support. Theprofound depression in renal function is
indicatedbythe inulinclearance,whichaveragedonly 5.0±1.7,
avaluesignificantlyless than thecorrespondingvalue of14±1 ml/minper 1.73 m2observed in the brief ARFcomparison pop-ulation(controlgroup 1).5 of 10patientswithprotracted ARF
were oliguric(V. 0.3 ml/min); forall studies, urine flow
TableIII.LaboratoryFeaturesof10 Patients with ProtractedARF
C. CDTPA U/P U/P
Patient (ml/min/1.73 i2) (ml/min/1.73i2) V FEN inulin osmol
mlmin %
1 10.0 10.0 1.4 7.1 7.0 1.2
2 12.0 12.0 0.5 11.5 4.0 0.8
3 0.4 0.4 0.07 3.3 6.0 1.0
4 8.0 8.0 1.1 2.7 7.0 1.0
5 1.0 1.0 0.3 36.6 3.0 1.2
6 0 0 0.01 -
-7 1.0 1.0 0.1 1.0 8.0 1.0
8 1.0 1.0 0.2 6.3 7.0 0.9
9 2.0 2.0 0.5 3.3 6.0 1.1
10 15.0 14.0 1.4 0.9 11.0 1.2
Mean 5.0 4.9 0.6 8.1 7.0 1.0
±SE ±1.7 ±1.7 ±0.2 ±3.5 ±0.7 ±0.04
Nonoliguric ARF of brief duration(n=32)
Mean 14.0 ND* 1.9 8.0 6.0 1.05
±SE ±1.0 ND* +0.4 +2.0 ± 1.0 ±0.05
Pvalue <0.05 ND* <0.01 NS NS NS
* ND, not done.
elevated(8.1±3.5%); isosthenuriawaspresent(U/P osmolality 1.0±0.04); the urine-to-plasma inulin concentration ratio was low (7±0.7). Alloftheforegoing findingsareindicativeofsevere ARF(17). Wealsocomparedthe clearance of
[99mTc]DTPA
to that of inulin and found the clearancestobeessentiallyidentical, 5.0±1.7 vs.4.9±1.7 ml/min per 1.73 m2, respectively.MeasurementsofPRA wereavailableinnineof thepatients with prolonged ARF. All patients exhibited significant hyper-reninemiawhen compared with normal euvolemic volunteers studied in ourlaboratory(16.1±1.7 vs.0.6±0.2ng/ml per h, P
<0.001). PRA levels wereinversely related tobothurineflow rate and inulin clearance (coefficients of correlation = -0.70 and-0.83, respectively).There was also a weakerinverse
rela-100 I
10 - NORMAL
E
E Figure 1.
Urinary
inulinex-BRIEF ARF cretion(Ui.,,fnV)vs.time
curvesfor13 control
pa-1 _ _ tients withARFofbrief
du-ration (middle) and 10 ex-perimentalpatients with
/fPROTRACTED
PROTRACTED ARFARF protractedARF(bottom).
Theinulin excretion/timecurvefor normal postopera-tive subjects studied by us
0 30 60 90 120 150 previously(10)is also
TIME(min) shown for comparison (top).
tionshiptotherateofsodium excretion(coefficientofcorrelation
--0.5).
Timetopeak inulinexcretionand
T,.
Asshown in Fig.1,
meaninulin excretionratereached amaximumat - 120min
in patients with protracted ARF. In comparison, subjects with ARF of brief duration (controlgroup 1) achieved maximal ex-cretionratesmuchearlier,at I
min,
albeitathighlydifferent maximal rates commensurate with renal function. The latter value is similartothat observed byuspreviouslyinpostoperative subjects with normal renal function(10).The estimatedurinary
dead spacevolume
(UDs)
in patients with protracted ARFwassmaller than that of brief ARF controls (10±1.6 vs. 15.6±2.0 ml, P<0.05). Further insightintothe physiology of theurinary deadspace maybe obtained with the aid of the linearregression analysis depicted in Fig. 2, which demonstrates therelationship between urine flow rate V and
UDs.
