Artificial
Weathering,
Durability Testing,
and Fade Resistance
Testing Durability of Synthetic Turf
•
The purpose of presentation
• Review FIFA & ASTM test procedures
• Glimpse at the historical background on artificial grass durability
requirements
• Methods of testing product performance
• Methods of measuring levels of performance
Review current accelerated weathering guidelines for
synthetic turf sports fields, landscapes, and leisure areas
to determine if they correctly assess product
performance .
Testing Durability of Synthetic Turf
• The purpose of presentation
•
Review FIFA / ASTM test procedures
• Glimpse at the historical background on artificial grass durability
requirements
• Methods of testing product performance
• Methods of measuring levels of performance
In December 2011, STC Accepted ASTM & FIFA Procedures
This was a very
important step in
establishing a bench
mark for product
performance in the US.
The STC adopted ASTM and FIFA
procedures and test guidelines to
measure the quality of multiple use
sports playing field. Landscape and
leisure turf is not covered by these
guidelines.
Testing Durability of Synthetic Turf
• The purpose of presentation
• Review FIFA / ASTM test procedures
•
Glimpse at the historical background on
artificial grass durability requirements
• Methods of testing product performance
• Methods of measuring levels of performance
Background on Product
Performance Standards
• “In 2001, FIFA launched Quality
Concept as a
means to test
soccer
/ football fields to assess the
ball
surface interaction, player surface
interaction and the durability of
fields
.”
This is quote taken from
the Handbook of Requirements
– Color changes after weathering should not be lower than a 3 on a AATCC
gray scale per test EN ISO 20150-A02 – Tensile retention after weathering
should be no less than 50% per test DIN EN 13864.
Rating of 3 on
gray scale = DE
of 3.4 in CIE
LAB values
FIFA Handbook of Test Methods
for Artificial Weathering
• FIFA Test Method 10 before 2012 stated:
– Use of ISO 4892-3 accelerated weathering conditions will result in 4896 MJ/m2 after approximately 3000 hours
• FIFA’s 2012 handbook states:
– Use of ISO 4892-3 accelerated weathering conditions result in
4896 kJ/m2 after approximately 2500 hours
• FIFA set the standards for testing sports fields
• I have not found test standards for landscape or leisure
areas
Testing Durability of Synthetic Turf
• The purpose of presentation
• Review FIFA / ASTM test procedures
• Glimpse at the historical background on artificial grass durability
requirements
•
Methods of testing product performance
• Methods of measuring levels of performance
Posted Turf Weathering
Specifications for Sports Fields
Reference
Light
MJ/m
2 TSR 300-2450 nmMJ/m
2 UV 295-385 nmHours
FIFA 2001-2011 UVA 340 - 4896 3000 FIFA 2012 UVA 340 -4.
896 2500DIN 18035-7 Xenon 7500 - Not stated
LND UVB 313 - Not stated 2500
ISO 4892-3 for Fluorescent UV’s
Irradiance 0.76 W/m2 at 340 nm Lamps UVA 340 Chamber temperature 60 C on light / 50 C dk. cycle Light/dark cycle 8 hrs. UV / 4 hrs. dark% Humidity Not specified
Irradiance 0.83 W/m2 at 313 nm Lamps UVB 313 Chamber temperature 43 C
Relative Humidity Not specified
Light/dark cycle 4 hrs. light / 2 hrs. dark cycle
Spray 2 min. in dark cycle
Spectral Power Distribution Supplied by Q-Lab
FIFA specified ISO 4892-3 UVA-340 LND (Lega Nazionale Dilettanti) specified ISO 4892-3 UVB-314
ISO 4892-2 for Xenon Arcs
Irradiance 0.50 W/m2 at 340 nm Filter combination Borosilicate in / out Black panel temperature 65 C + /- 3 Chamber temperature 43 C Relative Humidity 50%Light/dark cycle Continuous UV Spray 18 min. front spray
Spectral Power Distribution of a Type Boro S inner/Type Boro S outer
filter combination 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 280 480 680 880 1080 1280 1480 1680 1880 2080 2280 Wavelength (nanometers) Spe ct ra l Irra d ia n ce (W /m ²•nm )
ISO-4892-2 is specified in DIN 18035-7
Sports Ground Part 7: Synthetic Turf Areas
This is a Xenon Arc which
we use for ISO 4892-2
This is a QUV which we use
for ISO 4892-3 with
UVA-MJ/m
2
of Irradiance for
UVA-340 Lamp / ISO 4892-3
• The integrated irradiance for UVA
calibrated at 0.76 W/m2 is
45.1W/m2
• This calculates to 0.163
MJ/m
2/hr of light cycle
• 0.163 x 3000 hrs. = 489.6 MJ/m2
• Therefore in 3000 hours of light, a
QUV with a UVA lamp which was
calibrated for 0.76 W/m2 at 340 nm
will have a total of 489.6 MJ/m2 of
UV irradiance.
