Asia Study Tour – Evaluation Report
At the end of each of the two legs of the study tour, participants were asked to complete an evaluation form rating the quality of selected program and administrative aspects of the tour on a scale ranging from 1 to 5, 5 being the highest rating. The information provided is summarized in Tables 1 to 3 below. Similarly, at the end of each day of the tour, participants were asked to rate the topics dealt with during that day on the same scale. The information provided through these daily evaluations is summarized in Tables 4 and 5.
Table 1: Overall Evaluation - Singapore
Rating / Category 1 2 3 4 5 No Rating Total Number of Responses1 Administrative / Logistics2 - 1 2 17 72 1 93 Percentage - 1% 2% 18% 77% 1% 100% Program3 - - 14 55 110 7 186 Percentage - - 8% 30% 59% 4% 100% Overall Rating - - 1 8 20 2 31 Percentage4 - - 3% 28% 69% NA 100% Average5 - - - 4.66
1 The total number of responses was derived from the summation of the responses for each element under
each Category. A total of 31 participants responded to the evaluation in Singapore Leg.
2The 3 elements evaluated under ‘Administrative / Logistics’ category were Hotel Accommodation, Local Transport and Admin & Logistics Support.
3 The 6 elements evaluated under ‘Program’ category were Relevance of Program Content to your Country, Study Objectives have met your Expectation, Relevance of Site Visits, Choice of Presentation Topics, Quality of Presenters and Presentations and QA Sessions.
4 The two respondents who did not provide an overall rating have been excluded from this calculation. 5 This is a weighted average of the ratings given by each participant, using the values of the ratings on the
Table 2: Overall Evaluation - Vietnam1 Rating / Category 1 2 3 4 5 No Rating Total number of Responses2 Administrative / Logistics - - 12 34 78 2 126 Percentage - - 10% 27% 61% 2% 100% Program - 1 15 97 133 6 252 Percentage - 0.4% 6% 38.5% 52.7% 2.4% 100% Overall Rating - - - 17 25 - 42 Percentage - - - 40% 60% - 100% Overall Average Rating - - - - 4.6 Evaluation Findings
:
The data collected through the evaluation forms show that the participants rated the Asia Study Tour very highly:
• 69% of the participants gave the Singapore leg of the tour the top rating of “5” and 28% rated it “4”. 60% of the participants rated the Vietnam leg “5”and 40% rated it “4”.
• The average rating was 4.66 for the Singapore leg and 4.60 for the Vietnam leg.
Common feedback provided by the respondents when asked for comments were:
Singapore Leg
:
1 On the question on which 2 topics the respondents found most interesting and relevant, feedback and comments were as follows:
• The model used by TVET institutions to link up with the labor market/
industry / economy: 16%
2 Some suggestions for improvement were:
- To include visit to primary school and secondary school;
- To include interaction with lecturers and students during site visit to institutions;
- To allow more time for in-depth discussion and study of certain topics; - To allow more time for Q&A
Vietnam Leg:
1 On the question on which 2 topics the respondent have found most interesting and relevant, feedback and comments were as follows:
- Primary Teachers’ Professional Profile: 26% - Developing a Sustainable Textbook System: 24% - TVET Visit: 14%.
2 Some suggestions for improvement were:
a. To extend the Q&A session so as to encourage more conclusive exchange of experience and ideas with the Vietnamese counterpart;
b. To include visit to secondary and primary school; c. To go into in-depth discussion on certain topics.
Tables 3: Comparison of WB and African Delegate Rating
Rating / Category 1 2 3 4 5 Total
WB Respondent Overall Rating in % - - 8% 33% 58% 100% WB Average Rating - - - - - 4.46 Africa Delegate Respondent Overall Rating in % - - - 23% 77% 100% Singapore African Average Rating - - - - - 4.77 WB Respondent Overall Rating in % - - - 80% 20% 100% WB Average Rating - - - - - 4.2 Africa Delegate Respondent Overall Rating in % - - - 27% 73% 100% Vietnam African Average Rating - - - - - 4.73 Evaluation Findings:
1 From the data collected from the evaluation forms, while World Bank staff also gave the tour excellent ratings, their rating were slightly lower than those of the African participants.
