JOURNALOFCLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, Mar.1978,p. 273-278 Vol 0095-1137/78/0007-0273$02.00/0
Copyright©1978 AmericanSociety for Microbiology Printed
Impedimetric
Screening
for
Bacteriuria
P.CADY,* S. W. DUFOUR, P. LAWLESS, B.NUNKE, ANDS.J. KRAEGER
Bactomatic, Inc., Palo Alto,California94303
Receivedforpublication16May1977
A rapid, automated instrumental procedure for distinguishing urine cultures
containing greater than 105organisms per ml is described. The method is based
upon the measurement ofchanges in impedance that takeplaceasmicroorganisms
alter the chemical composition of the mnedium. The time required to detect
impedancechangeis
inversely
relatedtothe initial concentration ofmicroorga-nisms in thesample.By defininganimpedance-positivecultureas onethatgives
detectable impedance change within 2.6 h,95.8% of 1,133 urine cultures tested werecorrectlyclassifiedascontainingmorethanorfewer than105 organismsper ml. Selection ofa longer detection time decreases false
negative
results atthecost of increased false positive results. Impedance screening is compared with
screening data reported in the literatureusing adenosine-5'-triphosphate
detec-tion, microcalorimetry, electrochemical measurements, andoptical microscopy.
1. 7,No. 3 {in U.S.A.
A screeningtest forbacteriuria, ifrapid,
ac-curate, and inexpensive, could have many
ad-vantages. Itwouldspeed apreliminaryreport to
the clinicianwhocould prescribetreatment on
the basisofpositive
laboratory
evidence of in-fection.Itwould eliminatetheunrewarding plat-ing andreadingofnegative cultures thatin mostlaboratoriescomprisethelarge majorityofurine
cultures. Finally, it wouldencourage screening ofasymptomatic populations thatare not
pres-ently screened foreconomic reasons.
A number of rapid methods have been de-scribed. These includemeasurementof bacterial adenosine-5'-triphosphate by luciferase (1,4, 11), production ofradioactivecarbondioxideby
me-tabolism of labeled substrates (J. P. Kilbourn and J. L. Bramhall, Abstr. Annu. Meet. Am.
Soc. Microbiol. 1974, M278, p. 112),
measure-mentof thepotential generated bygrowing
mi-croorganisms using a platinum and a calomel
electrode(7),measurementofheatgenerated by
metabolizing microorganisms using a
microca-lorimeter (2;K. A. Bettelheim, S.M.O'Farrell,
S.Al-Salihi,E. J.Shaw, andA.E.Beezer,Abstr.
2nd Int.Symp. Rapid MethodsAuto.Microbiol.
1976, p.8),measurement of theimpedance ofa
suspensionof organismsfiltered from urine and
eluted into water(12), and measurement of
par-ticle size and distribution by
electronic-pulse
height analysis (L. S. Gall and W. A. Curby,
Abstr. Annu. Meet. Am. Soc. Microbiol. 1976,
C88,p. 40). Inaddition, anumber of
investiga-torshave usedmicroscopicexamination of urine
as ascreening procedure(8-10).
Thispaper reports on the use in 1,133clinical
urine cultures of an
impedance-measuring
in-strument to detect samples containing more
than105microorganismsperml,aconcentration
of microorganisms commonly associated with
the presence ofurinarytractinfection.Itshould
be pointedoutthat Kass (6) showed that over
105 of one single type ofmicroorganism per ml
was indicative of a urinary tract infection,
whereasthe methoddescribedherescreensfor
over105total organismsperml. It isoccasionally
the case that a urineculture will contain over
105organismsbutless than105of anysingletype
perml.
The pnnciple upon which impedance
moni-toring is based (3) can be briefly summarized
here. As microorganisms grow andmetabolize,
the chemicalcomposition of thesupporting
me-dium is alteredas nutrientsare consumedand
metabolic end products are produced.
Associ-ated with thischange inchemical composition
is a corresponding change in the resistance to
the flow of an alternating current (i.e., the
impedance)when apairofelectrodesare placed in the medium. When a small concentration of
microorganismsispresent, the changein
imped-anceis notdetectable.However,iftheorganisms
areallowedto
replicate,
they will,intime, reach numbers sufficienttocause adetectableimped-ance change. This concentration of
microorga-nismsisdesignatedthethresholdconcentration.
