• No results found

Dynamic Model of a Continuous Cold Rolling Mill

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Dynamic Model of a Continuous Cold Rolling Mill"

Copied!
45
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

K 3 * COORDINATED SCIEN CE LABORATORY

DYNAMIC MODEL

OF A CONTINUOUS

COLD ROLLING MILL

M. J A M S H I D I R K 0 K 0 T 0 V I C '

U N IVERSITY OF ILLIN O IS - URBANA, ILLIN O IS

(2)

by

M. Jamshidi and P. Kokotovic

This work was supported in part by the Joint Services Electronics Program (U.S. Army, U.S. Navy, U.S. Air Force) under Contract DAAB-07- 67-C-0199; also in part by the U. S. Air Force under Grant AFOSR 68-1579A; and also in part the Alcoa Foundation.

Reproduction in whole or in part is permitted for any purpose of the United States Government.

This document has been approved for public release and sale; its distribution is unlimited

(3)

by

M. Jarnshidi and P. Kokotovic

Abstract

The dynamic model of a continuous cold reduction mill is developed. The model makes use of the force=torque equation expansion technique developed in an e a r lie r report and presents the generalized (7N+8)th order state equation

for an N-stand ro llin g m ill. The equations of inter stand tensions are found

to be highly nonlinear with the arguments delayed due to the transition of strip

between the stands. The model developed can be used in the design of a

(4)

The authors are thankful to Mrs. Sandra Bowles, Mrs. Barbara Champagne, Mrs. Sherry Kallembach, Mrs. Rose Lane, and Mrs. Nicola S t illin g s for their

(5)

I. INTRODUCTION

In this report a nonlinear model of an N-stand ro llin g m ill is

developed. The model represents an improvement on previously proposed

models [1 ,2 ].

Figure 1 shows an N-stand m ill presented with c o ile r , decoiler, r o l l screw-down and drive motors.

As seen, the decoiler feeds the strip into the f i r s t stand where i t s thickness is reduced by a combination of interstand tension

and r o l l separating force. The r o lls of each stand are driven by a dc-

motor which in turn is connected to i t s generator. The generators, the

c ircu it breakers and emergency stopping circuits are not shown for

simplicity of the diagram [3 ]. The drive motors can be controlled

by both armature and f i e l d , while the screwdown motors are only armature controlled.

The model developed in this report w i l l be used in the design

of a controller for the r o llin g process. Each stand, c o ile r and decoiler

are considered as dynamic subsystems coupled by an e la stic s trip . In

general the coupled model is nonlinear and it s order is high. Conse­

quently, straight forward applications of optimal control theory would be v ir t u a lly impossible and some approximation methods are needed. The development of this npdel takes into consideration properties of a

class of near optimum design methods. In p articu lar, i t is adapted for

an application of singular perturbation [4 - 6 ], decoupling methods [7 ], three time scale design method [8] and design of systems with time

(6)
(7)

Figure 1, remains general in it s mechanical subsystems and formulation of

state equations for the m ill in interstand variables. The N-stand m ill

system of Figure 1 is divided into two major subsystems: mechanical

and e le c t r ic a l.

2. MECHANICAL SUBSYSTEM

A b r i e f review of ro llin g theory w i l l explain the deformation process, interstand relations and other r o llin g equations relatin g m ill process variables such as thickness, tension, torque, force, and

coefficients of fric tio n . Appendix 1 presents the notation and nomen­

clature for the entire report. 2.1 Deformation Process

In general, there is no "exact" r o llin g theory presented in

the lite ra tu re . The "exactness" of a r o llin g theory depends on assump­

tions involved. Thus fa r , the theory of Orowan [13] is most "exact".

I t permits variation of both yield stress and coefficient of fric tio n .

Xt is furthermore useful for both cold and hot strip r o llin g . Orowan’ s

theory has been extended by Finne, et a l [14]. However, due to it s

complexity, this theory is approximated by Bland and Ford [15].

The theory of Bland and Ford is used throughout our analysis. Using this theory several authors have developed graphical techniques and it e r a t iv e methods for computations of force and torque to be

applied to the r o lls during the process [1,2,16-20]. In an e a r lie r

report we developed a computational procedure for determining the coefficients of a three-term Taylor series expansion of ro llin g

(8)

force and torque [21].

The deformation of strip takes place at each stand's r o l l gap. A r o l l gap configuration is shown in Figure 2.

(9)

As seen the arc of contact is divided into three segments: A is the e la stic arc at the entry.

B is the p la s t ic arc.

C is the e la s tic recovery arc at the e xit.

In the two e la s tic regions the fr ic t io n a l force exerted by the r o l l s to the strip is commonly assumed to [13-15] be proportional to r o l l pressure with

proportionality being the coefficient of f r ic t io n . I t is in these two

regions where the r o llin g metal is said to be "s lip p in g ” [13-20]. In

region B, however, the fr ic t io n a l force increases up to the magnitude of the y ield stress in shear and a p la stic shear occurs in the metal. The surface of the r o llin g metal is then said to be "sticking" to the

r o lls [13]. One of the basic assumptions made in [13] is that the

deformation in the p la s tic region is a "homogeneous compression", i . e . the strip is divided into a number of v e r t ic a l segments which remain

plane and perpendicular to the direction of r o llin g . Three of these

planes are shown in Figure 2. As seen from this figu re, in the neighbor­

hood of the entry plane these v e rtic a l segments (Planes) are "squeezed backward" while close to the exit plane they are "squeezed forward". In the middle of the gap there is a segment where the strip is being

pulled out to i t s right and pushed back to it s l e f t . Such a segment

is called the "neutral plane" [13,20].

The r o llin g theory of Bland and Ford calculates r o l l force and torque items of the "m ill v a ria b le s ", h ., h , t . , t , and y,

1 o 1 o

F = F(h. , h , t . , t , y)

(10)

t = t(h ± , hQ, t± , t Q, y) . (2.2) As i t w i l l become clear later a third equation for the neutral point thickness, h^ (See Figure 2) is also required.

h = h ( h . , h , t . , t , y)

n n i o ’ l* o ’ (2.3)

Analytic expressions for (2.1, 2 and 3) developed by Bland and Ford are given in Appendix 2.

These expressions are complicated nonlinear functions of m ill

variables and a simplification of their calculation is needed. In [18]

a graphical method was proposed. Some computer ite ra tiv e methods have

been suggested [1 ,2 ], where small (1%) incremental changes of different m ill variables are made to perform linearization of the force-torque

equations. A computationally simpler and in the same time more accurate

approximation is given in [21] where 2.1, 2 and 3 are expanded using

e x p lic it d ifferen tiation . The truncated series are

F = (k ,q ) + ( q ,Kq) (2.4)

f = (4,q> + ( q , Lq> (2.5)

‘n = <m,q> + ( q , Mq ) (2.6)

where q is a vector with the mill variables as its components

Tj r- ^ /v a ^ n

q = Lh. h t . t mJ ,

(11)

k is a 5X1 normalized vector, k. = ^—

* l F oq, i = 1 , . . . 5 and K is a 5X5

symmetric matrix whose elements are, k „ = —

q* q^*

i 1 ô2F

F* dq. dq.

i J

Similar

definitions apply for i , L, m, and M for (2.5) and (2 .6 ). The computational

scheme developed in [ 2 l ] consists of two main subroutines which allows a l l the mill coefficients to be obtained in less than 20 seconds on a CDC-1604 computer.

