• No results found

Making Aviation Safer: Results of the National Aviation Weather Program s 10-Year Goal to Reduce Weather- Related Accidents by 80 Percent

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Making Aviation Safer: Results of the National Aviation Weather Program s 10-Year Goal to Reduce Weather- Related Accidents by 80 Percent"

Copied!
20
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

Making Aviation Safer: Results of the

National Aviation Weather Program’s

10-Year Goal to Reduce

Weather-Related Accidents by 80 Percent

Jud Stailey

, Office of the Federal Coordinator for Meteorology

October 9, 2008

Friends/Partners of

Aviation Weather

(2)

Overview

Background

Mid-Course

Assessment

Final Assessment

FAR Definitions

Hazard Categories

Ten-year Trends

By Hazard Category

Way Ahead

Courtesy of Wings of Alaska Airlines © Mike Mastin

Courtesy of AOPA © AOPA

Courtesy of Southwest Airlines

Courtesy of NATA © NATA

(3)

Background

NRC –

Aviation Weather Services – A Call for Federal

Leadership and Action

– 1995

White House Commission on Aviation Safety and

Security – 1997

Goal: Reduce fatal accidents by 80% in 10 years

National Aviation Weather Program (NAWP)

Strategic

Plan

– 1997

NAWP

Initiatives

– 1999

Programs/Projects

Baseline – 2001

Update – 2003

(4)

Mid-Course Assessment - 2003

Included accident data 1996-2001

Established trends for all weather-related and

fatal weather-related accidents

Reviewed status of programs/projects in

context of accident trends

Conclusions & Recommendations

Sustaining risk reduction success in general aviation

Further analysis into impact of weather hazards on smaller commercial carriers

Reducing risk from turbulence and convection hazards

Reducing risk from high density altitude

Sustaining investment in programs/projects for near-term improvements

Sustaining investment in R&D to continue longer-term improvements

Focus areas to move forward

(5)

Final Assessment

Received final NTSB accident data

through 2006 in Spring 2008

Analysis of the full ten years using

same approach used in the

(6)

Final Assessment

Categories of aviation operations were

considered separately:

Part 91

: All aviation other than military or

commercial

Part 121

: Major passenger airlines and cargo

carriers that fly large transport-category aircraft in

revenue service

Part 135

: Scheduled passenger service in aircraft

with fewer than ten seats and nonscheduled

operations—revenue-earning flights in which the

departure time, departure location and destination

are negotiated with the customer

(7)

Final Assessment

Hazard Categories:

Restricted Visibility and Ceiling (7)

Precipitation (non-icing) (3)

Icing Conditions (4)

Turbulence and Convection (17)

Temperature and Lift (6)

En Route and Terminal Winds (4)

Electrical (2)

(8)

Accident Trends

Significant progress in meeting the

10-year accident reduction goal

RATE TRENDS

Part 91:

All

Part 121:

Part 135

Fatal

Wx-related

All causes

17% 17% 17% 63% 7% 49% 33% 30% 23% 37%

Fatal

All

All

(9)

0.00 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00 1.20 1.40 1.60 1.80 2.00

1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006

Year

Accidents per

100,000

Flight-Hours

All weather-related accidents Weather-related fatal

2006 goal = 0.08 2006 trend = 0.23 2006 goal = 0.34 2006 trend = 1.12

(10)
(11)
(12)

Part 91, Trend for Category A, Restricted Visibility and Ceiling Hazards 0.00 0.10 0.20 0.30 0.40 0.50 0.60

1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006

Year

Fatal Accidents All Accidents

2006 goal = 0.10 2006 trend = 0.21

2006 goal = 0.08 2006 trend = 0.18

Weath e r Factor Cites per 100,0 0 0 Flight-Hou rs

(13)

Part 91, Trend for Category D, Turbulence and Convection Hazards 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9

1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006

Year

Fatal Accidents All Accidents

Weather Factor Cites

per

100,000

Flight-Hours

2006 goal = 0.15 2006 trend = 0.41

2006 goal = 0.02 2006 trend = 0.05

(14)

Part 91, Trend for Category F, En Route and Terminal Winds 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9

1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006

Year

Fatal Accidents All Accidents

Weather Factor Cites

per

100,000

Flight-Hours

2006 goal = 0.16 2006 trend = 0.47

2006 goal = 0.015 2006 trend = 0.022

(15)

Part 121: Trends for all weather hazards and for turbulence & convection hazards

0.000 0.020 0.040 0.060 0.080 0.100 0.120 0.140 0.160 0.180 0.200

1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006

Year

All Turbulence and convection hazards

2006 goal = 0.025 2006 trend = 0.084

2006 goal = 0.023 2006 trend = 0.077

Weather Factor Cites

per

100,000

(16)

The Way Ahead

Continue to collect and analyze annual data

Investigate timing and potential effectiveness of

programs/projects in light of trends (including those

completed before 1997)

Consider continuing to identify and track programs/

projects

Objective:

Sustain progress to date, remove barriers to

reducing accident rates further, and provide

an effective system for NextGen transition.

(17)
(18)

NTSB Factors and Weather Categories

Restricted visibility and ceiling:

Below approach/landing mins

Clouds

Fog

Haze/smoke

Low ceiling

ObscurationWhiteout Precipitation (non-icing):RainSnowDrizzle/mist Icing conditions:

Icing conditions

Ice fog

Freezing rain

Carburetor icing

Turbulence and convection:

Turbulence (thunderstorm)

Thunderstorm

Thunderstorm outflow

Microburst (dry)

Microburst (wet)

Updraft

Downdraft

Gusts

Wind shear

Dust Devil/Whirlwind

Variable wind

Sudden wind shift

Mountain Wave

Turbulence

Turbulence, clear air

Turbulence in clouds

(19)

NTSB Factors and Weather Categories (Cont’d)

Temperature and lift:

Temperature inversion

High density altitude

Temperature, high

Temperature, low

Thermal lift

No thermal lift

En route and terminal winds:

Unfavorable wind

Crosswind

Tail wind

High wind

Electrical:

Lightning

Static discharge

Airborne solids:

Sand/dust storm

(20)

National Aviation Weather Program

Strat Plan

Initiatives

User Forum

Training

Mid-Course Assessment

Volc Ash Conference

Programs & Projects Update

References

Related documents

DhMRE shows strongly reduced metabolic capacity and underwent trans- kingdom gene transfer: its genome codes for an arsenal of eukaryotic-like putative effector proteins, with

The improvement of the thermal stability is derived from the special transport mechanism of the hole current, which reduces current gain dependence on the junction temperature.. As

Based on the information provided by an MRP/MRP II based production planning and control system we developed a linear programming model with integer variables, which determines

The patients enrolled in this study had one or more of the following factors indicating incurable cancer: liver metas- tasis, peritoneal metastasis, and/or distant lymph node

The parts of the graph model that have string properties (graphs, nodes and edges), will pass the name of the property when the value of this string property changes.}. public

It is compiled using information from weather observing sites operated by NOAA- National Weather Service / Department Of Transportation-Federal Aviation Administration

Wright Tel: 519.660.7753 Email: Charles.wright@siskinds.com Lawyers for an Ad Hoc Committee of Purchasers of the Applicant’s Securities, including the Representative

occasioned by any act or omission or negligence of Tenant, or any.. party from [sic] whom Tenant is responsible. Such indemnity shall include all costs and attorney fees incurred