http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/
Original citation:Goldberg, Leslie Ann and Jerrum, Mark (1998) The 'Burnside process' converges slowly. University of Warwick. Department of Computer Science. (Department of Computer Science Research Report). (Unpublished) CS-RR-344
Permanent WRAP url:
http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/61057
Copyright and reuse:
The Warwick Research Archive Portal (WRAP) makes this work by researchers of the University of Warwick available open access under the following conditions. Copyright © and all moral rights to the version of the paper presented here belong to the individual author(s) and/or other copyright owners. To the extent reasonable and practicable the material made available in WRAP has been checked for eligibility before being made available.
Copies of full items can be used for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-profit purposes without prior permission or charge. Provided that the authors, title and full bibliographic details are credited, a hyperlink and/or URL is given for the original metadata page and the content is not changed in any way.
A note on versions:
Research
R.port
311
The
"Burnside
Process" Converges Slowly
L A
Goldberg. Nl Jerrum
RR344
We
considerthe problem
of
sampling"unlabelled
structures",i.e.,
sampling combinatorialstructures modulo a group
of
symmetries.The maintool
which has been usedfor
this samplingproblem is Burnside's
lemma. In
situations where a significant proportion of the structures haveno
non-trivial
symmetries,it
is
alreadyfairly well
understoodhow
to
applythis
tool.
Moregenerally,
it
is possible to obtain nearly uniform samples by simulating a Markov chain that wecall
the Burnside
process;
this is a
random
walk on
a
bipartite
graph
which
essentiallyimplements Burnside's
lemma.
For this approach to be feasible, theMarkov
chain ought to be"rapidly
mixing",
i.e., convergerapidly
to
equilibrium.
The Burnside process was known tobe rapidly mixing
for
some special groups, and
it
haseven been implemented
in
somecomputational group theory algorithms. In this paper, we show that the Burnside process is not
rapidly
mixing
in general. In particular, we construct aninfinite family
of permutation groupsfbr
which we show that the
mixing
time is exponential in the degree of the group.Departrnent of Cornputer Scicncc
University of Warwick Covcnrrv CV4 7AL
Unitcd Kin-cdorn
The
ttBurnside Process"
Converges
Slowly.
Leslie
Ann
Goldbergt
Department of Computer
Science
University of Warwick
June
11.Mark Jerrumf
Department of Computer
Science
IJniversity of trdinburgh
1998
Abstract
Wr: cclnsi<ler
thc
problern of saurpling "unlabellecl structures", i.e., sarnpling<:orniri-natorial
structrrres rnodr.rioa
groupof
synrrnetlies. The mairt tclol which has iretttruserl
fbl
this sarnplirrg problenr is Burrrside's lctnnta.In
situatiotrs where a signifir:arrtproportiorr of
thc
str"uctures have no ncln-trivial sytntnetries,it
is ah'eaclyfairly
wttllunclerstoocl hciw
to
apply
this
tool.
More generally.it
is
possibleto
olrtaitr trearlyunilbrm
samplesby
simulatinga
Markov chainthat
wecall the
Bruuside ploccss:this
is a, rarr<lonr walk on abipartitc
grapli which cssentially irnplctnents Bulrrsiclc'slcrnrna. For
this
approachto
be
feasible,the
Markov cltain oughtto be
"rapicllvrnixing",
i.e.. corrvclgerapidly
to
equilibrium. Thc
Br-rrnside process was krrown to berapidly
rnixingfol
sorne splecial groupsl arrclit
has everr been irnplernentecl in sotncr computational group theoryalgorithms.
In
this
paper) we showthat
the
Bttrnsicleplocess is not rapi<lly rnixing in gerreral. In particular, wc constrtrct an infinite ftrnrily
of pelnrutation groups for which we show
that
the rnixing time is exponcntial irr thcdegree of
thc
group.*R,esearc:h R,eport RR344. University of Warrvir:k. Coventrv C\''4 7AL. Unitccl l(iugdorrr. This worli
u';is sultportccl in p:rrt by tlie trSPRIT Working Group 21726 "R.AND2". :rnd BSPR.IT LTR, Proirrtrt 202'1-1
..ALCO\,I_IT''
i
lesl
ie@dcs . warwick . ac . uk,http
: //www . d.cs . warwick . ac .uk/-teslie,/.
Departrnent of OorrrltutelSr:ierrcc, University of Waru,'ick, Coventry, C\'r4 7AL, United Kingclorn.
1
Introduction
The
c:omputzrtional ta,sh c:onsidereclin
this
:rrtic:leis
that
of
sarnpling "unl:rbellerl
stnu'-lllr'cs".
i.r:..
sa,mplingcornlrirratorial
struc;turers rnocluloa
group
of svnrrnetlie..
\Vc
urlrli
lvithin
the
fiarner,volk cif P611'atheolv:
"Structures"
Aretakcn
to
trc length-rn
u'olcls ox:r'tl,
finite irlphabet
f,
t-urclthe
grotrp
of
svrnrnertriesis
takcn
to
ire
a,perrnutatiorr glorrlr
(/
of' <lt'gt'cc
rn
u,hit:h at:tsott the
rvorcls br.perrnuting
positions.
(Scc Scr:tion2
for' prercist'rlefinitions.) The
imageof
r-u€
I"'
underrg
is
convcrrtiorralll' derrotedoe.
\\iorcls r.- zinrl ,/are,' irr
the
szrnreorbit
rf there is
apelrnutation
g
€
G lvhich
maps clto
rv.q:
1J.The orbits
lrartition
the
set
of
r,vcirdsinto
equivzrlence classes. arrdthc
cornputational problem
is
tosanrplt: ll'orcls
in
such awav
tliat
eacliorbit
is cqually
likelv to
l;e output.r
Tlre
rrrairrtocil u'hich
has beerr useclfor
sanrplingorbits
rs Burn,,s'i,d,e.',s Lr;rn,rrt,u,.' n'hic'hsal's
that
cachoti;it
('onrcsup
Gl
tinres
(trsthe
first
c:omponent)in
ther setof'puirs
T(E,G)
;:
{(a. g)
| c,€ E"',
g
€ G
arrd ae-
.}}.
(t )Illrs.
\\(r
:u'c intr:rcstcclin
thr: computational problem
of
sarrrplirrgunifbrmlv
at
r':rnclonrfi'oni
I(X,
G),
given (an efficient
reprr:sr:ntat,ionof)
G.Wcilrnakl
[16] iras shorvn horvto
solvethis
sarnplingproblem
lor
rig'id
stnrr:tulcs.
That
is, he hzls given zrrr efficierrt randorn sanrpling
algorithm
that
works rvhcnever a highfiactiorr
of tlre
lrails
in
T(E,G)
haveg
equalto
the
identity permutation. \\brrnalcl's
rnctirocl cloesncit erxtencl
to
the
c:rsein
u,hichthe
identitl,
pelrnutzrtion corrtributesonlv
a small fiactiorr'to1'tlrc pairs
in
T(D.G).
Hor,vever. ,Jen'urn propcisecla
natulal
apploach
btrscclon
\,larkor.cha,in
sirnulation u'hich
cloes exterrcito this
tase
l7].\\'Io
givc
thc
clctailsof'the
N4arkor,'chainsirurlation:rpproacrh
in
Sectiorr2.
Irr
lrrit'f.
tht'i<lca
is
to
consiclerthe fbllorving
bipartite graph:
The
verticeson
thc
lcft-harrrl
side areall
u'olrls
r\ E"'.
Thc
r.crticclson
thc
right-h:rnd
sidc areall
permutaticirrsirr
G.
Thc.lcis
trneclge
fiorn
rvrircl rrto perrnutation
gif
arrdonly
if
(te:
o.
