Nutrition status of children in Latin America
C. Corvalán,*
1M. L. Garmendia,
1J. Jones-Smith,
2C. K. Lutter,
3J. J. Miranda,
4L. S. Pedraza,
5B. M. Popkin,
6M. Ramirez-Zea,
7D. Salvo,
5,8and A. D. Stein,
91
Institute of Nutrition and Food Technology, University of Chile, Santiago, Chile;2Department of Health Services, School of Public Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA;3Pan American Health
Organization, USA;4CRONICAS Center of Excellence in Chronic Diseases, Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia, Lima, Peru;5Center for Nutrition and Health Research, National Institute of Public Health, Cuernavaca, Mexico;6Carolina Population Center, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA;7INCAP Research Center for the Prevention of Chronic Diseases (CIIPEC), Institute of Nutrition of Central America and Panama, Guatemala;8Michael and Susan Dell Center for Healthy Living, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, School of Public Health, Austin Campus, Austin, TX, USA;9Hubert Department of Global Health of the Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
Received 10 April 2017; accepted 3 May 2017
Address for correspondence: C Corvalán,
Institute of Nutrition and Food Technology,
University of Chile, El Líbano 5524, Macul,
Santiago, Chile.
E-mail: [email protected]
Summary
The prevalence of overweight and obesity is rapidly increasing among Latin American children, posing challenges for current healthcare systems and increasing the risk for a wide range of diseases. To understand the factors contributing to childhood obesity in Latin America, this paper reviews the current nutrition status and physical activity situation, the disparities between and within countries and the potential challenges for ensuring adequate nutrition and physical activity. Across the region, children face a dual burden of undernutrition and excess weight. While efforts to address undernutrition have made marked improvements, childhood obesity is on the rise as a result of diets that favour energy-dense, nutrient-poor foods and the adoption of a sedentary lifestyle. Over the last decade, changes in socioeconomic conditions, urbanization, retail foods and public transportation have all contributed to childhood obesity in the region. Additional research and research capacity are needed to address this growing epidemic, particularly with respect to designing, implementing and evaluating the impact of evidence-based obesity prevention interventions.
Keywords: childhood obesity, children, Latin America, nutrition and physical activity situation.
Introduction
Currently, more than 20% (approximately 42.5 million) of Latin American children aged 0 to 19 years are overweight or obese (1). Without substantial changes, this rate will only continue to rise unabated. Along with the growth in overweight and obesity comes an increase in concomitant non-communicable diseases such as diabetes, cardiovascular disease and some forms of cancer (2). As a result, the disabilities and mortality associated with
non-communicable diseases will start to occur earlier in adulthood (3).
This epidemic is the result of a number of socioeconomic, cultural and demographic changes that have occurred in Latin America in the last decades. Improvements in socioeconomic conditions, increases in women’s employment (4), rapid urbanization (5), the proliferation of the food retail and food services sector and increasing use of private transportation have interacted in complex ways to influence diet and physical activity patterns and
ultimately the nutrition status of children in the region. The aim of the present article is to describe the current nutrition, dietary and physical activity status of children in the region considering disparities within and between countries and barriers and facilitators that may impact present and future efforts to ensure adequate nutrition and prevent childhood overweight and obesity. This is the first of a series of papers derived from the NIH sponsored workshop: ‘Preventing Childhood Overweight and Obesity in Latin America: Linking Evidence to Policy and Practice’.
Nutrition status of children in the Latin American
region
The current nutrition situation of the region reflects the fact that most of the recent economic, cultural and demographic changes (6,7) have not impacted the population equally, resulting in a scenario where undernutrition (primarily stunting) exists alongside overweight and obesity, with micronutrient malnutrition across both conditions. In Latin America, stunting (height-for-age below 2 standard deviation [SD]) is the most common nutritional deficit in children aged 0–59 months (8), although it varies widely between countries with a prevalence as high as 48% in Guatemala and as low as 1.8% in Chile. At the same time,
overweight (weight-for-height over +2 SD) is also widespread among children under 5 years old, particularly in the Southern Cone and in Mexico (Table 1) (1,9). For older children, there is less systematic evidence, but available reports and articles mainly in adolescent girls suggest that the prevalence of overweight and obesity exceed 25% of the population in some countries (1,10,11) (Table 1). The coexistence of high prevalence of stunting and high prevalence of overweight at the national level also increases the likelihood of observing double burden at the household level, such as stunted children with overweight/obese mother (Table 2) (8). Moreover, both conditions can be present at the individual level; stunted and overweight children are observed although at low levels (Table 2) (11,12).
Within countries, nutritional disparities vary with ethnicity, the degree of urbanization (13,14) and socioeconomic status (Table 3) (15,16). Nearly 13% of the entire Latin American population and approximately 40% of the rural population are indigenous (17). However, the impact of ethnicity in the growing obesity epidemic has not been well characterized. Studies have reported differences in nutritional studies by ethnicity in Guatemala (18), Chile (19,20) and Mexico (21), among other Latin American countries, but the direction and
Table 1 Prevalence of stunting and overweight in children in Latin America (1)
Country Children<5 years Children>5 years
Year Stunting (%) Overweight (%) Year Stunting (%) Year Overweight (%)
Argentina 2005 8.2 9.9 – – – –
Barbados 2012 7.7 12.2 – – – –
Belize 2006 22.2 13.7 – – – –
Bolivia 2008 27.2 8.7 2003 24.7 – –
Brazil 2007 7.1 7.3 – – 2008–09 20.5
Chile 2014 1.8 9.3 – – 2005 31.0
Colombia 2010 12.7 4.8 2005 11.2 2010 16.7
Costa Rica 2008 5.6 8.1 – – – –
Cuba 2000 7.0 – – – – –
Dominican Republic 2013 7.1 7.6 – – – –
Ecuador 2012 25.2 7.5 2012 19.1 2012 26.0
El Salvador 2014 14.0 6.0 2003 28.7 – –
Guatemala 2009 48.0 4.9 – – – –
Guyana 2014 12.0 5.3 – – – –
Haiti 2012 21.9 3.6 2005 6.5 – –
Honduras 2012 22.7 5.2 2005 25.0 – –
Jamaica 2012 5.7 7.8 – – – –
Mexico 2012 13.6 9.0 – – 2012 43.9
Nicaragua 2006 23.0 6.2 2001 19.7 – –
Panama 2008 19.1 – – – –
Paraguay 2012 10.9 11.7 – – – –
Peru 2013 18.4 7.2 2004–2008 32.1 – –
Suriname 2010 8.8 4.0 – – – –
Trinidad and Tobago 2000 5.3 4.9 – – – –
Uruguay 2011 10.7 7.2 – – – –
magnitude of the associations vary across studies. Urban– rural differences on overweight and obesity prevalence have also been described using representative data of children under 5 years of age (Table 3). The data show that in some countries in the region, such as Honduras and Peru, urban areas experience a higher prevalence of overweight and obesity compared with rural areas; similar results have been described for girls 10–19 years old (10). However, in other countries, such as Bolivia and Nicaragua, the opposite is true; with boys from rural areas having the highest prevalence rates. The prevalence of overweight and obesity also differs by maternal education. In most countries, preschool children with mothers with higher education have higher prevalence of overweight and obesity (Table 3); however, there are recent reports that suggest a shift to the poor at least in adults from low-middle income countries with higher economic growth (15,22,23). Overall, these results highlight the complexity and the diversity of each country’s local context and thus, the need of better understanding these realities when defining evidence-based interventions to improve nutrition in the region (24,25).