Asshown,UDS
isdirectly relatedtoV(coefficient of correlation=0.7). Thus,UDsexhibits akinetic compliance. Hence, with lower urine flowrates, asin subjects with prolonged ARF,UDS
is also diminished. From the relationship in Fig. 2, itcanbe predicted that aminimaldeadspacevolume of 6 ml exists(3mlperkidney and ureter),even
with complete anuria.2
The Tu was markedly increased in subjects withprotracted ARF (80±45 min), andgreatlyexceededthatofcontrolpatients withbrief ARF (9±1
min,
P < 0.01). However, Tuis directly proportional to the volume of the urinary dead space but in-versely relatedtourineflowrate,i.e.,2.Ourfindings are in keeping with an earlier study in the dog by Bojesen (20). Hedemonstrated both kinetic compliance and a similarly small volumeof the dead space at low rates of urine flow in canine kidneys weighing 100-150 g. Bojesen (20) validated the veracity of estimates of dead space volume from the kinetics of inulin excretion by making si-multaneous direct determinations of pelvic volume over a wide range of urine flow rates.
Figure 2. Therelationship of
UDs
toV,demonstrating
kineticcompliance.
Tua(UDS)AP)
V).Since
UDS
alsodeclinesasVdecreases(Fig. 2),
anyprolongation
of T0caused
by
falling
urine flow isto somedegree abbreviatedby
thecoincident reduction in UDS.Fractional inulin
leakage.
Wehavepreviously
demonstrated the transtubular backleakof filtered inulin and dextran during ARFof brief duration(1
1,12).
InFig.
3,
the meanfractional dextran clearanceprofile for patients
withprotracted
ARF(OAF)
isplotted
asafunction of thegel
chromatographic
radiusof thedextran,
rD, in the interval 17-40 A. Forcomparison,
alsode-picted
is thefractional dextranclearanceprofile
of the 30subjects
of the second controlgroupwith stable CRF
(OCRF).
Asshown,
OARP
iS strikingly and significantly (P < 0.01) elevated above0cRF for all dextran fractions in therDinterval 17-40A. Severalpoints
deserveadditionalemphasis:
(1)
OCRF approaches
but doesnotexceed
unity
forrD
17-20A (0.96
'
0.'0.92);
(2) OCRF
forlarger
dextran fractions
(rD>
20A)
declinesmonotonically
toward zero;(3)
instriking
contrast,only
when rD> 28A
isOARF
less thanunity; (4)
when asingle patient (#3),
in whom therewasno detectable backleak is
excluded, OARF
significantly
exceedsunity
forrD= 18 A and 19 A(P
<0.05);
and(5)
forrD= 17 and 20A <rD
< 26A,
OARY
also exceedsunity, although
thedifference
failsnarrowly
toachieve statisticalsignificance.
16 20 24 28 32 36 40
DEXTRANRADIUS(A)
Figure3. Themeanfractional dextranclearanceprofilein 10patients withprotractedARF(top)iscomparedwith that of 30 controlsubjects with CRF(bottom).All resultsareexpressedasmean±SE.
From Eq. 4, it may be calculated for the experimental pop-ulation that -44%of filtered inulin emigrates from the tubular lumen(fractionalinulin leakage,
kin)
and thusfails to reach the final urine. Because of interpatient variability of fractional dex-tranclearance profiles for the protracted ARF studies, fractional inulin leakage was determined for each subject, with one excep-tion. The value ofkCn
wasthen used to correct those experimental variables affected by inulin backleak: inulin clearance,Tm.,,
andTU.