A common assumption in a l l r o llin g theories is that the volume of the material per unit time passing through each v e r t ic a l segment is constant, i . e .

v. h. = . . . . = v h = . . . . = v h

i l n n o o (2.8)

2,2. Stand Relations

The output tension of the jth stand is assumed to be equal to the input tension of the ( j+1) th stand, i . e .

t . - (t) = t . (t) .

i , J + l oj (2.9)

The output tension is related to the strip velocity by the e la s t ic it y principle (Hook's law) [22-24],

‘ oj ■ T <v i , j + l - vo ; j ) (2.10)

where it is assumed that the delay time T (tran sit time between stands j

and j+1) is constant [ l 4 , 1 8 ] . The input thickens at the (j+1)th stand is the

(12)

= h . (t -1 ) .

o,J (2.11)

As noted before when force is applied to the r o l l s an e la stic deformation occurs to the "m ill housing" and the r o l l s , i . e . the entire structure (stand and its four highs) is considered to be a s t i f f spring with a

modulus of e la s t ic it y (spring constant) M [1 ,2 ,2 5 ]. Thus,

F.

J (2.12)

where is the screw-down setting (separation of r o l l s during r o llin g ,

positive upward) of the jth stand and S . is the screw-down setting when

°> J

Fj = 0. I f the e lastic recovery of the metal is neglected as in the case in

Bland and Ford's theory [1,2,15,25] then the output thickness h . = S. and

°> J J

(2.12) in incremental form becomes [

2

] ,

(13)

3. ELECTRICAL SUBSYSTEM

The e le c tric a l subsystem consists of the control r e c t i f i e r motor groups for c o ile r, decoiler, stands, drives, and screw-down servomechanisms. In order to preserve generolity, our model is derived with the assumption

that the armature voltages of the motors are control variables. In a

solution of an optimum control problem the dynamics of the generators or

rectifiers w i l l have to be included, and the motor armature voltages w i l l

become state variables.

In this section the dynamic equations of motors are given. A

block diagram of both mechanical and e le c t r ic a l subsystems shows the in te r­ connection between process variables.

3.1 Coiler and Decoiler

The coiler and decoiler are driven by a dc motor which is con­ trolled by both armature and f ie ld voltages.

strip

c

(14)

The torque equation at the c o i l e r ’ s shaft, Figure 3, is [23,26]

where the term J c

(oo

c

St = t = Jd) + J ( u ) - 0) ) + B u) H— ■ r t __ (3 ,1 )

c c c c s c c c n c oN

U)^) accounts for the fact that the inertia of

the c o ile r, Jc , is a time-varying function [27-29], The term u>c -

is the magnitude of the angular velocity of incoming strip re la tiv e to

that of the c o ile r. The remaining relationships for the system in

Fig, 3 are T C = Kl c 0c iac = R i + L ac ac ac a 1 f c = Rfc i „f c + Nfc r c h oN 2n 00c di d0( + K ao DC C fc Cl 0c + C30c J ( r ) = J + ^ JT = J + npW r 4 c c m 2 L m 0 2 r c n Zn and B = B + ~ BT , c m 2 ^ n

A l l the quantities are defined in the nomenclature (Appendix 1), A similar set of equations can be written for decoiler by

interchanging subscripts c (c o i l e r ) to d (decoiler) and N to 1, For

example, as an equivalent to 3,1 one obtains,

St = Td = J i d + Jd <«»]_ - u>d) + BdU)d - l r t (3.2) (3.3) (3.4) (3.5) (3.6) (3.7) (3.8) where xd = Kld0di ad, etc

(15)

Note that a nonlinear magnitization relation, (3.6) is assumed between the f i e ld current and the flux of the motors.

3.2 Main Drive

The torque, armature and fie ld c ircu it ^equations for the jth stand

are presented. The stand's drive motor must provide torque su ffic ie n t to

balance frictions ro llin g torque, torque caused by inlet tension and the

acceleration torque. The torque caused by outlet tension is helping the

r o lls to rotate in the prescribed directions. Thus,

where t^j o, f , i , j indicate the torque of motor, outlet tension, f r ic t io n ,

inlet tension, and jth r o l l s , respectively. Equation (3.9) can be written

for the jth stand as

Et = t + t - J - t , - t . - t. = 0 m o tu f i j (3.9) t . = Jd). + Bcjd. + ~ Rt. . = — Rt . + t. mj J j n i j n o j j (3.10) where, (3.11) The armature and fie ld currents are governed by,

(3.12)

(3.13) The fie ld current-flux are related by the familiar magnitization charac­

t e r is t ic approximated by third order polynomial,

(3.14) Thus three variables, u)., i . , and 0; are sufficient for a state space

J aJ v

(16)

3,3 Screw-Down

The screw-down motors are assumed to be of the armature-

controlled direct current type. The task of these motors is the

adjustment of the vertical position of r o l l s (settings or screw

pitch) [3 0 ], The equations for the jth stand screw-down motor are,

(3.15)

(3.16)

(3.17)

and the screw speed is assumed to be directly proportional to the angular velocity of the motor,

t . - J cb . + B a) . sj s sj s sj t . = K. 0 . i . Sj 1 sj a s j d ( i .) e . — R i . + L l~" ~l "3' * + K, cu asj a asj d t b sj S . ° J (3,18)

where S . is the screw pitch of the ith stand r o l l s ,

oj J

3,4 M ill Block Diagram

The mechanical and e le c tric a l subsystems for the jth

stand can be shown in a general block diagram as in Fig, 4, Note

that for j = 1 and N, the diagram involves the decoiler or coiler motors, respectively and are considered as special cases of this diagram.

(17)
(18)

Table 1 shows a possible selection of state, control and output

variables of the system of Figures 1,2. For a single stand r o l l i n g m ill,

i . e . , j = N = 1 there may be as many as 7 + 8 = 15 state variables, 3 + 4 = 7 control variables and 2 output variables.

Let x. . = (JD . J x 0 . = t 2j Oj x 0 . = i . 3j aj x. . = 0 . 4j x r . = U) . 5j s j x . . = S 6j Oj x_ . = i 7j as j u. . = e . ! j a J u0 . = e 2j f J u_ . = e 3 j as j (4.1)

Considering (2.4) and rewrite it as:

f j = <k>qj ) + ( q j- K q?

= k00 iin . + (k0 + k10 ii. + k0 t . . + k0 p. .) ii .

22 Oj 2 12 lg 23 i j 25 y aj

+ ( k ,q j) + <qy K q (4.2)

where

k = Ik, K = IK, I = diag [ l 0 1 1 l ] ,

(19)

Table 1

System Variables in an N-Stand Rolling M ill Stand j Total no. of Variables Type of Variable Roll

Gap Drive Motor Screw-Down

Decoiler Coiler

State

*0 j (JO. J j i a J . ’ 6 .J (10 s j’ .S-*, i Oj aSj U)di o’d0dr d (jo? i c ac c c> (t>> r 7N + 8

Control e .. e , . f j eas . J ead',ef d e 9 0. . ac f c 3N + 4 Output fl , OJ t . OJ - - - - 2N

(20)

the subscript has been omitted on them for Simplicity-

Eliminating ft from (4.2) and (2 .1 3 ),

P j k22^0j + ^ j (k2 + k12^ih + k23^ij + k24^0j + k2 ^ V

-1] + (<*jS0j + p . <is>qj) + 3 j ( q j ^ q ^ ) ) =

where O'. = ( ^ —) , 3. = (F ./Mb-.) as defined in (2.13).