The nutrition transition
Dietary changes
One of the main drivers of the current obesity epidemic among children in Latin America is the rapid dietary change over the last few decades, commonly referred to as the nutrition transition (26). Information on children’s dietary changes is limited; however, based on the relationship between parent and child food consumption habits, we are able to extrapolate from adult data findings (27). Across Latin America, intake of energy, fat and protein has increased substantially over the last few decades (28–31).
For example, in Guatemala, Chile, Mexico and Brazil, the consumption of animal products and sugar-sweetened beverages (SSB) has increased, while the intake of nutrient-rich vegetables and legumes has decreased. The result of these changes is a diet high in fat and sugar but low in micronutrients like vitamin A and zinc, which is associated with increased risk for infection and compromised immune system (32).
Without substantial intervention, sales of SSB and processed foods are only expected to continue rising across most countries in the region (Figs. 1 and 2) (33,34). Three of the world’s top five SSB consuming nations are in Latin America, and the region as a whole is experiencing increasing levels of SSB intake (34). SSB have been linked to increased childhood obesity risk (35–37). Recent data from Mexico show that for children aged 1 to 19 years, SSB represent 17.5% of their total daily energy intake; an increase of at least 45.3 Kcal per day, which is equivalent to an excess 2.5 pounds per month, between 1999 and 2012 (38–40). Similarly, sales of energy-dense, nutrient-poor foods such as snacks, SSB and frozen ready-to-heat foods have steadily increased since 1998 in many countries in the region (41). In Brazil, these foods have become an increasingly important part of the food expenditure (42,43) that rose approximately 40% between 1990 and 2010 and now constitute approximately 25% of total calorie intake (41). Similarly, in Chile, increased food expenditure in SSB, ready-to-eat meals and eating outside of the home has increased over the last years (Fig. 2) (43). In Guatemala, a 10 percentage point increase in the share of household expenditures on these food products was associated with an increase in body mass index (BMI) of family members 10 years old and older by 4.25%, suggesting that consumption of these foods is a major risk factor for obesity. Therefore, halting consumption of these foods should be a target for intervention strategies (44).
Table 2 Prevalence of dual burden of malnutrition in the Latin America region (8)
Country Year Household level (Stunted child <5 years1and mother excess weight2)
Individual level children prevalence of double burden (%)
Prevalence of double burden (%) Age range (years) Type of double burden Prevalence of double burden (%)
Brazil 2006–07 2.7 5–11 Overweight3 1.0
Colombia 2010 5.1 5–12 Overweight4 0.1
Ecuador 2012 13.1 5–11 Overweight4 2.8
Guatemala 2008 20.0 (overall) <5 Overweight5 1.2 (overall)
28.2 (indigenous) 2.8 (indigenous)
México 2012 8.4 5–11 Overweight3 1.0
Uruguay 2004 6.3 6 Overweight4 1.9
Changes in food environment
Dietary changes observed in Latin America are the result of a series of changes in the global, national and local food environments that affect availability, accessibility and affordability of foods, as well as people’s food demands through higher exposure to advertisement and marketing (45).
Global food environment
Several studies have examined the association between economic globalization and the types of foods and food outlets available in local environments. Trade liberalizations between the USA and Latin America since the 1990s have increased the ease with which multinational companies can export foods (46,47). Compared to the 30 years prior to the North American Free Trade Agreement, the amount of corn, meats (beef/veal, chicken and pork), soybeans, sugars and snack foods exported from the USA to Mexico has increased importantly (48). Trade liberalization is hypothesized to have played a key role in the expansion of supermarkets throughout Latin America (49). Better understanding of how trade and investment agreements impact diets in the region may result critical for ensuring healthy food environments and improving population’s nutrition.
National food environment
Supermarkets tend to provide more packaged, ready-to-eat or ready-to-heat foods manufactured by multinational food corporations as opposed to traditional open-air markets. In-store audits have revealed that the foods occupying most of the space in these stores were cookies, SSB, potato chips and canned foods; these foods also tended to be prominently displayed (50). This change in the retail sales of food has been a major driver in shifting the diets of Latin American populations (51). Between 1990 and 2000, supermarkets in Latin America went from occupying 10–20% of the retail share to 50–60%. In most Latin American countries, multinational supermarkets now comprise 60–80% of the top five chains in each country (49) and their growth continues, particularly with their penetration into villages (52). For example, one group looked at the change in retail and subsistence food environments over 15 years in Maycoba, a rural town in Sonora, Mexico, with approximately 1,100 people, many of whom are of indigenous Pima Indian descent (53). Results found that the number of small grocery stores increased from 6 to 11. Moreover, the presence of multinational fast-food chains has grown exponentially in Latin America. In 1995, the region had 100 McDonald’s; by 2014, this had increased to 2,268 (54,55). Fast-food consumption has been linked to higher energy consumption and poorer diet quality in US children and adolescents (56).
Neighbourhood food environment
It is believed that community food environments influence dietary behaviours (57); however, the exact mechanisms and strength of the associations remain controversial given the difficulty in standardizing study designs, data collection methods and statistical analyses (58). In Guatemala (59), shopping at a supermarket is associated with increased consumption of pastries, chocolates and ice cream and decreased consumption of corn and beans, particularly in poor households (59). These results are in line with studies carried out in the USA (60,61) and other developed countries (62). However, in developing countries, evidence of the net effect of the local food retail environment on people’s nutritional status remains controversial (63–65).
