arxiv: v1 [physics.optics] 20 Sep 2021

Vector beam mode detection based on rotational Doppler effect

X

Z

, J

J

,

K

Z

, Z

C

, Z

G

P

Z

MOE Key Laboratory for Nonequilibrium Synthesis and Modulation of Condensed Matter, School of Physics, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an 710049, China

*[email protected]

**[email protected]

Abstract: In this paper we propose a new method detecting both OAM and polarization state for a vector vortex beam using rotational Doppler effect. We show that this new approach measures both the absolute value of the topological charge and its sign. Also, the phase and the visibility of the intensity variance gives the polarization parameters of vector beam. We have also experimentally proved the feasibility of our method. This method solves the drawback in existing experimental schemes that they cannot measure the topological charge of a vector beam while giving its polarization parameter, and overcomes the degeneracy problem in spectrum analyzer based on the rotational Doppler effect.

© 2021 A Committee under the terms ofA Publishing Agreement

1. Introduction

While the polarization of light relates to its spin angular momentum, the orbital angular momentum (OAM) of light has been demonstrated to be related with its spatial phase distribution [1]. Vector vortex or vector beam, as a vectorial solution of the wave equation for the electric field [2], has more complicated properties than the homogeneous polarized vortex filed for it combines both spin and orbital angular momentum of light. Circular polarized state and spiral phase is classical entangled in vector beams which is reflected by its nonuniform polarization. One example of vector beams is the vector beams with cylindrical symmetry in polarization called cylindrical vector beams (CVB). Due to its symmetrical polarization distribution, cylindrical vector beam has arisen many applications in variety fields such as super-resolution imaging [3–5]

and optical-trapping [6–8]. Besides the symmetric properties of CVBs, the orthogonality between different CVBs also arises rich application. One such example is the mode-division multiplexing (MDM) which is widely used in high-capacity communication [9]. This technique uses multiple orthogonal modes of optical field as information carriers. As eigenstates of polarized optical field with OAM, CVBs can also be used as carrier for MDM and has larger capacity compared with the scalar orthogonal sets. Therefor, how to effectively generate, detect CVB and its decomposition has becomes an interesting topic. Investigators have proposed many generation method for CVB.

One simplest way is by using a patterned liquid crystal device called q-plate [10]. Also, specially designed cavity resonator could directly output laser with optical vortex [11]. More recently, a new passive generation technique using polarization-selective Gouy phase shifter has been proposed which allows simultaneous generation of multiple arbitrary CVBs [12].

In contrast to the generation, there are not many methods for the detection of CVBs and its decomposition. The identification of topological charge (TC) of CVB can be accomplished by using mutual interference pattern between the two spiral phases within the CVB [13]. In addition, interferometric mode sorter using Mach-Zender interferometer relates the TC of CVBs with spatial position which allows us to obtain the OAM of right or left circular polarized states [14].

Such detection schemes are unsatisfactory because they are unable to evaluate the polarization state simultaneously and their measurement result is not quite quantitative. The mapping can be

arXiv:2109.09324v1 [physics.optics] 20 Sep 2021

further extended to two dimensions with an additional axis represent different polarization states.

Simultaneous measurement of OAM and polarization states of CVBs thus is completed through the different point on the plane [15]. Mode decomposition on the other hand focus on the linear combination of different CVB modes. The superposition coefficients can be calculated by an inner product measurement with a Fourier lens [16]. One alternative way is mode sorter using q-plate or cased interferometer which direct different vector mode in to different path [17, 18].

Rotational Doppler effect is a useful tool studying vortex property of OAM light. When a vortex beam illuminates a spinning object with angular velocity 𝜔, the reflected light will experience a frequency shift and the change in orbital angular momentum [19]. The frequency shift of the reflected light is proportionate to Ω and the difference of OAM 𝑛. This is called rotational Doppler effect (RDE). Such frequency shift share a common origin with the well-known linear Doppler effect which arises from the linear momentum of light [20]. Such frequency shift can be observed not only in monochromatic light, but also in OAM carrying white-light [21] which enable its application in remote detection of spinning objects. Because the frequency shift is related to the OAM of light, rotational Doppler effect is also a good candidate in analysis of OAM components. OAM spectrum analyzer based on the rotational Doppler effect has shown its great potential in application like mode-division multiplexing in optical communication.