• If the test was only run for 3000
hours, with specified light dark
cycle, 489.6 x 0.66 = 323 MJ/m2 of
UV irradiance.
Spectral Graph & Calculations Supplied by
MJ/m
2
of Irradiance for
Xenon Arc Lamp / ISO 4892-2
• Based on the spectral power
distribution with Boro S /
Boro S filters at 0.50 W/m2
calibration; the sum of all
wavelengths is 1177 W/m2.
• W/m2 x 0.0036 x 1 Hour =
4.237 MJ/m
2per hour
Spectral Power Distribution of a Type Boro S inner/Type Boro S outer filter combination 0.0 2.0 4.0 6.0 8.0 10.0 12.0 280 380 480 580 680 780 880 980 1080 1180 1280 1380 1480 1580 Wavelength (nanometers) Spe ctr al Ir ra d ia n ce (W /m ²•nm )
Testing Durability of Synthetic Turf
• The purpose of presentation
• Review FIFA / ASTM test procedures
• Glimpse at the historical background on artificial grass durability
requirements
• Methods of testing product performance
•
Methods of measuring levels of performance
Global Climate Averages for Year 2010
Location Relative Humidity % Rain Fall mm Ave. Ambient Temp. °C TSR 300 – 2450 nm Direct Exposure 50 MJ/m2 UV Radiation 295 – 385 nm MJ/m2 Phoenix, AZ 34 401 22 7453 365 Miami, FL 77 1405 23 6198 343 Medina, OH 72 844 10 5100 Sanary, France 58 575 14 5412 194 Guangzhou, China 79 1492 22 4590 Choshi, Japan 78 1682 14 4659 Melbourne, Australia 62 650 16 5385Weathering Variables
Comparing Turf Weathering
Specifications to Outdoor Sunlight
Test
Light
MJ/m
2 TSR 300-2450 nmMJ/m
2 UV 295-385 nmHours
of UVA lightYears
Out Doors in Arizona FIFA 2001-2011 UVA 340 - 4896 3000 4896 is Over 13.3FIFA 2012 UVA 340 - 4.896 2500 5 days
DIN 18035-7 Xenon 7500 - At least
1
LND UVB 313 - - 2500 ?
Phoenix Sunlight 7453 365 - 1
NASA’s Global Solar Irradiation For
1 Yr. in (Kilo Langleys)
Kilo Langleys Can be Used to
Establish Guidelines
To Convert Exposure in Langleys to Q-Sun Test Times Enter exposure in kiloLangleys here: 140
Conversion to joules (300-3000 nm) 5,857,600,000 joules 5,857,600.00 kJ 5,857.60 MJ Conversion to joules (300-800 nm) 3,151,388,800 joules 3,151,388.80 kJ 3,151.39 MJ Enter Q-Sun Set Point Here: Can be a
340 or 420 nm set point--check appropriate column for correct time of
exposure 0.5 W/m2 Filter 340 nm Conversion Factor 340 nm control point: Time in hours 420 nm Conversion Factor 420 nm Control Point: Time in Hours Extended UV -- Quartz 1752.7 1857 883.3 3684 Extended UV -- Q/B 2100.0 1550 863.0 3771 Daylight -- B/B 1988.6 1636 877.0 3711
140 Kilo Langleys Requires
1636 Hrs of Testing
Conversion Table Supplied by Q-Lab
If markets from 80 to 160 kL’s per year of total solar radiance
are targeted, they need minimum of 9,350 hours to a
maximum of 18,700 hours of testing under ISO 4892-2. This
is for 10 years exterior predicted or estimated performance.
Example of 3000 hrs. Pass / 6000 Fail
y = 1E-06x2 - 0.0021x + 1.9671 R2 = 0.9974 y = 5E-07x2 - 0.0012x + 1.1841 R2 = 0.9989 0.00 5.00 10.00 15.00 20.00 25.00 30.00 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 hours DE 0.1 RED 184 1.0 RED 184 Poly. (0.1 RED 184) Poly. (1.0 RED 184)Testing Durability of Synthetic Turf
• The purpose of presentation
• Review FIFA / ASTM test procedures
• Glimpse at the historical background on artificial grass durability
requirements
• Methods of testing product performance
• Methods of measuring levels of performance
Conclusions
• Test standards need to meet today’s demands for
weathering product performances of 5 to 10 years out
doors.
• Predictions of product life or warranties are dependent
on the climate of the installation area. 3,000 hours of
accelerated weathering is inadequate. Consider 9,000
to 17,000 hours depending on test method, location, and
number of years expected life of field.
• Test procedures help improve quality of performance.
• Developing products for this type of performance criteria
are demanding, time consuming, and expensive.
Special Thanks for Technical Assistance and Input From
Sean Fowler Q-Lab
Matt McGreer Ametek’s Atlas Div.
Special Thanks
Krista Willey Shaw Turf Kelly Wootten Americhem Rick Doyle