• No results found

Income Tax Aspects of Partnership Operation

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2020

Share "Income Tax Aspects of Partnership Operation"

Copied!
9
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

Montana Law Review

Volume 18

Issue 2

Spring 1957

Article 4

January 1957

Income Tax Aspects of Partnership Operation

John S. Crawford

Guest Speaker at the Fourth Annual Tax School

Follow this and additional works at:

https://scholarship.law.umt.edu/mlr

Part of the

Law Commons

This Article is brought to you for free and open access by The Scholarly Forum @ Montana Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in Montana Law Review by an authorized editor of The Scholarly Forum @ Montana Law.

Recommended Citation

(2)

Income Tax Aspects of Partnership Operationt

By JOHN S. CRAWFORD*

As partnership affairs are conducted from day to day, the individual partners have transactions with the partnership and with each other. It is the income tax consequences of such transactions that are discussed here.

For purposes of illustration let us take a law partnership on the cash basis, reporting its income only as it is collected and claiming deductions when they are paid rather than when they are incurred. Its assets and

lia-bilities are selected to demonstrate the different income tax consequences which may result from transactions involving various items.

These assets and liabilities are:

Book Present

ASSETS: Basis Value

Cash ... $ 4,000 $ 4,000

Accounts receivable and work in process ... ... 20,000 Buildings-net of depreciation reserve ... 50,000 60,000

Library and office equipment ... 1,000 5,000

Investments- stocks ... 5,000 15,000

$60,000 $104,000

LIABILITIES AND CAPITAL:

A ccounts payable ... $ 4,000

M ortgage on building ... $30,000 30,000

Total liabilities ... $30,000 $34,000

Partners' Capital'

A -50. ... 15,000 35,000

B - 30% ... 9,000 21,000

C- 20% ... 6,000 14,000 Total capital ... $30,000 $70,000

$60,000 $104,000

DISTRIBUTION OF PROPERTY TO A PARTNER

First, we shall examine the problems involved in the distribution of property by a partnership to a partner. Section 731' sets forth the general rules with respect to the extent of recognition of gain or loss on distribu-tions.

tThis article was originally delivered orally at the Fourth Annual Tax School pre-sented by the School of Law at Montana State University in December, 1956, and is reprinted from ESTATE PLANNING AND INcOME TAXATION, the report of the proceed-ings of the school.

*Partner, accounting firm of Touche, Niven, Bailey & Smart, Portland, Oregon. Certified Public Accountant; member of the Oregon Bar. B.S., University of Ore-gon; LL.B., Northwestern College of Law.

'It is assumed that the individual partner's basis of his partnership interest is the same as the amount of his capital account on the partnership records.

(3)

160 MONTANA LAW REVIEW [Vol. 18, Does the partnership realize a gain or loss upon the distribution of property to a partner? Section 731(b) provides: "No gain or loss shall be recognized to a partnership on a distribution to a partner of property, including money."

Does the partner realize a gain or loss upon the receipt of a distribution of property? The answer is sometimes "yes," sometimes no."

Gain is not recognized except to the extent that any money distributed

exceeds the adjusted basis of the partner's interest in the partnership im-mediately before the distribution. For example: If a partner with a basis of $10,000 receives a distribution of $8,000 in cash and property with a fair market value of $3,000, no gain is recognized to him. If $11,000 cash were distributed, gain would be recognized to the extent of $1,000.8

Loss is not recognized upon a distribution except where the distribution

is in liquidation of a partner's entire interest and where only money, un-realized receivables or appreciated inventory is distributed. If only these classes of assets are distributed, then the loss recognized is computed in the following manner: From the partner's basis in his partnership interest subtract (1) any money distributed to him, and (2) the basis to the dis-tributee of any unrealized receivables and appreciated inventory. (This basis is usually the partnership's basis.)

For example: Partner A has a partnership interest in Partnership ABC with an adjusted basis to him of $10,000. He retires from the partnership and receives, as a distribution in liquidation of his entire interest, his share of partnership property. This share is $5,000 cash and inventory with a basis to him (under section 732) of $3,000. Partner A realizes a capital loss of $2,000, which is recognized under section 731 (a) (2).'