J n0 j J A J J

Solving for h^ from the above and considering (2

notations of (4 .1 ),

R0j =

a. .o . x 3 J 2, j-1 . . + a. .x 4j 2j - + 7] 2. (t - T ) + a_ . 5j

where, a _ , i = 3,4,5 and Tj^(t-T) are defined in Appendix 3. Similarly torque and thickness equations of (2.5)

after the substitution of . from (4.3) can be rewritten as

Oj

t . = b x . + b x + 0 . (t - T ) + b

J 3 j 2, j - 1 4j 2 j 5 j

b ^ , i = 3,4,5 and 0 ^ (t-T ) are expressed in Appendix 3 Similarly 2.6 can be reduced to,

fi . = C x . - + C. .x + i|r . (t - T ) + C,. .

nJ 3j 2 , j-1 4j 2j Yj v 5j

where C ., n = 3,4,5 and \lf . have expressions identical with

nj TJ

and 0^ when replacing & and L by m and M, respectively.

9) and (4.3) and (2.6) (4.4) (4.5) b ., n = 3,4,5 nj

(21)

To derive the f i r s t state equation let us write the torque

equation at the shaft of the stand drive motor,

J cl). = -Bud. + K. i .0 . - — A . . t . . + — , t .

J J 1 a J J n i j i j n o j

1 * * 1 * -k *

- T . T . - —( R ( t . . - tA .) + X .)

n J J i j Oj7 y (4.6)

Substituting for % from (4»7)

B 1 * x, . = " T x - — (b X . + RA. .) x. . . l j J J n 3 j j i j ' 2 , j - 1 — (b . r . - RAn .)x 0 . — 0 . - dn . Jn 4j j 0 j 7 2j Jn l j (4.7) where d. . = — (R (t. 4 - t n .) + (b .+1) t .) l j Jn i j Oj7 v 5j 7 j 7 (4.8)

To drive the state quantum for t ^ , consider equations ( 2 . 8 ), (2 .10), and (2.11), Vi>j+1 - 1 H----V3? i* j+1 = -1 + V n, 1+1 1 h n , j + l1 h. . Vi, j + 1 “ i , j+1 Rh* ... U).,.(fi + 1) n, .1+1 1+1 n, i+l v* - L h ( t L . ( t - T ) + 1) i , J + l i , J + l 0 j v -1 + (4.9)

(22)

Sim ilarly, + Rh .h J 9T~ oj CJU . (ft .+1)

• jrf-

oj

+ 1)

(4.10) then by (2.10) *2 j = ^2j ( —*—( t_T) »—( t_2T) ) (4.11)

where is defined in Appendix 3. Note that by x in (4.11) it is meant a

I

vector containing a l l state variables as defined by (4 .1 ).

The remaining state equations are simple and are written accord­ ing to (3.12-18). Ra Kb , 1 LaX3.j L Xl j a J L Ulja J V i Rf e3 3 . 1 Nf v4j Nf x. . + 4j Nf B K. s . i s 5J " “ Js X5j Js X7j (4.12) (4.13) (4.14) -K x s 5j (4.15) R as L as as 5j (4.16)

Thus 4.7, 4.11, 4.12 to 4.16 are Severn s t a t e equations d e s c r i b i n g the

th

dynamics of the j stand. In addition to the above, eight other equations

(23)

let

M = 7N, N is the number of stands in the r o lli n g m ill in s t a l­ lation, and .1er : C o i le r : XM+1 = “ a XM+5 = (JOc XM+2 Lad XM+6 Lac XM+3 XM+7 K XM+4 r d XM+8 = rc i

U2N+1 = ®ad U3N+3 = eac

U3N+2 CD

II

U3N+4 = e, f c

(4.17)

The corresponding state equations are,

M+l * XM+4X11 *M+1 Bd Jd(x) 2WPhi j Jd(x) 2 3 , XM+lXM+4 , i l XM+4XM+5 + 2Wph . . ■_ ~ t---- + i l Jd (x) n Jd (x) + K XM+2XW-3 Id Jd (x ) (4.18) where J(x) Jm + 2 TTpWxM+4 2n R , K, , . _ ad bd , 1 ^ + 2 "L , XM+2 L , XM+1 L , U3N+1 ad ad ad (4.19)

(24)

Rf dl Rfdd3 3 1 XM+3 N , , XM+3 " N£j XM+3 + N£J U3N+2 rd rd fd i l ^ + 4 2tt XM+1 ^ + 5 3 CM+5 , * XM+8XN . = - B x + 2Wph „ —i—r~r + c J (x) c oN J (x) c 2 3 „„ , * XM+5XM+8 ON XM+8X2N , TT XM+8XM+7 2Wph .. ■_ r~ — - — ---mi 1 j \ + K, oN J (x) c n J (x) c lc J (x)c when 1 4 J (x) = J H---x npWx..,0 c v ' m _ 2 M+8 2n R ac K M+6 be 1 X_, + T---- u. L M+6 L M+5 L 3N+3 ac ac ac Rr C fc 1 Rfc C3 XM+7 Nr aM+7 f c Nfc U3N+3 Rfc Cl R fc 3r C 3 XM+7 = N, XM+7 fc N, f c XM+7 ' 'fc = _oN XM+8 2tt XM+5 (4.20) (4.21) (4.22) (4.23) (4.23) (4.24) (4.25)

The above equations as w e ll as those for the j stand can now

be written in a vector form for an N- stand r o llin g mill as follows, Let

(25)

x X1

xn

ui U1 x2 X21 u2 0 S tand 1 0 u3 « X71 U3 O • • • • 0 • * . = x . J u = St u . J X2j Stand j U2j K7j _ *3 j _ • %f • » » # o o « X1N "n ° X2N Stand N U2N X7N _ ^3N _ X7N+1 Coiler U3N+1 0 * and j Decoiler X7N+8 X7N+8 U3N+4 U3N+4 _ _ _ — —1 (4.26)

be 7N + 8th and 2N + 4th state and control vectors for the N- stand

(26)

x = Ax + Bu + f ( x ) + g ( x , x ( t - T ) , x (t -2 T )) + d

where

A 7N + 8 X 3N + 8 constant matrix

B 7N + 8 X 2N + 4 constant matrix (4.27)

f , g, d, and x are 7N + 8 vector

u is 7N + 4 vector

f and g are nonlinear vector functions.

The above matrices and vectors are defined on the following pages.