In the case of Latin America, developing adequate measurement tools to assess the retail food environment requires the consideration of open-air markets (66) as they are highly prevalent in the region (67).
School food environment
In Brazil, public schools have higher proximity to stores that sell energy-dense, nutrient-poor products than natural foods (68). With some exceptions, studies indicate that higher proximity and density of fast-food and grocery stores to schools are linked to more fast-food purchases (69) and poorer-dietary scores in adolescents (70). However, this finding is not consistent across the research landscape (71,72). In addition, street-food vending is a common
Figure 1 Trends in sales of processed beverages in Latin American countries, Euromonitor 1999–2013. Source: Euromonitor International. [Colour figure can be viewed at wileyonlinelibrary.com]
practice in Latin America (73). Recently, a study conducted in 60 schools in two of Mexico’s major cities showed that there were on average six mobile food vendors around public schools and that the number of mobile food vendors around schools was positively associated with the children’s BMI (74).
There is also strong evidence that the in-school environment shapes diets and therefore, the nutritional status among children (75,76). Recently, a representative sample of Brazilian adolescents showed that availability of energy-dense, nutrient-poor foods, such as SSB and salty snacks inside the schools was associated with higher consumption of these food products (77). In Mexico, it has been also described that the number of stores inside of schools is positively associated with higher BMIs among school children (74).
Food marketing exposure to children
Advertising has been shown to strongly influence consumer choices and likely plays a role in changing diets in Latin America (78–80). It has been previously reported that in Mexico, where approximately 95% of homes have a television, the food group most frequently advertised is SSB (24.6%), followed by chocolate and confectionery sugar (19.7%), cakes, sweet biscuits and pastries (12.0%), savoury snacks (9.3%), breakfast cereals (7.1%), ready-to-eat food (6.4%) and dairy products (6.0%) (81). In addition to television advertising, food companies use the licenced television characters on their packaging to promote their products to children. In Guatemala, a study shows that children prefer the taste of food from packages with a licenced character compared with the same food in packages without the character (82). In several countries, advertising energy-dense, nutrient-poor food products is not only allowed but also highly prevalent in stores within walking distance of schools and kiosks inside schools (83–85).
Physical activity changes
Physical activity levels have decreased worldwide likely because of the adoption of a sedentary lifestyle (86). A number of physical activity factors have contributed to the global epidemic of obesity, namely, (i) reduced walking for transportation as a result of improved access to motorized transportation; (ii) decreased occupational physical activity due to automated processes, leading to more sedentary occupation patterns; and (iii) increased time spent in sedentary leisure activities (45–47,50,86–91). It is difficult to describe children’s physical activity status because few countries have established surveillance systems to assess population-level, physical activity using representative samples and consistent measures, and the ones that do are targeted to adults (92,93).
Physical inactivity and sedentary behaviour in Latin
America
Given the cost associated with using objective measures like accelerometers and the lack of research in this field in most Latin American countries (94), the prevalence of physical inactivity among children in the region remains not well known. However, findings pertaining to adults and older adolescents indicate that Latin America is the most inactive region in the world with 43% of those over 15 years old categorized as inactive (92). In almost all countries of the region, at least a third of the population over 15 years old is physically inactive except in Guatemala (16.2%) and Dominica (24.4%) (92). Recently, the Active Healthy Kids Canada Report Card on Physical Activity for Children and Youth was replicated in 14 countries, including Colombia and Mexico (95). In Mexico, it was reported that 41% of children and young adolescents 10 to 14 years old participated in at least one organized sport during the previous year and 66% walked to school (96). In Colombia, only 6.1% of preschool and school-aged children, 3 to 12 years old, received physical education classes from a professional instructor (97). Television viewing has been commonly used as a proxy measure for sedentary behaviour among children (98). Studies in Latin America suggest that the mean television watching time is 3 to 4 h per day, with the majority of children in the region spending more than 2 h per day in front of the television. In almost all countries, there is a significant association between television viewing time and childhood obesity (99–101).
Changes in physical activity environment
National physical activity environment
Additionally, technological trends are influencing physical activity behaviours (91,105–107). Increasingly, new technologies that encourage sedentary leisure, like tablets, smartphones and internet-connected video game systems, are becoming ubiquitous. Latin America has seen a strong increase in technology sales in the last few years (108). However, the widespread availability of these technologies in Latin America also makes them a potential vehicle to deliver interventions to promote physical activity and healthy diets, particularly among adolescents (109). A recent study demonstrated that while one mobile health technology with advice for lifestyle improvements did not reduce blood pressure, it successfully promoted a small reduction of weight and improved some dietary habits in individuals with prehypertension living in low-resource urban settings in Argentina, Peru and Guatemala (110). Although evidence is currently limited, the recent popularity of interactive games that encourage physical activity, like Pokémon Go, could present opportunities to use technology to improve health; although sustaining effects in the long term may be an issue (111).
Neighbourhood physical activity environment
There is significant evidence from HIC linking physical activity with the built and social environments but relatively few studies from Latin America particularly among children (93,94,112). The findings from HIC suggest that the relationship between physical activity and the built environment may be context specific. For instance, evidence from these countries shows positive associations between mixed land-use, residential density and street connectivity (i.e. US-based walkability index), and physical activity (113). Yet in Latin America and other low- and middle-income countries, findings have been inconclusive (94,114,115). Studies from Brazil, Colombia, and Mexico, have identified key environmental constructs that relate to activity levels among Latin Americans, such as aesthetics, public spaces for activity, social cohesion and safety (116,117). Some very successful and innovative programmes to promote physical activity have emerged from Latin America, such as Ciclovias, the open-street programmes, in Colombia (118) andAcademia da Saude, a national programme that offers physical activity classes, nutrition counselling, among other activities (119). These programmes have been extensively evaluated, and findings show that they have a positive impact on the activity levels of children, adults and seniors (118,120–123).