If, in the former example, A had received real property with an ad-justed basis to the partnership of $1,000, in addition to the other assets, no loss would have been recognized and the real property would have a basis to him of $2,000.'

These then are the general rules: There is no gain or loss to the part-nership on distribution. Gain to a partner is possible when cash is received. Loss to a partner is possible when amounts received in liquidation consist only of cash, unrealized receivables and appreciated inventory.

Section 731, however, provides for certain exceptions: "This sec-tion shall not apply to the extent otherwise provided by secsec-tion 736 (relating to payments to a retiring partner or a deceased partner's successor in interest) and section 751 (relating to unrealized receivables and inventory items)."' Payments to a retiring or deceased partner are subject to special rules which are covered by Mr. Kinsey's article.'

To understand section 751 you must understand the objective which Congress was endeavoring to accompish. Under the prior law some tax-payers were reducing their income taxes by some rather devious, but legal, devices.

8U.S. Treas. Reg. § 1.731-1(a) (1) (i) (1956).

'See also: U.S. Treas. Reg. § 1.731-1(a) (2) (ii) Example (1) (1956).

"Id. Example (2).

'I NT. REv. CoDE OF 1954, § 731(c).

7Kinsey, Income Tax Aspects of Partnership Dissolution, 18 MONTANA L. REv. 167 (1957).

2

Montana Law Review, Vol. 18 [1956], Iss. 2, Art. 4

(4)

You are familiar with the use of the collapsible corporation by mem-bers of the motion picture industry to convert ordinary income into capital gains. In 1950 this use of a corporation was at least partially blocked. How-ever, this result was still possible to a limited extent with partnerships. Un-realized increases in value could be created in the partnership; then the partnership interest, a capital asset, would be sold at a gain and reported as a long-term capital gain. The purchaser would dissolve the partnership and allocate the purchase price to the assets received on the dissolution.

In our example, A has a basis of $15,000 in a partnership interest worth $35,000. Under prior lai it was possible that if he sold his partnership in-terest or withdrew assets other than accounts receivable, he could realize an ultimate capital gain of $20,000 and realize no ordinary income. He would in effect convert his one-half of the $20,000 fee income represented by ac-counts receivable to capital gain.

To avoid the above result, an exception to the general rule was, pro-vided where (1) the distribution was either of unrealized accounts receivable or appreciated inventory, or (2) where the partner received other assets in lieu of his interest in the unrealized receivables or appreciated inventory.

Unrealized receivables are defined as including, to the extent not pre-viously included in income under the method of accounting used by the part-nership, any rights (contractual or otherwise) to payment

for-(1) goods delivered, or to be delivered, to the extent the proceeds therefrom would be treated as received from the sale or exchange of property other than a capital asset, or

(2) services rendered or to be rendered!

Inventory items which have appreciated substantially in value are de-fined in the Code:

(1) They must have a fair market value of 120 per cent or more of the adjusted basis to the partnership of such property, and (2) they must represent ten per cent or more of the fair market value

of all partnership property other than money.

Inventory items include what is normally considered as being inven-tory. Also included is any other property of the partnership which would not be considered a capital asset or property used in a trade or business held for over six months. These latter exceptions may be inventory items if they would have an inventory status in the hands of the selling or distributee

partner.

Section 751(b) of the 1954 Code provides that certain distributions will be treated as sales or exchanges. To the extent that a partner receives, in a distribution, unrealized receivables or appreciated inventory in ex-change for all or part of his interest in other partnership property, the transaction shall be considered as a sale or exchange. To the extent that a partner receives any distributed property (including money) other than unrealized receivables and appreciated inventory in exchange for all or a part of his interest in those items, such transaction shall be considered as a

'INT. REV. CODE OF 1954, § 751(c).

(5)

MONTANA LAW REVIEW

sale or exchange of such property." These two provisions do not pertain to a distribution of property which the distributee contributed to the partner-ship or payments, described in section 736(a), to a retiring partner or suc-cessor in interest to a deceased partner.'