In this paper, we first discuss the characteristics of the rotational Doppler effect of CVB and the optical beating effect due to opposite frequency shift. Then, We show that such beating frequency is degenerate for two CVBs with equal absolute value of TC.While the frequency of the beating effect gives the absolute value of TC, its sign is determined by the different phase shift. The visibility and the initial phase of intensity variation are regulated by two polarization parameters of CVB. We verify our theoretical approach through experiment. Under the condition of introducing a reference mode, we measure the absolute value of topological charges of CVB and its polarization parameters, and successfully distinguish two CVB modes whose beating frequency are degenerate.We also discuss the rotational Doppler effect of multiple modes and its future application in mode demultiplexing.

2. Single mode detection using RDE

Previous research has established that the change in angular momentum is determined by the surface of the spinning object and thus the frequency shift is independent of the TC of incident light [22]. The spinning object can be considered as a pure phase modulator 𝑂 (r, 𝜙) which is determined by the roughness of surface. We expand the modulation function into Fourier series

𝑂(r, 𝜙) =∑︁

𝑛

𝐴_𝑛(r, 𝜙)e^{𝑖 𝑛( 𝜙−Ω𝑡)}=∑︁

𝑛

𝐴_𝑛(r, 𝜙)e^{𝑖 𝑛 𝜙}e^{−𝑖𝑛Ω𝑡} (1)

where Ω is the angular velocity of the spinning object and 𝐴^𝑛(r, 𝜙) is the normalized complex amplitude. If a incident light with orbital angular momentum ℓℏ per photon illuminate the object, the reflected light will be a superposition of different OAM modes(ℓ⁰= ℓ + 𝑛)and each mode components have a distinct frequency shift Δ 𝑓 = (ℓ⁰− ℓ)Ω/2𝜋 = 𝑛Ω/2𝜋, which is related only to the object.

Then we consider the RDE for vector vortex beam, refer to as vectorial rotational Doppler effect (VRDE). Using the concept of Higher-Order Poincaré Sphere (HOPS) [23], the state of an arbitrary CVB can be written as follow

Ψ𝑙(r) = cos 𝜐e^−𝑖𝛾𝑢_ℓ(r) ˆeR+ sin 𝜐e^{𝑖 𝛾}𝑢_−ℓ(r) ˆeL (2) 𝑢_ℓ(r) = 𝐵|ℓ |(𝑟, 𝑧)e^{−𝑖ℓ 𝜙}is the complex amplitude of an OAM mode with TC = ℓ and 𝐵|ℓ |(𝑟, 𝑧) is the part of the amplitude that is independent of azimuthal angle 𝜙. ˆeRand ˆeLare the unitary vectors correspond to right and left circular polarization. (2𝜐, 2𝛾) are the polar angle and the

Fig. 1. Schematically demonstration for a vector beam illuminating a rotating object and the induced beating effect. In this example, the topological charge of the incident CVB is ℓ = 2 while the rotating object can be regarded as a multi-mode spiral phase plate with mode number 𝑛 = −4, −2, 0, 2, 4. Significant beating effect occurs only between the same modes in the scattered light due to the orthogonality between different OAM modes. In this example, only the mode component of the scattered light with ℓ⁰= −2, 2 is able to produce a variable intensity with beating frequency 𝑓 = 4Ω/2𝜋.

equator angle of HOPS shown in Fig.3(a) which characterize the state of polarization. If a CVB incidents normally on the spinning object, the vectorial component of the scatter light is

𝐸_𝐻 = 1

√ 2

𝐵_{|ℓ |}

∑︁

ℓ⁰



𝐴_ℓ−ℓ0cos 𝜐e^−𝑖𝛾e^{𝑖(ℓ0−ℓ)Ω𝑡} +𝐴−ℓ−ℓ⁰sin 𝜐e^{𝑖 𝛾}e^{𝑖(ℓ0+ℓ)Ω𝑡}



e^{−𝑖ℓ0𝜙} (3)

Eq.(3) shows explicitly that the scattered light consists of different OAM modes and each OAM mode contains two different frequency shifts. Such differences induced beating frequency in the over all light intensity. Notice also that different modes are orthogonal to each other, so that beating effect occurs within the same OAM mode. The angular frequency of beating thus is 2ℓΩ𝑡.

The collected intensity of the fundamental mode of scattered light is

𝐼_𝐻 = 1 2  𝐵|ℓ |

2

| 𝐴ℓ|²cos²𝜐+ | 𝐴−ℓ|²sin²𝜈 +

 𝐴ℓ𝐴_−ℓ^∗ 

sin 2𝜐 cos(2ℓΩ𝑡 + 2𝛾 − 𝜉)

(4) where 𝜉 = arg( 𝐴^ℓ𝐴^∗

−ℓ). From Eq.(4), we see that the light intensity is time dependent and varies periodically. The beating frequency is now proportional to the TC of the incident beam while the frequency shift of RDE is only associated to the phase patter of the object. Thus, once we know the angular velocity Ω of the spinning object, we can induce the TC of the incident light through the intensity variance frequency. Fig.1 shows schematically the process of VRDE and the corresponding beating effect.