School physical activity environment
Evidence of the impact of school environment on physical activity levels is also scarce in Latin America and other low- and middle-income countries. However, from evidence of the USA, we know that most of vigorous physical activity as well as sedentary behaviours are concentrated in the
school environment (124,125). The ease of walking and biking on a campus has been related to US college students’ walking behaviour and BMI (126); Higher vigorous physical activity in the schools is associated with higher daily vigorous activity suggesting that increasing school-based physical activity could be an effective intervention for increasing overall physical activity in youth (127). A recent systematic review has shown that school-based interventions that are based on mandatory physical activity are the ones more likely to increase moderate to vigorous physical activity in youth (i.e. 23 min per day that corresponds to almost 40% of the WHO physical activity recommendation for this age group), although other less intensive actions also result in significant increases of moderate to vigorous physical activity: classroom activity breaks (19 min); afterschool activity programmes (10 min); standardized physical education curricula (6 min more than traditional physical education); modified playgrounds (6 min); and modified recess (5 min more than traditional recess) (128). A review that included information of five school-based physical education programmes from Latin America (Brazil, Chile and US/Mexico border) shows that different types of interventions have the potential of increasing physical activity levels during physical activity classes and active transportation to schools (129).
Challenges of addressing the childhood obesity
epidemic
Paediatric healthcare systems are stressed by this new nutritional scenario, where overweight as well as its associated consequences are increasingly observed at progressively younger ages (130). Healthcare systems–from both the human and infrastructure perspectives –need to rapidly adapt to prevent, identify and treat new conditions associated with overweight and obesity (131) forcing already frail public health structures to respond to complicated childhood health concerns. Existing monitoring systems, traditionally focused on monitoring weight as a way of tracking underweight (weight-for-age below 2 SD), must adapt to incorporate length and height measurements if excess weight is to be adequately monitored. Failure to incorporate length to monitoring systems may result in unintendedly missing the increasing rates of overweight, which is a measure of weight-for-height (132).
address nutrition status at both ends of the spectrum–from undernutrition to overweight–at the individual, household and societal levels (24,136). Presently, in some countries, there are efforts to address the growing obesity epidemic by modifying social and nutrition programmes or improving public school environments in general (137,138). However, in other countries such as Guatemala and Peru, social programmes are still mainly oriented to fighting undernutrition (138,139).
Culturally appropriated, local evidence that considers the particularities of the food and physical activity environment of the region is needed to define effective preventive actions to address the growing obesity epidemic. Unique subpopulation consideration must also be included, especially in Latin America, where nearly 13% of the entire Latin American population is indigenous, a population with known nutritional differences (15–17,19,20). Presently, several large-scale actions such as the taxation of SSB, use of front-of-package warning messages, marketing regulations and so on are taking place in the region (118,140–144); however, rigorous evaluations are needed to assess their impact and guide adjustments or additions to maximize their effectiveness.
Conclusion
In Latin America, there is a coexistence of undernutrition and overweight among children that importantly differ between and within countries. Rapid urbanization combined with greater penetration of the retail food and food service sector has promoted diets that rely on energy-dense, nutrient-poor foods. At the same time, sedentary behaviours have become the norm among children. If no action is taken, the rates of overweight and obese children will continue to rise. As explored in subsequent articles in this supplement, a new research agenda accompanied by strengthened translation of the research into policy and practice and increased research capacity are needed in the region to confront this growing epidemic.
Conflict of interest statement
The Fogarty International Center at the US National Institutes of Health sponsored travel for each, non-local author to attend the ‘Preventing Childhood Overweight and Obesity in Latin America: Linking Evidence to Policy and Practice’workshop, the precursor for this article. The following authors declare a further conflict of interest as specified in their ICMJE disclosure: Camila Corvalán, Chessa K Lutter, Barry M. Popkin, Manuel Ramirez-Zea, Deborah Salvo and Aryeh D Stein.
Acknowledgements
The ‘Preventing Childhood Overweight and Obesity in Latin America: Linking Evidence to Policy and Practice’ workshop and the publication of its proceedings were supported by the US National Institutes of Health Fogarty International Center.
References
1. Rivera JA, de Cossio TG, Pedraza LS, Aburto TC, Sanchez TG, Martorell R. Childhood and adolescent overweight and obesity in
Latin America: a systematic review.Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol
2014;2(4): 321–332.
2. Nishida C, Uauy R, Kumanyika S, Shetty P. The joint WHO/FAO expert consultation on diet, nutrition and the prevention of chronic diseases: process, product and policy
implications.Public Health Nutr2004;7(1A): 245–250.
3. Lobstein T, Baur L, Uauy R, TaskForce IIO. Obesity in children
and young people: a crisis in public health. Obes Rev 2004;
5(Suppl 1): 4–104.
4. United Nations, Economic Commision for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC). Economic and Social Panorama of the Community of Latin American and Caribbean States, 2014. Santiago, Chile; 2015.
5. United Nations. World urbanization prospects: the 2011 revision, data tables and highlights. New York; 2013.
6. Saad P. Demographic trends in Latin American and the Caribbean: United Nations, Centro Latino Americano y Caribeño de Demografía; 2009.
7. Rivera JA, Barquera S, Gonzalez-Cossio T, Olaiz G, Sepulveda J. Nutrition transition in Mexico and in other Latin American
countries.Nutr Rev2004;62(7 Pt 2): S149–S157.
8. Rivera JA, Pedraza LS, Martorell R, Gil A. Introduction to the double burden of undernutrition and excess weight in Latin
America.Am J Clin Nutr2014;100(6): 1613S–1616S.
9. UNICEF. UNICEF data: monitoring the situation of children and women. 2014.
10. Pan American Health Organization. Underweight, short stature and overweight in adolescents and young women in Latin America and the Caribbean. Washington D.C: Pan American Health Organization.
11. Jaacks LM, Slining MM, Popkin BM. Recent trends in the prevalence of under- and overweight among adolescent girls in
low- and middle-income countries. Pediatr Obes 2015; 10(6):
428–435.
12. Sawaya AL, Roberts S. Stunting and future risk of obesity:
principal physiological mechanisms.Cad Saude Publica2003;19
(Suppl 1): S21–S28.
13. Neuman M, Kawachi I, Gortmaker S, Subramanian SV. Urban-rural differences in BMI in low- and middle-income
countries: the role of socioeconomic status.Am J Clin Nutr2013;
97(2): 428–436.
14. Jaacks LM, Slining MM, Popkin BM. Recent underweight and
overweight trends by rural–urban residence among women in
low-and middle-income countries. Journal of Nutrition 2015; 145:
352–357.
15. Jones-Smith JC, Gordon-Larsen P, Siddiqi A, Popkin BM. Is the burden of overweight shifting to the poor across the globe? Time trends among women in 39 low- and middle-income
countries (1991–2008). Int J Obes (Lond) 2012; 36(8):
16. Jones-Smith JC. Commentary: jumping the gun or asleep at the
switch: is there a middle ground? Int J Epidemiol2013;42(5):
1435–1437.