We now discuss the transfer of the building to A. The building is worth $60,000 but is subject to a $30,000 mortgage. A's adjusted basis of his partnership interest is $15,000 plus his one half of the mortgage. Under the general rule, no gain would be realized, but here one of the exceptions is involved. By taking the building, A in effect gives up a portion of his interest in the unrealized receivables. He realizes a gain, then, to that ex-tent. His interest in the receivables: changes from one half to approximate-ly one eighth as he has given up 30/35 of his partnership interest. We have assumed that his partnership ratio changed accordingly.

The actual computation of the gain is rather technical. Suffice to say that A would realize ordinary income of approximately $7,500 by taking the building. The balance of the difference between the value of the build-ing and his partnership interest apportioned to the buildbuild-ing would not be subject to tax. The partnership would realize a gain to the extent that the value of the interest in the unrealized receivables given up by A exceeded the cost of the interest in the building given up by the partnership, as con-stituted after the transfer. This gain is allocated to the partners other than the distributee.'

A distribution of $500 cash to B would be in the nature of an ordinary drawing. Generally it would result in no gain or loss to him. Some ques-tions have been raised with regard to the disproportionate distribution of money. In that situation income might be realized. B's share of the cash here is thirty per cent of $4,000, or $1,200, which is in excess of his draw-ings.

The transfer of $1,000 accounts receivable to C may or may not result in a gain at the time of the assignment. If he takes it as a portion of his twenty per cent interest of $4,000 in the accounts receivable, he realizes no income at the time of the assignment. He realizes ordinary income when he collects the account. If he relinquishes a portion of his interest in the other assets, the partnership realizes a gain to the extent of the value of the inter-est relinquished. The following example shows how the computation is made of the amount a partner receives in excess of his share: If C con-tinues to have a twenty per cent interest in the $19,000 of section 751 prop-erty remaining in the partnership after the distribution, only $200 ($4,000 minus $3,800-twenty per cent of $19,000) of the section 751 property ceived by him will be considered to be his share of such property. The re-maining $800 will be in excess of his share. '

What is, the nature of the gain or loss when gain or loss is recognized? Section 731 (a) provides that any gain or loss on a distribution shall be con-sidered as a gain or loss from the sale or exchange of a partnership interest of the distributee partner. As a partnership interest is a capital asset, the

10U.S. Treas. Reg. § 1.751-1(b) (1) (1956). "INT. REv. CoDE oF 1954, § 751(b) (2).

"U.S. Treas. Reg. § 1.751-1(b) (3) (1956).

I'1d. § 1.751 (b) (1) (11).

[Vol. 18,

4

Montana Law Review, Vol. 18 [1956], Iss. 2, Art. 4

(6)

PARTNERSHIP OPERATION

general rule is that the gain or loss will be capital in nature." Gain attri-butable to the unrealized receivables and appreciated inventory is ordinary. Is the capital gain or loss long-term or short-term? There is no specific provision governing the holding period to be attributed to the interest in the partnership deemed sold or exchanged. However, present case law has established that this period begins to run from the date the distributee acquired his interest in the partnership."5

PARTNER'S BASIS OF ASSETS RECEIVED ON DISTRIBUTION

In regard to distributions other than in liquidation of a partner's inter-est and other than money, the partner's basis is the property's adjusted basis to the partnership immediately before such distribution, except that such basis may not exceed the partner's basis in the partnership.'

If there were no unrealized receivables, the building would have a basis of $45,000 to A computed as follows:

A 's cost basis in partnership ... $15,000 Liability assum ed ... 30,000

M aximum basis allowed A ... $45,000

This is less than the $50,000 basis to the partnership. However, the partnership has unrealized receivables upon which A may have realized a gain by taking the building. If so, we must adjust this basis for this gain. The basis then is increased approximately $7,500.

The $1,000 accounts receivable will have a zero basis in C's hands if it is considered as being a portion of his share of the unrealized receivables. However, if it is considered as being in relinquishment of a portion of his interest in the other assets, he receives a basis to the extent of the gain real-ized by the partnership at the time of the assignment.