(27)

a31 0 a33 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 a44 0 0 0 11 0 0 0 0 a55 0 a 57 i 0 0 0 0 a65 0 0 0 0 0 0 a_ 7 5 0 a77 1 0 a7N-6,7N-12 ° ° l a 7N-6,7N-6 a 7N-6,7N-5 1 0 0 0 ia I /N-7, 7N-6 0 a7N 0 0 0 ; o 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0

J

NO U>

(28)

0 0 0 0 0 0 í-3,7N-3 0 0 a7N-2,7N-2 0 a7N-l,7N-2 0 a7N,7N-2

o

o o o l7N-2,7N O L7N,7N a7N+2,7N+l a7N+2,7N+2 O l7N+4,7N+1 O O O o o o l7N+3, 7N+3 O O o o o 0 0 o 0 0 o 0 0 o 0 0 o 0 0 o 0 a7N+6,7N+5 a7N+6,7N+6 0 0 0 a 0 a 7N+8, 7N+5 0 0 0 o o o o 7N+7, 7N+7 ° 0 0 C o il e r a n d Deco il er S ta n d N .. . S ta

(29)

b31 0 0 0 b42 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 b • • • B= 1I 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 ! b7N-4,3N-2 0 0 ! ° b7N-3,3N-l 0 i ° 0 0 i ° 0 0 1 0 0 b. 7N,3N 0 0 0 0 b7N+2,3N+l 0 0 0 0 b7N+3,3N+2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 b 7N+6 j 3N+3 0 0 0 0 b 0 0 0 0 7N+7, 3N+4 C o il e r a n d Deco il er l S ta n d N r . . . 1 S ta n d 1

(30)

o o o o o o o o I I Q* I " J I O O O O O O I I I CT> I I I CL O O O O O O (-> I l-h —J o 2¡ o a Ln Mi Mi •^J

° ¥

03 o ¡z¡ + -J O a I 0 3 M> II I I Mi O O O 4> O O O I OQ II r O O O O o o o o i OQ ! o o o o o s; OQ a O © • • « 1 » OQ OQ <* O O O O O N3 h- 1 1 1 Ul CT\ 1 » 1

C o i l e r and D e c o i l e r Stand N • • • Stand 1

(31)

has been developed. A generalized state equation of (7N + 8)th order was derived taking into account the dynamics of c o ile r , stands, drive,

screw~down motors and decoiler. The equations turned out to be highly

nonlinear and in general involve time lags due to the transition of strip from one stand to the next.

This model is expected to be a more accurate description of a r o llin g mill than the models proposed thus far since i t uses less approximations such as linearizations of force-torque as well as the

conservation of the strip volume (eq. 2 .8 ). The main reasons for avoid

ing these approximations is that with the existence of d i g i t a l computer and e ffic ie n t numerical methods more r e a l i s t i c models can be handled.

The state equations can be modified for r o llin g mills with different e le c t r ic a l equipment and introduction of new variables cause no d i f f i c u l t y in formulating the new set of equations.

(32)

REFERENCES

1„ P h illip s , R. A ., "Analysis of Tandem Cold Reduction M i ll with

Automatic Gauge Control", AIEE Trans., January, 1957, pp. 355-363.

2. Smith, H. W., "Dynamic Control of a Two-Stand Cold M i l l " ,

Automatica IFAC, Vol. 5, 1969, pp. 183-190.

3. Harvie, R. A . , "E le c tric a l Drive for 56 in Five-Stand Tandem

Cold Reduction M i l l " , ISE Journal, Vol. 27, August, 1950, p. 49.

4. Kokotovic, P. V. and P. Sannuti, "Singular Perturbation Method

for Reducing the Model Order in Optimal Control Design", TEE Trans. AC, Vol. AC-13, No. 4, August, 1968, pp. 377-84.

5. Sannuti, P. and P. V. Kokotovic, "Near-Optimum Design of Linear

Systems by a Singular Perturbation Method", IEEE Trans. AC, Vol. AC-14, No. 1, February, 1969.

6. "Singular Perturbation Method for Near Optimum Design of High-

Order Nonlinear Systems", Proc. IFAC, 4th Congress, 1969.

7. Kokotovic, P. V., W. R. Perkins, J. B. Cruz, J r . , and G. D'Ans,

"e-coupling Method for Near-Optimum Design of Large-Scale Linear Systems", Proc. IEE, Vol. 116, No. 5, May, 1969, pp. 889-92.

8. Jamshidi, M., C. Hadlock, and P. Kokotovic, "Near Optimum Design

of Three Time Scale Systems", to appear.

9. Gabasov, R. and S. V. Churakova, "Necessary Optimality Conditions

in Time-Lag Systems," Automation and Remote Control (Trans. Russian) Consulting Bureau, New York, New York, January, 1968, pp. 37-45.

/

10. Lee, E. B., "Variational Problems for Systems Having Delay in

the Control Action", IEEE Trans. AC, December, 1968, pp, 697-699.

|

11. Chayung, D. H. and E. B. Lee, "Linear Optimal Control Problem with

Delays", J. SIAM on Control, Vol. 4, pp. 548-575, 1966.

12. Ragg, B. C., "Necessary Conditions for the Optimal Control of

a System with Time Varying Transport Lags", IEEE Trans. AC, October, 1966.

13. Orowan, E., "The Calculation of Roll Pressure in Hot and Cold

(33)

14. Finne, R., J. D. Jacob, and J„ Rissanen, "A Mathematical Model of Strip Rolling M i l l s " , IBM Nordiska Laboratorier TP18.0 94,

January, 1963, Nordiska, Sweden.

15. Bland, D. P. and H. Ford, "The Calculation of Roll Force and

Torque in Cold Strip Rolling With Tensions", Proc. Inst. Mech. Engrs. , V o l . 159, pp. 144-63, 1948.

16. Ford, H. "Researches into the Deformation of Metals by Cold Rolling",

Proc. Inst. Mech. Engrs., Vol. 159, p. 115, 1948.

17. Ford, H., F. E l l i s , and D. R. Bland, "Cold Rolling with Strip

Tensions", J. Iron and Steel I n s t r .. Vol. 168, pp. 57-68, London, England.

18. Hessenberg, W. C. F . , and R. B. Sims, "Principles of Continuous

Gauge Control in Sheet and Strip Rol ling", I n s t . Mech. Engrs. J ., Vol. 155, 1952, pp. 75-81, London, England.

19. Ford, H., F. E l l i s , "Comparison of Calculated and Experimental

Results", J„ Iron and Steel I n s t ., Vol. 171, pp. 239-245, 1951.

20. Bland, D. R. and H. Ford, "An Approximate Treatment of the

Elastic Compression of the Strip in Cold Rolling", J. Iron and Steel I n s t . , Vol. 171, October, 1951, pp. 245-249.

21. Jamshidi, M. and P. Kokotovic, "An Approximation of Force-Torque

Equation in Rolling M i l l s " , Coordinated Science Laboratory Report R-452, University of I l l i n o i s , Urbana, I l l i n o i s .

22. Durel li, A. J . , E. A. P h i l l i p s , and C. H, Tsao, Introduction to

the Theoretical, and Experimental Analysis of Stress and Strain, McGraw-Hill Book Co., New York, 1958.

23. Kokotovic, P. and S. Bingulac, "Model Feedback Concept in

Analog Computer Design of Control Systems", Proc. Analog. Comp. Conference, pp. 291-298, Belgrade, Yoguslavia.

24. Moorev, M. V., Multivariable Control Systems, ( tr ansl . Russian),

published for NASA and NSF Israel Program for Scientific Trans­ lation, Jerusalem, 1968.