This
graph essentiallv inrlrlcrncrrtsBrrrrrsirle's Lerrrrna:
The
lenrrn:r shor'vsthat
the
st:rtiorrary clistribrrtion
of a
ra,nclorn u'alli orrthe gralrh
zrssigns eclualweight
to
eachorbit,
i.e.,
to
each unlabelleclstructurr:.
Thc
N{arkor. chain
that
r'r'e ccinsider. 'lvhich u'e ref'erto
asthe
"Burnsicle Drocoss" . isthc
lirnrlorrru,trlk
on
this
graph
obserr.eclon
a,lternzrte steps.\\'-c rnnv
obtirin
a rre:rllr.rrniform
urrl:rbellecl s:rmple b.vsirnulating the
Bulrrsicle ploccssfiorn a
fixecl
initial
state fur
srifficientlv
rnarry steps, anclreturning the final
statc.
Thc
eflicrierrcv of
this
sarnpling rnethod is dcpcndcnt onthc
so-calledrnixing
tirne of the Burrrsirkrprocrcss:
irr
lorrgh tr:rnrs,
horvmany
stepsis
"sufficientlv
manv"? Thc aim
cifthis
rutick'
rHere is a r:onr:rete erxample: Let X be a binary alphabet. Encocle the:rd.j:rcencv rnatrix of arr rr-r'r.r'tcx
gra1lhasawrlr'cItlf1crrgth,,,,:(!)).Thcrc1tx,artt1ler'rrrrrtatic-rrrgroripisthcgr'ilrrp(actingtlriri.tlrt1s)l.llit.1l is inclu<:ecl br'r 1h" group of :rl1 permutations of the ri vertices. Note that tu'o graphs are in the siirne or']rlt
if arrd unly if thev are isornorphic.
2Although this lerrrrrra is cornrnorrly ref'erred to ils "Burrisicle's Lerrrrrra",
it
is reall1' 611s to Caur:ln aurlFrobcrrius [13] .
..'.
':''S1.,er:ifit:a111', \\blm:,llci's approach can bc used whcn ther fiaction of pairs
in
I(X.G)
rvhich iire rlue tois
to
shrtr,l,that
thc mixing time of
the
Burnsicle proc;essis
scrnretimes\€I\r largc. \\'ir
nou'nrakc
that
staterncnt
precise.Fol
anv trvoprobability
distribrrtions
z- ancl zr' on afinite
set
f
, rlerfine thetotal
uo,r"i,a,t'i,ort,d,i,stott,r:r'. betr,veerr
r
atrcln'
to
beDr"(tr,r') '.:
r;.a; ln(,a)
-
zr'(l1)1:
;
I
z
!
l"{',)
-
r'(i)l
t:€ t!
Sr:pyrose /I,1
is an
errgodictrIarkov chain
with
state
spacef
and
stationaly
clistribrrtion
r.
arrrl
let tlrc l-step clistribution
of 11, rvhenstarte(l in
state:16, be n1. Thr: 'rn,'i,t:'i,n,q t'i,rrt,eol
f,[.
gir.err
initial
stette:r;s,is
afunction rro :
(0, 1)-+ N,
fronr
toler:rrrcresd
tt,isiutulatioti
titrtcrs.rlefinecl :rs
fbllou's:
for
each de
(0,1),
let rro(d)
bethe
smallestI
sttchthat D,.,(n1,.r)
16
frrr
all
t'
>
t.
If
the
initial
state
isnot
significant or is unknou'n,
it
isapplopliatt:
tc.r rlefirtcr(r))
-
rrrax'r,,(d),
rvhcrerthe
rrraximum
is ol'er
all
r e {/.
Rv
ropi,d, rn;it:'rrr,t1. \\'('Irl('?tlrthtrt
r(d) <
poly(rn.logd
I),
rvherem
is the
input
size
in
our
casetlte
clegrccrif
thegloup
G
anrl
d
the tolerance" Stuart
Anderson
has suggestedthc
phrasetorp'id
rn,'i,t:i,n,qto
dr:scribethe contrasting
situation
whcremixing
tirne is exponential
in thc input
size.The
Burnsidc
process u'as shou,rrto
bcrapidly
rnixin5; for some very special gto11l5G
[7]Hor.vever',
it
u,as an open questiorr r,vherthcrit
israpidly
nrixing in
getterzrl.Thc
plec:ise testtltof
this article
(Theorem
ll)
is aconstluction
of :rninfinite
farnilv
ofpernrutation
grottlts Gfirr n,liich
u,e shorvthat
the mixirrg tirne
r(f
)
i*,-xpc,nential
in
tht'clegreerof
G.
Thrts.if'wc
usc
the f-step distribution
to
estimate
the probability
zr(,4)of
someevellt
-{
C
tI/in
the
st:rtion:rr,vclistribution.
the result
ma1"be
out bv
asmuch as
d,
ttnlr:ss\\'c
takt'l
r.xlroriontiallv
Iarge.The main
ideaof the proof
is
to
relate the rnixing
time
of
the
Burnsicle processtti
thc
"Sr",,err<lsr:rr-Wang process", a
particular
dvnamicsfor thc Potts
rnorlelin
statistical
lritvsit:s.The
Sn'cndsen-\\'ang process was shownbv
Gore anclJelrurn
[5]to
have ex]ronentialttrix-irig
tirne
at
a
ccrtain critical
valueof a parameter called
"tetnperatule".
It
turns ottt that
thc
Su,enclsen-\\'ang process defineclon a graph
f
irt
a differrent(lou'el.
non-t:r'itic:al)terrrr-1rt:rature has cxacltlv
the
same dlrnamics asthe
Burnsicie process ott a clcrivecipernttttirtiott
glollp
Gr(f).
Thus
vn'e c,irrlr,'haveto
rclate the
Sr,venclsen-\Vang processat
tht:
tu,o cliffi:rerrttr:nrlreratures.
l,hich
we
do
using
the
"l-stretch"
constrttction
useclbv
othct'arrth,,r's
16l.The
clrrrranricsof
tlie
Su'endsen-Wang processis not perfectly
preservecllrv tht:
l-strett:hr:onstnrction,
but
tire
crirresponclenceis
close enoughto vield
the
cl:lirnccl t'r:sult.Sec:tions
2
ancl3
clescribethe
Burnside and
Sr,vendsen-\Vang processesrScction
.1rle-scribes
the
relatiorrship
betweenthe two;
Section
5
relates
the
Srn'cnclsen-Wang l)I'ocrcssat
tu,o
different
tcrnperzrturesvia the l-stretch
construction,
thus
r:omltleting
thcr"tor'pitl
rrrixing"
proof;
finall-v,Scction 6
concluclcswith
some open problems.2
The Burnside
process
Lcrt
J -
{0,
on
frnl
-
{0.gr'olu)
G
hiLs zrrratural action
orrthe
setX-
of
all
lvorrlsof lcngth rn ovel
thc
alphalret,J.
irtclttcc<l
bv
pcrrnrrt:rtions
of
thc
"positions"
0,..
. )Tn-
1.
Under
this
irrrhrceci ar:tiorr. thelrertrrut:ttiott
g
€
G
rnapsthe
rvorcl(r.:
e,yo,t...o,trt,-rto the
u'orciae
:
lJ
-
bsbl...b,,,,1
rlefirrerl
b}'
bi
-
a;
for
^ll
i,,;j
e
[rn]satisfying
i,rt: j.
Thc
action of
G partitions
f
"'
irrto
uttutnlrf't
of
rtrbl,ts, these bcirrgthe
equiv:llence classesof
E'"
unrler the
equiva,lerrr:elclatiorr
that
ictentifies or an<lii
whcrrcver tirere existsg
e
G nrappingo;to
i3. Theorbit
{cye : qe
G}
contaitring
thc
rvorcln
€
E'"'is
denotcrl ry(r. As we indicatedin
theintroduction,
Burnsicic'sLernrnasavs
that
eachorbit
comesup
lGl
timesin
theset
I(f
,G)
defirredin
ccluatiorr (1).Tlrus.
