Insect Control Update
Diane Alston
Entomologist, Utah State University
Utah State Horticultural Association Annual Convention
January 31, 2012
Springville, UT
Insect Control Update
¤ Spotted Wing Drosophila & Cherry
Fruit Fly – Insecticides
¤ Killing Stations and Bait Trees for
Cherry Fruit Fly
¤ A New Insecticide for Rosy Apple
Aphid
¤ Pheromone Technologies for
Prionus Root Borer
¤ 2011 Top Secondary Insect Pests
¤ Fruittree Leafroller
¤ White Apple Leafhopper
¤ Peach Silver Mite
¤ Earwig management in peaches
¤ Drew Tebeau, PhD Student
Spotted Wing Drosophila Update
¤ 2011: 60 flies caught in 3 Davis
Co. fruit sites (36 sites)
¤ Fruit Heights & Kaysville
¤ Trap catches: mid Sep to late Oct
¤ 2010: 73 flies, Kaysville (10 sites)
¤ mid Aug to late Nov
¤ Timing for control: ripe fruit
present
¤ just before harvest, during
harvest, post-harvest
Male
Female
Oregon Sweet Cherry SWD
Insecticide Recommendations
Harvest Time
Product Common Name REI PHI
Assail 30SG/70WP acetamiprid 12 h 7 d Delegate 25WG spinetoram 4 h 7 d Entrust 80WPOrg spinosad 4 h 7 d
Malathion 8EC malathion 12 h 3 d Provado 1.6F imidacloprid1 appl 12 h 7 d
Sevin 4F carbaryl 12 h 3 d Success 2L spinosad 4 h 7 d
Post-Harvest Clean-up: Dimethoate
Emergency Use Only (Restricted Use; toxic to beneficials; mite flare): Asana, Baythroid, Diazinon, Pounce, Proaxis, Warrior
Susceptibility of WCFF to Insecticides
Harvest Time
Mustang Max, Malathion, Delegate
¤ Wee Yee
(USDA-ARS, Wapato, WA)
¤ Reproductively mature (RM) flies
are present (harvest time):
¤ Must kill ~78% of RM flies within 2 hr
to prevent oviposition
¤ Mustang Max (zeta-cypermethrin) –
most effective; fast knock-down;
contact, walking on residues
(coverage)
¤ Malathion and Delegate (spinetoram) –
slower acting; contact, walking on
residues (full coverage)
Yee and Alston, 2011
2012 Research Plans
Develop Comprehensive Fruit Fly Program
for Tart Cherry
¤ Cherry fruit fly – Spotted
wing drosophila
insecticide control
programs
¤ Classes of insecticides
¤ Timing
¤ Focus on harvest-time &
post-harvest
utahpests.usu.edu
Fruit Fly Killing Stations
WCFF
Dr. Jaime Pinero,
Lincoln Univ. of Missouri 36 inch diameter plastic plant pot saucers
Yellow color attracts flies
Killing Station Density
GF-120 (20%)
KS density
Mean no.
of
WCFF
larvae
emerged
per
100
fruit
Jul 7
(pre‐trial)
Jul 14
Jul 21
Jul 28
Aug 5
9
per
acre
2.7
3.2
1.2
2.5
0.5
18
per
acre
2.3
0.3
0.3
0
0
Applications for Killing Stations
WCFF hot-spots, borders adjacent to outside sources,
& supplemental treatments in organic orchards
Bait Trees with CFF Pressure
Actara (thiamethoxam)*
+ sugar (4% or 10%)
vs.
20% GF-120
vs.
Untreated control
225 ml per tree
* NeonicotinoidApplied:
Weekly &
Biweekly
Bait Trees – WCFF Control
Treatment # larvae per 100 fruits
2010
Untreated control 1.6 a Actara + 10% sugar (weekly) 0.4 b 20% GF‐120 (weekly) 0.6 b 2011
Untreated control 3.8 ab Actara + 4% sugar (weekly) 0.2 c Actara + 4% sugar (biweekly) 0.8 bc 20% GF‐120 (weekly) 0.3 c 20% GF‐120 (biweekly) 4.2 ab
Rosy Apple Aphid
- early season pest: bloom to early summer - curl & twist leaves, distort shoots
- stunt & deform fruits
- by mid summer, migrate to weed hosts (plantain & dock)
- sporadic pest; severe injury if unchecked - neonicotinoid is primary class used for control
Flupyradifurone
¤ Sivanto 200SL
¤ Bayer CropScience
¤ new class: Butenolide
¤ stemofoline (Stemona japonica)
¤ Asia & Australasia
¤ traditional Chinese medicine
¤ nicotinic AChR agonist
¤ systemic (foliar & soil)
¤ fast uptake
¤ translaminar movement
¤ sucking insects
¤ Bloom-time applications
Methods
¤ 2-acre ‘Gala’ and ‘Fuji’ apple
¤ blocked by cultivar
¤ infested plots with RAA
¤ plot size: Single row X 3 trees
¤ RCBD, 4 replicates
¤ at least 1 untreated buffer row
between plots
¤ treatments applied once on
June 10
th¤ Apple fruitlets 1/4-1/3 inch diam
¤ Sivanto (BYI): 1.8 to 7.0 oz/acre
¤ Calypso, Admire Pro (+ 0.25% HO)
¤ orchard air blast sprayer
Aphid Sampling
¤ pre-trt & approx. weekly
for 4 wk post-trt
¤ sampled center tree per
plot
¤ two sample types:
¤ # of aphid-infested shoots
per tree
¤ RAA and GAA
¤ # of aphids & predators
per shoot for 5 infested
shoots per tree
Syrphid egg (above) and larva (courtesy of E. Beers)
Prionus Root Borer
¤ Long-horned beetle
¤ Native to western North
America
¤ trees, shrubs, vines
