• No results found

Appraisal policy. City of London. Culture, Heritage and Libraries Department. London Metropolitan Archives

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Appraisal policy. City of London. Culture, Heritage and Libraries Department. London Metropolitan Archives"

Copied!
10
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

Appraisal policy

City of London

Culture, Heritage and Libraries Department London Metropolitan Archives

(2)

Contents

Appraisal policy ... 1

Contents ... 2

Vision Statement ... 3

Policy ... 3

Background ... 3

Scope ... 3

Definition of archival appraisal ... 4

Aims ... 4

Procedures for appraisal ... 4

Specific principles and methodology ... 6

Feedback ... 8

Mission Statement of the Department of Culture, Heritage and Libraries: ... 8

Our commitment:... 8

Index ... 10

About this leaflet ... 10

(3)

3

Vision Statement

London Metropolitan Archives (LMA) exists to collect records of

London’s rich past history and to find and collect records of London’s vibrant and diverse present. We select records of the highest archival value for permanent preservation. Appraisal is an essential archival activity which informs our selection procedure.

Policy

Background

1. Appraisal and removal of duplicate, ephemeral and low

information value records allows LMA to maximise storage space for archive collections of permanent historical value.

2. Modern archives are particularly voluminous. This is especially true for London, due to the history of London government, and to the proliferation of organisations based in the capital, many of which have deposited their archives at LMA. Appraisal is necessary to maintain control of this material and to ensure that only the items most useful and relevant to research are retained.

3. The passing of the Freedom of Information Act in 2000 has made the recording of information about appraisal, and especially disposal, decisions of vital importance. The Lord Chancellor’s Code of

Practice on the Management of Records, issued under section 46 of the Freedom of Information Act 2000 states “…authorities need to have in place systems for managing appraisal and for recording the disposal decisions made”.

Scope

4. This policy applies to all collections stored and maintained by LMA i.e. the History of London Collection, designated as being of

national and international importance by the Museums, Libraries and Archives Council in 2005. It includes both collections owned by the City of London and those deposited on long term loan.

5. Our right to appraise will be negotiated and recorded in the deposit or gift agreement for each archive collection.

6. This policy covers the appraisal of newly deposited/given records, and also considers the re-appraisal of existing collections.

(4)

Definition of archival appraisal

7. Appraisal is the process of selecting records of long-term archival value for permanent preservation and identifying records of low or no further value so that they can be destroyed.

Appraisal is a quality control mechanism. It is a positive and essential archival activity.

Aims

8. To ensure that appraisal strategy for archival purposes selects records of the highest archival value, avoiding duplication. LMA preserves and conserves records permanently and must therefore limit its holdings to records of the highest archival value.

9. To assess the historical significance of individual items, series and collections across the History of London Collection and in particular to develop rational, consistent and cost-effective appraisal

methodology for records common to certain types of organisations 10. To provide rational and consistent appraisal decisions, valid over

time, for all records of potential archival value produced by the organisations and individuals whose collections are held at LMA and to document those decisions.

11. To destroy duplicate material and ephemera and to destroy all other unwanted material confidentially, if not wanted by the depositor. Material will occasionally be offered to other archive services.

12. To be aware of usage and potential future research, and to assess these needs alongside overall collection and acquisition strategies as set out in our Collections Policy.

13. To assess risk in all circumstances and make decisions based on full analysis of available information

Procedures for appraisal

14. Appraisal will be carried out by qualified archival professionals, or by para-professionals under the supervision of a qualified archivist.

15. Appraisal of new deposits and gifts will be carried out in two stages, before receipt into LMA and after receipt during the cataloguing process.

(5)

5 not worthy of long-term preservation. This pre-acquisition appraisal helps avoid the unnecessary expense of taking this material into LMA and removing it at a later stage. It is of course entirely possible that a collection will be rejected in its entirety.

17. Pre-acquisition appraisal will also provide an opportunity to identify and reject collections, or parts of collections, whose informational value duplicates others already held at LMA or which contravene in-house guidelines. For example, hospital collections often contain formulaic series of patients’ records which are duplicated in the archives of other hospitals and which therefore contain little

historical value over and above that of the individuals represented in the records. In-house guidelines are in place specifying cut-off dates for acceptance of records from specific classifications,

notably 15 years for parish material and two years for coroners’ case files.