\\re zrreinterestcd
in
the problem of
unifblrnly
sarnpling elcrnerrtsof
T(E.G).
A
sta,nclarclattack
oncombinatorial
sarnpling problerns [9]is
to
clesign a\.falkov
c:htrirrlvlursr:
states are
thc
structures
of interest (in this
c:rsethe statc
spaceis G)
zrrrd n'hosctlansition probabilities ale
chosen sothat
the st:rtionarv
distribution
is
thc
rerclrirercisirrn-piirig
distlibutiorr.
Thc
follcirvingrrnttrral
N'{arkovchain
was proposcdbyJernrrn
[7].
Aslr,c ttotccl
irr
thc
introcluction.
it
is
essentiallv alandom
r,valk orrtht
bipartite
glaph
u,hiclit:onr:sponcls
to
Bru'nsicle's Lernrrra.The state
spaceof
the
N'larkor. chzrin ,1/s-
Ilrr(G.
t)
is .jrrst
C.
The transition plobabilities
ficirn
a
state
q
€
G ale
spet;ifieclbv the
foll<xvingc:orrceptuallv
simple tu'o-stcp
experirnent:(B1)
Sarnple rvttnifolnrly at
ranclom(u.a.r.)
fi'ornthe
setFix
q::
{u
€
Eu':
ae-
r-y}.(B2)
Sanrplch
u.a.r'.liorrr
the poirrt stabiliscr
G,,t:
{lt
e
G,
nr'
:
,,}.
The
rreu'stzrteis
h.
Algorithmicallv.
it
is
not difficult
Lciimplcment (B1).
Hor,r,cvcr'. Stelr(82)
is
appzrrentll'
dilficult
in
generai.
(It
is
ccluivalentunder
lanclornisedpolvnornial-tituc
lt:tlucrtiotts l,c-rthe
Setuti,se Stabilzser proLrlerrt, r,vhich incluclers Gru,plr, Isornorpl'r'is?/, ?rs irspecial crase.) Nevertheless,
there
aresignificant
classesof
groupsG for
u'hich
:rn effir:ir-.rrt(lrolvrrornial
tintc)
irnplcmcntatiott exists. Luks
has shorvnthat
p-gloups
gloupsiri
u,hir:lrevelv
elentent h:rs orcler a po\\'er ofp
for
someplirnep
is an cxarnple of such a t:lass [10].Retru'ning
to
the
N4zrrkov chainitself.
wc lrotcimrnediatelv
that I,In
is ergodic, sirrcr:cr'-elr,' stzrte
(lrerrnutation)
catr be reachcdfrom
everyother
irr a singlctransition,
b1' sclcr:tingtlrc'r,r,rrrcl
o
:
0"'in
step
(81).
Lct
r
:G
-+
[0, 1] clenotethe stationarv clistribution of
,111i.Thcn
n(q)
is propot'tiotral
to
tire
degreeo{ r'ertex
g in
therbip:rrtite
graph
colresporrtlirrgtcr Burttsicie's
Lemma, which
is
I Fixgl
:
1,'''\ut.u'hele
c'(rl) dernotcsthe
rrurrrbelof
cyr:lcs irrthr,r
lrelrnrrtation
q.
!\b
havethelctblc
establisiredthe fbllorving
Lerrrrnafrorn
[8]:Lemma
L
Let
r
br: th,e ,stu,ti,ort,a,r"ydist'ributto'n
of
th,e Mal'A:or; r:h,ain X,IR(G,t).
Tlr,r:lt,r(s)
:
k'(te)llT(D,G)l
Jor
a,llg
€
G.Although
the
\'Iirrktx'
chain,l/s
onG
istirc
most convenient one fclr usto
rvorklvith.
it
is t;lcar
that
lr,c cAninvert
the otder
of steps(B1) and
(82) to
obtain
adual
N,'Iarkor, chairrI\G.f)
u'ith
st:rte
spacef"'.
The
clual\,larkov chain'l
hls
greaterprac'tical appcal.
asil
givcs airnifrtrrn samplcr
for orbits
(i.c., unlabeiled stluctures):
a hr
Lemma
2
Let
n'
lte tlt,e .sto,t'iort,a,r"u d,i,silributi,on, oJ th,r: Mo,r'k:,o'u ch,a,'in,IILG,
t)
Tlr,r:rr,/r \Ll ,/ - lGl
ia'rl
Ir(r.
G)l
frtr
a,l,l,u €
D'"';
'irr,pa,rtir:ulor,'tT'
o'ss'iqn's eq'ual probabi'li'tuttt
eo,clr' r,tt'ttitt{;
.T|e
rcsult
zrgairr fbllor,vsfi'oni
a
consiclcrationof the
random
rvalkon
the llipartite
gralrii,using
the
elernentzrrygloup-theoretit:
fact
that lG*i
x lo"l
:
iG!Pctr:r
Cameron has
observcdthat
a
\,'l:rrkovch:rin
similar
to
i\,1i ntav
btr ck:fitrt:<l firl 2111,grollp
zrction,not jrrst the
special
caseof a pernttttation
llloltp G
at'tirrg
oll
I"'
lx'
petlrrurtaticirrof positions. Irr the
generalsetting: givcn a poittt
rv. sclecrtll.a.t^
i)
gl'o111)gfutment .q7
that
fixesa,
atrclthen
selecta
point
that
is fixeclby
g^Thus,
thr: gertcrzrlistrtionof
,11i,to albitrary
grollp
zrctionsprovirles a
pott:ntialll'
efficient
ploc:cdttrefor
rrni{ornilv
sa,rrrpling rrnlabellerl
stnrcturcs
(i.e., samplingstntcturcs
llp to
svrnrnctrr').
This
ploi'cclttlt'
fias
lrer:n irnplemerrteclin
certain
algorithrns
for
cletermining
the
conjugzlc:v c]a,sses clf' :ifinite gloup
[15]Of
course,thc
effectivenessoI
XIi
(equivalently
,\,1s) as :r basisfor a
pietteral pttt'1;ostrsarnpling
1-llor:t-:durefor
urrlnbclled structures
depenclson
its
rnixing
tirne.
It
rvirs kttttu'lrtliut l.Is
mixes
rapicllv
in
some special cases(scr:.Jerrum
[7]).
but
it
rvasttot
pt't:r'iottslvkncx,r,n
n'hethcr
,4/s mixesrapidlv for all
grollps
G.
Specificallv.it
\\rasnot
knou'rt s'hcthert'tire nrixing
timc
of
,\1s(G.I)
isuniformlv
bounrled Liv a polvncirnialin
rrr',tht:
clegrcc o{'G'.T[c
resrrlt
in this alticle is
a
c:cinstructionof
an
infinite familv of permtttation
grottlrs firr'u,hic:h n'e shou,
that
thc
rnixing
tirrreof
,['fs
growsexlronentiirllv
irrthr:
clegrelc nt.3
The
Swendsen--Wang process
As
noteclin
the Introduction) our strategy is
to
relate the
rnixirrg
tirne of the
Bttrnsitlepr'o(:css
to
that of thc
Su'endscn-Wzrngprocess.
Irr this
sec;tiott u,edcsctibe
tltt'Iirtttrt
l)rocess.
lvhich
providetsa particular
cl-vnarnicsfor
the
q-state
Potts tnoclel.
In
fiitrt.
u'e'rrcc<l
onlv
consiclerthe
sPercial r:zrse Q:
3.
Seer\4artiu's
booh
[12]lbr
bac:kgrourr<lott
tirtrPotts
tttoclel.A
(3-state)
Potts
system is defineclby
zrgraph
I : (li
E)
ancl a real nttrnbet' ("ittt'ert'seltt:rnpelature")
il.
Fcir cornpactness. lvewill
sornetimes denotean
eclge(i,l)
e
E
lx'i7.
