• No results found

2. Share your thoughts on web research

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2020

Share "2. Share your thoughts on web research"

Copied!
67
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

Welcome Back

EDU531

Model Digital-Age Work and Learning

Jason Borgen

Adjunct Instructor

http://sites.google.com/site/edu531summer11

1. Go to:

http://bit.ly/day3-dis

2. Share your thoughts

on web research

(2)

Digital Native

(3)

Eliteracy

Creative fluency

Learning a new grammar

Interactive communication Use media to

evoke emotions Can transform the way

we learn

Multimodal

(4)

Objectives Today:

Learn how to locate effective research on the web and

assign appropriate research projects. Learn how to locate

and use podcasts for effective supplement material and

create your own podcast.

(5)

But First....

Let’s embed your Glog or Voki

(6)

Did you Know?

(7)
(8)

5 Steps to Evaluating Web Sites

(9)

5 Steps to Evaluating Web Sites

1.Accuracy of Web Documents

(10)

5 Steps to Evaluating Web Sites

1.Accuracy of Web Documents

• Who wrote the page and can you contact him or her?

(11)

5 Steps to Evaluating Web Sites

1.Accuracy of Web Documents

• Who wrote the page and can you contact him or her?

• What is the purpose of the document and why was it produced?

(12)

5 Steps to Evaluating Web Sites

1.Accuracy of Web Documents

• Who wrote the page and can you contact him or her?

• What is the purpose of the document and why was it produced? • Is this person qualified to write this document?

(13)

5 Steps to Evaluating Web Sites

1.Accuracy of Web Documents

• Who wrote the page and can you contact him or her?

• What is the purpose of the document and why was it produced? • Is this person qualified to write this document?

2. Authority of Web Documents

(14)

5 Steps to Evaluating Web Sites

1.Accuracy of Web Documents

• Who wrote the page and can you contact him or her?

• What is the purpose of the document and why was it produced? • Is this person qualified to write this document?

2. Authority of Web Documents

• Who published the document and is it separate from the "Webmaster?"

(15)

5 Steps to Evaluating Web Sites

1.Accuracy of Web Documents

• Who wrote the page and can you contact him or her?

• What is the purpose of the document and why was it produced? • Is this person qualified to write this document?

2. Authority of Web Documents

• Who published the document and is it separate from the "Webmaster?"

• Check the domain of the document, what institution publishes this document?

(16)

5 Steps to Evaluating Web Sites

1.Accuracy of Web Documents

• Who wrote the page and can you contact him or her?

• What is the purpose of the document and why was it produced? • Is this person qualified to write this document?

2. Authority of Web Documents

• Who published the document and is it separate from the "Webmaster?"

• Check the domain of the document, what institution publishes this document? • Does the publisher list his or her qualifications?

(17)

5 Steps to Evaluating Web Sites

1.Accuracy of Web Documents

• Who wrote the page and can you contact him or her?

• What is the purpose of the document and why was it produced? • Is this person qualified to write this document?

2. Authority of Web Documents

• Who published the document and is it separate from the "Webmaster?"

• Check the domain of the document, what institution publishes this document? • Does the publisher list his or her qualifications?

3. Objectivity of Web Documents

(18)

5 Steps to Evaluating Web Sites

1.Accuracy of Web Documents

• Who wrote the page and can you contact him or her?

• What is the purpose of the document and why was it produced? • Is this person qualified to write this document?

2. Authority of Web Documents

• Who published the document and is it separate from the "Webmaster?"

• Check the domain of the document, what institution publishes this document? • Does the publisher list his or her qualifications?

3. Objectivity of Web Documents

• What goals/objectives does this page meet?

(19)

5 Steps to Evaluating Web Sites

1.Accuracy of Web Documents

• Who wrote the page and can you contact him or her?

• What is the purpose of the document and why was it produced? • Is this person qualified to write this document?

2. Authority of Web Documents

• Who published the document and is it separate from the "Webmaster?"

• Check the domain of the document, what institution publishes this document? • Does the publisher list his or her qualifications?

3. Objectivity of Web Documents

• What goals/objectives does this page meet? • How detailed is the information?