25. Courcoulas, J. H„ and J. M. Ham, "Incremental Control Equations

(34)

26, Gourishankar, V. , Electromechanical Energy Conversion, Inter­ national Book Co., Scranten, Pennsylvania, 1967.

27, Coughanowr and Koppel, Process Systems Analysis and Control,

McGraw-Hill, New York, 1964.

28, Shinskey, M., Process Control Systems, McGraw-Hill, I960.

29, Perkins, W. R. and J. B. Cruz, J r . , Engineering of Dynamic

Systems, John Wiley and Sons Book Co., New York, 1969.

30, Johnson, F. G., J. H. Stoltz, and R. G. Chapman, J r . , "El ec tri cal

Features of Combinational Temper - Reduction M i l l s " , ISE Journal, October, 1965, pp. 125-134.

(35)

1

31

1

Appendix 1. Notations and Nomenclature

1

Notations :

1

i = "entry" or i nl et plane m o = " e x i t " , or outlet plane

i

n = neutral plane a j = number of stand j = 1 , . . . , N

1

N = maximum number of stands in the mi ll

1

A = F = f - F*F , denotes the operating value

t. . the i nl et tension, t. belonging to

the jth stand.

1

s = screw down motors

|

c = coil er d = decoiler

1

m = motor ( c o i l e r , decoiler)

i

L = load

I

Nomenclature: ef = f i e l d voltage

1

e a = armature voltage

(JO = angular velocity

1

S

oj = screw-down setting of jth stand r o l l s

I

9 = arc of contact ( r o l l s and s tr ip )

m

R = radius of undeformed r o l l

i

R' = radius of deformed r o l l

i

i

(36)

tension per unit area area of the strip

r o l l torque per unit width r o l l force per unit width coefficient of f r i c t i o n strip velocity

modulus of e l a s t i c i t y (Young's modulus) time lag ( s t r i p transit period)

modulus of e l a s t i c i t y (spring constant) of "mill housing" moment of inertia

f r i c ti o n loss gear ratio

coiler or decoiler radius torque constant

magnetic flux armature current armature resistance armature inductance back emf constant f i e l d current back emf constant f i e l d inductance f i e l d resistance

f i e l d winding number of turns coefficients of f i e l d current polynomial

(37)

w = width of the strip K

s = screw-down position gears constant

d = disturbance vector

X = state vector

(38)

Appendix 2.

where

and

Roll Force and Torque Equations [Bland and Ford]

F = F(h.,h , t . , t , r ) = R ' f f n ^ (1 - ^ ) ' i * o i * o 7 L*Jo h v k 7 M<H(h , 0) d0 rei k h n V - H( ho>e0 l

+ Je

Ï T (1 " k 7 ) e

J

n i

(

2

.

1

)

e

T = = RR' J1^ jp- (1 - J2 ) ee»1 + 1ae + O to ^O + 1 0. i,ui kh Jo" if1 C1 “ t t) + t. h . t. - h t lv . i t o o 0 h. H 1 k.i 2R '

(

2

.

2

)

H(h,0) = 2/ f tan" 1 0 h = h (h. ,h , t. ,t t) n n i o i o 1 + \ tan

2

. h. (1 - to/ko) J — In 1 t. 2(1 h (1 - ~ ) J o k. i (2.3)

(39)

In Equation ( 4 . 3) ;

“23 “24

a3j 2k22 ’ “4j 2k22

^25^1

a5j - - 2k22 + 2P.k22 , a l l k' s are for jth stand,

+ 71. (t-T) ” J 12 2k

22

ko , j - l ^ t_T^ ± f ^ ( k2+ki 2ho , + k23X2 , j -+ k24X2,j -+ k25M' j ) “ 1-' " 4ßk22(aj x6j + ^ k ’ qj^ + ß .( q. , K q . ) ) P . J J J

Note that here

qj Cho , j - l ( t _ I ) h0 j (t) X2 , j - 1 X2,j ^

(40)

0 j ( t - T ) ( X22a3j + 'e23a3 j ) x 2 , j - l + ^ 2 2 a4j + X24a4 j ^ X2 , j

+ (X23a4j + ^24a3j + 2'e22a3 j a4j) x 2 , j - l x2j

+ [ ( ^ 23 + 2'e22a3 j) x 2 , j - l + ( ^24 + 2 i 22a4 j ) x 2j + X12ho,

+ (¿2 + 2^22a5j + <e25M' j ^ Tij ( t “T) + ^ 1 2 (a3j X2 , j - l + a4 j X2,j

+ a 5 . ) + ^2^ho , j - l ( t " T^ + ^qj ’- ,qj^ + <e22Tij 2 ( t " 1^ *

Note that L = rL and is as in ( 4 . 2 ) . Equation (4.11);

A ER S2j T h* X. (c - .X . - + c, .X + Y. (t-T) + c,. .+1) _£J__ - L l 3 1 2 , i - l 4i 2i i x 5i V . h*. (a,,.x0 . - + a. .x0 . + Ti. (t-T) + ac .+l) °J °J 3j 2 , j - 1 4j 2j 3 5j h* , ‘n . i + l * 1 . i + l (c3 . 1+1*2.1 + C4 . 1+1*2 ■ 1+1 + vi , j + l hi , j + l <a3 jX2 , j - l ( t * ^ + a4Jx2J(t_l5 + 'i' i + l ( t ' ^ + C5.i+1 + ^ Tlj (t-2T) + a5j + 1)

(41)

Defense Documentation Center Attn: DDC-TCA Cameron Station Alexandria, Virginia 22314 50 Copies ESD (ESTI) L. G. Hanscom Field Bedford, Mass. 01731 2 Copies Director, Electronic Programs Attn: Code 427

Department of the Navy Washington, D. C. 20360 3 Copies Naval Air Systems Command AIR 03

Washington, D.C. 20360 2 Copies Naval Electronic Systems Command ELEX 03, Room 2046 Munitions Building Department of the Navy

Washington, D.C. 20360 2 Copies Director

Naval Research Laboratory Washington, D.C. 20390 Attn: Code 2027 6 Copies Commander

U. S. Naval Ordnance Laboratory Attn: Librarian

White Oak, Md. 21502 2 Copies Commanding General

Attn: STEWS-RE-L, Technical Library White Sands Missile Range New Mexico 88002 2 Copies Commander

Naval Electronics Laboratory Center Attn: Library

San Diego, Calif 92152 2 Copies Raytheon Company Attn: Librarian Bedford, Massachusetts 01730 Dr. L. M. Hollingsworth AFCRL (CRN) L. G. Hanscom Field Bedford, Massachusetts 01731

Division of Engineering & Applied Physics 210 Pierce Hall

Harvard University Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138 Director

Research Laboratory of Electronncs Massachusetts Institute of Technology Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139 Materials Center Reading Room 13-2137 Massachusetts Institute of Technology Cambridge, Mass. 02139

Project MAC Document Room

Massachusetts Institute of Technology 545 Technology Square

Cambridge, Mass. 02139 Raytheon Company Research Division Library 28 Seyon St

Waltham, Massachusetts 02154 Sylvania Electronic Systems Applied Research Laboratory Attn: Documents Librarian 40 Sylvan Road Waltham, Mass. 02154 Commanding Officer

Army Materials & Mechanics Res. Center Attn: Dr. H. Priest

Watertown Arsenal Watertown, Mass. 02172 Lincoln Laboratory

Massachusetts Institute of Technology Lexington, Massachusetts 02173 Commanding Officer