A
rttrr.fi4uroti,ctn, t>f
the
sy5;11111is an
assignmento
:I,'
-+
{0,1,2}
of "spirts"
rtr r:oLou,r'sto tlle
vr:rtic:es
of
f.
The
set
of
all
3li"l
possibleconfigurations
is
clenotccl b1'f/.
!\ir:
associatc:r:aclr
configuration
o
e
Q
with
an
crnergyH(o)
::
Dn,ro
[t -
a1o(r;,"(f))].
u'hered
istirr:
Kroner:ker-dfunction
rvhich
is
1
if
its
arguments are eqtral,
ancl0 othelu'istr.
Tlnrsthc
enelgv
of
:rconfiguration
isjrrst the
nurnber
of
eclges connec:tingunlike
c:olottrs.Tlte
(Boltzrrrann)
utei,gh,tof a
configura,tiono
is
exp(-[]
H(o)).
The
parti,ti,ort, .frt,nc:ti,orrof
t]ttr3-stal,e
Potts
rnoclcl isZ:
Z(f
,0),:
I""o
(-
ilH("))
o€A
it
istlrc
nolmalising
fzrctorin the
Gi,bbs d,i,stri,bu,ti,on on configurzrtions, rvhich ussignsprob-irlriiitv cxp(-iJ
H(o))lZ
to
corrfigrrtzrtiotro.
To:rvoid
the
exlrorrentials. rvcu'ill
clt:finc thr'r:rl,gr: utr:'i,glt,l
)
ofthe Potts
systemto
bee-ir,
sothe
partition function
(2)
ma1. bercu,rittcrr
S
Z
:
Z(f
,))
: I fl
)it-'rt"t;),"(.r))1.o€9 ijeE
Tlnrs the u'eiglrt of
acorrfiguration is
)'D. rvhele bis the number of bichromatic
Tlre
Srvenclserr-\V:rrrg process specifies a N,{arkov chzritr l1s1y(f
,)
) on O.
Let
Pcittsconfigrrrirtion
be clerroteclbv
o.
The next configuration
o'
is cibtzrinecl as(3)
eclgers. the currcut
fbllou's.
(S\\'1)
Let
.{
:
{.'i;je
E
:o('i):
"(j))
bcthe
set of rnottochrorrtatic edges. Seiect tr sttbset-{
a
J
bv
retainirrg
cach eclgcin
J
indcp,'ndt'ntlv
rvith probabilitv
1.r:
1-
,\.(S\\r2) The graph (.[..A)
consistsof a
rmrnbel
of
corurcctcdcornporrcrrts.
Frir
erachr:on-net:tecl
component,
a,colour is
choscn u.a.r'.fi'orn {0.
1,2}.
anclall
veltices
u,ithirrthe
c:onrponent are assignedthat
colour.That thc
N'Iarkov r;hainwith
transitions
defined bvthis
experiment is ergodic is irnnrr:riiatr::that
it
has
the
collett
(i.e.. Gibbs) distributiorr is
not
too clifficult
to
shor,v.
(Sercr,lbr
erxilrnple. Echva,r'cls
and
Sokal l3l.)4
The
relationship
between
the Burnside
process
and
the
Swendsen-\Mang
process
Lel
J
bc afinite
alpirabet
of'size ft. zrndlet
f :
(t'. E)
be an urrclirected graph clefining a3-statc Potts
svsternrvith
eclgc rvcight): k-'.
\\reu,iil
constnrct
arr assocri:rtcrlpcrrnuttrtiou
group
Gr(f
)
sttcltthat
the
d1'namicsof the
Burnside
processon
(G3(f).I)
is
c'sst:trtiallr'the
s:rrneas
the
Su'endsen-W:rrrg clynarrricson
(f, )).
This
corrstruction
genelzrlises ir crirrstnrr:tionfi'orn
[7].which
dealsrvith
the
casek:,:2
(i.e.. the
binary
alphabet
c:ase).Tlrc
prerrnutationgroup
Gr(f
) acts onthe
setA:U"en
/.,,
r'r,hich isthc
clis.joirrt nrriorrof
tlrnrt'-r:lc'rncrrt sets/..
Arbitrarill'oricnt
thc
cdgcsof
f.
sothat
cacrh cclgc r,€
,E htrsa
clcfincclstart-vertex
e
;rncl encl-verrtexc+.
For e
€ E
and
u
€
I/,
clcnotcbv
ft,,, sonicfixerl permrrtiltiorr
that
inc'luces a 3-cycle on/.
ilncl leavesevervtliing
else fixecl. ancl clenott'bv
ry, thc. generator9''
":
II
l't"x
II
h';-''
e..C:', -l' e.e =1)
Firririlv,
ckrfincGr(f) : (g,:i;
€
V),
thc
group
gr:nr:ratcdby
{g,,}
Observe thzrt
thc
gcnclators
of
G3(f)
commute
:rndliave
orclerthlee.
so eac:hl)elrlur-ter,tiorr
ll
e
Gt(f
)
canbc
cxprcsscd asg:
g(o),:
fl
!Juo(u)- fl
/i""(.*)
"1"
Il€l' e€E
u,lrcre
o
:
V -+
{0,
1.2}.
Provided
the
graph
f
is
connccted.this
expressiotris
erssc'trtiallr'c:iirrrtnic:rrl,
in that o
is uniclrelv
cletcrmineclup
to
adclition
(rnod3) of
aconstirnt
fttttrrtiott.To
sccrthis,
notc
thzrtg uniquell,'detcrnrines the
exponentof
h..in
expansion(a). u'ltich
iti
trrln
cletcrrtrinesthc
clifl'erence betrveenthe
colours (viervecl as integcrs)at
thc
enclpoittts <;f'crlge
c.
Note
that
all
threteof'the
configurations
associatcclu,ith
.g irrcltrccthe
stttttt't*r
J
in
(S\\i1).
Thus, the trilnsition
probabilities
from the
thrce configuratiotts
aretltc
sillllo.arrcl lr,c can
thelefbre
think
of
.g asbcing
associateclu,ith all
thrce
corrfigttrations.Lemma
3
Sup2tosef
is
o, graph,E
o' ,fini'te alphabet. o,ndlet
k
: lDl.
Tlten,tfB(G3(f),
t)
=
-tf.*(f
.A'-');
tlr,tlt i,s
to
su,'rt, eu,r:lt,'pertmt,to,ti,ong
'i,rt, tlr,e stu,te spat:e oJ X4ya(Gr(f ) ,E)
cu'rt' br: u,ssrtr:i'tt,tri, ttt'i,tlr,rt:uc:tl,r1 tlr,r'ee con.fi4ura1i,on,,s i,n, the .sto,te ,syto,r:e
of
Msys(f,k-2)
i'rr .str,r'ho
ttttttl th,rt,t tru,'n',si'ti,on,7t rob u bi,l,i t'i,r:s o,r'e- p'res eru ed,.
Proof.
\\,Ie ilssociate eachpermutation
g
€ Gr(f')
witli
three configuratiolls
as rlcst:riberrl2lievt
.
As
lve obsr:rveri.the transition
probabilities of
the
tht'eecortfigurations irr S\\''
a,rtriderntical.
Pcrhaps thc
t,htist:in
,l\rIs is(B2))ri'ith
that
r:oirpled vcrsiort.assoc:izrtecl
rvitlt
(C1)
Sarnpica
l.:{r:€
(C2)
Sarnple heasiest
way
to
show
that
thesetransition probabilities ale thc
satne ast6
cornlrine
the expeliment
clefiningthe
Bulrtsicle
proccss (see(B1)
arrtldefining the
Swendsen-\\'ang process (sec(SW1) and (S\V2))
into
a sitrgltrStart
rn,iththe
pair (g,or),
lvhere o.,
is
otteof
ther tltrr-'econfigtrlatiotts
!1.
rr.a.t'.
front the
set
Fixg
:
{u € E"'
: (\!t
:
rr}
of
rvorclsfixeri
}-x'17' Lr:tE'.
r,-ts
not
coustant on
/.).