Data are showninTable IV. There was asinglesubject (#3) whoapparentlyhadno backleakdespitesevereARF.Otherwise, values forkin
varied from 0.21 to 0.66, reflecting considerable variability in the extent of increased tubular permeability, with the result that transtubular inulin leakage may differ more than threefold between individuals.Insubject6, no inulin or dextrans were detected in the final urine despite the presence of both in plasma, which could theoretically reflect an extreme backleak of100%, i.e.,kin
= 1. (In theabsenceof measurable dextran and inulinclearances, however, actual fractional backleak cannot be calculated.) For nine patients, inulin clearances corrected for backleak varied from 0.4 to 27.9 ml/min, averaging only 9.6 ml/min.Clearly,inulinbackleak cannot wholly account for the gravereductionin GFR associated with protracted ARF. In these nine subjects,the time to peak inulin excretion, when corrected for backleak, was shortened from 120 to 102min. TheTu
de-creasedfrom 33.8to20 min. Even when correctedfor transtu-bular inulin backleak, both the time to peakinulin excretion and theTu
are considerably prolonged when compared with corresponding values in the controlpopulation with brief ARF (Table IV).Fractional dextran leakage. Not only filtered inulin leaks back from the damaged tubule, however.Weresuchto be true, then afractional dextran clearanceprofile forthe ARF popu-lationverydifferentfrom that actually observed would be pre-dicted.
Fig.
4displays
thecalculatedfractionaldextran clearance(O@aculatd)
that wouldobtainifthe tubulediscriminatedperfectly
against molecules larger than inulin,sothatapproximately one-half
of
filtered inulin,but nofiltered dextran,were to escape theinjured
tubule. Thehypothetical, calculated fractional clearance profile (top curve)representsthereforeatwofold multiplication of control fractional dextran clearances (bottom curve). The fractionaldextran clearanceprofile observed for protractedARF(middle
curve) clearly differs from both the upper and lower curves:it iselevated above the lower curve butdepressed
below the upper curve because both dextran and inulin leakback,
al-thoughthe percentage of inulin lost(rinulin
= 15A)
exceeds that ofthelargerdextranmolecules.
Thedifferencebetween observed (o) andpredicted
(p)curvesreflectsfractional dextranleakage
(kD
= [p - o]/p). As shown, the difference between the twocurves varies
continuously
as rDchanges, declining
as rD in-creases.The quantities
kin
andkDi
(where
Di referstoanarbitrary
dextran fraction of radius
i)
represent the individual rates of transportof inulinand the ith dextran acrossthedamaged
tu-bularepithelial
barrier. The ratio(kDdkin)
may betaken, there-fore,as ameasureoftherelativepermeability
of theepithelium
totheithdextranwith respecttoinulin. An examination of(kD(/
kin)
for dextrans in the radius interval 17-40 A is therefore in-structive.The results of these calculationsareplotted
inFig.
5. Theaccompanying
fractional dextran clearanceprofile
of the glomerulus in CRF(OCRF,
Fig. 3)
is included forcomparison.
Relativetothe
glomerulus,
itappearsthat thedamaged
tubuleexhibits somewhat diminished
permeability
to dextrans of all20 -18 w 16 o 14 0
uj 12
4W 10
I6
4
2
8
4x
2
:
/
r=0.7
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 URINE FLOW RATE(ml/min)
1.4 1.2
z
1.0
Z4 uiz
<1< 0.6
JCJ
-iQ.0,
u
* P<O.01
** p<0.001
-0ARF e
_o ~
___ _____9_______ ___
I-0.4
-0.2
Table IV. Fractional InulinLeakageand CorrectedExperimental Variables in ProtractedARF
Cia T. T.
Patient kin Raw Corrected Raw Corrected Raw Corrected
ml/min mllmin min min min min
1 0.21 10.0 12.7 48 42 14 11
2 0.57 12.0 27.9 90 60 38 16
3 0 0.4 0.4 300 300 71 71
4 0.55 8.0 17.8 30 27 9 5
5 0.66 1.0 3.0 66 54 13 6
7 0.58 1.0 2.4 300 240 90 38
8 0.60 1.0 1.7 180 132 45 18
9 0.59 2.0 4.9 54 42 i4 6
10 0.22 15.0 19.2 30 27 10 8
Mean* 0.44 5.6 9.6 120 102 33.8 20
±SE* +0.06 ±1.7 ±3.0 ±36 ±30 ±9 ±7
Nonoliguric briefARFcontrols (n = 13)
Mean 0.46 14.0 28.0 11 9 7 6
±SE ±0.05 ±2.0 ±3.8 ±1 1 ± 1 ±1
Pvalue NS <0.01 <0.01 <0.001 <0.001 <0.01 <0.01
* n=9, because no inulin or dextran was detected in the urine ofpatient6 upto7h
after
bolusdespite adequate plasmalevels.Calculation offractional backleak for this patient wasthereforenotpossible.