17. International Work Group for Indigenous Affairs (IWGIA).
Indigenous peoples in Latin America–a general overview. In; 2016.
18. Ramirez-Zea M, Kroker-Lobos MF, Close-Fernandez R, Kanter R. The double burden of malnutrition in indigenous and
nonindigenous Guatemalan populations. Am J Clin Nutr 2014;
100(6): 1644S–1651S.
19. Amigo H, Bustos P, Muzzo S, Alarcón AM, Muñoz S. Age of menarche and nutritional status of indigenous and non-indigenous
adolescents in the Araucanía Region of Chile. Ann Hum Biol
2010;37(4): 554–561.
20. Bustos P, Muñoz S, Vargas C, Amigo H. Poverty and indigenous origin as risk factors of nutritional problems among
children who enroll in school. Salud Publica Mex 2009;51(3):
187–193.
21. Stoddard P, Handley MA, Vargas Bustamante A, Schillinger D. The influence of indigenous status and community indigenous composition on obesity and diabetes among Mexican adults.
Soc Sci Med2011;73(11): 1635–1643.
22. Jones-Smith JC, Gordon-Larsen P, Siddiqi A, Popkin BM. Cross-national comparisons of time trends in overweight inequality by socioeconomic status among women using repeated
cross-sectional surveys from 37 developing countries, 1989–2007.Am J
Epidemiol2011;173(6): 667–675.
23. Quezada AD, Lozada-Tequeanes AL. Time trends and sex differences in associations between socioeconomic status indicators
and overweight-obesity in Mexico (2006–2012). BMC Public
Health2015;15: 1244.
24. Urke HB, Mittelmark MB, Valdivia M. Trends in stunting and overweight in Peruvian pre-schoolers from 1991 to 2011: findings
from the Demographic and Health Surveys.Public Health Nutr
2014;17(11): 2407–2418.
25. Loret de Mola C, Quispe R, Valle GA, Poterico JA. Nutritional transition in children under five years and women of reproductive
age: a 15-years trend analysis in Peru. PLoS One 2014; 9(3)
e92550.
26. Popkin BM. The nutrition transition in low-income countries:
an emerging crisis.Nutr Rev1994;52(9): 285–298.
27. Robinson LN, Rollo ME, Watson J, Burrows TL, Collins CE. Relationships between dietary intakes of children and their
parents: a cross-sectional, secondary analysis of families
participating in the Family Diet Quality Study.J Hum Nutr Diet
2015;28(5): 443–451.
28. Grünberger K. Estimating food consumption patterns by reconciling food balance sheets and household budget surveys. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations; 2014.
29. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. FAOSTAT, retrieved on 19 July 2016. http://www.fao.org/faostat/ en/#data/FBS
30. Silberman M, Moreno-Altamirano L, Hernández-Montoya D, Capraro S, García-García JJ, Soto-Estrada G. Dietary patterns, overweight and obesity from 1961 to 2011 in the socioeconomic and
political context of Argentina.Int J Food Sci Nutr2016;68(1): 1–13.
31. Moreno-Altamirano L, Hernández-Montoya D, Silberman M
et al. The nutrition transition and the double burden of
malnutrition: changes in dietary patterns 1961–2009 in the
Mexican socioeconomic context. Arch Latinoam Nutr 2014;
64(4): 231–240.
32. Carvalho CA, Fonsêca PC, Priore SE, Franceschini SC, Novaes JF. Food consumption and nutritional adequacy in Brazilian children:
a systematic review.Rev Paul Pediatr2015;33(2): 211–221.
33. International E. Soft drinks in Latin America: keeping a global bright spot bright. London: Euromonitor International; 2014. 34. Popkin BM, Hawkes C. Sweetening of the global diet,
particularly beverages: patterns, trends, and policy responses.The
Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology2015.
35. de Ruyter JC, Olthof MR, Seidell JC, Katan MB. A trial of sugar-free or sugar-sweetened beverages and body weight in
children. New England Journal of Medicine 2012; 367(15):
1397–1406.
36. Ebbeling CB, Feldman HA, Chomitz VRet al.A randomized
trial of sugar-sweetened beverages and adolescent body weight.
New England Journal of Medicine2012;367(15): 1407–1416.
37. Qi Q, Chu AY, Kang JHet al.Sugar-sweetened beverages and
genetic risk of obesity.New England Journal of Medicine2012;
367(15): 1387–1396.
38. Barquera S, Campirano F, Bonvecchio A, Hernandez-Barrera L, Rivera JA, Popkin BM. Caloric beverage consumption
patterns in Mexican children. Nutr, J. 2010;9(47): 1475–2891
Electronic.
39. Barquera S, Hernandez-Barrera L, Tolentino MLet al.Energy
intake from beverages is increasing among Mexican adolescents
and adults.J. Nutr.2008;138(12): 1541–6100 Electronic.
40. Stern D, Piernas C, Barquera S, Rivera JA, Popkin BM. Caloric beverages were major sources of energy among children and adults
in Mexico, 1999–2012.J Nutr2014;144(6): 949–956.
41. Monteiro CA, Moubarac JC, Cannon G, Ng SW, Popkin B. Ultra-processed products are becoming dominant in the global food
system.Obesity reviews2013;14(S2): 21–28.
42. Canella DS, Levy RB, Martins APet al.Ultra-processed food
products and obesity in Brazilian households (2008–2009).PLoS
One2014;9(3) e92752.
43. Crovetto M, Uauy R. Changes in processed food expenditure in the population of Metropolitan Santiago in the last twenty years.
Rev Med Chil2012;140(3): 305–312.
44. Asfaw A. Does consumption of processed foods explain disparities in the body weight of individuals? The case of
Guatemala.Health Econ.2011;20(2): 184–195.
45. Swinburn B, Vandevijvere S, Kraak Vet al.Monitoring and
benchmarking government policies and actions to improve the healthiness of food environments: a proposed Government Healthy
Food Environment Policy Index. Obes Rev 2013; 14(Suppl 1):
24–37.
46. Popkin BM. The world is fat–the fads, trends, policies, and
products that are fattening the human race. Avery-Penguin Group: New York, 2008.
47. Popkin BM. Technology, transport, globalization and the
nutrition transition.Food Policy2006;31: 554–569.