Thc pair
(.,A)
is the intelmcclitrte
state.rl.a.r.
frorn
the point
stabiliser
G,":
{h,e
G,a" :
a}.
Tlrc
rrerv yrair is (1t,, o1,) (agairr. choose o7,arbitrat'ily
frorn the thrce configurtrtions assot:it'tttrrirvith
/r.).Bv constnrction, the
transitiorrs
g
-+
a
-+
h occul
rn'iththe probabilitics
dicrtiitccl br'(81)
trnd
(B2).
\Ve nrust
chechthat
the
inclucedtransitions
olt
)
A
-+
o1,trlatt:lt
(S\\r1)anci
(S\V2)
in
probabilitv. Let
c
:'ti,r)
€
E
be any
eclge,attd
consiclerthe actiott
of'17orr
y',,.
II'o,,(u)
-- oo(t)
tlien thc
action of
g
on
/"
is the
iclentit-v, anclprobabilitv
that
rris
ccrrrstant,ot
A"
is
A;2.
Thus
the probabilitv
that
e
€
A
is
1-
A
2. irrtlcpettdetrtof
ther6thc'r'eclge choiccs, ?ls
rcquiled
bV (SW1),
where): k
2.
Otherr'i'ise, o,r('u)f
o.,(u)
trrrdthe
ar:tiorrof g on
21"is
a
3-c5rcle. Necessarily.a
is cotrstant
olt
/n,
artd
r t'
-{.
agairi
asrccluilecl
bv (S\\i1).
Sothe distribution
of
,4C
E
is
correct.To
r.crif'-vthc
seconclstep. again
let
e
:
u,t:€ E
be any edge.
If
e.e
,4 therr
riris
tttit
6grrst1nt
o\
A,,, entailing th:rt the action of
h
on
/"
is thc identit;-
atrclo1(t)
:
ot,(u).Conr,r:rseh,,
tf
r:(,4
therr
ryis constant
on
/",
and o1(t,)
-
o1,(t:)is unccittsttaittcd.
TltttsIr,
r)
o1,, is a bi.lec:tionfronr
G,,to
configurationstliat
are constant otr c:ortlter:te'tltorttlr()Il('llts
5
Torpid
mixing
\Ve have set:n
that the
Burnside
proc;cssis
equivalent tci ther Srvenclsen-\\ang processat
ii1'l:rrtiittlar
erlge-u'cight):
and
it
is
knorvnthat
the
Srvendscrr-\\,ang process at,a
d,i.fe:.'rert,tcclgc r,r'eight (rvhich
is
approximaterly1-
(41n2)111,'], rvhereI'is
the r.crtcx
setof
f)
hasexponetrtial rnixirrg
tirne f5].
In
this
section webridgc
the
gap betr,veenthe
cliff'ererrt crlgcrvr:ights.
Dettote
by
P7thc path of
length
Lor
l,-pa,t\
i.c.. the
gr:rphrvith vcrtex
set
il
*
1l
arrclrrrlgc sr.t
\{i,.i,+
1}:0
< I < l}.
Lemma
4
Con,si,rl,er o, r'u,n,d,omly sarnpled rnrt,.ft,quro,tion o,f th,e !l-stu,tr: Pott,s rn,od,el, ort, P7ul'i'th,t.d,geuei'gh't)'.Th't:i'n,d',uced'distri'bu'ti'on'o'ft:ol'o,u'r',son,th'ettL'sor:,rt't],
'i,rlr:rrti,r:a,l
to
th,e d,istri,buti,on oJ con,.figul'uiions o.f the|-state
Potts
rnodel onPy
(:
Iiz)
u'itlrr:dttr:'tur:.'i,oh,t
\ri
\.-
(1+2))r-(1
-))'
(L
+
z))r+
2(1-
)),
(r)
Proo.f.
Dcfinc'ur(l)
€
IR2to
be the vector
whoscfirst
(respectiverlv.sccond)
conrporrent',,,,!') 1."r1.,.ctively. 'u,l')1
ir
the
total
wcight of
those corrfigurationson
P7 rn,hose (orclcrcrl)errrlpoints ha,r'e colorrrs
(0,0)
(rcspcci,ivel-v.(0,1)).
Clearlv,
thc.rcis nothirrg
specialin
thc
lrartir:ttl:rr
citoice cif'colouts;
the
pair
(0.0)
could be
replaced b_vany
pair of
lihe
c:olours.ancl (0.
1)
lx.
anv
pair
of
rrnlike orres. Introducc.thc matlix
t
- \.r
(t
\+^)'
2^ \
a
straightfbrrvarcl incluction on
I
establishcs,t,(r)
- r,f
1)
\{r/
Tht' rnatrix
T
has cigcnvalues 1-
,\
and
1-r
2).
Introducer tr,vofirlther
rnatriccsD-(I
^
",,) ard q-(2-
l)
\ o r-2^)
"
\-t t)
'fhcn
T
-
SDS
1 ancl hcnr:cTI:
SDtS"r.
Noting that
ni 1
;
r)
(i
,')'
u,c clbtain
,1'/,
-
sD,
s
(1,)
_I((l+2)tt t2(t
-r\tt
l2^)/-(l
-^;,)
-))r\
(6)to
zrsinglc
cdgr: rvithT
Sincr.. P7
is
equivalent
in the
serrseof
the
statenrentof
thc
lcrrtrnrrDerrote b-y I{,.@ Pr
the
graph obtairredfrom
the cornplete graph onri
vertices bvsulrtlivirlirrg
cacrh eclge
by I
-
1internrediate
verticesof
degrectrvo.
Thus
ezr,ch edgeof
1{,'
becrontes iriIi,, &
Pl
ur copv ofthe
l-path P/.
\\,'e referto
the
vertices of dcgree rl-
1 as r::rtcr''i'or vtrtt,i(resarr<l
tlrose
of
clcgreetlrro as znteri,o'r.
(Assume rr,)
3
to
avoicltrivialities.)
\\rer rernarhlhirt this
constructirin
is.just the "l-stretch".
useriin
rt:lateci situzrtions b-y.- ,lacger.\iltigarr
ancl
\\'elsh i6l" The l-stretcli
operzrtion allows usto
rnove betlr,ct-'trdiff'crent
erlge u'r:rghts"at
least
if
r,i'eforget for
a
rnornelt the
specific dvtramics irnposcclbv the
Su'enrlsr:n-\VtrngI)r'ocess.
Lemma
5
Con.si,d,er a rct,rt,rl,omly sam'pl,ed configu,rati,on, ctf the 3-sta,tePotts
rnod'el' o'n'|i,,6
P1 rp,i,tlt erlgr:. uezqlr,t
).
Th,e i,rt,d,u,ced d,i,,stri,bu,tiort, of colou,r's o'nth,r: er;teri'or rte.rti'rt:,s o.[|i,,6;P,
,i,si'r]'ert'ti'ca'|'tot|ted'i'.str'i'btt,t,t'on'o'frnrt',fgu,ro"ti'onsofth"e,"J-sttl'tePr'ltt.srn,od'elort'Ii,,utr,:'irlh,t
\,
uh,erei : i(i)
i,s us i,n (5).Proo.f. Srrppose
o
is anv Potts
configuration
on the
graph
K,,
8
P7. anclS is
anv
sttbst:tof
its
vertices.
Denote
bv
ols
€
{0, 1,2}^si
the
restricticin
of
o
to
thc
set
S.
