• No results found

The Prequalification Process for Telecommunication Contractors. By Rob Friend, RCDD, RTPM(i) & Cindy Towles, LEED AP

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "The Prequalification Process for Telecommunication Contractors. By Rob Friend, RCDD, RTPM(i) & Cindy Towles, LEED AP"

Copied!
28
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

The Prequalification Process for

q

Telecommunication Contractors

By Rob Friend, RCDD, RTPM(i)

& Cindy Towles, LEED AP

of

(2)

Introduction

Introduction

Rob Friend RCDD RTPM(i)

Rob Friend, RCDD, RTPM(i)

Cindy Towles, LEED AP

h d

lifi

i

?

Why do a Prequalification Process?

Better pool of Bidders

More competitive

More highly qualified

(3)

Pros of Prequalification

Pros of Prequalification

Better bidding pool

Better bidding pool

More opportunity for the Consultant to understand the jobj

Better relationship with/between the Owner, Consultant and the prequalified Contractorp q

(4)

Cons of Prequalification

Cons of Prequalification

Adds time and cost to the overall project

Adds time and cost to the overall project

(5)

Why provide this presentation?

Why provide this presentation?

Explain the process of Prequalification

Explain the process of Prequalification

Educate Owners

Educate Consultants

Educate Consultants

(6)

Three Relevant Aspects

Three Relevant Aspects

Technical component

Administrative involvement Owner’s input

(7)

Steps in a Prequalification Process

Steps in a Prequalification Process

List of Contractors

List of Contractors

Advertisement for Prequalification

Prequalification Document

Prequalification Document

Checklist

Project & Overall Score Sheet

Project & Overall Score Sheet

Summary

Letters to Contractors and the Owner

Letters to Contractors and the Owner

(8)

List of Contractors

List of Contractors

 Recommendations from the Owner

 Recommendations from the Owner

 Consultant’s experience of capable Contractors

 Previously known relatively qualified Contractors

 Previously known relatively qualified Contractors from other reliable sources

 Create a spreadsheet: Name/Address/Contact

 Create a spreadsheet: Name/Address/Contact Person/Phone/Fax/Email/Notified/Picked up or sent package checkbox

(9)

Advertisement for Prequalification

Handled by Owners

Handled by Owners

Name of Work/Project Number

Estimated Construction Cost

Estimated Construction Cost

Required Licenses

Description of Work

Description of Work

Conference: Mandatory

Availability & Due Date

Availability & Due Date

(10)

Mandatory Prequalification

C

f

Conference

Sign In

Hand Out Prequalification Packet

Review Requirements

Review Submittal Dates

Questions

(11)

Prequalification Questionnaire

Prequalification Questionnaire

Basic Contractor Questions

Basic Contractor Questions

General Description of Work

Instructions on how to reply

(12)

Prequalification Questionnaire,

’d

cont’d

Evaluation Criteria

Evaluation Criteria

Licensing

Bonding

Financial Ability

Insurance Capacity

Relevant Experience

History & Organization

P j t f Si il Si S d C l it

Projects of Similar Size, Scope and Complexity

(13)

Questionnaire Attachments

Questionnaire Attachments

Complete Contractor Information Questions

Confirm License Requirements and General History Complete Project Experience Data Sheets

C l t St ff Q ti

(14)

Attachments, cont’d

Attachments, cont d

Demonstrate Safety Record Confirm Bonding Capacity

Meet Insurance Requirements M t S b itt l R i t Meet Submittal Requirements

(15)

Questionnaire Details

Questionnaire Details

Contractor Information Questions

Contractor Information Questions

Name & Vital Statistics

Declaration

License Requirements and General History

License Info

# Years in Business

Type of Ownership

(16)

Questionnaire Details: Project Experience Data

Sh

(3 P j

Mi i

)

’d

Sheets (3 Project Minimum), cont’d

Typical Questions, cont’d

Typical Questions, cont d

Project Information

Value

Matching Scope:

Cable Sheath in Feet

Number of Strands

Splices

Closures

Etc

(17)

Questionnaire Details: Project Experience Data

Sh

(3 P j

Mi i

)

