• No results found

Scalable Frequency Generation from Single Optical Wave

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Scalable Frequency Generation from Single Optical Wave"

Copied!
33
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

Scalable Frequency Generation from 

Single Optical Wave

S. Radic

Jacobs School Of Engineering

Qualcomm Institute

(2)

- Motivation

- Bandwidth Engineering

- Noise Inhibition and Coherency Limit

- Spectral Shaping

- Implications:

- Optical

(3)

AW

G

RX

RX

RX

RX

1

2

3

N

2xN

N Channels

RX

RX

RX

AW

G

RX

1

2

3

N

(4)

Physical Parameter

ITLA

F-Generation

Spectral Coverage (nm)

74

?

Power (dBm)

7-15.5

?

RIN (dBc/Hz)

-145

?

OSNR

0.1 nm

(dB)

>50

?

f (MHz)

0.1

?

F-stability (GHz)

±1.5 (±3.0)

?

Power Dissipation (W)

3.5-7.0

?

Carrier Generation

(5)

Conventional LD Array

f

Frequency Comb

dBm-level Optical Power OSNR > 40 dB

Multi-band Wavelength Range

MHz Linewidth

Individual Frequency Tracking Required kW/MW-level Power Dissipation

Output Power? OSNR?

Emission Bandwidth and Spacing? Linewidth?

Frequency Grid Locked

Watt-scale Power Dissipation

LD/TEC

LD/TEC

LD/TEC

LD/TEC

LD/TEC

(6)

Mode-Locked Lasers

- Cavity-defined

- Fixed grid,

f, bandwidth limits

- Low harmonic power

- Excess noise

E/O Modulation

- Grid limited by RF generator

- Noise defined by front loss

Resonant Generation

-

Noise, Power

 P ~f-1 t PM AM f1 PM AM f2 f3 f4

(7)

f f0 f0+ Ideal Lasers (Narrow Linewidth)

Mixer

f f0 f0+ f0+2 f0+3 f0+n

Advantage: No cavity

 freely tunable.

Disadvantage: No cavity means no inhibition mechanism.

- Noise introduced and grown by mixer.

(8)

Mixer efficiency

- ratio of newly created and input photons:

Figure Of Merit (FOM)

2

~

e

PL

Kerr Index (n2) W-1m-1 Effective Waveguide Area (Aeff) m2 Nonlinearity (=2n2/Aeff) Loss dB/m Effective Length (m) FOM PL) Silicon Waveguide Silica Waveguide 2.1×10-18 3.2×10-20 8.3 0.035 0.6 8 500 0.00035 0.03 >1000 0.5 70 Mixer Platform

(9)

Pulsed vs. Continuous-Wave Generation

CW-seeding is low power  Requires higher mixing efficiency

f f

P

CW

Mixer

Two-Tone CW

t

Mixer

f

P

ML

Mode-Locked Seed

(10)

CW-Seeded Frequency Generation Efficiency

t ω Dispersion-less Nonlinear Medium t ω

Efficiency Limit set by SBS Threshold

21 eff SBS B A P g L  2 1 42 1 SBS SBS B k P L n g           0.14 1

for ordinary silica fiber

2.81 1

for SBS-suppressed mixer

Modified Carson’s Rule for HPM

0 10 20 30 40 50 0 10 20 30 40 50 60

Phase rotation parameter m

T

one o

rder

k

Highest tone order

1

kPL

High-Count generation is prohibited

in homogeneous mixers

(11)

Higher-order mixing efficiency proportional to Peak Power P

peak t ω Dispersion-less Nonlinear Medium t ω Δω Ppeak

(12)

Shock-Wave Mixer

t t   Pulse Compression

Stage Mixing Stage

Nonlinear Section 1 Linear Section Nonlinear Section 2 t

(13)

1450 1500 1550 1600 1650 -60 -50 -40 -30 -20 -10 0 Wavelength, nm Po w e r, d B m Fiber 6-2-6 200m Fiber 6-2-7 250m Fiber 6-2-8 250m

(14)

z

D(z), r(z)

~nm

1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800 -2 -1.5 -1 -0.5 0 0.5 1 Wavelength, nm D is pers io n , ps /n m /k m

(15)

Dpeak = 0.0 ps/nm/km Dpeak = -0.2 ps/nm/km Dpeak= -0.4 ps/nm/km

Dpeak = 0.4 ps/nm/km

(16)

Beyond Stochastic Barrier

1520 1540 1560 1580 1600 1620 1640 -0.8 -0.6 -0.4 -0.2 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 Wavelength, nm D isp e rsi o n , p s /n m /k m

Standard

Synthetic

(17)

Stochastic Barrier

1300 1350 1400 1450 1500 1550 1600 1650 1700 1750 1800 -70 -60 -50 -40 -30 -20 -10

Before Synthesis

1400 1450 1500 1550 1600 1650 1700 -70 -60 -50 -40 -30 -20 -10 Walelength, nm Po w e r, d B m

After Synthesis

(18)

-40 -20 0 1500 1520 1540 1560 1580 1600 1620Wavelength (nm)Relative P ower (dB) -70 -60 -50 -40 -30 -20 -10 0 10 1590 1592 1594 1596 1598 1600

(19)

- Motivation

- Bandwidth Engineering

- Noise Inhibition and Coherency Limit

- Spectral Shaping

- Implications:

- Optical

(20)

Noise Origins

Mixer

Excess Mixer Noise

(21)

Mixer Linewidth  f f0 f0+ f f0 f0+ f0+2 f0+3 f0+n  2 3 n f f0 f0+ Ideal Lasers (Narrow Linewidth)

Finite Linewidth Laser ()

f

f0 f0+ f0+2 f0+3 f0+n

Mixer

Finite-Linewidth Laser Seed

(22)

Phase-Referencing by Injection Locking

Master

Slave

Weak, narrow master;

Strong, broad slave;

Injection locking results in

strong, narrow oscillator.