¤ apple, rose, lilac, oak, hop
(UT - sweet cherry, peach)
¤ females oviposit on/in soil near
base of hosts
¤ larvae feed on roots, 3-5 yr life
cycle
¤ injury - decreased nutrient uptake,
water stress, reduced growth
¤ orchards – tree decline & mortality,
reduced orchard longevity
¤ more common in sandy soils
Prionus Root Borer
¤ Few effective controls
¤ fumigation, fallow 2-3 yrs
¤ no biocontrol or HPR
¤ Adults are crepuscular
¤ Jun to Sep
¤ 1 – 2 ¼ in long
¤ males are active fliers;
highly serrate antennae
¤ Live 2-3 wk (lab), do not
feed
Prionus Pheromone
¤ ID & synthesis of
female-produced sex pheromone
¤ 3,5-dimethyldodecanoic acid
¤ MD:
¤ Pacific Biocontrol Isomate
dispenser
¤ 100 dispensers/acre
¤ single appl. (Jun 20
th) , season
longevity
¤ Lures:
¤ Contech Enterprises 30 mg
(98% pure)
Prevailing Wind
100 MD dispensers/acre Untreated
0.1 mg pheromone lure‐baited bucket trap (replace lure weekly)
Contech pheromone lure‐baited bucket trap (replace lure every 4 weeks or every 2 weeks in 1 of 2 Contech traps in 2 additional trapping orchards
Rotate lure positions on bucket traps in a clockwise direction weekly (bucket traps will remain in place and lures will be rotated)
Collect beetles from traps weekly
MD Results
Replicate % trap shutdown
1 55%
2 94%
Total 90%
Prionus californicus mating disruption in sweet cherry, UT. Male
capture in bucket traps baited with Contech (brown) pheromone
lures (2 replicate traps per orchard).
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 27 ‐ Jun 4‐Jul 11 ‐ Jul 18 ‐ Jul 25 ‐ Jul 1 ‐ Aug 8 ‐ Aug 15 ‐ Aug 22 ‐ Aug 29 ‐ Aug 5 ‐ Se p 12 ‐ Se p 19 ‐ Se p Me an # of males pe r buc ke t tr ap pe r w eek MD‐Tagge MD‐Barker Unt‐Sumida Unt‐Nielson #1 ANOVA Comparison Mean total per trap MD‐treated 1.6 b Untreated 16.0 a
Lure Comparison & Longevity Results
ANOVA Comparison Mean
total per trap 30 mg lure (brown) 3.3 a 0.1 mg lure (clear) 0.3 b 30 mg lure ‐2 wk 3.3 30 mg lure ‐4 wk 3.4
Comparison of Prionuslure type and longevity for Contech
(brown) vs. 0.1 mg (clear) lures in two sweet cherry orchards, UT
(no mating disruption).
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 27 ‐ Ju n 4 ‐ Ju l 11 ‐ Jul 18 ‐ Jul 25 ‐ Jul 1 ‐ Au g 8 ‐ Au g 15 ‐ Au g 22 ‐ Au g 29 ‐ Au g 5 ‐ Sep 12 ‐ Sep 19 ‐ Sep Me a n # of ma le s pe r buck e t tr ap pe r w eek Clear‐1 wk Brown‐2 wk Brown‐4 wk
Conclusions & Implications
Prionus Root Borer
¤ MD & mass-trapping show
promise
¤ MD: 90% trap shutdown
¤ 3-5 year life cycle: > 1 yr trt.
¤ Bucket Traps:
¤ 338 P. californicus caught in 6
sweet cherry orchards
¤ In 4 non-MD orchards:
¤
Contech 30 mg lures: 31.0
males/trap
¤
Research 0.1 mg lures: 8.1
males/trap
Problem Secondary Pests in 2011
Fruittree Leafroller
Early August
Early tart cherry
harvest
Reason:
Orchards with no or
few broad-spectrum
insecticides
Guthion, Imidan
Fruittree Leafroller
Black head & thoracic shield Front margin of thoracic shield cream to white
Reason:
Delayed phenology
in 2011 – cool weather:
larval period overlapped
with cherry harvest
History on FTLR Populations
Year # moths per trap
for summer flight
# traps Timing of peak flight
1997 0.3 7 Early July 2003 34.0 11 Late June 2004 0.1 12 Early June 2011 26.6 11 Mid to late July
Prevention:
Monitor moths
Scout leaves & fruit
Insecticides:
Synthetic pyrethroids
Sevin
Problem Secondary Pests in 2011
White Apple Leafhopper
Reasons:
Reduction in use of Sevin for apple
thinning; timing didn’t coincide
with WALH nymphs; build-up in
population cycle; other reasons?
Problem Secondary Pests in 2011
Peach Silver Mite
Reasons:
Use of synthetic pyrethroids in peach for aphids & cat-facing
insects has killed predatory mites; cooler & wetter weather
pattern; other reasons?
Acknowledgements
¤ Funding:
¤ UT Specialty Crop Block Grant Prog.
(USDA)
¤ UT State Horticultural Association
¤ UT Agricultural Experiment Station
¤ Agrichemical Industry
¤ Researchers:
¤ Cory Stanley (SWD)
¤ Wee Yee (WCFF Bait Trees)
¤ Jaime Pinero (Killing Stations)
¤ James Barbour & Michael Pace
(Prionus)
¤ Marion Murray (FTLR)
¤ Thor Lindstrom (RAA)
Grower Survey
¤ Data on impacts required by SCBG
program
¤ Feedback identifies industry priorities
¤ Feedback guides USU future research
directions
¤ Please take a few minutes to answer the
survey questions (front & back of page)
¤ Best estimates are all that is needed