• No results found

EXPERIMENTAL STUDY OF A DOMESTIC HOT WATER STORAGE TANK THERMAL BEHAVIOUR

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "EXPERIMENTAL STUDY OF A DOMESTIC HOT WATER STORAGE TANK THERMAL BEHAVIOUR"

Copied!
7
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

EXPERIMENTAL STUDY OF A DOMESTIC HOT WATER STORAGE TANK THERMAL BEHAVIOUR

S. Amara(1)* , B. Benyoucef(2), B. Nordell(3), A. Touzi(1) and A. Benmoussat(2)

(1) Unité de Recherche en Energies Renouvelables en Milieu Saharien (URER/MS)

Adrar – BP 478, Route de Reggane

(2) Unité de Recherche Matériaux et Energies Renouvelables (URMER)

Université de Tlemcen, BP 119 Tlemcen 13000,

(3) Division of Architecture and Infrastructure Renewable Energy Group

Lulea University of Technology (LTU), SE-97187 Lulea, SWEDEN

* Corresponding author. E-mail :ama_sof@yahoo.fr

Abstract

Much work has been carried out on hot water storage during the last 20-30 years, particularly on solar heat applications. Theoretical and experimental studies on the internal heat transfer have been made at laboratory scale and at larger scales. Current study, which was conducted in order to understand the stratification phenomena, involved an experimental study on the thermal behaviour in a hot water tank during charging and discharging for domestic hot water storage. Results showed no effect of stratification due to the injection fluid from the bottom of the tank and the effect of mixed convection induced by the temperature difference which created a mixture inside the tank, where the temperature was uniform across the height, and the apparition of stratification due to the fact of discharge from the bottom of the tank.

Keywords: Storage, stratification, temperature, charge, discharge, thermal behaviour

1. Introduction

Many scientists have recognized that the thermal stratification is required to obtain better performance in heat storage in solar applications. Stratification in a thermal storage tank is determined mainly by the volume of the tank, the size, location and design of fluid inlet and outlet. There are four primary factors of destratification, contributing to the loss and / or degradation of the stored energy:

(a) Heat losses with atmosphere;

(b) Heat conduction from the warm to cold layer;

(c) Vertical conduction walls of the tank with which the heat loss induced currents convectors (mixture);

(d) Mixture presented during cycles charge and discharge which is usually the main cause of destratification.

(2)

The improved performance of thermodynamic systems involves the greatest degree of stratification, which is studied by temperature field measurements and hot water storage flow rate. Knowing the movement of a fluid such as water and heat transfer in an enclosure operated by an outside system or by natural flow has been the subject of several studies both numerical and experimental.

Studies have been done on phenomena that affect the degree of thermal stratification (R. Hermansson, 1993), and the thermal behaviour of water solar heater at low flow rate. The experimental results obtained revealed the thermo-hydraulic phenomena for various phases of operation of the tank (injection of fluid at several levels, drawing, and auxiliary energy heating), (L. Kenjo, 2003).

Bouhdjar (2005) numerically studied the phenomenon in a stratified thermal storage tank to determine the thermal performance and set the most efficient compared to the efficiency of thermal storage.

Regarding the influence of inlet temperature studied through the influence of the number of Richardson, storage performance was obtained with high temperatures in the top and minimum temperatures in the bottom of tank (K. Johannes et al., 2004).

A study by Ouzzane et al. (1990), permit to understand the phenomenon of heat flow through the distribution of temperature in the sensor and the absence of stratification phenomenon. Dayan (1997) also optimized the solar home. His study showed the influence of number of nodes used to simulate the tank on the cover solar.

This study is dedicated to assess the thermal behaviour of a heat water storage tank.

2. System description

The system included all the elements provided in Fig.1. We measured the water temperature in different parts of the tank Fig.2. These temperatures were measured using 15 thermocouples (K type) connected to the recorder FLUKE HYDRA SERIES II with 20 channels. The water circulating flow rate through the system is measured by a flow meter. Secondary tank Flow meter Pump Faucet Valve anti-return TANK

(a) : Achieved system (b) : Descriptive diagram of system

Fig.1 : System

Auxiliary heater

(3)

The system consists of:

• A storage tank with a 150 liters capacity, with a coefficient of loss UA=2.75W/K, with injection of primary fluid from the bottom of the tank.

• A pump 550 Wmax.

• A tank (60 * 60 * 45cm3) 160l.