(23)

-2 -1 0 1 2 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 Frequency (MHz) A m plit ude RIO C33 1st line 5th line 10th line 15th line 20th line 25th line 30th line

Spectral Fidelity

• Linewidth broadens quadratically

with comb tone order

• At low copy count there is also

the linear contribution to

linewidth scaling law

Span 5 MHz

0 10 20 30 40 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 Comb line L ine widt h F W HM ( k Hz

) Measurement2nd order polynomial fit

Normalized

(24)

In Phase Quadrature In Phase Quadrature

ITLA

COMB

-40 -20 0 1500 1520 1540 1560 1580 1600 1620Wavelength (nm)Relative P ower (dB)

Comb

(25)

- Motivation

- Bandwidth Engineering

- Noise Inhibition and Coherency Limit

- Spectral Shaping

- Implications:

- Optical

(26)

 Uses CW, rather than pulsed seed: achieves generation

efficiency by managed shock-wave formation.

 Tunable frequency grid: from

10 GHz

to >

400 GHz

.

 Requires precise intra-mixer waveform control.

Shock-Wave Parametric Mixer

Dispersive stage Nonlinear stage f f t t PM AM 2 Δf Nonlinear stage f Δf

Carrier Generation

(27)

f

Δf

 Pedestal pulses may form at high compression ratio

Introduces spectral power ripple…

 Regenerative stage reshapes pulses into ideal form

 Active loop improves extinction by >

100-times

Inter-stage Shock-wave Shaping

Dispersive element NOLM Nonlinear element PM AM 2 t P out Pin t Δf Δf f

Carrier Generation

(28)

Setup

AM 2 10 GHz -4 -2 0 2 4 0 0.5 1 Time [ps] Amplitude SMF1 -4 -2 0 2 4 0 0.5 1 Time [ps] SMF3 185 190 195 200 205 -80 -70 -60 -50 -40 -30 Frequency [THz] HNLF PM 185 190 195 200 205 -80 -70 -60 -50 -40 -30 Frequency [THz] Power [dB] 0.4 THz 185 190 195 200 205 -80 -70 -60 -50 -40 -30 Frequency [THz] -4 -2 0 2 4 0 0.5 1 Time [ps] NOLM1 1 THz NOLM2 185 190 195 200 205 -80 -70 -60 -50 -40 -30 Frequency [THz] 2 THz -4 -2 0 2 4 0 0.5 1 Time [ps] SMF2

(29)

Very Dense Carrier Plan (10 GHz)

195.95 196 196.05 -60 -40 -20 0 Frequency [THz] 192.92 192.96 193 -60 -40 -20 0 Frequency [THz] P o w e r [dB] 194.95 195 195.05 -60 -40 -20 0 Frequency [THz] <2 dB 1460 1500 1540 1580 1620 -80 -70 -60 -50 -40 -30 Wavelength [nm] Po w e r [ d B ]

>1500 lines

Carrier Generation

(30)

- Motivation

- Bandwidth Engineering

- Noise Inhibition and Coherency Limit

- Spectral Shaping

- Implications:

- Optical

(31)
(32)

189

191

193

195

197

0

2

6

10

14

18

Frequency (THz)

NF (dB)

PS-Multicasting PI-Multicasting 5.6 dB NF Improvement 3-dB Quantum Limit

“Isotropic” Mixer

(33)

-42 -40 -38 -36 -34 -32 -30 -10 -9 -8 -7 -6 -5 -4 Input Power [dBm] log (BER)

EDFA

PI-scheme

PS-scheme

2.0 dB

References

Related documents

Given a category in which the entity is expected to be in- cluded, we use existing Wikipedia articles in this category to extract query patterns so that, when used together with

In conforming with the targeted employment goals, the contractor or subcontractor agrees to review all procedures relating to transfer, upgrading, downgrading and layoff to

The reduction and absence of chlorine concentration in the last parts of distribution network are due to a number of factors like chlorine volatilization in

The Stormwater Management Utility Fee (SWMUFs) provides a sustainable and dedicated source of revenue for controlling, continuing, and improving the physical infrastructure of

It combines the advantages of circuit switching (constant transmission delay, guaran- teed capacity) with those of packet switching (exibility and ecient transmission of bursty trac

In this dissertation, we study the asymptotic properties of pretest and shrinkage estimators of the large-scale effect in some spatial regression models, and compare their

perceptions of former W. King School graduates, and four findings were discovered from the perceptions of former W. King students who, because of integration, graduated from

Crank shaft is a large component with a complex geometry in the engine, which converts the reciprocating displacement of the piston to a rotary motion with a