48. Clark SE, Hawkes C, Murphy SM, Hansen-Kuhn KA, Wallinga D. Exporting obesity: US farm and trade policy and the transformation of the Mexican consumer food environment.
International journal of occupational and environmental health
2012;18(1): 53–64.
49. Reardon TA, Berdegué JA, Farrington J. Supermarkets and farming in Latin America: pointing directions for elsewhere?: Overseas Development Institute; 2002.
50. Jacoby E. The obesity epidemic in the Americas: making
healthy choices the easiest choices. Rev Panam Salud Publica
2004;15(4): 278–284.
51. Popkin BM. Nutrition, agriculture and the global food system
in low and middle income countries. Food Policy 2014; 47:
91–96.
52. Reardon T, Timmer CP. The economics of the food system
revolution. Annual Review of Resource Economics 2012; 4(1):
53. Chaudhari L, Begay R, Schulz L. Fifteen years of change in the food environment in a rural Mexican community: the Maycoba
project.Rural and remote health2013: 13(2404).
54. Kennedy G, Nantel G, Shetty P. Globalization of food systems in developing countries: impact on food security and nutrition. 2004.
55. Statista. Number of McDonald’s restaurants in Latin America
in 2014, by country. In; 2015.
56. Powell LM, Nguyen BT. Fast-food and full-service restaurant consumption among children and adolescents: effect on energy,
beverage, and nutrient intake.JAMA Pediatr2013;167(1): 14–20.
57. Giskes K, van Lenthe F, Avendano-Pabon M, Brug J. A systematic review of environmental factors and obesogenic dietary intakes among adults: are we getting closer to understanding
obesogenic environments?Obes Rev2011;12(5): e95–e106.
58. Ni Mhurchu C, Vandevijvere S, Waterlander W et al.
Monitoring the availability of healthy and unhealthy foods and non-alcoholic beverages in community and consumer retail food
environments globally.Obes Rev2013;14(Suppl 1): 108–119.
59. Asfaw A. Does supermarket purchase affect the dietary
practices of households? Some empirical evidence from
Guatemala.Development Policy Review2008;26(2): 227–243.
60. Drewnowski A, Rehm CD. Energy intakes of US children and adults by food purchase location and by specific food source.
Nutr J2013;12: 59.
61. Drewnowski A, Rehm CD. Consumption of added sugars among US children and adults by food purchase location and food
source.Am J Clin Nutr2014;100(3): 901–907.
62. Howard Wilsher S, Harrison F, Yamoah F, Fearne A, Jones A. The relationship between unhealthy food sales, socio-economic deprivation and childhood weight status: results of a cross-sectional
study in England.Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act2016;13: 21.
63. Kimenju SC, Rischke R, Klasen S, Qaim M. Do supermarkets
contribute to the obesity pandemic in developing countries?Public
Health Nutr2015;18(17): 3224–3233.
64. Motter AF, Vasconcelos FA, Correa EN, Andrade DF. Retail food outlets and the association with overweight/obesity in schoolchildren from Florianópolis, Santa Catarina State, Brazil.
Cad Saude Publica2015;31(3): 620–632.
65. Matozinhos FP, Gomes CS, Andrade ACet al.Neighbourhood
environments and obesity among adults: a multilevel analysis of an
urban Brazilian context.Prev Med Rep2015;2: 337–341.
66. Duran AC, Lock K, Latorre MR, Jaime PC. Evaluating the use of in-store measures in retail food stores and restaurants in Brazil.
Rev Saude Publica2015;49: 80.
67. Muñoz de Chávez M, Chávez Villasana A, Chávez Muñoz M, Eichin Vuskovic I. Sale of street food in Latin America. The
Mexican case: joy or jeopardy?World Rev Nutr Diet2000;86:
138–154.
68. Leite FH, Oliveira MA, Cremm EC, Abreu DS, Maron LR, Martins PA. Availability of processed foods in the perimeter of public
schools in urban areas.J Pediatr (Rio J)2012;88(4): 328–334.
69. He M, Tucker P, Gilliland J, Irwin JD, Larsen K, Hess P. The
influence of local food environments on adolescents’ food
purchasing behaviors.Int J Environ Res Public Health2012;9(4):
1458–1471.
70. Van Hulst A, Barnett TA, Gauvin Let al.Associations between
children’s diets and features of their residential and school
neighbourhood food environments. Can J Public Health 2012;
103(9 Suppl 3): eS48–eS54.
71. Williams J, Scarborough P, Matthews Aet al.A systematic
review of the influence of the retail food environment around
schools on obesity-related outcomes. Obes Rev 2014; 15(5):
359–374.
72. Tester JM, Yen IH, Laraia B. Mobile food vending and the
after-school food environment. Am J Prev Med 2010; 38(1):
70–73.
73. Arámbulo P, Almeida CR, Cuéllar J, Belotto AJ. Street food
vending in Latin America. Bull Pan Am Health Organ 1994;
28(4): 344–354.
74. Barrera LH, Rothenberg SJ, Barquera S, Cifuentes E. The toxic food environment around elementary schools and childhood
obesity in Mexican cities.Am J Prev Med2016;51(2): 264–270.
75. Briefel RR, Crepinsek MK, Cabili C, Wilson A, Gleason PM. School food environments and practices affect dietary behaviors
of US public school children.J Am Diet Assoc2009;109(2 Suppl):
S91–107.
76. Fox MK, Dodd AH, Wilson A, Gleason PM. Association between school food environment and practices and body mass index
of US public school children.J Am Diet Assoc2009;109(2 Suppl):
S108–S117.
77. Azeredo CM, de Rezende LF, Canella DS et al. Food
environments in schools and in the immediate vicinity are associated with unhealthy food consumption among Brazilian
adolescents.Prev Med2016;88: 73–79.
78. Organización Panamericana de la Salud. Recomendaciones de la Consulta de Expertos de la Organización Panamericana de la Salud sobre la promoción y publicidad de alimentos y bebidas no alcohólicas dirigida a los niños en la Región de las Américas. Área
de Desarrollo Sostenible y Salud Ambiental (SDE). In.
Washington; 2011.
79. Mallarino C, Gomez LF, Gonzalez-Zapata L, Cadena Y, Parra DC. Advertising of ultra-processed foods and beverages: children as
a vulnerable population.Revista de Saúde Pública 2013;47(5):
1006–1010.