• A flow meter.

Two resistors 5KW Maximum.

To understand the thermal behaviour of the tank, we conducted three experiments (representative of the operation of hot water tanks) on a traditional tank corresponding to the two following scenarios:

• Charge of tank with an auxiliary heating (Resistance) • Charge + discharge of tank by drawing ECS.

3. Experimental results:

TEST 1: Tank charge with auxiliary heating.

With an entry temperature of 50 ± 3 ° C and a flow rate of 2.6 ± 0.1 L/min, we got the temperature profiles represented here after in Fig.3:

Fig.2 : Diagram representing the distribution of the thermocouples within the tank

Fig.3 : Evolution of temperatures in the tank for different positions at the load

0 20 40 60 80 100 120 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 Time T e m p er at u re s ( °C) T10 T8 T5 T6 T7 T9 T11 T12 T13 T14 T15 T16 T17 T18 T19

(4)

Fig.4 : Radial evolution of temperatures in the tank for different layers 0 2 0 4 0 6 0 8 0 1 0 0 1 2 0 1 5 2 0 2 5 3 0 3 5 4 0 4 5 Te m per a tur es ( °C ) T im e T 1 1 T 1 2 T 1 3 0 2 0 4 0 6 0 8 0 1 0 0 1 2 0 0 ,0 0 ,2 0 ,4 0 ,6 0 ,8 Te m per a tur es ga p (° C ) T im e T 1 1 - T 1 3 Layer 1 0 2 0 4 0 6 0 8 0 1 0 0 1 2 0 1 5 2 0 2 5 3 0 3 5 4 0 4 5 Te m per a tur es ( °C ) T im e T 1 4 T 1 5 T 1 6 0 2 0 4 0 6 0 8 0 1 0 0 1 2 0 0 ,0 0 ,2 0 ,4 0 ,6 0 ,8 1 ,0 1 ,2 1 ,4 1 ,6 1 ,8 2 ,0 Te m per a tur es ga p (° C ) T im e T 1 5 -T 1 6 Layer 2 0 2 0 4 0 6 0 8 0 1 0 0 1 2 0 1 5 2 0 2 5 3 0 3 5 4 0 4 5 Te m per a tur es ( °C ) T im e T 1 7 T 1 8 T 1 9 0 2 0 4 0 6 0 8 0 1 0 0 1 2 0 0 ,0 0 ,2 0 ,4 0 ,6 0 ,8 1 ,0 1 ,2 Te m per a tur es ga p (° C ) T im e T 1 8 - T 1 9 Layer 3 0 2 0 4 0 6 0 8 0 1 0 0 1 2 0 1 5 2 0 2 5 3 0 3 5 4 0 4 5 Te m per a tur es ( °C ) T im e T 1 0 T 8 T 9 0 2 0 4 0 6 0 8 0 1 0 0 1 2 0 0 ,0 0 ,2 0 ,4 0 ,6 0 ,8 1 ,0 1 ,2 Te m per a tur es ga p (° C ) T im e T 1 0 - T 9 Layer 4 0 2 0 4 0 6 0 8 0 1 0 0 1 2 0 1 5 2 0 2 5 3 0 3 5 4 0 4 5 Temper atures (°C) T im e T 5 T 6 T 7 0 2 0 4 0 6 0 8 0 1 0 0 1 2 0 0 , 0 0 , 1 0 , 2 0 , 3 0 , 4 0 , 5 0 , 6 0 , 7 0 , 8 T e m p e rat ur e s ga p (° C ) T im e T 7 - T 6 Layer 5

(5)

The first scenario involved injecting the fluid at the bottom of the tank. At the end of the manipulation, the temperature in the tank was nearly uniform (45 ° C) (Fig.3). We also noted that in Fig.4 and Fig.5, the radial gap was not observed except for layers 2-3 and 4 in the order of 1.7 ° C, which was due to flow inlet fluid. Regarding the axial gap (Fig.6 and Fig.7), it was about 1.5 ° C maximum whatever the distance from the axis. However, we noted the absence of stratification in the enclosure.