18. For newly-deposited/given collections, appraisal will generally be carried out during the cataloguing process on a file by file basis.

19. We will ensure the right to appraisal is embedded in each

deposit/gift agreement. After appraisal, owners of collections will be offered a choice between taking back appraised items, or allowing the items to be sent for confidential destruction. We will not dispose of any records in our ownership by sale.

20. Re-appraisal will often be necessary for larger collections if no or little appraisal was carried out at the time of acquisition.

21. Two methods of appraisal will be used for existing collections,

depending on their size and complexity. Smaller collections may be appraised on a file by file basis. Appraisal on a larger scale will also utilise the file by file method and in some cases this will be

supplemented by macro-appraisal.

22. Macro-appraisal will be applied to very large collections, where the value of the records can be assessed at departmental or unit level rather than at an individual file level. This type of appraisal

encourages organisation-wide analysis of functions as a guide to identifying records of value for archival purposes. It can identify areas of overlap so avoiding duplication of information and sometimes of sources selected for the archive.

23. For both the above methods, we will develop guidance for the appraisal of homogenous categories of records, such as those produced by similar types of department or organisation, e.g.

financial departments, or by similar types of activities/functions.

(6)

24. In the case of public records deposited under the Public Records Act, we will liaise with The National Archives (TNA) to identify any series or items not considered worthy of long-term preservation.

25. All material for disposal will be dealt with confidentially. On rare occasions it may be offered to other archive services (if owned by LMA). Deposited material will be offered back to the depositor unless the depositor cannot be traced (using the last available contact details the depositor has supplied). Unwanted material which has been donated may be offered back to the donor.

Specific principles and methodology

26. Appraisal will be carried out within the following legal framework:

 Freedom of Information Act 2000

 Public Records Act 1958 and 1967

 Adoption legislation (as relating to local government and public records holding concerning care of children)

 Contract law

 Financial regulations

 Data Protection Act 1998

27. Appraisal for archival purposes concentrates largely on the

historical value of a record, any value for current business purposes having been superseded when the collection was deposited in the archive. Historical value can be broken down into two areas:

‘evidential value’, the way the record documents the history, structure and functions of an organisation; and ‘informational value’, or value in providing research material on persons, places and subjects.

28. Records selected for permanent preservation at LMA should be those which show the significance of the functions and activities of organisations. Items of the highest archival value are those which are most capable of documenting change, continuity and

development over time, and of assisting historical interpretation of such changes.

29. Appraisers should therefore use the following criteria when appraising collections, selecting items which give significant information regarding:

(7)

7

 The formulation of any policies or legislation and, more selectively, its implementation and interpretation

 Notable events or persons, but only when the records add significantly to what is already known

 Major events, developments or trends in political, social, legal or economic history, especially those relevant to London history such as the blitz, mass migration, urban development

 Scientific, technological or medical research and development

 Demographic, medical, social, cultural and economic history and historical events

 Geography, including by means of statistical and quantitative research

 Internal or external guidelines which give criteria for specific classes of records, such as the Church of England Record Centre’s “Keep or Bin” for parish records and LMA’s Coroners’

Records Appraisal Criteria for coroners’ case files.

30. Appraisers should additionally be aware of potential levels of interest from our main user-groups, and where possible retain

material which will add significantly to main topics of research, such as genealogy and local history.

31. Appraisers should consider keeping material which may not exactly conform to any established criteria, but which does have

information which is of interest, or which may be presented in a lively and engaging way.

32. All routine or duplicated material should be systematically removed from the collection. Where possible and practical, all types of

records produced by an organisation (and related organisations too if applicable) should be surveyed during appraisal, in order to track or identify sources of information. This will enable items which duplicate information to be selected for disposal.

33. In some circumstances material may be suitable for long-term preservation by virtue of its suitability for audience development and appraisers should also bear this in mind when appraising ephemeral material.

34. Sampling: random or other sampling methods should be used

pragmatically, with appropriate methodologies implemented which are applicable to the collection under review.