molecular sizes examined, and that the permeabilitydeclines at arate (slope of the curve) which is similar to that of the glo-merular sieving curve for rD> 24 A. The relative tubular
per-meability is zero at rD>34 A, even in the presence of a severe tubularinjury. This finding provides an explanation for the ob-servationinthe rodent model of postischemicARFthatproteins ofmolecular radius .30 Acannot traversethedamagedtubular wall(3, 6).
Recoveryoffunction after protracted ARE.4ofthe 10patients with sustained ARF recovered satisfactory renal excretory ca-pacity.Allsurvived (patients 1,2, 4, and 10). The remainingsix
patients failed
torecoverrenalfunctionand eachdied.Data are summarized in Table V.Inulin clearance, though profoundly subnormal, wasnonethelessgreater in the subgroup that sub-sequently recovered(11± 1 vs. 1±0.3ml/ninper 1.73m2).The superiorrateof inulin clearancewasfurtherreflected by a lesser timetopeak inulin excretion(50±14 vs. 170±60 min).Those2.0 WCALcuLATED 1.8 -'K
DEXTRAN BACKLEAK 1.6
AtZ 1.4
a 2 1.
Figure
4.Fractional dextranZ 1.0 9AR clearanceprofileof control
LU 0.8- populationwithCRE
(bot-4W 0.
.JUQ 06 _ \
atom),
thehypothetical
pro-0.6
-filecalculated as if one-half
0.4- offiltered inulin butno
0.2 dextranleaked from the
tu-o__.,,__.,__.,__., bule(top),and observed
16 20 24 28 32 36 40 profile in subjects with
pro-DEXTRAN RADIUS (A) tractedARF(middle).
who ultimately recovered satisfactory function hadsignificantly higherurine flow rates, while those who exhibited no recovery werefrankly oliguric (1.1±0.2 vs. 0.2±0.01mI/min). Commen-suratewith the urineflow,urinary dead space volumes also dif-fered
(I6±2
vs.7±1 ml). The combination ofhigherdead space volume but greatertubularflow nevertheless resulted in a shorterTu
(18±6vs.47±13min).Patients who recovered also exhibited significantly less hyperreninemia(2.3±0.3 vs. 27.0±3.0ng/ml
perh). Thus, theextentofinjurytothenephron in ARF may represent a graded response to the degree of underlying renal ischemia. Asthe latter increases in severity and duration, the manifest injury appears to advance through a brief form of ARF (controlgroup 1)to aprotracted, but reversible injury, or ulti-mately to an irreversible renalinjury.
1.2 1.0- 0CRF
2°
0.8S
TX
U. I
'U
o
0.6->C.4- 0 U,
TUBULeARF
0.2-18 22 26 30 34 38 42 DEXTRAN RADIUS )
Figure S.Thedextransieving behaviorofthe
glomerular
capillarywall in CRF(upper curve)iscomparedwith thatcalculatedforthedam-agedtubule inARE(lowercurve).
TableV. Clinical and Biochemical Characteristics ofSubjects Who Recovered vs. Failed to Recover Renal Function after Protracted ARF
Sur- Cow
Recovery Age vived V (ml/min/1.73m2) FEN,. kin
T.
