• No results found

Differential responses to woodland character and landscape context by cryptic bats in urban environments

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2020

Share "Differential responses to woodland character and landscape context by cryptic bats in urban environments"

Copied!
14
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

Loading

Figure

Fig 1. Map of central Scotland showing approximate locations of woodland sites (dark green dots) surveyed in 2011
Table 1. The latitude and longitude of the 31 urban woodlands surveyed throughout central Scotland in 2011.
Fig 2. Differential responses to the urban landscape at a variety of spatial scales by cryptic batspecies
Table 2. Parameter estimates and likelihood ratio tests of the GLMM for the relative proportion of P
+3

References

Related documents

The FICON Express LX feature utilizes a long wavelength laser as the optical transceiver and supports use of a 9/125-micrometer single mode fiber optic cable terminated with an

In addition we included one case study, showing the expected increase in 1-FEH activity during cold treatment using 1-kestotriose as substrate, thereby validating this 96-well

Again, the knowledge gained from numerous information of the learning materials (of lexical units of English and Indonesian words and non-lexical units of religious and

Yang ketiga adalah uji parsial parameter model GWPR yang digunakan untuk mengetahui variabel yang berpengaruh secara signifikan terhadap model di tiap lokasi yang

The data in Table 1 demonstrates just how much variation comes into play for Web designers when using multiple tools to evaluate their designs for compliance

Using a 5caC antibody (Active Motif), which specif- ically discriminates this mark from other forms of modified cyto- sine ( Inoue et al., 2011 ), we performed 5caC immunostaining

WARP has surprisingly good performance on the CPU, by comparison to Core Image and Pixel Bender, but Neon CPU code was faster than WARP on all 6 benchmarks by a minimum of 3.8 and

They have also defined themselves in stark contrast to non-adoptees in an effort to give voice to their own experiences and narrative separate from adoptive parents’ and social