80. Busse P, Díaz R. What are the television viewing and eating
habits of children in Peru?Glob Health Promot2016;23(1): 50–60.
81. Rincón-Gallardo Patiño S, Tolentino-Mayo L, Flores
Monterrubio EA, Harris JL, Vandevijvere S, Rivera JA. Nutritional quality of foods and non-alcoholic beverages advertised on Mexican television according to three nutrient profile models.
BMC Public Health2016;16: 733.
82. Letona P, Chacon V, Roberto C, Barnoya J. Effects of licensed
characters on children’s taste and snack preferences in Guatemala,
a low/middle income country. International Journal of Obesity
2014;38(11): 1466–1469.
83. Chacon V, Letona P, Barnoya J. Child-oriented marketing
techniques in snack food packages in Guatemala. BMC Public
Health2013;13: 967.
84. Chacon V, Letona P, Villamor E, Barnoya J. Snack food advertising in stores around public schools in Guatemala.
Crit Public Health2015;25(3): 291–298.
85. Lozada M, Sánchez-Castillo CP, Cabrera GA, Mata II, Pichardo-Ontiveros E, Villa AR. School food in Mexican children.
Public Health Nutr2008;11(9): 924–933.
86. Ng SW, Popkin BM. Time use and physical activity: a shift
away from movement across the globe.Obesity Reviews 2012;
13(8): 659–680.
87. Katzmarzyk PT, Mason C. The physical activity transition.
J Phys Act Health2009;6(3): 269–280.
88. Bell AC, Ge K, Popkin BM. The road to obesity or the path to
prevention: motorized transportation and obesity in China.Obes
Res2002;10(4): 277–283.
89. Bell AC, Ge K, Popkin BM. Weight gain and its predictors in
Chinese adults. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 2001; 25(7):
1079–1086.
patterns and body weight in China.Eur J Clin Nutr2008;62(11):
1318–1325.
91. Monda KL, Gordon-Larsen P, Stevens J, Popkin BM. China’s
transition: the effect of rapid urbanization on adult occupational
physical activity.Soc Sci Med2007;64(4): 858–870.
92. Hallal PC, Andersen LB, Bull FCet al.Global physical activity
levels: surveillance progress, pitfalls, and prospects.Lancet2012;
380(9838): 247–257.
93. Bauman AE, Reis RS, Sallis JFet al. Correlates of physical
activity: why are some people physically active and others not?
Lancet2012;380(9838): 258–271.
94. Salvo D, Reis RS, Sarmiento OL, Pratt M. Overcoming the challenges of conducting physical activity and built environment
research in Latin America: IPEN Latin America.Prev Med2014;
69(Suppl 1): S86–S92.
95. Tremblay MS, Gray CE, Akinroye Ket al.Physical activity of
children: a global matrix of grades comparing 15 countries.J Phys
Act Health2014;11(Suppl 1): S113–S125.
96. Rodriguez M, Galaviz K, Jauregui E, Gonzalez-Casanova I,
Lopez y Taylor J. Results from Mexico’s 2014 Report Card on
Physical Activity for Children and Youth. Journal of Physical
activity & Health2014;11(Supp 1): S74–S78.
97. González S, Sarmiento O, Cohen D et al. Results from
Colombia’s 2014 Report Card on Physical Activity for Children
and Youth.Journal of Physical Activity & Health2014;11(Suppl
1): S33–S44.
98. Lubans DR, Hesketh K, Cliff DPet al.A systematic review
of the validity and reliability of sedentary behaviour measures
used with children and adolescents. Obes Rev 2011; 12(10):
781–799.
99. Gomez LF, Parra DC, Lobelo Fet al.Television viewing and its
association with overweight in Colombian children: results from
the 2005 National Nutrition Survey: a cross sectional study.Int J
Behav Nutr Phys Act2007;4: 41.
100. Isabela da Costa R, Taddei JA, Colugnatti F. Obesity among children attending elementary public schools in São Paulo, Brazil:
a case–control study.Public Health Nutr2003;6(7): 659–663.
101. Braithwaite I, Stewart AW, Hancox RJet al.The worldwide
association between television viewing and obesity in children and
adolescents: cross sectional study.PLoS One2013;8(9) e74263.
102. Becerra JM, Reis RS, Frank LDet al.Transport and health: a
look at three Latin American cities.Cad Saude Publica2013;29(4):
654–666.
103. Jauregui A, Medina C, Salvo D, Barquera S, Rivera-Dommarco JA. Active commuting to school in Mexican adolescents: evidence from the Mexican National Nutrition and
Health Survey.J Phys Act Health2014.
104. Soares R, Naritomi J. Understanding high crime rates in Latin America: the role of social and policy factors In: Rafael Di Tella SE, and Ernesto Schargrodsky, editors, editor. The Economics of Crime: Lessons for and from Latin America; 2010.
105. Pratt M, Sarmiento OL, Montes Fet al.The implications of
megatrends in information and communication technology and
transportation for changes in global physical activity. Lancet
2012;380(9838): 282–293.
106. Ng S, Norton E, Guilkey D, Popkin B. Estimation of a
dynamic model of weight. Empirical Economics 2012; 42(2):
413–443.
107. Ng SW, Norton EC, Popkin BM. Why have physical activity levels declined among Chinese adults? Findings from the
1991–2006 China Health and Nutrition Surveys.Social science &
medicine2009;68(7): 1305–1314.
108. LATINPOST. Latin America tech trends: rise of smartphones, tablets, and internet in the region. 2014.
109. Müller AM, Alley S, Schoeppe S, Vandelanotte C. The effectiveness of e-& mHealth interventions to promote physical activity and healthy diets in developing countries: a systematic
review.Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act2016;13(1): 109.
110. Rubinstein A, Miranda JJ, Beratarrechea Aet al.Effectiveness
of an mHealth intervention to improve the cardiometabolic profile of people with prehypertension in low-resource urban settings in
Latin America: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet Diabetes
Endocrinol2016;4(1): 52–63.
111. Howe KB, Suharlim C, Ueda P, Howe D, Kawachi I, Rimm
EB. Gotta catch’em all! Pokemon GO and physical activity among
young adults: difference in differences study. BMJ 2016; 355:
i6270.
112. Arango CM, Paez DC, Reis RS, Brownson RC, Parra DC. Association between the perceived environment and physical
activity among adults in Latin America: a systematic review.Int J
Behav Nutr Phys Act2013;10: 122.
