• No results found

TEXAS WOMAN S UNIVERSITY. Performance Evaluation System

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "TEXAS WOMAN S UNIVERSITY. Performance Evaluation System"

Copied!
30
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

Performance Evaluation System

TEXAS WOMAN’S

UNIVERSITY

(2)

Develop mutually established goals between

employee and supervisor.

Link individual performance to TWU’s

mission and goals.

Increase supervisor/employee

communication.

Identify specific indicators

of achievement.

(3)

Each regular staff member will be evaluated each

year.

Use approved Performance Evaluation forms

available on HR website.

Forms will eventually be “on line” for ease of data

(4)

 The Performance

Evaluation Cycle will be based on a

calendar year for budgeting

considerations.

 Start of initial cycle

will be January 1, of every year.

 The cycle will end on

December 31. January 1 begins new cycle Supervisors and Employees meet throughout the year November 1-15 Employees submit self evaluations November 15-30 Supervisors complete evaluations December 1-15 evaluations routed to Dept

Heads January 1 Evaluations

(5)

Supervisors: Track employee performance

successes and short comings.

Supervisors & Employees: Should any

problems arise concerning the employee’s

performance…discuss immediately.

(6)

S Specific

M Measurable

A Agreeable

R Realistic

T Timely

Reference

department goals

and objectives

(7)

A specific set of steps used to help

employees become more effective.

1.

Establish performance expectations.

2.

Observe performance.

3.

Document observations.

4.

Evaluate performance.

5.

Provide periodic feedback.

6.

Conduct annual performance evaluation

(8)

There are five performance evaluation forms. Each is tailored to a particular employee category and has a self evaluation form:

 Professional and Administrative Staff Performance Evaluation

Self Evaluation Form Professional and Administration

 Classified-Group A (custodians, groundskeepers and maintenance)

Self Evaluation Form Classified-Group A

 Classified-Group B (all clerical support, para-professional exempt and non-exempt)

Self Evaluation Form Classified-Group B

 Classified-Group C (Police Officers)

Self Evaluation Form Classified-Group C

 Health Care Professionals (Health Services)

(9)

The Evaluation form is

divided into two sections:

Performance Criteria

(Utilization of knowledge,

skills and abilities “KSAs”)

and

Key Objectives

(Goals,

Assignments and

Self-Development)

(10)

Examples of

Performance Criteria –

Knowledge, Skills and

Abilities

Teamwork

Interpersonal Skills

Supervision Required

Analytical Skills

Dependability and

Accountability

Planning

Judgment

Examples of Key

Objectives – Goals,

Assignments and

Self-Development

Project Planning

Implementation of

Dept. Objective

Attend Seminar on

Time Management

Assigned to Team for

Evaluation of New

Software

(11)

Enter the Key Objectives

on the Performance

Evaluation Form

These should be the

established goals

between employee and

supervisor.

There is room to enter

10 Objectives. If you

have more than 10 you

can download another

form located on the HR

website.

(12)

 Assign a weighted value to

Section I (Performance Criteria) and Section II (Goals & Objectives)

 This will determine whether

Performance Criteria or Key Objectives are more

important

 The weighted value of the

two sections must total 100%

The weighted value of the two sections must total 100%.

For Example:

•For a maintenance position;

Performance Criteria = 85% Key Objective = 15%

•For an administrative position;

Performance Criteria = 60% Key Objective = 40%

•For a management position;

Performance Criteria = 30% Key Objective = 70%

(13)

 Review each Performance Criteria and assign an

appropriate PRIORITY LEVEL SCALE

 The Priority Level indicates the importance of that particular Performance Criteria

PRIORITY LEVEL SCALE 0 – Not Applicable 1 – Normal Priority 2 – High Priority 3 – Critical Priority

Remember: this section is designed to identify strengths and

weaknesses in job related knowledge, skills and abilities

(14)

 Review each Key Objective and assign an appropriate

PRIORITY LEVEL SCALE

 The Priority Level indicates the importance of that particular Performance Criteria

PRIORITY LEVEL SCALE 0 – Not Applicable 1 – Normal Priority 2 – High Priority 3 – Critical Priority

Remember: this section should be linked to the department’s

strategic plan and job duties, detail assignments, and/or self-development initiatives

(15)

Supervisors should use the employee’s Self

Evaluation as well as their Performance

Management file as a tool to determine

ratings.