T PRAn mlmin % ml % min min ng/ml/h
Yes 4 58±7 4 1.1±0.2 11±1 5.6±2 16±2 39±8 50±14 18+6 2.3±0.3
No 6* 68±4 0 0.2±0.1 1±0.3 10.1±5 7±1 49±10 170±60 47±13 27.0±3.0
Pvalue NS <0.05 <0.01 <0.01 NS <0.05 NS <0.01 <0.05 <0.01
*
FEN,, T.o, T.,
and PRA:n=5.Discussion
Tubular obstruction. The severityofthe renal injury sustained by the subjects of thecurrent study isattestedtoby the loss of 96%ofnormal renalcapacity toclear inulin from plasma. Fur-thermore, this impairment of function persistedon averagefor
5wk,terminating either in recovery in a minority of patients
ormoreoften in the patients' demise. Compared with the results
ofprevious studies from this laboratory, both the timetopeak inulinexcretion and
T,
weremarkedly prolonged (10). Profoundoliguriawasalsomore frequently observed. These findingsare
similartothoseof themaintenance phase ofpostischemicARF inthe rodent. In keeping with themoredirectmeasurementsin therat(3-7), the prolongation of
Tu
inourpatientsmayreflectsignificant tubular obstruction. Inaprior study of nonoliguric postischemic ARF inman,inwhich measured renal impairment
was less severe and of shorter duration,
T,
was found to be normal (10). Given the demonstrated variabilityamong indi-vidualnephrons of tubularobstructionin the rodent model (4, 5),apossible explanation for this findingwastheexistenceofasmallsubpopulation of widelypatent, unobstructed tubules(10). Theexistence ofa sparsecollection of tubules having unimpeded
flowmaybeabettedbyhigher tubular fluidflowrates(signaled by nonoliguria); tubule cellularflotsam which would otherwise obstruct the tubular lumina couldbeliterallywashedaway(10). Theseverereduction in urine flowrateobservedinourpatients
withprotracted ARFmay havereflectedsluggishtubularfluid
flow. This, in turn, could have contributedto morediffuse in-tratubularobstruction, and hencetothe prolongationof both timetopeak inulin excretion and
Tu.
Thus,the threefold pro-longation ofTu
observedinthecurrentstudysuggests the absence ofcompletelypatenttubulesand thepossibilityofamuchmorehomogeneouspatternoftubularinjury.Thisfindingisnecessary,
but insufficient by itself, to validate the concept that tubular obstruction maybecome generalizedinthisprolongedvariant
ofhuman ARF.
Tubularleakage. The presenceoftranstubular backleakin ourexperimental subjectswithprotractedARF isattested toby
thefindingoffractional dextran clearances thatexceedunity,a
phenomenon not observed in controls with CRF. Fractional
dextran clearances in excess ofunity must signify that either
smallerinulin molecules leak back fromthe tubule withgreater facility than larger dextrans, orthat larger dextrans permeate theglomerularfiltermoreeasilythan thesmaller inulin molecule.
Itisdifficulttoconceiveofanycircumstanceinwhichalarger molecule couldby passive forces move more rapidly through theglomerular capillarywall thanasmaller molecule.Weinfer,
therefore,thatthe formerexplanation iscorrect and that there
is inprotracted ARF a size-dependent backleak of filtered mol-eculesto which the tubule is normally impermeable.
From Eq. 3 we calculate that
kins
the fraction offiltered inulinthat leaked back, was 0.44, a finding in good agreement with themagnitude of inulin backleak in the rat with an anal-ogous acuterenal injury (4, 6, 7). However, the calculation of ki,restsupon the assumption that the Bowman'sspace-to-plasma concentration ratio(orglomerular
sieving coefficient) of each dextranmolecule in ARF does not differ from the corresponding value in the control population (group 2). Transcapillary dextran flux into Bowman's space is governed in part by the same de-terminantsthat controlthe ultrafiltration process. GFR in ex-perimentalARF
declines primarily because of a reduction in the net transmembrane ultrafiltrationpressure(4, 8, 21), whilethis
latterquantity is elevated inCRF,inwhich GFR depression iscaused by areduction ofthe glomerular ultrafiltration coef-ficient, Kf (22). Despitethesedifferencesin thedeterminantsof GFR inthe twodisorders, theirneteffect is to lower the filtration fraction. A lowerfiltration fraction will blunt the rise in con-centration ofaretainedmacromolecule as plasma transits along theglomerular capillaries (23),thereby lowering bothdiffusiveand
convectivecomponentsof transcapillarydextran transport (19). Sincetheextent bywhichthefiltration fractionislowered inprotractedARFisunknown, the assumptionofdextransieving coefficients for the glomerulus identical to those in the CRF group (and hence ourcomputation of kin)may be in error.Ac-cordingly,
thecorrectedvaluesfortrueGFR andmeanresidence timeof inulin in the urinarydead spacein protractedARF(Table IV)should beregardedasapproximationsonly.Uncertainty
regarding
theactualvalueofkn
alsolimitsthe precision with whichtheratiokDi/kin
can be used tocharacterize thepermselectivity
ofthe damagedtubular
wallin protracted ARF. Inthiscase, moreover,it isnecessary to makean additionalassumption
that the transport of inulin through thedamaged
tubular
epithelial
barrier inprotracted
ARFis unrestricted.Only
inthis latter circumstance can the ratio
kD/kifl
beregardedun-equivocally as a
sieving
coefficient for theinjured
tubule. That inulinindeedpassesthroughthe injured
tubularbarrierinun-restricted
fashion
issuggested bytheidentity
of itsurinary
clear-ance with that ofDTPA. DTPA has a molecularweight
of 393 daltons andamolecular radius of -4 A. Inulin is heavier by tenfoldandsubstantially
larger(radius
= 15A).