Fig.6 : Axial evolution of temperatures in the

tank for different layers

Fig.7 : Axial temperatures gap

0 20 40 60 80 100 120 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 T e m p e ra tur es ( °C ) Time T6 T9 T13 T15 T18 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 0,0 0,2 0,4 0,6 0,8 1,0 1,2 1,4 T e mperatures gap (°C) Time T6-T13 On the axis 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 T e mper at ur es (°C) Time T8 T5 T12 T14 T17 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 0,0 0,2 0,4 0,6 0,8 1,0 1,2 1,4 Tem pera ture s g ap (°C ) Time T5-T12

To 5 cm from the axis

0 20 40 60 80 100 120 0,0 0,2 0,4 0,6 0,8 1,0 1,2 1,4 T e mperatures gap (°C) Time T7-T11 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 T e mp erat ur es (° C) Time T10 T7 T11 T16 T19

(6)

TEST 2: Charge + discharge Inlet temperature of 40 ± 3 ° C

Drawing of 2 times 2.8 l/min for 20 minutes • The first after 145Minutes

• Then a second, after a rest of 10 minutes. The flow rate was 2.8 ± 0.1 l / min

In the latter case, we found that the temperature of the upper tank decreased 7 ° C, while lower temperatures decreased from 37 ° C to about 28 ° C in the two drawing.

4. Conclusion

The storage tanks were most commonly used in hot water storage are cylindrical form. To highlight the thermal behaviour of the system, when it is subjected to various stresses well controlled, several tests were made on the distribution of temperatures. This distribution, however, was strongly affected by the velocity field in storage that consisted of forced convection induced by the inlet and natural convection due to the heat transport between water and the walls.

We observed the dynamics regime of temperature for heating by auxiliary heater and during a drawing which showed the effect piston induced by tank filling.

The injection of fluid from the bottom of the tank and the effect of mixed convection induced by the temperature difference created a mixture inside the tank, hence the uniformity of temperature on the height. The phenomenon of stratification was never observed.

Looking ahead, it will be necessary to take account of all these phenomena in the modeling of hot water storage tank.

REFERENCES

Bouhdjar, A., (2005), Phénomène de stratification dans une cuve de stockage thermique : Etude paramétrique, Thèse de Doctorat, Université Abou Bekr Belkaid – TLEMCEN,

Dayan, M., (1997), High performance in low-flow solar domestic hot water systems, Master Thesis, University of Wisconsin-Madison.

Fig.8 : Profiles of temperatures during the

load and discharges

0 100 200 300 400 500 15 20 25 30 35 40 T e mperat ur es ( °C) Time T6 T9 T13 T15 T18

Fig.9 : Temporal evolution of temperatures

in the tank at the two discharges of ECS

0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 28 30 32 34 36 38 T e m per atu res (°C ) Height (cm)

(7)

Hermansson, R., (1993), Short term water heat storage, Doctoral Thesis, Lulea University of Technology, Johannes, K., Fraisse, G., Achard, G., Rusaouën, G., (2004), Etude de la stratification thermique dans un ballon d’eau chaude solaire, Conférence IBPSA, Toulouse, 8-9 octobre 2004.

Kenjo, L., (2003), Etude du comportement thermique d’un chauffe-eau solaire à faible débit, Thèse de Doctorat, Université de Nice – Sophia Antipolis,

Ouzzane, M., Hamid, A., Zerouki, A., (1990), Expérimental and theoretical studies on natural circulation

References

Related documents

Biofilm production by selected strains of bacteria (a) and yeasts (b) in the presence of Textus bioactiv, Textus multi dressings, and culture broth without dressing.. The figures

In the present study, we developed a simple and rapid method for the simultaneous measurement of plasma concentrations of four first-line drugs (pyrazinamide,

diallylacetic acid rather than bismuth since in one case in which analysis was performed only minute amounts of bismuth were recovered, and there was, in his opinion, ‘ ‘no

Antihypertensive therapy in hypertensive patients imme- diately post stroke may be effective and cost-effective compared with placebo from the acute hospital perspec- tive at

This study aimed to assess the prevalence of anxiety and depression and to identify their associated factors including metabolic components among people with type 2 diabetes..

Economic development in Africa has had a cyclical path with three distinct phases: P1 from 1950 (where data start) till 1972 was a period of satisfactory growth; P2 from 1973 to

Skinner’9 reported 28 cases of clinical diphtheria and virulent carriers treated with intramuscular penicillin with definite benefit.. He thought that 100,000 units per day should

However, including soy- beans twice within a 4-yr rotation decreased cotton seed yield by 16% compared to continuous cotton across the entire study period ( p < 0.05); whereas,