Office of Naval Research Branch Office 495 Summer Street

Boston, Massachusetts 02210 Commanding Officer (Code 2064) Navy Underwater Sound Laboratory Fort Trumbull

New London, Connecticut 06320 Yale University

Engineering Department New Haven, Connecticut 06520 Commanding General

U. S. Army Electronics Command Attn: AMSEL-HL-CT-A Fort Monmouth, New Jersey 07703 Commanding General

U. S. Army Electronics Command Attn: AMSEL-HL-CT-DD Fort Monmouth, New Jersey 07703

Commanding General

U. S. Array Electronics Command Attn: AMSEL-HL-CT-I Fort Monmouth, New Jersey 07703 Commanding General

U. S. Army Electronics Command Attn: AMSEL-HL-CT-L (Dr W. S. McAfee) Fort Monmouth, New Jersey 07703 Commanding General

U. S. Army Electronics Command Attn: AMSEL-HL-CT-0 Fort Monmouth, New Jersey 07703 Commanding General

U. S. Array Electronics Command Attn: AMSEL-HL-CT-R Fort Monmouth, New Jersey 07703 Commanding General

U. S. Army Electronics Command Attn: AMSEL-KL-D

Fort Monmouth, New Jersey 07703 Commanding General

U. S. Army Electronics Command Attn: AMSEL-KL-E

Fort Monmouth, New Jersey 07703 Commanding General

U. S. Array Electronics Command Attn: AMSEL-KL-M (Drs Schie./Hieslmair) Fort Monmouth, New Jersey 07703 Commanding General

U. S. Army Electronics Command Attn: AMSEL-KL-S (Dr. H. Jacobs) Fort Monmouth, New Jersey 07703 Commanding General

U. S. Array Electronics Command Attn: AMSEL-KL-T

Fort Monmouth, New Jersey 07703 Commanding General

U. S. Army Electronics Command Attn: AMSEL-NL-A

Fort Monmouth, New Jersey 07703 Commanding General

U. S. Army Electronics Command Attn: AMSEL-NL-D

Fort Monmouth, New Jersey 07703 Commanding General

U. S. Army Electronics Command Attn: A MSEL-NL-P-2 (Dr. Haratz) Fort Monmouth, New Jersey 07703 Commanding General

U. S. Army Electronics Command Attn: AMSEL- NL-P

Fort Monmouth, New Jersey 07703 Commanding General

U. S. Army Electronics Command Attn: AMSEL-NL-R (Mr. R. Kulnyi) Fort Monmouth, New Jersey 07703 Commanding General

U. S. Army Electronics Command Attn: AMSEL-NL-S

Fort Monouth, New Jersey 07703 Commanding General

U. S. Army Electronics Command Attn: AMSEL-RD-GF

Fort Monmouth, New Jersey 07703 Commanding General

U. S. Army Electronics Command Attn: AMSEL-RD-MT

Fort Monmouth, New Jersey 07703 Commanding General

U. S. Army Electronics Command Attn: A MSEL-SC

Fort Monmouth, New Jersey 07703 Commanding General

U.S. Army Electronics Command Attn: AMSEL-VI-F (R. J. Niemela) Fort Monmouth, New Jersey 07703 Commanding General

U. S. Army Electronics Command Attn: AMSEL-VL-D

Fort Monmouth, New Jersey 07703 Commanding General

U. S. Army Electronics Command Attn: AMSEL-WL-D

Fort Monmouth, New Jersey 07703 Commanding General

U. S. Army Electronics Command Attn: AMSEL-XL-C

Fort Monmouth, New Jersey 07703 Commanding General

U. S. Army Electronics Command Attn: AMSEL-XL-D (Dr. K. Schwidta) Fort Monmouth, New Jersey 07703 Commanding General

U. S. Array Electronics Command Attn: AMSEL-XL-E

Fort Monmouth, New Jersey 07703

Commanding General

U. S. Army Electronics Command Attn: AMSEL-XL-S (Dr. R. Buser) Fort Mouth, New Jersey 07703 Mr. Norman J. Field, AM S E L -RD-S Chief, Office of Science & Technology Research and Development Directorate U. S. Army Electronics Command Fort Monmouth, New Jersey 07703 Mr. Robert 0. Parker, AMSEL-RD-S Executive Secretary, JSTAC U. S. Army Electronics Command Fort Monmouth, New Jersey 07703 Project Manager

Common Positioning & Navigation Systems Attn: Harold H. Bahr (AMCPM-NS-TM),

Bldg.439

U. S. Army Electronics Command Fort Monmouth, New Jersey 07703 U. S. Army Munitions Command Attn: Science & Technology Br. Bldg 59 Picatinny Arsenal, SMUPA-VA6 Dover, New Jersey 07801 N. J. A. Sloane

Bell Telephone Laboratories Mountain Avenue

Murray Hill, New Jersey 07974 European Office of Aerospace Research AP0 New York 09667

New Y ork University College of Engineering New York, N. Y. 10019 Director

Columbia Radiation Laboratory Columbia University 538 West 120th St. New York, N. Y. 10027 Airborne Instruments Laboratory Deer Park, New Y ork 11729

Mr. Jerome Fox, Research Coordinator Polytechnic Institute of Brooklyn 333 Jay St.

Brooklyn, N. Y. 11201 Syracuse University

Dept, of Electrical Engineering Syracuse, N. Y. 13210 Rome Air Development Center Attn: Documents Library (EMTLD) Griffiss Air Force Base, N. Y. 13440 Mr. H. E. Webb (EMMIIS)

Rome Air Development Center Griffiss Air Force Base, N. Y. 13440 Professor James A. Cadzow Department of Electrical Engineering State University of New York at Buffalo Buffalo, N. Y. 14214

Carnegie Institute of Technology Electrical Engineering Department Pittsburgh, Pa. 15213 Hunt Library Carnegie-Mellon University Schenley Park Pittsburgh, Pa. 15213 Lehigh University

Dept of Electrical Engineering Bethelehem, Pennsylvania 18015 Commander (ADL)

Naval Air Development Center Johnsville, Warminster, Pa. 18974 Technical Director (SMUFA-A2000-107-1) Frankford Arsenal

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19137 Philco Ford Corporation Communications & Electronics Div. Union Meeting and Jolly Rods Blue Bell, Pennsylvania 19422 Director

Walter Reed Array Institute of Research Walter Reed Army Medical Center Washington, D.C. 20012

Mr. M. Zane Thornton, Chief, Network Engineering, Communications & Operations Branch, Lister Hill National Center/Biomedical Communications 8600 Rockville Pike

Bethesda, Maryland 20014 Director

Advanced Research Projects Agency Department of Defense

Washington, D.C. 20301 Director for Materials Sciences Advanced Research Projects Agency Department of Defense

(42)

Dr. A. A. Dougal Asst. Director (Research) Ofc. of Defense Res. & Eng. Department of Defense Washington, D.C. 20301 Office of Deputy Director (Research & Information, Rm 3D1037) Department of Defense

The Pentagon Washington, D. C. 20301 Headquarters

Defense Communications Agency (340) Washington, D. C. 20305

Commanding General U. S. Army Material Command Attn: AMCRD-TP

Washington, D.C. 20315 Director, U. S. Army Material Concepts Agency

Washington, D. C. 20315 AFSC (SCTSE)

