• No results found

Governance Model: Issue Escalation and Resolution Framework

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Governance Model: Issue Escalation and Resolution Framework"

Copied!
6
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

Governance Model:

I

E

l ti

d R

l ti

Issue Escalation and Resolution

Framework

SMARTcomputing Project Team

SMARTcomputing

(2)

SMARTcomputing

Issue Escalation and Resolution

Framework Q & A

What is an Issue?

z

An issue is a point of system function, feature, design or process that the Technical Steering Committee has not

resolved or that is determined to be out of jurisdiction for the Technical Steering Committee

z

An issue can also be a ‘requirement’ or “request” that breaks something within the existing SMARTcomputing

Program

z Issue tracking and follow-up will be the responsibility of the Program Manager

Who can ‘log’ an Issue?

g

z

Anyone participating in the SMARTcomputing Program, Technical Steering Committee or Exec. Oversight

Committee

When are issues escalated?

z

Technical Steering Committee to review all unresolved issues and escalate appropriately at regular meeting

z

Technical Steering Committee to review all unresolved issues and escalate appropriately at regular meeting

z

Timeliness / Decision may drive escalation outside of scheduled meetings – “Rapid Escalation Process”

Who can view the Issues Log?

z

Issues log can be reviewed by any SMARTcomputing participant, Technical Steering Committee or Exec.

g

y

y

p

g p

p

,

g

Oversight Committee on Secured Section of SMARTcomputing website.

z

Open Issue log will be distributed to all appropriate parties prior to all scheduled meetings

z

Issues using the Rapid Escalation Process will be distributed on an as needed basis

(3)

SMARTcomputing

Jurisdiction: Empowerment of Teams

Jurisdiction

Escalation Rules

h

t The Executive Oversight Committee:

cutive Oversig

h

• Membership made up of all IT Directors participating or otherwise interested in the SMARTcomputing program.

• Resolves issues escalated from the Technical Steering Committee

• Makes decisions on changes to scope timeline

The Technical Steering Committee: The Technical Steering Committee is to Escalate Issues When…

Exe

Makes decisions on changes to scope, timeline, budget & policies (e.g. participation criteria, cost model)

• Recommend 2/3 majority vote to pass resolution

• Membership made up of rep from each participating unit (voluntary)

• Escalates policy issues to Executive Oversight Committee

• Makes recommendations on issues regarding policy

• Issues pertain to policy, scope and/or budget

• Issue cannot be resolved within the scope of the Technical Steering Committee’s jurisdiction

• Efforts to resolve the issue are unsuccessful or require Executive Oversight Committee support

• Project Teams can use the Decision Escalation Criteria and

Steering mittee policy

• Makes decisions on issues regarding technical process designs & procedures (e.g. HW/SW config, baseline image, mgmt tool selection & configuration)

• Recommend 2/3 majority vote to pass resolution

• Project Teams can use the Decision Escalation Criteria and Checklist to assess whether the issue has significant impact • The Issue Escalation Template must be completed to all issues

escalated to the Program Manager

• Note: For Critical issues, when a decision needed in less than 3 days, the Steering Committee Chair will delegate decision making authority to the ‘Program Manager’ to quickly resolve

Technical

Com

m

(4)

SMARTcomputing

Jurisdiction: Empowerment of Teams

Jurisdiction

Escalation Rules

The SMARTcomputing Program Office: The SMARTcomputing Program Manager is to Escalate Issues When…

• Coordinates requests for governance consideration • Facilitates Executive Oversight Committee (ECO)

& Technical Steering Committee (TSO) meetings • Coordinates change control process for image

content & configuration

• Coordinates contracts & licensing administration

• Issues pertain to policy, scope and/or budget

• Issue cannot be resolved within the scope of the Technical Steering Committee’s jurisdiction

• Efforts to resolve the issue are unsuccessful or require Executive Oversight Committee support