’d

Sheets (3 Project Minimum), cont’d

Typical Questions, cont’dyp Q ,

Other Project Information

 Work Hours  Active Strands

Wireless

Confined Space  Active Strands

 Innerduct  Riser Fiber  Furniture

Confined Space As-Builts

CAD Backgrounds Testing & Certification  Furniture Testing & Certification

(18)

Questionnaire Details:

S ff P f

i

l C

bili i

Staff Professional Capabilities

Description of Sizep Specific Crews

CAD Capabilities

Proposed Staff

p

Splicing

Terminating

Pulling

PM

Supervisor

Pulling

(19)

Questionnaire Details: Safety Record

Questionnaire Details: Safety Record

Safety Programy g Safe to Work Program

Illness & Injury

Prevention Program (IIPP) id

g

OSHA 200 Log

Incident Rate (IIPP) provide copy

Current MOD Rate (EMR)

Lost Day Rate ( )

1.0 or less is good

Compare a company’s annual losses in insurance claims against its policy premium over a 3 year period

(20)

Questionnaire Details: Declarations – to match

O

’ R

i

Owner’s Requirements

Certifications of:

Certifications of:

No violations of Part 1 of Div 5 of the California Labor Code

EMF below 1.00

IIPP pursuant to Section 3201.5 or 6401.7 of the Labor Code

(21)

Questionnaire Details: Declarations – to match

O

’ R

i

’d

Owner’s Requirements, cont’d

Surety Questions

Surety Questions

Bonding

Surety Info

Provide Surety Declaration

Include Power of Attorney and Sign Notarization

(22)

Questionnaire Details: Declarations – to match

O

’ R

i

’d

Owner’s Requirements, cont’d

Insurance Questions

Insurance Questions

General Liability Limits – $5M/10M

Certificate of Liability – $5M

(23)

Questionnaire Details, cont’d

Questionnaire Details, cont d

Check List

Check List

Basic Items – Yes/No

Fail/Pass

Scoresheet – Per Project

Align with the questionnaire

Assign points for meeting requirements listed on the scoresheet

scoresheet

(24)

Summary Spreadsheet

Summary Spreadsheet

Contractor

Contractor

Overall Result

Overall Scoresheet Evaluation

Overall Scoresheet Evaluation

Number of Passing Prequalifying Projects

List Projects and Reason for Failure

List Projects and Reason for Failure

(25)

Remedy Period

Remedy Period

Contact contractors with hope of remedy

Contact contractors with hope of remedy

Determine who simply cannot qualify

Limit remedy period

Limit remedy period

Review submittals

Summarize results

(26)

Summary of Results

Summary of Results

Summary Letter To Owner

Summary Letter To Owner

Backup Provided

List of Qualified Contractors

List of Qualified Contractors

Publish the List

Letters to the Successful

Letters to the Successful

(27)

Who Stands to Benefit from Prequalifications?

Who Stands to Benefit from Prequalifications?

Owners

Owners

Contractors

C

l

Consultants

Administrative Side

Significant Throughout

Need to track dates and submittals

Need to create forms

(28)

The End

The End

h

k

References

Related documents

• Appendix A : Checklist Form • Appendix B : Application Form • Appendix 1 : Experience and Resources Verification Letter (Template) • Appendix 2 : Traffic

If the application is approved, a Prequalification Certificate is issued to the prime contractor, allowing it to apply for bidding credentials and ultimately to

Flow my beers: lute music in London pubs, 3rd August and 28th September Enterprising as ever, Lady Lovelylute, alias Stephanie Feeney, DJ of the early music and erudite chat

In-depth knowledge of the LEED process allows the suppliers to bet- ter support the general contractors and design community and help ensure that the elevators and escalators used

Intent: Verify that the building’s energy related systems are installed, callibrated and perform according to the owner’s project requirements, basis of design and

Middle East Call Centre Awards 2016... • Awarded to call centres

In this section we show that the stochastic cycle model can to some extent be tested and that the length of the critical cycle in the TC filter can be endogenised and adjusted to

In the preceding sections we have described how this is accomplished by modeling the domain of sensors and sensor observations in a suite of ontologies, adding semantic