Andrews Air Force Base, Maryland 20331 Hq USAF (AFRDD) The Pentagon Washington, D. C. 20330 Hq USAF (AFRDDG) The Pentagon Washington, D. C. 20330 Hq USAF (AFRDSD) The Pentagon Washington, D.C. 20330 Dr. I. R. Mirman AFSC (SCT)

Andrews AFB, Maryland 20331 Naval Ship Systems Command Ship 031

Washington, D. C. 20360 Naval Ship System Command Ship 035

Washington, D. C. 20360 Commander

U. S. Naval Security Group Command Attn: G43

3801 Nebraska Avenue Washington, D. C. 20390 Director

Naval Research Laboratory Washington, D. C. 20390

Attn: Dr. A. Brodizinsky, Sup. Elec Div Director

Naval Research Laboratory Washington, D. C. 20390 Attn: Dr. W. C. Hall, Code 7000 Director

Naval Research Laboratory Attn: Library, Code 2029 (0NRL) Washington, D. C. 20390 Dr. G. M. R. Winkler Director, Time Service Division U. S. Naval Observatory Washington, D. C. 20390 U. S. Post Office Department Library - Room 1012 12th & Pennsylvania., N. W. Washington, D. C. 20260 Colonel E. P. Gaines, Jr. ACDA/FO 1901 Pennsylvania Ave. N. W. Washington, D. C. 20451 Commanding Officer Harry Diamond Laboratories Attn: Mr. Berthold Altman (AMXD0-TI) Connecticut Ave. 6c Van Ness St., N.W. Washington, D.C. 20438

Central Intelligence Agency Attn: OCR/DD Publications Washington, D. C. 20505 Dr. H. Harrison, Code RRE Chief, Electrophysics Branch National Aeronautics 6c Space Admin. Washington, D.C. 20546

Federal Aviation Administration Attn: Admin Stds Div (MS-110) 800 Independence Ave. S.W. Washington, D. C. 20590 Director

Nation Security Agency Attn: TDL

Fort George G. Meade, Md. 20755 The John Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory Attn: Document Librarian 8621 Georgia Avenue Silver Springs, Maryland 20910

Commanding Officer

Human Engineering Laboratories Aberdeen Proving Ground Aberdeen, Maryland 21005 Commanding Officer (AMXRD-BAT) U. S. Array Ballistics Research

Laboratory

Aberdeen Proving Ground Aberdeen, Maryland 21005 Electromagnetic Compatibility

Analysis Center (ECAC), Attn: ACLP North Severn

Annapolis, Maryland 21402 Director

U. S. Array Engineer Geodesy Intelligence 6c Mapping Research 6c Development Agency Fort Belvoir, Virginia 22060 Dr. G. M. Janney, AMSEL-HL-NVOR Night Vision Laboratory, USAECOM Fort Belvoir, Virginia 22060 Dr. A, D. Schnitzler, AMSEL-HL-NVII Night Vision Laboratory, USAECOM Fort Belvoir, Virginia 22060 U. S. Army Mobility Equipment Research

and Development Center Attn: Technical Document Center

Bldg. 315

Fort Belvoir, Virginia 22060 Weapons Systems Evaluation Group Attn: Colonel Blaine 0. Vogt 400 Array-Navy Drive Arlington, Virginia 22202 Head, Technical Services Division Naval Investigative Service Headquarters 4420 North Fairfax Drive

Arlington, Virginia 22203

Physical 6c Engineering Sciences Division U. S. Array Research Office

3045 Columbia Pike Arlington, V a . -2204 Lt. Col. H. W. Jackson Chief, Electronics Division Directorate of Engineering Sciences Air Force Office of Scientific Research Arlington, Virginia 22209

Commanding General U. S. Army Security Agency Attn: IARD-T

Arlington Hall Station Arlington, Virginia 22212 VELA Seismological Center 300 North Washington Street Alexandria, Virginia 22314 U. S. Naval Weapons Laboratory Dahlgren, Virginia 22448 Research Laboratories for the Eng.

Sciences, School of Engineering 6c Applied Science

University of Virginia Charlottesville, Va. 22903 Dr. Herman Robl Deputy Chief Scientist

U. S. Army Research Office (Durham) Box CM, Duke Station

Durham, North Carolina 27706 Richard 0. Ulsh (CRDARD-IPO) U. S. Army Research Office (Durham) Box CM, Duke Station

Durham, North Carolina 27706 ADTC (ADBPS-12)

Eglin AFB, Florida 32542 Commanding Officer Naval Training Device Center Orlando, Florida 32813 Technical Library, AFETR

(ETV,MU-135)

Patrick AFB, Florida 32935 Commanding General U. S. Army Missile Command Attn: AMSMI-REX

Redstone Arsenal, Alabama 35809 Redstone Scientific Information Center Attn: Chief, Document Section U. S. Array Missile Command Redstone Arsenal, Alabama 25809 AUL3T-9663

Maxwell AFB, Alabama 36112 Hq AEDC (AETS)

Attn: Library/Documents Arnold AFS, Tennessee 37389 Case Institute of Technology Engineering Division University Circle Cleveland, Ohio 44106

NASA Lewis Research Center Attn: Library

21000 Brookpark Road Clev e l a n d , Ohio 44135 Professor J. J. D'Azzo Dept, of Electrical Engineering Air Force Institute of Technology Wright-Patterson AFB, Ohio 54533 Director

Air Force Avionics Laboratory Wright-Patterson AFB, Ohio 45433 AFAL (AVT) Dr H. V. Noble Electronics Technology Division Air Force Avionics Laboratory Wright-Patterson AFB, 45433 AFAL (AVTA) R. D. Larson Wright-Patterson AFB, Ohio 45433 Dr. Robert E. Fontana

Systems Research Laboratories Inc. 7001 Indian Ripple Road Dayton, Ohio 45440

Dept, of Electrical Engineering College of Engineering 6c Technology Ohio University

Athens, Ohio 45701 Commanding Officer Naval Avionics Facility Indianapolis, Indiana 46241 Dr. John D. Hancock, Head School of Electrical Engineering Purdue University

Lafayette, Ind 47907 Professor Joseph E. Rowe Chairman, Dept of Electrical

Engineering

The University of Michigan Ann Arbor, Michigan 48104 Dr. G. J. Murphy The Technological Institute Northwestern University Evanston, 111. 60201 Commanding Officer

Office of Naval Research Branch Office 219 South Dearborn St.