113. Sallis JF, Glanz K. The role of built environments in physical
activity, eating, and obesity in childhood. Future Child 2006;
16(1): 89–108.
114. Salvo D, Reis RS, Stein AD, Rivera J, Martorell R, Pratt M. Characteristics of the built environment in relation to objectively measured physical activity among Mexican adults, 2011.
Prev Chronic Dis2014;11E147.
115. Zakiul M. Children and urban neighborhoods: relationships between outdoor activities of children and neighborhood physical characteristics in Dhaka, Bangladesh. Bangladesh: North Carolina State University; 2012.
116. Salvo D, Rei RS, Hino AA, Hallal PC, Pratt M. Intensity-specific leisure time physical activity and the built environment
among Brazilian adults: a best-fit model.J Phys Act Health2014.
117. Sarmiento OL, Schmid TL, Parra DCet al.Quality of life,
physical activity, and built environment characteristics among
Colombian adults. J Phys Act Health 2010; 7(Suppl 2):
S181–S195.
118. Sarmiento O, Torres A, Jacoby E, Pratt M, Schmid TL, Stierling G. The Ciclovia-Recreativa: a mass-recreational program
with public health potential.J Phys Act Health2010;7(Suppl 2):
S163–S180.
119. Parra DC, Hoehner CM, Hallal PC et al. Scaling up of
physical activity interventions in Brazil: how partnerships and
research evidence contributed to policy action.Glob Health Promot
2013;20(4): 5–12.
120. Torres A, Sarmiento OL, Stauber C, Zarama R. The Ciclovia and Cicloruta programs: promising interventions to promote
physical activity and social capital in Bogota. Colombia. Am J
Public Health2013;103(2): e23–e30.
121. Pratt M, Perez LG, Goenka Set al.Can population levels of
physical activity be increased? Global evidence and experience.
Prog Cardiovasc Dis2015;57(4): 356–367.
122. Pratt M, Brownson RC, Ramos LRet al.Project GUIA: A
model for understanding and promoting physical activity in Brazil
and Latin America. J Phys Act Health 2010; 7(Suppl 2):
S131–S134.
123. Parra DC, McKenzie TL, Ribeiro ICet al.Assessing physical
activity in public parks in Brazil using systematic observation.Am J
Public Health2010;100(8): 1420–1426.
124. Bürgi R, Tomatis L, Murer K, de Bruin ED. Localization of physical activity in primary school children using accelerometry
and global positioning system.PLoS One2015;10(11) e0142223.
125. Brooke HL, Corder K, Atkin AJ, van Sluijs EM. A systematic literature review with meta-analyses of within- and between-day differences in objectively measured physical activity in school-aged
126. Horacek TM, Dede Yildirim E, Kattelmann K et al. Path
analysis of campus walkability/bikeability and college students’
physical activity attitudes, behaviors, and body mass index.Am J
Health Promot2016.
127. Long MW, Sobol AM, Cradock AL, Subramanian SV, Blendon RJ, Gortmaker SL. School-day and overall physical
activity among youth.Am J Prev Med2013;45(2): 150–157.
128. Bassett DR, Fitzhugh EC, Heath GWet al.Estimated energy
expenditures for school-based policies and active living.Am J Prev
Med2013;44(2): 108–113.
129. Ribeiro IC, Parra DC, Hoehner CMet al.School-based physical
education programs: evidence-based physical activity interventions
for youth in Latin America.Glob Health Promot2010;17(2): 5–15.
130. Kain J, Uauy R, Lera L, Taibo M, Albala C. Trends in height and BMI of 6-year-old children during the nutrition transition in
Chile.Obes Res2005;13(12): 2178–2186.
131. Frenk J. The global health system: strengthening national
health systems as the next step for global progress. PLoS Med
2010;7(1) e1000089.
132. Uauy R, Albala C, Kain J. Obesity trends in Latin America:
transiting from under- to overweight.J Nutr2001;131(3): 893S–899S.
133. Uauy R, Kain J. The epidemiological transition: need to
incorporate obesity prevention into nutrition programmes.Public
Health Nutr2002;5(1A): 223–229.
134. Fernald LC, Gertler PJ, Neufeld LM. Role of cash in conditional cash transfer programmes for child health, growth,
and development: an analysis of Mexico’s oportunidades.Lancet
2008;371(9615): 828–837.
135. Fernald LC, Gertler PJ, Neufeld LM. 10-year effect of
oportunidades, Mexico’s conditional cash transfer programme, on
child growth, cognition, language, and behaviour: a longitudinal
follow-up study.Lancet2009;374(9706): 1997–2005.
136. Lee J, Houser RF, Must A, de Fulladolsa PP, Bermudez OI. Disentangling nutritional factors and household characteristics related to child stunting and maternal overweight in Guatemala.
Econ Hum Biol2010;8(2): 188–196.
137. Monterrosa EC, Campirano F, Tolentino Mayo L et al.
Stakeholder perspectives on national policy for regulating the
school food environment in Mexico. Health Policy Plan 2015;
30(1): 28–38.
138. Pehlke EL, Letona P, Hurley K, Gittelsohn J. Guatemalan
school food environment: impact on schoolchildren’s risk of both
undernutrition and overweight/obesity.Health Promot Int2016;
31(3): 542–550.
139. Gross R, Lechtig A, López de Romaña D. Baseline evaluation of nutritional status and government feeding programs
in Chiclayo, Peru. Food Nutr Bull 2006; 27(4 Suppl Peru):
S115–S121.
140. Corvalan C, Reyes M, Garmendia ML, Uauy R. Structural responses to the obesity and non-communicable diseases epidemic:
the Chilean Law of Food Labeling and Advertising. Obesity
Reviews2013;14: 79–87.
141. Barquera S, Campos I, Rivera JA. Mexico attempts to tackle
obesity: the process, results, push backs and future challenges.Obes
Rev2013;14(Suppl 2): 69–78.
142. Jaime PC, da Silva AC, Gentil PC, Claro RM, Monteiro CA.
Brazilian obesity prevention and control initiatives.Obes Rev2013;
14(Suppl 2): 88–95.
143. Freire WB, Waters WF, Rivas-Mariño G, Nguyen T, Rivas P. A qualitative study of consumer perceptions and use of traffic light
food labelling in Ecuador.Public Health Nutr2016: 1–9.
144. Kain J, Hernández Cordero S, Pineda D et al. Obesity
prevention in Latin America. Curr Obes Rep 2014; 3(2):