(8)

35. All disposal decisions made after deposit/gift of a collection should be recorded in the electronic catalogue at the appropriate level for the material destroyed, including reasons for disposal – direct duplicate, duplicates information held elsewhere, not considered worthy of permanent preservation. Regular statistics should be kept to record the amount of material appraised and destroyed.

36. For electronicrecords, TNA advises waiting 25 years before deciding which items are of archival value. This is due to the potentially large financial outlay involved in the long-term preservation of such records in an accessible form to future generations. In addition computer records may be destroyed inadvertently or by virtue of rapid technological change before appraisal takes place;

information about the records, on which appraisal rests, may be lost once they are inactive.

Feedback

Please complete a comment form or email us at

ask.lma@cityoflondon.gov.uk if you wish to give feedback on this policy.

This policy will be reviewed at least every two years to make sure it remains timely and relevant.

Mission Statement of the Department of Culture, Heritage and Libraries:

The mission of the Department is to educate, entertain and inform, through discovery of our amazing range of resources.

Our commitment:

The City of London provides a unique and diverse range of services to the residents, businesses, workers and visitors in the City of London and beyond. We are committed to being proactive in providing services fairly to all our potential service users. Promoting equal opportunity for all is one of our core values.

Our policy is to treat all service users, and anyone else we come into contact with, equally and with dignity and respect and not to

discriminate on grounds of age, disability status, employment status,

(9)

9 social background, or any other grounds which cannot be shown to be justified. We will recognise, respect and value difference and diversity.

In partnership with our employees, our residential communities and stakeholders, we will work hard to meet our obligations under the relevant anti-discrimination legislation, codes of practice and good practice guidelines.

(10)

Index

Appraisal, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 Appraisal criteria, 7 Macro-appraisal, 6

Pre-acquisition appraisal, 5 Re-appraisal, 5

Collections policy, 4

Data Protection Act 1998, 6 Deposits, 5, 8

Deposit agreements, 3, 5 Gift agreements, 5

Disposal, 3, 6, 8 Duplicates, 3, 4, 8

Electronic records, 8 Ephemera, 3, 4

Freedom of Information Act, 3, 6 Gifts, 8

Gift agreements, 3

History of London collection, 3, 4 Museums, Libraries and Archives

Council, 3

National Archives, The, 6, 8 Public Records Act, 6 Sampling, 8

Statistics, 8

About this leaflet

This leaflet was published in July 2008 and revised in June 2013 by London Metropolitan Archives, 40 Northampton Road, London, EC1R OHB

Telephone: 020 7332 3820 Fax: 020 7833 9136

Email: ask.lma@cityoflondon.gov.uk Website: www.cityoflondon.gov.uk/lma

© London Metropolitan Archives

Except as otherwise permitted under the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988, this publication may only be reproduced, stored or transmitted in any form or by any means, with the prior permission in writing of the publisher, or in the case of reprographic reproduction, in accordance with the terms of a licence issued by the Copyright

Licensing Agency. Enquiries concerning reproduction outside those terms should be sent to the London Metropolitan Archives at the above address.

References

Related documents

 With Boys’ and Girls’ Athletics Commissioners, plan and execute all aspects of student section for athletic events  Leadership Class is required.  Participate in all

The principal hypothesis of AJR is that institutions cause economic perform- ance. To infer causality from institutions to economic development authors assume the strategy of

• Kreischer Miller will be keeping alliance partner updated on all. key aspects of

Queer emerging adults in rural areas are the focus of this literature-based study to determine their needs regarding their identity formation, safety, mental health, and societal

Importantly the evidence of the approved medical officer was not directly corroborated by any of the two police officers, who gave evidence and who were present, nor did she

In conclusion, pCR/spCR, nodal status, and grade were predictors for DFS in patients with HER2-positive disease treated with NAC plus trastuzumab. Response to therapy and prognostic

Table 6 of Pairwise Granger causality tests with the second null hypothesis confirm that there is no integration between the sample countries in Asia because the

Persaud builds upon the macroprudential programme to advocate a role for regulators in shepherding risk throughout the financial system, whereas Ricks offers an