(20)

5 Steps to Evaluating Web Sites

1.Accuracy of Web Documents

• Who wrote the page and can you contact him or her?

• What is the purpose of the document and why was it produced? • Is this person qualified to write this document?

2. Authority of Web Documents

• Who published the document and is it separate from the "Webmaster?"

• Check the domain of the document, what institution publishes this document? • Does the publisher list his or her qualifications?

3. Objectivity of Web Documents

• What goals/objectives does this page meet? • How detailed is the information?

• What opinions (if any) are expressed by the author?

(21)

5 Steps to Evaluating Web Sites

1.Accuracy of Web Documents

• Who wrote the page and can you contact him or her?

• What is the purpose of the document and why was it produced? • Is this person qualified to write this document?

2. Authority of Web Documents

• Who published the document and is it separate from the "Webmaster?"

• Check the domain of the document, what institution publishes this document? • Does the publisher list his or her qualifications?

3. Objectivity of Web Documents

• What goals/objectives does this page meet? • How detailed is the information?

• What opinions (if any) are expressed by the author? 4. Currency of Web Documents

(22)

5 Steps to Evaluating Web Sites

1.Accuracy of Web Documents

• Who wrote the page and can you contact him or her?

• What is the purpose of the document and why was it produced? • Is this person qualified to write this document?

2. Authority of Web Documents

• Who published the document and is it separate from the "Webmaster?"

• Check the domain of the document, what institution publishes this document? • Does the publisher list his or her qualifications?

3. Objectivity of Web Documents

• What goals/objectives does this page meet? • How detailed is the information?

• What opinions (if any) are expressed by the author? 4. Currency of Web Documents

• When was it produced?

(23)

5 Steps to Evaluating Web Sites

1.Accuracy of Web Documents

• Who wrote the page and can you contact him or her?

• What is the purpose of the document and why was it produced? • Is this person qualified to write this document?

2. Authority of Web Documents

• Who published the document and is it separate from the "Webmaster?"

• Check the domain of the document, what institution publishes this document? • Does the publisher list his or her qualifications?

3. Objectivity of Web Documents

• What goals/objectives does this page meet? • How detailed is the information?

• What opinions (if any) are expressed by the author? 4. Currency of Web Documents

• When was it produced? • When was it updated'

(24)

5 Steps to Evaluating Web Sites

1.Accuracy of Web Documents

• Who wrote the page and can you contact him or her?

• What is the purpose of the document and why was it produced? • Is this person qualified to write this document?

2. Authority of Web Documents

• Who published the document and is it separate from the "Webmaster?"

• Check the domain of the document, what institution publishes this document? • Does the publisher list his or her qualifications?

3. Objectivity of Web Documents

• What goals/objectives does this page meet? • How detailed is the information?

• What opinions (if any) are expressed by the author? 4. Currency of Web Documents

• When was it produced? • When was it updated'

• How up-to-date are the links (if any)?

(25)

5 Steps to Evaluating Web Sites

1.Accuracy of Web Documents

• Who wrote the page and can you contact him or her?

• What is the purpose of the document and why was it produced? • Is this person qualified to write this document?

2. Authority of Web Documents

• Who published the document and is it separate from the "Webmaster?"

• Check the domain of the document, what institution publishes this document? • Does the publisher list his or her qualifications?

3. Objectivity of Web Documents

• What goals/objectives does this page meet? • How detailed is the information?

• What opinions (if any) are expressed by the author? 4. Currency of Web Documents

• When was it produced? • When was it updated'

• How up-to-date are the links (if any)? 5. Coverage of the Web Documents

(26)

5 Steps to Evaluating Web Sites

1.Accuracy of Web Documents

• Who wrote the page and can you contact him or her?

• What is the purpose of the document and why was it produced? • Is this person qualified to write this document?

2. Authority of Web Documents

• Who published the document and is it separate from the "Webmaster?"

• Check the domain of the document, what institution publishes this document? • Does the publisher list his or her qualifications?

3. Objectivity of Web Documents

• What goals/objectives does this page meet? • How detailed is the information?

