• No results found

Pushover Analysis Procedure_part2

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Pushover Analysis Procedure_part2"

Copied!
50
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

Pushover Analysis Procedure

using SAP2000

PART 2

(2)

Pushover Analysis in SAP2000:

Steps Sequence

1. Create the model.

2. Define frame hinges properties and assign them to the frame elements.

3. Define the parameters to calculate the demand for each performance level (f.e.: acceleration response spectra, ATC-40, FEMA; MRSA).

4. Define the load patterns which are needed for pushover: gravity loads and any other load acting on the structure before lateral seismic

loading.

5. Define the Non-Linear Static load cases and the Modal load case to be used for pushover analysis.

6. Run the Pushover load cases and check the results (Pushover curve). 7. Determine the target displacement by an appropriate method

(ATC-40, FEMA, other).

8. Evaluate the number and state of plastic hinges in the structure, and then check the maximum strains for the most critical hinge.

9. Change structural configuration (additional piles, modified pile layout) if needed and repeat the process.

(3)

Model Description

• Trestle 105 m length. • 7 spans 15 m length. • Bents with three steel

pipe (φ = 1.42 m) piles. • Steel box section cap

beam (H=1.20).

• 5 steel I-Wide section longitudinal beams.

• Concrete slab thickness = 0.30 m.

(4)
(5)

Discretization

(6)

soil-Mass Source Definition

• DEAD load.

• Piping load (permanently attached equipment).

• 5KPa (10% of uniform live load)

• Vehicle load (part of the crane above the deck)

• MASS_ADD_MG

(additional mass due to marine growth)

• MASS_ADD_WATER

(Hydrodynamic mass internal and external to the pile)

(7)

Marine Growth Load

• Pile diameter Dp = 1.42 m • MG thk = 0.20 m

• MG γ = 12.75 KN/m3

(8)

Hydrodynamic Added Mass

• Pile diameter Dp = 1.42 m • Water γ = 9.81 KN/m3

(9)
(10)
(11)

Pile Moment-Curvature Analysis

• Three levels of axial load: P1 = -10000 KN (max compression), P2 = -1700 KN (DEAD load), P3 = 5000 (max tension).

(12)

Pile Moment-Curvature Analysis

Determination of the bilinear M-Phi diagram for:

P = -1700 KN Angle = 0°

(13)

Pile Moment-Curvature Analysis

• Bilinear M-Phi diagram for: P = -1700 KN, Angle = 0°

Mne = 18700 KN-m Mp = 21000 KN-m Mp/Mne = 1.12 φY = 0.012 φu = 0.237 φp = φu – φY = 0.225 The same procedure should be repeated for the other two levels of axial force!

(14)
(15)
(16)

Pile Hinge Definition 3

(17)

Pile Hinge Definition 4

(18)

Pile Hinge Definition 5

(19)

Pile Hinge Definition 6

• Calculating the SF of the hinge PILE-ST52

To define the Moment-Curvature Curve of hinge PILE-ST52, it is

required to calculate the yielding curvature (SF) used by the program: SF = θy / Lp = 5.016E-3 / 1.5 = 3.344E-3

(20)

Pile Hinge Definition 7

(21)

Pile Hinge Definition 8

(22)

Pile Hinge Definition 9

• M-Phi curve definition for PILE-ST52

From bilinear M-Phi: Mp/Mne = 1.12

0.20 Mp/Mne = 0.22 φp = 0.225

SF = 3.344E-3 φp / SF = 67

Notice that only plastic curvatures over SF have to be specified in the right column. In the left column the Mp/Mne (obtained from M-Phi bilinear diagram) is assigned to point C and a 20% of that value to point D.

Due to numerical stability it is highly recommendable that line CD has a negative slope (not vertical) and line DE a positive slope (not horizontal).

(23)

Pile Hinge Definition 10

• Interaction surface definition for PILE-ST52

Automatically defined for each generated hinge.

It is only used to determine the exact yielding moment (Mne2, Mne3) and the angle of bending (tg α= Mne3 / Mne2).

(24)

1. The described procedure has to be repeated for the

definition of hinges in the cap beam and longitudinal

beam.

2. Due to the lower importance of beam hinges, they can

be defined faster by means of the “Automatic Hinges” if

the conditions for type of material and cross-section

geometry are met (See Part 1 of this guide).

3. It is very likely that in the hinge length for beams is not

the same as the total length of the frame element but a

fraction. This should be taken into account when defining

the hinge length (Lp) relative to the frame element

length. This is an important parameter for the correct

determination of the SF (yield curvature) from the yield

rotation automatically calculated by the program.

(25)

1. Sudden strength loss is not recommended (segment C-D)

2. Reduce the mesh size helps when using sudden strength

loss.

3. It is possible to define hinges along the whole frame

length (e.g.: 10 hinges spaced every tenth part of the

total length).

4. Repeat the described process for all the combinations of

bending angles and axial loads.

5. For bi-axial or asymmetrical cross-sections, define M-Phi

for intermediate bending angles (e.g.: 45°).

