• No results found

The Exchange 2010 Ecosystem

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "The Exchange 2010 Ecosystem"

Copied!
17
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

The Exchange 2010 Ecosystem

Joe Hoegler Practice Leader, Kraft Kennedy Microsoft Certified Master | Exchange 2010

TECH9

S e s s i o n G o a l s

• Discuss the capabilities and limitation of native

features

• Identify when third party solutions are

appropriatepp p

• Focus on high availability, disaster recovery,

backup, archiving and compliance, mobility, anti-virus/anti-spam, unified messaging

• Discuss considerations for integrating with

SharePoint 2010, Office 2010 and Lync 2010

Exchange 2010 Architecture

Enterprise Network Enterprise Network External SMTP servers Edge Transport Routing and AV/AS

Phone system (PBX or VOIP)

Hub Transport Routing and policy

Mailbox Unified Messaging

Client Access Client connectivity Web services Web browser Mobile phone Mailbox Storage of mailbox items g g Voice mail and

(2)

HIGH AVAILABILITY & DISASTER

RECOVERY

High Availability & Disaster Recovery

• Unified in Exchange 2010 via the Database

Availability Group

• Native or third party replication supported

f

• Recovery Time Objective of 15 minutes or less

is possible

• Recovery Point Objective of 1 MB or less is

possible

Database Availability Group

Mailbox  Server DB1 DB3 DB2 Recover quickly

from disk and

d b f il Mailbox  Server DB1 DB2 DB3 Mailbox  Server DB1 DB2 DB3 Replicate databases to remote datacenter

San Jose New York

• Evolution of Continuous Replication technology • Easier than traditional clustering to deploy and manage • Allows each database to have 16 replicated copies

• Provides full redundancy of Exchange roles on as few as two servers • HA and DR capabilities combined into one platform

(3)

Key Considerations

• Increased storage capacity requirements

–Dramatically reduced storage performance requirements (~90% IOPS reduction from Exchange 2003)g )

• Load balancing appliances strongly

recommended

–WNLB or round robin DNS not recommended

• Continuous Replication Block Mode

Third Party Alternatives

• Leverage SAN replication through DAG third

party replication API

• SAN-based replication

• Host-based replication

Recommendations

• Native DAG features and replication provide a

complete solution that can be managed wholly by messaging team

• Marginal feat re enhancements or replication

• Marginal feature enhancements or replication

(4)

BACKUP

Exchange Native Protection

“Backup-less” Exchange

Database Availability Group Personal Archive

Extended/Protected Dumpster Retention

Site/server/disk failure Archiving/compliance Recover deleted items

7-14 day lag copy

X

X

Database Availability Group Mailbox Mailbox Server 1 Server 1 Server 2Server 2Mailbox Mailbox

Mailbox Mailbox Server 3 Server 3 DB1 DB2 DB3 DB1 DB2 DB3 DB1 DB2 DB3

Key Considerations

• Requires at least 3 database copies across

more than 1 site

• Point-in-time recoveries require lagged

database copies database copies

• Leverages native corruption detection

mechanisms

• Understand Deleted Item Retention and Single

(5)

Third Party Alternatives

• Virtual Deployments – agent, SAN snapshot,

image-based backup

• Physical Deployments – agent, SAN snapshot

• If using SAN snapshots, *always* ensure that

snapshots are replicated outside of the enclosure/site

Recommendations

• Increase Deleted Item Retention period to

match normal backup retention to help with item-level recovery

–Leverage Single Item Recovery if appropriate –Leverage Single Item Recovery if appropriate

• Consider risk/reward of Exchange Native

Protection vs. cost of third party backup solution

(6)

Archiving & Compliance Suite

• Personal Archive • Multi-Mailbox Search • Legal Holds –Litigation Hold –Retention Hold

• Single Item Recovery

Personal Archive

A secondary mailbox that is configured by the administrator Appears alongside a user’s primary mailbox in Outlook or Outlook Web App.

PST data can be dragged and dropped to the Personal Archive E-mail in primary mailbox can be moved automatically using Retention Policies

Archive quota can be set separately from primary mailbox

Personal Personal Archive Archive

Multi-Mailbox Search

Delegate Access to Specialists Delegate Access to Specialists

Rich Search Criteria and Targeting Options Rich Search Criteria and Targeting Options

(7)

Legal Holds

User is told how to comply (no action needed for e-mail)

URL links to additional info

Key Considerations

• Personal Archive limitations

–No stubbing, no offline access, separate tree –Requires Outlook 2010 Professional or Professional

Plus or OWA 2010 Plus or OWA 2010

–Requires Exchange 2010 Enterprise CAL –Capabilities of Retention Policies

• Archive API exists for third party integration

Third Party Alternatives

• Traditional e-mail archiving solutions

–Autonomy ZANTAZ EAS –Symantec Enterprise Vault

H d/ l d hi i l i

(8)

Recommendations

• Determine feature requirements vs. feature

desires

• Understand the feature gaps between native

and third part archi ing and third party archiving

• Evaluate if native archiving meets all feature

requirements • Pilot, pilot, pilot

MOBILITY

Trends in Mobility

• Most firms support multiple mobility platforms

across a broad range of device types

• BlackBerry Enterprise Server still generally

considered firm standard for enterprise p

mobility

• ActiveSync widely adopted across multiple

device types (e.g. iOS, Android, etc.)