Notice that the time variance term in Eq.(4) is modified by factor sin 2𝜐 which ranges between [0, 1]. We can define the visibility 𝑈 here which describes the extend of change over time of

light intensity

𝑈= 𝐼_max− 𝐼_min 𝐼_max+ 𝐼_min

=   𝐴ℓ𝐴^∗

−ℓ

 sin 2𝜐

| 𝐴ℓ|²cos²𝜐+ | 𝐴−ℓ|²sin²𝜐

(5)

When 𝜐 = 0 or 𝜐 = 𝜋/2, the visibility becomes zero. This points out that the time variance is less distinct around the poles of HOPS and eventually vanished at poles.U reflects the degree of spatial variation of the polarization. At poles of HOPS, spatial polarization distribution becomes homogeneous, and the beating effect disappears accordingly. If the superposition coefficients satisfied | 𝐴^ℓ| = | 𝐴−ℓ|, Eq.(5) reduces to 𝑈 = sin 2𝜐. Under this particular condition, it is not difficult to determine the polar angle 2𝜐 by measuring the visibility of the collected intensity.

Fig. 2. Experiment set up for single mode detection. The combination of HWP and PBS is used to regulate the input light intensity. The scattered light from SLM is then directed to a pinhole (P) to select its fundamental mode. The overall intensity is collected through a CCD

To describe all the possible states of CVBs with same absolute value of TC, two higher-order spheres with opposite OV at poles are required [23].However, two CVBs with same |ℓ| in Eq.(2) share the same beating frequency and thus each component of the power spectrum is two-fold degenerate.Fig.4(a) shows two HOPS sharing same beating frequency, the blue sphere stands for CVBs of Eq.(2) with ℓ = 1 and the red sphere stands for ℓ = −1.

Different from scalar RDE, VRDE exhibits differently phase shift in beating after passing two polarizer [24]. Two frequency degenerate CVBs can also be distinguished through phase shift in intensity signal. For these two states, the intensity variance over time differs only in the sign of the constant phase. Hence, if the equator angle rotate certain angle, their intensity signal will experience opposite phase shift. When the positive rotated angle is denoted by 𝜃, then time variance in the corresponding intensity become

𝐼_𝐻 ∝ 1 + cos (2ℓΩ𝑡 + 2𝛾 + 𝜃 − 𝛿) (6)

Above equation shows that the phase now increases linearly as 𝜃 increases if ℓ > 0 and decreases if ℓ < 0.

Fig. 3. (a) Demonstration of HOPS and the measured points. Point A represent our reference vector beam in the succeeding experiment. (b) Measured intensity variation over time for each state. (c1) Visibility of collected intensity. (c2) Experiment value of sin 2𝜐 and its comparison with our set up. Here, A is used as the reference light. (c3) Phase of the Fourier transfer of collected intensity. (c4) Experiment value of equator angle 2𝛾 and its comparison with our set up.

3. Experiment result

We set up an experiment configuration to verify our method. Fig.2 illustrates the schematic of the experimental design. In our experiment, we use a q-plate with 𝑄 = 1/2 to first generates CVB with ℓ = 1 which then illuminates a spatial light modulator after expansion. The polar angle of generated CVB is adjusted by a QWP displayed before the q-plate. The SLM is loaded with a computational hologram to simulate the desired spinning object [25]. The scattered light then passes a pinhole to select the fundamental mode and the final light intensity is collected by a charge-coupled device (CCD).

In our experiment, we use two HWP to change the equator angle 2𝛾. Single HWP transform a point in HOPS at (2𝜐, 2𝛾) to (𝜋 − 2𝜐, −2𝛾 + 4𝛼) where 𝛼 is the angle between the fast axis of HWP and the horizontal direction. The transformed state passing two HWP is thus (2𝜐, 2𝛾 + 4Δ𝛼) in which Δ𝛼 = 𝛼⁰− 𝛼 and 𝛼, 𝛼⁰is the aligned angle of fast axis of the first and the second HWP.

We use two HWP to maintain spiral direction of OAM.

We measured six distinctive points on the HOPS with ℓ = 1. Fig.3(a) displays polar and equator angle of each point and their polarization distribution. Fig.3(b) demonstrates the measured

intensity of each state. While most of the experimental data fits well with cosine curves, some of them have a large deviation. This is because the q-plate used in our experiment is defective in some positions, which makes the collected intensity sudden decrease at some specific positions.

