The DLM Assessment System:
Planning for 2014-15
Implementation
Today’s Topics
1. Overview of the DLM system and year end testing model
2. 2014-2015 from the teacher’s perspective
3. District support for implementation 4. Other topics as requested
OVERVIEW OF ASSESSMENT
SYSTEM
Learning
Map
Claims Conceptual Areas Essential ElementsDLM Essential Elements
• Are the target for the grade level• Reduced depth, breadth, complexity • Provide appropriate level of rigor and
challenge
• Focus on the skills (with multiple means of demonstration)
• Are not functional or pre-K skills or instructional descriptions
Example for English Language Arts
• RL.6.2 Determine a
theme or central idea of a text and how it is
conveyed through particular details;
provide a summary of the text distinct from
personal opinions or judgments.
• EE.RL.6.2 Determine the
theme or central idea of a familiar story and
identify details that relate to it.
Common Core State
Identify two related points the author
makes in an informational text
Testlets in Linkage Levels
Initial Precursor
Target
Successors
Connect the map…
Behavior Testlet IP
…to the items developed.
Distal Precursor Proximal Precursor Behavior Behavior Behavior Behavior Testlet DP Testlet PP Testlet T Testlet S
Fractions
M.EE.3.NF1-3 Differentiate a
fractional part from a whole
Assessment Design
• Testlets– Usually assess 1 EE / linkage level – 3-5 items
– Engagement activity
• ELA: Text or writing task
• Math: Context at beginning, carried
throughout
– Teacher-administered or
• Special user interface designed for DLM
• Customized presentation through
Personal Needs & Preferences (PNP) profile
Sample Testlets
ELA: RI 5.8: Identify the relationship between a specific point and supporting reasons in an
informational text
• Target Level
• Node: Same as EE
Math: 7.NS.2.a: Solve multiplication problems with products to 100
• Initial Precursor Level
• Nodes: Recognize set, recognize
Two Levels of Writing Assessments
• Conventional Writing
– Using orthography to communicate – Selecting topics
– Generating and communicating facts, ideas and
details in writing
• Emergent Writing
– Behaviors that precede conventional writing – Communication about choices and information – Cognitive processes that are precursors to
Example Task/Rating in an Emergent
Writing Testlet – Screen 1
SAY: What do you want to write about?
Choose one.
WAIT AND OBSERVE: Give the student
Example Task/Rating in an Emergent
Writing Testlet – Screen 2
Choose the highest level that describes your observation.
• Makes a choice between objects.
• Attends to objects but does not make a choice. • Seeks objects but does not make a choice.
• Attends to other stimuli. • No response.
Example Task/Rating in an Conventional
Writing Testlet – Screen 1
SAY: What other facts, ideas or details can you write about [topic]?
WAIT: Give the student time if needed to think
about additional facts, details or other information about the topic.
SAY: Write about them.
WAIT AND OBSERVE: Give the student time to
Example Task/Rating in an Conventional
Writing Testlet – Screen 2
Choose the highest level that describes your observation.
• Independently wrote 3 or more facts, ideas or
details related to the topic
• Independently wrote at least 2 facts, ideas or
details related to the topic
• Wrote one fact related to the topic
• Wrote multiple facts, ideas or details unrelated to
the topic.
• Wrote a single fact, idea or detail unrelated to the
Accessibility
Accessible Content Technology Personal Learning ProfileAccessible Content
• Testlet levels• Vocabulary
• Multiple and alternate pathways • Special item writing guidelines
– Careful attention to unnecessary
Personal Learning Profile
Personal Needs and Preferences (PNP)
• Display
• Language & Braille • Audio & Environment
First Contact • Communication • Academics • Sensory characteristics • Motor characteristics • Computer access