•
The World Bank participants average rating was 4.46 and 4.2 for Singapore and Vietnam Leg respectivelyTable 4: Evaluation of the Individual Day Rating – Vietnam Leg
Discussion Topics
Rating
1
2
3
4
5
Total
Rating -
-
3
18
15
-
Percentage
- - 8 50
42 -
Challenges of
Educational
Development in
Africa
Average - - - 4.34
Rating -
-
2
15
19
-
Percentage - - 5 42
53 -
Overview of
Education in Vietnam
Average - - - 4.48
Rating -
-
4
16
16
-
Percentage - - 12
44
44 -
Vietnam’s EFA
Successes and
Challenges
Average - - - 4.32
Rating -
-
11
18
5
-
Percentage - - 31
50
13.9 -
Panel Discussion –
Vietnam’s
Experiences and its
Relevance to Africa
Average - - - 3.63
Rating -
-
3
21
9
-
Percentage - - 9 64
27 -
Teacher Development
– Professional
Development
Average - - - 4.18
Rating -
1
8
23
2
-
Percentage - 3 24
70 6 -
Student Assessments
(Asian and Other
International
Experience)
Average - - - 3.88
Rating -
-
4
21
9
-
Percentage - - 12
64
27 -
Student Assessments
(Vietnam Experience)
Average - - - 4.27
Rating -
-
5
13
15
-
Percentage - - 15
39
46 -
Vietnam Textbook
Program (Publication,
Distribution and
Finance)
Average - - - 4.31
Rating -
2
9
7
11
-
Percentage - 6 27
21
33 -
Visit to textbook
publication facilities
Average - - - 4.05
Discussion Topics
1
2
3
4
5
Total
Rating -
1
5
14
13
-
Percentage - 3 15 42 39 -
Development of
Lower and upper
Secondary Education
Average -
-
-
-
-
4.14
Rating -
-
5
15
12
-
Percentage - - 15 46 36 -
Education Financing
in Vietnam
Average -
-
-
-
-
4.09
Rating -
-
-
8
10
-
Percentage - - - 44 55 -
Site Visits
Average -
-
-
-
-
4.51
Average Rating
14.18
Table 5: Evaluation of the Individual Day Rating – Singapore Leg
Discussion Topics
Rating
1
2
3
4
5
Total
Rating -
-
16
20
7
-
Percentage
- - 37
47
16 -
Education Challenges
in Africa Overview
and Country
Perspectives
Average - - - 3.79
Rating -
-
1
11
31
-
Percentage - - 2 26
72 -
Development of
Education in
Singapore since
Independence
Average - - - 4.7
Rating -
-
5
16
22
-
Percentage - - 12
37
51 -
Strategic Management
of Education
Development in
Singapore
Average - - - 4.39
Rating -
-
2
19
19
-
Percentage - - 5 44
44 -
Singapore’s
Experience in
Education over 40
Years
Average - - - 4.11
Rating -
-
2
18
25
-
Percentage - - 5 44
44 -
Singapore Teachers’
pre-service Training
and Professional
Development
Average - - - 4.47
Rating -
3
9
22
12
-
Percentage - 6
19.6
48
26 -
Curriculum
Development and
Textbooks in
Singapore
Average - - - 3.93
Rating
- - 3 15
28 -
Percentage - - 7 33
61 -
ICT Masterplanning
for Education:
Singapore’s
Experience
Average - - - 4.58
Rating
- - 4 23
19 -
Percentage - - 9 50
41 -
ICTs Serving
Educational Needs in
Rural Areas: China’s
Experience
Average - - - 4.32
Rating -
-
-
16
24
-
Percentage - - - 40
60 -
Education for Growth:
Korea’s Experience
Discussion Topics
Rating
1
2
3
4
5
Total
Rating -
-
6
15
19
-
Percentage
- - 15
38
48 -
Site Visit to ITE
Balestier Campus
Average - - - 4.37
Rating -
-
6
34
-
Percentage - - - 15
85 -
Thailand’s Experience
in addressing the
challenges of
Secondary Education
Development
Average - - - 4.85
Rating -
-
2
14
23
-
Percentage - - 5 36
59 -
Technical and
Vocational Training in
Singapore
Average - - - 4.54
Rating -
-
-
5
34
-
Percentage - - - 13
87 -
Education for
Tomorrow
Average - - - 4.87
Rating -
-
-
13
26
-
Percentage - - - 33
67 -
Tertiary and
University Education
in the Last 40 Years
Average - - - 4.67
Rating -
2
9
18
10
-
Percentage - 5 23
46
26 -
Textbook
Development in
Singapore
Average - - - 3.93
Rating
- - 3 16
20 -
Percentage - - 8 41
51 -
Site Visit to ITE
College East Simei
Average - - - 4.43
Rating
- - 1 5 26 -
Percentage - - 3 16
81 -
-
Site Visit to Nanyang
Rating
- - - 7 25 -
Percentage - - - 21
78 -
Polytechnic Education
Singapore’s
Experience
Average - - - 4.74
Average Rating
14.45
From the data collected from the daily feedback forms, the participants gave the Vietnam leg of the tour an average rating of 4.18 and the Singapore leg of the tour an average rating of 4.45 in terms of individual topics selected and content delivered in both legs of the tour.
We can conclude that on the whole, the topics selected and the content presented for both legs of the tour by the speakers were rated highly relevant and useful for the participants. We also noted that some participants have reflected in the daily evaluation form that certain topics were not that relevant to them. It is important to note that this arose because the background of the participants was varied where some were involved in supervising TVET, some in primary education, some in secondary education and others in higher education. Since this study tour covers a wide spectrum of the education field, it is inevitable that some topics were more relevant and others were less relevant to the participants.
It is interesting to note that generally, topics on education development and visit to institutions have been rated highly by the participants. For example, the topics on
Development of Education in Singapore since Independence, Education for Growth: Korea’s Experience over 40 years and Thailand’s Experience in addressing the Challenges of Secondary Education Development have all been rated highly by the
participants.
As a follow up to this study tour and arising from the feedback from the participants through the evaluation forms, we could select topics that participants have indicated strong interest in and do an in-depth study on these topics for future study tour.
1 See footnotes on Table 4.