However, the number of affected data is very small and our experimental results continue to be quite valid. Each intensity undergoes two periods when the object rotates one cycle and their initial phase changes with the equator angle, which agrees with our theoretical analysis.

The result also verifies that elliptical polarized field has a smaller range of intensity variation than linear polarization. The smallest value of intensity is not zero implying the existence of time-independent background light. This background light comes from the fact that Fig.3(c) shows the intensity variance over time for each polarization state. The intensity experience two full periods for one complete rotation of the object, which consists with our theoretical prediction.

Different point experiences different phase shift in their intensity. The measured phase of each intensity plot presented in Fig.3(b1) shows these differences quantitatively. Notice also that the extent of intensity variation diminished for the point that is close to pole. Fig.3(c1) and (c3) exhibits the visibility and phase of intensity for each state. The phase of the intensity signal is acquired by performing fast Fourier transform (FFT) to the experiment data. Notice that the visibility of radially polarized light is not one as predicted because the modulation of SLM is insufficient and optical devices also introduce additional phase so that its measured phase is also not zero.Therefore, we need collaborate our system before measurement by performing one measurement first on a reference light with known polarization. The visibility and phase of the reference light serve as a scale. The equator angle of an unknown CVB is given by subtracting the phase of reference light, and the sine value of polar angle is given by the following equation sin 2𝜐Unk = sin 2𝜐Ref · 𝑈_Unk/𝑈_Ref. Fig.3(c2) and (c4) present our final experiment result of polarization parameters. We use the radially polarized field (point A) as the reference light and attain the polarization parameter of the rest. The result fits well with our expectation, suggesting the feasibility of our method.

Fig. 4. (a) Schematic demonstration of two HOPS entangled with opposite spiral phase. The blue sphere stands for HOPS with ℓ = 1 while the red one with ℓ = −1.

(b)Experiment result of degeneracy in beating effect between radial vector beam and 𝜋-radial vector beam. It also evinces the opposite phase shift in two degenerate sphere when their equator angle change. (c) Relationship between phase of FFT and rotation angle of HWP, showing two degenerate HOPS experiencing opposite phase shift while rotating the equator angle.

We also set up an experiment to verify our previous discussion about the degeneracy between

two HOPS. We measured two states on each HOPS with the same polarization parameters presented in Fig4(a). It is evidenced by Fig4(b) that radial (point A) and 𝜋-radial (point A’) vector beam share identical intensity variation. Experiment result also demonstrates that a rotated state B on higher-order sphere with ℓ = 1 experience phase delay while the same rotated state B’ on the corresponding sphere with ℓ = −1 undergoes phase advance. Fig4(c) shows the relationship between measured FFT phase and rotation angle of HWP. It is apparent from the result that two degenerate HOPS have opposite phase change with equator angle.

4. Conclusion

In summery, we first demonstrate that the rotational Doppler effect for vector beam will introduce a beating frequency in the scattered light intensity. The visibility and phase of intensity change with the polar angle and equator angle of the representative point. Via introduction a reference light, we can obtain the polarization parameters of incident CVB through visibility and measured phase of FFT. Then, we discuss the degeneracy in frequency between two CVB with opposite TC.

Such degenerate states exhibit opposite phase shift when changing its equator angle. Analysis of vectorial rotational Doppler effect undertaken here, has provided a more quantitative and efficient design in vector beam mode detection.

References

1. L. Allen, M. W. Beijersbergen, R. J. C. Spreeuw, and J. P. Woerdman, “Orbital angular momentum of light and the transformation of laguerre-gaussian laser modes,” Phys. Rev. A 45, 8185–8189 (1992).

2. Q. Zhan, “Cylindrical vector beams: From mathematical concepts to applications,” Opt. InfoBase Conf. Pap. 1, 1–57 (2009).

3. R. Chen, K. Agarwal, C. J. R. Sheppard, and X. Chen, “Imaging using cylindrical vector beams in a high-numerical- aperture microscopy system,” Opt. Lett. 38, 3111–3114 (2013).

4. S. Segawa, Y. Kozawa, and S. Sato, “Resolution enhancement of confocal microscopy by subtraction method with vector beams,” Opt. Lett. 39, 3118–3121 (2014).

5. P. Török and P. Munro, “The use of gauss-laguerre vector beams in sted microscopy,” Opt. Express 12, 3605–3617 (2004).

6. Y. Kozawa and S. Sato, “Optical trapping of micrometer-sized dielectric particles by cylindrical vector beams,” Opt.

Express 18, 10828–10833 (2010).