Since both solutes arefreely
filtered across theglomerular capillary
wall (24),theequality
of theirurinary
clearances inthe presentstudy
suggests thattheirrespective
ratesof backleakacrosstheinjured
tubular wallare notdifferent. Thisimplies
that in ARF thereasonably accurate description ofthe size-selective
properties
of the tubular epithelial barrier. From the relationshipbetween the ratio
kD/1k,
and dextran radius we infer that theinjured
tubular wall behaves as a membrane with a rather sharp
cut-off,
displaying
almostcomplete impermeabilitytodextransof radius above 34 A. This membranesize-selectivity is inkeeping with earlierobservationsinpostischemic
rodent ARF in which neither horseradish peroxidase (r=30A)noralbumin (r = 36A) leaked backacrossthedamaged tubular wall (6,3).Thestructure intheinjuredtubular wall mostlikely to behave as aneffective barriertothe passage of macromolecules may be thetubular basement membrane.Thiscollagenousstructurehas a
composition
notunlikethat of theglomerularbasementmem-brane.
Thus,
thesimilaritybetween thepermselective properties ofthedamaged tubulein ARF and that of the glomerularcap-illary
wall(Fig.
5) could be construedaspointingto the tubular basement membrane asthe structure in protracted ARF thatultimately
prevents the egress ofdextrans of 34 A radius andlarger
from tubule fluid into the interstitium.The microdissection studiesbyOliver and his coworkers(25) of individualnephrons
from
patients
with protractedARF are inkeepingwith thispos-sibility. They
observedapatchy
detachment of necrotic tubularepithelial
cellsfrom theunderlying
tubular basementmembrane, aphenomenon
for which they coined the term tubulorrhexis. The denuded basement membrane remained intact, however,forming
acontinuous layer along the length ofthenecrotic tu-bule.Recovery offunction after ARF. In the rat, recoveryfrom
postischemic
ARFhasbeenpresaged by increasing renalblood flow(8). Presumably
restoration of their blood supply isnecessary before necrotic tubular cellscanregenerate. Becausetheability ofproximal
tubular cells to secretep-amino-hippuric
acid isprofoundly impaired during
ARF(2,
8, 9), the clearance ofp-amino-hippuric
acidcannotbe used to measure renal plasma flowinthis circumstance.Inthe absenceofanalternative, non-invasive method, we were unableto confirm the presence of renalunderperfusion
in thepresent study. That renal plasma flow inourpatients
with protractedARF flow wasseverelyde-pressed
nonetheless, is suggested by the observation ofextremehyperreninemia.