The threshold concentration depends, in part,
onhowdetectable
impedance
changeisdefined.When detection is defined asthefirst noticeable
change in impedance ratio, the corresponding
threshold concentration is about 105organisms
per ml. When detection is defined as 0.8% change in impedance ratio, a larger and more clearly
273
on February 7, 2020 by guest
http://jcm.asm.org/
274 CADY ET AL.
obvious change, the corresponding threshold
concentrations for most organisms are in the
range of10'to107organismsperml.
The timerequiredtoreach thethreshold
con-centrationiscalled thedetectiontime.Itisclear
that the smaller the initial concentration, the
longerthetimerequiredtoreachthreshold. The
detection time is, thus, a function oftheinitial
concentration; i.e., as theinitial concentration is
reduced, the detection time increases. Detection
timeisalsoafunction of the generationtimeof
the population of microorganisms being
mea-sured and is prolonged when organisms are
growing with slow generation times and
shortened with more rapid growth. If a
popula-tionof organisms has similar generation times,
the detection time can beused to estimate initial
concentrations. The application of thisprinciple
toestimating theinitialconcentrations of
micro-organismsin clinicalurine samples,especially in
establishing whether a sample contains more
than or less than 105 organisms per ml, is the subject of this paper.
A preliminary report based on part of this
data has already been presented (B. Nunke, S.
W. Dufour, and S. J. Kraeger, Abstr. Annu.
Meet. Amer. Soc. Microbiol. 1975, C25, p. 31).
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Instrumentation. The impedance-measuring in-strumentused in allexperiments was a BACTOME-TER 32 microbial monitoring system (Bactomatic, Inc.,PaloAlto, Calif.), which has been described else-where (5).
Electrodes. All sample chambers used in these
experiments were in clusters of 16, comprised of 8
samplechambers and8referencechambers, knownas
printed-circuit modules (Fig. 1) and have been de-scribed elsewhere (5). In thisstudy,both gold-plated
and stainless-steel electrodes were used. After use,
modulesweredecontaminated withAmphyl (Sterling Drug), rinsedthoroughly,and soakedovernightin 7X
FIG. 1. Printed-circuit board module (cluster of impedance chambers).
detergent (Linbro). Before sterilization, the module was extensively rinsed (1 h minimum) with tap and
distilledwater. Ourexperience showed that this
pro-cedurewas required notonly toreduce any residual
phenolic compounds to nontoxic levels, but also to assure moreuniform electrode response.
Impedance measurements. Ethylene
oxide-ster-ilizedmoduleswereasepticallyfilled withmedium, 1.0 ml in all reference chambers and0.5ml inall sample
chambers. All chambers were capped, and the
elec-trodes were allowed to equilibrate atroom tempera-turefor at least 1 h before obtaining urine samples. Modulesweregenerally preparedtheprevious day.
Afterequilibration,duplicate samplesof fresh urine (0.5 ml) were pipetted into sample wells. When all
sample wells werefilled, they wererecappedandthe
module wasthen inserted into the incubator portion
of the BACTOMETER32 microbial monitoring sys-tem, which had been preheated to 35°C. A 40-mV
sinusoidalsignal of2,000 Hzwas then passed across both reference and sample wells in series, and the
impedance changewasthenautomaticallyand
contin-uously recorded by the instrument's strip chart re-corder.
Impedimetric detection time.Todistinguishthe onsetofimpedance changecausedbymicrobialgrowth
from nonmicrobial changes, such asdrift, noise, and temperature fluctuation, a detection standard was
used. An accelerating change of 0.8% in impedance had to take place before an impedance change was
ascribed tomicrobialactivity.The timeatwhich the
accelerating-impedance changereached 0.8%was
des-ignatedthedetectiontime.Sometimes,especiallywith large concentrations of microorganisms, there was a strong, immediate, nonaccelerating change in
imped-ance. If this change exceeded 10% in 1 h, it was
designatedasdetection.
Cultures. All clinical urine specimens were
ran-domlyselected and obtained from Kaiser Foundation
Hospital (Santa Clara, Calif.) and transportedtoour laboratory. Three plates from eachsamplewere
pre-pared:two dilutionswere platedontoblood agar and one dilution was plated on Levine eosin-methylene
blue agar. All plates were prepared by using a
cali-brated-loop technique. Organisms from positive cul-tures wereidentifiedby conventional microbiological procedures.
