• No results found

Sokoine University Agriculture

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Sokoine University Agriculture"

Copied!
8
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

1

Appendix A

Sokoine University Agriculture

Centre for Information and Communication Technology

Ranking of Website of University Units for the First Quarter as of

January to March, 2016

1. Background

1.1. In reference to the 139th meeting of the SUA Council held on 1st October 2015, it was approved that “University-wide Website Committee (UWC) shall approve the ranking of websites of university units” (ICT Guidelines No 186-188). It was approved that website ranking should be done at least once per quarter and the leading units will be rewarded while the units that will be losing for two consecutive years will be penalized.

1.2. The UWC in its 6th meeting held on 23rd November 2015, approved the scoring system, the Google webmaster Tools and other ICT measures to be used for ranking the units websites. The UWC argued that the first ranking results should be published around March, 2016.

2. The scoring System

The 6th meeting of UWC approved the scoring system (Table 1) in which five criteria were approved to provide the points.

2.1. Visibility/metadata is information about data stored in a database. Normally, metadata information is used by search engine (such as Google) to index web information.

2.2. The number of clicks depicts the importance of the website that users visit. This means your site is visible to the users and contains the information that the users want. For example, a student will click on a link about course information before he registers for the course

2.3. Incoming links/external links: these are the number of the links in which other websites refer to SUA website. They are called referring domains. SUA website will always be mentioned in the collaborating institutions websites. This is the place where SUA website gets high ranking.

(2)

2 website contents uploading.

Table 1: Scoring and weightage system

SN CRITERIA POINTS

1 Visibility/Meta data information/Appearance 10

2 Visibility/ Number of clicks 10

3 Visibility/Importance Number of Incoming links (referring domains)/external links

40

4 Size of the website/ Number of Internal Links 30

5 Updates and responsiveness 10

3. Methodology

Data was collected from various 42 units of the University based on the criteria mentioned in Table 1 above using the approved tool. Data used to calculate the ranking results mentioned is shown in Table 2, Table 3, Table 4 and Table 5. A threshold value was generated for each criterion, which lead to obtain the points for each criterion. So, the points for each criterion were obtained by the formula, (specific data for each criterion collected over threshold value of the specific criterion times points generated for each criterion).

4. Ranking results

The approved ranking tools together with the scoring system have led to the ranking results categorized into three types of ranking results. The first category is for overall ranking results for all units in the University. In the overall results (Table 2) shows that DRPGS was ranked first, followed by DSI which is the second, the third is College of Agriculture, the fourth is Faculty of Forestry and Nature Conservation and the fifth is SNAL. The position of the other units is shown in Table 2. It should be noted also that, for administrative departments SUA Health centre was ranked first (Table 5) and SUA TV is ranked a second.

Table 2: Overall Results

SN Name of the Unit Meta data Number of clicks Number of Incoming/ external links Number of Internal Links Updates and responsive ness Points (%) Position 1 DRPGS 0 10.1 38.2 29 5 82.2 1 2 DSI 0 10 13.3 30 10 63.3 2 3 College of Agriculture 0 10 40 5.5 5 60.5 3 4 Faculty of Forestry and Nature 0 10 14.8 10.3 10 45.1 4

(3)

3 SN Name of the Unit Meta data Number of clicks Number of Incoming/ external links Number of Internal Links Updates and responsive ness Points (%) Position Conservation 5 SNAL 0 6.1 11.7 8.4 10 36.2 5 6 FVM 0 3.8 11 11 10 35.7 6 7 SPMC 0 4.4 15.1 8.6 5 33 7 8 Department of Forestry Biology 0 3.4 1.1 17.1 10 31.7 8 9 Faculty of Science 0 3.1 9.7 5.3 10 28.1 9 10 School of Agricultural Economics and Business Studies 0 9.6 5.4 8.1 5 28.1 10 11 ICE 0 2.5 11.7 8.6 5 27.8 11 12 SCSRD 0 1.8 9 11.1 5 27 12 13 Department of Crop Science and Production 0 9.1 2.9 7.9 5 24.9 13 14 Department of Animal Science 0 5.7 4.5 8.6 5 23.8 14 15 Department of Forestry Engineering 0 3.6 2.7 7 10 23.3 15 16 Department of Informatics 0 0.2 5.8 4.3 10 20.3 16 17 Department of Food Technology, Nutrition and Consumer Studies 0 2.6 0.7 6.9 10 20.2 17 18 Department of Soil Science 0 3.2 2.9 8.9 5 20.1 18 19 Department of Biological Science 0 0.2 5.8 3.4 10 19.4 19 20 Department of Agricultural Engineering and Land Planning 0 1.8 2.5 9.9 5 19.2 20

(4)

4 21 Department of Agricultural Education and Extension 0 1 2.5 9.3 5 17.8 21 22 SUA Health Centre 0 0.8 7 4.5 5 17.2 22 23 SUATV 0 0.8 1.1 7.7 5 14.6 23 24 Department of Wood Utilization 0 0 1.1 3.4 10 14.6 24 25 Department of Forestry Economics 0 0 0.4 3.6 10 14.1 25 26 Department of Wildlife 0 2.1 2.9 3.4 5 13.4 26 27 SMC 0 0.9 3.4 2.9 5 12.2 27 28 Department of Forest Mensuration and Management 0 1.7 2.2 1.7 5 10.7 28 29 Estates Department 0 0.1 0.7 2.4 5 8.2 29 30 Department of Planning 0 0.1 0.4 2.6 5 8.1 30 31 Department of veterinary anatomy 0 0.1 0.4 1 5 6.6 31 32 Department of Veterinary Microbiology 0 0.1 0.4 1 5 6.5 32 33 Department of Veterinary Pathology 0 0 0.4 1 5 6.5 33 34 Department of Veterinary Physiology 0 0 0.4 0.7 5 6.2 34 35 Department of Veterinary Surgery 0 0 0.4 0.7 5 6.2 35 36 Department of Biometry and 0 0 0 0 0 0 36