Thlor.rgltsgnre
elemctrtary
algebraicnranipulatiorr,
rve ma)' expressthe
partition
f\rrrc:tion cif :r Pott,ssvstenr
on
1{,,I
Prin ternts of the partition function of a Potts
svstemon
1{,,u'ith
eclge1vcight closer
to
1. In
ther fbllor,vingmanipulation,
we assuntethat thc
vertictrsof
li,,8
Prarc
nrrrnberecl 0, . . . ,A'
-
1 and
that
the cxterior
vertices receil'e
nurnlrersin tltc
rztllge9... n
-
7. Furthermore,
LIi,C
iAr] denotesthe
setof
I
- l
interiorvertice-s
lvingon
tltc
l-path
betr,r,ccn ext,erior vertic;cs z, andj,
and
-U;, denotesthe
setof
etlgcson that'
lrtrth.Z
(K,,
8, P1,))
- \- Tl ,lll
./2 LL d(o(u)'d(/'))o 1l.te L
oltu\
\-./---)
d I t,,l
\-
/ro lrit
rtt(
( n
trlr-d(o(u)'a(''))l\
uu€Eo.:-,t("(?),,1(,,))])
"
,^,'-',",",'",",,,)
)[r
,
)ll-d(o(,),"(,,))f
)
(",,
il
ut€811
o L,o,t
tt
V
\ o aro.til
0<i.<is
il
8,,. z
ol(',,_2,,, t
uu€ Er. - 2.,r- 1
,,- 2,r, I 1tl(
6,
iIt
a(o(;),o(j))Jn*r)l2
z(K,,.^),
u,hert:
C
is a constant
(actualll''r[')1.
fn.
penultirnate
eclualit-v abovc usesLenlnitl
-1.Let
o €
{0,
I,2}"
be anv configuration on
1d,.
Frorn
the
zrbovemanipulation.
lt'crseer
t,lrat
thc
r,veightof
the configuration
6
on
K,
is
equal
modulo the
constattt
t:rt:torC'tt(tt-t)/2
to thc
srrrnof the
r,veightsof
configur':rtirinso
of
lin
I
Prthat
ilgl'ec rT'ith6
onLemma
6
Thl:r'e eri,sts u,rt,tlta,t
,for
ull
pu,'i,r',s, utt,e'rr: )(1,)Proof. The firnction
1-to
be thr,- unicluenatural
'i,nfi,rr,i,te seq'u,ert,ce of poirs
(rr,l)
:
{(n(l)
,1,) : l,:
1,2,3
w
I
suclti.,
de,ft,n"cl ,t.sin
(5).)(l)
decreasestnonotonir:ally
to
0,
asI
--+oc.
Gir.cnl.
choosc rrnurnbel
satisf-ving(r-io;)
-#
Jlrr2
llrr2
-<l-)(/)
<-rr(/)+l-
rr(l)The
uppel
trrrcllou'el
bourrdsdiffer
bv
lessthan
3ri(l)-z
n
Let
{)
be the
set
o{
configuraticinsof
t}re 3-state
Potts
model
orrK,,6 4.
Fol
eac:lr ccrnfigurationo
€ f/,
clefine1(o)
e
IRi be
the
3-r'ector
r,vhoselth
corrrporrerrtis the
lrlo-pottiott
of
exteliol
vet'ticesof
K,,EPr
givencoloul
ibv o.
Then
lct
f/1.1 1(e) (respectivelr,.Qa11(e)) <lenote
the
setof configurations
o
suchthat 1(o)
licsrvithin
an s-bzrll c:entlecl at(.+,+,+)
(respectivelv, oneof the
thlee
e-balls centreclut
(3,;,*),
(*,3,*),
u.
(i
*.31t
Lemma
7
Let
a
corr,.ftg'u,r'a,ti,ort,o
be sarnpled,frorn
the ,9-statePotts
rn,od,e.l, on, K,,,E Pr
u;'r,tlt,e.d,ge utei,gh,t,
),,
a,n,rl su,pposetha,tI
- l(l) :
(z1ln2)ln,+O(n 2).
Tlt,err,,.forurry:
)
(.):(i)
Pr(o
e
!)r rrie
))
-\l(rr'2):
lii)
Pt'(o
(
!)a,1,,(;))-
O(rr
2):
untl('i,'i,'i,)
Pr(o
f
Qr,r,r(e)J
ga,Lr(E))
: .
o(,).
Th,e
ilnplitii
r:on,sta,rr,ts dr:pertd orr)u ort. e .Proo.f. B,v
Lernrna
4.
r,r,enrav equivalentlv
u'ork
u'ith
the Potts
moclr:lon
1{,,
rvith
crlgcu,eight
)(l).
\\''lrerr
1- l(/) :
(41rr 2)1n,,i.e.. the error ternr is
0.this
is
preciselythe resnit of
Gorearrcl .Jcrrurn
i5, Prop
3].
See:rlsoBoilob:is,
Glirnrnett
ancl Jarrsorr[1]. Thc
valiclitv
of'thc
lrrorrf given
in
[5] is rrnaff'ecteclbv
the errorterrn:
an aclditiveerror
O(n,-'z1in)(l)
translu,tcsto
arracldilil'6'pelturbzrtion
O(n,-r)
irrthe
function./ in
15, eq.(2)].
This perturbatiorr
rrlA\rbe absolbccl
into the
error
terrn
/
zrppearingirr
that
equation. lvhich is
Q(1).
tr
\\i'
nor,r'neerl
to
c:ornparethe
clvn:rmicsof the
Slvendsen-\\'arrg processe-qorr
Ii, I
P7
tuxl ft-,,.
rnore
precisely,the
Ntlarkovchains
.1y's1y(-If,A
P/,^)
and
,4,tfs1y(1i,,^). Thc
(;ol'r'osporxlerrce
rvill not
Lrccxact,
asin
Proposition 3,
but
it
rvill
ber close enoughfor
orrrpllrposes.
L<,,t, Q,.,, clr:notc
the
standarcl lanrlorn
graph is
forrrreclby
2144ttr*, inclcpcnclcntlvveltices
(2,.i).
an
cdge c;onrrectingI
arrcl y.gr:rph
rnoclelirr
rvhic:han
undircctccl
z-r.crtcxu,ith probability'p, fbr
each urrcirdereripair
ril'Supptrse
that p
<
dlu,
rvith d
(
1 tr constant.iurcl
f
is
selecterl accordingto
the morlcl 9,,0.
It
is
a classicalresult
tltiit,
rvith
lxolralrilitl
terrclirrg
to
1 asu
-+
cn)the
connct:ted componentsof
f
all
have sizcO(1ogr"). \\re
rtrrlttitt'a (firirlv
r:rucle)large
cleviation vet'sionof
t,his result.Lernma8Letfbe,selcr:terJa,r:cord,'in11
totLr,e'nt,od,el,9,,p,Il)h,e'r't:Stldfua,n,d0<d<1
i,,s o, r:on,5tant. Th,en, th,e proba,bi,Litu th,a,tf
conta,i,n,s a, cornponen,tof
si'ze erreetlilr,t1,fi
i,,exp(
-0(f
)).
Proof.
This
result
in
exactly
this fbrm
appeal'sas
15,Lemrna
4].
SeeO'Corrrrell
i1-1.Thrn 3.1]
for
a
mur:h
more
preciselarge-deviation
result
for
thc
"giartt
comyront:nt" of'zr sl)zrrse
lanclom
graph.
tr
\\'Ie also neecl:
Lemma
9 (Hoeffding)
Let
Zt,.
..,
Z"
be'i,ndepen,dr:'n,t'r.u's tu'i,th, ct,o{
Z;
I
bi, .for' ,srt,itublr:rn'rlstrt,n,t,s (t,;.,b,;, u,rr,d o,ll 1
<
i
< s.
Aiso
let
Z
-
Li=t
Z'.
Th'err,t'or tnu
l
>
0.Pr
(2
-
Exlr2t
>
4
(
exlr(-'r,'
I ,,0,-
,,,)')
'\/L""/Proof.