Media. All media were made from commercially prepared dehydrated bases obtained from Baltimore
Biological Laboratory (Cockeysville, Md.) according
to manufacturer's directions. These included brain heartinfusion(BHI),BHIwith 0.05%agar,Trypticase
soy broth, Columbia broth, and thioglycolate broth. Othermedia,blood culture medium withand with-out0.05% agar contained BHI base(BBL),0.5%yeast extract, 0.025%sodium polyanetholsulfonate, 0.0001% vitamin K (dissolved in 95% ethanol), and 0.005% hemin.
RESULTS
AND
DISCUSSIONThe medium and the sample inoculum size
were determined by preliminary studies
per-formed withurine samplesknowntohavehigh
concentrations of organisms. Six media, BHI,
J. CLIN. MICROBIOI,.
on February 7, 2020 by guest
http://jcm.asm.org/
IMPEDIMETRIC SCREENING FOR BACTERIURIA
blood culture medium without agar, blood
cul-ture medium with agar,Trypticasesoy broth,
Columbia broth, and thioglycolate broth, were
compared with respect to their promotion of
rapid growth, impedance drift,and response size.
After62urinesampleswereanalyzed,BHIwas
chosen, not because it wasdemonstrated to be
clearly superior, but because the other media
werenobetter with respecttothe above
param-eters.
Various urine-BHI ratios were investigated,
ranging from 1% urine and 99% BHI to 100%
urine. Thepredominantly urine mixtures have
theadvantage ofmaintainingahigh
concentra-tion ofmicroorganisms and, hence, of shortening
detection times.Theyhave thedisadvantage of
introducing a large variable, the urine itself,
which can differ considerably from patient to
patient with respect to pH and ionic content.
Conversely, a small inoculum such as 10
p1
ofurine minimizes thevariabilityof the urine and
dilutes inhibitory substances, but it markedly
cutsdown the initial concentration oforganisms
in theimpedance chamber, thusprolonging
de-tection times. (Detection times with 1% urine
and 99% BHIweretypically3hlater than those
with 100% urine.) A workable compromise was
found with0.5ml of urine and0.5mlof medium.
Detection times for 1,133 urine specimens
S10'
N,
U-U 10'
z
82o
I-U z
0 2
U
z.
1011ooL
0
* * .I
*;s
'
._-plotted againstinitialconcentration are shown
inFig. 2.Each urine specimen isrepresented by
asingle point on the graph, the coordinates of
whichdefine the detection time in hours and the
initial concentration in colony-forming units.
Detection times greater than 12h areshown at
the extreme right hand of the graph along a
common vertical line. The numbers next to
larger black circles indicate the number of
sam-ples having the samedetection time and initial
concentration displayed together as one large
datapoint.
The horizontal line at 105
organisms
per mlindicates the level chosentodivide
positive
andnegative urine cultures.
Thus,
allpoints
abovethe linerepresentcultures definedas
positive by
platecount,and allpoints below the line
repre-sentculturesdefinedas
negative. By
thiscrite-rion, 188sampleswere
positive
and945samples
werenegative.
We maychooseatimecalledthecutofftime
thatwill dividetheculturesintothosedetected beforethecutoff(and henceare
impedance
pos-itive) and those detected after the cutoff time (and are thus impedance
negative).
One such cutofftimeisrepresented by
thevertical lineat2.6 h. All points now fall into four
quadrants.
Thepoints in theupper-leftquadrantrepresent
cultures positive both
by
plate
count andby
,..L.. .5...
* .**A*.
*.!***^: ..*,£.-:.
It
t..
I *9
456
*81 .22
I_I_I_I__ .I I n78
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 OVER12
__ _-HOURS
DETECTION TIME (HOURS)
FIG. 2. Detection times of 1,133 randomly selected urinesamples plotted against the initial concentration incolony-formingunits permilliliter (by plate count). The horizontal line dividesallcultures into those with greater orfewerthan 10 organisms perml. The verticalline divides all cultures into impedancepositive
(detection time,:2.6h)orimpedancenegative (detection time, >2.6 h). Some points are larger than the others and have a number next to them. The number represents the number of data pointsoccupying the same
positiononthegraph.Allsampleswith detection timesgreater than 12 h are shown at the extreme right-hand
sideofthegraph.
is, mi. .
- t.
I .
VOL. 7,1978 275
107
I
I~~~~~~~~~~
on February 7, 2020 by guest
http://jcm.asm.org/
276 CADY ET AL.
impedance.Conversely, the points in the
lower-right quadrant represent cultures negative by
both criteria.Culturesdesignated as positive by
impedancebutnegative by platecount are rep-resented by points in the lower-left quadrant
and are false positive results. Cultures positive
by plate count but negative by impedance are
false negative results and are represented by
points intheupper-rightquadrant.