(5)

5 SN Name of the Unit Meta data Number of clicks Number of Incoming/ external links Number of Internal Links Updates and responsive ness Points (%) Position Mathematics 37 Department of Education 0 0 0 0 0 0 36 38 Department of Physical Science 0 0 0 0 0 0 36 39 Department of Social Science 0 0 0 0 0 0 36 40 Office of Dean of Students 0 0 0 0 0 0 36 41 Department of Human Resource 0 0 0 0 0 0 36 42 Department of Finance 0 0 0 0 0 0 36

Table 3: Ranking results for the Colleges, Faculties, Institutes, directorates, centres and the SUA Library SN Name of the Unit Meta data Number of clicks Number of Incoming/ external links Number of Internal Links Updates and responsiveness Points (%) Position 1 DRPGS 0 10.1 38.2 29 5 82.2 1 2 DSI 0 10 13.3 30 10 63.3 2 3 College of Agriculture 0 10 40 5.5 5 60.5 3 4 FoFNC 0 10 14.8 10.3 10 45.1 4 5 SNAL 0 6.1 11.7 8.4 10 36.2 5 6 FVM 0 3.8 11 11 10 35.7 6 7 SPMC 0 4.4 15.1 8.6 5 33 7 8 Faculty of Science 0 3.1 9.7 5.3 10 28.1 8 9 ICE 0 2.5 11.7 8.6 5 27.8 9 10 SCSRD 0 1.8 9 11.1 5 27 10 11 SMC 0 0.9 3.4 2.9 5 12.2 11

(6)

6 external links Internal Links 1 Department of Forestry Biology 0 3.4 1.1 17.1 10 31.7 1 2 School of Agricultural Economics and Business Studies 0 9.6 5.4 8.1 5 28.1 2 3 Department of Crop Science and Production 0 9.1 2.9 7.9 5 24.9 3 4 Department of Animal Science 0 5.7 4.5 8.6 5 23.8 4 5 Department of Forestry Engineering 0 3.6 2.7 7 10 23.3 5 6 Department of Informatics 0 0.2 5.8 4.3 10 20.3 6 7 Department of Food Technology, Nutrition and Consumer Studies 0 2.6 0.7 6.9 10 20.2 7 8 Department of Soil Science 0 3.2 2.9 8.9 5 20.1 8 9 Department of Biological Science 0 0.2 5.8 3.4 10 19.4 9 10 Department of Agricultural Engineering and Land Planning 0 1.8 2.5 9.9 5 19.2 10 11 Department of Agricultural Education and Extension 0 1 2.5 9.3 5 17.8 11 12 Department of Wood Utilization 0 0 1.1 3.4 10 14.6 12

(7)

7 SN Name of the Unit Meta data Number of clicks Number of Incoming/ external links Number of Internal Links Updates and responsiveness Points (%) Position 13 Department of Forestry Economics 0 0 0.4 3.6 10 14.1 13 14 Department of Wildlife 0 2.1 2.9 3.4 5 13.4 14 15 Department of Forest Mensuration and Management 0 1.7 2.2 1.7 5 10.7 15 16 Department of Veterinary Anatomy 0 0.1 0.4 1 5 6.6 16 17 Department of Veterinary Microbiology 0 0.1 0.4 1 5 6.5 17 18 Department of Veterinary Pathology 0 0 0.4 1 5 6.5 18 19 Department of Veterinary Physiology 0 0 0.4 0.7 5 6.2 19 20 Department of Veterinary Surgery 0 0 0.4 0.7 5 6.2 20 21 Department of Biometry and Mathematics 0 0 0 0 0 0 21 22 Department of Education 0 0 0 0 0 0 21 23 Department of Physical Science 0 0 0 0 0 0 21 24 Department of Social Science 0 0 0 0 0 0 21

(8)

8 xternal links Internal Links 1 SUA Health Centre 0 0.8 7 4.5 5 17.2 1 2 SUATV 0 0.8 1.1 7.7 5 14.6 2 3 Estates Department 0 0.1 0.7 2.4 5 8.2 3 4 Department of Planning 0 0.1 0.4 2.6 5 8.1 4 5 Office of Dean of Students 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 6 Department of Human Resource 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 7 Department of Finance 0 0 0 0 0 0 5

References

Related documents

Ilya Yablokov, « Social networks of death: conspiracy panics and professional journalistic ethics in the post-Soviet Russia », Quaderni [Online], 94 | Automne 2017, Online since

The Fenland Study is an ongoing, population-based cohort study (started in 2005) designed to investigate the association between genetic and lifestyle environmental factors and

Importantly, direct uptake is influenced by the nitrogen:phosphorus (N:P) content in both the cells and the surrounding wastewater with opposite trends observed for

The stream functions for the free surface ow, at a Froude number of 2.0, is shown in Figure 4 and are compared with the stream functions for a conventional driven cavity (Figure

Success in reading memorial high guidance counselor or sites to provide accounts for updated ap exam rosters and drop is given to their senior year course is a spreadsheet!. Too

qualitative risk analysis assesses the priority of identified risk using their relative probability of likelihood of occurrence, the corresponding impact on project objectives if

The expansion of aquaculture and the recent development of more intensive land-based marine farms require commercially-valuable halophytic plants for the treatment

Off eastern Newfoundland, the depth-averaged ocean temperature ranged from a record low during 1991 (high NAO index in preceding winter), a near record high in 1996 (following