6. Once the plastic hinge definition is concluded (SF

calulated by the program determined), the property has

to be newly assigned to all the corresponding frames.

(26)

Parameters for ATC-40 Capacity-Spectrum

Method

Definition of response spectrum function (without scaling) for

each demand level (OLE-D1, CLE-D2, DE-D3)

(27)

Parameters for ATC-40 Capacity-Spectrum

Method

(28)

DEAD Load Case Definition

• Constitutes the starting point of pushover analysis.

• Non-linear geometric P-Delta analysis is performed for all the gravity loads present before earthquake

(29)

MODAL Load Case Definition

• The results of MODAL load case are used in the definition of the ATC-40 capacity spectrum (ADRS format) and the equivalent period required to obtain the performance point (target displacement).

• Besides, the mode shapes are used in the definition of the MODE load pattern for pushover analysis.

(30)

Pushover MODE Load Pattern

1. More critical pushover load pattern. Preferred

over uniform ACCEL load pattern.

2. Modal analysis has to be performed first.

3. The two fundamental modes with higher modal

mass participation in directions X and Y,

respectively, are selected for the definition of

MODE load pattern.

(31)

Pushover MODE Load Pattern

(32)

Pushover MODE Load Pattern

(33)

Pushover MODE Load Pattern

(34)
(35)

Pushover: Number of saved steps for

results analysis

(36)
(37)

1. Keep using the same type of geometric non-linearity (e.g.: P-Delta) through all the non-linear load case defined in the

model.

2. Start the model with as few hinges as possible. then gradually increment the number of hinges as necessary.

3. The first run may no include any type of geometric non-linearity. Then, after checking results and analysis

performance, add P-Delta and may be Large Displacements. 4. Start with modest target displacements and limited number

of steps (saved and total). The idea is always have the

possibility of first perform a quickly analysis. Afterwards the non-linear behavior could be incremented.

5. Consider more than two loading directions (or loading modes) to evaluate the structure under different loading situations.

Pushover Analysis:

(38)

Pushover Results Analysis

Pushover in Y direction (Mode 1 load pattern).

ATC-40 Capacity Spectrum display parameters.

D2 Performance Level.

(39)

Pushover Results Analysis

Pushover in Y direction (Mode 1 load pattern).

Target displacement. D2 Performance Level.

(40)

Pushover Results Analysis

Pushover in Y direction (Mode 1 load pattern).

ATC-40 Capacity Spectrum display parameters.

D3 Performance Level.

Besides the elastic period and damping ratio, the effective inelastic parameters are also displayed.

(41)

Pushover Results Analysis

Pushover in Y direction (Mode 1 load pattern).

Target displacement. D3 Performance Level.

(42)

Pushover Results Analysis

Pushover in Y direction (Mode 1 load pattern).

Load steps corresponding to target displacements.

(43)

Pushover Results Analysis

Pushover in Y direction (Mode 1 load pattern).

Identification of first hinge that yields (hinge with maximum deformations through all the pushover analysis load history.)

First plastic in-ground hinge appears in the bottom part of the pile at load step 32

(44)

Pushover Results Analysis

Pushover in Y direction (Mode 1 load pattern).

(45)

Pushover Results Analysis

Pushover in Y direction (Mode 1 load pattern).

Extract information for yielding (step 32), level D2 (step 34) and level D3 (step 49)

(46)

Pushover Results Analysis

Pushover in Y direction (Mode 1 load pattern).

Extract information for yielding (step 32), level D2 (step 34) and level D3 (step 49)

(47)

Pushover Results Analysis

Pushover in Y direction (Mode 1 load pattern).

Yield curvature calculation

My = 11085 KN.m

(48)

Pushover Results Analysis

Pushover in Y direction (Mode 1 load pattern).

(49)

Pushover Results Analysis

Pushover in Y direction (Mode 1 load pattern).

(50)

Pushover Results Analysis

Pushover in Y direction (Mode 1 load pattern).

Tensile steel strain for level D2 and D3 are smaller than Strain limits for CLE and DE performance levels, respectively. Therefore, the

seismic capacity of the piles is verified.

References

Related documents

We compared the accuracy of the new method which does not rely on genotype calling ( ˆ FST.Ev ) and of two methods based on computing population allele frequency as the sample

Lg3 activity confers multiple phenotypes: Expression of the mutant Lg3 activity in sectors confers at least four different fates in the blade: sheath-like with

Material & Methods: A prospective study of 252 isolates of non-fermenters from various clinical specimens received in the Department of Microbiology was done over a period of

This study monitored RHR, HRV, total time spent sleeping, time in bed, sleep phases, sleep efficiency and sleep consistency throughout a female competitive cross‐country season to

It will be shown in the next chapter that it was possible to verify even the complex photographic slides by passing linearly polarised light through the security mark,

In this paper, fuzzy logic based control of start-up current of a Buck-Boost Converter fed serial DC motor is examined through com- puter simulation.. In order to see the advantages