Bychangingthe cutoff time, the numbers of
false positive and false negative results can be
altered. Short cutoff times minimize false
posi-tive but increase false negative results. Long
cutoff times minimize falsenegativebut increase
falsepositiveresults.
Maximum agreement between the two
meth-ods isachievedwithacutoff time of2.6h. With
thiscriterion, 95.8% of allsamplesarecorrectly classified, with22 false positive samplesand 26
falsenegative samples.Thus, 1.9% of allsamples
are false positive and 2.3% of all samples are
false negative. These numbersare summarized
in Table 1, where the upper-left box contains
the number ofsamples found positive by both
systems; upper right, those positive by plate
count only; lowerleft, those positive by
imped-ance only; and lower right, those negative by
both systems. Also summarized in Table 1 are
the percentages of falsenegativeandfalse
posi-tivesamples (aspercentagesof thetotal number ofcultures) and positive samples missed (as a
percentage of thenumber of cultures found
pos-itivebyplate count).
Maximum agreement may not be the most
desirable criterion for selecting a cutoff time.
Current practicein many clinics is to treat all
patientsonthebasis ofhistory,symptoms, and a urinalysis, using a culture only to verify the
diagnosis. Arapidscreen would enable the
cli-nician to withhold treatment until he had
spe-cificlaboratory confirmation of bacteriuria.
In-creasing the cutoff time, thereby minimizing
false negative atthe expense ofincreasing false
positive results, will assurethat fewer cases of
bacteriuriaaremissed. The additional false
pos-TABLE 1. Numberofpositiveandnegativesamples
obtainedbyculture andbyimpedance usinga2.6-h
cutoff
Impedance" (cutoff time) Culture(organisms/ml)
+(c2.(6h) -(>2.6h)
+ (-10") 162 26
- (<10'') 22 923
J. CLIN. MICROBIOL.
itive samples so engendered would mean that
morepatientswould receive unnecessary
treat-ment. A greater number of positive samples
would alsomean morework for the
microbiolo-gist, assuming that all cultures positive by the
screenwould need furtherworkup.
Toreduce false negative results, and thereby
reduce the percentage of positive cultures
missed, onecanincrease the cutofftime; this has
the effect ofincreasingfalsepositivesamples as
well. Using 3.5 h as the cutoff time, to reduce
the falsenegativeresults and the percentage of
positive cultures missed, gives agreement of
93.3% with 14false negative and 55 false positive
samples. Thus, the percentage of all samples
that are false negative falls from 2.3 and 1.2%.
The false positive cultures rise from 1.9 to
4.9%, and the percentage of positive samples
missed drops from 13.8 to7.5% (Table 2).
Anotherway to view these percentages is in
terms of the percentage ofsamples
impedimet-rically classified positive or negative for which
the plate countyielded the sameclassification.
The 2.6-h cutoffyields 184 impedance-positive
cultures, with 162,or88%, also positive by plate
count, and 949 impedance-negative cultures,
with 923,or97.3%, also negative by plate count.
Increasing the cutoff timeto 3.5hincreases the
latter percentage to 98.5% at the expense of
decreasingthe formerto76%.
There are several likelyreasons for the false
negativeresults that occurred with the
imped-ancemethod. One sourceoffalse negative data
is urine samples that contain antimicrobial
agents. In only a few cases was information
availablethat urinesamplescamefrompatients activelybeingtreated with antibiotics. In some
of these specimens, we noted that the
impedi-metric assessment was negative, whereas the
plate count was positive. This mayresult from
the fact that agreaterdilution ofantimicrobial
agents takes place on the surface of a culture
platethan ispossibleinanimpedancechamber. Thesmallvolume ofacalibratedloopisspread
overthe entire surface of theplate,and
presum-TABLE2. Numberofpositiveandnegativesamples
obtainedbyculture andbyimpedance usinga3.5-h
cutoff
Impedance" (cutoff time) Culture(organisms/ml)
+(c3.5h) -(>3.5h)
+ (-10") 174 14
(<
10')
55 890aNumber of false positive samples, 55/1,133 (4.9%);falsenegative samples,14/1,133(1.2%);positive samplesmissed,14/188(7.4%);agreement,1,064/1,133
(93.9%).