The supervisor then assigns a rating value

that best identifies the employee’s

performance during the entire evaluation

period using the Performance Criteria

(16)

There are five different

evaluations forms

Ratings entered are

dependent upon the

evaluation form used

Some forms have the

ratings listed 1-5 and

you mark the one that

you will assign

Some forms have a box

where you will actually

enter a number (rating

score of 1-5)

Group A, B, and C have the ratings listed 1-5

Professional & Admin, and Health Care Professional forms

(17)

 Assign a rating value to

each Performance Criteria and Key Objectives

(sections I & II)

 Enter comments in the

“Comments” or “Results” section

Rating Scale 1 – Unsatisfactory

2 – Improvement Needed 3 – Meets Expectations 4 – Exceeds Expectations 5 – Outstanding

*On some forms the wording may differ on the ratings but the general meaning is the same.

(18)

 After the evaluation is

completed you will need to download an Employee

Spreadsheet from the HR website

 Complete the information at the top of the spreadsheet

 Make sure to enter the number of Performance Criteria,

number of Objectives and the weighted value you assigned to both sections

(19)

 Enter the Rating scores in

the same order they are listed on the Performance Evaluation

 Enter the Priority numbers

in the same order they are listed on the Performance Evaluation

Make sure you enter the correct

rating score to the correct priority number

(20)

 Once all information on the

Employee Spreadsheet is

entered an overall rating will populate at the very bottom of the page

 This rating is based on:

weighted values, priorities and ratings

Overall Performance Evaluation Rating Outstanding

Exceeds Expectations Meets Expectations Improvement Needed Unsatisfactory

(21)

After all departmental evaluations are completed by the supervisor;

•The supervisor will forward the

completed signed evaluation forms, self-evaluation forms, employee spreadsheets and department summary spreadsheets to the next level supervisor

• The next level supervisor will sign off on

the evaluation forms

•Signed evaluation forms, self-evaluation

forms, employee spreadsheets should be sent to The Office of Human Resources

•Electronic copy of the department

summary spreadsheet should be sent to mozuna@twu.edu

Supervisor completes

Performance Evaluation Process

All completed forms are sent to next level supervisor

Next level supervisor approves, signs and forwards forms to HR

(22)

When we combine explicit goals with

performance feedback, motivation can be

appreciably increased!

 Performance is only enhanced when goals are combined with effective performance feedback. (Bandura, 1983)

(23)

If the employee is

surprised by their

performance

rating, you may

have failed to

provide adequate

feedback during

year.

(24)

A rating of “outstanding” should be given to

any employee who does

FAR MORE

than is

(25)

A performance

rating of “Exceeds

Expectations”

should be given to

any employee who

does more

than is

(26)

A performance rating of “Meets

Expectations” should be given to employees

who have

satisfied the expectations

of the

(27)

A performance rating of Improvement Needed should be given to any employee who has not satisfied the minimum

expectations of the duties

listed in the Position

(28)

A performance rating of Unsatisfactory

should be given to any employee whose

performance

was below

the requirements

of the position.

Immediate corrective

action is necessary.

(29)

 If the employee disagrees with the rating, he/she has the

right to respond to the supervisor’s ratings by attaching

written comments to the evaluation form and sending it to HR to be included in his/her personnel file.

 As always, both the employee and supervisor must sign the

completed evaluation form.

 The employee should receive a copy of the evaluation form

(30)

Texas Woman’s University

Office of Human Resources

References

Related documents

Once the supervisor has completed the Performance Evaluation discussion with the employee and clicked EVALUATION CONVERSATION COMPLETE button, the employee will be able to review

Should the numerical scoring completed by the immediate supervisor of an employee indicate exceptional performance, the evaluation detailing the exceptional performance must

Until the evaluation is completed (Direct Supervisor assessed performance, Reviewing Supervisor added comments and Staff Member agreed with final rating), the process of the

Interns should provide Quarterly Internship Student Evaluation (available for download through the Blackboard Learning System) forms to their primary internship supervisor, so these

However, University Supervisors will keep the Site and University Supervisor Evaluation form (students should make their own copies), the University Supervisor Tape Evaluation

NOTE: An evaluator is not required to supervise an employee sixty (60) days in order to develop a performance plan….but must have completed supervisor evaluation training prior

The supervisor routes the completed evaluation form including the position description and performance expectations to the employee's second level of supervision for signature.

To review the Performance Plan drafted by the supervisor, select the item for the desired employee with the description ‘Next Level Supervisor Approves Performance Plan’.. Review