As regards distributions in complete liquidation of a partnership, the basis of property (other than money) distributed by a partnership to a part-ner in liquidation of the partpart-ner's interest is an amount equal to the ad-justed basis of such partner's interest in the partnership, reduced by any money distributed in the same transaction.'

Section 732(c) explains the allocation of basis as follows: First, ap-portion to unrealized receivables and inventory items an amount equal to the partnership basis. (In our hypothetical partnership this basis is zero.) Secondly, allocate to any other distributed property in proportion to its ad-justed basis to the partnership.

A special election is available to a partner who acquired his partner-ship interest within two years prior to the date of distribution. The Secre-tary of the Treasury, by regulation, may require an adjustment under sec-tion 732(d) where the value of the property exceeds 110 per cent of the partnership basis. If you are dealing in appreciated property, check the

"INT. REv. CODE OF 1954, § 741.

'Thornley v. Commissioner, 147 F.2d 416 (3d Cir. 1945) ; Allan S. Lehman, 7 T.C. 1088 (1946), aff'd Commissioner v. Lehman, 165 F.2d 383 (2d Cir. 1948). Contra,

City Bank Farmer's Trust Co. v. United States, 47 F. Supp. 98 (Ct. Cl. 1942).

6

INT. REv. CoDE or 1954, § 732(a).

"1I. § 732(b).

(7)

MONTANA LAW REVIEW

Regulations on Section 732(d). It may be possible in some cases to avoid the 110 per cent of basis by adding a few assets to bring the ratio of market

to cost closer.

Where the partner's basis is the same as the partnership basis, and as-suming that upon liquidation each partner receives his proportionate share of each class of assets of the partnership, he will have a basis for each asset equal to the partnership basis. The same would be true of A if he withdrew fifty per cent of all assets for his interest in the partnership. The basis changes, however, to the extent that different classes of assets are taken. Remember, a disproportionate distribution with respect to unrealized receiv-ables results in income to the party who is deemed to have exchanged a por-tion of his interest in them for other property.

What is a partner's basis in the partnership after partial distribution? Section 733 provides that the basis of a partner's interest is to be reduced, but not below zero, by the amount of money distributed, and by the amount of the basis to the partner of distributed property other than money as de-termined by section 732.

When a partner uses the optional basis adjustment, section 734 provides the method of the adjustment; section 754 provides the manner of making the election; and section 755 provides rules for the allocation of basis.

If B sold his partnership interest to an outsider for $21,000, the new partner would have a basis of $21,000 for his partnership interest. No change, however, would result in the partnership 's basis in the individual assets. An election may now be made to have this difference in basis re-flected by the partnership with respect to the new partner. His portion of the accounts receivable would have a basis of $6,000; of the building, $18,000; of the library, $1,500; of the stock investments, $4,500; and finally, $1,200 of the accounts payable would not be deductible as to him when paid. The purpose of the adjustment is to reduce the difference between the fair market value and the book basis.

This election is continuing. As it is revocable only with permission of the Secretary of the Treasury, it should be considered carefully before being made. Later on there may be a transfer of a partnership interest at less than book value. If the election is in effect, the partnership assets must be valued downward in the same manner they were valued upward.

T'his election also covers the situation where a partner receives an asset having a basis to the partnership greater than the partner's basis in the partnership. You will remember that a partner's basis in a distributed as-set cannot exceed his basis in the partnership.

What happens to the difference between these two amounts? If no elec-tion has been made, this difference is lost. If the elecelec-tion has been made, the partnership may add this difference to a different asset of the same class. If it has no more assets of the same class, it holds the adjustment in suspense until such an asset is acquired. The two classes of assets are capital and non-capital. Example:

Partnership basis in building ... $50,000 A's basis in partnership ... $15,000 Mortgage ... 30,000

Basis of building to A ...-... $45,000

[Vol. 18,

6

Montana Law Review, Vol. 18 [1956], Iss. 2, Art. 4

(8)

If the election is in effect, the partnership may adjust the basis of the remaining assets in accordance with the rules provided in section 755.