• What opinions (if any) are expressed by the author? 4. Currency of Web Documents

• When was it produced? • When was it updated'

• How up-to-date are the links (if any)? 5. Coverage of the Web Documents

• Are the links (if any) evaluated and do they complement the documents' theme?

(27)

5 Steps to Evaluating Web Sites

1.Accuracy of Web Documents

• Who wrote the page and can you contact him or her?

• What is the purpose of the document and why was it produced? • Is this person qualified to write this document?

2. Authority of Web Documents

• Who published the document and is it separate from the "Webmaster?"

• Check the domain of the document, what institution publishes this document? • Does the publisher list his or her qualifications?

3. Objectivity of Web Documents

• What goals/objectives does this page meet? • How detailed is the information?

• What opinions (if any) are expressed by the author? 4. Currency of Web Documents

• When was it produced? • When was it updated'

• How up-to-date are the links (if any)? 5. Coverage of the Web Documents

• Are the links (if any) evaluated and do they complement the documents' theme?

• Is it all images or a balance of text and images?

(28)

5 Steps to Evaluating Web Sites

1.Accuracy of Web Documents

• Who wrote the page and can you contact him or her?

• What is the purpose of the document and why was it produced? • Is this person qualified to write this document?

2. Authority of Web Documents

• Who published the document and is it separate from the "Webmaster?"

• Check the domain of the document, what institution publishes this document? • Does the publisher list his or her qualifications?

3. Objectivity of Web Documents

• What goals/objectives does this page meet? • How detailed is the information?

• What opinions (if any) are expressed by the author? 4. Currency of Web Documents

• When was it produced? • When was it updated'

• How up-to-date are the links (if any)? 5. Coverage of the Web Documents

• Are the links (if any) evaluated and do they complement the documents' theme?

• Is it all images or a balance of text and images? • Is the information presented cited correctly

(29)

Go to: http://bit.ly/eval-web-tutorial

(30)

Go to: http://bit.ly/eval-web-tutorial

(31)

HW

Using Rubistar--Rubric maker (another tools

from 4teachers at rubistar.4teachers.org

Create a rubric to evaluate a students web

research keeping in mind of the 5 ways to

evaluate websites.

(32)

Break

(33)
(34)
(35)
(36)

A Podcast

Experience

(37)

Think/Pair/Share

(38)

Think/Pair/Share

As you listen to these

THINK

about how the

students are learning and HOW this is

beneficial to students

(39)

Think/Pair/Share

As you listen to these

THINK

about how the

students are learning and HOW this is

beneficial to students

SHARE

with the person sitting next to you.

(40)

Podcast Definition

New Oxford American Dictionary

A digital recording of a radio

broadcast or similar program,

made available on the Internet

for downloading to a personal

audio player, but the generally

accepted definition has

expanded to include video as

well as audio.

Originally derived from a

combination of "broadcasting"

and "iPod ™," the word was

declared "word of the year"

when it was added to the

dictionary at the end of 2005.

(41)

Podcast Definition

New Oxford American Dictionary

A digital recording of a radio

broadcast or similar program,

made available on the Internet

for downloading to a personal

audio player, but the generally

accepted definition has

expanded to include video as

well as audio.

Originally derived from a

combination of "broadcasting"

and "iPod ™," the word was

declared "word of the year"

when it was added to the

dictionary at the end of 2005.

Jason’s Mind

Any type of recording program

(Audio, video, or screen

capture) that is posted

(published) online on a regular

basis

AND

Is available through

“subscribing” (podcatching) via

a program of choice (i.e.,

iTunes) rather than having to

go back to the website to

retrieve the latest episode

(42)

Listening/Viewing to Podcasts

On an iPod

On the computer

Burn to a CD/DVD

On another type of digital music/video player

Do you need an iPod to be into podcasting?

(43)
(44)

Podcast Web Quest

Go to

http://trackstar.4teachers.org

Type in the number

368215

in “View Track#”

Click Go.

Click on “view in frames”

Answer the question on top before you move

to the next site.

(45)

Podcast Web Quest

Go to

http://trackstar.4teachers.org

Type in the number

368215

in “View Track#”

Click Go.