See N'IcDiarrnid [11,Thm
5.7].I
Lemma
lO
Let
u, c:c.tn.fi,grt,r'a,ti,ono€
I
be su'mplerl,Jrornth,e S-statr:Potts
rn,od'el orr'Ii,,8P1
ui,tlt, erl,qr: 'utei,gh,t
),
o,n,cl, s'u'ptr)ose tlr'at| -
^(1)
:
(4hr2)ln +
O(" ').
Let
o'
€ {)
lte tlr,e: yt:sultof
upplyi,n,g oTt,o str,:pof
th,e Sut:'rt,dsen,-Wo,n,q pr'oce,ss, ,sta,rtt'rt'g u,to.
Tlr,r:rr,.,for urtL1.>t,.
Pr(o'
e
gr,t
'(.)
|o
€
Ay1.{t))
:1-
r:-o(nfi).
a,rt,d,Pr(o' €
9.t.t.t(u)
l"
€
Oa11(t))
:1-e
a(ua).Tlt,e ilrr4tl'i,ci,t corr,sta,n,ts d,epend' orr'ly on
t.
Proof.
For
ri."7cxterior
vt:rtices
ctfK,,
Q P1 satisf-r.'ingo(i)
:
o(i).
Pr(Path
i, <+;iis
monochrornatic)
: * :
u',!')
u,hclc the
scconclcclualitv is
fiom
(6). After
step
(S\V1),Pr(Path
i,<+j
is
containedin
A)
:
Pr(Path
i,<+.i
is monocltrornatic)
x
(1-
))'
3(1
-
^)i
(1
+
2))r+
2(1-
))r
:
1-
i(l).
(1
+2))/+2(1
-)/
l'olcorn'erttience,setp:1-)(l).
CorrsiclertheseLofexteriorvurticesofsornegivencolour'.
irnrl
lct ,t
{
G
*
s)n bc the
sizeof
that set.
Provided
s
is srnall cnough
(s
:
1/:10u,ill
<Ict).'itr.,
<
d,<
1
By
Lemma 8,lr,ith probabilitv
1-
exp(-O(t/rD,
the
maxirnunr nunrbt:r'o1'extcrior
r.ertit:esirr
arry
r:onnectecl (:omponentof thc graph ([Ar],,1)
r'estrictecltri
thisrolcrrrr'-clnss
is
at
rnost
y3.
(R.ecallthat [N]
is
thc
veltex
set
of'K,, &
Pr.)
Corrrlrirringtlris
olrscn'ation
fclrall
three
colours, andnoting
u
:
Q('rt), rveobtain thc
folkru'ing: u.ith
prolrtrbilitv
1
cxp(
tl(tff
)).
the numbe-'r of external verticesin
:ury connecterl cronrlroricntof
(lIl.
A)
is
at
rrrost/n.
Let
s bethe number of
such components,and
'il7,...,'rls
l)c
thcil
rcspective sizers. Tlir:exprectcrl
sizc
of a
colottr-cltrss constnrcteclirr step (S\\r2) is
n/3,
and
ber:auscthcrc
iut'
rrranv (,onU)olrerlts
(at
least .,16)
rve trxpectthe
actunl
sizeof
each colour-ciassto
br: r'krse'to thc
r:xpect:rtion.
\\,'e quantif'1'this irrtuition bv
appcaling
to thc
Hoeflcling bciurrcl.Fix
acoklrr'.
sav 0.and
rlefinethr:
r'anclorn variablcsyi,...,)",
and
)"
bv\.'.
-
[
,r,.,
if
the
lt]r
cornporrcnt lcceivescolour0
irrstep
(S\V2);I
O,
otherrvise,er(li-Expil
>r)
<
".'of
'\2r
/./r,/I
\-,,1)
rl
o*r-I-?/2,, :l/2\J\
sirrcc
JS
D,,?It,t,1/i:,,']t2"
z=I t-I
Sirrrilar'lrouncls apply,
of
course.to
the other colours.
Choosirrgt:.Tt,l\[3
ri'itlr
lrrobabilitl'
1-
exp(-AGli
)),
the
sizeof
every colour
crlassirr
o'lies
t I r /i, ,1 r /i, \ |
((,i 'l\/3),,. (i
'lr/Sl
rr): lrut lhis cotuliliou
itttplieso'
€
Qt,r,r(.).
'fhis
ploves
the
first
pzrrt
of the result,
r:oncerning f?1,1,1(e):the
sec:ondfronr
t,hcfirst
bv Propositiorr
7anil tinre-r'eversibilitl'.
In
particlrl:rr,
it
follolvs1,lrat,11rsrv satisfies
tlte
d ctu'i,lr:d, ltu,l,o,n,rt: conclitiott:irncl
)': Ii=rli.
Therr
Expl'
:n13
arrd, b.v Lernma 9,for
anyI
>
0,It
is norl, ;rshort
stepto
the main theorern.
R.ecallthat
r(
befirre
the
f-step
clistribution
is
within variation
distance(rrra,xirnised or.cr
thc
choiceof
starting
state).)<
u,e srrc
that.
irr thc
lirrrg('pzrrt follou's
frorn
lhe
ftic:tPr(o:
oy Aot
: oz):
Pr(o
= ozAo' =
ot),fbl
all
t:onfigurations
o1anrl
o2,lr'hele
o
is sanrplecl{iorn
the statiorrary
distributiorr.
I
ll
I
3clerrotes
the
number rif stelrs Iof'
tlie
st:rtionarv
clistribriticxrTheorem
Ll
Let
E
be o,.fi,n,i,te alph,a,het of ,si,zr: o,t leo,,sttuto.
Th,r:rr: et;i,sts on ln,.firt,i,te:..fern'i,l:lo,f petrtrr,u,ta,ti,on, grou,1t,s
G
,su,ch, tha,tthe'miringl
time
oJ th,e Bu,rnsid,e pr-or:ess,i1u(G,E)
i,sr:.rporr,crr,t'i,a,l,'i,rt, th,r: rl,egree
rn
o.fG;
spu:i,.fit:all'11r(113):
Q(cxp(rnrl(I+t)))
fo,
a,rr,ut
>
0.Proo.f.
Bv Proposition 3.
it
is
erroughto exhibit
an irrfirrite
fartrilv of
grtrphsf
strclttlttrt
Ilsw(f ,,\)
has
exponcntial rnixing tirne.
rvliere
) : i;
2.
This faniily' of
graph-.u'ill
of'(:olusLr be (1t,17;
I
P1 :I
e
N)
wheren(l)
is as defincclin
lerrtrna6.
Thefamilv
ofpermrttatiott
groilps lrlorttised
b1,'thetheorem
u,ill thcn
be
(G3(f',fll
84) :l
e
N).Consicler
a
traiector'rv(ar
:l
€ N) of
,4{s11'(/'(,-,8Pr,))
starting in
the
sta,tionan'distri-lrrrtiorr.
\\'e
savthat
the trajectorv
escapesat
stcp
t if
(o1
e
01,1r(e)Aor+r
4Qt,t,'(t))
V(,o1€9a11(e) Ao1;1
f
{)^,t,r(e)).F
ol
cacht.
b-vProposition
10, theprobability
of escalre at tirneI
is bounclecl bv crl r(-!
2 (yfi
) )Frirtherrnorc,
by Proprisitiott
7thc
probatrilit.v of the
cvcntos
(
{}11,'(e) U J/a 11(e)is
aiscr bouncledbv
cxp(-0(t/",D
Tlrus therc
is:r
function
T : T(n,):
exp(f)(\,fi))
such
that, u'ith
probabilitl':rt
least
$,
therinitial
segrnentof the
trajectorl'
(o1: 0
<
f
<
7)
lics
eitlier cntirelv lr'ithitr
J/1,1,1(e)
or entilelv
within
Or,r,r(e).