O

ffice Coordinates contracts & licensing administration

for Tier 1 products

• Interfaces with vendor (for HW / SW & mgmt tool) • Administrate program (recordkeeping, budget

coordination, etc)

• Coordinates infrastructure capacity with sponsoring unit

Executive Oversight Committee support

• Project Teams can use the Decision Escalation Criteria and Checklist to assess whether the issue has significant impact • The Issue Escalation Template must be completed to all issues

escalated to the Program Manager

• Note: For Critical issues, when a decision needed in less than 3 days the Steering Committee Chair will delegate decision

ting

Program

O

unit

• Initiates & coordinates incremental HW / SW refresh reviews

• Coordinates annual approval of Chargeback Prices • Maintains program’s web site

• Coordinates OLA: Operations Level Agreement Coordination

3 days, the Steering Committee Chair will delegate decision making authority to the ‘Program Manager’ to quickly resolve.

SMARTcompu

Coordination

• Makes recommendations to develop and evolve the Program

• Advocates Program

• Facilitates Program communications

• Supervisory of SMS System Administrator Position

The IT Executive Steering Committee (ITESC):

• Strategic guidance from existing ITESC

The IT Executive Steering Committee (ITESC) is to Escalate Issues When…

(5)

SMARTcomputing

Issue Escalation and Resolution

Governance

IT Executive

SMARTcomputing Governance Structure

IT Executive

Steering

Committee

Strategic guidance from existing IT Executive Steering

Program

Manager

IT Executive Steering Committee

Level 2

Executive Oversight

Committee

Goal: = 20% of decisions

• Make final decisions on behalf of

SMARTcomputing Program

• Authorizes changes to scope,

and/or budget as necessary

Makes day-to-day

decisions (

manages processes / procedures, when to escalate vs. no impact, participation eligibility etc)

• Make decisions based on

Jurisdiction or refer back to

sub-committees for more analysis

• Utilize

‘Rapid Escalation

Process’

E

l t t E

ti

O

i ht

Level 1

eligibility, etc)

•Manages requests

for EOC

consideration

•Accountable to

EOC

• Escalate to Executive Oversight

Committee as necessary

• Solicit recommendations to

Executive Oversight Committee

• Maintain responsibility for issue

management

Steering Committee

Goal: = 80% of decisions

•Facilitates EOC &

TSC meetings

•Program

Communications

Facilitator

management

(6)

SMARTcomputing

Next Steps

„

Review, discuss & approve

„

Further develop Issue Escalation and Resolution Framework

z

Issues Q&A

z

Decision Escalation Criteria & Checklist

z

Issue Escalation Template

References

Related documents

EDU 664 Organizational Decision-Making (3) EDU 654 Legal Issues in School Governance (3) EDU 624 Curriculum and School Improvement (3) EDU 653 Leadership Issue I – Theories

The area of tissue that joins the epidermal and dermal layers of the skin is called the dermo-epidermal junction. This porous basement membrane zone allows the exchange of cells

Apply the framework for professional decision making and ethical decision making to issues involving the audit of revenue cycle accounts, disclosures, and assertions.. Auditing

1 from 14 pièces pour flûte et piano Selected Flute Exam Pieces 2008–13, 2 Pam Wedgwood Hot Chilli: from Really Easy Jazzin’ About for Flute Grade 1 (ABRSM).. 3 John Widger Fun

OPEN: This module is available starting the first day of class. This module will provide you with the syllabus, an introductory lecture by the professor, and provide you with

Every sense experience, at its source, is a union of subject and object, of the sense organs, their objects and the mind that senses.. Everything that is experienced as

In the present project, Modified National Wetland Classification system is used for wetland delineation and mapping comprising 19 wetland classes which are organized under a Level

• Priority access to Airbus DS exchange pool to minimise any potential materials shortage (AOG services) MATERIAL MAnAgEMEnT InITIAL SpARES pRovISIonIng/ SpARES