aNumber of false positive samples, 22/1,133
(1.9%); falsenegativesamples,26/1,133(2.3%);positive
samples missed, 26/188 (13.8%); agreement, 1,085/ 1,133(95.8%).
on February 7, 2020 by guest
http://jcm.asm.org/
VOL. 7, 1978
ably the volume into which the anti
diffuse is, by
contrast, verylarge. Alt4
antibiotics may be bound to agar in
countprocedure,whereas this is not ]
the liquid medium of the impedance Some false negative cultures ma
causedby
slower-growing
organismst notreach threshold as rapidly as,fo: Escherichia coli. Itshould be noted that many organisms with generat longer than E. coli, such as staphyloc( tococci, lactobacilli,yeast, etc., weredim,pedance positives in thisstudy-p
duetoveryhigh initial concentration the organisms encountered inthe cu]
ignated positiveby platecountappeal 3.
One should examine thedata from
of view of
work
saved. If one reliesscreen and does nofurther work wit
thatarescreenedasnegative,
conside]
issaved. Thissavings ismostmarked
TABLF, 3. Distributionof organisms in
samples positive by culture(>lt0'
Organism No. of
cultures
Escherichia coli.107
Proteus mirabilis.. 13
Staphylococcus aureus 12
Klebsiella pneumoniae ... 9
Enterococcus 7
Pseudomonasaeruginosa .... 5
Enterobacter sp. 3
Streptococcus sp. 2
Lactobacilli and diphtheroids 2
Serratiamarcescens 1
Candida sp. ... ... 1
Unidentified gram-negative
rods .... 18
Unidentifiedgram-positive
cocci 4
Mixedorganisms ... 4
IMPEDIMETRIC SCREENING FOR BACTERIURIA 277
ibiotic can percentageof positive samples isgenerallysmall,
ernatively, asmight be expected in anoutpatient clinic. If
Lthe plate allimpedance negativesampleswerediscarded
possible in andonly impedance positive cultureswere
quan-chamber. titatively cultured,acutofftimeof 3.5 hwould
Ly also be yield79.8% reduction in work. The work saved
thatwould isevengreaterwiththe shortercutofftime,i.e.,
r example, 83.8%.
L,
however, In Table4theimpedancescreeniscomparedtion times with othertechniques. The dataare all castinto
Dcci,strep- thesameformasTables 1and2, andaretaken
letectedas from the cited references. The results of each
Iresumably techniquearecompared with platecountresults
s.A list of by using thesamecriterionforapositive culture
Itures des- of105organismsorgreaterperml. All techniques
rsinTable are rapid, ranging in time from afew minutes
for microscopy to 4 h for the electrochemical.
kthepoint Also, in general, the agreement obtained was
upon the highfor allmethods(Table 5). Microcalorimetry
;h cultures had the lowest agreementdue tothelarge
num-rable labor ber of false positive results; however, the very
Iwhenthe low percentage ofpositive samples missed is a
very strong feature of thismethod. Impedance
188urine hasthe bestoverallagreement(seeeither Table
/ml) 1or2) butdoesnothaveaslowapercentageof
% positive cultures missed as were seen with
mi-crocalorimetry or microscopy. The luciferase
56.9 method missed over ¼4 ofthe samples positive
6.9 by plate count, which is a severelimitation to
6.4 this procedure. More confidence canbeplaced
4.8 inresults fromthose studies having the largest
3.7 sample sizes. Thus, it is possible that further
2.7 studiesmayleadtoslightly different conclusions
1.6 with those methods where the sample size is
1.1 verysmall.
0.5 The use of
microscopy,
although
reasonably
0.5 accurateandby
far themostrapid,
isnotwide-spread.Thismaybe due tothe burden itplaces
9.6 on the staff performing the work, which is
ex-acting and tedious. Adenosine-5'-triphosphate
2.1 assays require chemical manipulation of the
2.1 sample,which isabarrier formanylaboratories
TABLE4. Comparisonof the number ofpositiveandnegativesamples obtained by culture and various screening procedures
Screening procedure
Culture Electrochemical" Microcalorimetry^ Adenosine-5'-triphos-phate" Microscopy"
+ -+ -+ _+_
+ 37 3 146 4 46 17 712 31
- 2 26 44 105 20 265 188 1633
aDatataken fromFig. 1of reference7. "See reference2.
'*Seereference 1.