Similar elevations of active plasma reninlevelsby
20-or30-fold havebeenobserved by others during theoliguricphase
ofARF.These levelshave tendedtodeclineas earlyoli-goanuria
gives
waytothediureticphase (26,
27).It maybethat extremeelevations ofPRA(and hence the vasoconstrictoran-giotensin
II) delay recoveryfrom ARF. The findings inthosesubjects
destinedtorecoverof larger urine flowrates and greater inulin clearances coupled with less hyperreninemia arecom-patible
withthisview.Inkeeping withthefindingthat maneuvers thatsuppress therenin-angiotensin axisdo not protect uniformlyagainst subsequent
ARF(28), hyperreninemiaduringARFmay beasecondary phenomenon,anditssuppression may have im-portanceonly
infacilitating
theonsetofrecovery.We conclude that the brief and protracted forms of
ARF
describedinthepresent study represent a continuum of post-ischemic renal injury. Protracted ARF differs from the abbre-viatedinjuryin that the reductions in urine formation and inulin clearancearemore profound. Even when corrected for backleak, theGFR issubstantially lower in protracted than in brief
ARF,
10±3vs.28±4 ml/min per 1.73m2, respectively.Clearly, factors other thanbackleak mustbeinvoked to
explain
thedisparity.
More marked and diffuseintraluminal
tubularobstruction inprotracted
ARF,
with consequent reduction ofthetransmem-brane
hydraulic
pressuregradient,
may beone such factor. A greaterdecline inglomerular
perfusion
rateduetoextremesec-ondary
hyperangiotensinemia
may be another. We wishtoem-phasize,
however,
that there isatpresentnoanalogous
animal model of greatlyprotracted
ARF afterprolonged
andpartial
(and
frequently
repetitive)
ischemicrenal insults. Confirmation of thefindings
inferred fromournecessarily
indirectapproach
in humanprotracted
ARF must await thedevelopment
ofacorresponding
renalinjury
inexperimental
animals.Because of thelethal natureofprotracted
ARF in man, thedevelopment
ofan
appropriate
animal model isurgently
required.
Only
by
learning howtoattenuatethissevereformofARF in the labo-ratoryisaneffective
therapeutic
strategy for the human renalinjury
likely
to eventuate.Acknowledaments
The authors thank Mary Petersonforably preparingthemanuscript. This studywassupported bygrant 5 ROI AM29985 from the Na-tionalInstitutesofHealth.Dr.Moran'sfellowshipwassupportedjointly by the Marilyn SimpsonTrust Foundation andbytraining grantAM 07357 from the National Institutes of Health.
References
I.Swann, R. C., andJ. P.Merrill.1953. The clinical course ofacute
renal failure. Medicine (Baltimore). 32:215-292.
2.Bull, G. M.,A.M.Joeckes, andK. G. Lowe. 1950. Renal function studies inacutetubular necrosis. Clin. Sci.9:379-404.
3.Tanner, G. A., K. L. Sloan, and S. Sophasan. 1973. Effects of renalarteryocclusiononkidneyfunction in the rat.KidneyInt. 4:377-389.
4.Arendhorst, W.J.,W. F.Finn,C. W.Gottschalk,and H. K. Lucas. 1976.Micropuncture studyof acute renal failurefollowing temporary renal ischemia in therat.KidneyInt.1O(Suppl.):SI00- 105.
5. Tanner, G.A., and S. Sophasan. 1976. Kidneypressures after temporary renal arteryocclusion inthe rat. Am. J.Physiol.
230:1173-1181.
6.Donohoe, J. F., M.A.Venkatachalam,D. B. Bernard, and N. G.
Levinsky. 1978.Tubularleakage and obstruction after renalischemia: structural-functionalcorrelations.KidneyInt. 13:208-222.
7.Eisenbach, E. M., andM.Steinhausen.1973. Micropuncture studies aftertemporaryischemia ofratkidneys.
Pjluegers
Arch. Eur. J.Physiol. 343:11-25.8.Finn, W. F., and R. L. Chevalier.1979. Recoveryfrom postischemic
acuterenalfailure intherat.KidneyInt. 16:113-123.
9.Myers, B.D., C. Miller,J. Mehigan, C. Olcott, H. Golbetz,G. Derby,R. Spencer,andS. Friedman. 1984. Nature of the renalinjury
followingtotal renalischemiain man. J. Clin. Invest.73:329-341. 10.Myers,B. D., B. J.Carrie,R. R.Yee, M.Hilberman,andA.S. Michaels. 1980. Pathophysiology of hemodynamically mediated acute renalfailurein man.KidneyInt. 18:495-504.