Hencethere is an
irritial
state
s
e
Qr,tr(e)
sLrchthat
Pr(o7
#
Ar,r,r(r) l
"n
:
s)
(
,o!, anclsirnilarll'for
s
€
Oq,t,r(.e). Choose sttcrhiln
irriti;rl
state s
frrlrn
r,vhicheverof
Or,r,r(e)
or' 9a.1.1(s) hasthe
srrrzrllcrtotal
lvcigltt
irrthir
stirtittttttlv
rlistliitution.
Then
the variation
clistanceof the T-step distributiotr frorn the
st,a,tiotrarvclistrilrutiorr
is at least
j -
r'
o(")
- #
>
{.
Finallv
note
that
nt,:
O(.'n.'21): O(rt')logri).
(It
is
straiglrtfbrr,varclto
ser:frorn Lemtna 6
that
l: O(logn).)
tl
Although thc
clefinition
ofr
contains anexistential quantificatiott
overittitial
states,it
rvill
lrr:
sec.nthat
Theorern
11is
not verv
sensitiveto
the
initial
state:
r(l;
tranbe
repla,r:t:cllr1'
rr(|),
lvhcre
s
rarrgcsover alrnost every
state
in
Ot,r,t(€)
ol
O11i(--),
nt
itl)l)I()l)Iiirt('
("ahtrcist
cx)r\,"
being
interpletcd lvith
respcct
to thc statiorraly
clistribution).
6
Open
problems
In
this
paper,
lr,c have shor,vnthat
the
Burnside
processis
not r:rpidly rnixing irt
gr:tteral.It
lcrnains an open
cluestion r,vhethetrthere is
sone ofher
polynomial-tirrre
ntcthocl u,hitrh;rchieves
the
sameclistribution as
the
Burnside
pl'oc;ess,eithcr on
pernrutzLtiotts (a,s inLerrrrrra
1)
or
on
rvords (asin
Lemrna2).
Since(B1)
is
easyto
implerncnt
irt
polvtiotttial-tirnc.
zrpoll'nonrial-time
sarnplingalgorithm for
the stationat'y
distribution
r
of'Lt:tnnta
1u'oulrl
yield
apoll'nomial-time
samplel
for
the stationary distributio:n
r'
of
Letttttta2
(i
,'
.thc urri{il'rn
distribution
onorbits). If
there is apolynomial-tirne
strmplingalgorithnr
for tht:distribrrtiorrn'tlrisrn'iIIinrplr'[8]thattlrereisaJu'll71po|'un'om'za,lr'u,n,d,rlrn,,i's
,sc:lr,r:'rrt,e
for the
singlc-varial.irecycle
in,d,et; poh1n,onr,i,u,lfor
everv integer
k
(sccl2]).
Sucha
lcsult
noulcl be
:r
striking contrast
to
thc
result of the authors
(see[a])
r,vhich sltorvsthat,
urrlessNP
-
R,P. rro such
approximation algorithm
exists
for
attv
fixccl
r':rtiolral rrorr-interiel A;.References
l1l
B
Bolr,<teAs,
G.
GRTIIMETT zrndS.
.JaNsoN,Thc
lanclorn-clustel
nroclelon
thr.c'orrr1;lctc
graph,
Proba,bi,lity Th,eory a'n,d, R.el,ated Fi,elds104 (1996).283
317.[2]
N
G. oB
BRUIJN, P6lvzr'stheorv of counting,
in
Ayt'pl'ir:d, Corrtbilr,utoriul Mutltem,o,til:,s(tr
F
Beckerrb:rch,ed.), John
Wilel'and
Sons, 1964. 1,14 184.[3]
R
Cl. EowaRos
ancl
A.
D.
SoKAL,
Generalizations
of the
Foltuirr-I(astek'r.rr-Su,crrclscn-Wang
rcprcscntatiorr
and
N4onteC:rrlo
algorithm.
Phrysira,l R,e:'u'i,eru,
38(1988).
2009
',20r2.[rl]
Lcslie
Ann GolnBtrRG, Autornating
P6lya
theor'1':thc
cornputatiorral cornplexih'
o1'the
r;vcle inclexpolynoniial,
Inforrrtati,on
and, Corn'putation, LOic(i993).268
288.[ir] \'ir.ek
Gono
zrrrd\,fark
.IeRRUtt,
The
Su'enclsen-\\'ang process cloesnot
alu,a'n'srlix
rtrpiclly, Proceed,i,ngs oJ the 29th
ACM
Syrnpos'iurnon
Theoryof
Corn'putafftin (STOC).AC\,{
Prcss.
1997,674
681. (Theorem
numbr:rscitccl
hr:rcarc
from thr:
proccerlirrgsversiorr,
not frorn thc
Eclinburgh
Univcrsitr'-tochnical
rcport
-n'elsion (trCS-LFCS-96-3.19. 1996).)[6]
F
,IAncoR,
D. L.
VrrtrtcAN,
and
D.
,I.A.
Wplsu,
On
thc
cronrputationzrlr:orlplex-itr. of the
Jones :LnclTirtte
polvnomials,
Ma,tLt,r:'rn,o,ti,ut,l Pror:eerl'trr,gsof tltr:
Currt,ltri,tl,qcPlr,'i,lo.so'ph,ir:0,1,
Srrirt'y
108
(1990),35
53.f7]
N,'lark .IoRRul,t,Unifbrrn
sarnpling moclulo agroup
of symrnetlies using N,larkov cliaiusirnulation.
In
"ExparrrlirrgGraphs"
(Joel Friedman, ecl.),DIMACS
Seri,es i,n, Di,sr:.rr;tt: Ma,th,ern,ati,r:.s a,rr,d, Tlteo'reticol, Computer Science10. Amr:rican
N,,I:rthenratical Sor:ietr..1993.
37
'17.[8] Nlark
.JERRUl,,t,Conrputational Prilya
t]reory.
In
"Sun'evs
in
Combina,torit:si995."
Lort,rl,rtrt, Ma,th,e,rn,a,ttcaL Soci,etgl Lr:r:ture
l{ote
Serte.,s218,
Carn}rridgcUnir.ersitr,
Prcss.199;.
103
I l819]
\{ark
.JBnRutt
and Alistzrir SrNclnrn..
T}re \'{:rrkov
ch:rirr N4onteCarlo rnethorl:
rirrirpprozrclr
ici
ap1;r'oxirnatccottnting
andintegration.It
Apprctrtrno,tzonAlgoritlrrns
.for'NP-h,urd, Probl,em,s
(Dorit
Hochbaurn,ed.), PWS,
1996,482
520.110] trrrgenc N,l.
LuNs.
Isomolphisrn
of
graphsof
boundecl v:rlencecan be
testeclirr
polr'-nonriirl
tlrne.
,Joulvrz,lof
Com,pu,ter and Stlstern Scrences25 (1982).42
65.[11]
Colirr
McDtanntlD,
On
the
nrethod
of
bounded
clifferelnt,t,s,Londort
Mo,th,t:rrt,u,t'i,url,Sor:'i,r:t'u Lectu,r'e Note: Seri,es
L4L,
Canrbriclge Univelsit-v Press. 1989. 1.18 188.[12]
PrrrrlMRRrrN. Potts
Modr:ls u,n,tl, Relu,terl Problem,sin
Sta,tistzc:al Mr:r:h,olt,/,r:s.\\iorkl
Sr:ientific, Sirrgaporc, 1991.
10
[13]
P.
N,I. NnuiraaNN.A
lernmathat
is
not
Burns\cle's, Mo,th,r:.rrr.u,tr,co,l Sc'i,en,ti,st4
(1979),133
1.11"f1a]
\cil
O'CoNNBLT-, Some largedeviation
resultslbr
sparserandom
grziphs, Prolxtb'il'it't1Tlr,rnr"y and, Rel,a,ted Fi,el,d,s
110 (1998),277
285.[15]
LeonarclSorcupR,
personal comrnunication.[16]
N.C. Won.naalo,
Generating
ranclornunlabelled graphs,
SIAM
,lou,rna,l oJConrprt,t-in,q 1.6 (1987)