"See reference 8.Onlythe results fromdefiningapositiveresult by culture as samples having>O0'organisms perml andapositiveresultby microscopyasmultiplecellsareshown.
on February 7, 2020 by guest
http://jcm.asm.org/
TABLE5. Agreementof variousscreening procedures
Screening ed No. of sam- False positive sam- False negative Positive samples Agreement
ples ples(%) samples (%) missed(%)
Electrochemical" 68 2/68(2.9) 3/68 (4.4) 3/40(7.5) 63/68 (92.6)
Microcalorimetryb 299 44/299(14.7) 4/299 (1.3) 4/150(2.7) 251/299 (84.0) Adenosine-5'-tri- 348 20/348(5.7) 17/348 (4.9) 17/63 (27.0) 311/348 (89.4)
phosphate
lucif-erase"
Microscopy" 2,564 188/2,564(7.3) 31/2,564 (1.2) 31/743(4.2) 2,345/2,564(91.5)
aDatataken fromFig.1ofreference7.
bSee reference2.
cSeereference 1.
dSee reference8.
in terms of labor cost, and, in addition, the reagentsareexpensive. The majordifficulty with
microcalorimetry is thatmostmicrocalorimeters
are single-channel instruments.
Multiple-chan-nel instruments have been made, but they are
costly and not readily available. The
electro-chemical method iseasytouseandshowsgreat
promise, but this method also appears to be
difficulttoextend(at low cost)tomonitoring of
large sample numbers. Thus, of the methods
compared above, the impedance approach
ap-pears to offer advantages in ease of use and
abilitytohandlelargenumbers ofsampleswhile
retaining a high level of agreement with the
plate counttechnique.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We thankEdithSteward and themedical technologistsof Kaiser Foundation Hospital, Santa Clara, Calif., for their cheerfulcooperationandassistance inobtaining clinical
spec-imens. Thepatienttechnical assistance ofPatriciaCastillo, Alice D.Cavette,VivianGodinez,and FatimaZaman, and the dedicated secretarial skills of LuYutzy,aregratefully acknowl-edged.
LITERATURE CITED
1. Alexander, D.N.,G. M.Ederer, and J. M. Matsen. 1976. Evaluation ofanadenosine5'-triphosphateassay asascreeningmethodtodetectsignificantbacteriuria. J.Clin.Microbiol.3:42-46.
2. Beezer,A.E.,K. A.Bettelheim,R. D.Newell,and J. Stevens. 1974. The diagnosisof bacteriuria byflow
microcalorimetry, a preliminary investigation. Sci. Tools 21:13-15.
3. Cady,P. 1975.Rapid automated bacterial identification byimpedance measurement, p. 73-99. In C. G. Heden andT.Illeni(ed.), New approaches to the identification ofmicroorganisms. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York. 4. Chappelle,E.W.,andG. W. Picciolo.1971.Bacterial adenosinetriphosphate (ATP)as ameasureofurinary tract infection. NASA publication TSP1-10051, Na-tional Aeronautics andSpace Administration, Green-belt, Md.
5.Hadley, W. K., and G. Senyk.1975.Early detection of microbial metabolism and growth by measurement of electricalimpedance, p.12-21.In D.Schlessinger (ed.), Microbiology-1975. American Societyfor Microbiol-ogy,Washington, D. C.
6.Kass, E. H. 1957.Bacteriuria and thediagnosis of infec-tions of the urinary tract. Arch. Intern. Med. 100:709-714.
7.Lamb,V.A.,H. P.Dalton, and J. R. Wilkins.1976. Electrochemical method for theearly detection of uri-narytractinfections.Am. J.Clin. Pathol.66:91-95. 8.Lewis, J. F., and J. Alexander. 1976.Microscopy of
stained urinesmears todetermine the need for quanti-tativeculture. J.Clin. Microbiol.4:372-374.
9. Robins,D.G.,R. H.White,K.B.Rogers, and M. S. Osman.1975.Urinemicroscopyas anaidin the detec-tion of bacteriuria.Lanceti:476-478.
10. Rosenthal,S.1976.Microscopic screeningforbacteriuria. N.Y.StateJ.Med.76:209-211.
11.Thore, A.,S.Ansehn,A.Lundin,andS.Bergman. 1975. Detection of bacteriuria byluciferase assay of adenosinetriphosphate.J.Clin. Microbiol.1:1-8. 12. Wheeler,T.G.,and M. C. Goldschmidt. 1975.
Deter-mination ofbacterial cell concentrations by electrical measurements.J.Clin. Microbiol.1:25-29.