• Special user interface designed for DLM
• Dynamic routing
Accessibility Manual
1. Include Eligible Students in the DLM Assessment
2. Learn About the DLM Accessibility Features: What Does DLM Provide?
3. Discuss and Select Appropriate Supports and Tools: Considerations for IEP Teams
4. Enter Appropriate Supports into the DLM System
5. Prepare for the Assessment: Using the Chosen Accessibility Features
6. Evaluate the Accessibility Features Used After the Assessment
1. Supports activated by PNP
A. Magnification
B. Invert Color Choice C. Color Contrast
D. Color Overlay
E. Read Aloud with highlighting – Text to Speech text only
text & graphics graphics only nonvisual
2. Supports Requiring Additional
Materials/Tools
F. Uncontracted Braille
G. Single-switch system/PNP enabled H. Two switch system
I. Administration via iPad
J. Adaptive equipment used by student K. Individualized Manipulatives
3. Supports Provided
Outside the System
L. Human Read Aloud
M. Sign interpretation of text N. Language translation of text
O. Test administrator enter responses for student P. Partner Assisted Scanning
Personal Needs & Preferences
(PNP) Profile
• Display Enhancements • Language & Braille
• Audio & Environment • Other Supports
Students with Blindness/Visual
Impairments
• Alternate forms
– Content would normally be represented
on computer but translated into teacher-administered testlet
• Braille
Braille
• Very small number of DLM students use Braille
• Forms will be available:
– Beginning spring 2015 operational
window
– Only in upper linkage levels
• Delivery method still under evaluation by state partners
Hardware/Software
• No software costs (KITE is free)– PNP features built in
• Use devices already available
(interactive whiteboard, 1-switch or 2-switch systems, headphones, etc.) • Option for test administrator to enter
Year End Assessment Model
Optional
Instructionally-Embedded Spring Testing Required
Optional Instructionally Embedded Testlets can be delivered for select Essential Elements
System recommends linkage level; teacher can accept or override
Student performance does not contribute for summative
purposes
Testlets cover the whole blueprint
Dynamic routing supports adaptivity between testlets (system determines linkage levels)
Scores are used for summative purposes
Content of the Assessment
• Grades 3-8 and high school– English Language Arts (ELA) – Mathematics
• Blueprints:
– Consortium approved a subset of
Essential Elements
– Consortium set minimum requirements
Test Delivery
Optional Instructionally Embedded
• One testlet per EE
chosen in ITI
– Teacher chooses linkage
level
• Each testlet assigned
separately
• Test administrator
schedules sessions within testing windows
Spring (End of Year)
• 4-7 testlets per subject
depending on grade
– Entire blueprint covered – System chooses linkage
levels
• Each testlet assigned
separately
• Test administrator
schedules sessions within window
Testlet Delivery
Part
1
IP
DP
PP
T
S
Part
2
IP
DP
PP
T
S
Part
3
IP
DP
PP
T
S
Part
4
IP
DP
PP
T
S
System has testlets available at all 5 linkage levels for
every part of the test Students take one
testlet from one level for each group
System determines which level to deliver to the student
Testlet Delivery
Part 1
IP DP PP T SPart 2
IP DP PP T SPart 3
IP DP PP T SPart 4
IP DP PP T STestlet Delivery
Part 1
IP DP PP T SPart 2
IP DP PP T SPart 3
IP DP PP T SPart 4
IP DP PP T STestlet Recommendations &
Assignments
Performance Profile
Part 1: Overall Results
Performance Profile
Performance Profile
Part 3: Narrative
• Installed on testing devices • Student login credentials
• Website access (use Firefox) • Staff login credentials
2014-15 FROM THE TEACHER’S
PERSPECTIVE
Key Steps
1. Training & PD2. Eligibility and accessibility decisions
3. Manage student data in Educator Portal 4. Select content; provide instruction
5. Optional: prepare for & deliver
instructionally embedded assessments 6. Prepare for & deliver testlets during
spring window
Required Training vs.
Professional Development
Training
• Multiple modules
• Available in self-directed
and facilitated formats (states/districts decide which to use)
• Covers critical content for
managing and delivering the assessment
• Required for all test
administrators
– No access to student logins without it
PD
• Multiple modules
• Available in self-directed
and facilitated formats (states/districts decide which to use)
• Covers a variety of topics
to support instruction in academics
• States determine what is
Other Resources for
Test Administrators
• Test Administration Manual
– With checklist
• Accessibility Manual
• Information about EEs and levels • Access to released testlets and
practice activities
• Educator resource page with supplemental info & videos
Management of Student Records
• Accuracy of roster
– Correct students, correct information
• First Contact
• PNP: Accessibility features discussed with IEP teams
– Documented in IEP
DISTRICT SUPPORT FOR
IMPLEMENTATION
DLM-Defined Roles
• Data Steward• Technical Liaison
• Assessment Coordinator
• Test Administrator (teacher, educator) • Individuals may fill more than one
Some States Have Other Roles
• Regional technical assistance provider • Mentor/facilitator• Vendor (other support services) • Others?