7. S. E. Skelton, M. Sergides, R. Saija, M. A. Iatì, O. M. Maragó, and P. H. Jones, “Trapping volume control in optical tweezers using cylindrical vector beams,” Opt. Lett. 38, 28–30 (2013).

8. M. G. Donato, S. Vasi, R. Sayed, P. H. Jones, F. Bonaccorso, A. C. Ferrari, P. G. Gucciardi, and O. M. Maragò,

“Optical trapping of nanotubes with cylindrical vector beams,” Opt. Lett. 37, 3381–3383 (2012).

9. D. H. Sim, Y. Takushima, and Y. C. Chung, “High-speed multimode fiber transmission by using mode-field matched center-launching technique,” J. Light. Technol. 27, 1018–1026 (2009).

10. F. Cardano, E. Karimi, S. Slussarenko, L. Marrucci, C. de Lisio, and E. Santamato, “Polarization pattern of vector vortex beams generated by q-plates with different topological charges,” Appl. Opt. 51, C1–C6 (2012).

11. D. Wei, Y. Cheng, R. Ni, Y. Zhang, X. Hu, S. Zhu, and M. Xiao, “Generating controllable laguerre-gaussian laser modes through intracavity spin-orbital angular momentum conversion of light,” Phys. Rev. Appl. 11, 014038 (2019).

12. J. Jia, K. Zhang, G. Hu, M. Hu, T. Tong, Q. Mu, H. Gao, F. Li, C.-W. Qiu, and P. Zhang, “Arbitrary cylindrical vector beam generation enabled by polarization-selective gouy phase shifter,” Photon. Res. 9, 1048–1054 (2021).

13. G.-G. Liu, K. Wang, Y.-H. Lee, D. Wang, P.-P. Li, F. Gou, Y. Li, C. Tu, S.-T. Wu, and H.-T. Wang, “Measurement of the topological charge and index of vortex vector optical fields with a space-variant half-wave plate,” Opt. Lett. 43, 823 (2018).

14. B. Ndagano, I. Nape, B. Perez-Garcia, S. Scholes, R. I. Hernandez-Aranda, T. Konrad, M. P. Lavery, and A. Forbes,

“A deterministic detector for vector vortex states,” Sci. Reports 7, 1–8 (2017).

15. I. Moreno, J. A. Davis, K. Badham, M. M. Sánchez-López, J. E. Holland, and D. M. Cottrell, “Vector beam polarization state spectrum analyzer,” Sci. Reports 7, 1–10 (2017).

16. B. Ndagano, R. Brüning, M. McLaren, M. Duparré, and A. Forbes, “Fiber propagation of vector modes,” Opt.

Express 23, 17330 (2015).

17. G. Milione, M. P. J. Lavery, H. Huang, Y. Ren, G. Xie, T. A. Nguyen, E. Karimi, L. Marrucci, D. A. Nolan, R. R.

Alfano, and A. E. Willner, “4× 20 Gbit/s mode division multiplexing over free space using vector modes and a q-plate mode (de)multiplexer,” Opt. Lett. 40, 1980 (2015).

18. J. Jia, Z. Chang, H. Yang, Q. Liu, F. Wang, H. Gao, F. Li, and P. Zhang, “Mode sorter designed for (de)multiplexing vector vortex modes,” Appl. Opt. 58, 7094 (2019).

19. M. P. J. Lavery, F. C. Speirits, S. M. Barnett, and M. J. Padgett, “Detection of a spinning object using light’s orbital angular momentum,” Science 341, 537–540 (2013).

20. L. Fang, M. J. Padgett, and J. Wang, “Sharing a Common Origin Between the Rotational and Linear Doppler Effects,”

Laser Photonics Rev. 11, 1–8 (2017).

21. M. P. J. Lavery, S. M. Barnett, F. C. Speirits, and M. J. Padgett, “Observation of the rotational Doppler shift of a white-light, orbital-angular-momentum-carrying beam backscattered from a rotating body,” Optica 1, 1 (2014).

22. H. Zhou, D. Fu, J. Dong, P. Zhang, and X. Zhang, “Theoretical analysis and experimental verification on optical rotational Doppler effect,” Opt. Express 24, 10050 (2016).

23. G. Milione, H. I. Sztul, D. A. Nolan, and R. R. Alfano, “Higher-order poincaré sphere, stokes parameters, and the angular momentum of light,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 1–4 (2011).

24. L. Fang, Z. Wan, A. Forbes, and J. Wang, “Vectorial Doppler metrology,” Nat. Commun. pp. 1–10.

25. L. Zhu and J. Wang, “Simultaneous generation of multiple orbital angular momentum (OAM) modes using a single phase-only element,” Opt. Express 23, 26221 (2015).