• No results found

Assessment of revised patient reported outcome measures for improved readability

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2020

Share "Assessment of revised patient reported outcome measures for improved readability"

Copied!
70
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

Loading

Figure

Table 1. Demographic descriptive statistics for the study participants (N = 45).
Figure 1. Means and standard errors for right ears for audiometric frequencies from 250 – 8000 Hz.
Figure 3. Means and standard errors of the three administrations of the International Outcome Inventory (IOI)
Figure 4. Means and standard errors of the three administrations of the Device-Oriented Subjective Outcome (DOSO) questionnaire
+2

References

Related documents

In 2008, the member-owned grocery wholesaler purchased 220 fuel cell units over traditional lead-acid batteries as a cost effective solution to power its entire lift truck fleet for

After treating with Levafix Blue CA reactive dye a mild inflammation of liver was observed in two mice (No. 1 and 3) but there was no significant effect on third one

Themes from ward rounds & Tracker devices Division of Surgery Developed bespoke Customer Care Programme Developed Customer Care Standards Themes from ward rounds

In accordance with NHS Complaints Regulations (2009), this Annual Report provides detailed information about the nature and number of complaints Airedale NHS Foundation

Hence, this study was undertaken to determine the asso- ciation of non-specific low back pain and disability index with lower extremity alignment factors (pelvic angle, the angle

an accident which occurs on the approach to a junction, where the road has three lanes in one direction and two in the other, but where the general road type is Single Carriageway

Age at time of surgery, sex, fusion level, whole lumbar lordosis, segmental lordosis, preexisting laminar inclination angle, and facet tropism at the cranial fusion segment