Section 735 provides for the gain or loss on the disposition of assets re-ceived. Unrealized receivables result in ordinary income when collected. On inventory items held less than five years, gain would be ordinary income when sold. If those items are held over five years gain or loss depends on the nature of the asset in the hands of the partner.

Other assets depend upon their nature in the partner's hands. For a capital asset, the holding period of the partnership is added to that of the partner to determine whether the asset has been held over six months.

In our hypothetical partnership, A would have a capital gain on the sale of the building. C would realize ordinary income upon collecting the accounts receivable.

TRANSACTIONS BETWEEN PARTNER AND PARTNERSHIP

Under prior law it was not clear whether a partner was dealing as a stranger with his partnership or was dealing with himself to some extent. The new Code endeavors to clear this matter up.'

If a partner sells property to the partnership, he is taxed upon any gain realized and may deduct any loss, provided that-as to the loss-he does not own, actually or constructively, more than fifty per cent of the capital in-terest or profits inin-terest in the partnership.

The partnership can now realize a gain on the sale of assets to a partner, and also losses-except where the partner owns more than fifty per cent of the partnership.

Guaranteed payments, such as for services rendered or for the use of capital, are considered by the partnership as if made to a stranger. How-ever, such items are taxed to the partner in the year in which or with which the partnership's taxable year ends. Salary payments are not subject to social security taxes or withholding taxes.

Although, generally, gains and losses may now be recognized on sales between the partners and the partnership, a loss is not recognized where the sale is between the partnership and a partner owning more than fifty per cent of the capital interest or the profits interest in the partnership. The guaranteed payments are not a part of a profits interest.' Losses in trans-actions between partnerships where the same persons own, directly or

indi-rectly, more than fifty per cent each are not deductible.

Also, where the sale iq of depreciable business property held more than six months between a partnership and a partner owning more than eighty per cent of the partnership, the gain, if any, is ordinary income to the party selling. The status in the hands of the transferee is determinative as to the nature of the gain.

Ownership of a capital or profits interest includes constructive owner-ship as provided in section 267(c). Thus an individual is deemed to own any interest in the partnership owned by his family. Where a husband, wife and son are the sole three partners of a partnership, each is deemed to own, for these purposes, 100 per cent of the capital and profits of the jart-nership.

'INT. REV. CODE OF 1954, § 707.

(9)

MONTANA LAW REVIEW

TRANSFER OF PARTNERSHIP INTEREST

As mentioned before, an interest in a partnership is a capital asset. Gen-erally, therefore, a capital gain or loss results from a transfer thereof; ex-cept that ordinary income may result where there is a transfer of unrealized receivables or appreciated inventories.'

Under -the prior law, a capital gain resulted from the sale of a partner-ship interest irrespective of the underlying assets. Now the rules with re-spect to unrealized receivables and appreciated inventory items are much the same whether a sale or a distribution is involved. When such items exist, compute the tax costs before you advise your client to make the sale.

The basis of the transferee's interest will generally be what he paid for it. If he exchanges property for it, the normal rules of basis apply,

2DINT. Rav. CODE OF 1954, § 751.

[Vol. 18,

8

Montana Law Review, Vol. 18 [1956], Iss. 2, Art. 4

References

Related documents

Registration: Your organization must make an annual charitable registration filing with the Pennsylvania Bureau of Charitable Organizations if it solicits and receives gross

Librarians are aware of expanding undergraduate research on their campuses and are beginning to develop instruction to support student needs within the disciplines

The third cluster comprises 32 athletes with high results in beliefs that ability and external factors are causes of success, average results in both performance goals, the

Appreciated Property Distributions to Owners Generally, no gain or loss to partner or partnership on the distribution of appreciated property. Subject to rules of

Revenue Procedure 75-16, which contains a checklist of information and documents to be submitted with a ruling request on partnership status, makes it clear that

A cursory glance through GCSE marking criteria shows the weight given to the ability to engage personally with a text, and to express it, in writing, in terms acceptable to

There are many sources of compliance in serial robots: base, joints and links, as well as an active compliance induced by the position control loop. Generally, the compliance of