• Good Mobile Messaging much less common

(9)

Native ActiveSync

• Easier provisioning through AutoDiscover

• Feature control and security enforced through

ActiveSync Policies

D i OS l i l i f li i –Device OS controls implementation of policies

• Remote wipe

–Wipes entire device, including personal data

• Statistics data exists but must be interpreted

• Allow/Block/Quarantine

Key Considerations

• BES must be version 5.0.2 MR5 or 5.0.3 MR1 to

address specific performance issues associated with BES and Exchange 2010 SP1

–Windows Server OS hotfixes MAPI/CDO updates –Windows Server OS hotfixes, MAPI/CDO updates,

and Exchange 2010 SP1 RU3 required as well

• Advanced ActiveSync Policies require Enterprise

CAL (application control, browser control, etc.)

Third Party Alternatives

• MobileIron

(10)

Recommendations

• Establish mobile device usage and support

policy

–State if the firm reserves the right to wipe a personal device if lost

personal device if lost

• If advanced inventory, selective data wipe, and

easier statistics are required, consider a third party solution

ANTI-VIRUS & ANTI-SPAM

Native Message Hygiene

• Edge Transport Server role includes some

native anti-spam features

–Connection/content filtering, Sender ID, sender reputation etc

reputation, etc.

• Enterprise CAL (with services) can provide

anti-virus and anti-spam features

(11)

Key Considerations

• Hosted hygiene services dramatically decrease

the traffic that reaches a firm’s environment

–Reduces WAN utilization, server processing, etc.

• Multiple levels of anti-spam can make Multiple levels of anti spam can make quarantining challenging

–No central console for FPE

• Third party anti-virus software that integrates

into transport or scans databases can introduce instability

Third Party Alternatives

• Major anti-virus software vendors

–McAfee, Symantec, Trend Micro

• Hosted hygiene services

M M

–Message Labs, Mimecast, Postini

• Appliance solutions

–Axway (formerly Tumbleweed), Barracuda, Cisco

Recommendations

• Strongly consider hosted provider for hygiene

services (Microsoft or third party)

–If pair hosted provider with Edge Transport Server, consider disabling ETS native anti-spam features consider disabling ETS native anti spam features

• With multiple levels of anti-virus, avoid

scanning database files directly

(12)

UNIFIED MESSAGING

Exchange 2010 Unified Messaging

• Voicemail Preview

• Message Waiting Indicator

• Protected Voicemail

• Call Answering Rules (Enhanced Auto

Attendants)

• Native Faxing Support Removed

(13)

Protected Voicemail

Call Answering Rules

Key Considerations

• Requires supported IP Gateway or IP PBX • Proper high availability and disaster recovery for

UM must be considered

• UM role should be located near HTS, CAS, MBX , , roles

(14)

Third Party Alternatives

• Avaya Modular Messaging

• Cisco Unity

• Traditional PBX Solution

Recommendations

• Understand compliance/discovery requirements

for voicemail storage

• Define feature requirements of voicemail

sol tion solution

• Consider native UM during next voice refresh

INTEGRATION

(15)

SharePoint 2010

• Use Exchange for mail-enabled libraries/lists

• Consider migrating public folder data to

SharePoint for improved usability

L y n c

2010

• Fully integrated with Exchange, SharePoint,

Office

• Presence/IM capabilities available within

OWA, SharePoint, Outlook, other Office , , , applications

• Enables rich and easy collaboration

• Leverages corporate photographs in AD

• Leverages SharePoint skills search for “ask the

expert”

(16)

Lync / Outlook Integration

Lync / AD Integration

(17)

Lync / SharePoint Integration

Lync Skill Search

References

Related documents

Receiving server rejects receipt if verification fails..

AND ITS SUBSIDIARIES, AFFILIATES, OFFICERS, EMPLOYEES, AGENTS, PARTNERS AND LICENSORS SHALL NOT BE LIABLE TO YOU FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL,

To differentiate between keratoconus and contact lens-related corneal warpage by combining focal change patterns in anterior corneal topography, pachymetry, and epithelial

According to our generative model, the contextual bandit algorithm is still robust when different levels of physical activity motivation effects are

Through comparisons it is clear that, when the proposed preprocessing step is applied, linear kernel learning method becomes the fast, reliable and efficient method that improves

A user who is dialing USSD service number initiates dialog with USSD handling application A user who is dialing USSD service number initiates dialog with USSD

Single-top production accounts for 4% of the event yield and the t¯ t prediction accounts for 93% (62% from matched and 31% from not-matched events). Not-matched t¯ t events are

Plat Plat o oo on n succession of command will be as follows: Platoon Leader, Platoon Sergeant, Section succession of command will be as follows: Platoon Leader,