Chicago, Illinois 60604 Illinois Institute of Technology Dept, of Electrical Engineering Chicago, 111 60616

The University of Arizona Dept, of Electrical Engineering Tucson, Ariz. .85721

Commander Test Command (TCDT-) Defense Atomic Support Agency Sandia Base

Albuquerque, N. M. 87115 Los Alamos Scientific Laboratory Attn: Report Library P. 0. Box 1663 Los Alamos, N. M. 87544 Atmospheric Sciences Office Atmospheric Sciences Laboratory White Sands Missile Range New Mexico 88002 Commanding Officer

U. S. Array Electronics R 6« D Activity White Sands Missile Range

New Mexico 88002 Missile Electronic Warfare Technical Area, AMSEL-WT-MT White Sands Missile Range New M exico 88002 Director

Electronic Sciences Lab. University of Southern California Los Angeles, Calif. 90007 Engineering 6c Mathematical Sciences

Library

University of California at Los Angeles 405 Hilgred Avenue

Los Angeles, Calif. 90024 Aerospace Corporation P.0. Box 95085

Los Angeles, California 90045 Attn: Library Acquisitions Group Det 6, Hq OAR

Air Force Unit Post Office Los Angeles, Calif. 90045 Director, USAF PROJECT RAND Via: Air Force Liaison Office The RAND Corporation Attn: Library D 1700 M ain Street

(43)

Hq SAMSO (SMTTA)Lt Nelson AF Unit Post Office Los Angeles, Calif. 90045 Dr. Sheldon J. Wells

Electronic Properties Information Center Mail Station E-175

Hughes Aircraft Company Culver City, California 90230 Director

Coordinated Science Laboratory University of Illinois Urbana, Illinois 61801 Commandant

U. S. Army Command & General Staff College

Attn: Acquisitions, Library Division Fort Leavenworth, Kansas 66027 Dept of Electrical Engineering Rice University

Houston, Texas 77001 HQ AMD (AMR) Brooks AFB, Texas 78235 USAFSAM (SMKOR) Brooks AFB, Texas 78235 Mr B. R. Locke

Technical Advisor, Requirements USAF Security Service

Kelly Air Force Base, Texas 78241 Director

Electronics Research Center The University of Texas at Austin Austin, Texas 78712

Department of Electrical Engineering Texas Technological College Lubbock, Texas 79409 Commandant

U. S. Army Air Defense School Attn: Missile Sciences D i v . , C&S Dept. P.0. Box 9390

Fort Bliss, Texas 79916 Director

Aerospace Mechanics Division

Frank J. Seiler Research Laboratory (OAR) USAF Academy

Colorado Springs, Colorado 80840 Director of Faculty Research Department of the Air Force U. S. Air Force Academy Colorado Springs, Colorado 80840 Academy Library (DFSLB) U. S. Air Force Academy Colorado Springs, Colorado 80912 Utah State University Dept of Electrical Engineering Logan, Utah 84321

School of Engineering Sciences Arizona State University Tempe, Ariz. 85281 Commanding General

U. S. Array Strategic Communications Command

Attn: SCC-CG-SAE Fort Huachuca, Arizona 85613 Deputy Director and Chief Scientist Office of Naval Research Branch Office 1030 East Green Street

Pasadena, California 91101 Aeronautics Library

Graduate Aeronautical Laboratories California Institute of Technology 1201 E. California Blvd. Pasadena, California 91109 Professor Nicholas George California Inst, of Technology Pasadena, California 91109 Commanding Officer Naval Weapons Center Corona Laboratories Attn: Library Corona, California 91720 Hollander Associates P.0. Box 2276 Fullerton, California 92633 Commander, U.S. Naval Missile Center Point Mugu, California 93041 W. A. Eberspacher, Associate Head Systems Integration Division Code 5340A, Box 15 U. S. Naval Missile Center Point Mugu, California 93041 The Library

Government Publications Section University of California Santa Barbara, California 93106

Commander (Code 753) Naval Weapons Center Attn: Technical Library China Lake, California 93555 Library (Code 2124) Technical Report Section Naval Postgraduate School Monterey, California 93940 Glen A. Myers (Code 52Mv)

Assoc Professor of Elec. Engineering Naval Postgraduate School Monterey, California 93940 Dr. L eo Young

Stanford Research Institute Menlo Park, California 94025 Union Carbide Corporation Electronic Division P.0. Box 1209

Mountain View, California 94041 Lenkurt Electric Co., Inc. 1105 County Road

San Carlos, California 94070 Attn: Mr. E. K. Peterson Director

Microwave Physics Laboratory Stanford University Stanford, California 94305 Director

Stanford Electronics Laboratories Stanford University

Stanford, California 94305 Nuclear Instrumentation Group Bldg 29, Room 101

Lawrence Radiation Laboratory University of California Berkeley, California 94720 Director, Electronics Research

Laboratory

University of California Berkeley, California 94720

(44)

1 Tbvf TTlcTTflr6if ^u<ho,J Coordinated Science Laboratory Urbana, I l l i n o i s 61801

R E P O R T S E C U R I T Y C L A S S I F I C A T I O N

2 b . G R O U P

3 . R E P O R T T I T L E

DYNAMIC MODEL OF A CONTINUOUS COLD ROLLING MILL

4 . D E S C R I P T I V E N O T E S ( T y p e o t r e p o rt a n d i n d u s iv e d a te s ) 5- A U T H O R ( S ) ( F ir s t name, m id d le in it ia l, la s t name)

JAMSHIDI, M. & KOKOTOVIC, P.

6 W m 9D tf f 7 0 7a. T O T A L . N O . O F P A G E S

35

7 b . N O . O F R E F S 33

" d ® s ' w T- e r - v m w i a i so m part afosr 68-1579A» and in part Alcoa Foundation. 9 a . O R I G I N A T O R ' S R E P O R T N U M B E R ( S ) b. P R O J E C T N O . R-459 9b. O T H E R R E P O R T N O ( S ) (A n y o th e r n u m b e rs th a t m a y be a s s i g n e e / th i s re p o rt) UILU-ENG 70-204 1 0 . D I S T R I B U T I O N S T A T E M E N T

This document has been approved for public release and sale; its distribution is unlimited.

1 1 . S U P P L E M E N T A R Y N O T E S D N . S O . R I N G M I L I T A R Y A C T I V I T Y

Joint Services Electronics Program thru U.S. Army Electronics Command Fort Monmouth, New Jersey 07703 1 3 . A B S T R A C T

The dynamic model of a continuous cold reduction mill is developed. The model

makes use of the force-torque equation expansion technique developed in an e a r l i e r report and presents the generalized (7N+8)th order state equation for an N-stand

r o l l i n g mi ll . The equations of interstand tensions are found to be highly nonlinear

with the arguments delayed due to the transition of strip between the stands. The

model developed can used in the design of a controller for the entire r ol l i n g process.

DD ,F,r.,1473

(45)

System Modelling Rolling Mil ls Control Systems State-space Approach ! j * -S e c u r i t y C l a s s i f i c a t i o n

References

Related documents

JMU offers a 4-year program leading to a Bachelor of Nursing degree. During the first 2 years students complete the General Education Program and the Prerequisite Courses. Students

Logical applications in Capsicum UNIX process ambient authority Browser process ambient authority Renderer process capability mode Renderer process capability mode

opportunity to speak English. He shared his experiences at an American university where he met international students from a variety of countries.. If I was speaking with somebody

Next using case studies of Facebook and Google, we demonstrate that infrastructure studies provides a valuable comparative approach to widely accessible services of broad

Scenarios using the data from Oudebosch with different rainfall and groundwater abstraction inputs are simulated to explore individual effects on water levels as well as recharge

The new extended window of Soil Moisture Index (SMI) and its anomaly, described in Section 3 of the 2018’s Annual Progress Report of the European and Global Drought

The design also showed the ability of an underactuated and nearly fully actuated kinematic structure to exist in a single actuation system using remarkably different types of