Data Steward Responsibilities
• Gather, validate, and upload teacher,student, and roster data into Educator Portal
Technical Liaison Responsibilities
• KITE™ Client
• Troubleshooting Educator Portal • Troubleshooting CSV files
• Whitelisting
– *.cete.us
Assessment Coordinator
Responsibilities
• Manage district/school staff roles
• Develop and implement training plan • Develop and implement
communication plan
• Monitor / support test preparations and administration
Checklist
• Categories:– Before beginning assessment
• Information/resources • Steps to take
– During (Optional) instructionally
embedded assessment
– Spring assessment
Before Assessment
Manage district/school staff roles
and responsibilities.
• Identify test administrators/examiners • Identify a Technical Liaison
• Share roles/responsibilities and timelines with staff
Before Assessment
Prepare for assessment implementation
• Disseminate Technical Liaison contact information • Encourage sign up for test notifications
• Establish communications between Data Steward,
Technical Liaisons, and DLM.
• Develop communication channels with district
personnel (updates, etc.)
• Monitor creation of Educator Portal user accounts
• Follow up with test administrators • Establish a test security plan
User Account Creation
Common Roles in Educator Portal
• District Test Coordinator • Teacher
• Building Test Coordinator • Building & District Users
Assigning Permissions in EP
State
District
Building
Unusual Cases
• Contract teachers• Out of district students • Charter schools
Before Assessment
Develop and implement a comprehensive training plan OR implement your state’s training plan for district staff and test administrators.
• Review the checklists (TL & TA)
• Encourage Technical Liaisons to complete training • Deliver required test administration training
• Monitor educator completion of required training • Identify additional training needs
Monitoring Completion of RT
Now
• Participant can take screen shot of
transcripts area
• State PD administrator can look up
individuals
• State PD administrator can run PD
completion report, share with districts Starting in January
• New District PD administrator role – look up
Before Assessment
Monitor and support test preparations.
• Remind Technical Liaisons and Test Administrators
about important deadlines.
• Monitor identification of students for DLM
• Ensure every student in the system is assigned to a teacher
• Monitor completion of Access (PNP) Profile and First Contact
• Assist test administrators with technology
preparations
• Support test environment preparation
Before Assessment
Develop a plan to facilitate communications with parents and district staff.
• Consider what parents and district staff will
need and want to know about DLM assessments in 2014-15.
• Determine the frequency of communications
to various audiences.
• Deliver communication to various audiences
on the timeline in your communication plan.
• Relay new information from DLM and your
state and district to appropriate audiences as needed.
Before the Spring Window
• Support Test Administrators inrechecking student enrollment, demographic information, PNP
Checklist
• Categories:– Before beginning assessment
• Information/resources • Steps to take
– During instructionally embedded
assessment
– Spring assessment
Spring Window
• Monitor and support test administration.
• Facilitate communications between DLM staff
and district staff during testing window(s).
• Obtain and deliver Braille forms as needed.
• Monitor test activity, including test completion
prior to end of testing window.
• Serve as the first point-of-contact for teachers,
answering questions about the assessment. Troubleshoot issues as they arise.
• Serve as the point-of-contact to the DLM help
Monitoring
Available in January:• Report showing number of testlets
completed and in progress vs. what is intended
Checklist
• Categories:– Before beginning assessment
• Information/resources • Steps to take
– During instructionally embedded
assessment
– Spring assessment
Resources & Next Steps
• Bookmark your state’s page on the DLM
website. Use the resources on your state’s page.
• Activate your Educator Portal account by
following the instructions in the KITE activation email.*
• Complete the Security Agreement in Educator
Portal profile.*
• Sign up for DLM test notifications during the
Help Desk Support
• Three tiers of support for local users • Information published in the front of
all manuals
• Toll-free phone number
– Extended hours during testing windows
• Email with ticketing system
• Answers customized per testing model & for unique state policies
Communication
KITE system • Status on website • Testing updates subscription • Special email to states Other issues • Special email to states • Additional postings, announcements as warrantedTHANK YOU!
For more information, please contact:
Go to: www.dynamiclearningmaps.org
For Professional Development, contact:
The present publication was developed under grant 84.373X100001 from the U.S. Department of Education, Office of Special Education Programs. The views expressed herein are solely those of the author(s), and no official endorsement by the U.S. Department should be inferred.