11.Myers,B.D.,F.Chui, M. Hilberman, and A. S. Michaels. 1979. Transtubular leakage ofglomerular filtrate in human acute renalfailure. Am.J.Physiol.237:F319-F325.
12. Myers, B. D., M. Hilberman, B. J.Carrie, R. J.Spencer,and R. L.Jamison. 1982. Glomerular and tubular function in non-oliguric
acuterenalfailure.Am. J. Med. 72:642-649.
13.Hilberman,M., B. D. Myers, B. J. Carrie, G. Derby,R.L.Jamison, andE. B.Stinson. 1979. Acute renal failure following cardiacsurgery. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc.Surg.77:880-888.
14.Johnston,P. A., D. B. Bernard, J. F. Donohoe, N. S.Perrin,and N.G. Levinsky. 1979. Effect of volume expansion on hemodynamics of thehypoperfusedrat kidney. J. Clin. Invest. 64:550-558.
15.Anderson, R. J., and R. W. Schrier. 1980. Clinical spectrum of
oliguric and non-oliguric acute renal failure. In Acute Renal Failure. B. M. Brenner and J. H. Stein, editors. Churchill Livingstone, Inc., New York. 1-17.
16. Anderson, R. J., S. L. Linas, A. S.Bemns,W.L.Heinrich,T. R. Miller,P. A.Gabow, and R. W. Schrier. 1977. Non-oliguric acute renal failure.N.Engl.J.Med. 296:1134-1138.
17.Miller,T.R., R. J. Anderson, S. L.Linas,W. L.Heinrich, A. S. Berns, P. A. Gabow, and R. W.Schrier.1978.Urinarydiagnostic indices in acute renalfailure.Aprospectivestudy. Ann. Intern.Med.89:47-50. 18. Bryer-Ash, M., R. A. Ammon, and J. A. Luetscher. 1983. In-creasedinactive reninindiabetes mellitus without evidence of nephrop-athy.J.Clin.Endocrinol. Metab. 56:557-561.
19.Chang,R.L.S., C. R.Robertson,W. M.Deen, and B. M. Brenner. 1975.Permselectivity oftheglomerularcapillarywalltomacromolecules. I.Theoretical considerations. Biophys.J. 15:861-906.
20.Bojesen, E. 1954. The transportof urine in the upperurinary tract. ActaPhysiol. Scand. 32:39-62.
21. Oken,D. E. 1984. Hemodynamic basis forhumanacuterenal failure(vasomotornephropathy).Am.J.Med.76:702-7 10.
22.Hostetter,T.H.,H.G.Rennke,and B. M. Brenner. 1982. The
casefor intrarenalhypertensionin the initiation andprogressionof di-abetic and otherglomerulopathies.Am.J.Med. 72:375-380.
23.Deen, W. M.,C. R.Robertson, and B. M. Brenner. 1972. A
model ofglomerularultrafiltration in therat.Am.J.Physiol. 223:1178-1183.
24. Chervu, L. R., and M. D. Blaufox. 1982. Renal radiopharma-ceuticals-anupdate.Semin.Nucl.Med.XII(3):224-245.
25.Oliver, J.,M.MacDowell,and A.Tracy. 1951.Pathogenesisof
acuterenalfailure associated with traumatic and toxic injury. J. Clin. Invest.30:1305-1351.
26.Brown,J.J.,R. L. Gleadle, D. H. Lawson, A. F. Lever, A. L. Linton,R. F. Macadam,E.Prentice,J. I. S. Robertson, and M. Tree. 1970. Renin andacuterenalfailure: studies inman.Brit. Med. J. 1:253-258.
27.Tu,W. H. 1965. Plasma renin activity in acute tubular necrosis and other renal diseases associated with hypertension. Circulation. 31: 686-695.
28.Madias,N.E.,and J. T.Harrington. 1983. Postischemicacute