Click on “view in frames”

Answer the question on top before you move

to the next site.

(46)

Subscribing/Podcatching

Many programs to do this, but

everyone is

using iTunes!

iTunes has a searchable database of

podcasts you can browse through from .

Let’s Explore in iTunes

(47)

Your Turn to Find Podcasts

Open iTunes

Click on Podcasts

Click on Podcast directory

You can search OR browse

(categories to the left)

Notice Education?? ALSO

iTunesU!

What you find?

(48)

Other useful sites to find podcasts

(49)

Other useful sites to find podcasts

Go to: epnweb.org

(50)

Other useful sites to find podcasts

Go to: epnweb.org

To “podcatch” these, simply drag the RSS

Feed or icon into iTunes

(51)

Other useful sites to find podcasts

Go to: epnweb.org

To “podcatch” these, simply drag the RSS

Feed or icon into iTunes

(52)

Creating your own and students

podcasts

Three Steps Only!

CREATE

[What YOU do]

Make an audio file

Audacity

, Garageband, or online tools like GCast

DISTRIBUTE

[What YOU do]

Move the audio file to a web server

Yours, your district’s, a hosted solution

ACCESS

[What THEY do]

RSS feed

Your clients subscribe/podcatch

(53)

Why Podcast?

It’s personal

Expressive Creativity

Integrating Skills

Enhance current projects

Presentations or publications

Real audiences for student work

Our students are digital learners

Increase your communication/accountability

ISTE NETS Standards

(54)

Podcast Ideas

(55)

Let’s Podcast-- CREATE

What makes this area a great area to live in!

You need:

a microphone

a sound editing program

a script

some groovy background

music

(56)

Team Roles During a Podcast

(57)

Let’s Plan

(58)

Let’s Plan

In teams:

(59)

Let’s Plan

In teams:

Use template to write a script for:

Evaluating websites while doing web

research.

(60)

Let’s Plan

In teams:

Use template to write a script for:

Evaluating websites while doing web

research.

Decide who will be segment and show producers, and

webmaster

(61)

Let’s Plan

In teams:

Use template to write a script for:

Evaluating websites while doing web

research.

Decide who will be segment and show producers, and

webmaster

Record show

(62)

Let’s Plan

In teams:

Use template to write a script for:

Evaluating websites while doing web

research.

Decide who will be segment and show producers, and

webmaster

Record show

Edit show

(63)

Let’s Plan

In teams:

Use template to write a script for:

Evaluating websites while doing web

research.

Decide who will be segment and show producers, and

webmaster

Record show

Edit show

Add background and sound effects

(64)

Test your feed in iTunes

You know how to do this!

Drag and drop the feed website into iTunes!

(65)

Test your feed in iTunes

You know how to do this!

Drag and drop the feed website into iTunes!

(66)

Group Work

In same teams:

Discuss ideas of podcasting in the content

area.

What are some ways you can podcast to

enhance communication for parents and

the community?

What are some ways you can podcast to

help students?

What are some ways you can provide PBL

using podcasting for students.

Now get in Grade Level teams and repeat!

(67)

References

Related documents

The Bachelor of Science in Electrical Engineering with the special designation “Area of Emphasis in Integrated Media Systems” is earned by successfully completing the

In PeopleSoft, once a Person is assigned to a Position, a Job Record is created and all criteria that is required to perform that specific job (such as being bilingual,

This study sought to ascertain the quality of environmental reporting as per company characteristics such as size, profitability, and leverage and industry type

In this 2019 issue, we present a total of five articles that cover a broad spectrum of accounting fields, namely earnings management, disclosure, tax compliance issues,

communities are those that contribute to the physical, social, and mental well-being of its inhabitants and provide an opportunity for personal growth. It is not surprising that such

In this manuscript, we present an analysis of column-averaged dry air mole fractions of atmospheric methane (denoted XCH 4 ) retrieved from the SCIAMACHY (SCan- ning Imaging

Indeed, this condition sim- ply means that fi rm 2 alone is better o ff leaving the market than matching pro fi t-enhancing exclusive contracts o ff ered by fi rm 1 (by o ff ering